No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Colfax Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia

1150 West Fairview Road, Colfax, WA 99111 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 55 certified beds · (509) 397-4603 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0741)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$81,864 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $81,864 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-07)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1200 W Fairview St. · (509) 397-4717 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
825 SW Bishop · (509) 332-4608 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Colfax1.1 mi
632 N. Main Street, Colfax, WA 99111
Park
805 S Meadow St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1018 S Main St · (509) 397-3921

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.1%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.4%17.7%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.6%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.5%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.0%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.6%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine42.2%82.0%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.971.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.401.521.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.2%CMS range 36.7–54.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.9–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.1–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.01
RN hours/ resident / day
0.23
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.92
RN hoursweekends
71.4%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 43.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-14)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-22)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 4 residents who were assessed to smoke independently (Resident 30, 31, 24, and 20) had a designated safe location to smoke, fire-safe receptacle for disposal of cigarette butts, and a system in place to ensure smoking supplies were stored safely. In addition, the facility failed to ensure smoking evaluations were done timely for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 22) reviewed for smoking. These failures, which were exacerbated by hotter than normal temperatures during fire season, placed the facility at risk for fire and all residents at risk for serious injury, harm or death and constituted an immediate Jeapordy (IJ). On 07/10/2024 at 1:58 PM, the facility was notified IJ was identified related to F689 CFR §483.25 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. The facility removed the immediacy on 07/10/2024 with an onsite verification by surveyours ensuring all residents that smoked had a smoking assessment completed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely identify and address a decline in condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) started on a new medication. Resident 1 experienced harm when they had a decline in condition as evidenced by nausea/vomiting, change of level of consciousness, were difficult to arouse, and became unresponsive after starting a new partial opioid (buprenorphine-naloxone (suboxone) - a central nervous system depressant used to treat opioid addiction) medication. Findings included .Review of Resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE], at the age of 54, with diagnoses of diabetes, bilateral below knee amputations, and chronic kidney disease (inability of the kidneys to filter waste effectively).Resident 1's EMR showed on [DATE] at 1:00 PM they saw Collateral Contact 1 (CC1), community primary medical doctor, in their office and were prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone to help with their report of unrelieved nerve pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-07-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical and psychological abuse by another resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 28) reviewed for abuse. Resident 28 experienced psychological as evidenced by a change in behaviors, being up at night, pacing and fear. This failure placed residents at risk for physical and psychological abuse, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Abuse Prevention, Identification and Reporting and Investigating, dated 10/31/2017, directed protocol for Protection of a Patient during an investigation if resident to resident abuse occurred. The policy stated . Residents are separated and supervised to prevent additional contact until the investigation is completed and an intervention plan implemented. Examine of the alleged victim for any signs of injury, including a physical examination and psychosocial assessment as needed. Protect the alleged victim from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided following a decline in function, recent fall from the toilet and recent unconscious episode to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls with injuries. Despite Resident 1's changes in condition their plan of care was not revised to address the need for additional staff supervision with toileting. This failed practice resulted in actual harm to Resident 1 who fell from the toilet after being left unsupervised by staff. Resident 1 sustained multiple facial fractures, skull fracture and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH - bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain) and was hospitalized for nine days. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke, unsteady gait, chronic fatigue, muscle weakness and history of falls. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 08/31/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), received medications as ordered and were free from significant medications errors. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects, and worsening condition. Findings included . Review of Resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes, with bilateral below knee amputations and chronic kidney disease (inability of the kidneys to filter waste effectively). Further review of Resident 1's EMR showed on 03/13/2026 they saw their community medical provider and were prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone (prescription medication primarily used for the treatment of opioid dependence. It is not intended for pain management) to help with their report of unrelieved pain. The dose was documented in the medical provider summary note to be 8 milligrams (mg) - 2 mg sublingual film (placed under the tongue to dissolve): place 0.5 film…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide wound care treatment and address refusal of care for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 4), failed to obtain wound supplies timely for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 5 and 6), and failed to enter orders for wound care for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 3 and 7) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. This failure placed residents at risk for worsening skin conditions.Findings included: <Resident 4> According to Resident 4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a tool for implementing standardized assessment and for facilitating care management in nursing homes), dated 08/15/2025, they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with five ulcers (open wounds) on their lower legs, were at risk for development of further skin issues and had scheduled wound care. According to Resident 4's care plan, dated 08/14/2025, they had actual wounds to bilateral [NAME]'s (lower extremities) and left front thigh folds and rash. Interventions included to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement measures to prevent skin breakdown for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 1), failed to address resident refusal of care and consistently provide wound care for worsening pressure ulcers for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 2), and failed to enter wound care orders timely and collect ordered wound cultures timely for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Failure to implement interventions timely resulted in the development of potentially avoidable pressure ulcers, failure to address refusal of care and provide consistent wound care resulted in worsening pressure ulcers and failure to enter wound care orders timely and collect wound cultures, as ordered, resulted in delayed care of pressure ulcers. Findings included: The website nih.gov - in which nih refers to national institute of health- described the revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel pressure injury staging system and showed a pressure injury is localized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility repeatedly failed to ensure the facility had enough staff to answer resident call lights and attend to resident needs in a timely manner for 7 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7), reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed all residents at risk for potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility assessment, reviewed 09/04/2025, showed the facility had an average daily census of 40 and provided 24-hour nursing care including restorative, therapy, and behavior services. Staffing levels were based on the Washington State minimum standards and/or acuity levels. Daily staffing levels were reviewed daily to ensure sufficient staff were scheduled to meet licensed nurse coverage and meet the state requirement. Staff ratios were additionally reviewed to ensure care was provided to meet the needs of the current resident population. The facility utilized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to repeatedly ensure the facility had enough staff to provide care according to the facility acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and/or care plans for 7 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 98, 195, 14, 20, 28, 10, and 2 ), reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed all residents at risk for potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment reviewed 02/18/2025 showed the facility had an average daily census of 40 and provided 24-hour nursing care including restorative, therapy, and behavior services. Staffing levels were based on the Washington State minimum standards and/or acuity levels. Daily staffing levels were reviewed daily to ensure sufficient staff were scheduled to meet licensed nurse coverage and meet the state requirement. Staff ratios were additionally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure opened dates were placed on food items in the refrigerator and freezer, expired foods were discarded in 2 of 3 refrigerators and in 1 of 1 dry storage areas, and ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored. In addition, the facility further failed to maintain a clean cooking environment. These failures placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings included . <Expired/undated food> During an initial tour of the kitchen on 06/09/2025 at 9:52 AM, the dry storage area revealed two opened cake mixes, a package of opened gyro bread, and a bag of opened tortilla chips with no receive or expiration date, and a container of rice crispies and froot loops cereal that expired 05/07/2025. The first refrigerator in the main kitchen contained two boxes of baking soda that expired on 03/16/2025, a bowl of molded grapes, and a stalk of partially used celery that had no receive or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a resident call light system that was functionable and audible, as required. This failure placed all facility residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . During observation on 06/09/2025 at 11:21 AM, a call light was visibly lit up above a resident room but not audible in the hallway. Similar observations were made at 11:29 AM and 1:34 PM, on 06/10/2025 at 10:58 AM, 12:53 PM, and 2:36 PM, on 06/11/2025 at 8:48 AM, 8:59 AM, 9:07 AM and 9:32 AM. During an interview on 06/10/2025 at 1:07 PM, the Resident Council stated they experienced excessively long call light wait times, sometimes waiting over an hour. During observation and interview on 06/12/2025 at 12:04 PM, Staff F, Maintenance Director, the call light above room [ROOM NUMBER] was lit up as activated outside the resident room but no sound was heard. The call light above room [ROOM NUMBER] was activated, lit up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility repeatedly failed to ensure resident hospital transfer documentation was completed as required to include the basis for hospital transfer, specific resident needs unable to be met by the facility, facility attempts to meet the needs, services available at the receiving facility to meet needs, what information was conveyed to the receiving provider, bed hold offered upon transfer, and notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes who protected and promoted resident rights under federal and state law and regulations) of discharges and/or transfers, as required for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 28, 195, and 44), reviewed for hospitalization . This failure placed residents at risk of potential delays in emergent hospital treatment, potential medical complications, and precluded the residents and/or their representatives to participate in decisions regarding their right to return to the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR, a two-part screening; Level I determined presence of a Severe Mental Illness [SMI] or Developmental Disability. If present, a Level II evaluation by a specialized evaluator determined if nursing home placement was the appropriate level of care, and if behavioral health or other community services were recommended. A Level II was required to be completed prior to nursing home admission) were completed correctly, PASSR Level II were referred for evaluation when indicated, and Level II evaluation recommendations were incorporated into the plan of care, as required for 4 of 6 sample residents (Resident 18, 28, 6, and 30), reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk of behavioral health needs not being met and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Behavioral Health Services, revised April 2025, documented if a resident met criteria…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care-planned restorative interventions and do periodic evaluations of current programs for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 14 and 23), reviewed for restorative services (interventions developed to promote the resident's ability to achieve and maintain optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning). The facility further failed to assess the need for restorative services for a resident (Resident 2). This failure placed the residents at risk for a decline in mobility and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented services offered were based on resident needs. Services regarding mobility and fall prevention included transfers, ambulation, restorative nursing, contracture prevention, and supporting resident independence in doing as much of these activities by themselves. <Resident 14> In an interview on 06/10/2025 at 9:24 AM, Resident 14 stated staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 50 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to evaluate staff competencies in skills and techniques to ensure staff provided necessary care and responded to each resident's individualized needs for 3 of 11 sampled staff (Staff EE, U, and FF), reviewed for nursing services. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or under-qualified care staff, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment reviewed 02/18/2025 showed the facility had an average daily census of 40 and provided 24-hour person-centered direct nursing care including restorative, therapy, and behavior services. The facility utilized temporary contracted staff as needed. Staff competencies were reviewed and determined annually to meet the needs of all residents. The facility additionally provided just in time training for conducting one-on-one training, read and signs, small groups or all staff in-services. Competencies could be verified by skills return demonstration or post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely complete annual staff performance reviews yearly as required and provide education based on the outcome of these reviews for 3 of 5 sampled nursing assistants (Staff I, L, and N), reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or under-qualified care staff, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Staff I> Review of Staff I's, Nursing Assistant (NA), personnel file showed they were hired on 07/16/2021. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found on file. <Staff N> Review of Staff N's, NA, personnel file showed they were hired on 02/01/2022. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found on file. <Staff L> Review of Staff L's, NA, personnel file showed they were hired on 04/04/2023. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found on file. In an interview on 06/13/2025 at 1:54 PM, Staff C, Resident Care Manager, stated they were unsure how often or who completed staff performance evaluations. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate temperature in 1 of 1 medication storage rooms, ensure expired medications were removed from inventory and insulin vials were dated when opened for 1 of 2 medication carts, observed for medication storage. In addition, bottles of a liquid oral narcotic were not monitored for loss or diversion as required. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving less than the optimum dose of their medications, placed the facility at increased risk for potential controlled substance drug diversion and detracted from the facility's ability to promptly identify drug diversion. Findings included . Review of the 11/28/2017, last revised 10/15/2022, policy titled, Medication Management showed medications were discarded by the expiration date unless indicated by the pharmacy and/or manufacturer's instructions to discard sooner, labeled in accordance with facility requirements and State and Federal regulations and stored under proper conditions of sanitation, light, ventilation, segregation, and security. Narcotics…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bedtime snacks were offered to 6 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 18, 26, 7, 11, 20 and 1), interviewed during Resident Council. This failure placed residents at risk for hunger and potential weight loss due to the gap between meals. Findings included . In an interview on 06/09/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident 20 stated snacks were not being stocked. Resident 20 explained they would request a snack around 10:00 PM but staff would tell them the refrigerator was empty. During the Resident Council meeting on 06/10/2025 at 1:07 PM, Resident 18 stated they went without snacks at times. Resident 18 stated the dietary manager had been making snacks but was on vacation. The resident stated applesauce, peaches, and mixed fruit were offered but none were available in the evenings. Residents 26, 7, 11, and 1 all agreed with this information. In an interview on 06/14/2024 at 4:16 AM, Staff U, Registered Nurse, stated they ran out of snacks, but it was much better than it was two months ago. Staff U stated they did not have access to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 28, 42, and 195), reviewed for transfer and discharge. This failure placed residents at risk of having an incomplete medical record, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Discharge and Transfer revised April 2025 showed, a resident's medical record should reflect the basis for transfer and/or discharge and should be documented before or as close as possible to the actual time of transfer or discharge. <Resident 28> According to the 04/04/2025 admission assessment, Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including medically complex conditions. Resident 28 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of April 2025 through May 2025 nursing progress notes showed Resident 28 was transferred to the hospital three times, once on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, use of personal protective equipment such as disposable gowns and gloves when providing high contact types of care for residents with drains, tubes, or colonized with antibiotic resistant bacteria) were implemented when indicated for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 14, 195, 96, and 11) reveiwed, and that hand hygiene and EBP were implemented during 2 of 2 medication administration observations and 1 of 1 wound treatment observations. These failures created risk that antibiotic resistant bacteria were spread from resident to resident, and created potential risk of illness. Findings included . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 07/12/2002 Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, gloves, disposable gowns, eye protection or masks, for example) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms retrieved from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to repeatedly ensure nursing assistants received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training per year, as required to include dementia management, abuse prevention, and caring for individuals with cognitive impairment for 2 of 5 sampled staff (Staff I and L), reviewed for nursing services. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or under-qualified care staff, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. <Staff I> Review of Staff I's, Nursing Assistant (NA), personnel file showed they were hired on 07/16/2021. Review of Staff I's training records showed no documentation they received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training per year as required to include dementia management, abuse prevention, and caring for individuals with cognitive impairment. <Staff L> Review of Staff L's, NA, personnel file showed they were hired on 04/04/2023. Review of Staff L's training records showed no documentation they received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training per year as required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' choices regarding having the hoyer sling (a sling used for a full body mechanical lift transfer) left under them after being transferred into their wheelchairs, for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 10 and 20), reviewed for choices. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving resident specific care, not having their preferences honored, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 10> The 05/08/2025 assessment documented Resident 10 had diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes, and chronic pain. Resident 10 was cognitively intact, able to make their needs known, and required total assistance with transfers. In an observation and interview on 06/09/2025 at 11:49 AM, Resident 10 was observed sitting in their wheelchair with a hoyer sling underneath them. The resident stated they did not like having the sling underneath them because it was uncomfortable and caused pain. A similar observation of Resident 10 with the hoyer sling underneath them was made on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide written information regarding the right to formulate an advance directive (legal document that outlined wishes for medical care if a person was unable to make decisions for themselves) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 195), reviewed for advanced directives. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to exercise their rights, not having their wishes honored, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Advanced Directives/Health Care Decisions dated [DATE] showed, the facility would determine if a resident had executed an advanced directive or had given other instructions to indicate what care he or she desired in case of subsequent incapacity, upon admission. If the resident or their legal representative executed one or more advanced directives, copies would be obtained, incorporated, and maintained in the resident's medical record to be readily retrievable by any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring assistance with their activities of daily living (ADLs), were provided timely assistance according to their needs and preferences for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 10 and 23), reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, Resident 10 was not provided bathing per their preference and Resident 23 was not provided nail care when indicated. This failure put residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 10> The 05/08/2025 admission assessment documented Resident 10 had diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes, and chronic pain. The resident was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance for bathing. In an observation and interview on 06/09/2025 at 11:49 AM, Resident 10 was observed sitting in their wheelchair. The resident stated they did not get their bed baths very often. The 05/02/2025 ADL care plan documented Resident 10 was to be offered a bed bath if they could not tolerate a shower. The Nursing Assistant shower task documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement wound care orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 195), reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. This failure placed residents at risk for wound complications, unidentified skin infections, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 05/29/2025 significant correction assessment, Resident 195 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pelvis (bones at the base of the spine that make up the hips, buttocks and pubic area, between the abdomen and thighs) fractures and muscle weakness. The assessment further showed Resident 195 underwent a major surgical procedure during the prior inpatient hospital stay that required active skilled nursing care and had surgical wounds that required wound care. Resident 195 was cognitively intact and able to clearly verbalize their needs. Review of the 05/21/2025 hospital transfer orders showed Resident 195 had pelvis fractures that were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health care services were provided for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 28 and 18), reviewed for mood and behavior. Resident 28 was not referred for behavioral health support until after they voiced wanting to die, used a dinner knife to inflict injury to their left hand and made stabbing motions to their abdomen which required transport to the hospital, and additionally requested death with dignity (allowing terminally ill individuals to choose when and how they die, often with medical assistance). This failure placed residents at risk of experiencing further decline in their mental well-being, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services revised April 2025 showed, the facility provided appropriate behavioral health services to residents identified through their individualized comprehensive assessment as needing support with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely act upon the pharmacy's monthly drug regimen reviews and/or pharmacist recommendations for identified irregularities for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 6 and 11), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of inadequately monitored medications, potentially unidentified adverse consequences, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Drug Regimen Review revised April 2025 showed, the facility pharmacy was to complete monthly drug regimen reviews to identify irregularities and clinically significant risks and/or actual or potential adverse consequences which may result from or be associated with medication use. The pharmacist was to review each resident's medical record once a month and provide a written report of any irregularities observed to the attending physician, medical director, and chief nursing officer. The policy showed the physician was to respond to irregularities within five business days. The attending physician either…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given their medications as ordered for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 11 and 20) reviewed for medication management. This failure placed residents at risk of exacerbations of their chronic health conditions, and unintended consequences when doses of their medications were omitted. Findings included . <Resident 11> The 05/13/2025 five-day assessment documented Resident 11 had diagnoses including obstructive uropathy (a urinary tract disorder that occurred when urine flow was obstructed) and coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels) and was cognitively intact. The 10/31/2024 care plan documented Resident 11 was incontinent of urine. Staff were instructed to monitor and report to the provider signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI). The 04/11/2022 care plan documented Resident 11 received anticoagulant medication (blood thinning medication) related to a history of a blood clot to their lower extremities. Staff were instructed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-14 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation that facility staff were provided education regarding risks and benefits associated with the COVID-19 (a highly contagious viral illness that caused potential severe illness including possible death) vaccine, that staff were offered the vaccine, and that the COVID-19 vaccine status of staff was maintained for 2 of 2 sampled staff (Staff F and Q) reviewed. This failure placed staff at risk of not receiving vaccination against COVID-19 if desired, or information to determine the vaccine risks and benefits. Findings included . The facility policy COVID-19 Vaccination for Residents and Staff reviewed 06/02/2025 documented residents, their advocates and staff were educated regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. The COVID-19 vaccines are offered to residents and staff, and the administration, education, manufacturer and adverse reactions are documented. If residents or staff have previously received the vaccine, the facility requests documentation to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable homelike environment for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 6, 10 and 23 ), reviewed for environment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were securely stored in 1 housekeeping closet and 1 shower room accessible to Resident 6. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 23's wheelchair was clean and in good repair, and Resident 10's drywall was repaired when needed. This failure placed residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Unsecured Chemicals- Housekeeping Closet> In an observation on 06/09/2025 at 1:46 PM, the housekeeping storage closet on 200-hall was unlocked and able to be opened. The room contained chemicals that were harmful if swallowed or contacted the skin or eyes. No residents were wandering by the room. At 4:08 PM the door was locked. In an interview on 06/09/2025 at 4:10 PM, Staff Q, Registered Nurse, stated the housekeepers were the only people that had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, evaluate and analyze risks, and implement safety interventions to reduce risks and hazards for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2), reviewed for accidents related to substance use disorder. This failure placed residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of Resident 1's electronic medical record showed that they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (a mental health disorder characterized by distortions in thinking, perception, emotions, language, sense of self and behaviour) and psychoactive substance use disorder (uncontrolled use of a substance despite harmful consequences). Review of the Resident's facility care plan did not include interventions for substance use disorder. Further review did not show that the resident was identified by the facility as having this type of disorder, and no evaluation and analysis of risks,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information was accurate upon submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Quarter 1 of 2024 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure caused the CMS to have inaccurate data related to facility staffing levels and had the potneital to impact resident care and services. Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report showed the facility reported data for Quarter 1, 2024 (Janaury 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024) at a level lower than required by mandated staffing levels. During an interview on 11/01/2024 at 2:45 PM, Staff A, Administrator, acknowledged the numbers submitted for Quarter 1 were not accurate due to not properly inputting data for agency staff. Staff A stated the home office submitted the data for the reports. Staff A was working with IT staff to resolve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide care that maintained a resident's dignity for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the resident at risk for psychological harm, worsening skin problems and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke with left sided weakness. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 09/18/2024, showed they had no cognitive impairments. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 03/27/2024, showed the resident was at risk for skin problems due to fragile skin, history of pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin), incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for turning. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 08/16/2024, showed the resident had potential/actual skin impairment due to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, dated and covered, and expired food was discarded on or before the expiration date for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff wore beard covering while preparing and serving food. These failures resulted in risk of food borne illness and diminished quality of life for all residents. In an observation of the facility kitchen on 07/08/2024 at 8:50 AM the following foods were noted in the refrigerators/freezers that were expired and/or past the use by date: -tortillas use by 6/30/2024 -macaroni salad use by 6/30/2024 -salsa use by 6/20/2024 -strawberry yogurt with expiration date of 6/1/2024 In addition, there were open packages of various berries that were not dated, uncovered celery in the refrigerator, and an open undated package of cooked eggs. During an observation of the resident nourishment freezer/refrigerator on 07/15/2024 at 5:00 AM multiple open food packages were observed that were not labeled with a resident name and/or the date opened or use by date. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was implemented timely in accordance with the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Local Health Department for the use of facial coverings after Resident 18 tested positive for COVID-19. This failure placed all residents and staff at risk for contracting COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness caused by a virus, capable of producing severe symptoms and in some cases death, especially in older people and those with underlying health conditions). In addition, failure to ensure PPE was implemented for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 13, 16) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), failure to ensure resident 13's urinary catheter (a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag outside the body) was maintained in a sanitary manner, and failure to ensure hand hygiene was performed during the dining observation placed residents at risk for infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, homelike environment was maintained at the facility for 3 of 3 hallways reviewed. Failure to provide necessary maintenance and repairs in resident rooms and bathrooms, clean dirty carpets, flooring and wheelchairs and address odoriferous non transient odors throughout the building. placed residents at risk for accidents, injuries, unsanitary living conditions and diminished quality of care and life. Findings included . On 07/08/2024, during initial rounds of the building and throughout the survey period (07/08/2024 - 07/12/2024, 07/15/2024 -07/19/2024, and 07/22/2024) multiple resident rooms were observed with gouged walls, chipped paint, holes in the walls, nails on resident room walls with nothing hanging, un-sanded wall patches, cracked damaged blinds with missing slats, hazy windows, window screens clogged with dirt particles, damaged baseboards in resident rooms and bathrooms, and toilets and bathroom sinks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 6 sample residents (28, 35, 40, 14) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, an assessment completed prior to admission into a skilled nursing facility to determine whether a resident with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness needed specialized mental health services) was completed prior to admission, accurately, and if indicated, a referral for a PASARR Level II (a more in-depth screening assessment) had been made. this faliure placed residents at risk on unmet care needs. Findings included <Resident 35> The 04/23/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 35 had diagnoses which included depression, psychotic disorder, a severe mental illness that caused abnormal thinking, delusions and hallucinations. Review of Resident 35's record showed a PASSAR was completed on 12/28/2023 prior to the resident's admission to the facility, but Section 1A documented the resident had no serious mental illness indicators and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing and/or grooming for 13 of 16 sampled residents (17, 18, 8, 1, 16, 13, 36, 39, 294, 33, 22, 14, 34) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed the residents at risk for poor personal hygiene, diminished quality of life and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 1> The 05/10/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 1 had bladder and bowel incontinence and needed assistance from nursing staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) for bathing and shaving. On 07/08/2024 at 12:36 PM, Resident 1 was observed sitting in their wheelchair. The resident had long facial hair on the chin and upper lip. Review of the 06/18/2020 ADL care plan documented Resident 1 needed assistance for bathing, and preferred to have two showers a week. Instructions to nursing staff were added on 02/28/2023 to inform staff that Resident 1 needed assistance with shaving of facial hair and to reapproach if they refused. Additional observations of Resident 1 with facial hair on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 nursing assistants (Staff V,W) met competency requirements defined under State Law, for license and certification. This failure placed residents at risk to receive care from incompetent and unlicensed staff. Findings included: Record review of employee files on 07/22/2024 documented Staff V was hired as a nursing assistant on 04/01/2024. Documentation in the file revealed that Staff V had a nursing assistant license that was pending. Staff V was observed in the facility on 07/09/2024, 07/11/2024 and 07/16/2024 providing care and services to the residents. Record review of employee files on 07/22/2024 documented Staff W was hired as a nursing assistant on 05/01/2024. Documentation in the file revealed that Staff W had a nursing assistant license that was pending. Staff W was observed in the facility on 07/08/2024, 07/09/2024, 07/11/2024, 07/12/2024, and 07/13/2024 providing care and services to the residents. In an interview on 07/22/2024 at 2:30 PM, Staff X, Administrator from a sister facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 8 sampled staff received mandated training on dementia and behavioral health. This failure placed the residents at risk for having unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of competency training records for Staff W, Nursing Assistant, Staff BB, Cook, Staff JJ, Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff KK, Registered Nurse and Staff LL, Registered Nurse revealed they had not received any training on dementia and behaviors. During an interview on 07/22/2024 at 3:54 PM, Staff C, Clinical Resource Nurse, stated dementia and behavior training was important so that staff could meet the needs of the residents and should be offered to new employees and annually thereafter. Review of the 2024 Facility Assessment Tool provided by the facility documented training requirements included full time, part time and contracted staff. No Associated WAC

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided in a dignified manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 13), reviewed for use and care of a urinary catheter (a flexible tube that passes through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine). This failure placed the resident at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per review of the 05/27/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 13 had diagnoses which included neurogenic bladder, (a condition in which one lacked bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve problem), and utilized a urinary catheter. On 07/08/2024 at 09:03 AM, Resident 13 was observed asleep in their bed. The urine collection bag of their catheter was attached to the bed, not covered by a privacy bag. Additional observations of the collection bag without a privacy bag were observed on 07/08/2024 at 2:38 PM, 07/10/2024 at 4:52 PM, 07/11/2024 at 9:06 AM AND 11:31AM, 07/12/2024 at 9:11 AM, 07/15/2024 at 4:26 AM AND 7:33 AM, and 07/16/2024 at 10:41 AM, 11:48 AM, 12:36 PM and 1:50 PM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 24) reviewed for accommodation of need, was provided a bariatric commode. This failure to ensure the resident received appropriate toileting equipment in their room placed them at risk for diminished independent functioning, and a loss of dignity and comfort. Findings included . Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] (age 39) with diagnoses to include obesity and a history of falls. The 07/03/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required stand by to partial assist with activities of daily living and used a mechanical lift as needed for transfers. The assessment showed the resident was oriented and able to make their needs known and used a motorized wheelchair for mobility. During an interview on 07/08/2024 at 3:30pm, Resident 24 stated that they needed a large bedside commode because the bathroom in their room was too small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform and provide written information concerning the right of their residents to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 17, 33) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to exercise their rights and not having their wishes honored. Findings included . <Resident 17> A review of the record documented Resident 17 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A 04/29/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 17 had diagnoses which included a stroke, lung disease and depression. Resident 17's record did not contain documentation that they had been informed of their right to form an advance directive or if they had accepted assistance in forming one until 06/02/2024, more than four months after admission to the facility. <Resident 33> A review of the record documented Resident 33 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A 07/25/24 quarterly assessment documented Resident 33 had diagnoses which included heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were identified as such and reported to the State Survey Agency as required for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 28, 40) reviewed for abuse. Failure to report an allegation of abuse by Resident 14 towards Resident 28, and failure to identify and report resident to resident altercations involving Resident 40 as potential abuse, placed the residents at risk for additional abuse, unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility Abuse Prevention, Identification and Reported facility procedures revised 10/31/17 showed the facility procedures for reporting abuse: All staff members in all departments are required to immediately report any allegation of abuse to their direct supervisor and the State Survey Agency If their direct supervisor is not available report to the floor supervisor, CNO or CEO. You must speak with someone Facilities have two hours to notify state agencies and law enforcement if indicated so report to your supervisor immediately. Staff are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 28, 40) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for not being adequately protected from additional episodes of abuse, unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility Abuse Prevention, Identification & Reporting procedure dated 10/31/2017, directed staff to initiate investigations as soon as a report of abuse was received to rule out or identify abuse. Investigations would be completed within five days. On 07/08/24 at 9:37am. Resident 28 stated .A resident slapped me on the a I filed a police report . During an interview on 07/08/2024 at 10:22 AM, Resident 14 stated, I hit her on the butt. and identified Staff J, Maintenance/Transportation, witnessed it. The resident stated after the incident, they were directed by the police not to do that again, and by staff, not to inflame the situation with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care planning. Failure to ensure fall interventions for Resident 1 were followed. this failure placed the residents at risk for injury, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> The 5/10/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 1 had diagnoses which included dementia, and was dependent on nursing staff for transferring to/from the wheelchair to bed. The assessment also documented the resident had weakness, was unsteady on their feet, and had a history of falling. On 07/08/2024 at 2:49 PM, Resident 1 was observed sleeping in bed in their room. A sign on the wall above the bed instructed staff, DO NOT leave resident alone in room. Transfer immediately or leave in common area. Thanks! Review of Resident 1's fall/safety care plan documented the resident was at high risk for falls and interventions were implemented on 11/21/2019. A revision of the care plan on 10/25/2023 informed staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and observations, during the medication cart review, the facility failed to provide timely administration of prepared medications according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors and decreased quality of life. According to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, a delay between preparation and administration of a medication or the preparation of multiple medications for different clients is a contributing factor to medication errors and a risk to patient safety. (ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin - Volume 23 o Issue 12 o December 19, 2023, Pre-pouring Medications: A Risky Approach) Findings included: During an inspection of the 100-hall medication cart on 07/22/2024 at 4:28 PM with Staff R, Medication Technician, eight medication cups, each labeled with a different resident's name, and containing medications and were observed in the top drawer of the cart. In an interview on 07/22/2024 at 4:28 PM Staff R, said they prepared the 2:00pm medications but could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement bowel management protocol when indicated for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 26), reviewed for constipation. These failures placed residents at risk for complications, worsening conditions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Bowel Protocol, instructed nursing staff to implement the bowel program if a resident did not have a bowel movement (BM) for 72 hours. The policy documented nursing staff was to administer Milk of Magnesia (MOM) or Miralax on the evening shift of 72 hours with no BM, a suppository on the following night shift, and an enema on the following day shift. Per the 05/24/2024 assessment, Resident 26 was cognitively intact, required maximum assistance for moving in bed, transfers, and toileting, and had diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a disease that affects the brain and spinal cord and causes nerve damage and communication problems), hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis affecting one side of the body), and depression. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained accurate and timely weights 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for nutrition. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in a resident's condition (Resident 17) that impacted their nutrition. These failures placed the residents at risk for unrecognized, unplanned, significant weight loss, and nutritional complications. Findings included . <Resident 1> The 05/10/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 1 had diagnoses which included dementia, malnutrition, depression, vascular dementia, nutritional deficiency, mild protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident 1's nutritional care plan documented the resident had an increased nutritional risk and interventions were implemented on 11/14/2019. A revision on 12/04/2023 instructed nursing staff to weigh the resident weekly. On 02/22/2024, a nutrition progress note by Staff RR documented the resident weighed 129.4 pounds which was a significant weight gain of 19.4 pounds (lbs.) in 16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had current and complete oxygen orders and failed to ensure that oxygen equipment was maintained in a clean manner for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 16, 39, 14, 27) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for respiratory complications and infection. Findings included . A facility policy, dated 08/04/2023, titled Oxygen Therapy documented orders for oxygen were to be verified prior to initiating oxygen therapy. In addition, the policy documented to change disposable oxygen equipment routinely per manufacturer directives and PRN (as needed) soiling. <Resident 39> Per the 06/20/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 39 had diagnoses which included COPD (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), chronic respiratory failure and needed oxygen due to those conditions. Review of the physician orders documented on 07/01/2024, the resident had been prescribed oxygen to maintain oxygen saturations between 88 and 98 percent,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide person-centered pain management for 1 of 2 sampled resident (Resident 294). Resident 294 was not offered pain medication and non-pharmacological pain interventions, non-pharmacological interventions were not documented when they were administered and failed to notify the physician and request additional pain management interventions. These failures placed the resident at risk for increased pain and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Per the 06/25/2024 comprehensive assessment, Resident 294 had diagnoses which included a stroke, sacral ulcer (pressure sore near the lower back and spine) and quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms and legs) due to a motor vehicle accident. In addition, the assessment showed the resident was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding their care, exhibited verbal and physical aggressive behaviors and was dependent for all cares. Review of the June 2024 and July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed physician orders to administer scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 28) Failure to assist with discharge planning placed resident at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included: The resident admitted to the facility in May 2023. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/30/2024, revealed they did not have any cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated resident 28 had behaviors, the facility coded her behaviors did not significantly intrude on the privacy or activity of others, and that the behaviors did not significantly disrupt care or living environment. The MDS indicated she was independent with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) to include, bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on/off unit, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. On 07/08/2024 at 2:42pm, Resident 28 stated she would like to be living somewhere else. When asked if she was getting assistance with finding alternate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 1 of 1 medication storage rooms. The facility further failed to ensure narcotics were locked in a permanently affixed narcotic container in 1 of 1 medication storage room refrigerators. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication and placed the facility at risk for potential diversion or misappropriation of narcotic medications. Findings included . During an observation of the medication storage room on 07/15/2024 at 7:45 AM with Staff, AA, Registered Nurse (RN), the refrigerator contained influenza vaccines that had expired on 06/30/2024 and Tuberculin (used to check for tuberculosis) that was opened on 04/27/2024 and not discarded after 30 days as required. The medication refrigerator held a white box, which was used to store narcotic medication, and was not locked as required. During an interview on 07/22/2024 at 5:49 PM, Staff B, Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to implement their respiratory protection program for fit testing procedures which included a medical evaluation, fit testing (a 20 to 30 minute procedure to ensure a proper seal between the respirator face piece and the staff member's face) and training on the use and wearing of the respirator mask) of the N95 respirator mask (respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) for staff. The facility had not implemented the respiratory protection program for 4 of 5 staff (Staff A, B, C, D) every year within 12 months of the date of the last fit test. A COVID-19 (infectious disease by a new virus causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, or new dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak began in the facility on 06/17/2024 with 10 residents and 12 staff testing positive for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to perform thorough assessments, evaluate for changes in condition and notify the physician following significant changes in condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for assessments. This failed practice placed Resident 1 at risk for a delay in medical treatment and medical complications. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke with right sided weakness, aphasia (language disorder that affected a person's ability to communicate), diabetes and heart disease. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 03/22/2024, showed they had severe cognitive impairment and was independent with all activities of daily living. Review of physician's orders showed Eliquis (blood thinner medication) was ordered on 11/14/2023 to treat Resident 1's heart disease. Review of Resident 1's April 2024 Treatment Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure timely physician visits were completed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for physician visits. This failure placed residents at risk of being denied face-to-face contact with a physician, comprehensive reviews and physician assessments of their health and well-being. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke with right sided weakness, diabetes and heart disease. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 03/22/2024, showed severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician's assessments showed the last visit by a physician was on 11/22/2023 (slightly over five months ago). On 05/03/2024 at 2:06 PM, Staff A, Medical Director, stated they took over as the facility Medical Director in December 2023 as the previous Medical Director retired that month. Staff A stated they thought Resident 1 was being seen by an outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to timely complete, thoroughly investigate and provide prompt resolutions for concerns brought forth to staff by residents and/or their representatives individually or during the Resident Council Meeting for March 2024 for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 2, 4 and 5) reviewed for grievances. There was no documentation staff informed residents of the corrective actions taken, if any, to address their reported concerns. These failures prevented the facility from ensuring residents' concerns were timely and effectively addressed, care trends were identified and placed all residents at risk of frustration, diminished self worth, unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 03/21/2024 Resident Council Minutes showed 16 residents attended the meeting. Residents voiced concerns that call lights were not being answered promptly by staff. The meeting was facilitated by Staff H, Activities Director (AD). <Resident 5>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living relative to bathing for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 1 and 2) dependent on staff for bathing. This failed practice placed residents at risk for embarrassment, poor hygiene, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 03/29/2024, showed they had no cognitive impairments. Review of the 03/27/2024 plan of care showed Resident 1 required partial and/or moderate assistance by staff with bathing. On 04/05/2024 at 10:30 AM, Resident 1 stated they had not been bathed by staff since they were admitted to the facility (10 days prior). They stated they were very frustrated and were not even on a bathing schedule yet. On 04/05/2024 at 2:30 PM, Staff A, Director of Nursing, stated they were unable to locate any bathing records on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations of abuse immediately to administrative staff, and as mandatory reporters to the State Survey Agency as required, which caused a delay in investigating alleged staff to resident abuse for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse reporting. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of protection from being abused and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, Identification, & Reporting, revised on 10/31/2017, showed all staff members in all departments are required to immediately report any allegation of abuse to their direct supervisor. Abuse is not determined by the staff member to whom the allegation was made. If their direct supervisor is not available, report to the floor supervisor, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) or Chief Executive Officer (CEO). You must speak with someone, a written note left for a supervisor is not immediate .call.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment and to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food services. Failure to ensure food was stored and served in a sanitary manner as well as maintaining a sanitary kitchen environment placed all residents at risk for cross-contamination (physical spread of germs), food borne illnesses and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, dated 11/28/2017, showed all food, non-food items, and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to maintain safety and sanitation of the food or supply for human consumption as set forth in the Federal Drug Administration Food Code, state regulations, and city/county health codes. For food products that are opened and not completely used or prepared at facility and stored, the product should be labeled as to its contents and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to prepare palatable (acceptable/appetizing) meals for 6 of 9 residents (Resident 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) reviewed for food service. This failure placed the residents at risk for a diminished dining experience, dissatisfaction with food served and a potential for less than adequate nutritional intake leading to weight loss. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of Resident 2's comprehensive assessment, dated 07/19/2023, showed they had no cognitive impairments (thinking, reasonng, remembering). During an interview with Resident 2 on 10/12/2023 at 2:30 PM, they stated on 10/10/2023 they had burnt toast and a burned fried egg, which was not even recognizable. On 10/11/2023 they received the first food tray out of the food cart (eats in room) and the breakfast meal was so cold they would not eat it. They stated the dinner meal on 10/10/2023 was a cold hamburger patty. The slice of cheese was not on the patty and the hamburger was stuck to the plate. On 10/01/2023 Resident 2 received a fried egg on their plate for breakfast that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required transfer notices to 4 of 4 sample residents (6, 8, 18, 30), reviewed for hospitalization. The facility failed to provide the resident and/or their representative a written notice at the time the resident was transferred to the hospital, and failed to send a copy of the notice to the Ombudsman as required. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer & Discharge with a revision date of 10/15/2022, showed, .1. For exceptions to the 30-day notice rule, notice is given as soon as practicable. m. Sends a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. 4. At the time of transfer/ discharge, the resident and a family member or legal representative are given written notice. Resident 6 Review of Resident 6's electronic medical record showed they were originally admitted to the facility in April 2021, and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the electronic progress notes showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required bed-hold notices for 4 of 4 sample residents (6, 8, 18, 30), reviewed for hospitalization. The facility failed to provide a written copy of a bed-hold notice prior to or within 24-hours of transfer to the hospital. This failure created the potential for residents and responsible parties to not have the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer & Discharge with a revision date of 10/15/2022, showed, .4. At the time of transfer/discharge, the resident and family member or legal representative are given a written notice of the bed-hold policy that specifies the duration of the bed-hold and readmission criteria after the bed-hold period ends. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed-Hold Readmission, released 11/28/2017, showed, The facility issues two notices related to bed-hold policies . b. The second notice is provided to the resident, and if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one staff member disinfected a multi-use glucometer (a small, portable machine used to measure how much glucose - a type of sugar - is in the blood), per manufacturer's instructions between uses for one of three sample residents (11), observed receiving finger stick blood glucose tests. This failure had the potential to spread bloodborne pathogens during finger-stick blood glucose checks between three residents who shared the glucometer. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Work Practices- Cleaning, dated 01/01/2018 showed, . 2. Resident care items are cleaned, disinfected or sterilized according to manufacturer's instructions. b. Multiple use resident care items are properly cleaned/disinfected between each resident use (. germicidal agent recommended by manufacturer's instructions). Resident care items may include, but is not limited to: 1) Glucometer. Review of the undated manufacturing instructions for the blood glucose monitoring system showed on page 44, Cleaning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$81,864 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-04-07
  • $39,867 — penalty dated 2024-06-28
  • $27,617 — penalty dated 2023-10-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Caldwell Care of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 1 of 5Cascadia of BoiseBoise, ID 1 of 5Cherry Ridge of CascadiaEmmett, ID 1 of 5Coeur d Alene Health of CascadiaCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Colville Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColville, WA 1 of 5Curry Village Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBrookings, OR 1 of 5Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 1 of 5Mount Ascension Transitional Care Of CascadiaHelena, MT 1 of 5Orchards of Cascadia, TheNampa, ID 1 of 5Spokane Valley Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadSpokane Valley, WA 1 of 5Teton Healthcare of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 2 of 5Cascadia of NampaNampa, ID 2 of 5Royal Plaza Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaLewiston, ID 2 of 5Salem Transitional CareSalem, OR 2 of 5Secora Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPortland, OR 2 of 5Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaSnohomish, WA 3 of 5Arbor Valley of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Brookfield Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBattle Ground, WA 3 of 5Clarkston Health And Rehab Of CascadiaClarkston, WA 3 of 5Clearwater Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaOrofino, ID 3 of 5Highland Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 3 of 5Northpark Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPhoenix, AZ 3 of 5Shaw Mountain of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Weiser Care of CascadiaWeiser, ID 4 of 5Canyon West of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 4 of 5Cascadia of LewistonLewiston, ID 4 of 5Cove of Cascadia, TheBellevue, ID 4 of 5Grangeville Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaGrangeville, ID 4 of 5Lewiston Transitional Care of CascadiaLewiston, ID 4 of 5Mountain Valley of CascadiaKellogg, ID 4 of 5Paradise Creek Health and Rehab of CascadiaMoscow, ID 4 of 5Stafholt Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBlaine, WA 4 of 5Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaNampa, ID 5 of 5Alderwood Park Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 5 of 5Aspen Park of CascadiaMoscow, ID 5 of 5Bend Transitional CareBend, OR 5 of 5Boswell Transitional Care Of CascadiaSun City, AZ 5 of 5Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaEugene, OR 5 of 5Fairlawn Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaGresham, OR 5 of 5Hudson Bay Health And RehabilitationVancouver, WA

Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASCADIA WASHINGTON OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2022
CASCADIA HC GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2022
CASCADIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
HAMMOND, OWENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
LAFORTE, STEPHENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
NELSON, TIMOTHYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
TIMBERLINE OHI TENANT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/01/2022
CASCADIA SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022
GUNKEL, BOBBIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
STROBEL, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-27.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$258K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 18%Other / private 19%

This home reported $258K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$547per resident / day
operating cost
$16,643per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$431per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505251. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next