Marrero Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespread
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place to ensure the resident record accurately reflected the code status for residents, and that staff knew how to confirm a resident's code status if an emergency occurred for 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #9) of 25 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #9, Resident #15, Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #34, Resident #35, Resident #36, Resident #40, Resident #41, Resident #43, Resident #44, Resident #45, Resident #48, Resident #50, Resident #51, Resident #53, Resident #66, Resident #67, Resident #76, Resident #80, Resident #84, and Resident #237) sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on [DATE], when Resident #7 had a physician's order to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) in which no lifesaving measures were to be performed, and to allow natural death. Resident #7's advanced directive instructed that cardiopulmonary resuscitation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to meet the needs of the residents by failing to provide oversight to ensure an effective system was in place where the resident record accurately reflected the code status for advanced directives, and that staff knew how to confirm a resident's code status if an emergency occurred for 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #9) of 25 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #9, Resident #15, Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #34, Resident #35, Resident #36, Resident #40, Resident #41, Resident #43, Resident #44, Resident #45, Resident #48, Resident #50, Resident #51, Resident #53, Resident #66, Resident #67, Resident #76, Resident #80, Resident #84, and Resident #237) sampled residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. This lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on [DATE], when Resident #7 had a physician's order to Do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintained infection control practices while disturbing drinks in the dining room for 2 (S6Certified Nursing Assistant, S7Certified Nursing Assistant[CNA]) of 2 staff observed serving drinks in the dining room. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy revealed, in part, hand hygiene should be performed after touching residents' environment or belongings.Observation on 03/22/2026 at 12:15PM revealed S7CNA was refilling drinking cups from the hydration cart during lunch in the dining room. Further observation revealed the hydration cart contained 2 large carafes on the top shelf and a clear container with ice and an ice scooper on the second shelf. Further observation revealed S7CNA picked up Resident #8's personal drinking cup, opened the lid, picked up the ice scoop from the ice container, and refilled Resident #8's personal drinking cup with ice. Further observation revealed S7CNA placed the ice scoop into the ice container, with the handle of the ice scoop touching the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure provider ordered laboratory services were completed as ordered for 1 (Resident #84) of 2 resident records reviewed for wound care. Findings:Review of Resident #84's Wound Care provider's progress note dated 02/25/2026 revealed orders for the nursing home to obtain a Complete Blood Count (CBC) (a blood test that measures the amount of white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets), a Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP) (a blood test that measures several body functions and processes, such as kidney and liver functioning), an Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (a blood test that is used to determine inflammation in the body), a C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (measures a protein made by the liver that increases when there is inflammation), a Prealbumin level (a blood test that measures the amount of protein in the dietary intake), and a Hemoglobin A1c (a blood test that measures the percentage of hemoglobin in red blood cells that has glucose attached, reflects the average blood sugar levels over the past 2-3 months) first…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff donned necessary Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 (Resident #61) of 1 sampled resident observed for catheter care. Findings:Review of the facility's policy for Catheter Care, Urinary, reviewed 03/03/2026, revealed, in part, staff are to maintain infection control by the use of EBP when handling or manipulating a resident's catheter drainage system. Review of the facility's policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 04/01/2024 and reviewed 03/03/2026, revealed, in part, EBP were used in conjunction with standard precautions and expanded the use of PPE to donning of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provided opportunities for the transfer of Multi-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staff's hands and clothing. Further review revealed, EBP was indicated for indwelling medical devices even if the resident was not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. Further review revealed, an example…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure shower rooms were maintained in a safe and sanitary manner for 2 (shower room x, shower room y) of 2 (shower room y, shower room z) shower rooms observed for physical environment. Findings: Observation on 02/24/2025 at 11:07AM, revealed an unlabeled spray bottle located in the cabinet in shower room x that contained an unknown pink liquid. In an interview on 02/24/2025 at 11:08AM, S10Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated she showered multiple residents in shower room x the morning of 02/24/2025, and used the unknown pink liquid to clean the shower stall after each use. S10CNA further indicated she could not identify what type of pink liquid was in the spray bottle. In an interview on 02/24/2025 at 11:04AM, S6Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) indicated she was unaware of any pink liquids used to clean the shower stalls of the facility. S6HS further indicated S10CNA should not have used the unknown pink liquid to clean the shower stall in room x. In an interview on 02/25/2025 at 12:19PM, S1Administrator confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and or/ physician's orders were accurately documented on the medication administration record (MAR) for 2 (Resident#3, Resident#75) of 2 (Resident #3, Resident #75) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, reviewed on 07/08/2024, revealed, in part, medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Further review revealed, the individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses of, acute and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, insomnia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of Resident#3's MAR revealed, in part, the following medications were not documented by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when unattended for 1 (medication cart c) of 3 medication carts (medication cart a, medication cart b, medication cart c) reviewed for storage of medications. Findings: Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy dated July 2024 revealed, in part, medication carts containing drugs and biologicals should be locked when not in use and unlocked medication carts should not be left unattended. Observation on 02/25/2025 at 11:09AM, revealed medication cart c was left unlocked and unattended in the hallway from 11:09AM through 11:10AM. In an interview on 02/25/2025 at 11:10AM, S4LPN indicated she left medication cart c unlocked and unattended while she entered a resident's room to administer medications, and should not have.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. food items were labeled with an opened date and/or stored properly, and; 2. expired food was not available for resident consumption in the kitchen area. Findings: Review of the facility's Dry Food Storage Policy, dated 10/2022 and reviewed on 01/2023 revealed, in part, all items must be dated with the date that the food was delivered and if taken out of the original container, it must be labeled and dated. Further review of the policy revealed all expired foods must be removed from the dry food storage room. Observation of the facility's dry food storage room on 02/23/2025 at 8:30AM, revealed an opened bottle of red food coloring, without an opened date or an expiration date. Further observation revealed an opened bottle of soy sauce located in the kitchen on the bottom shelf of a stainless steel serving cart with an expiration date of 10/2023 and an opened date of 4/14/2024 and to refrigerate after opening. In an interview on 02/23/2025 at 8:40AM, S8Cook indicated the bottle of red food coloring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to: 1. Ensure residents who were identified as unsafe smokers, did not have access to smoking materials for 1 (Resident #15) out of 3 (Resident #5, Resident #15, and Resident #45) unsafe smokers reviewed for smoking; and 2. Ensure water accessible to residents did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit for 6 (Bathroom a, Bathroom b, Bathroom d, Bathroom e, Bathroom f, and Bathroom e) of 6 (Bathroom a, Bathroom b, Bathroom d, Bathroom e, Bathroom f, and Bathroom e) resident bathrooms investigated for hot water temperatures. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Smoking Policy - Supervised and Unsupervised dated October 2022 revealed, in part, it was the responsibility of the facility to provide a safe and hazard free environment. Review revealed, the facility was responsible for enforcement of Smoking Policies. Further review revealed, residents wishing to smoke while at the facility would have a Smoking Safety Evaluation completed to determine the resident's ability to follow smoking policies safely. Review further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food that was available for use was properly stored, dated, and labeled in the facility's kitchen refrigerator; and, 2. Ensure food that was available for use was not expired. Findings: Review of the facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy dated October 2022 revealed, in part, all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer would be covered, labeled, and dated. Observation on 02/18/2024 at 9:28 a.m. of the facility's kitchen refrigerator revealed: -an open black Styrofoam box of cooked spaghetti noodles; -a small plastic container of pureed meat not dated; -a bag of sliced yellow cheese not dated; -a half filled pitcher full of a light brown liquid not dated nor labeled; -a clear square container of yellow substance not dated nor labeled; -1 gallon of dill pickle relish with an expiration date of 11/04/2022; -a 138 ounce (oz) jug of mild picante sauce with an expiration date of 11/23/2022; -a large container of sliced strawberries in sugar with an expiration date of 05/07/2022; -12 -1 quart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administered medications were assessed prior to self-administering medications for 2 (Resident #30 and Resident #66) of 2 (Resident #30 and Resident #66) sampled residents reviewed for medication self-administration. Findings: Review of facility policy: Self-Administration of Medications revealed, in part, the following: As a part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications was safe and clinically appropriate for the resident; If it was deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this was documented in the medical record and the care plan; For self-administering residents, the nursing staff determines who was responsible for documenting medications were taken; Self-administered medications were to be stored in a safe and secure place, which was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$46,261 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $46,261 — penalty dated 2024-02-21
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-21 for 41 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $571K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA