No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beavercreek Health And Rehab

3854 Park Overlooke Drive, Beavercreek, OH 45431 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (937) 429-9655 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 429-9655 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1010 Woodman Dr · (937) 252-2000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1010 Woodman Dr Ste 100 · (937) 252-9100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI<0.1 mi
Airway Rd · (630) 879-8100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Bark Park0.1 mi
I38 02007 0080 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight16.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms32.7%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.4%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.8%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.0%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.5%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.57U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.3%CMS range 29.5–55.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.6–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge78.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.4–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
67.1%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 61.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-26)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital records, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer via a mechanical Hoyer lift. This resulted in Actual Harm on 12/16/25, when one staff member transferred Resident #63 via Hoyer lift and the Hoyer pad broke causing the resident to fall, which resulted in fractures of her bilateral femurs and a Lumber #1 (L1) fracture to her spine, requiring admission to the hospital for surgical repair to her bilateral femurs. This affected one (Resident #63) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 62.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 02/27/24 with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan identified a resident's fall risk and included interventions to reduce the risk of falling. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 61. Findings include:Review of Resident #4's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 04/06/26. Diagnoses listed included anxiety, hypertension, depression, lung cancer, and seizures. Resident #4 was discharged from the facility on 04/13/26.Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for toileting and bathing. Review of a baseline care plan dated 04/06/26 revealed Resident #4 had a history of falls and was at risk. The review also revealed there were no interventions listed regarding Resident #4's fall risk. Review of fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had one to two falls in the past three months and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate water temperatures throughout the building were maintained. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 62.Findings included:Observations made throughout the facility on 02/17/26 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:34 A.M. revealed water temperatures measured 99.2 degrees Fahrenheit in the Red spa room. Water temperatures measured above 120 degrees Fahrenheit in resident rooms 105, 108, 205, 216, 307, 308, 310, and 315.During an interview on 02/17/26 at 9:34 A.M., the Director of Maintenance #119 stated water temperatures were expected to be kept between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit throughout the facility.Observations made on 02/18/26 between 4:35 P.M. and 4:52 P.M. revealed the following water temperatures: room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 106 degrees Fahrenheit, room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 116 degrees Fahrenheit, room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 110 degrees Fahrenheit, room [ROOM NUMBER] measured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to assess and implement new interventions after an unstageable pressure ulcer was found on Resident #16's left foot. This affected one (Resident #16) of three residents reviewed for pressure wounds. The facility census was 62. Medical record review for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 07/17/25 with diagnoses including quadriplegia and polyneuropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was dependent for bathing, dressing, and positioning. Review of the care plan for Resident #16 revealed the resident is at risk for pressure ulcers. Interventions included weekly skin checks, floating heels, turning and repositioning, pressure reducing mattress, and wheelchair cushion. Review of the nursing notes dated 12/21/25 revealed that while Resident #16 was being provided a bed bath, a wound measuring 2.9 x 2 x.2 was found on the the ball…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders. This affected two (Residents #05 and #08) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 62.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 03/21/25 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left foot with fat layer exposed, chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders revealed the following:-An order dated 03/22/25 for Repatha Subcutaneous Solution Prefilled Syringe (Evolocumab). Inject 140 mg/ml subcutaneously one time a day every 21 day(s) for hyperlipidemia every 3 weeks with a discontinue date of 05/24/25.-An order dated 05/24/25 for Repatha Subcutaneous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record record review and staff interview the facility failed to document discharge planning for one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 69 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 09/19/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and depression, and a discharge date of 06/11/25. Review of her the care plan for Resident #27 dated 01/08/25 revealed the resident had planned to be at the facility for a short time and wanted assistance in planning steps to be able to return home safely. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #27 dated 04/04/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up or supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of a 30-day discharge notice for Resident #27 dated 05/12/25 revealed the was being discharged for non-payment of services and would be going to her sister's home.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and online information on pressure ulcers from Medscape the facility failed to timely treat pressure wounds. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 07/18/25 with diagnoses including stage four pressure ulcer, stroke, liver cirrhosis, and depression and a discharge date of 07/22/25.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 07/22/25 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADLs.)Review of the admission assessment for Resident #10 dated 07/18/25 revealed the resident had a left heel pressure ulcer which measured two centimeters (cm) in length by two in width with the depth not measured and the resident had a left outer ankle pressure ulcer which measured two cm in length by two cm in width with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of recorded video footage, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff timely reported falls, failed to assess residents for injuries following falls, and failed to investigate falls. This affected one (Resident #17) of three residents reviewed for falls. Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented per the resident care plan. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 69 residents.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, depression, anxiety and psychotic disorder with delusions. The resident expired on [DATE].Review of the care plan for Resident #17 initiated on [DATE] revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to multiple comorbidities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a newly identified skin issue was assessed timely and treatments were initiated. The facility also failed to ensure treatments to a pressure ulcer were completed as ordered. This affected one (#30) out of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 12/03/2020 with medical diagnoses of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, chronic respiratory failure, left hemiplegia, vascular dementia, anxiety, and depression. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/01/24, which indicated Resident #30 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS indicated Resident #30 did not have a pressure ulcer. Review of medical record for Resident #30 revealed physician orders dated 10/10/24 for left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (#75) out of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dementia with psychosis, paranoid schizophrenia, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 enrolled onto Hospice services [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #75 had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum assistance for eating and bed mobility and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #75 did not transfer during the review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for a resident in Contact Precautions. This affected one (#13) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/10/24 with medical diagnoses of alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic Hepatitis C, resistant to multiple antibiotics, and carrier or suspected carrier of Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/16/24, which indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance for all activities of daily living. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed a physician order dated 09/10/24 for Contact Precautions. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed physician orders dated 09/12/24 to cleanse right lateral calf, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dairy products were served at the appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect 68 residents in the facility. The facility identified two residents (#08 and #21) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Observation on 09/25/34 at 8:06 A.M. of the dining area on the facility's Red unit revealed fifteen trays lined up on the counter. Each tray contained a meal ticket, silverware, insulating covers, and a carton of milk. Observation on 09/25/24 at 8:25 A.M. revealed dietary staff started trayline, plating food and placing it in the insulated covers. Continued observation revealed nine trays were placed on a cart and delivered to the residents by the staff. Further observation revealed dietary staff placed an additional four trays on a cart for delivery. Observation on 09/25/24 at 8:41 A.M. revealed the milk on the tray of Resident #23 was 46.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview at the same time, Dietary Aid (DA) #349 verified the milk on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner to prevent against the potential spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 68 residents in the facility. The facility identified two residents (#08 and #21) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1) Observation on 09/23/24 at approximately 8:20 A.M. of the facility's walk-in cooler revealed gray and white speckled areas throughout the eight wire shelves and several plastic milk crates. Further observation revealed a puddle of brown liquid, measuring approximately two feet by two feet, on the floor below a box of potatoes, which was positioned on the lowest shelf of a wire rack. A large box of cucumbers was observed on the top shelf of the rack and was leaking onto the shelves below and into the box of potatoes. Interview at the same time, Dietary Staff (DS) #306 stated the gray and white speckled areas throughout the cooler were mold and stated it had just started. DS #306 verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and record review, facility failed to document and follow up on resident concerns from the resident council meetings. This affected seven (#09, #19, #26, #30, #56, #62, and #221) residents who participated in resident council. The facility census was 70. Findings include 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #09 revealed an admission date of 05/06/19. Resident #09 was cognitively intact. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 10/25/21. Resident #19 was cognitively intact. 3) Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 02/05/24. Resident #26 was cognitively intact. 4) Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 01/27/20. Resident #30 was cognitively intact. 5) Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 02/27/24. Resident #56 was cognitively intact. 6) Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 03/12/24. Resident #62 had mild cognitive impairment. 7) Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat all residents with dignity and respect. This affected two (#28, and #29) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 70. Findings Include: 1) Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/24. Diagnoses included dysphasia, atrial fibrillation, and hemiplegia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #28 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with eating. Observation of Resident #28 on 09/23/24 at 11:30 A.M., revealed he was in the dining room/lounge area with other residents and the afternoon meal was being served by the staff. All the other residents were served their lunch, and they were eating with the exception of Resident #28. Resident #28 continued to face the other residents as they were eating, including another resident seated at the same table. At 12:10 P.M., Resident #28 still wasn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of code status in the medical record. This affected three (#29, #32, and #58) of nineteen residents reviewed for advanced directives. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record of Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 06/27/23. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and hypertension. Review of the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order form located in the paper (hard) chart dated 09/28/23 for Resident #58, revealed the resident was to be a DNR-Comfort Care-Arrest (CCA). Review of the physician orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #58 revealed an order dated 10/05/23 for the resident to be a Full Code. Interview on 09/23/24 at 3:45 P.M., Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This affected one (#18) resident of one reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 70. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 03/22/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, dysphagia, heart failure, unspecified psychosis, respiratory failure and morbid obesity. Observation on 09/23/24 at 1:18 P.M., revealed Resident #18 had a large hole in the drywall behind her bed. Resident had a bariatric bed and a board affixed to the wall behind her bed to protect the drywall from damage from the bed. On the right side of the board was damage to the drywall with estimated size of about six inches by 18 inches. Interview on 09/26/24 at 12:50 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #364, verified damage to the drywall. MD #364 revealed he had not been informed of the damage. MD #364 stated the damage was significant enough where a patch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with notification indicating the reason for transfer upon a transfer to the hospital. This affected three (#21, #43, and #56) residents of the four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 70. Finding included: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 12/07/24. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, heart failure, cellulitis, kidney failure, and edema. Review of Resident #43's admission census record revealed the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 03/13/24, again from 04/13/24 to 05/06/24 and 08/13/24 to 08/14/24. Further record review found no documented evidence of Resident #43 nor Resident #43's representative being provided with a notification for reason of transfer for any of these three hospitalizations. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 02/27/24. Diagnoses included cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, facility failed to ensure residents were provided with bed hold notification upon a transfer to the hospital. This affected three (#21, #43, and #56) residents of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 70. Finding included: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 12/07/24. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, heart failure, cellulitis, kidney failure, and edema. Review of Resident #43's census record revealed the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 03/13/24 and again from 04/13/24 to 05/06/24. Review of a Bed Hold Notice dated 03/13/2/4 revealed Resident #43 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 03/13/24. The form was provided to the resident on the date of discharge from the hospital and therefore was not provided timely and upon admission to the hospital. Review of a Bed Hold Notice dated 05/06/24 revealed Resident #43 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 05/06/24. The form was provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of hospital records, the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility timely following a hospital stay. This affected one (#43) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 70. Finding included: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 12/07/24. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, heart failure, cellulitis, kidney failure, and edema. Review of Resident #43 census revealed the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 08/14/24. Review of a nurse's progress note for Resident #43 dated 08/13/24 at 4:49 P.M., revealed the resident was sent to hospital for critical laboratory findings (labs) per the Nurse Practitioner (NP). Review of a nurse's progress note for Resident #43 dated 08/14/24 at 10:57 A.M. revealed the resident returned home from the hospital with a new order for Levaquin 500 milligrams (mg) once daily for seven days for urinary tract infection (UTI) and Pneumonia.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adaptive equipment as ordered. This affected one (#55) of one resident reviewed for adaptive equipment. The facility identified ten residents who utilized adaptive equipment. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 05/25/23. Diagnoses included dementia and oropharyngeal dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #55 utilized a provale cup for safe intake of thin liquids and was assessed as independent with the use of the provale cup. Review of a physician order for Resident #55 revealed an order dated 03/12/24 for a regular, dysphagia mechanical soft diet with regular liquid consistency and a provale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of medical records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse communicated a resident incident, that was later determined to be a fall, to the oncoming licensed nurse to allow for ongoing monitoring and/or potentially prevent further incidents or falls. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/02/23. Diagnoses listed included anxiety disorder, right femur fracture, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and repeated falls. Review of a quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #2 had not had any reported falls. Review of progress notes dated 06/12/24 at 1:14 P. M revealed when nurse went into Resident #2's room to pass medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure treatments (i.e. moon boots) were in place as prescribed. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for treatment implementation. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #30 revealed admission date of 01/17/23 with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 on 01/11/24 indicating intact cognition. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, heart failure, schizophrenia, depression, dementia with psychotic disturbances and insomnia. Resident #30 remains in the facility. Review of Resident #30's physician orders revealed an order for moon boots to both feet every shift with a start date of 11/02/23. Observation on 01/22/24 with State Tested Nursing Assistant STNA #30 at 3:26 P.M. revealed Resident #30 did not have his moon boots on. STNA #30 verified Resident #30's moon boots were not on and a search of the room revealed they were not present. STNA #30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and pharmacy interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected two (#30 and #60) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #30 revealed admission date of 01/17/23 with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 on 01/11/24 indicating intact cognition. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, heart failure, schizophrenia, depression, dementia with psychotic disturbances and insomnia. Resident #30 remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he required set up for meals, dependent for bathing, toileting and substantial assistance for bed mobility. Observation on 01/23/23 at 10:10 A.M. of medication pass by Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #117 for Resident #30 revealed Potassium Chloride (hypokalemia) packet 10 Milliequivalent (MEQ) was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation regarding nursing assessments and/or the circumstances surrounding a residents hospitalization was documented in the medical record. This affected one (#84) of three residents medical records reviewed for hospitalization. Facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #84 revealed admission date of 04/26/23. Diagnoses include femur fracture and hypertension. Resident #84 was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, toileting, transfers occurred only once or twice and eating required supervision. The MDS documented Resident #84 was discharged to an acute hospital. Record review of the progress notes for Resident #84 revealed there was no documentation for his hospitalization, and/or him leaving the facility. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility menu, observations, resident and staff interviews, review of recipes, the facility failed to provide nutritious and palatable meals to residents. This had the potential to affect 67 residents in the facility who received meals prepared in the kitchen. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of the facility menu dated 12/28/23 revealed the breakfast meal included waffles, sausage, and oatmeal. Observation on 12/28/23 at 8:30 A.M. of the 400 Unit service line for breakfast revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #140 opened a plastic bag of thawed waffles which were sitting in a warmer tray. DA #140 placed a waffle onto a resident's plate. Interview on 12/27/23 at 8:30 A.M. of DA #140 confirmed the waffles came frozen and were steamed in their original packaging and then plated to serve to the residents. Observation of a test tray on 12/28/23 at 8:35 A.M. revealed the frozen waffle was light yellow in color with no toaster marks and was soft and wet. The sausage link was dark brown in color, hard, and difficult to cut. Interview on 12/28/23 at 8:35 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had access to their call light. This affected one (Resident #10) of two residents reviewed for call light access. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, and seizures. Resident #10 was paralyzed to the left side of her body. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had cognitive impairment. Her functional status was listed as extensive to totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Observations on 11/02/23 at 12:00 P.M. of Resident #10 with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #161 revealed Resident #10's call light was laying on her paralyzed side, dropped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, facility failed to ensure physician ordered nutritional supplements were provided as ordered. This affected one (Resident #46) of three reviewed for nutritional supplements. The facility census was 71. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/21/19. Diagnoses included heart failure, depression, acute embolism, anemia, anxiety and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively impaired and required limited assistance with eating. Review of Resident #46's physician orders for July 2023 revealed an order dated 06/20/23 for house supplement, 120 milliliters (ml) to be given three times daily. Additionally, there was an active order for a health shake, three times daily with meals. Review of the plan of care dated 06/16/23 revealed Resident #46 was at risk for weight loss and malnutrition with interventions in place to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, policy review, staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored. This had the potential to affect four residents (#12, #14, #54, and #65) who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/25/23 7:04 A.M. revealed two unidentified pills in a medicine cup left unattended on the 200 hall medication cart. No staff was noted in the hall. Interview on 01/25/23 at 7:08 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #708 verified Protonix (acid reflux) and a multivitamin were left unattended. 2. Observation on 01/30/23 at 10:09 A.M. revealed an unidentified nurse walked away from the medication cart and left the unit. The medication cart was observed unlocked. Interview on 01/30/23 at 10:11 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #340 verified the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. ADON #340 verified medication carts should be locked when unattended. Review of the facility's list of residents revealed Resident #12, #14, #54, and #65 were cognitively impaired and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore hairnets while in food preparation areas and failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified four resident (#10, #11, #55, and #57) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/23/23 at 7:12 A.M., upon entrance into the kitchen, revealed several dietary staff members standing around the food prep area. Four employees were observed not wearing hairnets: [NAME] #310, Dietary Assistant (DA) #301, [NAME] #300, and [NAME] #315. All employees listed verified they were not wearing hairnets at the time of the observation. Interview on 01/25/23 12:02 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #342 confirmed a hairnet should be applied immediately upon entrance to the kitchen. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Basic Safe Food Handling revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician records were readily accessible. This affected six (#4, #26, #38, #50, #70, and #276) of 24 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/31/21. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, cellulitis of left lower limb, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep vein of left lower extremity, schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, non-pressure chronic ulcer, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic dermatitis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the medical record from September 2022 to 01/29/23 = revealed physician and/or certified nurse practitioner (CNP) notes were unavailable for review. Interview on 01/30/23 at 4:33 P.M. with Regional Nurse Coordinator #409 verified physician notes for Resident #26 were not able to be located at the facility and were not available in Resident #26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure preadmission screening and resident reviews (PASARR) were completed accurately and the facility failed to ensure residents were re-screened for Level II services when given a new mental health diagnosis. This affected two (#15 and #57) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 71. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 06/07/21. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder with psychotic features, schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/26/22, revealed the resident had adequate short and long-term memory and was independent with cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident was assessed as not having any behaviors. Review of the PASARR dated 06/05/21 revealed section D was checked no for indications of serious mental illness, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated timely status post a resident's fall and failed to conduct quarterly care conferences timely. This affected three (#12, #39, and #68) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date 08/26/17. Diagnoses included chronic isocheimic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Alzheimer's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 enrolled into Hospice services on 11/22/21. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #14 received Hospice services. Review of the progress notes for Resident #14 dated 05/04/22 and 08/03/22, revealed care conference were conducted with son via phone. The documentation did not support the Hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete discharge summary and recapitulation of stay for residents who discharged from the facility. This affected two (#71 and #73) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 12/18/22. Diagnoses included wedge compression fracture of second and third lumbar vertebra, anemia, retention of urine, and COVID-19. Resident #71 discharged to the community on 01/18/23. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact. Resident #71 required extensive assist from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Further review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed no documentation to support the facility completed a discharge summary or recapitulation of stay upon Resident #71's discharge to community on 01/18/23. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents that required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) received adequate assistance with bathing and repositioning. This affected three (#38, #68, and #276) of six residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility identified 69 residents who required assistance with ADLs. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 08/13/22. Diagnoses included stroke with hemiplegia affecting the left non dominant side, depression, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had intact cognition. Resident #68 required extensive one person assistance for bathing. Review of the care plan dated 08/25/22 revealed Resident #68 required assistance with ADLs related to her stroke, blindness, and weakness and required assistance of staff as needed when requested. Review of the December 2022 and January 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observation, record review and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician orders and failed to initiate treatment orders for wound care. This affected three (Residents #16, #28, and #276) of twenty-four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/09/17. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the physician orders dated 02/08/20 revealed Resident #16 had an order for Aspercream patch (treats pain): Apply one patch to bilateral shoulders daily in the morning and remove at bedtime. Review of the medication administration record dated January 2023 revealed Resident #16 had received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, eye center interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate care to maintain vision. This affected one (Resident #12) of two residents review for vision services. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 11/20/20. Diagnoses included stage III chronic kidney disease, type I diabetes mellitus, and heart failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact and did not reject care. Review of the care plan dated 03/25/19 revealed Resident #19 had age-related visual changes which placed her at risk for injury. Interventions included to assist with glasses placement/cleaning, encourage involvement in activities, set up and provide cueing assistance as needed, and vision exams as needed. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 received an eye exam on 09/23/22. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the care and services to prevent a pressure ulcer and the facility failed to initiate physician's orders to treat a pressure ulcer in a timely manner. This affected two (#28 and #70) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified nine residents with current pressure ulcers. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/31/21. Resident #26 began receiving hospice services on 11/22/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, cellulitis of left lower limb, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep vein of left lower extremity, non-pressure chronic ulcer, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic dermatitis, and chronic peripheral venous sufficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a fall prevention was in place for a resident at risk for falls. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/01/18. Diagnoses included dementia with behaviors, anxiety, depression, anorexia and non traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #3 required extensive two person assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan, initiated 10/03/18, revealed Resident #3 was at risk for falls related to poor safety awareness, Alzheimer's disease, and a decrease in functional mobility. Interventions included bed in low position (initiated on 03/18/21), a contour mattress and mat beside bed. Observation on 01/23/23 at 3:36 P.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely to residents. This affected two (Residents #4 and #50) of three residents reviewed for incontinent care. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #4 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, chronic back/knee pain, hypertension, hypothyroidism irritable bowel syndrome, anxiety, and left knee pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility. Resident #4 was dependent on staff for transfers and was incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the incontinence care plan, dated 01/19/23, revealed Resident #4 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to cerebral palsy. The interventions included to check and change for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to lighting level was adequate and comfortable in a facility dining room. This had the potential to affect 11 (#10, #13, #17, #21, #23, #26, #36, #50, #48, #50 and #63) residents residing in the red dining room. The facility census was 73. Finding include: Interview on 12/30/19 at 4:34 P.M., revealed Resident #63 reported the lights in the red dining room have been out and been reported in the resident council meetings. Resident #63 reported the facility would always say they would handle it. Resident #63 continued to say when the chandeliers are on it makes the dining room warmer. Resident #63 reported ceiling lights were not working but if working would brighten up the dining room. Observation on 12/30/19 at 4:55 P.M., revealed red dining room had five ceiling lights not working. The chandeliers were positioned about two to three feet away from the residents' head. Chandeliers lights were on low. Residents (#10, #13, #17, #21, #23, #26, #36, #50, #48, #50 and #63) were in the dining room eating dinner.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a dignified dining experience while feeding cognitive impaired residents. This affected one (Resident #39) out of one reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder recurrent, dysphagia oral phase, cognitive communication deficit, repeated falls, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, anxiety, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/19, revealed Resident #39 had severely impaired cognitive deficits, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, and was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowels. Observations on 12/30/19 at 10:30 A.M., revealed Resident #39 was sitting in the common area with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-03 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and facility staff interview the facility failed to accurately code minimum data set (MDS). This affected one (Resident #217) of 22 residents records reviewed during the annual survey. The total facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of Resident #217's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizo affective disorder depressive type, traumatic brain injury, diabetes mellitus type two, acute osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, and weakness. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had no delusions nor hallucinations but had rejection of care one to three days of the review period. The resident was coded as having traumatic brain injury, and psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. The resident was coded as receiving seven days of antipsychotic medication, seven days antidepressant, and seven days of antibiotics. The resident received four days of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's baseline care plan was accurate regarding the resident's skin, safety and elopement risk/interventions. This affected one (#217) of 13 new admission care plans reviewed. The total facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #217's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis that include but are not limited to schizo affective disorder depressive type, traumatic brain injury, diabetes mellitus type two, acute osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, and weakness. Review of Resident #217's progress note revealed on 12/12/19 at 3:15 P.M. the resident had an admission note that revealed the resident assessment was completed and resident was alert and forgetful, unable to read with garbled speech intermittently. Resident blood sugar was 169, with no signs of hyperglycemia. Skin was assessed with left large toe posterior open wound one by one inch open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided shaving assistance. This affected one (Resident #10) of four reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The total facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/19. Diagnoses included dementia, schizoaffective disorder, muscle weakness, convulsions, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, osteoarthritis and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was severely impaired and required extensive assist of two for bed mobility and transfers. He was totally dependent for toileting, eating, personal hygiene and dressing. Resident #10 had unclear speech and rarely makes self-understood. Review of the plan of care dated 10/09/19 revealed Resident #10 had self-care impairment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with activities in accordance with the resident's preferences including providing a newly admitted resident with an activity calendar identifying activities provided by the facility. This affected one (#120) of one reviewed for activities. The total facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #120's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hip surgery, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, history of cancer and obesity. The resident is noted to be alert and oriented and able to make needs known. Review of the residents' activities admission assessment revealed the assessment was put in the computer on 12/31/19. Resident #120's likes are listed as read books on her tablet, is interested in the senior center, no interest in crafts, likes hallmark channel and smooth jazz. Enjoys outings with friends and families, euchre, games…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide ordered skin care. This affected one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed for non pressure skin alteration. The total facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but are not limited to diabetes type two, weakness, cellulitis of right lower limb, cellulitis of left lower limb, urinary tract infection lymphedema, multiple sclerosis and obesity. Review of the 10/01/19 quarterly minimum data set revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors delusions or hallucinations or rejection of care. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of care plans revealed the resident had altered skin integrity non pressure related to moisture associated skin dermatitis (MASD) to bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-03 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, facility staff and physician interview and review of Self Reported Incident (SRI) the facility failed to meet the behavioral health needs of residents. This affected one (Resident #217) of two reviewed for behavioral emotional services. The total facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #217's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizo affective disorder depressive type, traumatic brain injury,diabetes mellitus type two, acute osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, and weakness. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had no delusions or hallucinations but had rejection of care one to three days of the review period. The resident was coded as having traumatic brain injury, and psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. The resident was coded as receiving seven days of antipsychotic medication,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities were identified by the pharmacist. This affected one (Resident #217) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #217's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included schizo affective disorder depressive type, traumatic brain injury, diabetes mellitus type two, acute osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, and weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had no delusions, hallucinations but had rejection of care one to three days of the review period. The resident was coded as having traumatic brain injury, and psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. The resident was coded as receiving seven days of antipsychotic medication, seven days antidepressant, and seven days of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record reveiw and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected Resident #217 who had orders for an antiphyscotic upon dischage from the hospital. The order was not followed up on and the resident was not adminsiterd the mediation while at the facility for eight days. This affected one (Resident #217) of two reviewed for behavioral emotional services. The total facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of Resident #217's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizo affective disorder depressive type, traumatic brain injury,diabetes mellitus type two, acute osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, and weakness. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had no delusions or hallucinations but had rejection of care one to three days of the review period. The resident was coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired. The facility identified two residents (#52 and #54) who had orders for Vitamin D and lived on the 300 unit, there were no residents identified who received Aspirin 325 milligrams (mg). The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 11:17 A.M. of the blue medication storage room revealed nine bottles of enteric coated Aspirin 325 mg with 100 tablets. Each bottle had an expiration date of 07/2019. There were also two bottles of Vitamin D 400 International Units (IU) with 100 tablets. Each bottle had an expiration date of 11/2019. Interview at the time of the observation with Corporate Clinical Nurse #700 verified the nine bottles of enteric coated aspirin and two bottles of Vitamin D were all expired and should have been removed from the medication storage room and discarded. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage, Storage of Medication, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-02-01 · tag F0847 — widespread
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's Binding Arbitration Agreement failed to explicitly grant the resident or resident representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing the agreement. This affected four (#9, #22, #68, and #276) residents reviewed for Binding Arbitration Agreements. The facility had 41 residents who had signed a Binding Arbitration Agreements. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 06/03/21. Diagnoses included dementia, major depression, peripheral vascular disease, idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #9's Voluntary Arbitration Agreement revealed the agreement was signed on 06/04/21 by Resident #9's representative. It stated the agreement may be canceled by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 78 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bradford Heights Nursing & RehabilitationHopkinsville, KY 1 of 5Centerville Health And RehabDayton, OH 1 of 5Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterClayton, NC 1 of 5Dade City Health And Rehabilitation CenterDade City, FL 1 of 5Englewood Health And RehabEnglewood, OH 1 of 5Fulton Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLCFulton, KY 1 of 5Gainesville Health and RehabilitationGainesville, FL 1 of 5Garden View Health And Rehabilitation CenterVero Beach, FL 1 of 5Hertford Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterHertford, NC 1 of 5Longwood Health And Rehabilitation CenterLongwood, FL 1 of 5Lotus Village Center for Nursing and RehabilitatioSparta, NC 1 of 5Magnolia Creek Nursing And RehabilitationCovington, TN 1 of 5Mills Nursing & RehabilitationMayfield, KY 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Health and RehabilitationMonticello, KY 1 of 5Naples Health And Rehabilitation CenterNaples, FL 1 of 5Southpoint Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Spring View Nursing & RehabilitationLeitchfield, KY 1 of 5Sunrise Point Health And Rehabilitation CenterRockledge, FL 1 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWindsor, NC 1 of 5Winter Park Care And RehabilitationWinter Park, FL 1 of 5Xenia Health And RehabXenia, OH 2 of 5Accordius Health at Rose Manor LLCDurham, NC 2 of 5Barren County Nursing and RehabilitationGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Bellbrook Health And RehabBellbrook, OH 2 of 5Cherokee Park RehabilitationLouisville, KY 2 of 5Clinton PlaceClinton, KY 2 of 5Collierville Nursing And Rehabilitation, LlcCollierville, TN 2 of 5Eden Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterEden, NC 2 of 5Fairpark Health And RehabilitationMaryville, TN 2 of 5Glenview Health and RehabilitationGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Green Acres HealthcareMayfield, KY 2 of 5Jamestown Place Health And RehabJamestown, OH 2 of 5Lilac At Bayview, TheSaint Augustine, FL 2 of 5Madisonville Health and Rehabilitation, LLCMadisonville, KY 2 of 5Midtown Center For Health And RehabilitationMemphis, TN 2 of 5Pelican Health at CharlotteCharlotte, NC 2 of 5River Grove Health And RehabilitationLoudon, TN 2 of 5Stonecreek Health and RehabilitationPaducah, KY 2 of 5Sycamore Heights Health and RehabilitationLouisville, KY 2 of 5Venice Health And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL

Showing 40 of 78; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FLYER 1 OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/29/2022
ACM ASHEM HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
FLYER 1 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
FTK FLYER OH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
ZANZIPER FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/29/2022
ZANZIPER, NAFTALIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
ZANZIPER, NATALIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
KRIESER, AKIVAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/29/2022
MOERMAN, RAFAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/29/2022
ONONYE, OBINNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2024
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
MED-NET COMPLIANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
OVATION REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
THE PAVILION MANAGMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
BIRNBAUM, EZRAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
CRAGER, MARKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
HIRSCH, SHAYEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
SINGER, SIMONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 21%Medicare 4%Other / private 75%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$319per resident / day
operating cost
$9,684per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366400. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next