Windsor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1306 South King Street, Windsor, NC 27983 · For profit - Corporation · 82 certified beds · (252) 794-5146 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0607) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $249,991 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-06)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.1% | 15.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 17.0% | 7.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 5.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.3% | 18.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.9% | 21.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 94.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.6% | 5.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.4% | 20.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.2% | 14.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.9% | 78.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.3% | 22.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.7% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.77 | 1.78 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.74 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.4%CMS range 28.4–46.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 8.7–17.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.2–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 66.2 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, nurse practitioner interview, physician interview, pharmacist, and psychiatry nurse practitioner interview the facility failed to administer 6 doses of a required antipsychotic medication for one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. Resident #11 had an acute psychotic event after missing 6 doses of his antipsychotic medication resulting in a fall with a broken shoulder and hip that required surgical repair, acute blood loss and acute pain. Resident #11 has been bedbound since the incident. Findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Resident #11 had a physician's order for 200 milligrams (mg) Clozapine, an antipsychotic, to be administered as one tablet by mouth two times a day for paranoid schizophrenia initiated on 7/9/2024. The administration times listed were 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM. Documentation in the manufacturer's label for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, nurse practitioner interview, physician interview, pharmacist interview, and psychiatry nurse practitioner interview the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered and provide laboratory results to the pharmacy as required for antipsychotic medication monitoring for one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. Resident #11 had an acute psychotic event after laboratory results were not obtained and faxed to the pharmacy for the renewal of his antipsychotic medication. Resident #11 suffered a fall with a broken shoulder and hip that required surgical repair, acute blood loss and acute pain. Resident #11 has been bedbound since the incident. Abrupt withdrawal from the medication can cause rebound psychosis (sudden return of psychotic symptoms). Findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Resident #11 had a physician's order for 200…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews with resident, staff and the Physician, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from resident to resident abuse for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #222, Resident #61, and Resident #41). On 10/19/23 Resident #2, a male resident, entered Resident #222's room (a female resident) and punched her in her legs multiple times with a closed fist as she was sitting on her bed. On 6/22/24 Resident #2 punched Resident #61 (a female resident) in the face multiple times with a closed fist at the nurse's station due to the belief that she was cheating on him. Resident #222 and Resident #61 were vulnerable and were unable to protect themselves. The physical abuse had a high likelihood of resulting in serious physical and psychosocial harm. A reasonable person expects to be protected from physical abuse in their home and would suffer trauma such as feelings of fear, anxiety, and intimidation. Additionally, the facility failed to protect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and family interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for physical abuse. Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, was hit with a belt by a family member resulting in three whip-like marks on her left upper thigh and abdomen. A reasonable person would be traumatized by being hit with a belt. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of a genetic-related intellectual disability and a neurological condition. Documentation on a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Resident #1 was not coded as having any moods or behaviors on the MDS assessment. Documentation on a care plan dated as initiated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had an activity of daily living, self-care performance deficit relative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and family interviews, the facility failed to immediately identify abuse and respond to intervene to protect a resident from physical abuse. Facility staff delayed intervention when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, was hit with a belt by a family member resulting in three whip-like marks on her left upper thigh and abdomen and a visit to the emergency room. The facility also failed to notify the state agency within two hours of physical abuse that occurred in the facility. This occurred for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for adherence to abuse policies and procedures during physical abuse investigations. Findings included: a. Documentation on the undated facility abuse policies and procedures revealed under the heading of identification of abuse, neglect, and exploitation, the facility will identify events, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute: . Abuse: The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Pharmacist, Medical Director and Physician interviews, the facility failed to clarify and resolve a discrepancy with an order for carvedilol (medication in the class of alpha and beta blockers used to treat conditions affecting the heart and blood vessels) which resulted in a significant medication error for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #7).Findings included:Resident #7's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed her discharge medications included carvedilol 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily.Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) and heart failure.A physician's order for Resident #7 with a start date of 12/3/25 revealed carvedilol 25 mg by mouth twice daily for essential hypertension.Resident #7's December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed documentation indicating carvedilol 25 mg was administered to Resident #7 twice daily from 12/3/25 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and failed to have a complete and accurate Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 4 of 19 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy (Resident #76, Resident #36, Resident #54, and Resident #51).Findings included: 1. Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #76's physician orders revealed on 8/26/25 the resident had an order entered for his surgical left foot incision to be cleansed with Dakin's (a dilute solution bleach solution used as an antiseptic for wounds), pat dry, collagen particles Dakin's moistened gauze and abdominal gauze roll every day and as needed for wound care. Please read over the highlighted and revise- does not make sense. Review of Resident #76's TAR for September 2025 revealed there was no documented wound care on 9/2/25, 9/8/25, 9/13/25, 9/15/25, and 9/17/25. Review of Resident #76's wound care notes from 8/27/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to: 1.) to follow their infection control practices and procedures for Contact Precautions when Nurse Aide (NA) #1 entered resident's room under contact precautions without wearing a gown or gloves to pick up a meal tray 2.) follow their infection control practices and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact care for a resident with a chronic wound when NA #2 provided a bed bath without wearing a gown and when NA #2 left dirty linens on the floor of the resident's room instead of placing them in a bag and later picked them up and held them against her body. 3.) follow CDC guidance for testing residents exposed to covid 4.) to implement their infection control policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact care for a resident receiving enteral feedings when Nurse #2 failed to don (to put on) personal protective equipment (PPE) to include a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview, the facility failed to obtain consent and inform the resident's Responsible Party (RP) of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications prior to initiation or the treatment alternatives available. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #54). Findings included: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Resident #54's physician orders revealed:- Mirtazapine (antidepressant) 7.5 mg, 1 tablet to be given by mouth at bedtime for depression with a start date of 10/7/25. - Trazodone (antidepressant) oral tablet 100 milligram (mg), 1 tablet to be given by mouth in the afternoon for depression with a start date of 11/13/25. Resident #54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was severely cognitively impaired, had no behaviors and received antidepressant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner (NP), staff and Responsible Party (RP) interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician/medical provider when an ordered medication was unavailable for administration (Resident #51) and failed to notify the resident's RP when a deep tissue pressure injury (DTI) developed on his right heel (Resident #78) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of changes (Resident #51 and Resident #78).Findings included: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM II). Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 9/25 25 revealed she was cognitively intact. A physician's order for Resident #51 with a start date of 10/22/25 and a discontinue date of 12/12/25 revealed Ozempic (semaglutide- medication for management of DM II and weight loss) (1 mg (milligram)/dose) subcutaneous (under the skin) solution pen injector 2 mg/1.5ml. Inject 1 mg subcutaneously one time a day every 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of money from their personal funds' accounts for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Residents #51, #8, and #37).The findings included:a. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility 4/13/23. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was cognitively intact. An interview with Resident #51 on 1/4/26 at 2:17 PM revealed she recalled that in November 2025 her personal funds of $50.00 were not available when requested. She added after asking several times for her funds she did eventually receive the funds on another day.b. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was cognitively intact.On 1/6/26 at 10:55 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #8. He stated the facility had a personal funds account for him and didn't recall a time when he did not receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #51).Findings included:Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2. Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD, the last day of the assessment period) of 9/25/25 revealed she received insulin injections on 7 of the last 7 days.A review of Resident #51's September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed documentation of liraglutide (a non-insulin injectable medication for diabetes mellitus type 2) subcutaneous solution pen injector 1.8 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously (under the skin) one time a day for diabetes mellitus type 2 was administered at 8:00 AM daily from 9/18/25 through 9/25/25.On 1/13/26 at 2:04 PM a telephone interview with MDS Nurse #1 indicated she coded the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, staff, Medical Director and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #51).Findings included:Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM II). Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 9/25 25 revealed she was cognitively intact.A physician's order for Resident #51 with a start date of 10/22/25 and a discontinue date of 12/12/25 revealed Ozempic (semaglutide- medication for management of DM II and weight loss) (1 mg (milligram)/dose) subcutaneous (under the skin) solution pen injector 2 mg/1.5ml. Inject 1 mg subcutaneously one time a day every 7 days related to DM II.On 1/5/26 at 3:15 PM an interview with Resident #51 indicated she was originally supposed to receive her first dose of Ozempic on 10/23/25, but she didn't receive her first dose until December. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Pharmacist, Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner and Physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician was informed of the pharmacy recommendation to clarify a physician's order for carvedilol (medication in the class of alpha and beta blockers used to treat conditions affecting the heart and blood vessels) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #7).Findings included:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) and heart failure.A Report of Consultation document from Resident #7's Cardiologist dated 12/5/25 included a handwritten portion completed and signed by Physician #2 which revealed Resident #7 had coronary and peripheral artery disease (narrowing or blockage of the arteries in the heart and legs, pelvic area or arms). The recommendation was to increase Resident #7's carvedilol to 37.5 mg twice daily and to check Resident #7's blood pressure with a goal of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep medications in a locked treatment cart for 1 of 2 treatment carts observed (Treatment Cart #1).Findings included:During observation on 1/5/26 at 8:32 AM Treatment Cart #1 was observed with the locking mechanism in the unlocked position on the 100-hall outside of a resident's room. The face of the cart was pointed at a resident's room and the resident's room door was open. The privacy curtain was pulled around the resident as well as the Wound Care Nurse. The transport driver was approximately 15 feet away from the unlocked treatment cart and there were no other individuals observed. The surveyor was able to step between the resident's doorway and the unlocked treatment cart without touching the treatment cart. The Wound Care Nurse was behind the privacy curtain and could not be seen by the surveyor. At 8:35 AM the Wound Care Nurse returned to the treatment cart from behind the privacy curtain. During an interview on 1/5/26 at 8:35 AM the Wound Care Nurse stated she was unable to visualize the unlocked treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a consent was documented prior to administering the Influenza vaccination for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccination status (Resident #80).Findings included:Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #80's Medication Administration Record for September 2025 revealed she received the Influenza vaccine on 9/22/25.Review of Resident #80's only immunization consent form in her medical record dated 11/20/25 revealed Resident #80 left the Influenza vaccination selection blank and did not sign consent for the Influenza vaccine. During an interview on 1/8/26 at 10:18 AM the Director of Nursing stated there was no consent on file for Resident #80 regarding the flu vaccination for 9/22/25. She further stated consents should always be acquired prior to administration of a vaccine and maintained in the resident's medical record.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to act in a dignified manner toward (Resident #1) and within hearing distance of (Resident #3) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #1 and Resident #3). Findings included:Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 9/25/2025.Documentation on an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded Resident #1 as cognitively intact.Documentation in a behavior note dated 9/24/2025 at 3:29 PM written by the Administrator revealed, Resident [#1] requested to speak with Administrator concerning nursing care. [Resident #1] became very demanding requesting that the nurse who documented his refusal be brought in to see him. The issue had been addressed and taken care of two weeks ago. When suggesting that we move forward with today's plan of care [Resident #1] became belligerent, stating, you don't tell me to move forward. You can just kiss my [vulgar word]. [Resident #1] was then advised that his tone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and a resident interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse when Resident #3 struck Resident #4, resulting in a bruise to the right side of the face. This occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #4). Findings included:Resident #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE].Documentation on an annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact.Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Documentation on a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had moderately impaired cognition.Documentation in a behavior note for Resident #3 dated 8/27/2025 at 2:45 PM written by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed the following information. The ADON heard yelling in the dining room area and went to the dining room. Resident #3 indicated to the ADON that Resident #4 needed help getting through the doorway in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to: a.) follow their infection control practices and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact care for a resident with a chronic wound when Nurse #1 and Nurse Aide (NA) #1 provided wound care without wearing gowns for 2 of 2 staff observed for infection control (Nurse #1 and NA #1) and b.) to implement their policy for EPB for the current 41 of 61 residents that required the precautions due to chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices. The findings included: The facility policy titled Isolation-Categories of Transmission Based Precautions dated October 2018 stated in part: 1. EBP requires the use of gown and gloves only for high contact resident care activities (unless otherwise indicated as part of Standard Precautions). a.) High contact resident care activities: in the resident room to include: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central line, urinary catheter,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-28 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist who was certified in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Control and Prevention Program. This had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents in the facility. The findings included: During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 5/28/25 at 12:11 PM the ADON indicated she was also the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) and stated she was responsible for oversight of infection control duties. The ADON further stated she had worked at the facility since late February 2025 and had completed 13 of the 20 modules needed to obtain IP certification through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) IP program. The ADON was not aware she had to have IP certification to hold the position of IP. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/28/25 at 1:38 PM she stated she was aware the ADON did not yet have an IP certification and the ADON was working on it through the CDC IP program. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have an effective system in place to train nurses and nurse aides (NAs) and verify their competency with infection control policies for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for training staff on infection control practices and procedures was unaware that residents with chronic wounds and indwelling medical devices required EBP with high contact care. Nurse #1 and NA #1 failed to follow the infection control policy by providing wound care for a resident with chronic wounds without wearing gowns. The facility had 41 residents that required EBP due to chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 staff (ADON/IP, Nurse #1, and NA #1) reviewed for competency and had the potential to affect other facility residents. Findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to: F880: Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to: a.) follow their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity when a resident wore a nightgown and no makeup to an outside appointment making the resident feel angry and unimportant for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 4) reviewed for dignity and respect. Finding included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual [NAME] Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. An interview with the Transportation Driver at 2:37pm on 5/28/2025 revealed Resident #4 was unaware of her appointment on 5/27/25. He stated that he became aware of the appointment at 4:06am by text message from the Scheduler, after he learned about the appointment, he did call the facility and informed the nurse. Transport driver stated it was the nurse's job to provide verbally communicate appointments to residents. He was aware of Resident #4 was unhappy about wearing her night gown to her doctor's appointment and he tried to console Resident #4 by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain evidence of grievance investigation and decisions for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for grievances (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3). Findings included: A review of the facility's grievance policy dated April 2017 stated in part: 4. The investigation and report would include: f.) employee account of the alleged incident and h.) recommendations for corrective action. a.) Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the grievance filed by Resident #1 on 1/3/25 revealed she was concerned that third shift Nurse Aides (NA) did not come in and check on her or answer her call bell. Resident #1 was further concerned that she received dry and burnt food from the kitchen. The grievance was not completed, as there was no documentation regarding an investigation, outcome or recommendation for corrective action. b.) Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the grievance filed by Resident #2 on 12/19/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property in the areas of reporting and investigating when Nurse #2 and Nurse #3 reported to the Unit Manager, Assistant Director of Nursing, and Director of Nursing allegations that Resident #1's liquid morphine appeared to be tampered with and Nurse #1 appeared impaired. These allegations were not reported to the State Agency, law enforcement, or Adult Protective Services (APS) and were not thoroughly investigated. This deficient practice affected 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of property and placed all facility residents who were ordered narcotic medication at risk of misappropriation of property. The findings included: Review of the facility policy Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation last reviewed on [DATE] revealed it was the policy to report all allegations including misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days per week for 9 of 163 days reviewed. Findings included: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report Fiscal Year - Quarter 3, 2024 (April 1-June 30, 2024) revealed the facility had no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 5/15/24, 5/25/24, 5/26/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/8/24, 6/9/24, 6/22/24, and 6/23/24. There were no daily assignment schedules or daily nursing positing available for review for the period that included May 2024 and June 2024. Review of payroll punches revealed no RN's worked any shift on 5/15/24, 5/25/24, 5/26/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/8/24, 6/9/24, 6/22/24, and 6/23/24. a. The time sheets for 5/14/24 were reviewed and no RN had worked any shift on 5/14/24. b. The time sheets for 5/25/24 were reviewed and no RN had worked any shift on 5/25/24. c. The time sheets for 5/26/24 were reviewed and no RN had worked any shift on 5/26/24. d. The time sheets for 6/1/24 were reviewed and no RN had worked any shift on 6/1/24. e. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner when staff referred to a resident who needed assistance with eating as a feeder for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #64). This caused Resident #64 to feel like an animal. Findings included: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #64's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was assessed as cognitively intact. She required set up assistance with meals. Resident #64's care plan dated 10/6/24 revealed she was care planned to require assistance to total care with activities of daily living. The interventions included staff to provide assistance with meals. During a dining observation on 10/7/24 at 12:35 PM Nurse Aide #5 was observed to enter Resident #64's room and stated Resident #64 was a feeder within hearing range of Resident #64 as she provided the lunch tray to the resident. During an interview on 10/7/24 at 12:36 PM Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of clean mechanical lift pads were available to allow a resident to get out of bed in accordance with his preference (Resident #65) and failed to allow a resident who was assessed as a safe independent smoker to smoke in accordance with her preference (Resident #41). This was for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for self-determination. Findings included: 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident #65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. He was dependent for transfers. A review of Resident #65's care plan dated last revised 9/16/24 revealed a problem area of activities of daily living self-performance deficit. The goal was for Resident #65 to maintain his current level of function through the next review. An intervention was to praise all efforts at self-care. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a complete CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) by omitting the estimated cost for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Resident #49). Findings included: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy and dementia. Medicare part A services began the day of admission. Review of Resident # 49's record indicated the SNF ABN dated 6/22/24 had no estimated cost documented on the form. The last covered date was 6/26/24 and Resident #49 remained in the facility. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 49 was assessed as severely cognitively impaired. During an interview on 10/8/24 at 11:33 AM Social Worker #1 stated the estimated cost on the SNF ABN should be completed to ensure the residents or family have the cost provided to them to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to submit a 5-day investigation report (Resident #172) and an initial 24 hour and 5-day investigation report to the State Agency and report to Adult Protective Services (APS) and local law enforcement after allegations of misappropriation of property (Resident #3). This was for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings included: 1. Resident #172 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] A review of an initial 24 hour report dated as submitted to the State Agency on 12/1/23 at 3:51 PM written by the facility's previous Director of Nursing (DON) #2 indicated the facility became aware on 12/1/23 at 1:15 PM that Resident #172 reported a missing bank card and $10.00. Resident #172 had immediately called his bank to have his card cancelled, and the card had not been used. A search for the missing items was conducted, and the items had not been found. A review of the facility's investigation folder of the 12/1/23 allegation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to code cognition, mood, and behavior for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #66). The findings included: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia. Resident #66's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], a quarterly assessment revealed he was not assessed for cognition, mood and behaviors. An interview was conducted with the facility Social Worker on 10/9/24 at 10:26 AM who stated she was responsible for conducting the cognition, mood, and behavior section of the assessment. She reported that she could not recall the reason she did not assess Resident #66 for cognition, mood and behavior. The Social Worker stated it may have been an oversight. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 10/11/24 at 10:10 AM who stated Resident #24's assessment should have been completed accurately.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included the use of a mechanical lift device for transfers for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #65) whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. Findings included: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident #65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. He was dependent for transfers. A review of Resident #65's comprehensive care plan dated last revised on 9/16/24 did not reveal any information regarding his use of a mechanical lift device for 2 person dependent transfers or any other transfer status. On 10/7/24 at 2:36 PM an interview with Resident #65 indicated he used a mechanical lift with 2 person assistance for his transfers. A review of Resident #65's [NAME] (an informational sheet) dated 10/8/24 did not reveal any information regarding his use of a mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Physician, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to update care plan interventions (Resident # 2) and invite residents to care plan meetings (Resident # 43 and Resident #11) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings included: a. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired and other behavioral symptoms not directed at others. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #2 initiated on 4/7/23, identified problems of: Behaviors including swinging at staff, yelling, history of throwing himself on the floor for attention, kicking and hitting at staff, wandering in and out of other resident's rooms, resident to resident altercation and pushing equipment forcefully. The goal was that the resident would have no negative outcomes related to behaviors through the next review. Current interventions included one on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility without staff knowledge for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2). Resident #2 exited the building through a back door and was found by a staff member sitting outside in his wheelchair facing the door. Findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision or touching assistance with wheelchair mobility. Resident #2 was not coded with wandering behaviors. The care plan for Resident #2, initiated on 4/7/23 and updated on 9/29/23, identified a problem of exit seeking and wandering. The goal was the resident would have no negative outcomes related to exit seeking or wandering through the next review. On 9/29/23 an intervention was added for a Wanderguard alarm system (a sensor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Resident #322 was driven to her physician's office in time to attend an 11:00 AM medical