Winter Park Care And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 83.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 0.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.00 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility neglected to provide appropriate care and services to prevent a fall with major injury for a vulnerable and physically impaired resident, during a transfer with a mechanical lift and failed to complete a thorough investigation after a fall with major injury for 1 of 6 residents sampled for falls, (#197). On 2/08/24 at approximately 6:00 PM, the facility failed to prevent a fall with major injury during a transfer with a mechanical lift. The facility failed to utilize the appropriate type of mechanical lift and failed to follow policy requiring two staff for mechanical lift transfers. While Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G transferred resident #197 by herself from chair to bed using the wrong mechanical lift, the resident became unstable and was manually lowered to the floor. The resident complained of pain and x-rays done at the facility identified a fractured left clavicle, (A clavicle fracture-collarbone, is diagnosed through physical examination and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall with major injury for a vulnerable, physically, impaired resident, and failed to ensure the correct procedure was followed when using a mechanical lift to transfer residents for 1 of 6 residents sampled for falls, out of a total sample of 45 residents, (#197). On 2/08/24 at approximately 6:00 PM, the facility failed to prevent a fall with major injury during a transfer with a mechanical lift. The facility failed to utilize the appropriate type of mechanical lift and failed to follow policy requiring two staff for mechanical lift transfers. While Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G transferred resident #197 by herself from chair to bed using the wrong mechanical lift, the resident became unstable and was manually lowered to the floor. The resident complained of pain and x-rays done at the facility identified a fractured left clavicle, (A clavicle fracture-collarbone, is diagnosed through physical examination and x-rays. Symptoms of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) / Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee conducted performance improvement activities to ensure prior improvement measures were sustained. Findings: Review of the facility's QAPI Plan revealed the facility must take actions aimed at performance improvement and measure its success and track performance to ensure that improvements were realized and sustained. The facility would develop and implement policies addressing how the facility would monitor the effectiveness of its performance improvement activities to ensure that improvements were sustained. The facility had deficiency cited at F641 during the previous recertification survey conducted 2/12/24 to 2/17/24 for accuracy of assessments. During this survey, the facility was found to again be in noncompliance with F641 for accuracy of assessments regarding Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. As a result of the repeat deficiency, it was identified there was insufficient auditing and oversight to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate wheelchair was provided to accommodate the needs and preference of 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights, of a total sample of 30 residents, (#82). Findings:Resident #82 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 2/24/25 with diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture, history of falls, muscle wasting with atrophy, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident #82 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15/15 which indicated she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. She had no upper or lower limitations in range of motion and utilized a wheelchair for mobility.On 7/07/25 at 11:45 AM, resident #82 was observed in her room sitting up in a transport wheelchair watching television. She stated she was a private person and preferred to do activities in her room but sometimes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for nutritional approaches for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition, of a total sample of 30 residents, (#84).Findings:Resident #84 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] for strengthening following a hospital stay and a new lymphoma diagnosis. Resident #84 was discharged home with family and hospice services on 6/02/25. On 6/12/25 the resident was readmitted to the facility with generalized weakness and edema. The resident's diagnoses included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (cancer), muscle wasting and atrophy, urinary tract infection, and stage 2 chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission MDS assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 6/19/25 revealed resident #84's nutritional approaches included parenteral or intravenous (IV) feeding while a resident and a mechanically altered diet which required a change in texture of food or liquids on admission. Under the section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the intravenous (IV) catheter dressing was changed every seven days per physician order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for IV therapy, of a total sample of 30 residents, (#142).Findings:Resident #142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of neck, intraspinal abscess and spinal stenosis-cervical region. Review of resident #142's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE]. The assessment indicated he had a BIMs score of 15/15 which meant he was cognitively intact.A care plan initiated 7/07/25 indicated resident #142 received IV therapy related to antibiotic therapy administration. Interventions included, Observe dressing. Change dressing and record observations of site.Review of resident #142's EMR revealed physician orders were added on 7/07/25 for the care of the IV insertion site. The orders included directions to observe the site…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for administration had an accurate medical record, of a total sample of 3 residents, (#1). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #1, an [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility for respite care from home on 5/23/24, 6/07/24, 7/08/24, 8/23/24, and 9/16/24. The resident discharged home on [DATE], and most recently re-admitted on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included: cerebral arteriosclerosis, encounter for palliative care, holiday relief care, Alzheimer's Disease, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, gastrostomy (feeding tube), type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and insomnia. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set admission assessment with assessment reference date 10/01/24 noted resident #1 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status and assessed by staff with severely impaired cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-17 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident was assessed to be clinically appropriate to self-administer medication of a total sample of 45 residents, (#18). Findings: Resident #18, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included mechanical complication of internal fixation device of left femur, asthma, atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder. The resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 1/10/24, revealed the resident's cognition was intact, with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. On 2/12/24 at 11:48 AM, resident #18 was lying in bed, awake, alert, and oriented. Observation showed a handheld inhaler of Albuterol on the resident's tray table. She stated she administered it herself approximately every eight hours. On 2/12/24 at 4:45 PM, resident #18 was sitting up in her bed, working on a cross word puzzle. The Albuterol inhaler…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for all residents who ate their meals in the main dining room, by serving the resident's meals on serving trays at the table in an institutional manner. Findings: On 2/13/24 at 12:30 PM, during meal observation in the main dining room,13 residents were observed seated at the tables in the dining room. Each resident was noted to have a serving tray on the table in front of them which contained the lunch meal. The plates, cups, bowls and eating ware remained on the tray and were not removed from the trays at the table. On 2/13/24 at 4:46 PM, during meal observation, 12 residents were observed seated in the main dining room. Each resident had a serving tray in front of them with their meal, dinnerware and eating utensils on the tray. On 2/13/24 at 4:50 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) P was in the dining room. She acknowledged she was the only staff person in the dining room and had served meals to all 12 residents. CNA P stated the meals were always served on trays in the dining room. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an on-going individualized program of activities for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of a total sample of 45 residents, (#2, #79). Findings: Record review revealed resident #2, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included diabetes type II, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), heart disease, psychosis, dementia, blindness of her right and left eye, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with assessment reference date of 2/24/23 revealed resident #2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 7 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Section F- Preferences for customary routine and activities revealed code 1 was documented, indicating it was very important to the resident for the following activities: listen to music she liked, be around animals such as pets, do things with groups of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee implemented effective Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) to correct and monitor identified deficiencies, and ensure sustained improvements. Findings: In a joint interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/17/24 at 3:51 PM, the NHA stated the facility's QAPI committee implemented PIPs to address regulatory noncompliance identified during surveys, and as needed. The DON provided a document dated 6/09/23 that she identified as a PIP for falls. She explained the Regional Director of Operations had re-implemented the plan on 2/16/24. She noted they intended to identify opportunities for improvement related to fall occurrences that included investigations and identification of the root causes and stated, so we can put a true intervention in place. The NHA said regulatory compliance was discussed when any entity visited the facility whether it was a State Agency, Department, or the Ombudsman. He stated there was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' dignity was maintained, by failing to knock on doors prior to entry during dining observation on 1 of 2 wings, (East Wing). Findings: On 2/12/24 at 12:08 PM, during dining observation on the East Wing, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D was observed serving meal trays. CNA D entered rooms 101, 104, 105, 106, and room [ROOM NUMBER], and did not knock on the doors, or announced herself prior to entry. On 2/12/24 at 12:15 PM, CNA D donned appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), for Transmission Based Precaution (TBP) to deliver meal trays to residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The CNA did not knock on the door prior to entry and used her foot to push the door open. On 2/12/24 at 12:33 PM, CNA D acknowledged she did not knock on the residents' doors prior to entering rooms to serve meal trays. The CNA stated that normally she did not knock on the doors, but just went in and dropped off the trays. On 2/17/24 at 9:08 AM, resident #83…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$73,968 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $73,968 — penalty dated 2024-02-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL