Clarkston Health And Rehab Of Cascadia
1242 Eleventh Street, Clarkston, WA 99403 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (509) 758-2523 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $32,711 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.1% | 14.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 29.1% | 17.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 2.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.0% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.8% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.8% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.6% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.3% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.65 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 1.52 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 78.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.1%CMS range 38.5–52.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.4–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 78.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 74.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 80.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.6–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure anticoagulant (AC) medication (medication that stops blood from clotting) side effects were consistently monitored for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 5 and 6), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure caused Resident 1 re-hospitalization and treatment to reverse blood thinning and placed additional residents at risk of experiencing medication side-effects and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the 07/31/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 1 was severely cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis of irregular heart rhythm for which they took an AC medication. Review of the July 2023 and August 2023 Medication Administration Records (MARs) showed Resident 1 took Apixaban (an AC medication) twice daily from 07/26/2023 to 08/16/2023. The MARs and associated monitors did not show any documentation of monitoring for complications of AC use. In an interview on 08/31/2023 at 2:09…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document pain levels and administer pain medication timely as ordered/needed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (267), reviewed for pain. These failures caused actual harm to the resident, who experienced inadequate pain control and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . An admission assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 267 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including fracture of right tibia and fibula (bones in the lower leg) requiring surgical repair, and diabetes. A pain assessment completed by a registered nurse on 10/18/2022 showed the resident had verbally reported frequent significant pain at a level of 7 on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 meaning no pain, and 10 the worst pain a person could experience), which was rated on a pain severity scale. The assessment also showed the resident's acceptable level of pain was 5. The same assessment showed the pain the resident was experiencing interfered with their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-18 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post survey results in a place readily accessible and frequented by most residents, as required. This failure placed residents at risk of being unable to exercise their resident rights.Findings included .During observation on 08/11/2025 at 4:45 AM, the facility's main lobby was entered. The lobby was a small foyer and contained a reception desk to the right with a few chairs. Within of few feet of walking into the building an elevator was observed straight ahead, to the left of the elevator was a set of stairs that led downstairs to the first floor that contained resident rooms, to the left of that was a set of stairs that led upstairs to the second floor that contained resident rooms, and a binder that contained survey results was posted on the wall at the base of the stairs that led to the second floor. In an interview on 08/13/2025 at 10:06 AM, the Resident Council was asked without having to ask, are the results of our inspections available for you to read? Only one of 16 residents in attendance voiced knowing the survey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 17 and 42) reviewed and 1 of 1 meal test trays sampled. This failure put residents at risk of decreased enjoyment of their meals, and possible reduced dietary intake. Findings included . According to the Washington State Food Handlers Guide Website, the Washington State Department of Health Safety and Licensing Division recommended that all potentially hazardous foods be held at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below in commercial refrigerators and freezers. This included meats, fish, poultry, eggs, dairy products, cooked vegetables, cooked rice and pasta, cut melons, and other perishable items. All frozen foods were to be stored at 0 degrees F or below. Hot food items were to be held at a temperature of 140 degrees F or above. <Resident 17> The 08/06/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 17 had diagnoses which included a stroke,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food was not labeled, dated or discarded when expired for 5 of 5 refrigerators, and 1 of 1 dry storage areas. The facility failed to perform hand hygiene when indicated during the meal service and to maintain a clean cooking environment. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses.Findings included . <Expired/undated food>During an initial tour of the kitchen on 08/11/2025 at 5:38 AM, the dry storage area revealed a container of Frank's red-hot sauce that expired on 10/26/2023. An observation of the large walk in refrigerator on 08/11/2025 at 5:50 AM revealed 11 boxes of Thick and Easy (a powdered substance used to thicken liquids) that expired on 05/30/2025, a box of apples that contained two brown moldy apples, three bags of wilted spinach that was wet and soggy, two bags of brown wilted lettuce, and two bags of brown wilted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, an assessment completed prior to admission into a skilled nursing facility to determine whether a resident with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness needed specialized mental health services) was accurately completed prior to admission, and if indicated, a referral for a PASARR Level II (a more in-depth screening assessment) was made for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 1, 24, and 70), reviewed for PASARR. Specifically, Resident 1 and 24's PASSAR Level I was inaccurately completed prior to admission. In addition, Resident 1 admitted to the facility with an exempted hospital stay and should have been referred for a Level II evaluation after they remained in the facility for more than 30 days. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified care needs related to their mental health and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 81, 5, 22 and 9) whose care plans were reviewed for pressure ulcers, restorative nursing programs, dental care, and advanced directives. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident 42 and/or their representative were offered the opportunity to participate in care planning. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Advanced Directives> <Resident 81> Review of a 07/16/2025 quarterly assessment showed Resident 81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke with right-sided hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis on one side of the body). The assessment showed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of a 08/03/2022 POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, a written medical order from a provider that helps give people more control over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it implemented its protocol for the management of constipation for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 70 and 83) whose records were reviewed for constipation and to ensure physician orders were in place for specific medication dose administration (Resident 22) and wound dressings (Resident 81). These failures placed the residents at risk for medication errors, deterioration of non-pressure skin conditions, and constipation-associated complications, like fecal impaction (where hardened, dry stool accumulates in the colon or rectum, blocking the passage of waste). Findings included . <Resident 81> Review of a 07/16/2025 quarterly assessment showed Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], the primary reason for admission was a stroke, and had moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment also showed the resident had no ulcers, wounds or skin problems, to include skin tears (a wound that occurred when the top layers of the skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-18 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to repeatedly ensure registered nursing assistants (NAR) obtained their nursing assistant certification (NAC) within 120 days of hire and had the required paperwork on file to include a certification of completion of NAC program or Department of Health (DOH) authorization to test, passed skills test score sheet e-mail from Washington State Board of Nursing (WABON), passed online written test sheet from Credentia (a company that provided oversight and scheduling services for nurse aide certification exams), and the completed NAR certification application attestation form to continue to work beyond the 120-day deadline, as required for 6 of 6 sampled staff (Staff K, L, M, N, O, and P), reviewed for staffing. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or under-qualified care staff, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Staff K>Review of the facility employee list provided by the facility on 08/11/2025 showed Staff K, NAR, was hired on 09/20/2024. Review of Staff K's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for 6 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 1, 5, 8, 9, 22 and 86) whose medical records were reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident 8 and 5's care conference documents (to include a complete resident identifier for Resident 5), Resident 5's visit summaries from a dental appointment, Resident 9's Psychosocial History Document (to include a complete resident identifier), Resident 22's clinic and lab results from a community provider appointment, Resident 1's smoking assessment, and Resident 86's bed hold notice were present and easily accessible in their medical records. These failures placed the residents at risk for a delay in care or services. Findings included. <Resident 5> In an interview on 08/11/2025 at 8:38 AM, Resident 5 stated they did not get invited to care planning conferences, That stopped. Review of Resident 5's electronic medical record from 01/2025 to 08/2025 showed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff- to-resident rough handling was reported to the Administrator or designee and to the State Agency (SA) within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 81) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the resident and other residents at risk for potential physical abuse and precluded the SA from being aware of and investigating the circumstances surrounding the resident's allegation.Findings included. Review of a revised 08/01/2023 facility policy titled Identification and Investigation of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, and Injuries of Unknown Origin showed the facility identified incidents and occurrences that could constitute or contribute to abuse and neglect by reviewing grievances and complaints, and reports of allegations of abuse or neglect, injuries of unknown origin, or other evidence of physical, verbal, sexual or psychological abuse. The policy showed the staff notified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the appropriate minimum information to include contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative contact information, advanced directive information, comprehensive care plan goals, any special instructions and/or precautions for ongoing care, and all other necessary information was communicated to hospital at time of transfer, as required for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 86) whose closed records were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of potential delays in emergent hospital treatment, potential medical complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.According to the 07/19/2025 Medicare five-day assessment, Resident 86 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia (not enough blood cells) and gastritis (inflammation of the stomach lining) with bleeding. Resident 86 was cognitively intact and able to clearly verbalize their needs.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for smoking. This failure placed residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans revised October 2024, showed a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented consistent with the resident's specific conditions, risks, needs, behaviors, and preferences within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment. According to the 06/21/2025 admission assessment, Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (inability to effectively exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide). Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the periodic review and monitoring of splint and/or brace wear and effectively address refusals of the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 22 and 81) reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM, the full movement potential of a joint or series of joints). These failures placed the resident at risk of worsening contractures (a medical condition where muscle, tendon, or other soft tissue becomes abnormally tight and shortened, limiting the ROM at a joint) and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of a revised 01/20/2025 facility policy titled Restorative Nursing showed that RNPs, to include splint or brace (a custom or prefabricated device that provided support, immobilized or assisted movement in the hand, wrist, or fingers to heal injuries, correct deformities, prevent stiffness, or manage contractures) assistance programs, required measurable objectives and interventions that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate care and services to minimize the risk of associated urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 8), reviewed for catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care. This failure placed the resident at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included. Per the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice 10th Ed. ([NAME], 2014), infectious organisms can move into the bladder along the outside of any urinary catheter, and the catheter bag (a urine collection bag attached to the catheter) should be kept off the floor (and other unclean surfaces), to prevent bacteria from entering the bladder (pg. 781-782). The 07/02/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 8 had diagnoses which included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, prostate gland enlargement that blocks the flow of urine out of the bladder), obstructive uropathy (a urinary tract disorder that occurs when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given their medications as ordered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 70) reviewed for medication management. This failure placed residents at risk of exacerbations of their chronic health conditions, and unintended consequences when doses of their medications were omitted. Findings included . The 07/09/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 70 had diagnoses which included arthritis, migraines and a neck fracture, and had severe cognitive impairments. The 04/06/2023 care plan documented Resident 70 was at risk for pain. Staff were instructed to give medications as ordered. A review of the August 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented medication orders and omissions:-Pregabalin 150 milligrams (mg) three times a day for neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage). The entry on 08/10/2025 and 08/11/2025 said the medication was not available. There was a progress note on 03/11/2025 that stated the medication was reordered. -Humalog insulin inject…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it coordinated follow-up appointments with the denturist (a person who made dentures) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 5) reviewed for dental needs. This failure placed Resident 5 at risk of discomfort or pain from ill-fitting dentures, weight loss and decreased self-esteem. Findings included. Review of an 08/13/2025 annual assessment showed Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions and was cognitively intact. This assessment showed the resident had no natural teeth or tooth fragments or abnormal mouth tissue. A care area assessment worksheet associated with the 08/13/2025 annual assessment showed Resident 5 was, having a sore on gum line that is being treated/monitored. Resident is at risk for weight changes and chewing problems. The note also showed, dental appointments as ordered or requested PRN [as needed]. In an interview and observation on 08/11/2025 at 8:45 AM, Resident 5 said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene when indicated during 2 of 3 medication administration observations. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, use of personal protective equipment such as disposable gowns and gloves when providing high contact types of care for residents with drains, tubes, or colonized with antibiotic resistant bacteria) were implemented and followed when indicated or ensure PPE was readily available for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 6), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed residents at risk for potential unintended health consequences, the potential spread of infectious diseases or organisms resistant to antibiotics, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.According to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- gloves, disposable gowns, eye protection or masks) Use in Nursing Homes to prevent Spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use of an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube which drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag) was properly monitored to ensure it was functioning for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 & 3), reviewed for urinary catheters. This failure placed the residents at risk for complications, prolonged therapy, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a facility's policy titled, Indwelling Catheters, revised 04/12/2022, showed if an indwelling catheter was in use, the facility provided appropriate care for the catheter in accordance with current professional standards of practice and staff were to monitor for changes in condition related to potential catheter-associated urinary tract infections. <Resident 1> Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses to include neurogenic bladder (a lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1), reviewed for medication administration, received medications appropriately, in accordance with the physician's order. This failure resulted in a pattern of significant medication errors which placed the resident at risk for medical decline, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Errors, revised 08/01/2024, showed a medication error occurred when a medication was not administered in accordance with the prescriber's orders. Review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 1 had an order for a narcotic pain medication, hydrocodone-acetaminophen, to be given every 6 hours as needed. The resident could take 1 tablet for mild to moderate pain and 2 tablets for moderate to severe pain. The order included instructions not to administer more than four tablets every 24 hours. Further review showed the resident was administered more than 4 tablets on 15 occasions: 09/07/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect Prohibition Policies and Procedures to include, not reporting allegations of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within the required timeframe and completing thorough investigations for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse/misappropriation. This failure placed the resident and other residents at risk for abuse/misappropriation. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Identification and Investigation of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, and Injuries of Unknown Origin, revised 08/01/2023, showed staff were to report any form of alleged abuse to the SA immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if abuse was alleged and there was serious bodily injury. All other allegations were to be reported within 24 hours. Additionally, the facility would investigate the allegation and document evidence of the investigation. Review of the September and October 2024 facility incident logs showed no reported incidents for Resident 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the Resident Representative (RR) of changes to the resident's weight, treatments, wound status, medication changes, refusals of treatments, and changes in condition for one (1) of 4 residents reviewed for the right to be informed of care for a span of five months. This failure precluded the RR from the opportunity to contribute to help Resident 1 make an informed decision related to medication and treatment changes and move forward with the treatment options being proposed. Findings included . Review of an 11/28/2017 facility policy titled Resident Change in Condition, described a change in condition as a change from the resident's normal status or whenever there was a change in the resident's medical condition. Some of the examples of a change in condition included, new or increasing confusion, newly identified incontinence, weight loss of more than 5 % (percent) of body weight, behavior changes, and potentially life-threatening conditions due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for dental services received adequate pain management and timely dental services for an impacted wisdom tooth and abscess. This failure placed residents at increased risk of pain, unmet dental needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of an 11/28/2017 facility policy titled Dental Services showed the facility provided the assistance needed or requested to obtain dental services and if a referral did not occur within 3 business days, the facility would ensure the resident would drink and eat adequately while awaiting dental services. The policy defined emergency dental services as services needed to treat an episode of acute pain in teeth, gums, or palate, broken or otherwise damaged teeth, or any other problem of the oral cavity that required immediate attention by a dentist. <Resident 1> Review of a 09/17/2024 assessment showed Resident 1 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to monitor the temperature of food being served, failed to ensure a resident's meal tray (9) was discarded timely, and failed to prepare food in a sanitary manner. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 9> A progress note dated 01/06/2024 at 10:40 PM, documented Resident 9's dinner tray was being left at bedside and resident would eat items from the tray and that was concerning since it had been sitting on the bedside table for quite awhile. On 01/21/2024, breakfast had been served at 7:45 AM. During an observation at 9:05 AM, Resident 9's breakfast tray was observed sitting untouched on their bedside tray table. At 10:07 AM, it was observed that the breakfast tray had been removed except for the hot cereal and orange juice. At 12:20 PM, the hot cereal and orange juice still remained on the bedside table untouched and the lunch tray had been delivered. At 1:04 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 sampled residents (117, 53, 2, and 55), reviewed for unnecessary medications, were informed of the potential risks and benefits associated with the use of psychotropic medications (medications that can affect the mind, emotions, and behaviors). Failure to obtain the informed consents and/or include necessary information about the medication such as reasons for taking and benefits resulted in the resident and/or representative not being fully informed. Findings included . <Resident 117> Per the 01/22/2024 admission assessment, Resident 117 had diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia (a chronic, severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, and perceives reality) and received psychotropic medications daily. A review of the Order Summary Report showed on 01/17/2024, Resident 117 was prescribed psychotropic medication (Trazodone and Venlafaxine) to treat depression, and Risperidone to treat the symptoms associated with Schizophrenia. In addition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sample residents (56), reviewed for medication management, received adequate monitoring to ensure appropriate administration of a high-risk medication. Failure to monitor edema (excess fluid in the tissues) placed the residents at risk for compromised heart health. In addition, the facility failed to ensure timely bowel care was provided for 3 of 3 sample residents (9,10, and 55) reviewed for constipation which placed the residents at risk for constipation and unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the article Loop Diuretics published by the National Library of Medicine on 05/22/2023, Loop diuretics (such as Furosemide) included a black box warning (the highest safety-related warning that has been assigned by the Food and Drug Administration to inform consumers of the medications potential and serious side effects) and careful medical supervision was necessary to monitor the patient's response (blood pressure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication boxes/kits which contained controlled medications (medications that have a high risk for abuse such as narcotics, anti-anxiety, hypnotic and hallucinogenic) and stored in the medication refrigerators were affixed as required for 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. In addition, the facility failed to consistently monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures to ensure they were at safe storage levels. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication and placed the facility at risk for potential diversion or misappropriation of narcotic medications. Findings included . Per the 01/20/2023 article titled Storage and Handling of Immunobiologics published by the Center for Disease Control, failure to follow recommended storage and refrigerator temperatures for immunobiologics (a medicinal preparation made from living organisms and their products, such as a serum or vaccine)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete and accurate, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 2 of 2 sampled residents (1, 50) reviewed for abuse, 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for activities (2), and 1 of 1 sampled resident (12) reviewed for care planning. Failure to document pertinent resident information placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, decreased continuity of care, and diminished quality of life. In addition, the facility failed to provide access timely to resident records for 15 of 17 sampled residents (169, 62, 1, 16, 2, 53, 167, 33, 55, 58, 3, 117, 25, 18, and 56) reviewed for Advance Directives, and failed to timely provide the facility staffing documentation that had been requested for review of the sufficient staffing task. Findings included . <Resident 1> The 12/05/2023 quarterly assessment showed Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was able to make decisions regarding their care. In addition, the assessment showed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during the meal service for 1 of 3 dining rooms, and during wound care for 1 of 1 sampled residents (58) reviewed for non-pressure wounds. These failures placed the residents at risk for infections and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Dining Room> During a lunch observation in the [NAME] unit dining room on 01/18/2024 at 11:53 AM, Staff O, Nursing Assistant, cut up a resident's turkey, without gloves and touched the prongs of fork with their hands and gave it to the resident to eat with. Staff O, then pushed a resident up to the table, did not perform hand hygiene and continued to pass meal trays. During an observation at 12:13 PM, Staff O passed out meal trays to residents who did not eat in the dining room. Staff O entered room [ROOM NUMBER] with a meal tray and placed it on resident's tray table and left the room without performing hand hygiene. Staff O then went to the dining room, grabbed another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure investigations related to allegations of abuse/neglect were initiated, thorough, and completed timely for 2 of 2 sampled residents (1, 50), reviewed for abuse. These failures placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents and potential abuse. Findings included Review of the 08/01/2023 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation facility policy showed allegations of abuse were to be reported to the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) or designee immediately and the state agency within 2 hours if there was alleged abuse or serious bodily injury as a result of an event, and within 24 hours if the event that caused the injury did not involve abuse or did not result in serious bodily injury. The policy also showed a thorough investigation of an alleged violation would be completed and would include conducting interviews and an assessment of the alleged victim as appropriate. The policy also showed the results of all investigations would be reported to the State agency in accordance with State and Federal law within 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or related conditions], was completed for 2 of 5 sampled residents (50, 55), reviewed for PASARR services. This failure placed the residents at risk for inappropriate placement, and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet mental health care needs. Findings included . <Resident 55> According to the 11/07/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 55 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and received psychotropic medication, (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior). Review of Resident 55s's Level I PASARR showed it was completed and signed by Staff F, Social Services, on 09/02/2023, 35 days after the resident's admission to the facility, and not prior to admission as required. In an interview on 01/24/2024 at 5:13 PM Staff F,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 sampled residents (53, 12) reviewed for activities of daily living, received assistance with grooming and maintaining clean glasses. These failures placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and impaired vision. Findings included . <Resident 53> According to Resident 53's quarterly assessment dated [DATE], they required assistance with activities of daily living, including transferring, dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing. Resident 53's care plan dated 05/02/2023, directed nursing staff to assist them with personal hygiene, such as trimming facial hair and shaving. During an observation on 01/18/2024 at 10:21 AM, Resident 53 was sitting in their wheelchair and had nasal hair that protruded out of their nose. Subsequent observations made on 01/20/2024 at 8:10 AM, 01/21/2024 at 9:02 AM, 1/21/2024 at 1:02 PM, 01/22/2024 at 9:19 AM, 01/22/2024 at 11:18 AM, and 01/23/2024 at 8:57 AM, all showed Resident 53's nasal hair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled residents (2) reviewed for activities, received an ongoing program of activities that met their interests. Failure to assess the resident's activity preferences placed the resident at risk for boredom and diminished quality of life. Findings included Review of the 12/26/2023 quarterly assessment showed Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment, was able to direct their care, and had diagnoses which included dementia and depression. The assessment showed the resident was independent with activities of daily living, including moving around the facility in their wheelchair, and it was very important to the resident to be involved in activities that included: reading materials, pets, news, and doing favorite activities. Review of Resident 2's 08/22/2023 care plan showed a quarterly and annual assessment would be done to ensure resident's activity preferences were accurate. Review of resident's record from 12/14/2021 through 01/20/2024 showed no activity assessments had been completed as care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were offered as ordered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (9), reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the resident, who had experienced significant weight loss, at risk for further loss. Findings included . The 11/28/2017 Nutritional Assessment facility policy, last revised on 08/01/2023, defined nutritional supplements as products that are used to complement a resident's dietary needs. A review of the record showed Resident 9 had diagnoses including diabetes (a disease in which your body does not make enough insulin), kidney failure and depression. According to a 01/16/2024 annual assessment, Resident 9 was cognitively intact, did not reject care, was able to eat independently, weighed 143 pounds (lbs.) and had lost 5% of their weight in one month or 10% in six months, and was not on a prescribed diet. A 01/12/2024 Nutrition at Risk assessment by Staff J, Registered Dietitian (RD,) documented Resident 9 weighed 170.4 lbs on 07/06/2023 and had lost 15.8% of their weight. Staff J…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews at least once every 12 months, and provide in-service education based on the outcome of the reviews as required, for 1 of 5 sampled staff (L), whose records were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving care from inadequately trained staff. Findings included . Per review of Staff L, Nursing Assistant's file, they had a performance evaluation that was last completed on 06/16/2021, not yearly as required. During an interview on 01/26/2024 at 3:08 PM, Staff M, Staff Development Coordinator, stated they were unsure how often performance evaluations were completed. Staff M stated they had a workshop last year in which certain skills had been performed by nursing staff. During an interview on 01/26/2024 at 3:42 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated they completed performance evaluations yearly and were aware that some employees did not have theirs completed or updated. Reference: WAC 388-97-1680 (1)(2)(a-c)
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
<Resident 16> Per the 12/26/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 16 had diagnoses including kidney failure and diabetes (a disease in which your body does not make enough insulin). Review of the physciain orders showed on 07/03/2023, Resident 16 was presecribed Lispro (sliding scale insulin, a hormone used to treat diabetes and given based on blood glucose levels). The July, August, and September 2023 Monthly Medication Review (MMR) documented a recommendation to discontinue the sliding scale insulin as mentioned above and no response was obtained. The October 2023 MMR documented a recommendation to discontinue the Lispro insulin sliding scale and the physician responded on 11/10/23, nearly four months since the recommendation was first made. Reference: WAC 388-07-1300 (4)(c) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow-up on pharmacist recommendations for medication changes, and to implement recommended changes in a timely fashion for 2 of 5 sampled residents (16, 55), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that orders for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (a type of medication used to affect mood, behavior, and perceptions) was limited to14 days, and was given for an appropriate diagnosis for 1 of 5 sampled residents (55). These failures placed the residents at risk for unintended medication side effects and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 55> A review of records showed Resident 55 had diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, depression, and anxiety. A quarterly assessment completed on 11/07/2023 showed Resident 55 had moderate cognitive impairment and was not able to make needs known. Review of physician orders showed on 08/08/2023, Resident 55 was prescribed and received Lorazepam as needed for anxiety. Review of the Order Summary Report documented the last 14 day stop date as required for the as needed Lorazepam was obtained on 08/11/2023. A review of the resident's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for August 2023 through October 17, 2023, documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate licensing necessary to carry out the functions of the nutritional services for 68 residents. Failure to ensure Staff J, Registered Dietician (RD) had a license to practice in Washington State placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and possible unintended weight loss or gain. Findings included . On [DATE], a review of the Washington State Department of Health Provider Credential database showed Staff J's license to practice as a dietitian had been expired since [DATE], and they were no longer licensed to practice as a dietician in Washington State as of that date. In an interview on [DATE], Staff J confirmed their license had expired on [DATE], and stated they were not aware it had expired until Staff B, Director of Nursing, had called and asked for it. Upon learning it was expired, Staff J immediately called the licensing board and paid the fees to renew the license. Review of an email…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the required qualifications (current Food Worker Cards) for one dietary staff (W). This failed practice had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed all residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Findings included . A review of the dietary cards showed no Washington State Food Workers card for Staff W (hire date 2/18/2023). Staff W did have a certificate dated 1/25/2024 from Food Handler Solutions for completing the food handler's course. Review of Food Handler Solutions website, foodhandlersolutions.com/[NAME]-food-handler-card/ showed, the Food Handler Solutions Program is currently not approved in the state of [NAME]. This program is only intended to be used for personal development and preparation for the state provided training. A review of the staffing schedules showed Staff W had worked in the kitchen the following dates/times: 1/18/2024 1:04pm - 6:32pm 1/20/2024 8:05am -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Survey Agency as required, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse. Failure to report potential abuse placed Resident 1 and additional residents in the facility at risk for uninvestigated abuse, mistreatment, and poor quality of life. Findings included . Review of 09/28/2023 admission assessment showed Resident was unable to make themself understood and required substantial staff assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the facility incident log for October and November 2023 showed Resident 1 had a fall on 10/08/2023 that resulted in superficial skin injuries and a fall on 10/16/2023 with no injuries. No additional entries for Resident 1 were found on the logs. In an interview on 01/12/2024 at 4:44 PM, a representative for Resident 1 stated the resident was admitted to the facility September 2023 after a surgery to repair a fractured hip. Per the representative, they received a phone call from unidentified facility staff on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sample residents (Resident 2) reviewed for IV therapy. The facility failed to provide Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) care, maintenance and monitoring to include changing needleless injection caps, flushes, dressing changes, monitoring the external length to verify the line had not migrated, and monitoring insertion site for signs and symptoms of infection. These failures placed the resident at risk for loss of vascular access, infection, and other potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the 10/14/2023 admission assessment for Resident 2 showed they received IV antibiotics. Per the assessment, the resident was cognitively intact and did not refuse care. Review of the home care instructions dated 10/13/2023 showed Resident 2 had a dual lumen (two separate working…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident's representative was informed of and consented to a new medication for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for care planning. This failure disallowed the resident and/or the resident representative to make an informed decision regarding treatment, and placed the resident at risk of diminished quality of life. Findings included Review of the 07/31/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 1 was severely cognitively impaired and needed assistance with decision making. Per the assessment the resident had diagnoses of fractures to their spine and anxiety. Review of a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA; document that establishes who is in charge of a person's health or financial decisions), dated 12/16/2019, showed Resident 1 had a personal representative appointed to assist in their health care planning. Review of the 07/2023 and 08/2023 Medication Administration Records (MARs) showed an order for Depakote sprinkles (an anticonvulsant medication used to treat seizures, bipolar disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 6), reviewed for non-pressure skin wounds. Failure to perform wound treatments as ordered placed the resident at risk for delayed wound healing, worsening of wounds, and/or potential infection and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the skilled nursing transfer report, dated 08/07/2023, showed Resident 6 admitted to the facility from the hospital with a surgical wound to their lower leg, and had a specialty dressing that was not to be removed for 14 days. Review of the August 2023 progress notes showed on 08/13/2023 the skin below Resident 6's incision was red and had large fluid filled blisters. New wound care orders were given by an orthopedic specialist. Review of the August 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed beginning on 08/13/2023 Resident 6 was to have daily wound care and and dressings. Further review showed no documentation that the ordered wound care was provided on 08/14/2023, 08/15/2023, 08/17/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure multiple food items in the kitchen were properly labeled, and that out-of-date foods were identified and discarded. In addition, the facility failed to ensure unpasteurized eggs were not used for foods not fully cooked. The failure to properly label foods, ensure the visibility of Best By dates, and use pasteurized eggs, placed residents at risk for consuming expired/spoiled foods and exposure to food borne illness. Findings included . Observations of the kitchen showed: Unlabeled and expired food items Refrigerator observations on 10/24/2022 at 2:07 PM showed: 1. Three large unlabeled and undated items wrapped in aluminum foil on the lower shelf of the refrigerator. On 10/24/2022 at 2:09 PM, Staff I, Dietary Manager, stated that they were just cooked turkey meat and acknowledged the food items needed a Use By date. 2. An unopened large bag of unlabeled and undated greens. 3. Three bags of six English muffins per bag, with a Best By date of 08/2022, for a total of 18 expired muffins. Staff I stated, I'll throw it away…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' records had complete and readily accessible Advance Directives and Vaccination Consents for 6 residents (6, 12, 25, 26, 33, and 47) of 15 residents whose records were reviewed for Advance Directives and immunizations. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Advance Directives Resident 12 Review of an 08/13/2022 comprehensive admission assessment showed Resident 12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions. The assessment showed the staff assessed Resident 12's cognition as moderately impaired. Review of an 08/10/2022 admission Care Conference note showed Resident 12 and their representative attended the care conference. This note showed the facility conducted a Review of Advance Directive and concluded the review was Accurate. Review of an 08/12/2022 Psychosocial History form showed the staff identified Resident 12 had a POA [Power of Attorney]/Living Will, and who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop thorough policies, and implement abuse and neglect prevention policies and procedures including, identifying, reporting, and investigating abuse, and protection of residents after verbal reports of rough handling during care were made, for 2 of 4 sampled residents (39, 31), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential abuse, neglect, and unmet care needs. Findings included . A revised 07/13/2018 facility policy and procedure titled Preventing Abuse showed: Procedure - Prevention - (2) (c) Observe residents, visitors and staff to identify inappropriate behaviors, such as using derogatory language, rough handling, taking or using photographs or recording in any manner that would demeanor humiliate a resident(s), etc. The policy and procedure showed instructions to the staff regarding the observation of rough handling. Further review of the policy showed no instruction to staff on how to address verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report resident verbal reports of rough handling during care as an allegations of abuse for 2 of 4 sampled residents (39, 31), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential abuse, neglect, and unmet care needs. Findings included . RESIDENT 39 Review of the 09/24/2022 admission assessment showed that Resident 39 had severe cognitive impairment but was able to make their needs known. Resident 39 reported to surveyor, during the initial interview on 10/25/2022 at 9:42 AM, that one staff member was rough during care. RESIDENT 31 Review of the 09/15/2022 admission assessment showed that Resident 31 had no cognitive deficits and made decisions regarding their care. Resident 31 reported to the surveyor, during the initial interview on 10/25/2022 at 11:04 AM, that two staff members were rough during an assessment. On 10/25/2022 at 11:44 AM, Staff A, Administrator, was informed of the allegations of rough handling during care, from Residents 39 and 31. On 10/27/2022 at 8:30 AM, a review of the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate resident verbal reports of rough handling during care as allegations of abuse for 2 residents of 4 sampled residents (39, 31), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential abuse, neglect, and unmet care needs. Findings included . RESIDENT 39 Review of the 09/24/2022 admission assessment showed that Resident 39 had severe cognitive impairment but was able to