Cascadia of Boise

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, I&A review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for residents to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #21) whose records were reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #21. Findings include: The facility's Accidents and Supervision to Prevent Accidents policy, revised on 10/15/22, stated facilities were obligated to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Adequate supervision was determined by assessing the appropriate level of care and number of staff required, the competency of the staff, and the frequency of supervision needed. This determination was based on the individual resident's assessed needs and identified hazards in the resident's environment. The State Operation Manual, Appendix PP, defined Avoidable Accident as an accident occurred because the facility failed to: Identify environmental hazards and/or assess individual resident risk of an accident, including the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interviews, representative interviews, staff interviews, observations, review of grievances, and review of the three-week nursing schedule, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was available to meet resident needs according to their plan of care. This failure had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility if staff were not available to ensure resident needs and safety measures were provided. Findings include: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) website accessed on 5/13/26, article titled The National Imperative to Improve Nursing Home Quality (2022) documents, inadequate staffing contributes to delayed care, missed care tasks, and reduced resident safety. Staffing must be aligned with resident acuity, not just minimum numbers.A review of facility Grievance Forms, dated 10/3/25 through 5/4/26, showed multiple concerns reported by residents and their representatives related to call light response times, delayed care, untimely medication administration, staff attitude, and unmet care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of an accident. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for notifications. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident #20 and/or their representative from making timely and informed decisions regarding the resident's medical care. Findings include: The Facility's Fall Response & Management policy, revised 8/21/25, documented facility will notify the provider and resident representative if a resident sustains a fall.Resident #20 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's, dementia, anxiety, kidney disease, and diabetes.The fall report dated 12/16/25, documented Resident #20 was found face down on the floor next to her bed. Upon examination, Resident #20 had a significant bump to the back of the right side of her head and small red mark under her right eye. The I&A report dated 12/16/25, identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow the physician's order to monitor urinary output. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) whose bowel and bladder records were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident #4's hydration status when physician ordered monitoring was not completed. Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (the partial or total paralysis of all four limbs, both arms and both legs, and the torso), epilepsy, and retention of urine.A physician's order initiated 4/24/25 and revised on 1/20/26, documented to measure and record output for Resident #4's indwelling urinary catheter every shift for hydration management.A review of Resident #4's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the months of October 2025 through April 2026 showed the physician ordered monitoring of urinary output was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, the Food Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure ice machines were cleaned, and resident freezers were not contaminated by non-food items, or undated, opened food. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 70 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. The FDA Food Code Section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, TCS (time/temperature control for safety) food, date marking, states marking the date or day the original container is opened in a food establishment, with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded.On 9/26/25 at 12:08 PM, it was observed in the Alpine Resident freezer, undated lemon ices, a frozen yogurt, and a frozen entree meal were not labeled with the resident's name or dated. A therapy ice pack was wrapped in a pillowcase and stored on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) Assessments were accurate. This was true for 3 of 6 residents (#5, #16, and #59) whose MDS assessment records were reviewed for accuracy. This deficient practice created the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to assessment inaccuracies'. Findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and depression. Resident #5's PASRR Level I, dated 6/26/23, documented, in Section I at #1, diagnoses of depressive disorders and anxiety disorders, and at #3, panic disorder. Resident #5's PASRR Level II, dated 7/20/26, documented, in Section IX at #33, Individual has a current diagnosis of sever mental illness per PASRR criteria: Depression, Anxiety, Panic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were revised according to their post fall needs. This was true for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #33) whose records were reviewed for care plan timing and revision. This deficient practice created the potential for harm when residents' needs were not identified and or met. Findings include:Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including a broken right leg, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia.On 9/22/25 at 5:28 PM, Resident #33's representative stated her mom had fallen out of bed a few times as she is a restless sleeper and was on a new mattress. Resident #33's representative stated fall precautions had been put into place. There was a floor pad placed, and Resident #33's bed was in the lowest position while she was in bed.An Incident & Accident (I&A) fall report, dated 8/21/25, documented an unwitnessed fall with Resident #33. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and Insulin Lispro website, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were administered according to professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #36) whose insulin administration was observed. This failed practice created the potential for Resident #36 experience low or high blood sugar if she receives an incorrect amount of insulin. Findings include:Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes.A physician's order, dated 9/2/25 documented Resident #36 was to receive Insulin Lispro 100 unit/ml, inject two units subcutaneously (under the skin) before meals for diabetes management.On 9/24/25 at 11:58 AM, RN #3 took the Insulin Lispro pen, removed the needle, sanitized the tip of the insulin pen, placed a new needle and dialed the pen to two units. RN #1 stated she did not prime the needle because it was an old pen, if it was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practiced were followed. This was true for 3 of 22 residents (#6, #7, and #58) reviewed for following physician's orders. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if the facility failed to follow physician's orders and if resident's experienced complications related to catheter placement and care, and hypoglycemia (a condition in which blood glucose (BG, sugar) falls below normal.) Findings include: 1.Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including diabetes. A physician's order, dated 8/22/25, directed staff to check blood glucose for hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) and/or hyperglycemic (high blood sugar) symptoms. If blood sugar (BG) is less than 70 initiate hypoglycemic protocol and notify MD as indicated. If BG is greater than 400 notify MD and follow directives. A physician's order, dated 8/20/2025, documented staff provide: Gvoke HypoPen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication orders were clarified. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #87) whose records were reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed Resident #87 at risk for over medication when her rescue seizure medication orders did not clearly direct their use. Findings include: Resident #87 was admitted the facility on 4/5/23 with multiple diagnoses including spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (characterized by stiff muscles and movement difficulties in all four limbs, the trunk, and the face due to early-life brain damage), a seizure disorder, and congenital hydrocephalus (a condition present at birth where excess cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) builds up in the brain, increasing pressure and potentially causing brain injury and developmental problems). Resident #87's medical record contained the following physician orders:Nayzilam Nasal Solution 5 MG/ 0.1 ML, Midazolam (benzodiazepine anticonvulsant), give 1 spray in 1 nostril as needed for seizure that lasts for more than 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's records contained accurate documentation related to their vital signs. This was true for 1of 22 residents (Resident #7) whose record was reviewed for accurate documentation. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse outcomes and harm if Resident #7's blood pressure was taken in an unsafe manner. Findings include:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including high blood pressure, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and dependence on renal dialysis.A physician's order, dated 8/20/25 and 8/26/25, documented, Check fistula sight to the Left arm for signs and symptoms of infection and if bruit or thrill present, enter = if present and - if not present. Enter NA if not applicable. Every shift for dialysis monitoring. A physician's order, dated 8/20/25, documented, Do NOT take blood pressure on Left arm.A review of blood pressure (BP) measurements documented BP was taken on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,049 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,049 — penalty dated 2023-09-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $816K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID