Bradford Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 160 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Observation, interview, and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for residents related to peeling paint on the walls in room [ROOM NUMBER], holes in the wall in rooms [ROOM NUMBER], and stained ceiling tiles in rooms 100, 107, 109, and 119. This affected four (4) out of 20 sampled residents, R11, R12, R19, and R20.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Resident Rights Policy, reviewed 04/2026, revealed residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.Request for the facility's maintenance policy revealed that they didn't have any policies pertaining to maintenance of their building.Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 05/26/2026 at 4:00 PM revealed three (3) stained ceiling tiles in the left corner of the room and above the window. The fabric window covering was also stained. The tiles were yellowish-brown from apparent moisture.Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 05/26/2026 at 4:03 PM revealed staining on two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Observation, interview, and review of facility policies revealed the facility failed to provide assistance with incontinence care in a timely manner for four (4) of 10 sampled residents (R1, R6, R7, and R14).The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights Policy, reviewed 04/2026, revealed residents had the right to receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of the resident's needs and preferences.Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living Policy, revised 04/2026, revealed residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living would receive the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene.Review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care Policy, reviewed 04/2026, revealed it was the practice of the facility to provide perineal care to all incontinent residents as needed in order to promote cleanliness and comfort, as well as to prevent infection and skin breakdown.Observation of the 300 hall on 05/27/2026 at 9:38 AM revealed Resident (R)6's call light engaged. His room smelled of feces…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure pain assessments were completed prior to and after the administration of as needed (PRN) narcotic pain medications for four (4) out of four (4) sampled residents, Resident (R)4, R8, R16, and R18.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Pain Management Policy, revised 04/2026, revealed the facility would utilize a systematic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of pain. It further revealed, the facility would use a pain assessment tool, appropriate for the resident's cognitive status, to assist staff in consistent assessment of a resident's pain. The policy stated, Facility staff will reassess resident's pain management at established intervals for effectiveness and / or adverse consequences.Review of the facility's policy, titled, PRN Medication Policy, reviewed 04/2026, revealed documentation would be provided in the resident's medical record to show adequate indications for a medication's use. Further, the policy advised that, when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications with expired or post discard dates were not available for resident use for one of four sampled residents (Resident (R) 1). Observation on 04/08/2026 revealed an intravenous (IV) antibiotic (Meropenem) container hanging on an IV pole in R1's room labeled with directions to discard the medication after 03/03/2026.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage last revision date of 02/01/2026, revealed A. Expiration dates (beyond-use date) of dispensed medications shall be determined by the pharmacist at the time of dispensing. B. Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will be labeled with the manufacturer's expiration date. The policy failed to include directions for staff on how to appropriately address medications past their discard date. Review of R1's Resident Face Sheet found in facility's electronic medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 03/23/2026 with diagnoses of acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all staff properly adhered to infection control and personal protective equipment (PPE) regulations in accordance with professional standards for one of four sampled residents (Resident (R) 1) for enhanced barrier isolation. Observation on 04/08/2026 revealed a staff member entered a R1's room, who was on enhanced barrier precautions and performed direct resident care without donning the appropriate PPE. The findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, last revision date 01/20/2026, revealed the facility had established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Further review of the policy revealed 16. Staff Education: A. All staff shall receive training, relevant to their specific roles and responsibilities, regarding the facility's infection prevention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, which had the potential to affect 93 of the facility's 93 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage, revised 10/2019, revealed the Dining Service Director/Cook(s) were to ensure all food items were stored properly in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Observation on 09/09/2025 at 10:15 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed her hairnet receded approximately three inches above the hairline exposing uncovered hair on both sides of her head above her ears and in the front above her forehead. Continued observation of the kitchen, of refrigerator, 1 revealed a container of strawberries covered with mold. Observation revealed two heads of lettuce stored in a plastic bag that was opened, uncovered, and undated. Observation of freezer 1 revealed a box…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents sampled for wound care out of the total sample of 20, (Resident (R)2 and R6). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised on 02/02/2025, revealed it was the facility's policy for hand hygiene to be performed in accordance with the facility's established hand hygiene procedures. Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care-Dressing Change, reviewed 03/24/2025, revealed it was the facility's policy to clean the bedside table with facility approved cleaning wipes and use a clean barrier to establish a clean field on resident's overbed table for placement of (wound care) supplies. Continued review of the policy revealed staff providing wound care were to remove their gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, which had the potential to affect 90 of the facility's 94 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Observation during the initial kitchen tour revealed numerous food items in the reach-in cooler not labeled or dated. In addition, continued observation of the kitchen revealed [NAME] 2 failed to have a beard covering in place. Further observation revealed [NAME] 2 failed to utilize utensils when serving food, using his gloved hands and not changing gloves. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, undated, revealed, Culinary service employees shall prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Per policy review, food preparation staff were to adhere to proper hygiene and sanitary practices to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Continued review revealed bare hand contact with food was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to choose activities, schedules, health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of care and the resident had a right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #6 (R6)). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Self Determination and Participation, dated 02/22/2024, revealed the facility was to promote and facilitate a resident's right to self-determination through support of the resident's choice. Further review revealed a resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life that were significant to the resident. Review of R6's Face Sheet for revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/06/2016, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, and morbid obesity (severe), due to excess…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure its grievance policy was followed to ensure prompt resolution of all residents' grievances and completion of such grievances for 2 of 30 sampled residents (Residents (R6 and R73)). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, revised 03/14/2024, revealed the facility was to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The policy stated the (facility's) grievance official was responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to the conclusion. Continued review revealed the staff member receiving a grievance was to record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form and forward the form to the grievance official as soon as practicable. Per policy review, the written decision was to include, at a minimum: the date the grievance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY