Salem Transitional Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

74.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 357 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 194 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 71.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.06 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.00 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a heat pack was safely applied for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#76) reviewed for accidents. Resident 76 sustained burns. Findings include: On 11/23/24 the Past Noncompliance was corrected when the facility initiated an investigation, identified the root cause of the incident, and provided CNA and nurse in-service training on the use of heat packs. The training included: 1. A nurse was to approve a heat pack prior to use for each resident, 2. A barrier was to be applied between the heat source and the resident's skin, and 3. A heat pack was only to be left on for a maximum of 20 minutes. Resident 76 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with a diagnosis of kidney disease. Resident 76's 11/3/24 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact, required partial assistance with upper body dressing, and did not have skin impairment. Resident 76's 11/2024 TAR did not have interventions for a heat pack. Resident 76's Progress Notes revealed the following: -11/23/24: Resident 76 was provided a heat pack…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, and prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents (#1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in the resident developing bilateral (both sides) Stage 4 pressure ulcers to the buttocks which required hospitalization, surgical intervention and placed other residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel defined the following pressure injury stages: Stage 2 pressure ulcers: partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable, pink or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissues are not visible. Granulation tissue, slough and eschar are not present. Stage 4 Pressure Injury: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss. Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide transfer assistance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 4) reviewed for ADL assistance. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses of sepsis (unspecified organism), lobar pneumonia, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A Nursing Care Note dated 10/31/25 documented Resident 4 was assisted back to her/his room after dinner. The assisting staff left the resident alone in her/his wheelchair in the room while obtaining assistance for a two-person transfer. Staff did not return to the resident's room for over one hour. Resident 4's MDS admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 14, was cognitively intact and was dependent for wheelchair mobility. A Risk Management Report dated 10/31/25, completed by Staff 12 (LPN), confirmed Resident 4 was left alone in her/his wheelchair in the room for over an hour while awaiting transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 7 sampled residents (# 2) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for medical complications and unmet medication needs. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with a diagnosis of fracture right lower leg. Resident 2's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 13 and was cognitively intact. The facility's Risk Management report dated 8/3/25 and a Progress Note dated 8/3/25 identified the facility failed to follow a physician's STAT order placed on 8/1/25 for Lokelma (a medication used to treat high blood potassium levels) for Resident 2. The on-call provider was notified of the missed medication and instructed nursing staff to send the resident to the emergency room. Resident 2 was sent to the emergency room on 8/3/25. On 1/26/25 at 2:59 PM, Witness 2 (Hospital Social Worker) stated the facility failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews for CNA staff were completed for 5 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk due to lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of personnel profile records revealed the following. -Staff 3 (hired on 2/19/15): performance review dated 3/20/20. -Staff 4 (hired on 1/13/15): performance review dated 2/2/18. -Staff 5 (hired on 3/23/15): performance review dated 3/11/21. -Staff 6 (hired on 12/5/18): performance review dated 3/25/20. -Staff 7 (hired on 2/19/20): No performance review provided. In a 4/15/25 interview at 7:18 AM with Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), and Staff 22 (Administrator in Training), Staff 2 stated she expected annual performance reviews to be completed in a timely manner.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have a system to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 4 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 4, 5, 6, and 7) reviewed for in-service training. This placed residents at risk for care provided by incompetent staff. Findings include: A review of the facility's staff training records revealed the following: -Staff 4 (CNA), hired 1/13/15, had 1.5 hours of documented training (1/13/24-1/13/25). -Staff 5 (CNA), hired 3/23/15, had 2.25 hours of documented training (3/23/24-3/23/25). -Staff 6 (CNA), hired 12/5/18, had no documented training hours (12/5/23-12/5/24). -Staff 7 (CNA), hired 2/19/20, had 8.62 hours of documented training (2/19/24-2/19/25). In a 4/15/25 interview at 7:18 AM with Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), and Staff 22 (Administrator in Training), Staff 2 stated CNA staff were expected to complete the required 12 hours of training annually.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident preference for medication administration for 1 of 1 resident (#77) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for not having the opportunity to exercise her/his autonomy (self-governance) regarding choices. Findings include: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including stroke. A FRI (Facility Reported Incident) was received on 9/20/24. It alleged Resident 77 was administered her/his medications with a spoon, all at one time, by Staff 30 (Former CNA). Resident 77 was to receive her/his medication one pill at a time with water or applesauce. Resident 77 and Witness 7 (Friend) told Staff 30 to stop administering the medications multiple times, but she did not stop. Witness 7 went to the nurses station and found a nurse to stop Staff 30 from administering Resident 77's medications. Resident 77 and Witness 7 told Staff 14 (LPN) the resident took her/his medications one at a time with water or applesauce per her/his choice. A 9/20/24 Nursing Care Note added to special…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to honor resident choice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#77) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for choking. Findings include: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including brain cancer and stroke. A 9/20/24 FRI was received on 9/20/24 which alleged Staff 30 (Former CNA) administered medication to Resident 77. The 4/2019 facility policy, Administering Medications indicated: -Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so. -The 10/2024 Scope of Practice Nurses vs CNAs indicated when medications are left in the resident's room, (usually not allowed) notify the nurse; do not administer or assist. The FRI indicated Staff 29 (CMA) entered Resident 77's room with her/his morning medications and realized Staff 30 was providing personal care for Resident 77. Staff 29 placed the resident's medication on the bedside table and left the resident's room. Staff 30 attempted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify office of the State long-term care ombudsman of the transfer/discharge for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 26 and 52) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of notification of their transfer/discharge. Findings include: Resident 26 admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure and sepsis. A 3/15/25 progress note indicated Resident 26 was sent to the hospital on 3/17/25 for shortness of breath. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed no evidence the Long-term care ombudsman's office was notified of the resident's transfer/discharge. On 3/18/25 at 12:33 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the ombudsman was not notified of Resident 26's discharge to the hospital. 2. Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Resident 52's Progress Notes revealed on 3/18/25 she/he was discharged to the hospital. Resident 52's clinical record did not indicate the State's LTCO's (Long Term Care Ombudsman)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident representative a bed hold policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge related to their right to return to the facility. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Resident 52's 3/11/25 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively impaired. Resident 52's Progress Notes revealed she/he was discharged to the hospital on 3/18/25. Resident 52's clinical record did not indicate Witness 6 (Spouse) was notified of the facility's bed hold policy. On 4/7/25 at 3:28 PM Witness 6 stated on 3/18/25, when Resident 52 was hospitalized , she/he was not notified of the bed hold policy. On 4/10/25 at 10:27 AM Staff 23 (Admissions) stated she provided the bed-hold policy to residents and/or their representative upon admission to the facility and when residents were hospitalized . If a resident was hospitalized she called the resident or representative and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 77) reviewed for medication administration.This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration. Findings include: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including brain cancer and stroke. On 9/20/24, a FRI was received on 9/20/24 which alleged Staff 30 (Former CNA) administered medication to Resident 77. The 4/2019 facility policy; Administering Medications indicated: -Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so. -The 10/2024 Scope of Practice Nurses vs CNAs indicated when medications are left in the resident's room, (usually not allowed) notify the nurse; do not administer or assist. The FRI indicated Staff 29 (CMA) entered Resident 77's room with morning medications and found Staff 30 was providing personal care for Resident 77. Staff 29 left the resident's medication on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' pressure injuries were monitored and care plans were updated for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 52 and 77) reviewed for pressure ulcers and choices. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure injuries. Findings include: 1. Resident 52 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of blood loss anemia. Resident 52's care plan for skin impairment initiated 3/7/25 and last revised on 3/10/25 revealed she/he was at risk for pressure ulcers due to weakness. Interventions included weekly skin assessments and new skin impairments were to be reported to the nurse. Resident 52's 3/18/25 admission MDS revealed Resident 52 was admitted to the facility with no pressure ulcers but had maroon discoloration to her/his great toes. Staff were to monitor her/his skin weekly. Resident 52's 3/30/25 admission Nursing Database revealed Resident 52 did not have skin impairment. Resident 52's Progress Notes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,523 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,523 — penalty dated 2024-01-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR