Englewood Health And Rehab
425 Lauricella Court, Englewood, OH 45322 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (937) 836-5143 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.2% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 54.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.3% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.2% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.3%CMS range 32.7–58.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.1–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.3–15.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 94.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were notified of changes in medications. This affected one (#100) out of the three residents reviewed for notification of medication changes. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 06/05/24 with medical diagnoses of acute kidney failure, diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, and anxiety. Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/09/24, which indicated Resident #100 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #100 received an antipsychotic medication, but no other psychotropic medications noted. Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed a physician order dated 02/14/25 for sertraline 25 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth daily for anxiety. The medical record indicated the sertraline was discontinued on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address a resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and incontinence care needs. This affected one (#37) out of the three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 07/26/24 with medical diagnoses of sepsis, convulsions, hypertension, cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/28/25, which indicated Resident #37 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing, transfers, and bed mobility. The MDS indicated Resident #37 had a indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed there was no documentation to support the facility had developed a comprehensive person-centered care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a dependent resident. This affected one (#37) out of the three residents reviewed for timely incontinence care. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 07/26/24 with medical diagnoses of sepsis, convulsions, hypertension, cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/28/25, which indicated Resident #37 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing, transfers, and bed mobility. The MDS indicated Resident #37 had a indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed there was no documentation to support the facility had developed a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure wound care was completed as ordered and failed to send a resident to the emergency department as ordered. This affected one (#97) out of three residents reviewed for wound care and services and changes in condition. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 with medical diagnoses of influenza, chronic kidney disease stage III, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease. The medical record indicated Resident #97 was discharged on 03/19/25 to the hospital. Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission Data Collection assessment, dated 03/11/25, which indicated Resident #97 was cognitively intact and required limited staff assistance with bed mobility and extensive staff assistance with transfers and toileting. Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed a weekly non-pressure documentation assessment, dated 03/13/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered. This affected one (#100) out of the three reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 06/05/24 with medical diagnoses of acute kidney failure, diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, and anxiety. Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/09/24, which indicated Resident #100 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #100 received an antipsychotic medication, but no other psychotropic medications noted. Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed a physician order dated 02/14/25 for sertraline 25 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth daily for anxiety. The medical record indicated the sertraline was discontinued on 02/21/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#11 and #12) of three reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 02/15/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type two, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and breast cancer. The resident was admitted to hospice on 01/18/25. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating impaired cognition. She required set up for meals and toileting and supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for Gabapentin (Diabetic Neuropathy) 100 milligram (mg) capsule three times a day with a start date of 12/04/24. Review of the December 2024 Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in the containers from which they had been received. This had the potential to affect eleven (#11, #12, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24 and #25) residents with medications stored in the medication cart. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Observation on 01/24/25 at 10:06 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #24 revealed while preparing to administer medications, RN #24 opened the top drawer of the medication cart. There was an unmarked medication cup amongst the over-the-counter medications which contained 16 white, oblong tablets. Interview at the time of the observation with RN #24 verified the medication had been present at the start of her shift and she did not know what the medication was. She proceeded to dispose of the medication. The facility confirmed there were eleven (#11, #12, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24 and #25) residents with medications stored in the medication cart. Review of the facility policy, Medication and Storage date 2001…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff observed a resident consume oral medications. The facility also failed to ensure medications were stored properly. This affected two (#84 and #24) of two residents observed for medication administration. The census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/11/23. Diagnoses listed included congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety disorder, and restless leg syndrome. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 had moderate cognitive impairment. Observation of Resident #84's medication administration on 10/09/24 at 8:11 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #110 pulled ten oral medications for administration. The medications were aspirin 81 milligrams (mg), Buspar 10 mg, Coreg 12.5 mg, digoxin 0.25 mg, Fenofibrate 160 mg, isosorbide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely provide care and treatment for a resident with an ankle injury. This affected one (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for radiology services. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 06/05/24. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the physician progress note dated 08/22/24 revealed the resident complained of left ankle pain and stated she fell the day prior. The resident stated she got herself up, however it was not known if the resident reported the fall to the facility staff. The resident presented with left ankle swelling and pain with range of motion. Recommendations were made to obtain an x-ray to rule out a fracture or dislocation. Through the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an ice machine was maintained in a sanitary manner and food items were stored in a manner to prevent potential foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 81 out of 83 residents residing in the facility who receive their food/meals from the kitchen, the facility identified two residents (#68 and #71) that receive no food by mouth. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Observation of the facility's kitchen on 04/22/24 at 8:15 A.M. revealed there were two expired loafs of wheat bread on the bread rack that were dated 04/17/24 and one expired loaf of bread on the bread rack dated 04/21/24. Further observation of the facility's kitchen revealed there was white colored build up in interior the crevasses and on the ledge of the ice machine that were in contact with the ice. Interview on 04/22/24 at 8:15 A.M. with Dietary Manager #61 verified there were two expired loafs of wheat bread on the bread rack that were dated 04/17/24, one expired loaf of bread on the bread rack dated 04/21/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate written authorization were obtained to manage a resident's personal funds. This affected one (#246) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #246 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified heart failure and was discharged on 01/12/24. Review of document titled Authorization and Agreement to Handle Resident Funds revealed Resident #246 had a non-transferring resident Fund account. The form was unsigned and undated. Review of the Resident statement revealed Resident #246's account was opened on 12/14/23 with a cash deposit of $245.00. The account was paid out and closed on 01/22/24. During an interview conducted on 04/25/24 at 9:09 A.M. Business Office Manager #49 stated someone had given the resident cash and turned it over to the business office to open the account. BOM #49 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed/coded accurately. This affected two (#59 and #57) out of 22 residents sampled during the survey for MDS assessments. The facility census was 83. Findings include 1. Medical record review for Resident #59 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include acute kidney failure, chronic heart failure, respiratory failure, hypertension, obesity, sleep apnea, spinal stenosis, pressure ulcer sacral region, gastroesophageal disease, peptic ulcer, irritable bowel syndrome, anxiety, polyneuropathy, restless leg syndrome diabetes mellitus, insomnia, low back pain, depression. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 impaired cognition. Resident # 59 independent with eating. Resident #59 required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, policy review and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care included dental care. This affected one (#7) of four residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 83. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, altered mental status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, heart failure, gastroesophageal disease, and type 2 diabetes. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #7 revealed cognitive impairment. Resident #7 required set up assistance for oral hygiene. Resident #7 had no broken of loosely fitting dentures or mouth pain or difficulty chewing. Review of the plan of care for Resident #7 was silent for dental services. Review of dental services for Resident #7 dated 08/10/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care for dependent residents. This affected one (#57) of two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. The census was 83. Findings include: Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, and chronic hepatitis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had severely impaired cognition, impaired range of motion on the right side, and a required a two-person mechanical lift for transfers. Resident #57 was dependent for bowel and bladder incontinence, bathing, personal hygiene, and dressing, and moderate assistance for eating and oral hygiene. Review of the Care Plan dated for review on 05/03/24 for Resident #57 revealed facility staff are to monitor ADL's for assistance and render care as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and Physician interviews and policy review, the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, and implement wound care interventions for a newly identified non-pressure skin condition. This affected one (#24) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 83. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's chart revealed Resident #24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, abnormal posture, localized edema, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, anxiety disorder and calculus of kidney. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #24 required set up assistance with eating. Resident #24 required supervision with oral hygiene, and Resident #24 was dependent with toileting hygiene, showering, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, personal hygiene, chair transfers, toilet transfers, and tub…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and Physician interviews and policy review, the facility failed to timely assess, provide ongoing monitoring and timely implement treatments for a resident's pressure ulcers. Additionally, the facility failed to implement a wound physicians recommendations for a specialty mattress to promote healing of a resident's pressure ulcers. This affected one (#24) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 83. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's chart revealed Resident #24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, abnormal posture, localized edema, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, anxiety disorder and calculus of kidney. Review of Resident #24's pressure ulcer care plan dated 06/13/23 revealed Resident #24 had a history of pressure ulcer related to the sacrum, left posterior upper thigh, right posterior upper thigh, left distal buttock, and right distal buttock related to impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a wrist/hand splint was applied as recommended per therapy. This affected two (#57 and #59) of two residents reviewed for position and mobility. The census was 83. Findings include: 1. Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, and chronic hepatitis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had severely impaired cognition, impaired range of motion on the right side, and a required a two-person mechanical lift for transfers. Resident #57 was dependent for bowel and bladder incontinence, bathing, personal hygiene, and dressing, and moderate assistance for eating and oral hygiene. It was revealed Occupational Therapy (OT) started 03/08/24 and no documentation of a brace or splint being utilized. Review of the OT Evaluation for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews and policy review, the facility failed to document a physician's orders for catheter care in a resident's medical record. This affected one (#71) out of one resident reviewed for urinary catheter care. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #71 revealed an admission [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to ileus, diabetes type two, cerebral infarction, paralytic syndrome, stroke, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hemiplegia affecting right side, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and methicillin resistant staphylococcus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #71 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #71 was coded as having an indwelling urinary catheter during the look back period. Review of the plan of care for Resident #71 dated 01/25/23 revealed resident has an indwelling catheter due to neuromuscular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor resident weight loss and implement weight loss interventions. This affected two (#28 and #84) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28's chart revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, insomnia, chronic kidney disease stage three, other low back pain, anxiety disorder, depression, opioid dependence, weakness, other irritable bowel syndrome, mixed hyperlipidemia, foot drop, morbid obesity due to excess calories and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be moderately cognitively impaired and Resident #28 required supervision with toileting, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, sitting to standing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medications as physician ordered. This affected one (#45) of one resident reviewed for medications. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of medical record reveals Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system (right above knee amputation with wound vac in place on stump), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 is cognitively intact and has an enteral feeding tube (PEG) through the abdomen for nutrition. Resident #45 requires supervision for oral hygiene, maximal assistance for dressing, bed mobility, toileting, and transfers, and dependent for bathing. Review of physician orders for April 2024 revealed Resident #45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and review of medication information, the facility failed to psychotropic medication were given with adequate indications for use and a resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication order had a stop date. This affected three (#28, #42 and #55) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28's chart revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, insomnia, chronic kidney disease stage three, other low back pain, anxiety disorder, depression, opioid dependence, weakness, other irritable bowel syndrome, mixed hyperlipidemia, foot drop, morbid obesity due to excess calories and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be moderately cognitively impaired and Resident #28 required supervision with toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored. This affected two (#24 and #63) out of 83 residents in the facility. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's chart revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, abnormal posture, localized edema, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, anxiety disorder and calculus of kidney. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #24 required set up assistance with eating. Resident #24 required supervision with oral hygiene, and Resident #24 was dependent with toileting hygiene, showering, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, personal hygiene, chair transfers, toilet transfers, and tub transfers. Resident #24 required maximal assistance with upper body dressing, sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and hospice staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice in the development of a comprehensive plan of care. This affected one (#55) of one reviewed for hospice services. The facility census is 83. Findings include Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include but not limited to dementia, apraxia, attention and concentration deficit, adult failure to thrive, altered mental status, depression, dehydration, pseudobulbar, malnutrition. Review of the significant modification of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #59 revealed resident was admitted into the hospice program. Review of the recertification of hospice plan of care revealed the resident admitted to hospice on 6/19/23. Review of the most recent quarterly assessment dated [DATE] for resident #55 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident had no behaviors. No impairments. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were handled in a sanitary manner during medication administration pass. This affected two (#70 and #63) out of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 9/16/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to type two diabetes, hypertensive urgency, heart disease and anemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #70 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #19 required maximal assistance for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. Resident #19 is independent for eating. Review of the active physicians orders for Resident #70 revealed orders for Levothyroxine Sodium oral tablet 50 micrograms (mcg)- give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for hypothyroidism dated 02/14/2023, Imodium A-D oral tablet 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with eating in a dignified manner. This affected two (Residents #77 and #78) out of eight residents observed in public dining areas. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 12/06/21. Diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified Alzheimer's disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/20/23, revealed Resident #77 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #77 required one-staff total assistance with eating. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 01/25/19. Diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. Review of the most recent MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 07/08/23, revealed Resident #78 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #78 was a one-person physical assist and required supervision assistance with eating. Observation on 09/07/23 at 8:11 A.M. revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. There were three medication errors out of 34 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 8.82%. This affected three (Residents #24, #77, and #78) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 09/04/21. Diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified cerebral infarction, unspecified vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type two diabetes. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 had a physician order dated 01/12/23 for Vitamin B12 2000 units by mouth once daily. Observation and interview on 09/07/23 from 9:43 A.M. to 10:01 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #39 did not have enough Vitamin B12 500 microgram (mcg) tablets available to administer 2000 mcg as ordered and was unable to locate an additional supply of the medication after searching the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #51) out of one resident who received Nitroglycerin from the Magnolia medication cart. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 09/07/23 at 9:56 A.M. revealed the Magnolia medication cart had a souffle cup labeled Nitroglycerin which contained three white oblong tablets in the top drawer. Interview on 09/07/23 at 9:57 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #39 verified the Nitroglycerin tablets (vasodilator medication) were stored improperly. LPN #39 stated Nitroglycerin tablets should be stored in a dark bottle which protected the medication from light. Review of the policy titled Medication Storage, dated 09/29/22, revealed all drugs which required light protection while in storage will remain in the original package, in a closed drawer or cabinet, or in a specially wrapped manner until the time of administration, according to manufacturer's recommendations.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided assistive devices as ordered. This affected one (Resident #46) out of one resident identified as using assistive devices during meals. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 12/16/20. Resident #46's diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified seizures, unspecified dementia, and frontal lobe/executive function deficit following cerebral vascular accident. Review of Resident #46's care plan, dated 06/14/23, revealed Resident #46 was at risk for malnutrition and dehydration due to use of a mechanically altered diet, advanced age, and potential for decline related to dementia. Interventions included built up spoons, a divided plate, and a handled cup. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #46 had physician orders, dated 08/31/23, for a regular diet, dysphagia/mechanical soft texture, regular liquids, and fortified foods with a divided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure wounds were assessed regularly and dressing changes were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #38) out of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's clinical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses which included but was not limited to cellulitis, acquired absence of the right leg below the knee, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, bacteremia, type two diabetes with diabetic chronic kidney disease, acquired absence of the left toe, and unstageable pressure ulcer of the sacral region. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/31/23, revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating he had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the physician note, dated 12/30/23, revealed Resident #38 was seen by the Medical Director.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a hand splint and palm protector were applied as ordered. This affected one (Resident #53) out of two residents reviewed for position and mobility. The census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/16/22. Resident #53's diagnoses included muscle weakness, convulsions, hemiplegia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #53's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/19/23, revealed Resident #53 was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, and had an upper extremity impairment of the left side. Review of Resident #53's physician orders revealed an order, dated 05/12/23, for a left palm protector at all times except during personal hygiene. Monitor Resident #53's skin for any signs and symptoms of breakdown. Notify MD (physician) of changes. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to properly check a gastrostomy tube placement. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for enteral feeding. The census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed Resident #57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, oropharyngeal dysphagia, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #57's care plan, dated 01/25/2023, revealed Resident #57 was dependent on tube feeding for intake due to diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident and dysphagia. Interventions included check tube feed placement every feeding, hold feedings if residual was above 100 ml, and provide enteral feedings as ordered. Observation on 06/13/2023 at 1:50 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #238 used a piston syringe to check the residual stomach contents for Resident #57's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured properly when left unattended. This had the potential to affect two (Residents #7 and #14) of 18 residents who resided on the [NAME] unit and were identified as cognitively impaired and ambulatory. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Observation on 06/13/2023 from 1:50 P.M. to 1:57 P.M. revealed the medication cart on the [NAME] unit was left unlocked and unsupervised while Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #238 and the Director of Nursing (DON) were administering medications to Resident #57. During an interview on 06/13/2023 at 1:57 P.M., the DON verified the medication cart on the [NAME] unit had been unlocked and was unsupervised while LPN #238 administered medications. Review of the policy titled Medication Storage, dated 09/29/2022, revealed during a medication pass, medications were under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication cart.
- Potential for harm · F2020-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure all staff were checked against the Nurse Aide Registry prior to employment to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered into the State Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel records revealed no evidence of employees being checked against the State Nurse Aide Registry prior to employment for the following employees: the Administrator hired on 02/21/19, Activities Assistant #36 hired on 05/29/19, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 hired on 12/31/19, LPN #21 hired on 04/18/19, LPN #23 hired on 06/27/19 , LPN #37 hired on 06/14/19, LPN #47 hired on 11/20/19, LPN #76 hired on 07/15/19, LPN #82 hired on 06/04/19, LPN #87 hired on 08/01/19, LPN #89 hired on 05/31/19, LPN #93 hired on 12/19/19, LPN #100 hired on 12/10/19, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse #75 hired on 10/14/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2020-01-16 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Aides (STNAs) received 12 hours of training a year. This affected three (#14, #17 and #83) of six STNA's reviewed for education. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of personnel records for STNA #14 who was hired on 07/24/14 revealed no evidence of 12-hours in-service training. 2. Review of personnel records for STNA #17 who was hired on 05/17/12 revealed no evidence of 12-hours in-service training. 3. Review of personnel records for STNA #83 who was hired on 08/23/18 revealed no evidence of 12-hours in-service training. Interview with Payroll Specialist #70 on 01/14/20 at 12:15 P.M. verified the above STNA's did not have the 12-hour inservice training. She stated she had been auditing the personnel files since she was a new employee herself and had some of the training for the employees but not all of it. Review of facility policy entitled Competencies dated 03/01/17 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the medical record and the nurse's report sheet matched a resident's wishes regarding Advanced Directives. This affected one Resident (#77) of two reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including diabetes and pneumonia. Review of code status form in the medical record dated 02/03/07 revealed Resident #77 was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR/no cardio-pulmonary resuscitative measures to be instituted in the event of cardiac arrest and /or respiratory arrest). The form was signed by the resident's responsible party and a representative from the facility. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #82 confirmed Resident #77's code status was listed as a Full Code on the Report Sheet. She revealed she would refer to a resident's status on the report sheet to determine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a safe and orderly discharge. This affected one Resident (#338) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #338 revealed an admission date of 05/13/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD), and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/20/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #338's physician order dated 06/13/19 revealed an order for the resident to discharge to home with home health care, nursing, and physical/occupational/speech therapy as needed, and seven days of medication. Review of provider note dated 06/13/19 revealed Resident #338's vital signs were obtained and they were within normal limits. There was no documentation as to how the resident was transported, if any education was given, if any medications were given, or any information regarding any follow up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to assure the accuracy of the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) upon admission. This affected two (#13, and #21) of four residents reviewed for PASARR screens. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #21 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, insomnia, and schizophrenia. Review of the PASARR completed 03/28/18 in the hospital prior to admission to the facility noted the resident had a diagnosis of dementia but did not reflect the additional mental disorders listed on the cumulative diagnoses list. The PASARR was not updated on admission to accurately reflect the residents diagnoses of serious mental disorders and the resident was not been screened by the State-designated authority to receive Level II services. In addition, on 05/09/18 the diagnosis of major depressive disease had been added and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview the facility failed to ensure care conferences were conducted on a quarterly basis and in addition the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect peripheral edema and use of ace wraps. This affected three (#26, #70, and #83) of three residents reviewed for care conferences and care plan revisions. The census was 93. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 06/08/13 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, anemia, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, hypokalemia, dysphagia, urinary incontinence, retention of urine, altered mental status, anxiety disorder, chronic allergic conjunctivitis, secondary hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disorder, cellulitis, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of an annual comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident with moderately impaired cognitive skills. Review of a physician order dated 11/08/18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview and review of the facility position summary for certified nursing assistants, the facility failed to ensure qualified staff provided treatments. This affected one (Resident #70) of 22 residents reviewed for care and services during the investigative phase of the survey. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 06/08/13 with diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, anemia, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, hypokalemia, dysphagia, urinary incontinence, retention of urine, altered mental status, anxiety disorder, chronic allergic conjunctivitis, secondary hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disorder, cellulitis, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of an annual comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognitive skills. Review of a physician progress note dated 11/08/19 revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview and review of the facility position summary for certified nursing assistants, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was implemented correctly and failed to ensure the appropriate staff provided treatments. This affected one (Resident #70) of 22 residents reviewed for care and services during the investigative phase of the survey. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 06/08/13 with diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, anemia, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, hypokalemia, dysphagia, urinary incontinence, retention of urine, altered mental status, anxiety disorder, chronic allergic conjunctivitis, secondary hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disorder, cellulitis, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of an annual comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognitive skills.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly care for a resident's urinary catheter. This affected one (Resident #36) of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTIs). The census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/19. Diagnoses included urinary retention, stage three kidney disease, neoplasm of prostate, neuropathic bladder, obstructive uropathy, and UTI. Review of Resident #36's careplan for alteration in elimination of bladder indwelling urinary catheter dated as revised 11/13/19 revealed urinary drainage bag should be kept off the floor and tubing should be checked for proper positioning. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was currently being treated for a UTI, and had been treated for a UTI since admission to the facility. During an observation on 01/13/20 at 11:00 A.M. Resident #36 was ambulating in the hallway in his wheelchair. Resident #36's urinary catheter tubing was dragging on the floor beneath his wheelchair.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide enteral nutritional supplements per the physician orders. This affected one (Resident #21) of two residents reviewed for nutritional status. The total facility census was 93. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 04/26/18 with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, age-related debility, gastro-esophageal reflux disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, hyperglycemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, schizophrenia, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of weight records revealed the resident weighed 132.1 pounds on 12/07/19 and 124.4 on 01/02/20, which was a significant weight loss of 5.83 percent (%) in 30 days. Review of physicians order dated 12/31/19 indicated tube feed TwoCal HN (a nutritionally complete, high calorie formula) as needed if the resident consumes less than 50% of meal by mouth. Review of current physician orders of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on closed medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of medication information insert and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly store medications. This affected one of two medication rooms and one former Resident's (#239) whose medications were being stored in a plastic bag in an office. The census was 93. Findings include: 1. Observation of the Oak and [NAME] medication room refrigerator on 01/16/20 art 1:28 P.M. revealed an opened bottle of influenza vaccine (Afluria) dated as opened 08/28/19. Review of an informational insert included in the Afluria medication box revealed after the stopper of the vial was pierced the vial should be discarded. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #15 confirmed during an interview on 01/16/20 at 1:30 P.M. that the opened Afluria bottle was outdated and should be discarded. 2. Review of Resident #239's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/19. Diagnoses included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type II diabetes mellitus, aphasia, and cholecystitis. Resident #239 was discharged on 12/29/19.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medications and treatments provided. This affected two (#64 and #70) of 22 residents reviewed during the investigative phase of the annual survey. The census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/06/19. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus type one, and right below the knee amputation. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Review of physician orders dated 11/28/19 revealed to give Veltassa (potassium binding medication) on non-dialysis days, every day and night shift. Further review revealed an order dated 06/01/19 for dialysis chair time at 5:30 P.M. on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of medication administration records (MAR) for December 2019 revealed Veltassa was documented as being administered in the morning and night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the hospice contract, the facility failed to ensure the hospice plan of care and visit notes were available in the facility. This affected one (Resident #18) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility identified four residents who received hospice services. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 08/08/17. Review of physician orders dated 05/15/19 revealed the resident was admitted to Hospice care with Hospice entity #103 with a terminal diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. On 01/16/20 at 8:50 A.M., interview with Staff Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #82 and Unit Manager LPN #3 was conducted. They provided a notebook in which Hospice entity #103 left a check off list of when Hospice nurse aides and hospice licensed nurses were in the facility to visit and care for Resident #18. Both indicated the Hospice nurses enter their progress notes into the Hospice laptop. Both LPN's indicated the Hospice nurses did not leave progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records, observation, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during medication administration. This affected one (Resident #8) of six residents observed during medication administration. The census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/30/14. Diagnoses included encephalitis, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and muscle weakness. Medications being administered to Resident #8 was observed on 01/16/20 at 8:50 A.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #88. LPN #88 was observed leaving another residents room and pushing the medication cart to outside Resident #8's room. LPN #88 began removing medications from the medication cart for Resident #8. LPN #88 did not wash or sanitize his hands. LPN #88 popped medications from bubble pack medication cards into his bare hands and then placed them into a medication cup. LPN #88 removed four medications. These medications were sertraline 50 milligrams (mg), sertraline 25 mg, omeprazole 10 mg,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 78 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 78; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLYER 4 OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/29/2022 |
| ACM ASHEM HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/29/2022 |
| FLYER 4 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/29/2022 |
| FTK FLYER OH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/29/2022 |
| ZANZIPER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/29/2022 |
| BIRNBAUM, EZRA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| HIRSCH, SHAYE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| SINGER, SIMON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| ENGLEWOOD PROPERTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| KRIESER, AKIVA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| MOERMAN, RAFAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| RUSSELL, LAURA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| ZANZIPER, NATALIE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2025 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| MED-NET COMPLIANCE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2018 |
| NPNH1 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| OVATION REHABILITATION SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| SHS KEREN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| THE PAVILION MANAGMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
| DIXON, KOBY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/02/2025 |
| ZANZIPER, NAFTALI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365088. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.