Cascadia of Lewiston

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 334 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 31.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's policy and procedure, review of Incidents and Accidents (I&A's) reports, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#133 and #134) reviewed for medication errors. Resident #134 was harmed when his J-tube had to be surgically replaced after being administered medications through it instead of by mouth per the physician's order and Resident #133 was potentially harmed when he was found to have 2 Fentanyl patches on his body instead of the ordered one patch. Findings include: The facility's Eight Rights of Medication Administration procedure, undated, directed the licensed nurse to check the following to administer the medication: - Right resident - Right medication - Right dose - Right route - Right time - Right documentation - Right reason - Right response 1. Resident #134 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately store, label, and serve foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 27 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen served in the dining room and resident rooms. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, stated 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1. The facility's Food and Supply Storage policy dated 11/28/17, documented under Policy for Labeling and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff rinsed and stored the nebulizer mouthpiece appropriately after each use. This was true for 5 of 5 residents (#7, #13, #15, #78, and #80). This failure placed residents at risk of respiratory infection due to growth of pathogens (organism that cause illnesses) in the respiratory equipment. Findings include: An article from American Heart Association website, accessed on 4/9/25 at https://www.lung.org, titled ABCs of Using a Nebulizer documented the following: - After each treatment, disassemble and wash the nebulizer parts in warm soapy water or in the dishwasher. - Rinse and let the pieces air dry and store in clean dry place. - Once a week soak them in a vinegar solution for 30 to 60 minutes to disinfect them. - The tubing and compressor for a jet nebulizer should never be put into water. They can be wiped with a damp soapy towel or disinfectant wipe if they get soiled. 1. Resident #7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, resident interview, test tray evaluation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure palatable food was served. This affected 5 of 16 residents (#2, #14, #16, #17, and #127) who were reviewed for dietary concerns. This failed practice created the potential to negatively affect residents' nutritional status and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The facility's Food Preparation policy dated 8/1/23, documented food is prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. The following resident interviews were conducted: On 3/31/24 at 4:04 PM, Resident #14 said the food is terrible, as if it came from a box like hamburger helper, no taste, the chicken has no flavor and sometimes food is too salty. On 3/31/25 at 4:15 PM, Resident #16 said food is not palatable and his daughter has started taking him home on Sundays to feed him good food. On 3/31/25 at 4:29 PM, Resident #2 said the food had bland taste and food that should be hot is sometimes served cold even though she eats in dining room. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determine the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to determined if they were safe to self-administer medication. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#5 and #7) reviewed for self-administration of medication. This failure created the potential for adverse outcomes if Resident #5 and #7 self-administered their inhaler inappropriately. Findings include: The facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy and procedure, released 11/28/17 documented the resident may self-administer drugs if the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is safe. Qualified nursing staff administers drugs until the determination is made. 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive lung disease characterized by increasing breathlessness.) A physician's order, dated 3/11/25 documented Resident #5 was to receive one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to promote and facilitate a resident's ability to make food choices. This was true for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for accommodation of food choices. This deficient practice placed Resident # 24 at risk for decreased sense of wellbeing and self-worth, and frustration when her food preferences were not accommodated. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy dated, 10/15/22 documented residents will be cared for in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including macular degeneration (a chronic eye disease that affects the macula, the central part of the retina responsible for sharp, central vision- meaning one cannot see right in front of them) and nutritional deficiency (this occurs when the body doesn't get enough of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, review of facility's Grievances, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents grievances were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #77) whose grievance was reviewed. This failure created the potential for Resident #77 to be subjected for ongoing abuse without detection and intervention. Findings include: The facility's Identification and Investigation of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, and Injuries of Unknown Origin policy and procedure, revised 8/1/23 documented the facility has processes in place to assist in preventing abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The policy documented residents, the accused and all witnesses would be interviewed. If there are no witnesses, consider interviewing all employees on the shift or the unit as appropriate as well as other residents on the unit. Upon the conclusion of the investigation, prepare a summary report of the findings and conclusions.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure information was provided to the receiving hospital for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if residents were not treated in a timely manner due to lack of information. Findings include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge policy and procedure, released 11/18/24 documented during an emergent transfers of a resident to an acute care, the following information are provided to the receiving provider: - Contact information of the practitioner who was responsible for the care of the resident. - Resident representative information, including contact information. - Advance directive information. - Special instructions and/or precautions for ongoing care, as appropriate, which must include, if applicable, but are not limited to: treatment and devices such oxygen, implants, intravenous, tubes/catheters, precautions such as isolation or contact,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist reviewed each residents' medications at least monthly, and the physician/prescriber addressed the medications irregularities identified by the pharmacist. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#3 and #17) whose medications were reviewed. These deficient practices created the potential for harm if residents' medications were administered without a clinical rationale. Findings include: The facility's policy, Pharmacy Consultation, dated 11/28/17, documented the Pharmacy Consultant would conduct monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for each resident in the facility. The review should address any side effects of medication; allergic reactions to antibiotic therapy; significant medication interactions; if prescribed medication was consistent with the resident's condition; whether the physician and staff have documented progress towards or maintenance of goals for medication therapy; whether the physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that 5 of 13 diabetic residents ( #8, #15, #18, #26, and #85) with insulin medications kits located in their rooms were locked; 1 of 2 medication carts were locked; and daily medication refrigerator temperatures were documented. These deficient practices created the potential for harm if residents and unauthorized personnel accessed medications and they became missing or were administered incorrectly, needles were improperly used, or residents received medications with decreased efficacy from not being stored at the correct temperature. Findings include: The facility's policy, Medication Management, revised 10/15/22, directed the staff to ensure Medications and biologicals are stored appropriately according to the manufacturer's guidelines and to prevent unauthorized access. Unlocked medication/treatment carts are always under the nurse control. 1. The following diabetic kits were not securely stored: - On 4/29/24 at 1:10 PM, an unlocked green diabetic kit containing insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This was true for 9 of 9 residents (#2, #5, #26, #81, #83, #84, #133, #135, and #137) observed for enhanced barrier precautions. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: The CDC Website for Long-Term Care Facilities - Frequently Asked Questions about Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated 4/2/24, and accessed on 5/16/24, states: - Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID