Spokane Valley Health And Rehabilitation Of Cascad
East 17121 Eighth Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99016 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (509) 924-6161 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,762 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-06)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.5% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.6% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.1% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.7% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.6% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 52.6% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 20.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.3%CMS range 33.8–52.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 20.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.6–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to take action or evaluate the need for action for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2), who experienced significant changes in clinical status. There was a lack of timely interventions, physician notification and adherence to the bowel management program, Resident 1 experienced harm when complaints of stomach pain were not reported or managed, Resident 2 experienced harm when pain and significant weeping edema was not addressed. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy for change of condition, dated 11/28/2017, stated that upon recognition of a potentially life-threatening condition or significant change in status, the nurse should communicate with other health care providers to meet the needs of the resident. Review of a provider notification binder, found at all the nurses' stations within the facility, titled Alert to change in condition, dated 2020, stated early intervention is key! It further stated to call the provider if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, was electronically submitted correctly to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for Quarter 2 of 2025, reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure resulted in CMS receiving inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels and had the potential to impact resident care and services.Findings included. Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report showed the facility reported data for the period of April 1, 2025, through June 30, 2025, at a level lower than the required by mandated staffing levels. In an interview with Staff A, Administrator, and Staff B, Director of Nursing, on 05/22/2026 at 10:09 AM, Staff A confirmed the PBJ data that had been submitted for Quarter 2 was incorrect and collaboration with CMS personnel occurred to correct and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consistent and required provision of Restorative Nursing Programs (RNP, a formal, planned and organized program of care which is intended to restore a lost ability or maintain a potentially deteriorating function for a particular resident), including periodic reviews of the RNP, for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 49, 68, 82, and 88) reviewed for limited range of motion and mobility. These failures placed the residents at risk of development or worsening of contractures (a medical condition where muscle, tendon, or other soft tissue becomes abnormally tight and shortened, limiting the range of motion at a joint) and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of a revised 08/30/2025 facility policy titled Range of Motion showed, the facility would provide range of motion (ROM, the full movement potential of a joint or series of joints) exercises to assist the resident to prevent avoidable decline including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to meet the care needs for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 4, 68, 88) reviewed for activities of daily living for dependent residents, and 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 49, 68, 82, and 88) reviewed for restorative nursing (interventions that promote a resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible). Failure to ensure there was adequate nursing staff available to provide bathing and restorative services placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Council>During a Resident Council meeting on 09/30/2025 at 1:28 PM, attendees were asked if care and assistance was provided timely, without having to wait a long time. All residents in attendance (Residents 18, 20, 24, 5, 35, 41, 11, 6, 47, 75, and 91) stated they often had to wait for assistance because there wasn't enough staff. Resident 24 stated they had even used their cell phone to call the facility in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing/showers for 3 of 6 sampled residents (4, 68, 88) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS). This failure placed the residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and unmet care needs. Findings included .<Resident 4>The 09/19/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 4 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding their care and required assistance from nursing staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLS) such as bathing. On 09/29/2025 at 8:48 AM, Resident 4 was observed in their room. During conversation with the resident, they stated it had been a couple of weeks since they were last bathed, and they did not know why they were not getting bathed. Review of the ADL care plan documented Resident 4 needed assistance to bathe from one nursing staff. Interventions implemented on 03/19/2024 instructed nursing staff to bathe the resident twice a week and as needed, and to provide a bed bath when the resident refused or was unable to tolerate being bathed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully assess and implement orders and interventions, monitored a change in condition for 4 of 9 sampled residents (Residents 7, 24, 6 and 51) whose records were reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of medical complications, discomfort and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 51> Review of Resident 51's medical record showed the resident had a bowel movement (BM) on [DATE], and not again until [DATE], a span of six days with no BM. Review of Resident 51's medical record showed the resident had a BM on [DATE] and not again until [DATE], a span of five days with no BM. Review of Resident 51's medical record showed the resident had a BM on [DATE] and not again until [DATE], a span of six days with no BM. Review of a [DATE] progress note showed Resident 51, is complaining of constipation, looked over B&B (bowel and bladder record) and [they have] not had a BM documented since 9-9 2025 [a span of 11 days].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess a resident's smoking abilities, appropriately care plan, and implement safety interventions as needed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 81), reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.According to the 09/15/2025 admission assessment, Resident 81 had diagnoses of metastatic cancer (cancer that had spread to other parts of the body). Resident 81 was alert and oriented, made their needs known and used a wheelchair for mobility.During observation and interview on 09/25/2025 at 3:38 PM, Resident 81 was in their room with a red lighter in their hand. Resident 81 stated they smoked, but only 4 cigarettes a day and went out to the other side of the road to smoke. When asked what they were informed about smoking at this facility, Resident 81 replied there were no rules about cigarettes.Review of Resident 81's admission documents showed a Smoke Free Campus Acknowledgement. The document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent, ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (a treatment that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to do so) center regarding dialysis care and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 24) reviewed for dialysis. Failure to ensure accurate and complete communication to and from the dialysis center, address dietitian communication, and ensure administration and disposition of medications on dialysis days, placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and dialysis complications.Findings included.Review of an 08/03/2025 quarterly assessment showed Resident 24 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions, including diabetes. The assessment showed Resident 24 was cognitively intact, staff administered insulin, and they received dialysis services.<Communication Before and After Dialysis>Review of an 11/07/2024 care plan in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 2 of 4 medication storage rooms and 2 of 4 medication carts were not maintained in a sanitary manner. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication. Findings included .During an observation of the Berry Way medication room on 09/26/2025 at 10:15 AM, with Staff B, Director of Nursing, there were three bags of Zosyn, an intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication for Resident 78 that had expired on 08/27/2025, Gabapentin liquid, a medication used to treat seizures or pain, for Resident 57 that had expired on 08/28/2025. In an interview on 09/26/2025 at 10:35 AM, Staff B stated the nurse managers and themselves checked the medications monthly to ensure they were not expired. Staff B stated it was important to discard the expired medications to ensure the residents did not receive medication that might not be effective. In an observation on 09/26/2025 at 10:44…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 6 and 17) reviewed for advance directives (a legal document that outlined a resident's wishes for medical treatment if they could not make decisions for themselves) and 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3) reviewed for admission. This failure placed the residents at risk of delay in care, inaccurate medical records, and decreased quality of life. Findings included. Review of facility policy titled, Resident Medical Record revised October 2022, showed each resident medical record was to be maintained complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized.<Resident 6> Review of a 08/20/2025 Care Conference Review showed Resident 6 had an advanced directive and a copy of the healthcare Power of Attorney (POA, a document that appointed a person to make medical decisions on the resident's behalf) was on file. Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene when indicated during 2 of 3 medication administration observations. This failure placed residents at risk for potential unintended health consequences and diminished quality of life.Findings included .In an observation on 09/29/2025 at 7:26 AM, Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse, sanitized their hands and put on gloves. At 7:27 AM, Staff P walked down the hall wearing their gloves, opened a resident's door, and moved their curtains. Wearing the same gloves, Staff P lifted Resident 38's gown, wiped their abdomen with an alcohol swab, and gave them their insulin injection. In an interview on 09/29/2025 at 11:33 AM, Staff P stated they should have removed their gloves and performed hand hygiene after they touched those things, prior to administering the medications, and it was important to do so for infection control. In an observation on 09/29/2025 at 8:53 AM, Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse, was wearing gloves and opened the door to Resident 22's room. Wearing the same gloves, Staff D, moved the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) whose records were reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued abuse or neglect.Findings included.Review of the October 2015 Nursing Home GUIDELINES or the Purple Book showed that the thoroughness of the investigation was a critical component of any investigation. The guidelines showed that for the facility to provide evidence of the thoroughness of the investigation, the information must be recorded. Each phase of a thorough investigation included two steps, data collection (which answered Who? What? and When? of the event) and data analysis (which summarized and analyzed the facts gathered to either establish reasonable cause for the incident or establish the need for further investigation). Within the first 24 hours of the allegation, part of the initial investigation included interviewing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls and associated injuries and injury during transfers or bed mobility for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 and 3) whose records were reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the residents at risk for falls, physical injury, and pain. Findings included.<Resident 1>Review of a 10/03/2025 annual assessment showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions including dementia with anxiety, a stroke, and pain in the right knee. The assessment showed the staff assessed the resident to be cognitively intact, did not reject care, used a wheelchair, and was dependent on the staff for toileting hygiene, bed mobility, transfers and dressing. The assessment showed the staff identified the resident was frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder and not on a toileting program and had one fall since the prior assessment.In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing was maintained to provide consistent and required assistance during bed mobility and use of a mechanical lift (a device that uses mechanical means, like gears, chains, or cables driven by a motor, to raise and lower persons and moving individuals with limited mobility safely) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for accident. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing maintained a license that authorized them to work as a Registered Nurse (RN) in the State of [NAME]. These failures placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included.<Insufficient Staffing> Review of a [DATE] admission assessment showed Resident 3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions, including muscle weakness, difficulty walking and right foot drop (a condition where the muscles that lift the front part of the foot are weakened or paralyzed resulting in an inability to raise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 6), reviewed for medication administration, received medication as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in a pattern of significant medication errors which placed the resident at risk for medical complications, unintended health consequences and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the hospital discharge summary and orders dated 10/10/2024 showed Resident 6 was to receive fluconazole (oral antifungal medication) 600mg (milligrams; a unit of measurement) daily until 10/28/2024. The resident was to be closely monitored by nephrology (medical specialty that focuses on the kidneys) due to their advanced kidney disease. Per the October 2024 Medication Administration Record, Resident 6 received fluconazole 600mg twice daily on 10/11/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/13/2024, 10/14/2024, and 10/15/2024 (double the amount ordered). The resident's record showed they discharged from the facility on 10/15/2024. Review of the October 2024 progress notes showed no entries…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of an incident requiring transfer to the hospital experienced by 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed decisions for treatment by the legal representative. Findings included . Review of the 11/20/2024 annual assessment showed Resident 1 had significant cognitive impairments and was dependent upon staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Per the 11/21/2024 care plan, Resident 1 had a surrogate decision-maker who was to be involved in all medical and financial decision making. Review of the December 2024 progress notes for Resident 1 showed on 12/05/2024 Staff B, Registered Nurse was notified by staff at the front desk that Resident 1 had a fall during an external appointment that day which resulted in low back pain and required a transfer to the hospital for evaluation. The note showed the resident was transferred back to the facility with no new physician orders. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards, received adequate supervision while at an appointment with an external provider. This failure placed the resident at risk of injury and unmet needs. Findings included . Review of the 11/20/2024 annual assessment showed Resident 1 had significant cognitive impairments and was dependent upon staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Per the 11/21/2024 care plan, Resident 1 was at a high risk to fall, had a history of seizures (sudden uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain) and involuntary movements, and was confused. The care plan showed staff were to provide close monitoring of the resident, a specialty wheelchair that tilted back (to prevent falls from leaning forward), and required the assistance of two staff and a mechanical lift for transfers. Review of the December 2024 progress notes for Resident 1 showed on 12/05/2024 Resident 1 had an external appointment that day. Further review of the progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse, was free from sexual abuse from another resident (Resident 2). This failure placed Resident 1 and other residents at risk for psychosocial harm and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 09/09/2024 annual assessment showed Resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired, wandered one to three days of the assessment period, had delusions (false belief about external reality despite evidence to the contrary) and was able to walk with supervision. Review of the care plan initiated 09/06/2023 showed Resident 2 had poor physical boundaries with others and required staff to monitor their behavior. Per the 09/04/2024 quarterly assessment Resident 1 was severely cognitively impaired and independent with walking. Review of a 09/17/2024 facility investigation showed Staff D, Nursing Assistant, was walking down the hallway at approximately 2:45 PM that day and found Resident 2 in Resident 1's room. Per the report, Resident 1 was lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information was accurate upon submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Quarter 1 of 2024 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure caused CMS to have inaccurate data related to facility staffing levels and had the potential to impact resident care and services. Findings included . Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) PBJ Staffing Data Report showed the facility reported data for Quarter 1, 2024 at a level lower than required by mandated staffing levels. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 3:15 PM Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated the facility was having a lot of change during Quarter 1, 2024 and they did not think hours were being reported correctly. On 11/14/2024 at 8:10 PM Staff A, Operations Director, documented the facility had additional staffing data from Quarter 1, 2024 that was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable food for 6 of 7 sampled residents (48, 59, 8, 41, 1, 43) reviewed for food. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased nutritional intake, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to [NAME] Administrative Code [PHONE NUMBER]0, Time/temperature control for safety food, hot and cold holding (FDA Food Code 3-501.16). Food must be maintained: At 135°F (57°C) or above, or at 41°F (5°C) or less. Resident Observations and Interviews <Resident 48> On 08/01/2024 at 2:41 PM, Resident 48 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room using their computer. When asked about the food, the resident stated the food was horrible, did not have much taste, and was not something they would eat if they had a choice. On 08/06/2024 at 8:29 AM, Resident 48 stated breakfast was good, had eggs, toast, oatmeal, and coffee, but there was no meat. Resident 48 further stated the meals often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms) were implemented when indicated for 4 of 4 sampled residents (69, 7, 73, 1) reviewed, and that hand hygiene was completed when indicated during 1 medication pass observed and 2 wound treatments observed. Additionally, the water management plan was not developed and implemented as required, Infection Prevention Program policies and procedures were not reviewed annually, and appropriate follow-up measures were not completed timely when one resident screened for Tuberculosis exposure (TB, a bacterical infection that mainly affected the lungs) had a positive skin test. These failures placed residents at risk for cross contamination of infectious material, and possible exposure or illness from debilitating bacterial and viral illnesses. The article, Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided education regarding the risks and benefits of influenza and pneumococcal immunizations, and received the immunizations or did not receive them due to contraindications or refusals for 4 of 5 sampled residents (36, 48, 66, 69) reviewed. This failure put residents at risk of being unable to participate in aspects of their care, and at risk of acquiring viral and bacterial diseases. Findings included . The 03/04/2022 revised Influenza Program facility policy documented residents and family members received education regarding the benefits of the influenza immunization. Residents were offered and given the vaccine unless it was contraindicated, they had already received it during the current flu season, or the resident refused it. The 05/31/2023 revised Pneumococcal Program facility policy documented residents and family members received education regarding the benefits of pneumococcal immunization. Residents were offered and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records included evidence of the resident's vaccination status for COVID-19 (a viral illness that caused difficulty breathing, fever, or other severe symptoms that included possible death), that the residents had been offered education regarding the risks or potential side effects of the vaccine, had been offered the vaccine if available, refusals, contraindications, or administrations if given, for 4 of 5 sampled residents (36, 48, 66, 69) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their choices to receive immunizations, and at risk for acquiring serious viral illnesses. Findings included . The 07/03/2024 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines retrieved 08/14/2024 from cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html documented everyone aged 5 years and older should get 1 dose of an updated COVID-19 vaccine to protect against serious illness. People who are up to date with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care in a dignified manner for 3 of 4 sampled residents (4, 58, 67) reviewed for resident rights. Specifically, Resident 4 was referred to as a feeder, and Residents 58 and 67 required use of urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder that allowed urine to drain) and the urine collection bags were not covered and were visible to the public. This failure put the residents at risk for embarassment and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 4> A 06/04/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 4 had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury (TBI), and spastic hemiplegia (muscles on one side of the body are in a constant state of contraction) affecting their left dominant side. Resident 4 was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs). The comprehensive care plan documented Resident 4 was at nutritional risk and required adaptive equipment at meals. Staff were instructed to provide feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate a fall for 1 of 3 sampled residents (285), reviewed for falls. This failure placed the resident at risk of further falls, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 05/17/2021 facility policy titled, Fall Response and Management documented nursing staff was to complete a post fall investigation, notify the physician, and communicate the event and intervention changes to the staff. According to the 08/04/2024 admission assessment, Resident 285 required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living such as transferring and toileting and was able to make their needs known. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 8:44 AM, Resident 285's family member stated the resident had fallen on 08/02/2024 when staff had assisted him to the toilet. The family member stated the resident was standing in the bathroom, fell back and hit their hip on the toilet and experienced a lot of pain and was not getting any better. During an interview on 08/08/2024 at 8:38 PM, Staff D, Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (23) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, an assessment completed to determine whether a resident with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness needed specialized mental health services) was completed accurately and prior to admission as required. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a new PASARR assessment was completed when Resident 23 had changes in their mental health diagnoses. These failures placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 23> Resident 23's admission record documented the resident admitted to the facility with a mental health diagnosis of paranoid personality disorder, a mental health disorder characterized by irrational and persistent beliefs that people were trying to harm, deceive or exploit them. Review of Resident 23's record showed a PASARR was completed by Staff G, Social Worker, on 06/26/2023, four days after the resident was admitted to the facility. Section 1A of the assessment documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 3 of 19 sampled residents (1, 283, 4) reviewed for care planning. Failure to ensure nutritional interventions for Residents 1 and 4, and vascular ulcer interventions for 283 were followed placed the residents at risk for poor nutritional intake, potential skin breakdown, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> The 07/08/2024 annual assessment documented Resident 1 was able to make their needs known to staff, had impaired range of motion to an upper extremity on one side of their body, and needed set up or clean up assistance from nursing staff to eat. On 08/01/2024 at 10:15 AM, Resident 1 was observed lying in their bed in their room talking with their representative. The representative stated Resident 1 was at risk for choking, would put too much food on the spoon when eating and the staff were supposed to supervise for safety, but it wasn't being done. In response to the comment, Resident 1 made a thumbs up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary, including a recapitulation of the resident's stay as required, for 1 of 1 sampled residents (19), reviewed for discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk for having an incomplete medical record. Findings included . The 07/08/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 19 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding care and needed set up assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living. A record review documented Resident 19 was admitted to the facility for physical and occupational therapy, following a urinary tract infection and sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection). A review of the progress note on 07/30/2024 documented Resident 19 was discharged to another facility. The 07/30/2024 discharge summary completed by Staff F, Physician Assistant, documented the resident discharged but did not state where to, nor did the summary provide a recapitulation of the care and services the resident received while at the facility. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing and/or grooming for 3 of 3 sampled residents (1, 43, 5), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS). This failure placed the residents at risk for poor personal hygiene, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> The 07/08/2024 annual assessment documented Resident 1 had diagnoses which included paraplegia, a condition that caused the loss of muscle function in the lower half of the body. In addition, the assessment documented the resident was dependent on nursing staff to complete activities of daily living for bathing and personal hygiene such as shaving. On 08/01/2024 from 9:37 AM to 9:50 AM, Resident 1 was observed lying in bed in their room. The resident's hair was greasy in appearance and there was long facial stubble present. When asked if they were being bathed, and assisted to shave, the resident stated no, and made a thumbs down gesture. Resident 1's representative was present at the time and stated it had been about three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled residents (25) reviewed for activities, received an ongoing program of activities that met their interests. This failure placed the resident at risk for boredom and diminished quality of life. Findings included Per the 06/24/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 25 was moderately cognitively impaired, was able to make some needs known, and had diagnoses which included dementia and depression. The assessment documented it was very important to the resident to be involved in activities that included: books, music, animals, religion, spending time outdoors, doing things with groups of people and participating in their favorite activities. Per the 03/22/2023 care plan, Resident 25 was at risk for activity deficits related to cognitive and physical deficits, difficulty with balance and memory, required encouragement to participate due to difficulty initiating stimulation and socialization. The goal for the resident was to participate in varied group and individual activities such as church…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were implemented for 1 of 4 sampled residents (4) reviewed. Specifically, Resident 4 did not have their pressure relieving foam boot applied consistently when in bed and an area where the resident had a history of pressure on their left heel reopened. This failure placed the resident at risk of further deterioration of their heel, pain, infection, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 4> A review of the record showed Resident 4 had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury (TBI), hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the left dominant side of the body, and Stage 3 pressure ulcer of the left heel, (full thickness loss of skin without exposure of muscle, tendon, or bone). The 06/04/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 4 was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs) including rolling from side to side, personal hygiene and toileting. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent, ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (65), reviewed for dialysis. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and medical complications. Findings included . The 06/27/2024 admission assessment documented Resident 65 was able to make decisions regarding their cares, and had diagnoses which included kidney disease, and diabetes (a disease caused by the inability of the body to convert the food we eat into sugar needed for the cells to use as energy). In addition, the assessment documented the resident received dialysis (a procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stopped working properly). Review of the 01/25/2024 agreement between the facility and the dialysis center documented care of residents receiving dialysis was to be coordinated between the facility and the dialysis center, to ensure continuity of care and the resident's well-being. Per the 06/28/2024 dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by the physician within the required timeframes for 2 of 8 sampled residents (5, 59) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet medical needs and decreased quality of care. Findings included . <Resident 59> The 07/12/2024 annual assessment documented Resident 59 was able to make decisions regarding their care and had diagnoses which included kidney disease. On 08/01/2024 at 12:23 PM, Resident 59 was observed sitting upright in bed. When asked if they had any concerns about their care, Resident 59 stated there was a new team of doctors at the facility and they had asked to see one, but it hadn't happened. Resident 59 further stated they had chronic urinary tract infections, had just finished antibiotics, and would like to speak to the doctor. Review of Resident 59's record found documentation that showed Staff R, Physician's Assistant, visited the resident on 06/18/2024, 07/03/2024, 07/09/2024, 07/15/2024, 07/25/2024, and 08/06/2024. A provider progress note on 06/12/2024 by Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a yearly performance review on 3 of 3 sampled nursing assistants (AA, BB, CC) as required. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained staff. Findings included . Review of the following Nursing Assistant (NA) personnel files found the following: - Staff AA was hired on 05/03/2022. No documentation was found to show an annual performance evaluation had been completed as required. - Staff BB was hired on 07/01/2023. No documentation was found to show an annual performance evaluation had been completed as required. - Staff CC was hired 07/13/2023. No documentation was found to show an annual performance evaluation had been completed as required. In an email correspondence on 08/12/2024 at 6:34 AM, a request for the annual performance reviews for the above nursing assistants was sent to Staff B, Director of Nursing. On 08/13/2024 at 8:18 AM, Staff B replied that no annual performance reviews had been completed. Reference (WAC): 388-97-1680(2)(b)
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health services were provided for 2 of 2 sampled residents (7, 36) reviewed. This failure placed the residents at risk of declining mental health, escalation of their chronic mental health conditions and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 7> A review of the record showed Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including psychosis (disconnection from reality), schizoaffective bipolar disorder (a complex mental health condition that has symptoms of both Schizophrenia and mood disturbances) and catatonic disorder (inability to move normally). The [DATE] quarterly assessment documented Resident 7 was severely cognitively impaired, had hallucinations and physical behavioral symptoms such as hitting and kicking, and also rejected care. Resident 7 was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs), took antipsychotic medication daily, and had not had a gradual dose reduction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Five medication errors were identified for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 73) observed during 40 medication opportunities, which resulted in an error rate of 12.5 percent. The failure to administer medications correctly placed the residents at risk for receiving subtherapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: During an observation on 08/12/2024 at 7:40 AM Staff E, Licsensed Practical Nurse prepared and administered multiple medications to Resident 73 which included one tablet of Mesalamine (a medication for Ulcerative Colitis, a bowel disease that causes swelling and sores in the colon and rectum), and two sprays of Azelastine (a medication for allergies) nasal spray in each nostril, but did not include Acetylcysteine (a medication for anxiety), Spiriva Respimat (a medication to improve breathing), and Ipratropium-Albuterol (a medication to improve breathing). Per review of the current physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of and multi-dose vials were dated when opened in 1 of 2 medication rooms inspected, and that insulin needles were securely stored on a unit that was closed. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving expired medications and potential needlestick injuries. Findings Included . On 08/01/2024 at 8:30 AM, a team of surveyors entered the facility to conduct a recertification survey. The team was provided a workspace in a dining area on a rehabilitation unit that was no longer in use. Across the hall from the dining area, a nursing station no longer in use was located, and contained a small dorm-style refrigerator, a sink area, and multiple unlocked cabinets, and drawers. At 11:01 AM, the nursing station was inspected. Inside a middle unlocked long cabinet on an upper shelf, there were 2 boxes of insulin needles, each 2/3 full. One box of needles expired on 07/31/2024. The second box of needles had an expiration date of 01/31/2025. In an adjacent cabinet on the middle shelf, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the required qualifications (current Food Worker Cards) for one of twelve dietary staff reviewed (EE). This failed practice had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed all residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Findings included . A review of the dietary cards showed no Washington State Food Workers card for Staff EE (hire date 6/21/2024). Staff EE did have a certificate dated 7/4/2024 from Food Handler Solutions for completing the food handler's course. Review of Food Handler Solutions website, foodhandlersolutions.com/[NAME]-food-handler-card/ showed, the Food Handler Solutions Program is currently not approved in the state of [NAME]. This program is only intended to be used for personal development and preparation for the state provided training. A review of the staffing schedules documented Staff EE had worked in the kitchen August 1st-4th 6:00AM-2:30PM, and August 7th-11th…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed when indicated during 1 of 4 meals observed during dining. This failure resulted in potential risk of food borne illness and a decreased quality of life for all residents. Findings included . On 08/01/2024 at 11:59 AM, Staff JJ, Nursing Assistant was observed pushing a resident in a wheelchair into the Dayspring dining room. Staff JJ then proceeded, without performing hand hygiene, to deliver a meal tray to a second resident, cut the resident's sandwich, and refill the coffee cup. Staff JJ continued, without performing hand hygiene, to take a meal tray for a third resident and unwrap the food items, pour water into a cup, place the eating utensils on the tray, and deliver the meal tray to the resident in the dining room. Then again, without performing hand hygiene, Staff JJ prepared a meal tray for a fourth resident by cutting up the food, opening items, opening straws and putting them in the drinks, then delivered the meal to the resident in the dining room. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for medication management. The failure to ensure medications were acquired and administered as ordered, and follow facility processes for medications not available, placed residents at risk for adverse events related to missed medications. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the 07/01/2024 admission assessment showed Resident 1 had a diagnosis of anemia (deficiency of healthy red blood cells that can cause fatigue and unexplained weakness) and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of a provider progress note dated 07/09/2024 showed Resident 1's representative reported the resident's nephrologist (doctor who specializes in kidney care) recommended continuing an anemia treatment the resident had been receiving prior to admission to the facility; Procrit injections. The note documented the resident's family would provide the medication given the cost. In a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed when discontinuing medications for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for medication management. This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving correct medications, adverse health effects, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per the Washington State Board of Nursing (https://nursing.wa.gov/faq/can-registered-nurse-be-delegated-enter-medication-prescriptions-electronic-health-system-or-call; retrieved 07/31/2024) a registered nurse may enter medication prescriptions into an electronic health system under the direction of an authorized health care practitioner. Review of the 07/03/2024 hospital transfer orders for Resident 3 showed a medical provider at the hospital ordered the medication tizanidine (a muscle relaxant) daily at night and L-Lysine (an over-the-counter supplement) daily. Review of Resident 3's July 2024 MAR showed the tizanidine was not provided to the resident from 07/03/2024 through 07/07/2024. Per the MAR the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place in which residents' records were complete and accurate for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. The facility failed to ensure the medical record included consultant provider notes and medications administered during external provider visits. This failure to not maintain complete and accurate medical records placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 showed an order for Procrit (injectable medication that stimulates red blood cell production for anemia treatment) once daily every 14 days, beginning on 07/11/2024. Per the MAR, the resident was not receiving the medication. (See F-755 Pharmacy Services for additional information.) Review of the July 2024 progress notes showed a 07/09/2024 provider progress note documenting that Resident 1's family would provide the Procrit. There were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for food and nutrition services, was served the appropriate diet texture to prevent choking hazards. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for decreased nutritional intake, serious injury, and dimished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the annual assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident had diagnoses of dementia, stroke, aspiration (inhalation of foreign material into the respiratory tract), and received a mechanically altered diet (modification to the texture of food secondary to a physician order). Review of a 06/07/2024 facility investigation showed Resident 1 was coughing/gagging on their meal and required staff to provide suctioning to clear their airway. Per the investigation report, the resident was served a fish sandwich, tater tots and coleslaw, but had only consumed the tater tots at the time of the incident. Review of the electronic physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) in accordance with national standards for effective CPR to one of two sampled residents (Resident 2), reviewed for death. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled facility staff (Staff B and D), reviewed for CPR certification, had current CPR certification credentials. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving effective care in accordance with their decision-making if their heart stopped beating or their breathing stopped. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of the facility policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, updated [DATE], showed residents with a designated CPR status of Full Code would receive CPR and all basic life support therapies in accordance with the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. Facility staff would call emergency medical services (EMS) and obtain the emergency cart. Per the policy, the facility would set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. During observation of medication pass, there were two errors observed out of 25 opportunities, resulting in an 8% error rate. This had the potential to place two sample residents (12, 42) at risk of not receiving the full benefit of their medication therapy. Findings included . Review of facility policy titled, Medication: Administration Including Scheduling and Medication Aides, revised 07/01/2022, read in pertinent part, Medications are administered to the resident according to the Six Right. All employees passing medications are familiar with the action and adverse reactions of medications. Procedure: .Review the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for medications due, follow the Six Right: right medication, right dose, right resident, right route, right time, and right documentation, and perform three checks: read the label on the medication container and compare with the MAR when removing the container from the supply drawer, when placing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label a medication box for one of four sampled residents (42), observed during a medication pass. This failure placed the resident at risk of receiving an inaccurate dosage of medication. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that there were no expired medications in one of the two medication rooms. Findings included . Review of facility policy titled, Medication: Disposition, revised 07/01/2022, read in pertinent part, To ensure accurate disposal of medications. Connect with your pharmacy consultant to be certain of state-specific regulations for approved methods of destruction. Disposal of any medication will be carried out under local, state and federal guidelines or in consultation of the pharmacist in the appropriate disposal procedure. Review of Resident 42's Order Summary Report dated 04/06/2023 showed Voltaren External Gel 1%, apply to bilateral knees topically two times a day (BID) for pain related to pain in right and left knees, apply four grams per knee before lidocaine patch [a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 of 5 sampled residents (22, 29, 42), reviewed for food palatability. This failure placed residents at risk for decreased food consumption and decreased enjoyment of their meals. Findings included . The 04/03/2023 Food Preparation-Food and Nutrition facility policy showed that food preparation was timed to ensure that cold