No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Teton Healthcare of Cascadia

3111 Channing Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83404 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 88 certified beds · (208) 529-0067 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (208) 529-0067 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$36,190 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,190 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-20)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3200 Channing Way Ste 304 · (208) 535-4567 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Lincare<0.1 mi
2265 Desoto St · (208) 524-4211 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2455 E 25th St · (208) 534-5755 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1905 E Sunnyside Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.1%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.7%15.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.9%16.1%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.0%16.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.7%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%3.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.6%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.7%20.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.8%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.8%86.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%17.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.771.171.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.791.661.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 192 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.80U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.46hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.80 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.9%CMS range 44.2–55.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.5–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.5–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.83
RN hoursweekends
60.8%
Total nursing turnover
54.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 70.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.50 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's investigation report, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper storage and use of Hoyer lift equipment to prevent resident falls or injury. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #233) whose record was reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #233 when proper use of a Hoyer lift was not provided. Findings include: The facility Space and Equipment policy revision date 12/4/19, documented under Procedure 6. Resident care equipment is stored after use in an area out of egress while maintaining availability. Licensed nursing and plant operations will validate proper storage and availability of resident care equipment when not in use. On 12/17/24 at 10:13 AM, observed a Hoyer lift being stored in room [ROOM NUMBER] which created a potential fall hazard when residents try to leave the room with their walker or wheelchair. On 12/18/24 at 11:40 AM, the CRN stated Hoyer lifts should not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-12-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of policy, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were trained and had documented competencies to operate the facility Hoyer lifts and b) Licensed nurses had appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide respiratory related services to residents. This was true for all nursing staff employed by the facility. This had the potential for adverse effects and harm to residents who are transferred with Hoyer lifts or had an order for respiratory therapy. Findings include: The facility Competency Verification of Nursing Staff policy revised on 3/1/24, documented that completed competencies and education plans should be filed in employee's education file to include new hires' competency verification and annual competency review. 1. Resident #233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including necrosis of left femur and dementia. On 6/26/24 at 5:30 PM, during a Hoyer lift transfer for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were initially assessed to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #49). This failure created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately. Findings include:The facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy dated 11/28/17, documented under Procedure 2. the interdisciplinary team determines that it is safe for the resident to self-administer drugs before the resident is allowed to do so, and the decision is periodically reviewed according to the resident's status. Procedure 2b. documented the determination of who will be responsible (resident or the nursing staff) for storage and documentation of the administration of drugs, as well as the location of the drug administration. Procedure 4. documented appropriate notation of these determinations is documented in the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 2 of 17 residents (#4 and #5) reviewed for residents' rights. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident could not call for assistance when needed or experienced an adverse medical event that required attention. Findings include: The facility's Call Light Response Time policy, revision date 10/15/22, documented. Procedure 1. Resident Access a. Call light systems are expected to be available, within reach, at the bedside and in toileting and bathing areas.Resident #4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including unspecified psychosis (symptoms of a significant disconnection from reality, such as hallucinations, delusions, or disorganized behavior) and muscle weakness. On 3/2/26 at 8:07 AM, observed Resident #4 sitting at her side table in the middle of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (CMS- 10123 form) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #81) reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This deficient practice had the potential to cause financial harm or distress for residents when they were not informed of their potential liability for payment when their Medicare Part A benefits ended. Findings include: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including post-surgical repair of fracture left femur and muscle weakness.On 3/4/26 at 1:20 PM, during record review the NOMNC documented .effective date coverage of your current skilled nursing facility services will end on 11/18/25, however; the NOMNC had a signature of resident and resident's representative on 11/17/25.On 3/4/26 at 1:35 PM, review of Social Services Note dated 11/17/25 12:12, documented Social Services spoke with daughter via telephone about the NOMNC issued for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was true for the facility. This deficient practice created the potential for diminished quality of life and safety risk including potential for infections and cross-contamination. Findings include:On 3/2/26 at 12:22 PM, observed two large dining room ceiling vents with brown hairy-like debris covering 1/3 of the inside of each vent and a small strip of red confetti-like paper in one vent.On 3/2/26 at 12:23 PM, observed brown/black discoloration on the ceiling around the other dining room ceiling vents.On 3/2/26 at 12:34 PM, the CEO stated the vents should have been cleaned and had not been.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a written notice of transfer and bed hold policy was provided to the resident or their representative when residents were transferred to the hospital. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial distress if residents and their representatives were not made aware of or able to exercise their rights related to transfers from the facility. Findings include:The facility's Discharge or Transfer policy revised 8/30/25, documented under NOTICE OF TRANSFER OR discharge: 1. The facility must provide the resident, the resident's representative (if any), and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman with a written notice at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged , except when .c. The resident's urgent medical needs require an immediate transfer.The facility's Bed-Hold policy revised 9/9/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of resident's admission. This was true for 2 of 3 Residents (#2 & #73) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure created the potential for harm when the care plan failed to provide direction for care. Findings include:The facility's Baseline Care Plans policy revised date 10/15/22, documented under Procedure 1. A baseline plan of care is developed within 48 hours of admission to address the immediate needs of the residents and will be utilized/updated as needed until a comprehensive care plan can be developed and implemented. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease (the final, irreversible phase of kidney failure where kidneys no longer function sufficiently on their own, requiring dialysis or a transplant for survival) and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (acute hypoxic (or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include.Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure and other abnormalities of breathing. On 3/2/26 at 8:07 AM, during interview Resident #3 stated his left arm is swollen and has been for a while. On 3/2/26 at 8:08 AM and 3/5/26 at 9:52 AM, observed Resident #3 sitting in his room not wearing a compression glove to the left hand and Tubi grip sleeve to his left arm from the wrist to the shoulder. On 3/2/26 at 11:03 AM, during record review noted Resident #3 physician order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate and posted daily for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels. Findings include:On 3/3/26 at 1:50 PM, observed the Daily Staffing sheets for February 2025 through July 2025, noting the name of the facility and LPN hours were not listed on any of these sheets.On 3/4/26 at 10:35 AM, the CEO stated the LPN hours, and name of the facility should have been on the daily staffing sheet from February 2025 through July 2025 but were not.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include:On 3/3/26 at 8:52 AM, observed during the 400 Hall medication cart audit the narcotic accountability sheet, dated 3/2/26 to 3/3/26, with 1 licensed nurse signature not documented on 3/3/26. On 3/3/26 at 8:53 AM, RN #2 stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability sheet and had not. On 3/4/26 at 8:44 AM, observed during the 100 Hall medication cart audit the narcotic accountability sheets, dated 2/6/26 to 2/12/26, 2/13/26 to 2/20/26, and 3/1/26 to 3/3/26 with 1 licensed nurse signature not documented on 2/11/26, 2/12/26, 2/13/26, 2/19/26, and 3/3/26. On 3/4/26 at 8:48 AM, RN #4 stated two nurses should have signed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders documented adequate indications, diagnosis, or duration for use when residents were prescribed antibiotics. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #14), reviewed for antibiotic use. This failed practice had the potential to cause significant harm if the resident was to develop an antimicrobial resistance or toxicity. Findings include:The facility's Physician/Providers Orders Policy, revised 9/12/25, documented under Procedure the following:2. Ensure each medication order includes:Resident nameDrug name and strengthIndication or diagnosisDosage, frequency, route, and durationOther monitoring/parameters required by state or federal regulationThe facility's Unnecessary Medications Policy, revised 9/10/25, documented The facility will ensure that each resident's medication regimen is free from unnecessary medications. This includes medications prescribed in excessive dose, without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired and were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. This was true for the facility. This failure created the potential for residents to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy and potential for harm to a resident if they obtain medications which were left unattended and unsecured by staff. Findings include: The facility's policy, Medication Storage & Labeling, dated 10/13/25, documented.Procedure 2. Storage Requirements a. General Medications: i. Store in locked compartments (cabinets, carts, medication rooms), ii. Maintain clean, sanitary conditions: prevent contamination.5. Disposal a. Expired or discontinued medications must be removed promptly and disposed of per facility policy and DEA guidelines to prevent diversion. On 3/2/26 at 8:50 AM, observed in the Medication Storage room with LPN #1 present the following:Three bottles of Rena Vite 100 tablets with a manufacturer printed expiration date of 1/2026Two bottles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the FDA Food Code, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was appropriately stored, distributed, and labeled, cooking equipment was free of encrustation, and the floors were properly cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:The FDA Food Code 2022, 3-501.17 documented, Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 C (41 F) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1.The FDA Food Code 2022, 4-601.11, documented, Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment during medication administration. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #60) observed for infection control. These failures put residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include:The facility's policy, Medication Administration, revision date, 12/18/21, 9/10/25, documented.Procedure 9. a. Remove medication from the storage receptacle (container, bottle, or blister pack) without directly touching the medication.Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that restricts airflow causing breathing difficulty) and diabetes.Resident #60's physician orders documented fifteen morning medications for resident including Colace 100 mg - 1 soft gel capsule by mouth.On 3/4/26 at 8:30 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, homelike environment. This was true for all residents who resided in the facility who are transferred with Hoyer lift equipment. This deficient practice created the potential for harm from cross contamination due to equipment not being cleaned between use. Findings include:The facility Work Practices Cleaning policy dated 1/1/18, documented multiple use resident care items are properly cleaned/disinfected between each resident use. Resident care items may include but is not limited to resident lifts.The following areas were observed: - On 8/14/25 at 7:55 AM, observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], a sticky substance on the over the bed table and a dry black substance on commode. - On 8/14/25 at 8:25 AM, observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], next to Resident #89’s bed and by the bathroom door a trash can with soiled briefs in it. On 8/14/25 at 8:30 AM, CNA #4 stated the garbage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include:The facility Accidents and Supervision to Prevent Accidents policy dated 10/15/22, documented under falls, development of a person-center plan of care by the interdisciplinary team can evaluate potential use of therapy, devices, environmental adjusts, review of medications, and treatment of other impacting factors may reduce the number of outcome severity of falls. If fall occurs, manage the fall, then determine root-cause analysis to assist with updates to the fall prevention plan. When reviewing root-cause, evaluate all the causal factors leading to the resident fall as the(y)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were stored appropriately; this was true for 1 of 18 resident's rooms inspected (Resident #1). This failure created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately or did not take their medications. Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and hypertension.On 8/14/25 at 8:44 AM, observed on Resident #1's bedside table a medication cup with a purple substance with multi-colored specks and a spoon in it.On 8/14/25 at 8:48 AM, RN #1 stated Resident #1 did not have an order to self-administer medications, she did not have it documented in her care plan to self-administer medication so she should not have left the medications in her room.On 8/14/25 at 11:38 AM, the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adherence to infection control and prevention practices to provide a safe and sanitary environment, when staff did not follow proper enhanced barrier precautions protocol. These failures had the potential to impact 1 of 5 residents (Resident #70) observed with EBP signs on their room doors, placing them all at risk for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include:Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acute cystitis (inflammation of the bladder) and dysphagia (difficulty or pain with swallowing). On 8/14/25 at 7:36 AM, observed CNA #2 had not donned a gown or gloves when she assisted Resident #70 with a transfer from her bed into her wheelchair and then into the shower room where she assisted her with a shower. Resident #70 was on EBP with a sign on her door that documented for staff to wear gown and gloves when assisting with transfers and showering. On 8/14/25 at 7:40 AM, CNA #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a) the kitchen equipment and environment was maintained and clean, and b) food was served in a safe and sanitary manner. These deficiencies placed all residents who consumed food prepared by the facility at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: The FDA Food Code Section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions, documented cleaning of the physical facilities is an important measure in ensuring the protection and sanitary preparation of food. A regular cleaning schedule should be established and followed to maintain the facility in a clean and sanitary manner. Primary cleaning should be done at times when foods are in protected storage and when food is not being served or prepared. The FDA Food Code Section 2-301.14 When to Wash. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms as specified: (F) During FOOD preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, homelike environment. This was true for all 74 residents who resided in the facility whose equipment and environment were observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if: a) residents were embarrassed by and/or felt the disrepair in the facility was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified and b) residents were injured due to unsafe areas in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Resident's Environment policy, revision date 11/28/19, documented: - The facility would provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. - Housekeeping and maintenance services would provide services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. The following areas were observed: - On 12/16/24 at 9:54 AM, observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], the baseboard by the shower stall was loose and sticking out from the wall. On 12/16/24 at 10:01…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) had correct assessment information. This was true for 3 of 5 residents (#27, #41, and #52) whose records were reviewed for accuracy. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), revised 10/1/2024, documents if a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II determines a resident has a serious mental illness then section A1500 of the MDS should be marked yes. 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including depression, bipolar disease, and schizophrenia. Resident #27's record documented a PASARR level II, dated 10/12/18, was completed. Resident #27's Significant Change MDS, section A1500, dated 2/20/23, documented no, he did not have a completed PASARR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans. This was true for 4 of 18 residents (#33, #34, #220, and #226) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly due to lack of information in their care plans. Findings include: The facility's Care Plans policy revision date 10/15/22, documented the facility develops and implements a comprehensive person-center care plan for each resident, consistent with the residents' rights and include measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including fractured pelvis and need for assistance with personal care. On 12/16/24 at 3:06 PM, Resident #33 stated she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 3 of 74 residents (#1, #33, and #226) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as resident's needs changed. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan policy, revision date 10/15/22, documented the team of qualified persons monitor the resident's condition and effectiveness of the care plan interventions and revises the care plan quarterly, annually, with a significant change assessment or more frequently as needed with input by the resident and/or the representative, to the extent possible based on the following: a. Achieving the desired outcome. b. Resident failure or inability to comply with or participate in a program to attain or maintain the highest practicable level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable and maintained correct temperatures. This failed practice affected 3 residents (#15, #45, and #226) and had the potential to negatively affect all residents' nutritional status and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The 2022 FDA Food Code, states hot food will be maintained at 135 degrees F or above and cold foods will be maintained at 41 degrees F or below. On 12/16/24 at 10:00 AM, resident #15 stated the food is cold and the cream of wheat is one big lump most days. On 12/16/24 at 12:58 PM, resident #226 stated the food is barely warm and soggy. On 12/16/24 at 3:15 PM, resident #45 stated the food is cold. On 12/20/24 at 8:20 AM, a tray from the last meal cart delivered on the 200 hall was tested for palatability and serving temperature with the following results: - Gravy = 120 degrees F - Scrambled eggs = 115 degrees F On 12/20/24 at 10:30 AM, the DM stated the temperature for the gravy and the scrambled eggs should be at 135 degrees F.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene Policy revision date 2/11/22, documented staff are to assist residents to wash their hands after toileting, when leaving their room, prior to eating or entering the dining room, and when soiled and/or potentially soiled. ABHR may be used as directed. The facility's Resident's Environment policy, revision date 11/28/19, documented the facility would provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The following were observed for hand hygiene: a) On 12/16/24 at 7:52 AM, Resident #3's meal tray was served to him in his room by the IP nurse. Resident #3 was not offered or encouraged to perform hand hygiene before eating. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the Advance Beneficiary Notice (CMS-10055 form) for 2 of 2 residents (#60 and #62) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (CMS- 10123 form) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #232) reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This deficient practice had the potential to cause financial harm or distress for residents when they were not informed of their potential liability for payment when their Medicare Part A benefits ended. Findings include: 1. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including left femur fracture and traumatic brain injury. A Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Notification Review documented Resident #60's Medicare A benefit ended on 11/20/24 and she continue to stay in the facility. Resident #60's record did not include an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN). 2. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's privacy was maintained during cares, treatment information was protected, and residents had unrestricted access to review mail in a timely manner. This was true for 1 of 4 medication carts, 1 of 18 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality, and all residents who receive mail at the facility. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of embarrassment, loss of control over their personal information, diminished quality of life, and psychosocial distress. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 10/15/22, documented the facility would take measures to ensure that each resident has the right to personal privacy. 1. On 12/16/24 at 8:00 AM, observed on hall 400, a computer on top of the medication cart opened to resident information, the medication cart keys were in the lock, and the cart was unlocked. On 12/16/24 at 8:02 AM, RN #1 stated she should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's hospital discharge instructions were reviewed upon readmission to the facility to assure physician orders were in place to meet their medical needs. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #53) whose records were reviewed. This failure placed Resident #53 at risk of delayed care and assessments for a foley catheter. Findings include: Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone caused by infection) of the right ankle and foot and diabetes. Resident #53's discharge Physician Orders & Plan of Care from the hospital dated 9/18/24, documented in the Physician Order section, bladder train and discontinue foley when able. Resident #53's Admissions MDS, dated [DATE], documented under Section H, Yes for indwelling catheter. On 12/19/24, a review of Resident #53's physician orders did not document an order for her to have a foley catheter,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve ability to carry out activities of daily living. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for restorative nursing services. This failure placed residents at risk for decreased range of motion, functional ability, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Quality of Life policy, revision date 10/15/22, documented the facility provides the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his/her ability to carry out activities of daily living and their abilities do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate such decline was unavoidable. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including fracture of the lower end of the left Tibia (shin bone) and need for assistance with personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician with resident's significant weight loss. This was true for 3 out of 18 residents (#34, #59 and #62) whose medical records were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause cognitive and functional decline. Findings include: 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and kidney failure. Resident #34's record documented on 11/13/24, he weighed 167 pounds. On 11/28/24, Resident #34 weighed 151 pounds which was a -9.58% weight loss. Resident #34's care plan directed staff to notify MD for weight change. On 12/20/24 at 10:43 AM, the CRN stated, the physician should have been notified of Resident #34's weight loss. 2. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including kidney failure and nutritional deficiency. Resident #59's record documented on 9/7/24, he weighed 199.2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of employee personal files, it was determined the facility failed to provide a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education per year for 1 of 2 CNAs (CNA #1), failed to ensure each CNA's performance was evaluated at least once every 12 months and annual evaluations were performed for 2 of 2 CNAs (CNA #1 and #4) whose personnel records were reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This failure created the potential for incompetent CNAs providing care and increased the risk for harm for all residents living in the facility. Findings include: The following were reviewed for 12 hours of in-service education: 1. On 12/20/24 at 9:45 AM, review of CNA #1's employee file documented her hire date was 2/1/22. Review of CNA #1's Employee in-service hours, documented she had 6 hours for 2022-2023. CNA #1 had no documented in-service training hours for 2023-2024. On 12/20/24 at 10:04 AM, the HR/Payroll coordinator stated CNA #1 had not completed her training and should have. The following were reviewed for annual performance reviews: 1. On 12/20/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate and posted daily for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels. Findings include: On 12/16/24 at 7:13 AM, observed the Daily Staffing form dated 12/14/24. On 12/16/24 at 7:22 AM, the Administrator stated the Daily Staffing form should have been changed every morning.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical necessity for psychotropic medication administration. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for psychotropic medication administration. This failure created the potential for negative side effects related to receiving psychotropic medications that are not necessary. Findings include: The facility's Psychoactive Drug Use policy revision date 10/15/22, documented psychoactive drugs are used only when necessary to treat a specific condition. Resident #40 was initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident #40's Acknowledgement of Psychoactive Medication Use form for Risperdal (antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar, and autism spectrum disorder) dated 12/28/22, did not document the medical symptom treated/basis for use. A Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review form dated 7/27/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were stored appropriately and properly labeled; this was true for 3 of 74 residents (#1, #50, and #223) rooms inspected and 1 of 4 medication carts observed. This failure created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately or receive the wrong medication due to improper labeling. Findings include: The facility's Medication Management policy revision date 10/15/22, documented: - medications are labeled in accordance with facility requirements, State and Federal regulations. - medications are provided in packaging to facilitate proper storage and administration of the medication using the agreed upon distribution system. The following was observed for medication in resident rooms: a) On 12/16/24 at 10:36 AM, observed in Resident #1's bathroom, another resident's tube of Calcipotriene ointment 0.005% (a prescription ointment to treat psoriasis). On 12/16/24 at 10:41 AM, the MDS Coordinator #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident food intolerances and preferences were accommodated. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #229). This had the potential for adverse health effects and possible harm to residents with food intolerances or allergies. Findings include: Resident #229 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including surgical aftercare, lactose intolerance, and gluten sensitivity. On 12/16/24 at 1:24 PM, Resident #229 stated her family had to bring her food in over the weekend because she needed a gluten and lactose free diet and the facility kept serving her gluten and lactose type foods. When she complained the facility brought her a grilled cheese sandwich. The menu for 12/14/24 included the following; - Breakfast - Coffee Cake, Cinnamon Baked Apple Slices, Fried Egg, Sausage Links, - Lunch - Ham & Cheese Croissant Sandwich, Shredded Lettuce/tomato, Barley Beef Vegetable Stew, Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookie,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident had a quarterly interdisciplinary care plan review that included participation of the physician or non-physician practitioner, a registered nurse, a nurse aide, or a member of the food and nutrition staff. This was true for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #17) whose care plans were reviewed. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided appropriately due to a lack of information in the care plan. Findings include: The facility's care plan policy, revised 11/29/19, stated: Care conference meetings are scheduled on admission, quarterly, and with change of condition. The facility provides sufficient notice in advance of the meeting, scheduling these meetings to accommodate a resident's representative (such as conducting the meeting in-person, via conference call, or video conferencing), and planning enough time for information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,190 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $25,604 — penalty dated 2024-12-20
  • $10,586 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Caldwell Care of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 1 of 5Cascadia of BoiseBoise, ID 1 of 5Cherry Ridge of CascadiaEmmett, ID 1 of 5Coeur d Alene Health of CascadiaCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Colfax Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColfax, WA 1 of 5Colville Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColville, WA 1 of 5Curry Village Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBrookings, OR 1 of 5Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 1 of 5Mount Ascension Transitional Care Of CascadiaHelena, MT 1 of 5Orchards of Cascadia, TheNampa, ID 1 of 5Spokane Valley Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadSpokane Valley, WA 2 of 5Cascadia of NampaNampa, ID 2 of 5Royal Plaza Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaLewiston, ID 2 of 5Salem Transitional CareSalem, OR 2 of 5Secora Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPortland, OR 2 of 5Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaSnohomish, WA 3 of 5Arbor Valley of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Brookfield Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBattle Ground, WA 3 of 5Clarkston Health And Rehab Of CascadiaClarkston, WA 3 of 5Clearwater Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaOrofino, ID 3 of 5Highland Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 3 of 5Northpark Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPhoenix, AZ 3 of 5Shaw Mountain of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Weiser Care of CascadiaWeiser, ID 4 of 5Canyon West of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 4 of 5Cascadia of LewistonLewiston, ID 4 of 5Cove of Cascadia, TheBellevue, ID 4 of 5Grangeville Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaGrangeville, ID 4 of 5Lewiston Transitional Care of CascadiaLewiston, ID 4 of 5Mountain Valley of CascadiaKellogg, ID 4 of 5Paradise Creek Health and Rehab of CascadiaMoscow, ID 4 of 5Stafholt Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBlaine, WA 4 of 5Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaNampa, ID 5 of 5Alderwood Park Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 5 of 5Aspen Park of CascadiaMoscow, ID 5 of 5Bend Transitional CareBend, OR 5 of 5Boswell Transitional Care Of CascadiaSun City, AZ 5 of 5Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaEugene, OR 5 of 5Fairlawn Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaGresham, OR 5 of 5Hudson Bay Health And RehabilitationVancouver, WA

Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASCADIA IDAHO OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2022
CASCADIA HC GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2022
CASCADIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
HAMMOND, OWENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2022
LAFORTE, STEPHENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
NELSON, TIMOTHYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
TIMBERLINE OHI TENANT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/11/2022
CASCADIA SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2025
HAMMOND, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2025
THOMSON, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$409K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 20%Other / private 23%

This home reported $409K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$401per resident / day
operating cost
$12,177per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$402per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Idaho
$10,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,175/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135138. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next