No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Secora Rehabilitation Of Cascadia

10435 SE Cora Street, Portland, OR 97266 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 53 certified beds · (503) 760-1737 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (503) 760-1737 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607) — most recent Sep 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8935 SE Powell Blvd · (503) 772-4335 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.9 mi
4325 SE 82nd Ave · (503) 775-9603 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4415 SE 92nd Ave · (503) 788-9828 · Call to confirm hours
Park
SE Steele St & SE 100th Ave · (503) 823-2525 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
7447 SE Holgate Blvd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.9%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.3%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.1%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.8%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.9%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%5.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.0%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.4%81.2%79.4%typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

32.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF32.6%CMS range 22.3–49.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.3–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
49.2%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 48.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-28)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure access to medical records upon oral or written request within the required timeframe for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#801) reviewed for the right to access medical records. This placed residents at risk for uninformed health care needs and delayed access to records. Findings include: The facility's 10/15/22 Medical Record Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -The resident may have access to their medical record upon request to nursing leadership. -The resident and/or responsible party request for medical record documents may be made orally or in writing. It will be provided in the form and format requested, if it is readily producible in such format within two business days. 1. Resident 801 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including morbid obesity and chronic pain. The 7/5/25 Annual MDS indicated Resident 801 was cognitively intact. Record review revealed on 4/21/25 Resident 801's attorney's office had requested the facility Please: Provide Medical Records and [NAME] from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures met the minimum requirements for 1 of 1 dishwasher reviewed for the kitchen. This placed residents at risk for communicable diseases, un-sanitized dishware and utensils. Findings include: The facility's Dishwashing in the Dish Machine Policy dated 1/1/2018 states: - Test the dish machine for proper water temperatures and sanitizer levels (for low-temp machine), and record readings prior to washing the dishware. - Do not use the dish machine if sanitizer and water temperatures are not acceptable. On 3/27/25 at 11:45 AM the facility's dishwashing machine was observed with instructions stating the minimum operating temperature was 120 degrees F. On 3/27/25 the following observations were made of Staff 27 (Dietary Staff) washing dishes: - At 11:57 AM trays were washed with the water temperature reading at 90 degrees F, - At 11:59 AM plates were washed with the water temperature reading at 110 degrees F, - At 12:03 PM forks were washed with the water temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 16 and 304) reviewed for binding arbitration agreement. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed of their legal rights. Findings include: The facility's undated arbitration agreement included the following: - The Resident and/or Legal Representative understands that his Arbitration Agreement may be rescinded by giving written notice to the Facility within 10 days of its execution, this Arbitration of its execution. If not rescinded within 10 days of its execution, this Arbitration Agreement shall remain in effect for all claims arising out of the Resident's stay at the Facility. 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood effectively). Record review revealed Resident 16's legal representative signed the facility's arbitration agreement on 3/5/25. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 2 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 9 and 18) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality care. Findings include: The facility's Inservice Education/Training policy, last revised on 10/15/22, indicated employee education and in-service training was provided to assist in maintaining the continuing competence and knowledge of the staff. On 3/27/25 at 2:44 PM, Staff 3 (Clinical Resource) provided a list of annual training hours for CNA staff which revealed the following: -Staff 9 (CNA): 7.5 annual training hours and -Staff 18 (CNA): 1.5 annual training hours. On 3/28/25 at 1:06 PM, Staff 2 (Administrator-In-Training) and Staff 3 confirmed Staff 9 and Staff 18 did not complete the required 12 hours of annual in-service training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: The facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, dated 11/28/17, revealed the resident may self-administer drugs if the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determined the practice was safe as follows: -The resident had the capacity to follow directions. -The resident had comprehension of instructions for the medications they were taking. -The resident had the ability to store medications securely and safely. -Appropriate notation of determinations were documented in the resident's medical record and care plan. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder. Resident 28's 1/31/25 Annual MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. During multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 2 residents (#21) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for healthcare decisions to conflict with resident wishes. Findings include: The facility's Advance Directives/Health Care Decisions Policy dated 10/1/17 states: If a resident has not executed an advance directive, the facility advises the resident and family of the right to establish an advance directive, including but not limited to: - Offering assistance if the resident wishes to execute one or more directives. Resident 21 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including pneumonia and anxiety. A 9/16/24 Advance Directive Review form signed by Resident 21 stated Resident 21 would like assistance with formulating an advance directive plan. A review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed no advance directive on file. On 3/26/25 at 8:27 AM Resident 21 reported she/he had not received assistance with establishing an advance directive. On 3/25/25 at 2:47 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for a lack of personal hygiene and loss of dignity. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes and morbid obesity (having a body mass index greater than 40). Resident 16's 3/7/25 admission MDS indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance with bathing/showering. Resident 16's 3/13/25 bladder and bowel care plan indicated the resident was incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. Resident 16's 2/2025 and 3/2025 bathing task logs indicated the resident received bathing on the following days: - 3/8, 3/12, 3/19, 3/22 and 3/26/25. Resident 16 was not showered until eight days after being admitted and received only one shower between 3/9/25 and 3/15/25. On 3/24/25 at 10:40 AM and 3/26/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement an activity care plan and failed to include residents in group and individual activities for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 302) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for isolation, lack of social interaction and engagement. Findings include: The facility's 11/2017 Activities Policy included the following information: - The facility provides, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in the choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community. - The recreation program provides stimulation or solace, promotes a sense of usefulness, and provides a sense of belonging. - The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pressure injury wounds were comprehensively assessed and care plans were followed for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 15 and 16) reviewed for pressure ulcers and positioning. This placed residents at risk for incomplete assessments and worsening of wounds. Findings include: The facility's Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers and Other Skin Alterations, last revised 10/15/22, indicated the facility had a system in place to promote skin integrity, prevent pressure ulcer development/other skin alterations, promote healing of existing wounds and prevent further development of additional skin alterations unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated they were unavoidable. When assessing the pressure injury and/or non-pressure areas it was important that documentation addressed: -the type of injury; -the stage of the injury (a method of classifying wounds based on the depth of tissue damage); -a description…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 1 of 4 randomly selected CNA staff (#19) reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: A review of personnel records on 3/27/25 at 12:41 PM with Staff 20 (Human Resources) indicated the following employee had not received their annual performance evaluation: -Staff 19 (CNA), hire date 11/6/23: no annual performance review was completed. On 3/28/25 at 1:44 PM, Staff 20 confirmed an annual performance review for Staff 19 was not completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services and develop a comprehensive, person-centered behavioral health care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for behavioral-emotional needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral and emotional needs and a decrease in their quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Behavioral Health Services policy, last revised 10/15/22, indicated the facility: -provided trauma informed care which referred to approaches to care that treat the whole person, taking into account past trauma and the resulting coping mechanisms when attempting to understand behaviors and treat the resident; -ensured necessary care and services were person-centered and reflected the resident's goals for care; -monitored residents for signs and symptoms of depression, anxiety disorders, verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others such as screaming at others. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effect of medications. Findings include: The facility's 8/1/23 Medication Errors policy outlined the following: -A significant medication error is one which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes their health and safety. -In the event of a significant medication error, immediate action is taken as necessary to protect the resident's safety and welfare. -The prescriber is notified promptly of the error. -A medication error/adverse reaction report is completed. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including vascular dementia (cognitive decline caused by damage to the blood vessels in the brain) and a stroke. A review of Resident 35's 4/4/24 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact and received anticoagulant therapy. A review of Resident 35's health record revealed a 4/12/24 signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for mistreatment. Findings include: On 6/8/23, the Past Noncompliance was corrected when the facility implemented a plan of correction, which included: -Residents on the same unit were interviewed and no other restraints were found to be improperly utilized; -Educated the staff responsible and placed on corrective discipline; -Provided in-service training to all nursing staff for abuse and neglect which included the use of restraints; and -Provided signature sheet verifying nursing staff had completed the training. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 5/2023, with diagnoses including stroke and repeated falls. Resident 7's care plan dated 5/4/23 revealed she/he was a high fall risk and had a history of falls. Staff were to encourage Resident 7 to transfer to her/his bed, wheelchair or ambulate when she/he was on the unit to prevent further falls. On 6/7/23 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide pain management to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at increased risk of unmanaged pain. Findings include: The facility's pain management policy, revised 10/2022 recognized a resident's right to be free of pain and promoted pain relief utilizing a pain management plan during the resident's stay at the facility. Facility procedures included an initial pain assessment upon admission for all residents. Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 10/2023, with diagnoses including spinal fractures and chronic pain syndrome. Resident 3's physician orders dated 10/23/23 included a prescription for morphine tablets (15 mg), to be administered every 12 hours for pain. Resident 3's care plan dated 10/24/23 revealed she/he was at risk for acute pain related to her/his diagnoses following a spinal cord injury. Interventions were to administer medications as ordered, anticipate need for pain relief and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings for 1 of 1 resident council group reviewed. This placed the residents at risk for unaddressed concerns and needs related to resident care and quality of life. Findings include: On 11/15/23 at 11:30 AM the resident council group meeting was held in the facility dining room with state surveyors. The facility dining room did not provide privacy as the dining room was open to the lobby and living room. There were no doors or barriers to provide privacy. During the meeting, staff walked into the dining room to administer medications to one of the residents, one staff sat in the corner on her computer, the hallways were loud with staff and residents walking past the dining room and staff were vacuuming nearby while residents were speaking making it difficult to hear them. On 11/15/23 at 2:14 PM Resident 2 stated there were privacy concerns with resident council meetings. She/he confirmed the resident council meetings were held in the facility dining room. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility and for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for homelike environment and clean wheelchairs. This placed residents at risk for adverse health conditions and an unclean environment. Findings include: 1. On 11/15/23 at 9:29 AM to 10:06 AM the floor vents in the north hallway were observed with a thick layer of dust on the vent covers. On 11/15/23 at 1:40 PM the floor vents in the north hallway were observed with a thick layer of dust on the vent covers. On 11/15/23 at 10:07 AM Staff 22 (Housekeeping) acknowledged the floor vents were dirty and housekeeping was not responsible to clean them. Staff 22 stated the facility did not have a housekeeping manager. On 11/15/23 at 10:11 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the facility did not have a housekeeping manager. Staff 1 confirmed the floor vents were dirty with a thick layer of dust and needed to be cleaned. 2. Resident 26 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedure to screen new hires for 5 of 5 staff (#s 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) reviewed for background checks. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy revised 7/23/19 indicated seven key components which included the screening of potential employees for history of abuse. On 11/14/23 a random sample of five newly hired staff members was reviewed for background and reference checks with Staff 3 (Human Resources). There was no evidence criminal history checks were completed for Staff 4 (CNA), Staff 5 (CNA), Staff 6 (LPN), Staff 7 (Maintenance Manager) and Staff 8 (Maintenance Assistant) had reference checks conducted prior to their employment at the facility. On 11/14/23 at 1:42 PM Staff 3 (Human resources) acknowledged the criminal history checks for Staff 5 and Staff 6 were not completed.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident needs and preferences related to lighting were accommodated for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 4, 10, and 13) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for lack of access to lighting and an unhomelike environment. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnosis including severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnosis including cerebrovascular (condition which affects the blood vessels in the brain) disease. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnosis including severe protein-calorie malnutrition. On 11/13/23 multiple plastic bags were observed tied together in a chain which extended and hung from the cords of Residents 4, 10 and 13's overbed lights. On 11/13/23 at 10:55 AM Resident 4 stated her/his overbed light cord was too short and she/he could not independently use the light without the extension the plastic bags provided. On 11/14/23 at 1:00 PM Staff 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a menu as requested for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#153) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for decreased food intake, weight loss and lack of choices being honored. Findings include: Resident 153 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including fracture of the spine. Resident 153's 11/9/23 Mini Nutritional Evaluation indicated the resident was at risk for nutritional decline related to impaired mobility and chronic pain. Resident 153's 11/9/23 ADL Self Care Performance Deficit and At Risk for Nutritional Decline Care Plans revealed the following interventions: -Ambulation: Distant supervision with ambulation with the assistance of one person. Devices used: front wheel walker, back brace and verbal cueing. -Locomotion: substantial/maximum assistance for wheelchair mobility with the assistance of one staff. Device used: wheelchair with footrests. -Provide feeding/dining assistance as needed. -The resident received a regular diet with a regular texture and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents with formulating an advance directive for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 12, 27 and 304) reviewed for advance directive. This placed residents at risk of not having their healthcare wishes followed. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes. Resident 12's Advance Directive Review dated 4/21/23 indicated the resident wanted assistance formulating an advance directive plan. A review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed no advance directive on file. On 11/14/23 at 1:47 PM Staff 10 (Social Services Director) stated she had not followed up with the resident to assist her/him with formulating an advance directive and the resident had not completed an advance directive. 2. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including depression. Resident 27's Advance Directive Review dated 12/20/22 indicated the resident wanted assistance formulating an advance directive plan. A review of Resident 27's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess weight gain and vision for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 8 and 18) reviewed for nutrition and sensory communication. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (disease of the nerve cells). Resident 8's 5/12/23 Quarterly MDS indicated she/he weighed 119 lb (pounds). Resident 8's 11/1/23 Quarterly MDS indicated she/he experienced no weight gain over the past six months. The MDS indicated she/he weighed 142 lb. Resident 8's weight documentation revealed the following: -5/17/23 at 122 lb. -10/12/23 at 144.5 lb. -11/9/23 at 142 lb. On 11/16/23 at 2:13 PM Staff 20 (MDS Coordinator) confirmed the 5/12/23 MDS and 11/1/23 MDS weights and stated Resident 8 should have been assessed for a weight gain. On 11/16/23 at 2:28 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 8's weight were not assessed correctly on the 11/1/23 MDS. 2. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#40) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: Resident 40 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including intercranial (head) injury. Resident 40's 11/13/23 Physician Order directed staff to use a bedside impact absorbing floor mat next to the resident's bed while she/he was in bed. The 11/13/23 Care Plan for Resident 40 directed staff to provide a bedside impact absorbing floor mat next to Resident 40's bed while she/he was in bed. On 11/13/23 at 11:21 AM Resident 40 was observed in bed with the fall mat folded and placed next to her/his bedside table away from the bedside. On 11/15/23 at 2:20 PM and 11/16/23 at 10:40 AM Resident 40 was observed in bed without a fall mat on the floor at the bedside. On 11/17/23 Staff 14 (CNA) stated she obtained information to care for residents in the resident's care plan. She stated the care plan was expected to be followed for resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, person-centered care plans were revised for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 13 and 18) reviewed for nutrition, position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: The facility's 10/2022 Care Plan Policy indicated the resident care plan was reviewed after each assessment except discharge assessments, and revised based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions. 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition and epilepsy (seizure disorder). A 6/13/23 admission MDS and associated CAAs revealed Resident 13 was cognitively impaired and for staff to provide one-to-one feeding and dining assistance as needed. A Care Plan initiated on 6/19/23 revealed the resident was at risk for nutritional decline and required one-to-one supervision with meals. On 11/14/23 at 12:57 PM Resident 13 was observed in bed with her/his lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure discharge planning was developed and implemented for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 203 and 303) reviewed for discharge planning. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 303 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 303's Progress Notes dated 4/14/23 revealed the resident was discharged from the facility. A review of Resident 303's clinical record revealed no indication the facility developed and documented a discharge plan or discussed the discharge plan with the resident and the resident's representative. On 11/15/23 at 12:35 PM and 11/16/23 at 9:50 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 10 (Social Services Director) confirmed there was no discharge plan in the resident's clinical record. Staff 1 stated his expectation was for discharge planning to begin within 72 hours of a resident's admission to the facility. Staff 1 stated he would have liked better documentation of Resident 303's discharge plan. 2. Resident 203 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#206) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs. Findings include: Resident 206 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (chemical imbalance affecting the brain). The resident was discharged from the facility on 8/2/23 on a resident initiated discharge. A review of Resident 206's medical record indicated there was no discharge summary documentation. On 11/16/23 at 2:12 PM Staff 2 (DNS) was not able to provide documentation of a discharge summary for Resident 206. Staff 2 stated it was her expectation for discharge summaries to be completed upon discharge.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate grooming and toenail care for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 18 and 47) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet ADL needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 18's 10/6/23 Annual MDS revealed the resident had no speech, experienced short and long term memory problems, was severely impaired for decision making and was dependent upon staff for personal hygiene. Resident 18's 10/26/23 ADL Self Care Performance Deficit Care Plan indicated the resident required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Observations conducted on 11/13/23 at 11:29 AM and on 11/14/23 at 11:24 AM revealed Resident 18 was in bed with white hairs approximately one inch in length on her/his chin. Resident 18 was unable to answer questions or converse about her/his personal hygiene preferences on either of these occasions. On 11/13/23 at 12:41 PM Witness 2 (Family Member) stated Resident 18 was no longer able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Activity Programs Policy and Procedure dated 11/28/17 outlined the following: -The resident who was confined or choose to remain in his/her room was provided with in-room recreation programs in keeping with life-long interests. Staff assisted the resident with recreation programs that could be pursued independently. -For the resident who had withdrawn from previous activity interests/customary routines and isolated self in room/bed most of the day: a. Provide activities just before or after meal time and where the meal was served (out of the room). b. Provide in-room volunteer visits, music or videos of choice. c. Encourage volunteer-type work. d. Invite to special events with a trusted peer or family/friend. e. Engage in activities that give the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safety hazards were not accessible for 1 of 2 halls reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: Resident 37 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. On 11/13/23 at 1:42 PM the resident bathroom and shower room to the right of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with an unlocked cabinet which contained four blue disposable razors, an unlabeled personal electric shaver and five bottles of cleaning chemicals. On 11/14/23 at 5:41 AM the resident bathroom and shower room to the right of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with an unlocked cabinet which contained two blue disposable razors, an unlabeled personal electric shaver, shampoo, hair conditioner, a purple deodorant stick and four bottles of cleaning chemicals. On 11/15/23 at 9:31 AM and 10:08 AM the resident bathroom and shower room to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent complications of tube feeding for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#303) reviewed for tube feeding. This placed residents at risk for complications related to tube feeding. Findings include: Resident 303 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 303's Progress Notes dated 4/13/23 indicated the resident was bleeding profusely from her/his feeding tube site. Pressure was applied but the resident continued to bleed through the towels [used to apply pressure]. The resident's feeding tube was not completely out [dislodged from the resident's abdomen]. The resident was sent to the hospital. A review of Resident 303's clinical record revealed no indication the resident ever attempted to pull on the feeding tube. There was no explanation for the cause of the partially dislodged feeding tube and no indication a facility investigation was completed. No new interventions were developed to prevent a reoccurrence after the resident returned from from the hospital on 4/14/23. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician order and develop a care plan for the use of an oral suction machine for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#18) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 18's 10/6/23 Annual MDS revealed the resident had no speech, experienced short and long term memory problems, was severely impaired for decision making and had a feeding tube in place. On 11/13/23 at 10:00 AM and 2:34 PM Resident 18 was observed in bed and an oral suction machine at the resident's bedside. The canister of the oral suction machine contained a yellow liquid and was about a third of the way full. Resident 18 was unable to answer questions or converse about the oral suction machine on either of these occasions. No evidence was found in Resident 18's health record to indicate an order or a care plan for the oral suction machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up timely on pharmacist recommendations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including COPD (a disease which causes airflow blockage). Resident 47's 9/2023 MAR revealed the resident was administered the following medications: - Multivitamin (supplement) once daily in the AM. - Doxycycline (antibiotic) twice daily for 14 days with a start date of 9/23/23. - Magnesium Chloride (supplement) twice daily. A pharmacist's Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 9/26/23 was sent to Resident 47's physician with a recommendation to consider holding the resident's mineral supplements while the resident was administered doxycycline due to a significant interaction. Resident 47's 9/2023 and 10/2023 TARs revealed no changes were made to Resident 47's multivitamin, doxycycline and magnesium chloride administration. A copy of the 9/26/23 Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber with a handwritten…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to prevent potential contamination of the ice machine in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for potential infections related to foodborne pathogens. Findings include: The Federal Food Sanitation Rules code 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention directed facilities to ensure a direct connection may not exist between the sewage system and a drain originating from equipment in which food, portable equipment, or utensils are placed. On 10/3/22 at 9:30 AM the ice machine was observed to drain directly into the plumbing without an air gap. This allowed for backflow into the ice machine from the sewer. Staff 7 (Kitchen Manager) reported, It's been like that since I started working here in September 2022. On 10/6/22 at 2:47 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the ice machine did not have an air gap. He stated, I didn't know that was an issue.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to use the services of an RN for eight consecutive hours per day for 16 of 30 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents for unmet medical-based care needs. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports dated 9/1/22 through 9/30/22 revealed there were 16 days (9/1, 9/2, 9/3, 9/7, 9/8, 9/9, 9/10, 9/15, 9/16, 9/17, 9/21, 9/22, 9/23, 9/24, 9/29, 9/30) with no RN coverage. On 10/7/22 at 11:15 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she was under the impression if she was present in the facility she was counted as an RN on the daily staffing report and was not aware she had to dedicate time for direct patient care. Staff 2 confirmed there was no RN coverage on the identified dates.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 35, 39 and 141) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus. On 10/3/22 at 10:10 AM Resident 39 was lying in her/his bed with an overbed table within reach. A medication cup which contained two white, round pills was on Resident 39's overbed table and no nursing staff were present in the room. Resident 39's health record did not include evidence the resident was assessed for safe self-administration of medications. No documentation was found to indicate Resident 39 was able to correctly identify her/his medications and the reason for their use. On 10/5/22 at 7:03 AM and 7:30 AM Staff 4 (LPN) and Staff 5 (LPN) stated during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain, request and review copies of advance directives if available or periodically review resident wishes to execute an advance directive for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 39 and 141) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health care decisions honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 141 was admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including juvenile diabetes and end-stage kidney disease. No evidence was found in Resident 141's health record to indicate the facility discussed advance directives with the resident or resident representative. On 10/4/22 at 4:18 PM Staff 8 (Social Services) confirmed the facility did not discuss the benefit of advance directives with Resident 141 upon admission. 2. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the spine and depression. No information was found in Resident 39's health record to indicate the facility discussed advance directives with the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the building was kept in good repair for 3 of 29 resident rooms and 1 of 1 main resident lobby area reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt and unhomelike environment. Findings include: During resident screening throughout the day on 10/3/22, it was found that rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had broken window blinds. Additionally, room [ROOM NUMBER] had large scrapes and gouges on the wall next to the bed and the floor had an approximate six inch in diameter spot that appeared to be dirty flooring on the left side of the room. In the residents' lobby area, there were three leather-like arm chairs which had ripped armrests with large areas of leather missing and uncleanable fabric exposed. On 10/7/22 at 12:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and the surveyor completed a facility walk-through. Staff 1 verified the broken window blinds, ripped chairs and dirty flooring. Staff 1 stated it was important to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-10 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to document evidence of sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure a safe and orderly transfer from the facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#43) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for misinformation. Findings include: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with diagnoses including second degree burn of right foot and open wound of left foot. Resident 43's 8/22/22 Discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute care hospital. Review of Resident 43's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the resident was prepared and notified regarding the discharge to the hospital. No evidence was found to indicate Resident 43 was informed about where she/he was going and if the resident understood the reason for the discharge. On 10/10/22 at 9:09 AM Staff 2 (DNS) was notified of the findings of this investigation and acknowledged there was no documentation in Resident 43's health record which indicated the resident was informed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to invite and include residents to activities events for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#38) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for social isolation. Findings include: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) with right-sided hemiplegia (paralysis). Resident 38's 3/24/22 admission MDS indicated the resident was sometimes understood, was able to understand others and was totally dependent on staff assistance for locomotion on and off the unit. The MDS indicated Resident 38 was unable to complete the activity preferences interview, there was potential for resident isolation and the Activity Director would investigate areas of interest through trial and error. Resident 38's care plan included an activities focus, last revised 3/28/22, which included the following interventions: - Activity Director will continue to attempt to learn resident needs on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#141) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse health consequences. Findings include: Resident 141 was admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including juvenile diabetes and end stage renal disease. An 8/26/22 physician order indicated Resident 141 was prescribed insulin Lispro-aabc Solution 100 unit/ML; subcutaneously before meals per sliding scale. The order specified to notify the medical provider if the resident's blood sugar was 400 or greater. A 9/23/22 physician order indicated Resident 141 was prescribed insulin Lispro Solution 100 unit/ML; subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime per sliding scale. The order specified to notify the medical provider if the resident's blood sugars were 350 or greater. A review of Resident 141's health record indicated the following times when the resident's medical provider was not notified of blood sugars as per physician orders: -9/1/22 at 11:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders for splint devices were implemented for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 11/2017 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke). Resident 15's 8/15/22 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had upper extremity impairment to one side and used a splint. Resident 15's 10/2022 physician orders included the following: - Apply hand splint to left hand [every day], wear for four hours during the day. Monitor BID for alteration in skin. Resident 15's 10/2022 TAR revealed the following documentation for the splint physician order: - 10/3/22 days: checkmark with staff initials; - 10/3/22 evenings: NN with staff initials; - 10/4/22 days: NN with staff initials; - 10/4/22 evenings: NA with a checkmark and staff initials; - 10/5/22 days: + with a checkmark and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#91) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for discomfort. Findings include: Resident 91 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including cancer. Resident 91's 9/30/22 admission MDS indicated the resident used supplemental oxygen. On 10/3/22 at 9:56 AM Resident 91 was lying in bed in her/his room and receiving oxygen which was produced and delivered from an oxygen concentrator. The concentrator was powered on and set at two LPM (liters per minute) of oxygen. A humidifier bottle was attached to the concentrator, dated 9/21/22 and contained no fluid. A nasal cannula and tubing was attached to the oxygen concentrator and placed in Resident 91's nose. Observations from 10/3/22 at 12:12 PM through 10/6/22 at 12:03 PM revealed no humidifier bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator. On 10/05/22 at 11:16 AM Resident 91 was not in her/his room and the nasal cannula was on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-10 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate adaptive dining equipment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#38) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for decreased food intake and an undignified dining experience: Findings include: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) with right-sided hemiplegia (paralysis). Resident 38's care plan for ADL self care performance deficit with eating, last revised 3/18/22, included the intervention to use a scoop plate (an adaptive meal plate with a high, curved rim which enables food to be rolled back onto the spoon to minimize spillage) for all meals for maximum independence. Resident 38's health record included an 8/23/22 physician order for the following: - Scoop plate for resident meals to promote self-feeding abilities. Observations of Resident 38 were conducted from 10/3/22 through 10/7/22 between the hours of 7:56 AM and 4:15 PM. During these observations, Resident 38 was in her/his wheelchair in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and garbage storage areas were maintained in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 facility garbage area reviewed for sanitary disposal of garbage. This placed residents at risk for exposure to pathogens related to the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings include: On 10/6/22 at 2:01 PM old furniture, a broken door, broken service carts, empty food boxes, large empty vegetable cans (with remnants of vegetables inside), and empty half-gallon milk jugs (with remnants of milk inside) were observed to be discarded outside of the kitchen door on the pavement and grassy area adjacent to the kitchen door on the north side of the building. Staff 7 (Kitchen Manager) stated the kitchen staff placed larger food garbage items such as cans and boxes outside of the door prior to taking them to the dumpster around the corner from the kitchen door. He stated the boxes and other recyclables were also placed outside the kitchen door before they were broken down and added to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for homelike environment. This placed residents at risk for adverse health conditions related to an unclean environment. Findings include: Observations of the air intake floor vents in the north and south residents' hallways and the entrance hallway from 3/24/25 through 3/28/25 between the hours of 7:45 AM and 4:30 PM revealed accumulations of dust, fuzz and paper debris on and below the grates covering them. On 3/24/25 at 1:47 PM Resident 14 stated staff swept the dust from the floors into the vents on the floor which made them filthy. On 3/26/25 at 2:17 PM Staff 25 (Maintenance Manager) stated cleaning the floor vents was part of housekeeping's duties and he was involved if they needed to be fixed. On 3/27/25 at 10:11 AM Staff 24 (Housekeeping Manager) stated the floor vents were cleaned every quarter and their most recent cleaning was 11/21/24. She acknowledged the vents were filthy. On 3/28/25 at 12:39 PM Staff 2 (Administrator in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-03-28 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to the ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were accurate for 13 of 38 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and visitors at risk for inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: The facility's Posting Licensed and Unlicensed Direct Care Staff policy, dated 11/28/17, indicated the facility posted nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift which included facility name, current date, total number of actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed staff and the resident census. A review of the facility's DCSDRs revealed the following: From 2/15/25 through 3/24/25, 38 days were reviewed and revealed 13 days when licensed nurse staff hours were inaccurate or the postings had missing/incomplete information on 2/16/25, 2/18/25, 2/19/25, 2/28/25, 3/1/25, 3/2/25, 3/4/25, 3/10/25, 3/16/25, 3/17/25, 3/18/25, 3/21/25 and 3/24/25. On 3/27/25 at 1:41 PM, Staff 23 (Staffing Coordinator) reviewed the 2/15/25 through 3/24/25 DCSDRs and verified the reports were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-11-17 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to post notice of the availability of the previous year's survey results in areas of the facility which were prominent for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for required postings. This placed residents and visitors at risk for not being informed of the facility's survey history. Findings include: Observations on 11/13/23 revealed the state survey history binder was located on the wall outside of the nurses' station across from the therapy department near the North hall. There were no postings throughout the facility which identified the location or availability of the state survey binder. On 11/15/23 at 11:30 AM during the resident council group meeting all seven resident attendees indicated they were unaware of where to access a copy of the previous year's survey results in the facility or postings to direct residents where to locate this information. On 11/16/23 at 9:15 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the survey results were located next to the nurse's station in a public location. He acknowledged there were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Caldwell Care of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 1 of 5Cascadia of BoiseBoise, ID 1 of 5Cherry Ridge of CascadiaEmmett, ID 1 of 5Coeur d Alene Health of CascadiaCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Colfax Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColfax, WA 1 of 5Colville Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColville, WA 1 of 5Curry Village Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBrookings, OR 1 of 5Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 1 of 5Mount Ascension Transitional Care Of CascadiaHelena, MT 1 of 5Orchards of Cascadia, TheNampa, ID 1 of 5Spokane Valley Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadSpokane Valley, WA 1 of 5Teton Healthcare of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 2 of 5Cascadia of NampaNampa, ID 2 of 5Royal Plaza Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaLewiston, ID 2 of 5Salem Transitional CareSalem, OR 2 of 5Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaSnohomish, WA 3 of 5Arbor Valley of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Brookfield Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBattle Ground, WA 3 of 5Clarkston Health And Rehab Of CascadiaClarkston, WA 3 of 5Clearwater Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaOrofino, ID 3 of 5Highland Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 3 of 5Northpark Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPhoenix, AZ 3 of 5Shaw Mountain of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Weiser Care of CascadiaWeiser, ID 4 of 5Canyon West of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 4 of 5Cascadia of LewistonLewiston, ID 4 of 5Cove of Cascadia, TheBellevue, ID 4 of 5Grangeville Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaGrangeville, ID 4 of 5Lewiston Transitional Care of CascadiaLewiston, ID 4 of 5Mountain Valley of CascadiaKellogg, ID 4 of 5Paradise Creek Health and Rehab of CascadiaMoscow, ID 4 of 5Stafholt Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBlaine, WA 4 of 5Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaNampa, ID 5 of 5Alderwood Park Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 5 of 5Aspen Park of CascadiaMoscow, ID 5 of 5Bend Transitional CareBend, OR 5 of 5Boswell Transitional Care Of CascadiaSun City, AZ 5 of 5Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaEugene, OR 5 of 5Fairlawn Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaGresham, OR 5 of 5Hudson Bay Health And RehabilitationVancouver, WA

Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASCADIA OREGON OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2017
CASCADIA HC GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2017
CASCADIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/05/2025
HAMMOND, OWENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2017
LAFORTE, STEPHENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
NELSON, TIMOTHYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
TIMBERLINE CTRE TENANT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/11/2022
CASCADIA SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025
DINH, DIEUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2026
VELLODY, NITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+16.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$514K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 4%Other / private 15%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $514K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$466per resident / day
operating cost
$14,161per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$557per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next