foods were served below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and hot foods were served above 135 degrees F. On 04/04/2023, the lunch meal service was observed on Morningside Unit with the following times: -At 11:52 AM, the cart of trays arrived on the unit. Three staff were observed preparing trays and drinks. -At 11:57 AM, the first meal tray was delivered to a resident. -At 12:23 PM, five trays were still in the cart waiting to be delivered. One staff member was standing at a separate small cart sorting meal preference place cards. The doors to the main food cart remained open the duration of the service. -At 12:32 PM, the last tray on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing/showers for two of four sampled residents (52, 25) in a total sample of 18, who required extensive assistance from two staff to complete their activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed the residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the 11/29/2022 facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, showed, .Any resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Resident 52 Review of Resident 52's electronic admission Record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, dementia, and respiratory failure. Review of the 01/10/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) - a mandatory standardized, comprehensive assessment of each individual resident - showed Resident 52 had a Brief Interview of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a program of meaningful activities in accordance with the resident's preferences and current cognitive ability, as identified in the resident assessment, for one of two sampled residents (52), reviewed for activities, in a total sample of 18. This failure placed the resident at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Guidelines Using Activities As Behaviors Interventions, Special Care Unit-Rehab/Skilled, dated 01/09/2023 showed, .Individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care that are provided as part of a supportive physical and psychosocial environment, directed toward understanding, preventing, relieving, and/or accommodating a resident's distress or loss of abilities, as well as maintaining or improving a resident's mental, physical, or psychosocial well-being . Review of the electronic admission Record showed Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician orders for parameters set before administering medication for 2 of 5 sampled residents (17, 49), reviewed for medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects and unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 17 Review of facility policy titled, Medication: Administration Including Scheduling and Medication Aides, revised 07/01/2022, read (in part), Medications are administered to the resident according to the Six Rights. All employees passing medications are familiar with the action and adverse reactions of medications. Procedure: .Review the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for medications due, follow the Six Rights: right medication, right dose, right resident, right route, right time, and right documentation, and perform three checks: read the label on the medication container and compare with the MAR when removing the container from the supply drawer, when placing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent weight loss and impaired nutritional needs for one of two sampled residents (22), reviewed for nutrition and weight loss in a total sample of 18. This deficient practice caused Resident 22 to have a 7.5% weight loss in a three-month time frame. The facility failed to add additional interventions, failed to notify the provider in a timely manner of the weight loss, and consistently provide fluids as directed on the care plan at meals. These failures placed Resident 22 at risk for additional weight loss and impaired nutrition. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Impaired Nutritional Status and Nutritional Risk, dated 03/30/2023 showed the facility .Ensures that each resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status such as body weight, fluid and electrolyte balance, and hydration status unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that orders for as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications (a type of medication used to treat symptoms of psychosis) were limited to 14 days for 2 of 4 sampled residents (11, 20), reviewed for Hospice (care for a terminal illness) services. In addition, the prescribing practioner had not re-evaluated Resident 11 for the appropriateness of the PRN antipsychotic medication, as required. These failures placed the residents at risk for unintended medication side effects and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 11 A review of records showed Resident 11 had diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, fusion of the cervical spine (backbone), and a benign meningioma (non-cancerous tumor in the brain). A significant change assessment completed on 02/07/2023 showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, hallucinations (perceiving things that aren't really there), and delusions (a false belief that persists in spite of evidence to the contrary). The assessment also showed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,762 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
- $18,233 — penalty dated 2023-10-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.9 | -2.9 vs chain |
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASCADIA WASHINGTON OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2023 |
| CASCADIA HC GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/05/2025 |
| CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2023 |
| CASCADIA HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/05/2025 |
| HAMMOND, OWEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2023 |
| LAFORTE, STEPHEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/05/2025 |
| NELSON, TIMOTHY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/05/2025 |
| SPOKANE VALLEY 17121 REALTY, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/05/2025 |
| WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 08/11/2022 |
| CASCADIA SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/12/2025 |
| BARRETT, JORDAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| MEZA, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/12/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $242K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505099. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.