No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cherry Ridge of Cascadia

501 West Idaho Boulevard, Emmett, ID 83617 · For profit - Corporation · 40 certified beds · (208) 664-8128 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (208) 664-8128 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
119 N Wardwell Ave · (208) 365-6311 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
184 W Highway 52 · (208) 365-4327 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
300 S Washington Ave · (208) 398-8315 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
498 W Idaho Blvd · (208) 365-0991

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.3%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%15.1%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.0%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.4%16.1%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.8%16.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.2%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.9%20.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.8%1.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 31.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-10)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-08-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the State Survey Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, hospital record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was followed to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #10) whose records were reviewed for falls. This failure harmed Resident #10 when she suffered fractures to her right lower leg after a fall from her bed. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (an irreversible condition in which the body's immune system attacks the central nervous system), and Alzheimer's disease. On 8/8/22, Resident #10's care plan documented she required total assistance for transfers with two staff and a mechanical lift. On 8/14/22, Resident #10's care plan documented an intervention was initiated to use fall mats on the right side of the bed and to have her bed in the lowest position. On 10/1/22, Resident #10's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the SOM, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the designated Culinary Manager met the required professional qualifications for overseeing food and nutrition services. This failure had the potential to impact all residents receiving meals and nutrition services. Findings include:The SOM, Appendix PP, revised 7/23/25, documented, if a qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is not employed full-time, the facility must designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. The director of food and nutrition services must at a minimum meet one of the following qualifications:-A certified dietary manager.-A certified food service manager, or-has similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body; or-Has an associate's or higher degree in food service management or in hospitality, if the course study includes food service or restaurant management, from an accredited institution of higher learning; or-Has 2 or more years…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the FDA Food Code, review of the SOM, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 1) the kitchen cooking hood was kept clean, 2) food items were free from mold, 3) personal staff beverages were stored in a manner to prevent contamination, 4) kitchen staff performed proper hand hygiene, 5) required food and refrigerator temperatures were recorded to ensure safe hot-holding and cold-holding of Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods. These failures placed all residents who consumed meals prepared by the facility at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:1.The FDA Food Code Section 6-501.14 (A) documented cleaning ventilation systems intake and exhaust air ducts shall be cleaned so they are not a source of contamination by dust, dirt, and other materials.On 7/10/26 at 9:43 AM, the gray kitchen cooking hood vent was observed with a layer of brown particles on the outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee policy, the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure good faith efforts were made to implement and monitor performance improvement activities related to skin assessments and food sanitation. This failure created the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility and receive nursing services or consume food provided by the facility. Findings include:The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee Policy, revised 9/1/25, documented that the committee identifies performance improvement opportunities through tracking and trending of data.The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan, dated 4/1/26, documented the organization will continue to monitor progress toward goals by comparing results to benchmarks and historical performances.On 7/10/26 at 3:47 PM, the CEO stated he had three performance improvement plans (PIPs). When asked about PIP #1, he stated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were informed in advance of the care and treatment to be furnished, including the risks and benefits of treatment. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #23) whose records were reviewed for informed consent. This failure created the potential for miscommunication and adverse effects when Resident #23 was not informed in advance of the risks and benefits of his ordered medication. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Resident #23's record included the following physician orders:-Seroquel (antipsychotic) Extended-Release 200 mg by mouth at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder, initiated on 3/11/26.-Seroquel 100 mg by mouth once a day for bipolar disorder, initiated on 3/12/26.-Lorazepam (anti anxiety) 2 mg/mL give 0.5 mL by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights are within their reach. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #38) reviewed for residents' rights. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if the resident could not call for assistance when needed or experienced an adverse medical event that required attention. Findings include:Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acute cystitis (bladder infection) with hematuria (presence of red blood cells in the urine), diabetes, and cirrhosis (advance scarring of the liver caused by chronic diseases) of the liver.On 7/10/26 at 9:14 AM as three surveyors were passing by Resident #38's room, Resident #38 asked one of the surveyors to call a staff member. Resident #38 was sitting in the chair with the front wheel walker in front of her. When asked where her call light was, Resident #38 extended her arm toward her call light which was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the State Operations Manual (SOM), record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a copy of a resident's advance directive was maintained in the medical record. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #32) whose records were reviewed for advanced directives. The absence of the advance directive created the potential for an adverse outcome if Resident #32 became unable to communicate treatment preferences and those preferences were not available to guide care. Findings include: The SOM, Appendix PP, defines an advance directive as a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law . relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. The Manual further clarifies that a Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form is a portable medical order communicating a patient's treatment preferences during a medical emergency, based on the patient's current medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with an appropriate clinical indication. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The lack of an appropriate indication created the potential for chemical restraint use and improper medication administration. Findings include:Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including COPD, anxiety, and PTSD.Resident #23's care plan, revised 5/27/26, documented, give medications as ordered by physician.A review of Resident #23's physician orders documented, Lorazepam 2 mg/mL, 0.5 mL by mouth every 4 hours as needed, ordered for palliative care related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, initiated on 6/29/26.On 7/9/26 at 2:45 PM, the CNO reviewed the lorazepam order and stated the indication should be shortness of breath or anxiety.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation was reported to the State Agency as required. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #23) reviewed for misappropriation. This failure created the potential for poor communication and continued misappropriation of resident funds. Findings include:Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including COPD, anxiety, and PTSD.On 7/7/26 at 10:39 AM, Resident #23 stated that approximately two months prior, he reported $1,600.00 missing to the Social Services Director (SSD). He stated he told the SSD he believed another resident had taken the money. Resident #23 stated the SSD asked, How long ago did it happen? and when Resident #23 responded about one and a half months ago, the SSD told him it had been too long ago to investigate.On 7/9/26 at 1:42 PM, a call was made to the SSD for interview, with no response.On 7/10/26 at 10:40 AM, the CNO stated she recalled a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation was investigated as required. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #23) reviewed for misappropriation. This failure created the potential for continued misappropriation of resident funds. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including COPD, anxiety, and PTSD.On 7/7/26 at 10:39 AM, Resident #23 stated that approximately two months prior, he reported $1,600.00 missing to the SSD. He stated he told the SSD he believed another resident had taken the money. Resident #23 stated the SSD asked, How long ago did it happen? and when Resident #23 responded about one and a half months ago, the SSD told him it had been too long ago to investigate.On 7/8/26 at 2:31 PM, the facility's grievance records dated February 2026 through June 2026 were reviewed. No allegations of misappropriation involving Resident #23 were documented.On 7/8/26 at 2:46…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a written notice of discharge was provided to 1 of 3 residents (Resident #37) whose records were reviewed for discharges and transfers. This failure created the potential for Resident #37 to be without access to discharge information or appeal advocacy resources. Findings include: Review of the facility's Discharge or Transfer policy, revised 8/30/25 documented: Notice of Transfer or Discharge1. The facility must provide the resident, the resident's representative (if any), and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman with a written notice at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged , except when:a.The resident's safety or the safety of others would be endangered by remaining in the facility;b.The resident's health has improved sufficiently to allow a more immediate discharge;c.The resident's urgent medical needs require an immediate transfer; ord.The facility ceases to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person centered care plan as written. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #32) whose record was reviewed for care plan implementation. This failure created the potential for Resident #32 to develop pressure injuries and adverse outcomes when his heels were not offloaded as directed by his care plan. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and protein calorie malnutrition.A review of Resident #32's care plan, revised 6/18/21, directed staff to offload Resident #32's heels or use Prevalon boots when in bed, as he allowed.On 7/9/26 at 11:22 AM, Resident #32 was observed in bed without Prevalon boots in place.On 7/9/26 at 11:23 AM, LPN #2 stated Resident #32 should have his boots on. LPN #2 lifted the blanket and observed Resident #32's legs resting on a pillow. When asked if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's medications were administered according to professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #30) whose medication was reviewed and true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #9) whose medication administration was observed. This failed practice created the potential for Resident #30 to receive improper treatment, skin irritation, allergic reaction, or other adverse outcomes and created the potential for Resident #9 to not receive the full dose of their prescribed eye drops. Findings include: 1. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and adult failure to thrive. On 7/7/26 at 10:58 AM, CNA #2 was observed assisting Resident #30 with activities of daily living (ADLs). CNA #2 stated Resident #30 had redness to her lower abdomen and under her breasts. CNA #2 stated she assisted Resident #30 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure podiatry treatment orders and care plan interventions were implemented as written. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #32) reviewed for podiatry services. This failure created the potential for untreated foot conditions, discomfort, and deterioration of skin integrity due to the lack of required podiatry services. Findings include:Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and protein calorie malnutrition.A review of Resident #32's care plan, initiated 4/11/24, directed staff to provide podiatry evaluation and treatment as needed.On 7/9/26 at 11:25 AM, LPN #2 removed Resident #32's socks and stated his toenails needed to be trimmed. When describing the toenails, LPN #2 stated they were chunky, yellow, and irregular.On 7/9/26 at 11:34 AM, LPN #2 stated Resident #32 was on the podiatry list to be seen every three months.A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring was conducted to identify potential catheter associated urinary tract infections. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for catheter care. This failure created the potential for undetected signs of infection if Resident #32 was not monitored for appropriate symptoms. Findings include:Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and protein calorie malnutrition.A review of Resident #32's physician order, dated 2/14/25, directed staff to monitor, record, and report to the provider signs and symptoms of catheter associated urinary tract infection, including: pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, deepening of urine color, increased pulse, increased temperature, urinary frequency, foul smelling urine, fever, chills, altered mental status, changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure an oxygen concentrator was removed from the resident's room after the physician discontinued the resident's oxygen order. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #12) whose oxygen concentrator was observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if the resident attempted to use the oxygen equipment without a valid physician order. Findings include:The facility's Oxygen Administration, Safety, Storage & Maintenance policy revised 10/10/25, documented the facility would administer, store, and maintain supplemental oxygen safely in accordance with current standards of practice and licensed practitioner orders. If oxygen therapy was discontinued, discard all disposable components, replace filters as specified by the manufacturer, and disinfect the exterior surfaces of the oxygen equipment in accordance with the Instructions for Use.Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with an appropriate clinical indication. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The lack of an appropriate indication created the potential for improper medication administration and use of medication without a clearly defined clinical need. Findings include:Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including COPD, anxiety, and PTSD.Resident #23's care plan, revised 3/2/26, documented: give medications as ordered by physician.A review of Resident #23's physician orders documented the following order:- Morphine Sulfate 20 mg/mL, give 0.25 mL by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe pain related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, initiated on 7/7/26.On 7/9/26 at 2:45 PM, the CNO stated she did not know what the appropriate indication for the morphine order should be.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures as required. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #31) reviewed for food quality. This failure created the potential for reduced enjoyment of meals and decreased dietary intake when food was not served at acceptable temperatures. Findings include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, gastro esophageal reflux, and chronic kidney disease.On 7/7/26 at 3:16 PM, Resident #31 stated the hot food is always cold. She stated she generally eats in the dining room and that most of the time it is a problem. Resident #31 stated she normally does not ask for her food to be reheated because cold food is normal in the facility.On 7/9/26 at 7:46 AM, a request for a breakfast tray was made to the kitchen.On 7/9/26 at 8:12 AM, the tray was delivered by the CM. Food temperatures were taken and documented as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a physician order was clarified regarding its clinical indication and medication dosage. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#1 and #12) whose records were reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate documentation within the resident's medical record. Findings include: The facility's Documentation of Resident Health Status Needs & Services, revised 9/1/25, documented that the resident's medical record should be accurate, objective and clinically relevant. 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including morbid (severe) obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, and diabetes. A physician order dated 6/4/26 documented Resident #12 was to receive the following medications: -Toujeo SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 300 units/ml (insulin glargine), inject 120 units subcutaneously one time a day related to morbid obesity with alveolar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interviews it was determined the facility failed to consider caregiver/support person availability, capacity, and capability to perform required care as part of the identification of discharge needs. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for the facility's transfer and discharge process. This deficient practice created the potential for harm when Resident #1 was transported to a homeless shelter that was unable to provide the required level of care. Findings include: The facility's Discharge or Transfer policy revised 8/30/25, documented upon transfer of a resident, information necessary to meet the resident's needs should be provided.Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity (BMI 70), muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and anxiety/adjustment disorders.A Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required supervision/touching assistance for eating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, CMS SOM Appendix PP, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident centered care plans were comprehensively written. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) whose care plans were reviewed in the sample. This deficient practice created the risk of adverse outcomes if residents comprehensive care plans did not reflect the care necessary for each resident. Findings include:The CMS SOM, Appendix PP dated 7/23/25, documented each resident will have a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his or her preferences, goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs.A Resident Assessment (RAI) & Comprehensive Care Plans Policy and Procedure, revised 9/3/25, documented under section 4a: The Interdisciplinary team (IDT) will develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan within 7 days of the completion of the comprehensive assessment.Resident #1 was initially admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, CMS SOM Appendix PP, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) whose care plans were reviewed in the sample. This deficient practice created the risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include:The CMS SOM, Appendix PP, dated 7/23/25, documented a resident's care plan must be reviewed after each assessment and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions.A Resident Assessment (RAI) & Comprehensive Care Plans Policy and Procedure, revised on 9/3/25, documented under section 4b: The Care Plan will reflect: Discharge Planning Goals. Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled and dated. This was true for 1 of 2 medication carts inspected. This failure created the potential to receive expired medication with decreased efficacy. Findings include:On [DATE] at 9:03 AM, during a medication cart inspection the following medication was located with no open date or date of discard: Erythromycin ophthalmic ointment 5 milligram Trelegy Ellipta inhaler 62.5 microgramOn [DATE] at 09:06 AM, LPN #1 stated she was not sure how long the ophthalmic ointment was good for. She also stated both medications should have been labeled with the open date.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a pest-free environment and an effective pest control program. This deficient practice created the potential for facility residents (#3, #4, #6, #7, #12, #13, #16, #19, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, and #39) to experience pest infestation if measures were not taken to eradicate and contain common household pests like flies. Findings include:The facility's Resident Environment policy, revised 11/28/19, documented the facility will provide a homelike environment that is similar to that of a private home/ The facility's Pest Control policy, revised 10/18/23, documented routine inspections are conducted periodically at the facility for evidence of pests. Insect or pest sightings are reported to the housekeeping/maintenance supervisor. From 8/4/25 through 8/7/25, the following was observed:On 8/4/25 at 8:05 AM, a full fly trap was found hanging outside the facility on a nearby fence, two additional full fly traps were observed around the exterior fence of the facility.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored appropriately, dated, and not contaminated by ice, and the kitchen was clean and free of pests. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 31 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. The FDA Food Code Section 3-303.12 documented packaged food may not be stored in direct contact with ice or water if the food is subject to the entry of water because of the nature of its packaging, wrapping, or container or its positioning in the ice or water. On 8/4/25 at 8:20 AM, and on 8/7/25 at 11:15 AM, freezer icicles were observed in the vegetable and dough freezer stuck to the back of the fridge. Ice was stuck to the shelves containing boxes of food, opened and unopened, with ice dripping down through the shelves onto additional boxes of opened and unopened food. On 8/7/25 at 11:17 AM, the Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement effective infection control practices during medication administration and shower room sanitation. This failure created the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility due to risk for cross-contamination and adverse outcomes. Findings include:1. On 8/6/25 at 9:57 AM, during an inspection of Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] with the Director of Maintenance, the following environmental concerns were observed:The shower floor, specifically the area where residents stand during bathing, lacked grout between the tiles. Black mold-like substances were visible along the bottom edges of the shower walls.An adhesive trim affixed to the lower portion of the shower walls was peeling away. Upon closer inspection, the underside of the peeling adhesive trim also showed the presence of black mold-like material extending along the edge of the wall.On 8/6/25 at 9:57 AM, the Director of Maintenance stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of The Long-Term Care Agency reporting portal, facility's incident report, record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of abuse. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) whose record was reviewed for Abuse and Neglect. This failure created the potential for undetected harm due to incomplete investigative procedures. Findings include:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia, auditory hallucinations, and chronic pain syndrome.On review of The Long-Term Care Agency reporting portal an incident dated 1/3/25 was reported. The incident documented Dietary Aide #1 and Dietary Aide #2 provided Resident #7 with THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) gummies; a psychoactive substance derived from cannabis. On review of the facility's incidents and accidents, a report initiated on 1/3/25 was located documenting the following investigation:On 1/3/25, the previous CEO was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a residents Minimum Data Set assessment included correct information. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) whose records were reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This deficient practice had the potential for negative consequences if residents were not monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: The RAI Manual, revised 10/1/24, documented section A1500, PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), was to be coded yes when a PASRR level II screening determined a resident had a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability, or related condition.Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and alcohol dependance. Resident #6's admission MDS Assessment, dated 10/21/24, documented under A1500 in Section A, no for the question, Is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for an evaluation and determination. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#5, #6, and #8), reviewed for PASRR level I evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if resident's specialized services for mental health needs were not evaluated by an appropriate state-designated authority. Findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and depression. The Change in Status MDS Assessment, dated 6/30/25, did not document Resident #5 had a PASRR level II. Resident #5’s PASRR level 1, dated 1/15/24, did not include documentation of Resident #5's depressive disorder, although it did document Resident #5 was taking Trazadone (an antidepressant) 50 milligrams at bedtime. On 8/6/25 at 5:15 PM, the Social Services Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate with hours posted daily for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels. Findings include:From 8/4/25 through 8/6/25 it was observed the nurse staffing information did not include the number of hours worked per shift for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants.On 8/6/25 at 10:30 AM, the Staffing Coordinator stated the hours worked for nursing staff were not posted for the number of covered positions on the daily staff postings. The hours should have been posted.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors were prevented. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#2, #3, and #17) whose records were reviewed for significant medication errors. These findings created the potential for increased pain and adverse outcomes when medication was not administered according to the resident's physician order. Findings include:The facility’s Medication Errors policy, revised on 8/1/23, documented the following: A medication error is observed or identified when the observation or administration of drugs are not in accordance with: Prescriber’s Orders Manufacture’s specification regarding the preparation and administration of the drug or biological. Accepted professional standards and principles that apply to the professional providing services. 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic pain, absence of left hip joint, and flexion deformity of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education per year for 2 of 3 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants; #1 and #2) reviewed for sufficient and competent CNA staffing. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving care from staff who were not adequately trained to meet residents' needs. Findings include:A review of CNA staff records documented CNA #1 and CNA #2 had been employed at the facility for over 12-months. On 8/6/25 at 4:15 PM, a review of CNA #1's training records did not document completed hours for the previous 12-month annual evaluation period for 2024/2025.On 8/6/25 at 4:25 PM, a review of CNA #2's training records did not document completed hours for the previous 12-month annual evaluation period for 2024/2025.On 8/7/25 at 8:35 AM, the CEO stated the facility was unable to produce any records that CNA #1 and CNA #2 had the required annual 12-hours of training for the evaluation period of 2024/2025.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a RN was on-site 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week to provide care and treatment to the residents. This is true for 5 of 21 days reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure created the potential for harm if routine and /or emergency nursing needs were unmet and had the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Sufficient Qualified Nurse Staffing policy and procedure, released 11/28/17, documented the facility use the service of an RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. A Three-Week Nursing Schedule dated 7/28/24 - 8/17/24 documented there was no RN on-site for 8 consecutive hours on the following dates: 7/28/24, 8/2/24, 8/4/24, 8/9/24, and 8/11/24. On 8/22/24 at 3:00 PM, the DON stated she and another RN take turns being on-call and come in as needed when an RN is not available for a shift in a 24-hour day. The DON stated she was not aware a RN was required to be on-site 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with clean equipment to obtain vital signs and perform transfers. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to experience psychosocial harm if unclean equipment was used for their care. Findings include: The facility's Resident's Environment policy and procedure, revised 11/28/19, documented the residents are to have a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environments provided that allows the resident to receive treatment and supports daily living safely. 1. On 8/19/24 at 12:40 PM and on 08/20/24 at 10:24 AM the following equipment was observed: - Two Hoyer lifts were visibly dusty. Their bases were observed to have clear dried brown substance on them. Thick white or gray type of material was observed wrapped around the wheels. One of the Hoyer lift control wands for electric lifting was smeared with a light brown substance. - Three mobile blood pressure machines were noticeably dusty on reading screen, top, legs, and bases. One of the BP cuff was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity. This was true for 3 of 7 residents (Resident's #24, #26, and #29) observed during dining in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience embarrassment, and low feelings of self-worth. Findings include: The facility's Dining Policy, revised 9/10/20, states the dining environment should enhance the quality of life of their residents by providing a pleasant atmosphere, including when the resident would like to eat, and having enough staff to serve the residents during mealtime. On 8/19/24 the following was observed: - At 12:10 PM, Resident #24 was sitting at a table by himself in the back corner. Resident #26 and Resident #29 were sitting at the end of the main table with two additional residents seated at the table with them. - At 12:25 PM, the facility staff began serving residents their meals. - At 12:31 PM, the tray cart was removed from the dining room. Resident #24, #26, and #29 had not been served their meal or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were provided to the hospital upon transfer. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for hospital transfers. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if Resident #16 was not treated in a timely manner due to lack of information provided upon transfer. Findings include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge policy and procedure, revised 10/15/22, documented upon transfer of a resident the following information should be provided to the receiving provider: a. Contact information of the practitioner who was responsible for the care of the resident; b. Resident representative information, including contact information; c. Advanced directive information; d. Special instructions and /or precautions for ongoing care, as appropriate; e. The resident's comprehensive care plan goals; and f. All information necessary to meet the resident's needs. Resident #16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) observed during medication administration. This created the potential for Resident #31 to develop a yeast infection when she did not rinse her mouth with water after taking her medication. Findings include: The Drugs website accessed on 8/27/24 stated to rinse your mouth well with water after taking fluticasone propionate (corticosteroid) to decrease the risk of a mouth infection. Spit out the water you rinsed with (do not swallow). Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissue). Resident #31 physician's order included fluticasone propionate inhalation 2 puffs inhale orally two times a day related to moderate persistent asthma. On 8/21/24 at 8:09 AM LPN #1 handed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice was followed for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for standards of practice. Resident #32's care plan was not followed as directed. This deficient practice created a potential for harm to Resident #32 if care and services were not delivered according to her care plan. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan policy, revised 10/15/22, states that care plans are developed for a resident's specific condition, to include specific, measureable objectives, to meet the resident's needs as identified by their assessment, and response to the interventions or change in the resident's condition. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and morbid obesity. Resident #32's care plan, dated 3/11/24, directed staff to monitor/document/report to the physician as needed the following signs/symptoms: Edema, weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents taking antipsychotic medications received an abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) evaluation. This is true for 2 of 5 residents (Resident's #5 and #16) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents receiving antipsychotic medications were not monitored for adverse side effects. Findings include: The American Psychiatric Association (APA) website, accessed on 8/28/24, recommended that all patients taking an antipsychotic medication should be screened for tardive dyskinesia (a movement disorder that causes sudden, uncontrollable movements in the face and body) every six months. 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a serious medical condition that occurs when blood collects between the skull and the surface of the brain), diabetes, and schizoaffective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 45 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Caldwell Care of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 1 of 5Cascadia of BoiseBoise, ID 1 of 5Coeur d Alene Health of CascadiaCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Colfax Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColfax, WA 1 of 5Colville Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaColville, WA 1 of 5Curry Village Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBrookings, OR 1 of 5Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 1 of 5Mount Ascension Transitional Care Of CascadiaHelena, MT 1 of 5Orchards of Cascadia, TheNampa, ID 1 of 5Spokane Valley Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadSpokane Valley, WA 1 of 5Teton Healthcare of CascadiaIdaho Falls, ID 2 of 5Cascadia of NampaNampa, ID 2 of 5Royal Plaza Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaLewiston, ID 2 of 5Salem Transitional CareSalem, OR 2 of 5Secora Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPortland, OR 2 of 5Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaSnohomish, WA 3 of 5Arbor Valley of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Brookfield Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBattle Ground, WA 3 of 5Clarkston Health And Rehab Of CascadiaClarkston, WA 3 of 5Clearwater Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaOrofino, ID 3 of 5Highland Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 3 of 5Northpark Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaPhoenix, AZ 3 of 5Shaw Mountain of CascadiaBoise, ID 3 of 5Weiser Care of CascadiaWeiser, ID 4 of 5Canyon West of CascadiaCaldwell, ID 4 of 5Cascadia of LewistonLewiston, ID 4 of 5Cove of Cascadia, TheBellevue, ID 4 of 5Grangeville Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaGrangeville, ID 4 of 5Lewiston Transitional Care of CascadiaLewiston, ID 4 of 5Mountain Valley of CascadiaKellogg, ID 4 of 5Paradise Creek Health and Rehab of CascadiaMoscow, ID 4 of 5Stafholt Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaBlaine, WA 4 of 5Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of CascadiaNampa, ID 5 of 5Alderwood Park Health And Rehab Of CascadiaBellingham, WA 5 of 5Aspen Park of CascadiaMoscow, ID 5 of 5Bend Transitional CareBend, OR 5 of 5Boswell Transitional Care Of CascadiaSun City, AZ 5 of 5Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of CascadiaEugene, OR 5 of 5Fairlawn Health And Rehabilitation Of CascadiaGresham, OR 5 of 5Hudson Bay Health And RehabilitationVancouver, WA

Showing 40 of 45; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TIMBERLINE OHI TENANT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/11/2022
CASCADIA HC GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2020
CASCADIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2025
HAMMOND, OWENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2020
LAFORTE, STEPHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
MOORHOUSE, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2025
NELSON, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
ROWE, PRESTONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$194K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 3%Other / private 9%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $194K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$307per resident / day
operating cost
$9,329per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Idaho
$10,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,175/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135095. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next