No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Centerville Health And Rehab

7300 McEwen Road, Dayton, OH 45459 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (937) 433-3441 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 433-3441 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7700 Washington Village Dr Ste 130 · (937) 433-8060 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
922 Senate Dr · (937) 610-3051 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
721 Lyons Rd · (937) 434-2711 · Call to confirm hours
Park
501 Normandy Ridge Rd · (937) 433-5155 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
667 Miamisburg Centerville Rd · (937) 949-9623

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms41.1%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.4%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.7%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine53.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.2%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.1%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.321.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.771.801.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay8.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
82.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 75.2 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-08)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, resident interview, and policy interview, the facility failed to provide timely dental services for residents to obtain dentures. This affected one (Resident #43) of five residents sampled for dental services. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), unspecified dementia, unspecified anxiety disorder, nicotine dependence, and unspecified, cerebral infarction. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal and self-directed behaviors, occasionally rejected care, and did not wander. Resident #43 required partial assistance with bathing and was independent with setup assistance for other activities of daily living (ADL). Review of care plan dated 05/21/26 revealed Resident #43 had potential for oral/dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of infection control during medication administration. This affected two (Residents #3 and #6) of three residents sampled for medication administration. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, type II diabetes, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, chronic diastolic heart failure, and cirrhosis of the liver. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 had physician orders for routine medications scheduled for morning administration including tamsulosin (used to treat urinary symptoms caused by an enlarged prostate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide a private space for phone conversations without being overheard. This affected one (#80) out of three residents reviewed for reasonable access to privacy. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia without behaviors, anxiety and stroke. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #80 dated 09/30/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 13 indicating a normal thinking and memory. Review of the plan of care for Resident #80 revealed resident requires a private room related to behaviors and psychosocial needs dated 09/29/25. Interventions include psychosocial support and remain in private room. Observation on 12/11/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed Resident #80 was in his room resting in bed without a phone visualized. Interview on 12/16/25 at 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were conducted as scheduled for skin integrity monitoring. This affected one (#85) of three residents reviewed for preventative skin interventions. The facility census was 78. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity, lymphedema, chronic embolism and thrombosis, hereditary deficiency of clotting factor. Resident #85 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #85 dated [DATE] revealed an intact cognition. Resident #85 required set up to maximum assistance with activities of daily living. Resident #85 was coded at risk for skin breakdown. Resident #85 was not coded with any pressure ulcers. Review of the plan of care for Resident #85 dated [DATE] revealed pressure ulcer risk due to assistance required in bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered. This affected one (#85) of three residents reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity, lymphedema, chronic embolism and thrombosis, hereditary deficiency of clotting factor. Resident #85 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #85 dated [DATE] revealed an intact cognition. Resident #85 required set up to maximum assistance with activities of daily living. Resident #85 was coded as incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the plan of care for Resident #85 dated [DATE] revealed alteration in elimination of bowel and bladder and diuretic use. Interventions included check and change with care rounds as needed, laboratory tests as ordered, monitor and report changes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the food prep areas in a sanitary manner, failed to ensure proper setup of the three-compartment sink; and failed to complete daily temperature logs for the dish machine. This affected all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84.Findings include: Observations on 07/01/2025 at 9:34 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, revealed excessive accumulation of dust was observed on the ceiling vent above the food preparation table near the stove. Dietary Aide (DA) #2 was prepping burgers on the food preparation table. A pan of six burgers was observed sitting on the food preparation table underneath the ceiling vent. There was black buildup and excessive accumulation of dust on the ceiling vents above the food preparation table near the walk-in freezer. The ceiling paint was observed to be peeling above the food preparation table near the walk-in freezer. There was an excessive buildup of dust on a ceiling vent located directly above the drying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications and opened insulin vials were discarded when expired in two (Roosevelt, [NAME]) of four medication carts observed. The facility census was 84. Findings include: An observation on 07/03/2025 at 1:15 PM of the Roosevelt medication cart revealed a bottle of fish oil that contained 115 tablets, with an open date of 11/01/2024 and an expiration date of 04/2025. The medication cart revealed a vial of Humalog 100 units/milliliter (ml) insulin with an opened date of 05/24 (month/day). An observation on 07/03/2025 at 1:25 PM of the [NAME] medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22 revealed a vial of Humalog 100 units/ml with an open date of 05/27 (month/day). During an interview on 07/03/2025 at 1:20 PM, LPN #22 stated insulin was to be used within 28 days of being out of the refrigerator and opened. She stated staff were trained and expected to check for expired medication and dates when medications were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered by the physician for one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure expired blood glucose monitoring strips were discarded in four (Roosevelt, [NAME], [NAME], Jefferson) four medication cars observed. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD) of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Resident #10's care plan included a focus area initiated [DATE] that indicated the resident had a potential for alteration in hydration related to diabetes mellitus, potential for alteration in blood glucose due to insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, and impaired cardiovascular status related to ASHD and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN, Form CMS-10055) was prior to the end of covered Medicare Part A services for one (Resident #43) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications. The census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record indicated the facility readmitted Resident #43 on 12/25/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of paraplegia and acute kidney failure. A list of residents discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining during the past six months revealed Resident #43 was discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay on 02/04/2025 but remained in the facility.Resident #43's SNF [Skilled Nursing Facility] Beneficiary Notification Review form, completed by the facility, revealed the facility initiated Resident #43's discharge from Medicare Part A services when the resident's benefit days were not exhausted. The form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure broken bathroom sink faucets in resident rooms, loose door handles to resident rooms, and missing tiles outside the therapy room were repaired to provide a homelike environment. This affected four resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) on two of six halls and the public hallway outside the therapy room. The facility census was 84. Findings included: An observation on 07/01/2025 at 9:57 AM revealed an area in the hallway outside the therapy room had an approximately three feet (ft) by three ft area of missing tiles with red cones placed on each side of the missing tiles. An observation on 07/07/2025 at 8:59 AM revealed the floor in the hallway outside the therapy room continued to have missing tiles with red cones blocking each side. An observation on 07/01/2025 at 12:11 PM revealed the bathroom sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] the faucet was broken, it could not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent staff verbal abuse for two (Resident #25 and Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84. Findings included:1. Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #25 on 01/17/2025. The resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of personal history of traumatic brain injury and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/18/2025, revealed Resident #25 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan revealed a focus area initiated on 01/27/2025 indicating the resident was at risk for impaired neurological status related to a history of traumatic brain injury. Interventions included staff to explain all procedures and reasons before performing them, monitor the resident for changes in condition, and have pleasant interactions, which reassures the resident when they were confused. During an interview on 07/05/2025 at 9:19 AM, Resident #25 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the administrator and the state survey agency for two (Resident #25 and Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 84. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #25 on 01/17/2025. The resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of personal history of traumatic brain injury and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/18/2025, revealed Resident #25 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan revealed a focus area initiated on 01/27/2025 indicating the resident was at risk for impaired neurological status related to a history of traumatic brain injury. Interventions included staff to explain all procedures and reasons before performing them, monitor the resident for changes in condition, and have pleasant interactions, which reassures the resident when they were confused. During an interview on 07/05/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were investigated and failed to prevent further abuse by removing the emoployee from duty after an allegation of abuse. This affected two (Resident #25 and Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84. Findings included:1. Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #25 on 01/17/2025. The resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of personal history of traumatic brain injury and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/18/2025, revealed Resident #25 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan revealed a focus area initiated on 01/27/2025 indicating the resident was at risk for impaired neurological status related to a history of traumatic brain injury. Interventions included staff to explain all procedures and reasons before performing them, monitor the resident for changes in condition, and have pleasant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and a review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman and failed to provide written bed-hold notices for two (Resident #22 and Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 84 Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #22 on [DATE]. The resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Resident #22's progress notes dated [DATE] at 12:00 PM indicated the resident was transferred to the emergency room (ER) for an evaluation and treatment. Resident #22's progress notes dated [DATE] at 10:38 PM that indicated the resident returned to the facility from the hospital at 7:30 PM. Resident #22's progress notes dated [DATE] at 11:51 PM indicated the resident's family member called emergency medical services (EMS) due to suspecting the resident was having a stroke. The note revealed EMS took the resident to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for one (Resident #19) of one resident reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis and oropharyngeal dysphagia (a disorder or impairment in initiating a swallow). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/17/2025, revealed Resident #19 had severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision-making and had a short-term and long-term memory problem. The MDS indicated the resident had a feeding tube while they were a resident at the facility. Resident #19's current physician orders included an order dated 01/02/2025 for nothing by mouth (NPO) diet and enteral feeding of 2calorie formula at 60 milliliters (ml) an hour continuously with a 50 ml an hour fluid flush every shift with a 1320 ml total based on a 22-hour runtime. Review of Resident #19's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, comfortable environment for all residents. This affected 11 (#02, #06, #19, #31, #32, #35, #38, #44, #53, #70, and #71) residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypoxemia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), essential primary hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. Resident #53 was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Observation of the facility on 05/13/25 at 11: 30 A.M. with the Director of Housekeeping and Laundry #134 revealed the following findings: a) Resident #02's bathroom was heavily soiled with dirt, debris…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from pests. This affected one (#26) of four residents reviewed for effective pest control. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 07/09/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, bipolar disorder, personal history of traumatic brain injury, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, epilepsy, osteoarthritis, aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, and cerebellar ataxia. Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as cognitively intact. Interview on 05/06/25 at 3:04 P.M. with a Registered Nurse (RN) #204 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #224 reported they both saw live roaches in Resident #26's bathroom. Observation and interview on 05/06/25 at 3:06 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the presence of five to six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from pests. This had potential to affect all 81 facility residents. The census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple fractures of the ribs right side, pain in unspecified joint, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, legal blindness, urinary tract infection, angina pectoris and heartburn. Review of Resident #11's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was oriented to person, place, time, and situation. Interview with Resident #11 on 04/04/25 at 8:14 A.M. revealed the resident saw a large cockroach in her bathroom a few days ago that was over one inch long. 2. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, interview with the Pest Control Representative, review of pest control notes, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen and dining room area free from pests. This had potential to affect all 74 facility residents. Findings include: Review of pest control notes dated 09/30/24, 10/22/24, 11/27/24, 01/03/25 and 01/27/25 revealed the facility had treatments completed for roaches and mice traps were monitored. Observation and interview on 03/04/25 from 9:40 A.M. to 10:05 A.M. with Kitchen Manager (KM) #205 revealed facility had mice a few weeks ago but they had been treated. Observation of the food area found an extremely large amount of brownish black pellets. KM #205 verified these to be mouse excrement. These were found on baking sheets; in the roboku; in boxes of paper products; in boxes and containers of food such as chips, gelatin, condiments, and packaging with pop cans; on cookie sheets with food on it; and on the silverware holder. KM #205 could not confirm if the mouse droppings were new or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and resident interviews, facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in clean, working order. This affected three (#23, #46, and #50) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 74. Findings include 1. Observation on 03/04/25 at 11:51 P.M. in Resident #46's room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #220 revealed the floor around the packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) heating and cooling unit had several floor tiles which were loose. The floor on the right and left side was dark and appeared to be missing a floor surface. The left side had a hole about the size of a thumb in the flooring. A built-in shelf to the right of the PTAC machine was broken and caved in. Interview at the time of the observation with LPN #220 confirmed the observations. 2. Observation on 03/04/25 at 9:40 A.M. of Resident #50's room revealed a floor board was loose and had fallen off the closet/wall and was sitting upside down on the floor. Both closet doors were broken and off the hinges. Interview on 03/04/25 at 11:53 P.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the facility pest control invoices, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure effective pest control measures were in place. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Interview on 11/24/24 at 7:49 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #170 confirmed she worked on the secure unit and stated she observed a cockroach in the dining area that morning. STNA #170 stated the cockroach crawled under the baseboard on the floor. Interviews on 11/24/24 between 9:45 A.M. to 10:36 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #199, #223, and #250 stated they have observed large insects and cockroaches in the facility hallways and on the secured unit within the past two weeks. Interview on 11/24/24 at 10:17 A.M. with Resident #43 stated he had observed insects and mice in his room. Resident #43 stated she hasn't seen a mouse recently but had seen beetles or large black insects from time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure fingernails were trimmed and free of dirt and debris. This affected one (#30) out of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission ate of 12/11/18 with medical diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS), joint contracture's, and dysphagia. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/27/24, which indicated Resident #30 was cognitively intact and was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL's) and had limited ROM to one upper extremity. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed documentation to support Resident #30 received a bath or shower on 11/11/24, 11/18/24, and 11/22/24 but did not contain documentation to support nail care was provided. Observation with interview on 11/25/24 at 1:27 P.M. of Resident #30 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure splints/braces were applied as ordered. This affected two (#30 and #75) out of three residents reviewed for cares and services to prevent decline in range of motion (ROM). The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission ate of 12/11/18 with medical diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS), joint contracture's, and dysphagia. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/27/24, which indicated Resident #30 was cognitively intact and was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL's) and had limited ROM to one upper extremity. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed a physician order dated 10/24/24 to apply left resting hand splint up to eight hours at night and to discontinue use with any redness or skin breakdown. The order was discontinued on 11/25/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the medical record reviews, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered resulting in two medications errors out of 28 opportunities or a 7.14 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#50 and #62) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 10/21/24 with medical diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, depression, congestive heart failure (CHF), moderate protein calorie malnutrition, and bipolar disorder. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/28/24, which indicated Resident #50 was cognitively intact and required supervision with transfers and toilet hygiene and was independent with bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed a physician order dated 11/22/24 for Ativan one milligram (mg) to give one tablet by mouth daily. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of infection control logs, review of dishwasher logs and review of service invoices, the facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine had the appropriate rinse temperature and chemicals to sanitize dishes. This had the potential to affect all 60 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 60. Findings include: On 04/11/22 at 9:00 A.M. observation of the dishwasher in the dishwasher room revealed the dishwasher heat temperature was 148 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the rinse temperature gauge did not move. Testing of the chemicals with the chemical strips revealed no chlorine was detected in the dishwasher. On 04/11/22 at 9:18 A.M. observation of the recommendations label located on the dishwasher revealed for Chemical Dishwasher the Final Rinse Minimum temperature is 120 degrees F with recommended being 140 degrees F. Wash tank minimum temperature is 120 degrees F with recommended being 140 degrees F. Minimum sanitizer required is 50 parts per million (PPM) of chlorine. On 04/11/22 at 9:15 A.M. an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, facility policy review and review of information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the facility failed to implement infection control practices by ensuring staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to potentially prevent the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #413 revealed an admission date of 04/08/22. Her diagnosis included hypertensive urgency, diabetes mellitus 2, fracture of upper end of right humerus, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, hypokalemia, congestive heart failure, anemia, pleural effusion, hyperlipidemia, irritable bowel syndrome, osteoarthritis, and depression. Review of the 5-day minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/12/22, revealed Resident #413 scored a seven on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] from a hospital stay from 01/18/22 through 01/20/22. Diagnoses include epilepsy and seizures. Further medical record review for Resident #43 revealed there was no documented evidence the Ombudsman was notified of the hospital transfer. Interview on 04/13/22 at 11:38 A.M. with the Social Service Director (SSD) #22 revealed she has not notified the Ombudsman of discharges from the facility because the facility was given a new Ombudsman and she was waiting for them to give her their email address. SSD #22 confirmed there was no evidence of the Ombudsman being notified of Resident #14, #28, #43 or #61's transfers to the hospital. Interview on 04/13/22 at 1:28 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility has not been providing discharge notifications to the Ombudsman. The DON stated the facility is working on putting a program in place to notify the Ombudsman of discharges. 2. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to repeated falls, lack of coordination, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, altered mental, major depressive disorder recurrent, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #28 is her own responsible person. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 to have intact cognition and required extensive assistance with one person physical assist for Activities of Daily Living, (ADL's). Record review of the electronic medical record revealed Resident #28 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] via emergency medical transport. Further medical record review for Resident #28 revealed there was no documented evidence the resident received the bed hold notice. Interview on 04/11/22 at 2:01 P.M., revealed Resident #28 reported she went hospital in February 2022 for bowel problems. Resident #28 denies been given bed hold notice when discharged to hospital. Based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was afforded with the choice of personal care for showering/bathing. This affected one (#53) out of three residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/11/18 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty in walking not elsewhere, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction bladder, dysarthria and anarthria, and voice resonance disorders. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 is cognitive intact. He required two persons plus for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and one person person physical assist for bathing. Review of Resident #53's electronic record revealed showers were scheduled to be given Mondays and Thursdays from 7:00 PM until 7:00 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of facility self-reported incidents and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state survey agency. This affected one (#5) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 60. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/27/18 and a readmission date of 04/01/22. Diagnoses included dementia, psychosis, and lung disease. The most recent quarterly Minimum Date Set (MD'S) dated 03/22/22 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance of one with all care. The resident requires limited assist with ambulation. Review of the behavior plan of care dated 10/05/21 revealed the resident was sexually inappropriate by comments and request. Interventions included diversional activity, redirect, refer to psychiatrist as needed. Review of the Nurses Notes dated 03/12/22 revealed the resident was seen lifting the pants of a female resident (#5) and rubbing a female resident's thigh. The resident was removed from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of facility self-reported incidents and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (#5) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 60. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/27/18 and a readmission date of 04/01/22. Diagnoses included dementia, psychosis, and lung disease. The most recent quarterly Minimum Date Set (MD'S) dated 03/22/22 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance of one with all care. The resident requires limited assist with ambulation. Review of the behavior plan of care dated 10/05/21 revealed the resident was sexually inappropriate by comments and request. Interventions included diversional activity, redirect, refer to psychiatrist as needed. Review of the Nurses Notes dated 03/12/22 revealed the resident was seen lifting the pants of a female resident (#5) and rubbing a female resident's thigh. The resident was removed from the area. The nurse charted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to care conferences to allow them to provide input in their care. This affected two (#28 and #42) out of three residents reviewed for care conferences participation. Facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 05/28/21 with diagnoses including but not limited to encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, altered mental status, repeated falls, lack of coordination, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed there was no documentation of care conference. Interview with Resident #28 on 04/11/22 at 1:59 P.M., revealed she could not remember the last time she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were in place for prevention of falls/accidents. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 60. Findings: Review of medical record for Resident #31 revealed admission date of 07/15/15 with a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. Diagnoses include rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, contracture, and insomnia. The annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed extensive two assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and supervision for eating. Record review of the care plan revealed Resident #31 was at risk for falls/injury related to weakness, impaired mobility, contractures and non compliance with interventions for therapy evaluations and treatment. Interventions included bed in low position, call light and personal items within reach, resident to use call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure dialysis resident received meals before dialysis appointments. This affected one (#48) of one residents reviewed for dialysis. Facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 03/12/22 with diagnoses include protein-calorie malnutrition hypertensive heart, failure and with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, dependence on renal dialysis, convulsions, hyperlipidemia, anemia in chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes with other circulatory complications, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic ophthalmic complication. Resident #48 is his own responsible party. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review medical records revealed Resident #48 attends dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed regarding the use of bedrail's on a residents bed. This affected one (#14) out of three residents reviewed for the use of bedrail's. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #14 revealed admission date of 12/26/19 with no memory impairment cognition modified independence. Diagnoses include congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, reflux and contracture to left knee. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed extensive two assist for bed mobility, transfers, and independent for eating. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #14 has a physical functional deficit related to mobility impairment, and range of motion limitations. Interventions included assistance of one staff member with noted activities of daily living fluctuations. Record review revealed Resident #14 had intact cognition and was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-20 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and staff interview the facility failed to provide State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) annual performance reviews. This affected three STNA's (#9, #99 and #115) of three STNAs who worked at the facility longer than a year. This had the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of STNA #9's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 12/30/15. Further review of the personnel file did not reveal a performance review in the past year. 2. Review of STNA #99's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 11/09/15. Further review of the personnel file did not reveal a performance review in the past year. 3. Review of STNA #115's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 05/19/16. Further review of the personnel file did not reveal a performance review in the past year. Interview on 06/20/19 at 10:52 A.M. with Human Resource (HR) #106 confirmed annual performance reviews were not completed for STNAs #9, #99 and #115. The facility did not provide a policy related to annual performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of manufacture's directions, the facility failed to ensure that mobile and stationary food preparation equipment was properly sanitized, and nutritional supplements and thickened liquids stored in unit refrigerators were stored in a manner to ensure that resident's were not served outdated/spoiled supplements and thickened liquids. This had the potential to affect all 103 residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. A tour of the central kitchen was conducted on 06/17/19 at 8:20 A.M. Dietary staff were in the process of finishing assembling resident breakfast trays. Dietary Supervisor (DS) #60 arrived shortly thereafter. While touring the central kitchen two buckets filled with a quaternary ammonia sanitizing solution were checked with a test strip for proper concentration by DS #60. Both buckets of sanitizing solution registered at 150 parts per million (ppm). Both DS #60 and [NAME] #33 reported that the sanitizing solution was checked when it was dispensed into the buckets and that 150 ppm was acceptable. There was a log near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated in a manner and environment that promoted their individuality and dignity during dining. This had the potential to affect all 15 residents (#3, #4, #5, #21, #25, #40, #51, #55, #56, #57, #62, #81, #90, #93, and #100) of the secured 400/[NAME] unit. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. On 06/17/19 dining observations were conducted on the secured 400 unit dining room from 11:45 A.M. through 12:30 P.M. The 400/[NAME] unit was a secured unit for resident's with dementia. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #70 was present in the dining room at that time attempting to get 12 of the 15 residents on the unit seated at tables. Shortly thereafter STNA #66 appeared in the dining room. STNA #66 stated she was not typically on this unit and she was was filling in for a call off. One additional resident came to the dining room making a total of 13 residents in the dining room. STNA #66 and #70 then began serving trays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This involved 15 of 15 residents (#3, #4, #5, #21, #25, #40, #51, #55, #56, #57, #62, #81, #90, #93, and #100) who resided on the secured 400/[NAME] unit . The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. On 06/17/19 at 11:24 A.M. resident of the 400/[NAME] unit were observed getting ready to be served their lunch in the unit dining room. The wall of the room above and below the wooden chair rails were observed with areas of paint scraped off and gouges in the dry wall in quantities too numerous to count. 2. On 06/17/19 at 2:22 P.M., observation of the resident sleeping room occupied by Resident #21 and #55 revealed Resident #21's call light was broken and non-functioning, the closet drawers had been removed from the closet and were leaning against the wall representing a potential accident hazard, the drawer handle was missing from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-20 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents or the Ombudsman were provided with a written notice of the reason for discharge or transfer. This affected five (#12, #50, #58, #64 and #302) of six residents reviewed for discharge notification. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Closed edical record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; heart failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features, type two diabetes mellitus, anemia, cerebral infarction, hyperlipidemia, glaucoma, pain in left shoulder and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene and toileting. Resident #12 also required total dependence with transfers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-20 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely provide written bed-hold notices to residents when hospitalized . This affected four (#12 #50, #58 and #302) of six residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, sepsis, obstructive and reflux uropathy, malignant neoplasm of lateral wall of bladder, encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, calculus of kidney, essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hydronephrosis, anemia in chronic kidney disease, calculus of ureter. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of activity calendar, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities for each resident that met their individual needs and preferences. This directly affected two resident (#55, #81) and had the potential to affect all 15 residents (#3, #4, #5, #21, #25, #40, #51, #55, #56, #57, #62, #81, #90, #93, and #100) of the secured 400/[NAME] unit for resident's with dementia related diagnoses. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, abnormal posture, and hypertension. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. The assessment identified the resident had short and long term memory problems, severely impaired cognitive skills, and requiring supervision and the physical assistance of one to two staff persons to complete all activities of daily living. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident's Do No Resuscitate (DNR) code status designation was documented on a valid form and failed to ensure resident's code status matched throughout the medical record. This affected two (#10 and #50) of 32 residents reviewed during the initial pool screening of the annual survey. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, generalized anxiety disorder, pancytopenia, acute myeloblastic leukemia, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, dysphagia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, polyneuropathy, arthropathy, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, squamous cell carcinoma of skin, and malignant neoplasm of the mouth. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents that were discharged from Medicare Part A services were notified of the potential liability for payment. This affected two (#79 and #306) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; chronic ischemic heart disease, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, sepsis due to Escherichia coli, personal history of transient ischemia attached, cerebral atherosclerosis, anxiety disorder, chest pain, other specified conduct disorder, convulsions, dementia without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, legal blindness and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #79's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDSs) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for required Preadmission Screening and for discharge planning. This affected two residents (#39 and #58) of 32 reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Resident #58 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, sepsis, obstructive and reflux uropathy, malignant neoplasm of lateral wall of bladder, encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, calculus of kidney, essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hydronephrosis, anemia in chronic kidney disease, and calculus of ureter. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for newly admitted residents. The facility also failed to notify the state mental health authority of significant changes in a resident's mental health. This affected three (#37, #58, and #99) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another skilled nursing facility with the following diagnoses; major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, unspecified psychosis, multiple sclerosis, hyperlipidemia, polyneuropathy, hypertension, low back pain, other abnormal involuntary movements, other lack of coordination, hyperthyroidism and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #99's PASARR dated 05/30/19 revealed mood disorder, panic or other severe anxiety disorder and other psychotic disorder were not marked on the PASARR. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop accurate baseline care plans for residents within 48 hours of their admission. This affected two (#10 and #27) of 23 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; hypotension, difficulty in walking, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, cataract, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, unsteadiness on feet, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, dementia without behavioral disturbance, vitamin D deficiency, pure hypercholesterolemia, restlessness and agitation, muscle weakness and syncope and collapse. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of activity schedules and participation records, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for activities for two residents (#55 and #81) and develop a comprehensive plan of care regarding anticoagulation use and dementia care for one resident (#27). The deficit practice affected three residents (#27, #55, and #81) of 26 care plans reviewed during the investigative phase. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, abnormal posture, and hypertension. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. The assessment identified the resident had short and long term memory problems, severely impaired cognitive skills, and requiring supervision and the physical assistance of one to two staff persons to complete all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' discharge goals were included in the comprehensive care plan. This affected one (#39) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, anemia, major depressive disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, bipolar disorder, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had adequate hearing and vision with corrective lenses, made self understood and understood others, and had moderately impaired cognition. The assessment also documented the resident required extensive physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Review of the comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to provide dependent residents with the necessary personal care consistent with needs and preferences. This involved one resident (#7) of three reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The facility census was 103. Findings include: Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, quadriplegia, chronic pain, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) on 03/28/19. The assessment identified the resident had good memory and recall, no behaviors of rejection of care, and the resident required the physical assistance of one to two staff persons to complete all ADLs including bathing and personal hygiene. Further review of the medical record revealed under the task for State Tested Nurse Aides (STNAs) that the resident preferred baths/showers on Tuesdays and Fridays during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician's order to discharge from the facility. This affected one (#102) of 23 residents reviewed for physician's orders. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of Resident #102's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; abnormal coagulant profile, personal history of other diseases of circulatory system, other transient cerebral ischemic attacks and related syndromes, non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, unspecified fall, difficulty in walking, cystitis, insomnia, pain, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, cerebral infarction, essential hypertension and cognitive communication deficit. Further review of Resident #102's medical record revealed the resident discharged from the facility to an assisted living on 05/10/19. Review of Resident #102's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, pharmacy recommendation review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications ordered on an as needed basis were not ordered for an indefinite period of time. This affected one (#75) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 103. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder ,paranoid personality disorder, and general anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive two-person assistance with activities of daily living. Review of Resident #75's current physician's orders revealed an order dated 05/10/19 for Xanax (psychotropic medication used for anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every six hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety. There was no stop date attached to the medication. The 14th day of the PRN order was 05/24/19. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to appropriately label opened bottles of eye medications. This directly affected one resident (#252) during observation. The facility reported 29 residents received eye drops in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure medications were secure. This affected one resident (#64) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of Resident #252's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, blindness in one eye and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 04/09/19 revealed the resident was legally blind, and medications were to be administered as ordered. Review of Resident #252's physician orders dated 06/12/19 revealed Betimol solution 0.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-20 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received their mechanically altered therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician. This involved one resident (#55) of 15 residents observed during dining who resided on the secured 400 unit ([NAME] Unit). The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, abnormal posture, and hypertension. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. The assessment identified the resident had short and long term memory problems, had severely impaired cognitive skills, required supervision and the physical assistance of one staff person to eat. Review of Resident #55's current physician's orders revealed an order for the resident to receive a regular diet with pureed texture. On 06/17/19 at 4:37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-04-20 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide performance evaluations for state tested nursing assistants (STNA's). This affected one of five state tested nursing assistant employee files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of employee file for STNA #32 revealed a hire date of 05/21/18. Further review of the employee file revealed there was no annual performance evaluation. Interview on 04/18/22 at 11:00 A.M. with Specialty Payroll #26 verified there was no annual performance evaluation for STNA #32.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-06-20 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Administrator was present at quarterly quality assessment and assurance (QAA) meetings. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of the QAA meeting sign in sheets revealed meetings were held on 08/22/18, 01/09/19 and 04/10/19. Further review of the QAA meeting sign in sheets revealed the Administrator was not present at the meeting on 01/09/19 and 04/10/19. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/20/19 at 4:35 P.M. verified QAA meetings were held on 08/22/19, 01/09/19 and 04/10/19. The DON also confirmed the Administrator was not present at the 01/09/19 and 04/10/19 meetings per the sign in sheet.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 78 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Beavercreek Health And RehabBeavercreek, OH 1 of 5Bradford Heights Nursing & RehabilitationHopkinsville, KY 1 of 5Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterClayton, NC 1 of 5Dade City Health And Rehabilitation CenterDade City, FL 1 of 5Englewood Health And RehabEnglewood, OH 1 of 5Fulton Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLCFulton, KY 1 of 5Gainesville Health and RehabilitationGainesville, FL 1 of 5Garden View Health And Rehabilitation CenterVero Beach, FL 1 of 5Hertford Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterHertford, NC 1 of 5Longwood Health And Rehabilitation CenterLongwood, FL 1 of 5Lotus Village Center for Nursing and RehabilitatioSparta, NC 1 of 5Magnolia Creek Nursing And RehabilitationCovington, TN 1 of 5Mills Nursing & RehabilitationMayfield, KY 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Health and RehabilitationMonticello, KY 1 of 5Naples Health And Rehabilitation CenterNaples, FL 1 of 5Southpoint Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Spring View Nursing & RehabilitationLeitchfield, KY 1 of 5Sunrise Point Health And Rehabilitation CenterRockledge, FL 1 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWindsor, NC 1 of 5Winter Park Care And RehabilitationWinter Park, FL 1 of 5Xenia Health And RehabXenia, OH 2 of 5Accordius Health at Rose Manor LLCDurham, NC 2 of 5Barren County Nursing and RehabilitationGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Bellbrook Health And RehabBellbrook, OH 2 of 5Cherokee Park RehabilitationLouisville, KY 2 of 5Clinton PlaceClinton, KY 2 of 5Collierville Nursing And Rehabilitation, LlcCollierville, TN 2 of 5Eden Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterEden, NC 2 of 5Fairpark Health And RehabilitationMaryville, TN 2 of 5Glenview Health and RehabilitationGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Green Acres HealthcareMayfield, KY 2 of 5Jamestown Place Health And RehabJamestown, OH 2 of 5Lilac At Bayview, TheSaint Augustine, FL 2 of 5Madisonville Health and Rehabilitation, LLCMadisonville, KY 2 of 5Midtown Center For Health And RehabilitationMemphis, TN 2 of 5Pelican Health at CharlotteCharlotte, NC 2 of 5River Grove Health And RehabilitationLoudon, TN 2 of 5Stonecreek Health and RehabilitationPaducah, KY 2 of 5Sycamore Heights Health and RehabilitationLouisville, KY 2 of 5Venice Health And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL

Showing 40 of 78; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FLYER 3 OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/29/2022
ACM ASHEM HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
FLYER 3 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
FTK FLYER OH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
ZANZIPER FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
CENTERVILLE PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 09/29/2022
KRIESER, AKIVAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/29/2022
MOERMAN, RAFAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
RARICK, JONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/30/2024
ZANZIPER, NATALIEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
GALE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
MED-NET COMPLIANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
NPNH1 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
OVATION REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
SHS KEREN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
THE PAVILION MANAGMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
VERACITY RESOURCING AND SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
DIXON, KOBYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2025
ZANZIPER, NAFTALIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$438K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 1%Other / private 79%

This home reported $438K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$290per resident / day
operating cost
$8,815per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$288per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365764. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next