Weiser Care of Cascadia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 49.3 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for hand hygiene during housekeeping tasks, hand hygiene during medication administration, and safe infection control practices in the laundry room. This failure affected all residents who receive medications and laundry services and created the potential for adverse outcomes related to cross contamination. Findings include:The facility's Hand Hygiene policy revised 9/15 25, documented hand hygiene was recognized as a cornerstone of effective infection control and was essential in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. All healthcare workers should perform hand hygiene at critical moments during resident care. These moments include but are not limited to:Immediately before and after touching a resident.After contact with objects and surfaces in the resident's environment.Immediately after PPE removal (gloves, gowns, eye protection, face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, sanitary, and homelike environment when trash and laundry services were not provided. This was true for 2 of 15 residents (#5 and #7) reviewed for frequency of laundry and housekeeping services. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial harm if residents' laundry and trash were not cleaned creating an unwelcome and unsanitary environment for residents and/or their visitors. Findings include:The facility's policies, Homelike Environment, revised 9/17/25, and Housekeeping & Laundry Services, dated 10/8/25, documented residents have the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment which promotes dignity, independence, and quality of life. Additionally, the facility should maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior environment at all times, and housekeeping and laundry services are essential to a resident safety, dignity, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a required 30 day written notice of discharge for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for discharge process. This failure created the potential for psychosocial harm when Resident #58 received a verbal notice and subsequently chose to leave the facility against medical advice. Findings include:The facility's Notice of Discharge and/or Transfer Policy, dated 10/7/25, documented the facility ensures that systems are implemented to provide a written notification to the residents prior to transfer.Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and a need for assistance with personal care.Resident #58's care plan, dated 10/23/25, documented he was an independent smoker and had been educated on the facility's smoking policy.A progress note dated 10/29/25 at 10:53 AM, documented Resident #58 was educated on appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a PASRR level II to the designated state agency. This was true for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #7) whose record was reviewed for PASRR documentation. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if Resident #7's coordination of care was not completed between the facility and the designated state agency, with interventions appropriately documented in Resident #7's care plan. Findings include:The facility's PASRR Process policy, revised 8/29/25, documented a positive PASRR Level I, necessitates an in-depth evaluation of the individual by the state-designated authority, known as a PASRR Level II. Recommendations from the PASRR Level II determination are to be incorporated into the person-centered care plan.Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia and PTSD.A PASRR Level I, dated 8/13/25, documented Resident #7's diagnoses of dementia and PTSD, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person centered care plan according to the resident's identified needs. This was true for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. This failure created the potential for harm when Resident #42 was not monitored for signs and symptoms of withdrawal as directed in the care plan. Findings include:The facility's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and Comprehensive Care Plans Policy, revised 9/3/25, documented the care plan is developed consistent with the resident's specific condition, risks, needs, behaviors, cultural preferences, and standards of practice.Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including other stimulant use, depression, and nutritional deficiency.Resident #42's care plan, revised 10/13/25, directed staff to monitor and document for potential signs of withdrawal, including:respiratory distresscardiac…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered according to professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #29) observed during medication administration. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #29 to develop Candida albicans infection in her mouth (oral thrush - a fungal infection characterized by painful, creamy white, cottage cheese-like patches on the tongue, inner cheeks or throat) when she did not rinse her mouth with water after inhaling her steroid medication. Findings include:The Symbicort (an inhaler containing corticosteroid) Prescribing Information under Warning and Precautions documented Localized infections: Candida albicans infection of the mouth and throat may occur. Monitor patients periodically for signs of adverse effects on the oral cavity. Advise the patient to rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing after inhalation to help reduce the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure smoking paraphernalia was stored in a safe location for 2 of 3 residents (#6 and #42) reviewed for smoking. This failure created the potential for harm when Resident #6's smoking assessment was not accurate and when Resident #42 was observed sleeping in her bed while holding a vape device. Findings include:The facility's Non Smoking Campus Policy, revised 9/12/25, documented the facility maintained a smoke free environment to promote the health, safety, and comfort of residents, staff, visitors, volunteers, and contractors. The policy stated that smoking is not permitted anywhere on the premises, including buildings, grounds, and parking areas, and applied to cigarettes, cigars, pipes, e cigarettes, and vaping devices.1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including kidney disease, diabetes, COPD (a progressive, treatable, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the pharmacists' recommendation. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This created the potential for Resident #48 to develop Candida albicans infection in his mouth (oral thrush - a fungal infection characterized by painful, creamy white, cottage cheese-like patches on the tongue, inner cheeks or throat). Findings include:The facility's Pharmacist Consultation Policy revised 9/16/25, documented irregularities were reported to the provider, and the provider will provide documentation of accepting or rejecting recommendations with documentation present in the medical record.The Symbicort (an inhaler containing corticosteroid) Prescribing Information under Warning and Precautions documented Localized infections: Candida albicans infection of the mouth and throat may occur. Monitor patients periodically for signs of adverse effects on the oral cavity. Advice the patient to rinse his/her mouth with water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #8) whose medication regimens were reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed Resident #8 at risk for adverse outcomes from overmedication when he was receiving nicotine patches, had an order for nicotine gum, and was smoking cigarettes. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including incomplete quadriplegia (a spinal cord injury which causes paralysis in all four limbs but leaves some voluntary motor or sensory function below the injury level) and COPD. Resident #8's EHR documented he was assessed for independence with smoking on 1/15/26 and 2/11/26. Resident #8's physicians orders documented the following:- Nicotine Transdermal Patch 24 Hour 14 MG/24HR, Apply 1 patch transdermally one time a day for Nicotine, Make sure to remove old…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were safely stored when unattended by staff. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #18) whose medications were observed in his room. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if the medications were taken by another resident. Findings include:The facility's Medication Storage & Labeling policy released 10/13/25, documented the facility will ensure that medications were stored and labeled in accordance with CMS regulations, state law, and acceptable professional principles to ensure safety, efficacy, and compliance. The policy stated for general medications: Store in locked compartments (cabinets, carts, medication room).Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including myocardial infarction (heart attack) and diabetes.A Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #18 was cognitively intact.On 2/17/26 at 11:05…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $271K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID