No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Colville Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia

1000 East Elep Street, Colville, WA 99114 · For profit - Corporation · 92 certified beds · (509) 684-2573 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$68,351 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $68,351 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-07)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
982 E Columbia Ave · (509) 684-2561 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
810 North Highway · (509) 684-2973 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
462 N Maple St · (509) 684-5818 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(509) 684-5094 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.7%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms21.7%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.4%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.1%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.4%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.1%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.861.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.351.521.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.9%CMS range 40.6–59.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.4–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.2–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
67.0%
Total nursing turnover
85.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 58.2 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

30
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-23)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2025-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, report, protect, assess and prevent a pattern of resident-to-resident verbal and physical abuse. This included identifying a known pattern of aggressive behaviors by Residents 19. Abusive behaviors identified by staff included hitting, punching, kicking, ramming into other residents with a wheelchair (w/c), verbal abuse, threats and intimidation of other residents. The facility failed to recognize these instances as abuse, analyze the circumstances of these abusive behaviors, or implement plans for prevention or recurrence of abuse for 11 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 19, 31, 49, 21, 43, 27, 37, 33, 45, 3, and 41), reviewed for abuse. Failure to recognize, analyze, and act upon multiple incidents of resident-to-resident altercations as abuse and provide adequate supervision and care planning with effective interventions placed all 61 residents at risk of serious injury or harm and represented an immediate jeopardy (IJ). 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide effective monitoring and supervision, implement interventions, develop adequate and effective interventions to prevent repeated falls with adverse and injurious sequelae related to those falls for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 19, 50, and 60), reviewed for falls. Resident 19 experienced harm when they had repeated falls as evidenced by a dislocated hip on 09/12/2024, a right femur (leg bone) fracture on 01/14/2025, and a back fracture on 03/03/2025. Resident 50 experienced harm when they fell a total of 36 times between 04/04/2024 to 05/17/2025 and sustained a range of injuries, to include hospital transfers for their treatment. Resident 60 experienced harm when they fell and sustained a fracture to their eye socket and left lower leg and had a delay in discharge to the community. These failures placed the residents at risk for further repeat serious injuries such as fractures, disability, or death and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2025-05-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently ensure the facility had enough staff to provide adequate supervision and safe care according to the facility acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and/or care plans for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 19, 50, and 60), reviewed for falls. Resident 19 experienced harm from repeated falls as evidenced by a dislocated hip on 09/12/2024, a right femur (leg bone) fracture on 01/14/2025, and a back fracture on 03/03/2025. Resident 60 experienced harm when they fell three times and sustained a fracture to their eye socket and left lower leg. Resident 50 experienced harm when they fell a total of 36 times from 04/04/2024 to 05/17/2025 and experienced a range of injuries, to include hospital transfers for their treatment. Additionally, the facility failed to identify, report, protect, assess and d provide staff supervision to prevent a pattern of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-05-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 34 and 61) reviewed for medication administration. Resident 34 received an injection of Lantus insulin (a type of insulin used to treat high blood sugar that provided a consistent level of insulin over a 24-hour period and mimicked the body's natural insulin production) that was 7.2 times their prescribed dose that was ordered for a different resident (Resident 42). Resident 34 experienced harm when they had an extended period of symptomatic hypoglycemia (extremely low blood sugar) that required administration of rescue medications on five different occasions to normalize their blood sugar level and symptoms. Additionally, Resident 61 did not receive their ordered doses of a blood thinner and an injectable medication that managed weight and blood sugar which placed the resident at risk for unintended health consequences. Findings included . The ISMP,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents, was free from injury. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were transferred in a sit to stand (designed to assist patients who have some mobility but need help to rise from a sitting position) by staff, the resident's arm sling got caught and wrapped around their neck causing them to become unresponsive; staff left the resident unattended in the lift to get help, the resident fell out of the lift, and was found on the floor. This failure placed the residents at risk for falls and serious injury Findings included . Review of a facility assessment, dated 04/01/2024, showed Resident 1 had diagnoses to include heart disease and Diabetes. The resident was able to make their needs known, required maximum assistance with bed mobility and was dependent with transfers. The resident used a sit to stand lift to be transferred. Review of the facility investigation, dated 06/10/2024, showed Resident 1 requested to use the bathroom. Staff A, Nursing Assistant, put the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents, was free from injury. Resident 1 was transferred by a Hoyer lift (a power lift using a sling) independently by Staff B, Nursing Assistant. The Hoyer sling was improperly placed which caused Resident 1 to slide down during the transfer and their arms were pulled upward. Resident 1 experienced harm when they had pain and was sent to the hospital for evaluation where it was determined they sustained a fracture of their left arm. This constituted a Past Non-Compliance (the facility was not in compliance at the time the situation occurred; however, there was sufficient evidence that the facility corrected the non-compliance after it was identified) at harm. The facility immediately educated and completed traning by 12/04/2023 Staff B and all staff on the proper use of Hoyer lifts, emphasizing safe Hoyer lifts require two employees, along with skill and competency check offs. The facility was notified of the past non-compliance on 01/10/2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to routinely provide pharmaceutical service that ensured accurate dispensing and administration of medications for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk for potential medication errors, misappropriation of opioid medications (also referred to as narcotic, powerful pain medication used to treat severe pain) and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised September 2025, showed all staff authorized to administer medications must follow the 10 rights of medication administration to ensure resident safety, reduce medication errors, and maintain compliance with federal and state regulations. The policy listed the 10 rights of medication as 1) Right Medication- verify the medication against the provider's order and the Medication Administration Record (MAR), 2) Right Resident- use identifiers such as photo along with verbal confirmation, 3) Right Dose- confirm the dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential abuse was reported as required to the State Survey Agency within two hours after the allegation was made, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Failure to report an allegation of potential abuse placed Resident 1, and other residents in the facility, at risk for additional abuse. Findings included .The 02/27/2026 annual assessment showed Resident 1 had diagnoses to include kidney disease. The assessment showed Resident 1 had memory impairments and difficulty making their needs known and required substantial to maximum assistance with bed mobility. The facility policy titled Abuse - Reporting and Response dated 08/25/2025, documented allegations involving abuse, neglect .will be promptly reported, investigated, and addressed in accordance with applicable Federal and State regulations. Alleged or suspected incidents involving resident abuse, neglect . must be promptly reported to the Administrator and/or Director of Nursing. Facility staff are required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, as required. This failure placed all residents at risk of lack of RN oversight for care provided, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A review of the 30-day Staffing Pattern from 04/12/2025 through 05/12/2025 showed there was no RN on duty a minimum of eight hours a day, as required, for the following dates: 04/12/2025, 04/19/2025, 04/26/2025, 05/08/2025, and 05/10/2025. In an interview on 05/22/2025 at 11:35 AM, Staff M, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), acknowledged they had worked without an RN on duty. Staff M explained most LPNs can handle most of the same things as an RN but the facility contacted the Director of Nursing as needed, when there was no RN on duty. In an interview on 05/22/2025 at 3:00 PM, Staff D, Resident Care Manager, acknowledged there had been days without an RN on duty but they were on-call in case of emergencies. In an interview on 05/22/2025 at 3:12 PM, Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to effectively use its resources to maintain facility compliance with Federal regulatory requirements to ensure potential situations of abuse were identified and proper measures were taken for 11 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 19, 31, 49, 21, 43, 27 37, 33, 45, and 3) reviewed for abuse, provide adequate nursing staff to supervise residents and complete care timely for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 19, 50, and 60) reviewed for falls, provide behavioral and/or mental health services for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 34 and 40) reviewed for mood and behavior, administer medications as prescribed for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 34 and 61) reviewed for medication administration, and implement appropriate infection control measures for 3 of 3 nursing units reviewed for infection control. In addition, the Administration failed to effectively utilize their Quality Assurance and Improvement Program (QAPI) to address and follow up timely on identified concerns. These failures created…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that identified deficiencies, implemented good faith efforts for corrective actions, and evaluated implemented corrective actions or performance improvement activities for effectiveness. The facility's QAPI program failed to timely recognize already compromised care and services that resulted in a potential for a pattern of resident harm. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) revised April 2024 showed, the facility monitored quality deficiencies related to facility operations and practices causing negative outcomes through the QAPI process. The QAPI committee served as a preventative function by reviewing and improving facility systems and took actions toward enhancing quality of care and quality of life for facility residents. The QAPI framework was established through five elements: 1) design and scope, 2) governance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Program (QAA) that identified deficiencies and implemented appropriate preventative or corrective actions. The facility's QAA program failed to timely recognize already compromised care and services that resulted in a potential for a pattern of resident harm. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) revised April 2024 showed, the facility monitored quality deficiencies related to facility operations and practices causing negative outcomes through the QAPI process. The QAPI committee served as a preventative function by reviewing and improving facility systems and took actions toward enhancing quality of care and quality of life for facility residents. The QAPI framework was established through five elements: 1) design and scope, 2) governance and leadership, 3) feedback, data systems and monitoring, 4) Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs), and 5) systematic analysis and systemic action. The committee was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that met at least quarterly and included the Infection Preventionist who was a required member of the QAA committee. This failure minimized the effectiveness of the interdisciplinary QAA team ' s ability to identify processes and outcomes related to infection control practices and disease management. Additionally, this failure resulted in 27 of 61 residents and 33 staff members contracted Norovirus (highly contagious, gastrointestinal (GI), infectious illness that caused nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea). Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) revised April 2024 showed, the facility monitored quality deficiencies related to facility operations and practices causing negative outcomes through the QAPI process. The QAPI committee served as a preventative function by reviewing and improving facility systems and took actions toward enhancing quality of care and quality of life for facility residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program that identified, reported, and controlled the spread of communicable diseases for residents and staff during a Norovirus [a highly contagious gastro-intestinal (GI, affected the stomach and intestines) virus that caused nausea, vomiting and diarrhea] outbreak and to implement basic infection prevention interventions that included enhanced barrier precautions, transmission-based precautions, prompt reporting of a laboratory confirmed Norovirus outbreak to the State Survey Agency and local health departments, and exclusion of staff members from work according to the recommended standards. These failures facilitated a Norovirus the outbreak which spread to all 3 of 3 nursing units and 27 of 61 residents (Residents 50, 11, 40, 38, 43, 51, 19, 59, 46, 63, 28, 21, 41, 37, 23, 47, 67, 48, 34, 6, 32, 33, 3, 22, 20, 35, and 5) and 33 of 86 staff members (CC, JJ, Y, SS, J, AA, TT, UU, VV, A, F, WW, LL, GG, K, EE, G, D, N, FF, XX, U, YY, ZZ, AAA, II, RR, BBB, E, CCC, DDD,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a resident call light system that was functionable and audible, as required. This failure placed all facility residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . During observation on 05/12/2025 at 12:16 PM, a call light was visibly lit up above a resident room but not audible in the hallway. Similar observations were made at 12:36 PM, on 05/13/2025 at 8:23 AM, 8:38 AM, 10:13 AM, and 12:47 PM, and on 05/19/2025 at 4:09 AM. During an observation on 05/12/2025 at 12:46 PM, the call light indicator board at the nurses' station showed one or more resident room call lights were lit up as activated but not audible in the hallway. Similar observations were made at 3:30 PM, on 05/13/2025 at 8:40 AM, 10:14 AM, 10:41 AM, 11:41 AM, 1:27 PM, on 05/14/2025 at 8:37 AM, on 05/15/2025 at 8:42 AM and 2:22 PM, on 05/16/2025 at 8:35 AM, on 05/19/2025 at 4:30 AM and 4:49 AM. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were provided the mandatory effective communication training for 10 of 10 sampled staff (Staff P, L, AA, R, BB, K, CC, DD, EE, and FF) reviewed for communication training. This failure placed all residents at risk of unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the following employee files found no documentation that showed effective communication training had been provided as required: - Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff L, Registered Nurse - Staff AA, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff R, Nursing Assistant, registered - Staff BB, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff K, Nursing Assistant - Staff CC, Nursing Assistant - Staff DD, Nursing Assistant - Staff EE, Nursing Assistant - Staff FF, Nursing Assistant In an interview on 05/22/2025 at 4:12 PM, Staff C, Clinical Resource Nurse, stated the previous Administrator did a lunch and learn meeting with the staff for effective communication training, but there was no signature sheet, and they were unable to find any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and/or their representatives about their right to have their bed held while hospitalized for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 51 and 19), reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure precluded the residents and/or their representatives to participate in decisions regarding their right to return to the same facility upon hospital return, and the right to know how much the facility would charge for holding their bed. Findings included . Review of a revised April 2025 facility policy titled Bed-Hold Readmission showed, the facility issued two notices related to bed-hold policies. The first notice was given well in advance of any transfers such as information in the admission packet, and the second notice provided to the resident and/or the resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital, or in cases of emergency transfer, within 24 hours of transfer. <Resident 51> Review of a 05/04/2025 admission assessment showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to repeatedly implement the facility abuse prevention policy to include identification of potential instances of abuse, reporting allegations to the State Survey Agency as required, thoroughly investigate allegations, review interventions for effectiveness, revise interventions as needed, and communicate, coordinate, review, and track allegations of abuse through the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for 1 of 11 sampled resident (Resident 19), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, psychosocial harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Preventing Abuse revised August 2023 showed, the facility would identify, correct, and intervene in situations in which abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of resident property was more likely to occur. Staff were to observe residents, visitors and staff to identify inappropriate behaviors and deploy sufficient staff on each shift to meet the needs of the residents. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate with the State designated authority to ensure residents with a mental disorder received integrated care based on their needs for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 34, 37, and 40) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a two part screening; Level I determined presence of a Severe Mental Illness, SMI, or Developmental Disability and if present required a Level II evaluation by a specialized evaluator to determine if nursing home placement was the appropriate level of care, and what behavioral health or other community services were recommended. A Level II was required to be completed prior to nursing home admission.) Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident 34's PASSR level II recommendations were implemented, Resident 40's Level II evaluation was completed timely, and Resident 37's Level I screening was not completed correctly prior to admission. These failures placed the residents at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure services provided consistently and routinely met professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 51 and 19), reviewed for hospitalizations. Specifically, the facility failed to repeatedly ensure resident hospital transfer documentation was completed as required to include the basis for hospital transfer, specific resident needs unable to be met by the facility, facility attempts to meet the needs, services available at the receiving facility to meet needs, and what information was conveyed to the receiving provider. This failure placed residents at risk of potential delays in emergent hospital treatment, unmet care needs, and potential complications. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Documentation of Resident Health Status Needs and Services revised October 2022 showed, staff were to document in a resident's medical record as soon as the encounter concluded to ensure accurate recall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff notified the provider for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 34, 40 and 61) reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, the staff failed to notify the provider when Resident 34 experienced extremely low blood sugars, Resident 40 experienced significantly low blood pressures (BP), and Resident 61 experienced elevated blood sugars. This failure precluded the provider's involvement in coordinating care and placed the residents at risk of further adverse or deteriorating clinical outcome. Findings included . The 11/28/2017 facility policy Resident Change of Condition documented that upon recognition of a potentially life-threatening condition or significant change in status, the nurse was to communicate with other health care providers. The physician was to be informed at the time of the event as soon as possible. Notification should occur immediately if any symptom, sign or apparent distress is sudden in onset, or a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to evaluate staff competencies in skills and techniques related to diabetes management, medication administration, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Substance Use Disorders (SUD), Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR), trauma informed care, fall management, or incident root cause analysis to ensure staff provided necessary care and responded to each resident's individualized needs for 8 of 10 sampled staff (Staff P, L, AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, and FF), reviewed for nursing services. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or underqualified care staff, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment reviewed May 2025 showed, the facility provided care to residents who were diabetic, received blood thinners, had histories of SUD, trauma/PTSD, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and other medical conditions related to mental health. The facility provided person-centered/directed care by building…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health services were provided for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 34 and 40), reviewed for mood and behavior. This failure created risk for residents to experience a decline in their psychosocial well-being. Findings included . <Resident 34> The [DATE] admission assessment documented Resident 34 had diagnoses that included end-stage kidney disease dependent on dialysis (a mechanical way of ridding a body of toxins when the kidneys no longer function), diabetes, and alcohol dependence. Resident 34 was cognitively intact, made their own decisions regarding their care, had no behaviors and did not reject their care. A Level II Behavioral Health Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR, a screening completed prior to skilled nursing facility admissions that determined a need for behavioral health services for residents) Notice of Determination dated [DATE] documented Resident 34 had a mental health diagnosis, met…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate medically related social services were provided to meet residents' needs at the time of transfer to the hospital or discharge to the community. Specifically, Social Services failed to ensure the basis for discharge was supported by documentation in the medical record for 1 of 4 sample residents (Resident 4), reviewed for discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk of placement in an unsuitable environment, increased risk of harm, and psychological distress. Additionally, Social Services failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes who protect and promote the resident rights under federal and state law and regulations) of 37 transfers to the hospital for 5 of 5 months (January, February, March, April and May 2025) reviewed. Failure to notify the Ombudsman of hospital transfers, precluded the Ombudsman from effectively advocating for the residents' rights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed the required hand hygiene (HH) during meal service for 1 of 2 dining rooms (DR) observed. This failure placed the residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included . An observation on 05/12/2025 at 12:23 PM showed Staff KK, Agency Nursing Assistant (NA), placed clothing protectors on nine residents. During the application of the clothing protectors, Staff KK touched the residents' hair, neck, or clothing. No HH was observed between residents. Staff KK proceeded to the take a bag of clothing protectors and placed it on a counter behind the DR's entry door closest to the kitchen. Staff KK then walked out then right back in from the other entry door (farthest from the kitchen), touched a male resident in a wheelchair (wc) and walked out of the DR without completing HH. Staff KK then returned to the DR, went over to a female resident, touched their wc and left arm, went over to attend to another resident's request for Kleenex, went to get the Kleenex on the counter and did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the governing body acted with disregard to the well-being of the residents of the facility; by not providing adequate oversight and monitoring of the appointed Corporate Officers/Administrator and/or the Director of Nursing. Failure to identify potential incidents of abuse, provide adequate nursing staff to supervise residents and complete care timely, provide mental health services, administer medications as prescribed, address and follow up timely on identified concerns, and implement appropriate infection control measures created multiple situations that caused harm to residents, and two separate situations of an immediate jeopardy (IJ: a situation that had occurred that could result in harm, serious injury and/or death). related to abuse and accident hazards. Findings included . Refer to F600 CFR 483.12, Freedom from Abuse and Neglect The governing body failed to identify, report and assess a pattern of abuse related to resident-to-resident altercations by Resident 19. In addition, the governing body failed to identify, assess or implement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain minimum documentation that staff were educated regarding risks and benefits of the COVID-19 (a viral illness that caused fever, difficulty breathing or possibly death) vaccine, were offered the vaccine, and the COVID-19 vaccine status of the staff as required for 1 of 1 staff reviewed. This failure placed staff and residents at risk of and exposure to illness from COVID-19. Findings included . The revised 08/01/2023 facility policy COVID-19 Vaccination for Residents and Staff documented staff were educated of the risks and benefits associated with the COVID-19 vaccine so they could make an informed decision regarding immunization. Education and re-education was documented in the employee file. Staff have the opportunity to accept or refuse a vaccine or booster and may change their decision at any time. During an interview on 05/22/25 at 4:09 PM, Staff F, Infection Preventionist, Licensed Practical Nurse, was asked if they were the one that kept track of staff COVID vaccinations. Staff F stated the facility did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the mandatory Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training was provided as required for 10 of 10 sampled staff (Staff P, L, AA, R, BB, K, CC, DD, EE, and FF) reviewed for training requirements. This failure placed all residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's 05/08/2025 QAPI plan showed the facility had a process in place to recognize, assess, and implement steps to improve the quality of life, care and services at the facility, however, the plan did not specify or include the type of training the staff would receive or how often training would occur. Review of the following employee files found no documentation that showed the facility provided the mandatory QAPI training: - Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff L, Registered Nurse - Staff AA, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff R, Nursing Assistant, Registered - Staff BB, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff K, Nursing Assistant - Staff CC, Nursing Assistant - Staff DD,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the mandatory Compliance and Ethics training was provided as required for 9 of 10 sampled staff (Staff P, L, AA, R, BB, K, CC, DD, EE, and FF) reviewed for training requirements. This failure placed all residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Review of the following employee files found no documentation that showed the mandatory Compliance and Ethics training had been provided: - Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff L, Registered Nurse - Staff AA, Licensed Practical Nurse - Staff R, Nursing Assistant, registered - Staff K, Nursing Assistant - Staff CC, Nursing Assistant - Staff DD, Nursing Assistant - Staff EE, Nursing Assistant - Staff FF, Nursing Assistant In an interview on 05/21/2025 at 1:49 PM, documentation was requested from Staff A, Administrator, that showed the facility had provided the mandatory Compliance and Ethics training. In an interview on 05/23/2025 at 9:36 AM, Staff A, stated they expected staff to receive adequate training in order to have adequate skills and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain financial information in a secure manner to prevent unauthorized access for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 49), reviewed for personal property. This failure placed residents at risk of misappropriation, financial exploitation and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 04/22/2025 quarterly assessment, Resident 49 had moderate cognitive impairment and was able to clearly verbalize their needs. Review of the 04/19/2024 care plan showed Resident 49 was impulsive and utilized the services of a payee (an appointed person to manage finances when an individual was unable to do so). The care plan showed Resident 49 was inclined to send money to their family, but it was not in Resident 49's best interest. Additional record review found a front and back color copy of a bank card with four numbers handwritten below the card, scanned into Resident 49's electronic clinical health record accessible to any nursing staff with access to the health record. In an interview on 05/22/2025 at 8:37 AM, Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike and safe environment and equipment that was in good repair for 2 of 2 halls and 2 residents (Resident 36 and 50). Failure to ensure floor tiles were replaced, the ends of metal wheelchair brake extenders were covered, and room walls and base board heater paint were intact, placed the residents at risk of injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 36> An observation of Resident 36's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on 05/13/2025 at 12:28 PM showed the wall behind the resident's bed was gouged and dented from the headboard. The baseboard between the resident's bed in the room was scuffed with the paint peeling off. <Resident 50> An observation of Resident 50's wheelchair on 05/12/2025 at 10:52 AM showed bilateral metal wheelchair brake extenders with no rubber protectors on the tip. Rubber protectors served to cover the metal end and prevent injury. <B Unit> An observation on 05/13/2025 at 12:28 PM of the floor near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered as needed injectable antipsychotics (medication that affected the brain, emotions, or behaviors) unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition documented in the clinical record for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 19), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of side-effects from the medications, unnecessary chemical restraints, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 04/10/2025 quarterly assessment, Resident 19 had severe cognitive impairment with inattention and disorganized thinking. The assessment further showed Resident 19 exhibited worsening verbal and physical behaviors directed towards others that significantly interfered with Resident 19's care, participation in activities or social events, placed others at significant risk for physical injury, significantly intruded on the privacy or activity of others and significantly disrupted care or the living environment. Review of October 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, assess, and address potential signs and/or symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 19), reviewed for mood and behavior. This failure placed residents at risk of re-traumatization, unmet behavioral health needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the website www.mayoclinic.org Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was a mental health condition that could develop after witnessing or being part of an extremely stressful or terrifying event. Symptoms could include flashbacks (feelings that the traumatic event was occurring again), nightmares (repeated disturbing dreams), intrusive thoughts, severe anxiety, avoidance (not wanting to think or talk about a traumatic event), changes in mood or thinking and physical and emotional reactions. These symptoms last more than one month, cause major problems in social or work situations and affect how well a person gets along with others. Review of the facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards and expired medications were removed from inventory. Specifically, insulin pens were not labeled with the date opened in one of two medication carts, and expired Bisacodyl suppositories (a medication to treat constipation) were found in one of two medication carts and the only medication room. This failed practice placed residents at risk of receiving expired medications, that may not have been fully effective. Findings included . According to Medscape.com, insulin pens must be discarded 28 days after opened. The facility policy titled Medication Management, revised 10/15/2022, documented medications were to be discarded by the expiration date or earlier. <Rehab Medication Cart> During an inspection of the Rehab medication cart on 05/21/2025 at 12:31 PM, the following was noted: 1) An opened Lantus (a long-acting insulin) pen for Resident 47, without a date of when the pen was opened. 2) An opened Novolog (a fast-acting insulin)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to adequately monitor a resident, who had expressed the desire to leave the facility. This placed the resident at risk for exiting the building without staff knowledge, and potential injury. Findings included . According to an assessment dated [DATE], Resident 1 had diagnoses which included Rt. femur fracture, dementia with behavioral disturbance, muscle weakness, and a history of falling. He required substantial assistance with activities of daily living and was able to self-propel in his wheelchair within the facility. According to an initial CSCD-Wandering/Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 11/25/2024, Resident 1 was assessed at a level 2 (high-risk), risk for elopement, and 15-minutes safety checks were recommended. On 12/16/2024, a quarterly CSCD-Wandering/Elopement Risk Evaluation was completed for Resident 1and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the police of an allegation of sexual abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for potential abuse and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: In review of the facility incident report #581 dated 10/21/2024 it documented Staff A, Hospitality aide informed Staff B, Director of nursing of an allegation of sexual abuse of Resident 1, allegedly perpetrated by Staff C, aide on 10/19/2024. It further documented the facility notified the state agency on 10/22/2024, and the resident representative on 10/23/2024, of the allegation. No documentation of local law enforcement notification was found in this document. In an interview on 11/27/2024 at 3:42pm, Staff D Administrator stated they did not notify the police of the allegation of abuse because they felt there was no immediate danger and they did not feel the allegation was legitimate. They stated they assumed Staff A had already notified the police. In an interview on 12/3/2024 at 2:46pm, Staff D stated they spoke with the local police department and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide showers for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4), reviewed for bathing. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of a facility assessment, dated 06/16/2024, showed Resident 1 had diagnoses which included a disorder of movement and muscle tone. The resident was able to make their needs known. Resident 1 was dependent on staff for showers. According to Resident 1's care plan, dated 01/21/2020, Resident 1 was an extensive assist for showers and preferred two showers per week. It was noted the resident would sometimes resist showers and for staff to encourage the resident to shower and notify the nurse if they continued to refuse. Review of shower records from 06/17/2024 to 07/17/2024 showed Resident 1 had refused showers on 06/26/2024, 07/03/2024 and 07/13/2024. The resident had a shower on 07/16/2024, one shower in a month. Review of nurse progress notes from 06/17/2024 to 07/17/204 showed no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 sample residents (10, 20), reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [an assessment completed prior to admission into a skilled nursing facility to determine whether a resident with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness needed specialized mental health services] was completed accurately and if indicated, a referral for additional screening had been made. This failure placed the residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet mental health care needs. Findings included . <Resident 10> Per the 03/31/2024 admission assessment, Resident 10 admitted to the facility from the hospital and had diagnoses which included depression and schizophrenia (a chronic, severe mental disorder that affected the way a person thought, acted, expressed emotions, and perceived reality). On 05/08/2024 at 10:45 AM, Resident 10 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan, to address a resident with wounds for 1 of 3 sample residents (33), whose care plans were reviewed. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Per the 04/03/2024 significant change in condition assessment, Resident 33 had diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), congestive heart failure (a condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), diabetes (a condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) and was at risk for skin breakdown. A review of Resident 33's skin evaluations documented the following: - 03/28/2024, the resident had an open area on their left buttock. - 04/09/2024, the resident had an open area to their right lower leg - 04/12/2024, the resident had a blister to their left leg. Review of Resident 33's care plan dated 12/12/2023, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance during mealtimes for 1 of 1 sampled resident (16), reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased food and fluid intake, and possible unintended weight loss. Findings included . The 03/02/2024 significant change assessment documented Resident 16 was severely cognitively impaired, delusional and had Alzheimer's dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life). In addition, the assessment also documented the resident required partial to moderate assistance from staff for eating. The 03/26/2024 nutritional care plan documented Resident 16 was at risk for nutritional problems related to Alzheimer's dementia. The care plan instructed staff that Resident 16 required supervision, set-up assistance, and cueing at mealtimes to facilitate food and fluid intake. On 05/08/2024 at 12:38 PM, Resident 16 was observed sitting in their wheelchair near the front entrance of the dining room facing the wall, perpendicular to and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sample residents (15) reviewed for activities, was engaged in meaningful activities that met their interests. Failure to engage the resident in meaningful activities placed the resident at risk for boredom and diminished quality of life. Findings included Review of the 02/10/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 15 had severe cognitive impairment, was unable to direct their care, and had diagnoses which included dementia and failure to thrive. The assessment showed the resident was dependent with care, including transport in their wheelchair. A staff assessment of activity preferences documented that Resident 15 enjoyed listening to music. Review of the 08/25/2022 care plan showed Resident 15 was dependent on staff for meeting all emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs. Activity interventions included people watching, sensory stimulation, and music. The following continuous observations were made: On 05/09/2024, from 9:44 AM to 12:12 PM, Resident 15 was awake, sitting up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective bowel management for 2 of 3 residents (26, 37), reviewed for constipation. These failures placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and resulted in an emergency room visit for Resident 26, for further medical treatment. Findings included . According to an undated Bowel Protocol policy, staff was to initiate the following if a resident did not have a bowel movement (BM) in 72 hours: 1) Give Milk of Magnesia (MOM) or Miralax (types of laxatives, given by mouth) on evening shift. 2) Administer a suppository (laxative medication inserted into the rectum) on night shift 3) Administer an enema (liquid laxative medication, instilled into the rectum) on day shift. <Resident 26> According to an admission assessment, dated 05/01/2024, Resident 26 had diagnoses which included diabetes and septicemia (a life-threatening infection.) The resident was able to make decisions regarding their care. In addition, Resident 26 was incontinent of bowel and required maximum staff assistance with positioning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assess a resident for smoking safety for 1 of 2 sampled resident (37), reviewed for accidents. Findings included: The 02/20/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 37 was able to make decisions regarding their care, had diagnoses which included stroke, which resulted in weakness and paralysis on their right side. In addition, the assessment documented the resident required set-up to substantial/maximal assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living. On 05/09/2024 at 1:02 PM, Resident 37 was observed smoking, using the left hand. While smoking, Resident 37 dropped a lit cigarette, and it rolled down by their foot. Resident 6 picked up the cigarette and handed it back to them. Resident 37 took a puff of the cigarette and dropped it again. The cigarette rolled down the front of their sweatshirt and onto their right sleeve and then bounced onto the left thigh area of their sweatpants. Resident 37 then picked up the cigarette and continued smoking. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide needed pain management for 1 of 3 sampled residents (6), reviewed for pain. This failure placed residents at risk of uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 03/29/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 6 was admitted with diagnoses which included osteoarthritis, migraines and chronic pain syndrome and was able to make their needs known. Additionally, the assessment documented the resident had pain frequently that would impact their sleep and day to day activities. In an interview on 05/08/2024 at 3:37 PM, Resident 6 stated they had been out of their Hydrocodone 5 milligram (mg) tablets (a narcotic used to treat pain) for about three days and was not offered anything else for pain relief. The resident stated they were told by nursing staff that there was nothing else they could do. A review of the Medication Administration Records for May 2024, documented physician orders for acetaminophen (Tylenol) every four hours as needed (PRN) for pain, Hydrocodone 10/325 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consistently collaborate care with the dialysis center, and accurately monitor the fluid restriction for 1 of 1 sampled resident (33) reviewed for dialysis care. These failures placed residents at risk of unrecognized complications, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long Term Care Facility Outpatient Dialysis Services Coordination Agreement, between the facility and the dialysis center dated 10/15/2022, documented there should be documentation of collaboration of care and communication between the long-term care facility and the dialysis center. According to the 04/03/2024 significant change in condition assessment, Resident 33 had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (kidneys stop working and are not able to remove waste or extra water from the blood) and was dependent on dialysis. Resident 33 was able to make their needs known. The 12/21/2023 dialysis care plan instructed nursing staff to send the Dialysis Communication form to the dialysis clinic for each visit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the pharmacist were addressed in a timely manner, for 1 of 5 sample residents (30), reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving an inaccurate dosing of medication, adverse side effects, and the risk of receiving a medication longer than medically necessary. Findings included . The Consultant Pharmacy Report, dated 01/2024, documented Resident 30 received Peridex mouth wash and it was recommended the resident should not brush their teeth, rinse mouth, eat or drink following the rinse to be added to the Medication Administration Record (MAR). The same recommendation was made for 02/2024 and again for 03/2024. A review of Resident 30's record showed no response from the provider or nursing regarding the recommendation until 03/04/2024 (two months after the recommendation was made). In an interview on 05/16/2024 at 10:38 AM, Staff C, Resident Care Manager, stated the pharmacy recommendations were received and if it pertained to nursing, the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 2 of 4 sampled residents (2, 9), observed during medication pass. Specifically, 2 errors were made during 27 medication administration opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 7.41 percent. Errors in medication administration placed residents at potential risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication. Findings included . According to Medscape.com, the warnings section for both Brimonidine Eye Drops and Refresh Eye Drops shows to wait five minutes between instilling eye drops, if more than one product is administered. <Resident 2> During an observation on 05/15/2024 at 7:22 AM, Staff R, Registered Nurse (RN) prepared medications for Resident 2. The resident had two different eye drop medications ordered, Brimonidine (medication to treat elevated pressure in the eye) one drop in the left eye, and Refresh eye drops (lubricant, for dry eyes), two drops to each eye. Staff R administered the Brimonidine eye drops, then immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during the meal service for 1 of 2 dining rooms. These failures placed the residents at risk for infections and unmet care needs. Findings included . During a lunch observation on 05/08/2024 at 12:22 PM in the assisted dining room, Staff W, Admissions Coordinator, prepared coffee for the residents, touched their straws with bare hands, touched the tablecloth and clothing protectors, adjusted a resident's glasses, and served another cup of coffee without performing hand hygiene in between. In an observation at 12:25 PM, Staff W gave a cleansing wipe to a resident to wash their hands, passed a tray, touched a resident's clothing protector, and without hand hygiene being performed, opened food items for a resident and passed another tray. During an observation on 05/08/2024 at 12:34 PM, Staff W was assisting four residents to eat at the same table. Staff W rubbed the arm of a resident to wake them up and gave them bites of food. Staff W touched the resident's wheel on their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information was correctly electronically submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for Quarter 3 of 2023, reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure caused the CMS to have inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels and had the potential to impact resident care and services. Findings included . Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report showed the facility reported data for Quarter 3, 2023 (July 1, 2023, through September 31, 2023), at a level lower than required by mandated staffing levels. During an interview on 03/20/2024 at 11:05 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the Human Resource (HR) Manager was responsible for submitting the PBJ information. The HR Manager confirmed the numbers submitted for Quarter 3, 2023 as those in the CASPER. Staff A stated the facility had not added Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2), reviewed for urinary catheters (a tube inserted in the bladder that allowed urine to drain). This failure placed the residents at risk for possible urinary tract infections (UTI's). Findings included . Review of the facility policy Indwelling Catheters, revised on 04/12/2022, showed urinary catheters and drainage bags were to be changed as necessary or unless specified by a physician's order. <Resident 1> According to the facility assessment, dated 01/30/2024, Resident 1 had diagnoses to include a stroke. Resident 1 was able to make their needs known and had a urinary catheter. Review of Resident 1's care plan, dated 01/24/2024, showed the resident was to have their catheter changed as ordered by the physician and/or changed as needed for infection or obstruction. The resident was to be monitored for signs and symptoms of a UTI. Review of provider progress notes showed Resident 1 was seen by a urologist (a provider that specializes in care of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that provided a safe and sanitary environment, and helped prevent the spread of communicable diseases such as COVID-19 (a highly infectious virus that causes respiratory illness, possible difficulty breathing, pneumonia, hospitalization, or death) for 6 of 13 residents (17, 22, 18, 25, 37, 42), assisted during a meal service. In addition, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed and gloves were changed between clean and dirty tasks for 2 of 2 sampled residents (35, 18), reviewed for incontinence care and toileting. This failure to correctly use personal protective equipment (PPE-masks and gloves), and to complete hand hygiene, placed residents at risk for infectious diseases, potential serious infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . PPE/Policy: According to the 11/03/2022 Washington State Department of Health Guidance Update, healthcare settings were required to follow the Washington State Secretary of Health Mask…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) services for 2 of 5 sampled residents (7, 32), reviewed for dependence on staff for care. Resident 7 was not supervised or cued during oral care and had large amounts of food debris stuck on their dentures, and Resident 32 was not provided grooming for long, thick nasal hairs. These failures placed the residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident 7 Resident 7's record and 01/16/2023 assessment showed diagnoses including stroke with difficult speaking and swallowing. The assessment also showed Resident 7 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision of one staff for their activities of daily living (ADLs) including personal hygiene. The 01/22/2020 comprehensive care plan showed the resident had oral/dental health problems, and was to be supervised and cued for oral care. On 02/02/2023, the Nursing Assistant (NA) tasks documentation for Resident 7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards by implementing a system for securing and storing hazardous potentially toxic chemicals in an area in 2 of 2 shower rooms (1 & 2), 1 of 2 soiled utility rooms (1), and the boiler room. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable injury. Findings included . The 11/28/2019 revised Resident's Environment Policy showed the facility would ensure materials that posed a hazard to residents would be identified and properly secured to prevent unauthorized access, including chemicals used by the facility staff in the course of their duties (housekeeping chemicals), chemicals or other materials brought into the facility by staff or visitors, and drugs/therapeutic agents. An observation on 01/29/2023 at 3:01 PM showed an unoccupied, unattended shower room (1) on the B-wing with the door unlocked, and without a locking mechanism on the door handle. A sign on the outside of the door said, Keep door closed and LOCKED at all times. Inside the shower room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food was stored and served in a sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The failure to ensure 1 of 1 nourishment unit refrigerators was free of expired, unlabeled, and undated food products, and failure to ensure staff performed adequate hand hygiene during resident meal assistance placed residents at risk for unsavory food, food-borne illness, and communicable disease. Findings included . Meal Service Observations The facility's revised 02/22/2022 Hand Hygiene policy showed staff would perform hand hygiene using soap and water or alcohol-based hand rub before handling food, and before touching another resident's utensils when helping multiple residents with meals. An observation on 01/29/2023 at 12:22 PM showed Staff L, Nursing Assistant (NA), touched the inside lip of a resident's specialized scoop plate with an ungloved hand while they were being served. An observation on 01/29/2023 at 12:54 PM showed Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident nurse call light system was functional and accessible in toilet and bathing rooms. The failure to ensure nurse call pull cords were no more than six inches from the floor in 5 of 7 sampled resident bathrooms (Rooms 42, 43, 45, 46, 14) and 2 of 2 shower rooms (1, 2), as well as to ensure the same 2 shower rooms had both a visible nurse call light outside the room and a functioning audible alert sound that could be heard in a centralized care area, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a delay of staff assistance in the event of an emergency. Findings included . Policy According to the facility's 11/28/2017 Resident Room Requirements policy, the facility would ensure resident rooms would be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$68,351 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $59,378 — penalty dated 2025-05-07
  • $8,973 — penalty dated 2024-05-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.9-1.9 vs chain
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Caldwell Care of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 1 of 5Cascadia of BoiseBoise, ID 1 of 5Cherry Ridge of CascadiaEmmett, ID 1 of 5Coeur d Alene Health of CascadiaCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Colfax Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColfax, WA 1 of 5Curry Village Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBrookings, OR 1 of 5Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 1 of 5Mount Ascension Transitional Care Of CascadiaHelena, MT 1 of 5Orchards of Cascadia, TheNampa, ID 1 of 5Spokane Valley Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadSpokane Valley, WA 1 of 5Teton Healthcare of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 2 of 5Cascadia of NampaNampa, ID 2 of 5Royal Plaza Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaLewiston, ID 2 of 5Salem Transitional CareSalem, OR 2 of 5Secora Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPortland, OR 2 of 5Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaSnohomish, WA 3 of 5Arbor Valley of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Brookfield Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBattle Ground, WA 3 of 5Clarkston Health And Rehab Of CascadiaClarkston, WA 3 of 5Clearwater Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaOrofino, ID 3 of 5Highland Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 3 of 5Northpark Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPhoenix, AZ 3 of 5Shaw Mountain of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Weiser Care of CascadiaWeiser, ID 4 of 5Canyon West of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 4 of 5Cascadia of LewistonLewiston, ID 4 of 5Cove of Cascadia, TheBellevue, ID 4 of 5Grangeville Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaGrangeville, ID 4 of 5Lewiston Transitional Care of CascadiaLewiston, ID 4 of 5Mountain Valley of CascadiaKellogg, ID 4 of 5Paradise Creek Health and Rehab of CascadiaMoscow, ID 4 of 5Stafholt Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBlaine, WA 4 of 5Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaNampa, ID 5 of 5Alderwood Park Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 5 of 5Aspen Park of CascadiaMoscow, ID 5 of 5Bend Transitional CareBend, OR 5 of 5Boswell Transitional Care Of CascadiaSun City, AZ 5 of 5Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaEugene, OR 5 of 5Fairlawn Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaGresham, OR 5 of 5Hudson Bay Health And RehabilitationVancouver, WA

Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASCADIA WASHINGTON OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
CASCADIA HC GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
CASCADIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
HAMMOND, OWENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
LAFORTE, STEPHENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
NELSON, TIMOTHYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
COLVILLE 1000 REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/01/2022
CASCADIA SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
FLEMMING, STANLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/08/2025
WEICHERS, ROGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$669K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 10%Other / private 20%

This home reported $669K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$372per resident / day
operating cost
$11,295per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$369per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505275. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next