No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia

800 10th Street, Snohomish, WA 98290 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 91 certified beds · (360) 568-3161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$195,291 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $195,291 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
629 Av D, Ste 1 · (360) 568-1554 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1115 13th St · (360) 568-4153 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.3 mi
1119 13th St · (360) 568-7215 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1017 13th St · (360) 568-2512

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms63.6%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.9%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.6%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.7%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.9%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.1%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%13.4%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.0%CMS range 42.0–63.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.8–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.0–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.65
RN hoursweekends
56.0%
Total nursing turnover
54.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-01)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who engaged in smoking had adequate supervision to protect residents and/or staff from potential fire hazards for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 51 and 32) reviewed for smoking. This failure placed all residents at serious risk for injury related to unsafe smoking practices and constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ).The failed practice resulted in an IJ on 04/26/2026 when the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was safe from burns and fire. The IJ was removed on 04/28/2026 after the facility provided a safe receptacle for properly disposing of cigarette butts, reassessed and educated staff and residents of the facility's no smoking policy and confiscated residents smoking paraphernalia. Findings included.Review of a facility policy, titled Non-Smoking Campus- Smoke Free, with revised date 09/12/2025 documented:The resident or representative sign an acknowledgement that the facility is a smoke-free environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess the increased risk for skin breakdown, follow written policy and procedures, develop, and implement timely interventions necessary to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers (PUs)for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3 and 4), reviewed for PUs. These failures caused harm to Resident 1 who admitted to the facility with a Stage 2 PU which deteriorated into an unstageable PU with osteomyelitis (bone infection), debridement (removal of dead [necrotic] or infected skin tissue to try to help wound heal), and a hospital treatment. developed a facility acquired unstageable PU with osteomyelitis (bone infection) and Residents 2, 3, and 4 experienced harm when they developed facility acquired PU's with partial and full thickness skin loss, and pain. This failed practice placed other residents at risk for the development of PUs, serious harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The National…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement care plan interventions related to bed height and mattress type to prevent accidents/falls for 1 of 1 sample resident (Resident 7) reviewed for falls and accident hazards. Resident 7 experienced harm when they fell out of bed and sustained a left hip fracture (broken bone), pain, and required hospitalization. These failures placed residents at risk for potential falls, injuries, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Response & Management, revised on 05/17/2021, showed for a fall with injury, staff should avoid moving the resident their status is fully evaluated to prevent further injury if an injury occurred as a result of the fall. Staff were to evaluate the resident's limb strength and motion. Don't perform range of motion (ROM) exercises if a fracture is suspected or if the resident complains of any odd sensations or limited movement. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently recognize and respond to complaints of pain and failed to consistently implement wound care recommendations related to pain management in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 55) reviewed for pain management. Resident 55 experienced harm when nursing staff failed to recognize and respond to complaints of pain and failed to implement wound care recommendations related to pain management. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmanaged pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 55 admitted to the facility 06/30/2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes, history of bleeding in the brain, and throat cancer. The resident required extensive assistance for activities of daily living and was alert with some memory impairment but was able to communicate and respond appropriately to questions such as describing their pain level and location. Review of Resident 55's electronic medical record, dated 10/21/2023, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident from unwanted touch for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for sexual abuse. Resident 2 experienced psychosocial harm, based on a reasonable person concept, when they received a non-consensual sexual touch from Resident 1, who had been identified in the past of inappropriate behaviors and sexually suggestive statements with female staff and a history of wandering into Resident 2's room on multiple occasions. The facility failed to identify an incident of sexual abuse, report it timely to the state agency, and potentially placed cognitively impaired residents at risk for unwanted sexual touch and psychosocial harm. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, revised on 08/01/2023, showed the facility respects the resident right to be free from abuse and neglect. The facility identifies residents most at risk of neglect and abuse. The policy also showed that allegations of sexual abuse are reported to the state agency within two hours if there was alleged abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-11-08 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit a resident to return (re-admit) to the facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 2), reviewed for transfer to the hospital when the resident was ready to return to the facility after a hospital stay. Resident 2 experienced harm and a decreased quality of life when they expressed unnecessary psychosocial distress when the resident was not permitted to return to the facility where she had lived since June 2023, and felt they had nowhere to safely discharge. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, Transfer and Discharge, revision date 10/15/2022, showed residents who are sent emergently to the hospital are considered facility-initiated transfers because the residents return is generally expected. The facility allows residents whose hospitalization exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan to return to the facility immediately upon first availability of a bed in a semi-private room even if the resident has an outstanding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored under sanitary conditions in two of two nourishment refrigerators. Failure to ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored and maintained placed residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included . According to the Food and Drug Administration food code, refrigerator temperatures must be maintained below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (f). In an interview and observation on unit 2 on 04/28/2026 at 9:48 AM with Staff E, Resident Care Manager, the unit 2 nourishment refrigerator temperature read 47 degrees (f). There was no temperature log observed. The refrigerator was observed to contain individual yogurts, applesauce, one carton of thickened lemon drink, one carton of fortified shake, and half sandwiches wrapped in plastic. Staff E stated the kitchen staff stocked the fridge and monitored the temperatures. In an interview and observation on unit 1 on 04/28/2026 at 10:03 AM with Staff Z, Certified Nursing Assistant stated the kitchen took care of the refrigerators. The unit 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment addressed the physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plant considerations that are necessary to care for its identified resident smoking population. Failure to thoroughly assess all factors associated with resident smoking placed residents at risk for adverse events related to smoking safety.Findings included.Review of a facility policy, titled Non-Smoking Campus- Smoke Free, with revised date 09/12/2025 documented:The resident or representative sign an acknowledgement that the facility is a smoke-free environment upon admission.The facility staff are responsible for enforcing the Smoke-Free Policy.Employees, contractors and visitors are expected to comply with the smoke-free policy while on facility property. Employees who choose to smoke may do so off property or within their personal vehicles.In an observation and interview on 04/26/2026 at 9:00 AM, Resident 51 was observed sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a response to concerns voiced by 1 of 1 resident groups (Resident Council) that had concerns. The failure to respond to Resident Council about their concerns left the issues unresolved and resulted in the Resident Council process being ineffective at improving resident quality of life.Findings included.Review of Resident Council Minutes for December 2025 documented there were concerns for beverages arriving early before meals, nursing assistants not providing care properly and not getting residents up when they preferred, nursing assistants complaining about their employment, televisions not working properly with no service in some rooms, and medications not given on time by nurses. The section, on the Resident Council Minutes, titled, Recommendations/Follow-up was blank.Review of the Grievance Resolution Log for December 2025 showed no documentation or resolution to the noted concerns from Resident Council from December 2025.Review of the Resident Council Minutes for January 2026 documented there were concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to periodically inform residents of their rights after residents were admitted to the facility for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 7, 20, 35, 40, 49, 67 and 75) when reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Findings included .On 04/28/2026 at 2:07 PM during resident council, Residents 7, 20, 35, 40, 49, 67, and 75 all stated they the staff did not talk about or review the rights of the residents in the facility. When asked if resident rights were reviewed at resident council meetings, they all stated they were not.Review of the resident council meeting minutes for November 2025 through April 2026 showed no documentation/confirmation that resident rights were reviewed.In an interview on 04/30/2026 at 3:17 PM Staff A, Administrator, stated they did not know if resident rights were routinely reviewed with residents in resident council or otherwise.Reference: WAC 388-97-0300(1)(a)

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and updated Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - a document informing Medicare beneficiaries that their covered services will be terminated and providing information on their appeal rights) for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 15, 91, 90 and 63) reviewed for liability notice. The facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN-a form to inform their responsibilities for the services cost when Medicare discontinues) for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 15 and 63) reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. The facility failed to utilize the current CMS-approved forms and failed to ensure proper complete the forms as the facility staff signed in the place of the resident and/or representatives; the facility failed to document an explanation of appeal rights and provide copies to residents and/or representatives. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (4,6 and 34) selected for medication review were free from unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and decreased quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Drugs dated 04/22/2025 stated Psychotropic medications and those used to manage behavioral symptoms must be clinically justified, individualized, and aligned with the resident's assessed needs, goals of care, and accepted standards of practice. The facility prohibits the unnecessary use of psychotropic drugs including any medication prescribed in excessive dose, excessive duration, without clear indication, or without adequate monitoring. <RESIDENT 4> Resident 4 admitted [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's physician's orders with a print date 04/27/2026 showed an order for an antianxiety medication ordered on 04/16/2026 and available every four hours as needed for anxiety. Review of Resident 4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 6 of 8 residents (Residents 4, 6, 9, 34, 42, and 51), reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR - a federal requirement which identifies individual with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) or intellectual or developmental disabilities to provide appropriate services), received the required screening for necessary services. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified mental health needs.Findings included .Review of a facility policy, titled, Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review (PASRR) Process, revised date 08/29/2025, documented a positive Level 1 screen necessitated an in-depth evaluation of the individual by the state designated authority, known as PASRR Level 2. If a resident was admitted with an exemption and the stay was going to last more than 30 days, then the state designated authority must conduct a Level 2 review within 40 calendar days. <RESIDENT 9> Resident 9 admitted to the facility with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food services met the dietary needs and preferences for residents on 2 of 2 resident units, 1 of 1 resident group and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 77) reviewed for food. Failure to ensure snacks were available, preferences were honored and alternates of similar nutritional value were provided during meals placed residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT COUNCIL/SNACK AVAILABILITY> Review of Resident Council Minutes dated 02/06/2026, documented snacks were never available, and the nursing assistants didn't know where they were located. Review of Resident Council Minutes dated 03/06/2026, documented food that was meant to be cold was placed on warm plates during meals. In an interview 04/27/2026 at 1:06 PM, Residents 44 and 49 stated snacks were not available, at times they might not have any, or only peanut butter and jelly sandwiches were offered. In an interview on 04/28/2026 at 2:12 PM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in which resident's records were accurate, complete and readily accessible for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for closed record, 1 of 2 residents (Resident 9) reviewed for Advance Directive, and 1 of 1 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for Hospice Services. This failure placed the residents at risk of a delay in care or services after discharge, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Medical Record, revised dated [DATE], documented medical records were maintained on each resident were to be complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized. <RESIDENT 9> Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a guardian in place. Resident 9's electronic medical record showed letters of guardianship with expiration dates of [DATE]. In an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 AM, Staff C, Social Services stated they were unaware that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow residents to make choices about daily routines for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 51) reviewed for choices. The facility's failure to accommodate resident choice placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the quarterly minimum data set assessment (an assessment of care needs), dated 04/22/2026, the resident was cognitively intact.During an interview on 04/26/2026 at 10:05 AM, Resident 51 reported they were awakened at least three times a night for medications and to have their blood pressure and heart rate checked. Resident 51 reported that they had a difficult time getting back to sleep after they had been awakened. Resident 51 stated they had spoken with the medication nurse about not wanting to be awakened at night, but the staff did not adjust their schedule.Review of Resident 51's Medication Administration sheets from 04/01/2026- 04/28/2026 showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review-an assessment used to identify people [resident] referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], intellectual disabilities [ID], or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing facility for long term care) Coordinator after a significant change in mental condition for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 37), reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet mental health services necessary to obtain the resident's highest level of psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life.Finding included .Resident 37 admitted to the facility 01/04/2024 with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease (progressive movement disorder of the nervous system), major depressive disorder, and anxiety.Review of Resident 37's PASRR dated 01/04/2024 documented they had indicators of serious mental illness but did not require a level two evaluation due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 6 and Resident 52) reviewed for unnecessary medication review; 1 of 2 residents (Resident 29) for blood glucose monitoring; and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 6) for skin observation and treatment. The facility failed to ensure physician-ordered parameters were followed for blood pressure medication administration, failed to perform blood glucose (test to check sugar level in the blood) checks prior to meals, and failed to provide treatments for a wound. These failures placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes, medication errors, infections, clinical complications, and unmet needs.Findings included .According to the facility policy titled Skin Integrity & Wound Prevention with revision date of 09/14/2025, new areas of concern identified are documented in the medical record, provider notified with treatment orders obtained and care plan updated. <WOUND> <RESIDENT 6>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 resident (Resident 34) who had been continent of bladder prior to admission to the facility, received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible. This failure placed residents at an increased risk of urinary tract infections, discomfort, loss of dignity, and decreased quality of life.Findings included . In a review of the facility policy titled Urinary Assessment & Toileting Program revised 09/15/2025 documented the facility would ensure residents were evaluated for bladder function and continence upon admission and as needed. Residents who were incontinent of bladder would receive appropriate care and services to prevent infection and restore bladder function as possible.Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include falls with concussion, Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease characterized by cognitive decline, memory loss and behavioral changes) and history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 residents (Residents 37 and 42) reviewed for respiratory care and services were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that filters air to deliver concentrated medical-grade oxygen) was set to the ordered rate and failed to ensure oxygen supplies were appropriately maintained, changed regularly and dated. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving care and services that were not physician ordered, unmet care needs and potential for complications of the respiratory system.Findings included .Review of a facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, Safety, Storage and Maintenance with revised date 08/04/2023 documented:monitor oxygen parameters as needed and/or as ordered,change oxygen supplies weekly,equipment should be dated when set up or changed out,Humidifier (container of sterile water to add moisture to oxygen)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 4,6 and 52) and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 20). Failure to follow providers orders for pain medication parameters and provide non-pharmacological interventions for pain placed residents at risk for adverse effects of unnecessary medication and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 4> Resident 4 admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses to include dementia and chronic pain. Review of Resident 4's physician's orders with a print date 04/27/2026 documented an order for pain medications: Acetaminophen (non-narcotic pain medication) every four hours as needed for pain rating between 1-5, Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) every four hours as needed for pain. Review of Resident 4's routine pain monitor from April 1-27, 2026, documented their pain rating as 0 on 24 days, 2 on one day, and 1 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications securely for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 37 and 49) reviewed for medications stored in their room and failed to ensure 1 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 2 treatment carts were locked when left unsupervised by staff. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications and for having unintended access to drugs that should have been securely stored.Findings included . On 04/26/2026 at 9:39 AM observed the treatment cart located outside of nursing station two, unlocked. The treatment cart contained scissors, zinc oxide ointment (medicated ointment), hydrocortisone cream (medicated cream), Vaseline, iodine antiseptic pads (medicated pads), silicone cream, and medicated wound dressings.In an interview on 04/26/2026 at 9:39 AM Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated treatment carts were expected to be locked when not in use and secured by staff.In an observation on 04/26/2026 at 12:15 PM observed the medication cart on the second hall unlocked outside of nursing station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents (Resident's 11 and 79) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- personal protective equipment (PPE) required for staff during high contact care activities), 1 of 1 observation of pericare (washing of the genitalia and buttocks), 1 random observation of medical equipment sanitation and 1 of 4 nurses (Staff U) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure the staff to wear appropriate PPE in accordance with recommended national standards; failed to ensure staff were compliant with hand hygiene during pericare; failed to ensure appropriately disinfecting reusable medical equipment; and failed to ensure proper barriers were used for medication items. These failures placed all residents and staff at risk of potential infection. Findings included .According to the facility policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for care planning. The failure to ensure the comprehensive care plan was person-centered to maintain and or attain the resident's highest practicable well-being placed the residents at risk of not receiving services and monitoring that would meet their needs, adverse health effects and a decreased quality of life. Findings included .Review of a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences, revised date 09/03/2025, documented the facility will ensure that each resident has a timely, person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice. The care plan will reflect the individual conditions, risks, needs, behaviors, cultural values, and preferences, and will include measurable goals, appropriate interventions, and realistic timeframes. The plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders and provide monitoring of fall related injuries and interventions for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4), document fall related injuries on the reporting log for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 3 and 4), and documentation of fracture in the investigation summary for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for accidents. The facility failure to provide documentation and monitoring of injuries, non-weight bearing status, braces and slings placed residents at risk for further injury, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of a facility policy titled Fall Response and Management, revised 08/21/2026, showed; The facility is committed to ensuring that residents are provided with an environment free from accident hazards and that residents receive appropriate supervision and assistive devices to minimize fall risk, while promoting resident autonomy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge plan was in place for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharges. The facility failed to provide discharge instructions, discuss medications, notify family and provider and provide community resources upon discharge. These failures placed residents at risk of an unsafe discharge and risk for medical complications.Findings included . According to the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge revised on 10/15/2022, documented that in a situation where the resident signs out of the facility, or leaves Against Medical Advise (AMA), the medical record must have evidence of discussion with the resident to make it a safe discharge.Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment, had impaired vision and used a front wheeled walker. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents for one of one resident (Resident 1) reviewed for medication errors. This failure prevented the facility from identifying the potential causes of the occurrence, placed residents at risk for repeated errors, substantial injury, left unanswered questions whether the incident was potentially related to neglect, and unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book), dated October 2015, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It includes guidelines for prevention and protection, incident identification, investigation and reporting for nursing homes, the facility investigation should end with the identification of who was involved in the incident, and what, when, where, why, and how the incident happened including the probable or reasonable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for intravenous (IV) hydration use was free from medication errors. Failure to follow physician orders to administer IV hydration placed the resident at risk for complications from dehydration, a decline in their condition, and decreased quality of life. Findings included .Review of a facility policy titled Medication Error revised 08/01/2023 showed;Medications are managed and safely administered to residents with a minimum of medication errors (not 5% or greater) and residents are free of any significant medication errors. Definitions:Medication ErrorMeans the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with: The observed preparation or administration of drugs or biologicals that are not in accordance with:a. Prescriber's Ordersb. Manufacturer's specifications (not recommendations) regarding the preparation and administration of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct an investigation for 1 of 3 sampled Residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Failure to conduct an investigation to identify the root cause(s) and all contributing factors related to Resident 1's incident, placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, risk for injury, and unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book), dated October 2015, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It includes guidelines for prevention and protection, incident identification, investigation and reporting for nursing homes, the facility investigation should end with the identification of who was involved in the incident, and what, when, where, why, and how the incident happened including the probable or reasonable cause. <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0645 — widespread
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 6 residents (Residents 25, 26, 59 and 60) had an accurate Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) on or before admission to the facility. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and at risk of not receiving appropriate mental health support/services needed. Findings included . Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASARR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability; 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting); and 3) receive the services they need in those settings. The intent of this process is to ensure each resident in a nursing facility is screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in care conferences (a collaborative care plan meeting where a resident's care is discussed and coordinated by a team of health care providers, family members and residents) for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 3, 27, and 60) reviewed for participation in care planning. This failure placed residents at risk of not being allowed to be involved and informed about care and services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 27> Resident 27 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include pneumonia and vascular dementia. According to the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], Resident 27 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 27's medical record showed no documentation a quarterly care conference had been completed. <RESIDENT 60> Resident 60 admitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or offer assistance to residents and/or their representatives to formulate Advance Directives (AD) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 60) reviewed for ADs. These failures placed residents at risk of losing their right to have their stated preferences/decisions honored regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care. Findings included . An AD is A written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. <RESIDENT 60> Resident 60 admitted on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], Resident 60 had no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 60's medical record document titled Advance Directive Review dated 11/05/2024 documented Resident 60 would like to pursue formulating an AD. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 3 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 3, 34 and 31) reviewed for care planning. The failure to review and revise care plans by the interdisciplinary team placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, adverse health effects and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, revised date 10/15/2022, documented care plans are updated with any status change and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions. <RESIDENT 3> Resident 3 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include shingles zoster without complications. Review of Resident 3's March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Resident 3 was taking antiviral medication for herpes (viral infection) daily since 02/01/2024. Review of Resident 3's care plan, print date 03/27/2025, under the focus of potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free from accident hazards of 1 of 3 residents (Resident 59) reviewed for environmental hazards. These failures placed residents at risk for possible injury and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease and on hospice care. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident had severely impaired cognition. In an observation on 03/24/2025 at 10:34 AM, Resident 59 was in bed with a blanket over their head. The bed was in the lowest position with a scoop mattress (a special type of mattress with raised sides designed to prevent residents from rolling out of bed) on the left side of the bed on the floor and the bed was placed against the wall. Review of Resident 59's physician's orders on 03/28/2025 did not show any orders for the bed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 6 residents (Residents 26 and 59) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect a person's mind, emotions and behavior, used to treat mental health conditions like anxiety, depression, and psychosis). These failures placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications, for adverse events and diminished quality of life. <RESIDENT 26> Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (a mental health disorder that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs, called mania and lows known as depression). Review of Resident 26's physician's orders on 03/26/2025, showed the following order: Give Sertraline Hydrochloride (HCl) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for Depression, dated 09/25/2024. Review of Resident 26's Pharmacy Recommendation dated 03/07/2025, showed gradual dose reduction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 26) selected for medication review. This failure placed Resident 26 at risk for adverse outcome related to receiving insulin when blood sugar was below the blood sugar parameter ordered. Findings included . Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM - a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent high blood sugar). According to the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE] the resident had intact cognition. In a record review on 03/26/2025, Resident 26's physician's order documented: - Insulin Glargine (long-acting insulin), inject 25 units (U) subcutaneously (SQ - method of administering medication by injecting a drug into the fatty tissue layer beneath the skin) one time a day for DM. Hold for blood sugar (BS) less than (<) 90 and provide snack.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 27), reviewed for dental care, received timely assistance to coordinate appropriate denture services. This failure placed residents at risk for difficulty chewing, diminished quality of life and a loss of dignity. Findings included . <RESIDENT 27> Resident 27 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include pneumonia and vascular dementia. According to Resident 27's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, and upper and lower dentures. The MDS documentation included: -Section L0200 A was documented No for broken or loose fitting full or partial denture (chipped, cracked, uncleanable, or loose) -Section L0200 F was documented No for mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty chewing. In an interview on 03/25/2025 at 11:37 AM, Collateral Contact (CC) 1 stated Resident 27's dentures were old and broken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff used personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines when caring for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 42 and 10) with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- infection control practices designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes by focusing on gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities). These failures placed residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 42> Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include open wound. Review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident 42 had stage 4 pressure ulcer and moisture associated skin damage. Review of a progress note on 03/27/2025 at 9:46 AM, documented a consulting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Failure to conduct a thorough investigation to identify the root cause(s) and all contributing factors related to Resident 1's incident, placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, risk for injury, and ineffective care planning. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book), dated October 2015, showed A thorough investigation is a systemic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It seeks to determine if abuse, neglect, abandonment, personal and/or financial exploitation or misappropriation of resident property occurred, and how to prevent further occurrences. Review of the facility policy titled, Accidents and Supervision to prevent accidents, revised on 10/15/2022, showed the facility provides an environment that is free from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely review and revise the care plan to accurately reflect the care needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 7), reviewed for timely care plan revision. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and potential harm. Findings included . Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include vascular dementia (a general term for problems with reasoning, planning, memory, and other thought processes cause by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain) with other behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. On re-admission to the facility on [DATE], additional diagnoses to include left femur fracture. Review of Resident 7's care plan, dated 06/20/2022, showed a focus area of impaired mobility with risk for falls related to impaired mobility, and a history of falls. Interventions directed staff to keep the adjustable bed in position for safe transfers and lock bed brakes. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the direct care data of both contract and agency staff was accurately entered into the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system for tracking staffing in nursing homes) for 1 of 1 quarter (Quarter 3) for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023(which included July 2023 through September 2023) reviewed for PBJ reporting. This failure caused the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to have inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels which had the potential to impact care and services provided to all the residents in the facility. Findings included . Review of the PBJ information submitted by the facility showed that for Quarter 3, 2023, the facility was 301 hours short the required hours. In an interview on 03/07/2024 at 9:30 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing provided the PBJ information that was submitted for Quarter 3. Staff B stated they were unaware that behavioral health consultant hours could be submitted towards their 3.4 direct care hours per resident day (HPRD) staffing hours requirement. Staff B stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required beneficiary notices for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 227, 228 and 229) reviewed for liability notices. This failure placed the residents at risk of not being fully informed of their rights to appeal the decision to end skilled services and/or the potential costs of continued services if the residents wished to stay at the facility. Findings included . <RESIDENT 227> Review of Resident 227s medical record, showed the resident was discharged from a Medicare Covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining on 12/20/2023. The required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - a form that shows insurance will no longer cover services) was not provided to the resident. The resident discharged home without being fully informed of their appeal rights or costs of continued services. In an interview on 02/06/2024 at 8:48 AM, Staff B, interim Administrator, stated they could not find record the NOMNC form had been provided to Resident 227. <RESIDENT 228> Review of Resident 228's medical record, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI -instructions for when and how to use the RAI that include instruction for completion of the RAI as well as structured frameworks for synthesizing the MDS and other clinical information) Utilization Guidelines process was followed for 4 of 17 sampled residents (Residents 55, 57, 13 and 52) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. This failure placed residents at risk for inadequate care plan development and diminished quality of care. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, showed the RAI consists of three basic components: the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), the Care Area Assessment (CAA - a systematic process to interpret the triggered information from the MDS assessment to assess the potential problem and determine if the area should be care planned) process, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses (LN's) and Nursing Assistants Certified (NAC) had the appropriate competencies, skills sets and proficiencies to provide nursing and related services for each resident in accordance with the facility assessment when nursing staff failed to demonstrate the knowledge, skills and abilities to perform nursing services for 5 of 6 sampled staff (Staff F, G, H, T, and W) reviewed for competent nursing staff. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The Facility Assessment, last reviewed 11/13/2023, showed staff competencies are completed based on required education/identified needs/changes in: i.e. Abuse/Neglect, Elder Justice Act (the first comprehensive federal law to address the abuse, neglect, and exploitation of older adults), Compliance, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA, to protect residents from the unauthorized sharing of their private health information), Life Safety, Emergency Services,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures and to ensure medications were stored in the medication room refrigerator under proper temperature controls in 2 of 2 (Hall 1 and Hall 2) medication refrigerators observed. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective vaccines and medications with unknown potency. Findings included . <HALL 1> During an observation on 02/07/2024 10:39 AM, the Hall 1 medication refrigerator contained 21 Insulin (manages sugar in the body) pens, 1 Emergency Kit containing insulin, 6 intravenous antibiotics (medication to treat infection), 1 unopened multiple dose lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) bottle, and 1 multi-dose Tubersol (a prescription solution to test for Tuberculosis which is a potentially serious infectious disease that mainly affect the lungs) vial. Review of Hall 1's medication room temperature log, dated January 2024, showed 15 missing readings for the AM shift and 20 missing readings for the PM shift. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals that accommodated residents' food preferences and choices regarding types of food to eat and portion size for 7 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 50, 16, 19, 59, 52, 176, and 60) reviewed for food preferences. This failure placed residents at risk for dissatisfaction with food, weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Dining Standards, dated 09/10/2020, showed: - Residents rights and wishes are respected, and reasonable accommodations are made for food preferences and amount of food to eat. - Tray cards are validated against items presented on meal trays for diet type, textures, fluids, likes and dislikes, prior to food delivery. In an interview and record review on 02/07/2024 at 8:43 AM, Staff K, Dietary Manager/Chef, stated activities staff hands out Select Menu's (a weekly menu with food choices and alternative food options). A review of Select Menu's for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 food workers (Staff I, J, and K) with beards had restrained their facial hair to prevent food contamination. The failure to ensure food workers restrained their facial hair placed residents at risk for food contamination and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Personal Hygiene When Handling Food, dated 10/15/2022, showed hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, and beard restraints were to always be worn in the kitchen, and facial hair was to be neatly trimmed, and if longer than trimmed eyebrows, it was to be covered by a mask or beard guard. In an observation/interview on 02/06/2024 at 10:25 AM, Staff I, Cook, Staff J, Cook, and Staff K, Dietary Manager/Chef, were all observed working in the facility kitchen, all three had beards of several inches. Staff I and J were wearing no beard restraints, Staff K was wearing a surgical mask, but their beard protruded a few inches below the mask. Staff K was interviewed, and they stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 sampled employees, (Staff F, Staff G, and Staff H) reviewed for training, had the required 12 hours per year of in-services and required annual dementia training. This failure placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . Review of facility employee records showed: Staff F, Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC), had a hire date of 02/01/2022. For the year of January 2023 to December 2023, the facility was unable to provide documentation Staff F had completed the required 12 hours of annual in-services or dementia training. Staff G, NAC, had a hire date of 02/01/2022. For the year of January 2023 to December 2023, the facility was unable to provide documentation Staff G had completed the required 12 hours of annual in-services or dementia training. Staff H, NAC, had a hire date of 02/01/2022. For the year of January 2023 to December 2023, the facility was unable to provide documentation that Staff H had completed the required 12 hours of annual in-services or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a homelike environment for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 55 and 17) reviewed for environment. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Environment, revision date 11/29/2019, showed that a homelike environment de-emphasizes institutional character 'as close to private home as possible' and stated residents with dementia or without family or friends and with few assets are assisted, to the extent possible, with making their bedroom homelike, if they so desire. <RESIDENT 55> Record review showed Resident 55 had been in their current room since 10/10/2023. The record showed the resident had cognitive impairment. In an interview and observation on 02/04/2023 at 1:15 PM, Resident 55's room had blank white walls with no pictures or any other personal or homelike items. The resident stated the only thing they did was stare at the second hand on their clock, watch TV, or watch traffic drive past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a significant change in status for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 55), reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device). Failure to identify and complete a Significant Change in Status assessment, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - instructions for when and how to use the RAI that include instruction for completion of the RAI as well as structured frameworks for synthesizing the MDS and other clinical information) Criteria, placed residents at risk for inadequate care planning and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument, User's Manual, Version 3.0, dated October 2019, showed that a Significant Change in Status assessment was appropriate when there was a determination that there had been a significant change in a resident's condition (a major decline in a resident's status that affected two or more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment of care needs) for 3 of 15 sampled residents (Residents 5, 61, and 55) reviewed for accuracy of the MDS. Failure to accurately assess the residents placed them at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 5> Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, and Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness). Review of Resident 5's medical record, showed the Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition (RC) and a serious mental illness (SMI) prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) was completed on 09/07/2022. Review of the PASRR Level II (an in-depth evaluation to determine whether the resident requires specialized rehabilitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations were acted upon for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 52) reviewed for nutrition. Failure to review and initiate nutrition recommendations placed residents at risk for weight loss, a decline in nutritional status, and related complications. Resident 52 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include iron deficiency anemia (blood lacks adequate healthy red blood cells) and Stage IV (wound exposing muscle and/or bone) pressure ulcer (bed sore). Review of Resident 52's nutrition comprehensive evaluation, dated 10/17/2023, showed the Registered Dietician (RD) recommended the resident receive ProSource (liquid protein supplement) 30 milliliters (ml) twice a day due to increased protein needs and wound healing. Review of Resident 52's nutrition review, dated 11/01/2023, showed the resident had 2.4% weight loss since admission to the facility. The RD had recommended ProSource 30ml twice a day on 10/19/2023 and was still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 61) reviewed for respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. Failure of the facility to ensure oxygen (O2) delivery and use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, machine that uses air pressure to keep airways open) was provided according to physician orders, monitor respiratory status, and maintain oxygen equipment, placed residents at risk of discomfort and a potential negative outcome. Findings included . Review of a facility policy, titled, Oxygen Therapy, revised 08/04/2023, showed: - The facility staff were to monitor resident's tolerance to O2 for relief of physical symptoms, relief of difficulty breathing and/or improved O2 saturation. - Staff to provide ongoing documentation of routine and as needed (PRN) use. - Staff would change disposable O2 equipment per manufacturer directives. Review of a facility policy, titled, Respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 13) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free of significant medication errors. Failure to accurately review and transcribe admission medication orders placed residents' health and safety in jeopardy. Resident 13 admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident 13's current physician orders, showed an order for quetiapine (medication used to treat hallucinations and disordered thoughts) 25 milligram (mg) every 12 hours for dementia (cognitive loss) with agitation with an initiation date of 12/20/2023. There was an order for trazodone (medication for depression that is often used to help sleep) 50 mg at bedtime for sleep with an initiation date of 12/21/2023. Review of the hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], showed Resident 13 was to have quetiapine 25 mg every 12 hours as needed for agitation and trazodone 50 mg tablet- give half tablet (25 mg) at bedtime. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident clinical records were complete and accurate for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 60 and 65) reviewed for advance directives (AD, a resident wishes regarding medical treatment to ensure their wishes are carried out if they are unable to communicate them). The failure to ensure AD documentation was complete and accurate placed the residents at risk for not having their wishes honored. Findings included . <RESIDENT 60> The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 60's Multidisciplinary Care Conference note, dated 01/16/2024, showed the facility documented: - The resident wanted help with getting a Medicare application approved. - The resident did not have an AD. The note documented no information was provided to the resident on their right to formulate an AD, and they documented the resident had not declined information on their right to formulate an AD. The note documented they reviewed a Living Will (an advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice to the resident, resident's representative(s) and representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of an emergency transfer for 5 of 5 resident's (2, 5, 6, 7, and 8) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure did not afford resident and/or their representative to make informed decisions about transfers and prohibited access to an advocate who could inform resident/representative of their options and rights. This failure had the potential to affect all facility-initiated discharges. Findings included . Review of facility policy Transfer & Discharge, revision date 10/15/2022, stated if the facility determines a resident who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the facility, cannot return to the facility, the facility complies with the requirements: a. Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice in writing at the time of a resident transfer to the hospital or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital for 5 of 5 of sampled residents (Resident 2, 5, 6, 7, and 8) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failed practice placed the residents or their representative at risk for lack of knowledge regarding the right to hold their bed while they were at the hospital. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, undated, stated the facility upon transfer will offer residents and/or responsible party the option to hold the bed. The resident and responsible party will be informed of this policy in writing upon admission and discharge or transfer. If unable to provide at the time of transfer or discharge the policy will be provided within 24 hours. <RESIDENT 2> A review of Resident 2's nursing progress notes and admission/discharge history, showed the resident discharged from facility to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for 1 of 3 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Failure to conduct a thorough investigation to identify the root cause(s) and all contributing factors related to Resident 1's incident, placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, risk for injury, and ineffective care planning. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book), dated October 2015, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It includes guidelines for prevention and protection, incident identification, investigation and reporting for nursing homes, the facility investigation should end with the identification of who was involved in the incident, and what, when, where, why, and how the incident happened including the probable or reasonable cause. Review of facility policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights to make choices for frequency of bathing for 4 of 6 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3 and 4) reviewed for choices. Failure to honor resident choices placed these residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated 02/28/2019, showed activities of daily living include the resident's ability to bathe, dress and groom. The policy stated resident's preferences are respected, and reasonable accommodations are made. <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 was a long-term care resident of the facility. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) assessment, dated 07/28/2023, showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact, and felt that it was very important for them to be able to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. Review of Resident 1's current care plan on 08/17/2023, showed a focus problem of Activities of Daily Living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective, resident-centered discharge plan was in place for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3), reviewed for discharge planning. The failure to initiate a discharge plan consistent with the resident's needs and/or the resident representative's expressed discharge goals, placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, decreased self-worth, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer & Discharge, dated 10/15/20222, showed the facility develops and implements an effective discharge planning process focusing on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of the resident to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. Resident 3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a brain bleed (bleeding between the brain tissues and skull or within the brain tissue itself), diabetes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-05-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for screening of potential staff to ensure the protection of residents against abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation by requesting reference checks and/or reviewing information from former employers for 4 of 4 staff (Staff F,G,H, and I ) reviewed for hiring practices. Failure to obtain references or obtain information from former employers placed residents at risk of potential abuse.Findings included.Review of a facility policy titled, Preventing Abuse, revised date 08/01/2023, documented the facility would complete at least two reference checks to obtain information from previous/current employers upon hire as part of the screening process.On 04/27/2026 at 5:56 AM, the facility was sent an email requesting documentation of screening prior to hire which included evidence of reference checks for Staff F, G, H, and I.On 04/27/2026 at 9:37 AM, surveyor received an email with the requested documents, but no reference checks were received for the four staff members.On 04/27/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$195,291 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $19,615 — penalty dated 2026-04-14
  • $142,428 — penalty dated 2024-02-09
  • $33,248 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-09 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Caldwell Care of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 1 of 5Cascadia of BoiseBoise, ID 1 of 5Cherry Ridge of CascadiaEmmett, ID 1 of 5Coeur d Alene Health of CascadiaCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Colfax Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColfax, WA 1 of 5Colville Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColville, WA 1 of 5Curry Village Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBrookings, OR 1 of 5Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 1 of 5Mount Ascension Transitional Care Of CascadiaHelena, MT 1 of 5Orchards of Cascadia, TheNampa, ID 1 of 5Spokane Valley Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadSpokane Valley, WA 1 of 5Teton Healthcare of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 2 of 5Cascadia of NampaNampa, ID 2 of 5Royal Plaza Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaLewiston, ID 2 of 5Salem Transitional CareSalem, OR 2 of 5Secora Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPortland, OR 3 of 5Arbor Valley of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Brookfield Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBattle Ground, WA 3 of 5Clarkston Health And Rehab Of CascadiaClarkston, WA 3 of 5Clearwater Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaOrofino, ID 3 of 5Highland Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 3 of 5Northpark Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPhoenix, AZ 3 of 5Shaw Mountain of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Weiser Care of CascadiaWeiser, ID 4 of 5Canyon West of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 4 of 5Cascadia of LewistonLewiston, ID 4 of 5Cove of Cascadia, TheBellevue, ID 4 of 5Grangeville Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaGrangeville, ID 4 of 5Lewiston Transitional Care of CascadiaLewiston, ID 4 of 5Mountain Valley of CascadiaKellogg, ID 4 of 5Paradise Creek Health and Rehab of CascadiaMoscow, ID 4 of 5Stafholt Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBlaine, WA 4 of 5Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaNampa, ID 5 of 5Alderwood Park Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 5 of 5Aspen Park of CascadiaMoscow, ID 5 of 5Bend Transitional CareBend, OR 5 of 5Boswell Transitional Care Of CascadiaSun City, AZ 5 of 5Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaEugene, OR 5 of 5Fairlawn Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaGresham, OR 5 of 5Hudson Bay Health And RehabilitationVancouver, WA

Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASCADIA WASHINGTON OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
CASCADIA HC GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
CASCADIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/05/2025
HAMMOND, OWENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/08/2021
LAFORTE, STEPHENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
NELSON, TIMOTHYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
SNOHOMISH 800 REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/11/2022
CASCADIA SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025
BHUMKAR, NISHITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
JACKSON, ZACHARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$518K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 12%Other / private 27%

This home reported $518K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$453per resident / day
operating cost
$13,776per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$435per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505338. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next