appointment. Resident #322 arrived one- and one-half hours late and the physician was unable to see her. The appointment had to be rescheduled for the following week. This deficient practice affected 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for medically related social services (Resident # 322). The findings included: Resident #322 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included an acquired absence of her right leg. Resident #322's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact with no moods or behaviors. An interview was conducted with Resident #322 on 10/9/24 at 9:45 AM who stated she had an appointment on 4/16/24 at 11:00 AM to have the staples removed from her right leg. She stated she arrived at her appointment two hours late and the doctor could not see her. Her appointment was rescheduled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date an opened vial of influenza vaccine stored in the medication room refrigerator for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed. Finding included: An observation of the medication storage room was made on 10/9/24 at 8:40 am in the presence of the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). An opened 5 milliliter multidose vial of Flucelvax 2024-2025 influenza vaccine was in the refrigerator. The protective plastic cap/tab had been removed and the rubber stopper was noted to have needle entry marks. There was no open date or discard date marked on the vaccine vial. During an interview with the ADON on 10/09/24 at 8:50 am she stated the opened influenza vial should have been labeled with the nurse's initial, date opened, and a discard date that should have been 28 days after it was opened. She stated she did not know when the vial was opened but thought it was 2 weeks ago. The ADON discarded the opened, unlabeled vial. In an interview with the Administrator on 10/11/24 at 11:44 am she stated she expected all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and physician interviews the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccine to a resident with a signed consent form to receive the vaccine. This was for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #61). Findings included: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was severely cognitively impaired. Her pneumococcal vaccine was not up to date because it had not been offered. A review Resident #61's Pneumococcal Immunization Consent Form dated 9/10/24 revealed in part the date of Resident #61's last pneumococcal vaccination was unknown. It further revealed Resident #61's Responsible Party (RP) accepted pneumococcal vaccine immunization for Resident #61. A review of Resident #61's medical record did not reveal any evidence a pneumococcal vaccine had been administered to her since her admission to the facility. On 10/11/24 at 10:12 AM an interview with the Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to allow residents who were assessed to be safe smokers the ability to smoke independently per their individual preference for 2 of 8 residents (Resident # 38, and #41) reviewed for preferences. The findings included: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #38's Smoking Agreement dated 2/24/2023 revealed he could smoke independently. A review of Resident #38's Annual Care Plan dated 3/30/2023 revealed Resident #38 could smoke unsupervised. A review of the smoking assessments for Resident #38 dated 10/7/2022, 1/22/2023, and 6/8/2023 revealed he was a safe smoker and did not require supervision. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 to be cognitively intact. An interview with Resident #38 on 8/7/2023 at 10:39 a.m. revealed he was required to be supervised at smoke times since June 2023. Resident #38 revealed he had been assessed multiple times by the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to obtain post dialysis vital signs as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #33). Findings included: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #33's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 3/28/23 for vital signs post dialysis in the afternoon every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #33 had severe cognitive impairment. He was also coded for dialysis. Review of Resident #33's care plan last revised on 5/05/23 included a focus for renal insufficiency with an intervention to monitor for signs and symptoms of hypovolemia or hypervolemia (fluid imbalances) which included increased pulse, increased respirations, and increased blood pressure. Review of Resident #33's July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to date opened insulin for 2 of 3 (Hall 200 and Hall 300) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings included: 1a. Hall 200 medication cart was observed on 8-9-23 at 8:10am with Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1, who was working on the 200 Hall medication cart. The observation revealed the following insulins were open with no date. Aspart 10 cubic centimeter (CC) multi vial insulin bottle. Novolog Flex pen Lantus Flex Pen Glargine Flex Pen CMA #1 was interviewed on 8-9-23 at 8:13am. The CMA explained she had never looked at the insulin because she was not allowed to provide insulin to the residents. She further explained it was the responsibility of the nurse to provide the insulin. The CMA said she did not know who was responsible for checking the medication cart to ensure insulin was dated. 1b. Hall 300 medication cart was observed on 8-9-23 at 8:20am with Nurse #3 who was working on the 300 Hall medication cart. The observation revealed the following insulin had been opened but not dated. Glargine 5cc…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and resident, staff and physician interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the 9/2/20 focused infection control and complaint investigation survey, the 5/19/22 recertification and complaint investigation survey, the 10/19/22 complaint investigation survey, and the 3/8/23 complaint investigation survey. This was for one deficiency in the area of F880 Infection Prevention and Control that was cited on the 9/2/20 focused infection control and complaint investigation survey, 2 deficiencies in the areas of F550 Resident Rights and F677 Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care that were cited on the 5/19/22 recertification and complaint investigation survey, 1 deficiency in the area of F745 Medically Related Social Services that was cited on the 10/19/22 complaint investigation survey and 1 deficiency in the area of F550 Resident Rights that was cited on the 3/8/23 complaint investigation survey. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to have a staff member stay out of work following testing positive for COVID-19 per the facility's return to work criteria, and the facility failed to don personal protective equipment (PPE) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for isolation precautions (Resident #31 and Resident #48). Findings included: 1. Review of the facility's return to work criteria for COVID-19 positive staff, last revised 5/16/23, revealed a staff member could return to work after at least 7 days have passed since symptoms first appeared if a negative viral test is obtained within 48 hours prior to returning to work (or 10 days if testing is not performed or if a positive test at day 5-7), and at least 24 hours have passed since last fever without the use of fever-reducing medications, and symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath) have improved. Review of a COVID-19 test for the Transport Driver revealed he tested positive 7/24/23. He had no further COVID-19 tests…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to avoid the use of the term 'feeder' to refer to a resident who needed assistance with meals for 1 of 1 dining observation (Resident #22). The reasonable person concept was applied as individuals have the expectation of being treated with dignity and would not want to be labeled 'feeders'. Findings included: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #22's minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with eating. Review of Resident #22's care plan dated 6/19/23 revealed he was care planned for and activities of daily living self-care performance and mobility deficit related to dementia with behaviors. The interventions included for staff to provide assistance with meals. During observation on 8/7/23 at 12:32 PM Nurse Aide #4 saw Nurse Aide #2 enter Resident #22's room with his lunch tray. Nurse Aide #4 went to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide showers, bed baths, or nail care for 2 of 5 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #33 & Resident #16). Findings included: 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #33 had severe cognitive impairment. He was also coded as total dependence for bathing. He was coded for no rejection of care. Resident #33's care plan last revised on 6/14/23 revealed interventions which included to anticipate and meet needs, use a soft toothbrush, use electric razor, and ensure the resident has an unobstructed path to the bathroom. Review of the facility shower book revealed Resident #33 was scheduled for showers on Tuesday and Friday on the 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift. An interview on 8/08/23 at 1:25 PM with NA #2 revealed she provided Resident #33's ADL care often as she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, staff, and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident (Resident #58) medications after returning from the hospital. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. Findings included: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis that included diabetes. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was cognitively intact. Resident #58's July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed. The following medications that were to be given between 8:00pm and 9:00pm on 7-26-23 were documented as not provided due to Resident #58 being hospitalized . Crestor (cholesterol medication) 20 (milligrams) mg at bedtime. Gabapentin (pain medication) 100mg 2 capsules at bedtime. Mirapex (treats muscle spasms) 0.25mg 2 tablets at bedtime. Vitamin E 400 units at bedtime. Review of the emergency room documentation for Resident #58 revealed the resident arrived in the emergency room at 2:07pm and was discharged at 5:57pm.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, staff, and Physician interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician order for a pressure ulcer dressing change for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #39). Findings included: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included stage 4 pressure ulcer to the sacrum, hemiplegia, and diabetes. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was moderately cognitively impaired and was documented as having one stage 4 pressure ulcer. Resident #39's care plan dated 6-23-23 revealed Resident #39 had a potential and actual pressure ulcer related to hemiplegia and diabetes. The goal for Resident #39 was that her pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection. The interventions associated with the goal were administer treatments as ordered, assist with reposition and/or turn frequently, and observe skin integrity. A Physician order dated 6-28-23 revealed to cleanse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to schedule a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 2 days of 19 days (6-11-23 and 7-8-23) reviewed for staffing. Findings included: Review of the facility's daily posting from 5-4-23 through 7-30-23 revealed there was no RN coverage for 6-11-23 and 7-8-23. During an interview with the facility's scheduler on 8-8-23 at 1:03pm, the scheduler stated if there was not a RN scheduled, she would reach out to in-house staff first and then contact the agency to try and find coverage. She said she was aware there was supposed to be a RN in the facility at least eight hours a day. The scheduler explained somedays there just isn't any RNs to cover. The scheduler confirmed through timesheets 6-11-23 and 7-8-23 did not have RN coverage. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 8-8-23 at 2:13pm. The DON discussed meeting with the scheduler two to three times a week to review the schedule. She stated she was aware there needed to be a RN in the facility at least eight hours a day and said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to schedule an appointment for a mammogram as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #19) reviewed for medically related social services. Findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was a [AGE] year old female who had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #19's physician's orders revealed an order dated 5/09/23 which read to obtain a mammogram to bilateral breasts. Review of the physician's progress note dated 5/09/23 revealed the mammogram was ordered at the resident's request. Review of Resident #19's electronic medical record revealed no evidence of a mammogram appointment. An interview on 8/08/23 at 3:02 PM with the Social Worker (SW) revealed she was responsible for scheduling appointments in May 2023. She stated she sent the request to the hospital to get an appointment scheduled in the radiology department as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, staff, and Physician interview the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error by failing to administer a prescribed antibiotic for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #39 and Resident #58) reviewed for medication errors. Findings included: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included diabetes, stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was moderately cognitively impaired. A wound care note dated 8-2-23 by the wound care Physician revealed documentation that Resident #39's sacral wound had deteriorated and the Physician suspected a wound infection. Documentation also revealed the Physician wanted a wound culture to be completed and Bactrim DS (antibiotic) twice a day for 14 days started while the results of the culture were pending. Review of Resident #39's Physician orders from 8-2-23 through 8-6-23 revealed no order for Bactrim DS.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to offer the Pneumococcal 15-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV 15) or Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV 20) in accordance with nationally recognized standards for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #31). Findings included: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was over [AGE] years of age. Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination last reviewed 4/27/23 read in part that if an individual 65 years or older, [p]reviously received only PPSV23: 1 dose PCV15 OR 1 dose PCV20 at least 1 year after the PPSV23 dose. If PCV15 is used, it need not be followed by another dose of PPSV23. Review of Resident #31's immunization records revealed he received the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) on 3/19/18 outside of the facility by his primary care provider. There was no documentation that Resident #31 had been offered the PCV 20. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-13 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to receive mail delivered on Saturdays. This had the potential to affect 67 of 67 residents in the facility. The findings included: During a Resident Council meeting on 1/6/26 at 1:00 PM, members reported that mail was not delivered on Saturdays. Residents present included #71, #14, #19, #56, and #62. They stated that the Activities Director delivered mail Monday through Friday and only on Saturdays if she was in the facility. An interview was conducted on 1/6/26 at 1:16 PM with the Activities Director and she stated that on weekends, the manager on duty retrieved mail from the outdoor mailbox and placed it in the Business Office Manager's office. However, mail was not delivered to residents' rooms on Saturdays. The mail was given to her on Monday for delivery to residents. An interview was conducted with the Business Office Manager on 1/6/26 at 1:25 PM and she confirmed that weekend managers retrieved mail but did not distribute it because they were unsure which mail belonged to residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, Wound Care Physician interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately document treatments on a resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. (Resident #1) Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her active diagnoses included stage 4 pressure wound of the left heel. Review of Resident #1's wound care physician note dated 6/28/24 revealed the wound care physician documented Resident #1's treatment to her left heel was to be changed to sodium hypochlorite solution (dakins) apply once daily for 30 days: half strength; gauze roll (kerlix) apply once daily. Review of Resident #1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed from 7/1/24 through 7/12/24 there was no treatment documentation for Resident #1's left heel. During an interview on 8/5/24 at 11:29 AM Treatment Nurse #1 stated on 6/28/24 they had placed ½ dakins wet to dry on the wound per the wound care physician in the room at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-10 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to post accurate nurse staffing information for 19 of 92 days reviewed for daily posted staffing. Findings included: Review of the daily posted staffing from May 2023 through July 2023 revealed the daily posted staffing sheets were missing the daily Registered Nurse (RN) information for the following days: May 2023: 5-4-23 and 5-14-23. June 2023: 6-1-23, 6-11-23, 6-16-23, 6-19-23, 6-22-23, 6-24-23, 6-25-23, 6-26-23, and 6-29-23. July 2023: 7-8-23, 7-9-23, 7-19-23, 7-22-23, 7-23-23, 7-28-23, 7-29-23, and 7-30-23. The facility's scheduler was interviewed on 8-8-23 at 1:03pm. The scheduler explained she was responsible for the daily posted staffing. She also explained when she was not present, the hall nurses were to change the daily posted staffing to reflect the correct working schedule. After reviewing the daily posted staffing from May 2023 through July 2023, the scheduler stated she did not know why there was not a RN documented on some of the daily posted staffing. She discussed being new to the position and stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$249,991 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $70,220 — penalty dated 2025-05-06
- $179,771 — penalty dated 2024-10-15
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-27 for 17 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 78 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 78; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC EAST HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2023 |
| ALTER, TZVI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 80% | since 01/01/2023 |
| MURRAY, CHRIS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2023 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $287K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345339. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.