make their needs known. Resident 39 reported to surveyor during initial interview on 10/25/2022 at 9:42 AM that that one staff was rough during care. RESIDENT 31 Review of the 09/15/2022 admission assessment showed that Resident 31 had no cognitive deficits and made decisions regarding their care. Resident 31 reported to surveyor during initial interview on 10/25/2022 at 11:04 AM, that two staff members were rough during an assessment. On 10/25/2022 the facility was made aware of Resident 31 and 39's allegations. The allegations were reported to Staff A, Administrator, by the surveyors. In a follow-up interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming for 1 of 3 sampled residents (40), reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed the resident at risk for poor personal hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 09/20/2022 quarterly assessment, Resident 40 had severe cognitive impairment and needed assistance from one staff to complete activities of daily living, such as grooming. Observations of Resident 40 while sitting in their wheelchair with unshaved facial stubble were made on 10/24/2022 at 3:30 PM, 10/24/2022 at 4:41 PM, 10/25/2022 at 8:49 AM, and 10/26/2022 at 9:16 AM. In an interview on 10/27/2022 at 10:13 AM, Staff N, Nursing Assistant, stated residents were shaved on their bath days. Staff N further stated if the resident refused, then they would re-approach, and any refusals were documented in the resident's record. Review of Resident 40's bathing and grooming records from 10/24/2022 through 10/26/2022 showed the resident was bathed on 10/24/2022, and no refusals for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement bowel protocol orders as instructed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (25), reviewed for unnecessary medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for 2 of 4 sampled residents (43, 267) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Failure to treat Resident 25's constipation, consistently monitor blood pressure for Resident 43, and obtain wound care orders for Resident 267 placed the residents at risk for clinical complications and unmet care needs. Findings included . RESIDENT 43 Per the 09/20/2022 annual assessment, Resident 43 had diagnoses of high blood pressure and took a diuretic (a medication used to help the body get rid of excess fluid by producing more urine), daily. Observations on 10/24/2022 at 3:44 PM, 10/25/2022 at 8:51 AM, 10/26/2022 at 9:18 AM and 10:59 AM showed the resident sitting in their wheelchair beside their bed; both feet were without shoes, socks and were edematous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to show adequate indication for the use of a seizure medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (25), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving an unnecessary medication, and its adverse outcomes. Findings included . Review of an 08/30/2022 quarterly assessment showed Resident 25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions, to include cardiac diagnoses, dementia, and psychiatric disorders. The assessment showed Resident 25 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the October 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed an order for Gabapentin (a seizure medication) Tablet, by mouth at bedtime for -. The Gabapentin order showed a start date of 05/28/2022, the day of Resident 25's admission to the facility, and no indication for its use. The MAR showed the staff administered the Gabapentin every night at bedtime. Review of a 09/06/2022 physician progress note showed no mention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. Three medication errors were identified for 2 of 3 sampled residents (78,16), observed during 29 medication opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.34 percent. Errors in medication administration had the potential to place residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication. Findings included: RESIDENT 78 On 10/25/2022 at 9:17 AM Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse, was observed to administer one 450 milligram (mg) Cranberry tablet and one 81 mg. enteric coated aspirin (a medication which had a special coating that prevents release and absorption of contents until it reaches the small intestine) to the resident. On 10/26/2022 at 10:45 AM Staff Q, Registered Nurse, was observed to administer one 81 mg. enteric coated aspirin to the resident. When the order for the Cranberry tablet was reviewed by the nurse, they recognized they did not have the correct dose per the physician order and spoke with Staff R,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike, and safe environment for 3 of 17 rooms (211, 213, 106), sampled for a safe and sanitary environment. Failure to ensure that the facility was free from damaged walls and a broken door, placed the residents (25, 33, 38) at risk for injury and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . room [ROOM NUMBER]-A Observations on 10/24/2022 at 3:12 PM showed Resident 33 sitting between the bed and the wall. The wall showed areas of chipped paint. Resident 33 stated, The door can't close. It's broken. It gets worse each time they mess with it. It's been over a week now. That's a safety issue, it's a fire door. Observation of the door showed it closed half of the way. room [ROOM NUMBER]-B Observations on 10/24/2022 at 4:26 PM showed two unfinished and rough-to-touch white patches to the wall, next to an empty bed in Resident 25's room. The size of each of the identified areas was approximately 1 to 1 ½ feet by 4 inches.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$32,711 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $32,711 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASCADIA WASHINGTON OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2021 |
| CASCADIA HC GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/05/2025 |
| CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2021 |
| CASCADIA HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/05/2025 |
| HAMMOND, OWEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2021 |
| LAFORTE, STEPHEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/05/2025 |
| NELSON, TIMOTHY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/05/2025 |
| TIMBERLINE OHI TENANT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/05/2025 |
| WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 08/11/2022 |
| CASCADIA SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/13/2025 |
| RUDOLPH, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/04/2025 |
| SCHILLER, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/18/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $524K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505283. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.