Shaw Mountain of Cascadia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-02-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a lap tray was used to treat a medical symptom and not used as a physical restraint for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #78) who was observed for use of restraints. This resulted in harm to Resident #78 was left in a wheelchair with a lap tray for long periods which resulted in skin impairment and psychosocial distress. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior), anxiety disorder, and malnutrition. Resident #78's admission MDS assessment, dated 12/9/23, documented she was severely cognitively impaired with unclear speech and rarely/never understood others. The assessment documented Resident #78 was dependent on eating and personal hygiene assistance and required maximal assistance for upper body dressing, sitting to standing, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident for two residents (Resident (R) 70) and R110) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 26. R10 touched R70's breast and R10 touched R110's breast. This failure had the potential to negatively affect R70 and R110's overall physical and mental health. Findings include: 1. Review of R70's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated that resident (R) 70 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with severe dementia and schizophrenia. Review of R70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/09/26, revealed R70 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of two out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. During an attempted interview 05/10/26 at 11:50 AM, R70 was alert yet confused, mumbling as she colored and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure two abuse allegations were reported within two hours to the State Agency for two of three residents (Resident (R) 70 and R110) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 26 residents. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the facility by not making the State Agency aware of the situation timely.Findings include: 1. Review of R70's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that resident (R) 70 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe dementia and schizophrenia. Review of R70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/09/26, revealed R70 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of two out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Attempted to interview R70 on 05/10/26 at 11:50 AM; however, R70 was alert yet confused, mumbling as she colored…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level one screen was updated with a new major mental illness diagnosis for one of two residents (Resident (R) 19) reviewed for PASARR out of a total of 26 sample residents. This created a potential failure to identify what specialized or rehabilitative services the resident needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate. Findings include: Review of R19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/30/26, revealed R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, which indicated R19 had sever cognitive deficits. Per the MDS, R19 had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Review of R19's Idaho Preadmission Screening and Review (PASRR) Level 1 HW00087, dated 03/19/26 and located in the EMR under the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in a sanitary manner for one resident of two residents (Resident (R) 67) reviewed for respiratory care out of a total sample of 26. This failure had the potential to expose the resident to infections. Findings include:Review of R67's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and unspecified dementia. Review of R67's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/20/26, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15, which indicated R61 had intact cognition. Review of R67's Care Plan Report, located in the EMR under Care Plans tab, revealed a focus dated 12/27/24 which indicated R67 had terminal prognosis due to COPD. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies during wound care when staff failed to wear a gown for one resident (Resident (R) 36) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and failed to implement EBP for one resident (R92) with open wounds requiring dressing changes of three residents observed for wound care in a total sample of 26 residents. The deficient practice increased the risk for cross contamination and infections. Findings include:1. Review of R36's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R36 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/16/26 revealed R36 had a Brief Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccines based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for one of five residents (Resident (R) 51) reviewed for immunizations out of a total of 26 sample residents. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk for this resident to contract pneumonia. Findings include:Review of R51's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and history of malignant neoplasm of breast. R51 was over [AGE] years of age. Review of R51's Immunizations, located under the Immunizations tab, and Immunization Record, located under the Documents tab, in the EMR revealed R51 had received PPSV23 (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine) on 06/07/04 and Prevnar 13 (also known as PCV13, a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) on 11/04/14. R51 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This was true for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #4,) whose records were reviewed for quality of care. This failure created the potential for harm when residents were not reassessed to ensure the plan of care was effective, when physician orders were conflicting, and physician orders were not implemented or followed when ordered. Findings include:1.The American Heart Association website accessed 12/30/25, documented the following blood pressure categories: Normal: less than 120/ less than 80 Elevated: 120-129/ less than 80 Stage 1 hypertension: 130-139/ 80-89 Stage 2 hypertension: 140 or higher / 90 or higher Severe hypertension: Higher than 180 / higher than 120 Hypertensive emergency Higher than 180/ higher than 120 a) Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were on-site to provide nursing services. This failure had the potential to affect all residents living in the facility and placed them at risk for harm if their call lights were not able to be answered in a timely manner or care was not provided due to not having adequate numbers of staff. Findings include:The facility Grievance Log was reviewed for July-December 2025, and documented the following:On 8/8/25, a resident reported long call light wait times. The facility completed call light audits and staff were provided education to answer call lights in a timely manner. On 8/15/25, a resident reported they were left soiled for 2 hours while their call light was on, once staff responded they seemed hurried. The facility provided one to one training to the CNA for answering call lights.On 8/22/25, a resident reported they used their call light for incontinence care, a CNA responded and turned off the call light, then said they would come help them with a shower, then did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #4) whose records were reviewed for accuracy of resident records. This failure resulted in inaccurate clinical documentation. Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for care following sepsis (a life-threatening, extreme response to an infection that causes the immune system to damage the body's own organs and tissues) and multiple abscesses (pus-filled infected pockets of fluid) of his liver. Upon his admission, Resident #4 had 3 drain tubes surgically placed in his abdomen to drain waste from the liver abscesses into collection bags outside his body. On 3/14/25, a drain check note from Interventional Radiology documented: Drain #1 was removed, drain #2 and #3 remain in place, re-check tubes in 7 to 10 days On 3/21/25, a drain check note from Interventional Radiology…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the State Operations Manual, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained when 1) staff was assisting residents with meals and 2) medication administration, and 3) unsanitary conditions in the laundry room. This failure had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, updated 8/8/24, documented failure to change gloves and wash hands between tasks, such as medical treatments or contact with residents .can contribute to cross-contamination. The facility policy, Dining Standards, updated 9/10/20, documented staff was to complete hand hygiene using soap and water at the beginning of meal service and are to sanitize hands when changing tasks or assisting different residents. The following issue were observed in the dining room; On 3/3/25 at 8:37 AM, CNA #5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,839 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-02-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $603K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID