Thibodaux Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure soiled laundry and biohazard waste in an isolation room was maintained in a sanitary manner for1 (Resident #65) of 1 sampled residents on transmission based precautions investigated for infection control practices. Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, dated 01/2020 and reviewed 03/03/2026, revealed an infection prevention and control program was established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Review of the facility's Medical Waste - Segregating and Separating policy, dated 05/2012, revealed everyone who generated or handled medical waste would be responsible for discarding it into appropriate receptacles, and medical waste would be discarded into designated containers. Review of the facility's Isolation Protocol In-Service Training Report dated 01/14/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medications was maintained in the original manufacturer's or pharmacy's label for 1 (Medication Cart e) of 3 (Medication Cart e, Medication Cart f, and Treatment Cart g) medication carts observed. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy and procedure, dated 04/01/2019 and last reviewed 07/08/2024, revealed, in part, the individual administering the medications should check the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before administering the medications. Observation on 03/24/2025 at 3:33PM revealed Medication Cart e contained a medication cup for Resident #1, Resident #17, Resident #28, Resident #32, Resident #30, Resident #45, Resident #55 and Resident #39 and two medication cups for Resident #14 and Resident #22. Further observation revealed the above mentioned medication cups contained each residents' medications, but were only labeled with the residents' names.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0836 — pattern
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record reviews, the facility's administration failed to ensure the facility provided 2.35 hours of direct nursing care per resident for 4 (09/15/2024, 10/27/2024, 11/10/2024, 12/08/2024) of 27 (09/15/2024, 10/05/2024, 10/06/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/13/2024, 10/19/2024, 10/20/2024, 10/26/2024, 10/27/2024, 11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/09/2024, 11/10/2024, 11/16/2024, 11/17/2024, 11/23/2024, 11/24/2024, 11/30/2024, 12/01/2024, 12/07/2024, 12/08/2024, 12/14/2024, 12/15/2024, 12/21/2024, 12/22/2024, 12/28/2024, and 12/29/2024) weekend days reviewed for required staffing hours. Findings: Review of the facility's Administrator job description, dated March 2017, revealed, in part, the Administrator's responsibilities were to maintain and guide the implementation of the facility's policies and procedures in compliance with corporate, state, federal and other regulatory guidelines. Review of the Louisiana Administrative Code Chapter 97-Nursing Facilities, last updated in 11/2023, revealed, in part, the nursing facility shall provide 2.35 hours of care per resident per day.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained while emptying a urinary catheter bag for 1 (Resident #54) of 1 (Resident #54) sampled residents investigated for urinary catheter care. Findings: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy and procedure, dated 04/01/2024 and revised on 03/19/2025, revealed EBP referred to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Further review revealed EBP was used in conjunction with standard precautions and expanded the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to don (put on) a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities. Further review revealed, in part, EBP was indicated for residents with indwelling medical devices which included, in part, urinary catheters. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed ensure a resident's Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a soft, plastic feeding tube that goes into the stomach used to provide nutrition when oral intake is inadequate) feeding was not administered while a resident was in a flat position for 1 (Resident #37) of 1 (Resident #37) resident investigated for PEG tube feedings. Findings: Review of Resident #37's electronic medical record revealed, in part, Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident #37's March 2025 physician orders revealed, in part, an order to administer Resident #37's Glucerna 1.2 (a form of liquid nutrition) at 70 milliliters/hour (mls/hr) through Resident #37's PEG tube. Further review revealed an order for staff to keep the head of Resident #37's bed elevated during PEG tube feedings. Review of Resident #37's care plan revealed, in part, an intervention to keep the head of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store a resident's respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for 1 (Resident #54) of 3 (Resident #25, #35, #54) residents investigated for respiratory care. Findings: Review of Resident #54's electronic medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of Resident #54's March 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, the following orders: - continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) full mask with oxygen at 2 liters (L) per minute every night and as needed; - ipratropium-albuterol solution (a breathing treatment) 0.5-2.5 (3) milligrams (mg)/3 milliliters (mls), inhale 3 mls orally every 4 hours, as needed, for shortness of breath or wheezing via nebulizer; and, - oxygen at 2L per minute via nasal cannula continuously every shift related to chronic respiratory failure. Observation on 03/24/2025 at 7:55AM revealed Resident #54's CPAP mask and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Food was stored in a sanitary manner for 2 (Refrigerator a and Refrigerator c) of 3 (Refrigerator a, Refrigerator b, Refrigerator c) refrigerators and 1 (Freezer d) of 1 (Freezer d) freezers observed for food storage; and, 2. Ensure the facility's kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner. Findings: 1. Observation of Refrigerator a on 03/23/2025 at 8:40AM revealed an opened and undated bag of browned lettuce, an opened and undated container or parmesan cheese, an onion with a black spot that was approximately ¼ of the size of the onion inside of a clear plastic tub with other onions. Observation of Freezer d on 03/23/2025 at 8:40AM revealed a bag of white beans which was unlabeled with the contents of the bag. Observation of Refrigerator c on 03/23/2025 at 8:45AM revealed shredded cheese was scattered across the bottom of Refrigerator c. Observation of the kitchen with S3Dietary Manager on 03/24/2025 at 11:07AM revealed an opened and undated container of parmesan cheese and an onion with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement physician ordered interventions to prevent future falls for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Resident Incident and Visitor Accident Report revised on 07/23/2018 revealed, in part, the Director Of Nursing (DON) or designee completes the investigation and comes to a reasonable conclusion regarding causative factors surrounding the incident and the actions necessary to prevent further incidents/accidents. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's fall scale evaluation dated 12/03/2024 revealed, in part, a score of 55. A score of 55 indicated Resident #2 was at a high risk for falls. Review of Resident #2's January 2025 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, on 09/13/2023 an order was received for a pommel cushion (A pommel cushion is a wheelchair cushion with a raised center section, or pommel, that helps keep the user's legs apart and supported) placed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure to ensure staff maintained fluids within a resident's reach for a resident identified as being at risk for dehydration. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for hydration. Findings: Review of the facility's Hydration Management policy and procedure dated January 2023 revealed, in part, residents identified with potential/actual dehydration would be evaluated for contributing risk factors/conditions. Further review revealed risk factors for dehydration may include diarrhea/vomiting and a plan of care for the resident would be developed to ensure provisions of adequate fluid intake. Further review revealed water pitchers would be placed at a resident's bedside unless otherwise indicated. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/06/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained during showers for 4 (Resident #8, Resident #28, Resident #30, and Resident #215) of 4 sampled residents investigated for privacy. Findings: Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/01/2024 revealed, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. A score of 15 indicated Resident #8 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 03/18/2024 at 11:22 a.m., Resident #8 indicated she did not have privacy during showers and she was embarrassed when other people saw her naked. In an interview on 03/19/2024 at 10:18 a.m., S11Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated 2 residents use shower room A at the same time. S11CNA indicated when there were 2 residents in the shower room it was very likely they would see each other naked. Observation of shower room A on 03/19/2024 at 3:41 p.m. revealed the ceiling between the shower and the open area of the shower room had tracks for a privacy curtain, and there was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $557K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA