Manahawkin Health And Rehabilitation Center
1211 Rt 72 West, Manahawkin, NJ 08050 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (609) 597-8500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $208,234 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.7% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.4% | 18.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.0% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.8% | 12.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.69 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.12 | 1.11 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.7%CMS range 24.4–56.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 8.1–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 25.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 20.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.1–15.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 104.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.81 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.95 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 03/05/2026, 03/09/2026, and 03/10/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for its residents. The facility failed to ensure that a resident (Resident #9) who had smoked inside the facility against facility policy on four previous occasions since 08/02/2025 did not have smoking materials in their possession or smoke in the facility and in the presence of a resident (Resident #16) who was receiving oxygen therapy on 01/28/2026. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent smoking in the resident's room on 12/18/2025 when the resident refused to surrender their smoking materials; and on 01/28/2026, when Resident #9 was discovered smoking indoors, in the presence of a roommate who was receiving oxygen therapy and refused to surrender their smoking materials. The facility also failed to investigate and implement interventions to prevent smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-25 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for a resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #18).Resident #18, who had a history of intravenous (IV) drug use and was admitted to the facility with endocarditis to receive IV antibiotics, was discharged from the facility with their Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) in place. The PICC is thin, flexible tube inserted into a large upper arm [NAME] and guided to the large [NAME] near the heart. Resident #18 had documented complications of up to 9 dislodgements of their PICC line. During an interview on 3/10/26, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed that a resident with a history of IV drug use discharged with a PICC line in place had the potential for harm or death. During an interview on 3/10/26 with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the LNHA confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: 2701205 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 12/29/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to create a safe environment and provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of a resident (Resident #2) with poor decision-making abilities. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #2). During the survey a finding that constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified under CFR 483.12(a)(1) F689. The facility failed to: a) provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of a resident with poor decision-making abilities (Resident #2), b) develop appropriate interventions to prevent elopement, and c) follow their elopement and wandering policy. On 12/24/2025 at approximately 1:40 AM, Resident #2 was seen by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 walking in the hallway. Resident #2 eloped from the facility by watching staff type a code into a pin-pad near the exit door and waiting for a light on the door's locking mechanism to turn green to exit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints:2794269, 2679147, 2588899, 2639889, 2789654, 2789700 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of pertinent facility documents on 03/05/2026, 03/09/2026 and 03/10/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that physician ordered medication was obtained and available to be administered and b.) maintain records of, receipt, accountability, and removal from inventory of controlled drugs, for 4 out of 5 residents (Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #15, and Resident #18) reviewed for methadone (opioid medication that treats severe, chronic pain and substance use disorder). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes persistent sadness and loss of interest), recurrent, unspecified; anxiety disorder (condition that causes excessive, uncontrollable worry); and opioid abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespreadDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint: 2639889Based on interviews, medical record reviews and reviews of other pertinent facility documentation on 3/5/26, 3/9/26, 3/10/26, and 3/18/26, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered Care Plan (CP) for residents: with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line, methadone use, oxygen use, smoking and a history of substance abuse. The CPs lacked foci, goals and interventions addressing proper line integrity, monitoring dislodgement, safe administration of methadone, safe utilization of oxygen, addressing residents who were found smoking in their rooms, and for residents with history of substance abuse. This failure resulted in the residents experiencing multiple PICC dislodgements without clear staff directions for response, placing the residents at risk for improper handling and monitoring which could have led to potential harm. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 20 residents reviewed for resident records (Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record reviews and reviews of other pertinent facility documentation on 3/5/26, 3/9/26, 3/10/26, and 3/18/26, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents medical records were complete, accurate and readily accessible as evidenced by: a.) the facility not being able to provide surveyors with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) logs, b.) the facility not being able to provide surveyors with declining sheets for residents on methadone, c.) the facility not being able to provide surveyors with complete and correctly documented 1:1 logs, and d.) the facility not being able to provide surveyors with a personal belongings log for a resident that was being admitted to the facility. This deficient practice resulted in incomplete and unavailable clinical records, which had the potential to impact the facility's ability to ensure appropriate care, monitor resident conditions, ensure accountability of services provided, and protect residents. This deficient practice was identified for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and maintain a comprehensive facility assessment that accurately identified the mental and behavioral health needs of its resident population and the resources necessary to provide appropriate care.On 2/11/26 at 11:54 AM, the surveyor requested a copy of the Facility Assessment (FA).On 2/11/26 at 1:25 PM, the surveyor reviewed the FA dated 7/22/25.The FA under Purpose Statement: The purpose of this assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for our residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.The FA under, Scope identified: The facility's resident population, including but not limited to: the number of residents and the facility's resident capacity. The care required by the resident population using evidence-based, data-driven methods that consider the types of diseases, conditions, physical and behavioral health needs, cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of Nurse Staffing Report (NSR) it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked seven days a week for at least eight consecutive hours a day for 4 of 14 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 0n 2/3/26, the surveyor requested the NSR to be completed for the 2 weeks of staffing prior to survey from 01/18/2026 to 01/31/2026.A review of the NSRs completed by the facility for the above requested weeks revealed the facility had no RN coverage for all shifts on 1/18/26, 1/21/26, 1/28/26 and 1/31/26. On 2/11/26 at 8:06 AM, during a telephone conversation, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator confirmed she was aware there was no RN coverage for the above mentioned dates. She stated, It was due to call outs. NJAC 8:39-25.2(h)
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-03 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #2731638 Based on interviews and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with their breakfast meal at a regular time comparable to normal mealtimes, with no more than 16 hours elapsing between the evening meal and the breakfast meal the following day. This deficient practice was identified for one of one breakfast meal (1/31/26) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: On 2/3/26 at 11:48 AM, the surveyor interviewed the second floor Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who stated breakfast usually was delivered to her residents between 7:45 AM and 8:15 AM. She further stated that on Saturday (1/31/26) breakfast was not delivered until approximately 11 AM. The LPN stated she provided some of her residents with snacks from the pantry while they were waiting for breakfast that morning. She stated she did not know the reason for the delay in breakfast being served but continued to provide her morning care as usual until breakfast arrived. She further stated the nursing staff did not have a key to the kitchen. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2701205Based on observations, interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on [DATE], it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain a physician order for a resident (Resident #4) to go out of the facility on pass (OOP) or take leave of absence (LOA) from the facility, and b) update care plans for two residents (Resident #4 and Resident #6) with focuses and interventions related to the residents going OOP or LOA from the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2701205 Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on [DATE] and [DATE], it was determined that facility staff failed to document interventions intended to prevent elopement that were provided to a resident with a history of elopement from the facility (Resident #2). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE], at 11:24 A.M., the Surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #2 and observed a wandeguard (system that uses wearable tags to limit access to areas of the facility) tag on the resident's ankle. Resident #2 explained that they wore the tag because they had escaped, from the facility 5 or 6 days prior. The Surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #2. According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: diabetes mellitus due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint: 2564823Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain refrigerated potentially hazardous foods at appropriate temperatures to prevent potential microbial growth, b.) discard foods that were past their date of expiration and showed signs of spoilage, c.) maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner, e.) accurately record appropriate cooking and holding temperatures, and f.) accurately record refrigeration temperatures. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 07/18/2025 at 9:30 A.M., the surveyor and the [NAME] toured the kitchen and observed the needle of the dial type external thermometer on the chest refrigerator was resting in the lowest possible position (below -40 degrees Fahrenheit (F)). The thermometer did not appear to be functioning. The internal thermometer read 50 degrees F. There was cloudy liquid pooled at the bottom of the chest refrigerator. During a follow up tour and interview on 07/18/2025 at 12:00 P.M., the Food Service Director (FSD) confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 2564823 Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable room temperature levels in residents' shower rooms and in the facility elevator. This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 4 resident shower rooms and in 1 of 1 facility elevator (elevator car 1). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 07/18/2025 at 10:23 A.M., the surveyor checked temperatures in different locations throughout the facility in the presence of the Maintenance Person (MP) and the following were obtained: The second-floor East shower room has room temperature of 84.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). which is above the required temperature range of 71 to 81 F. There were no residents present at this time.The second-floor [NAME] shower room had room temperature of 84.4 degrees F in the shower stall and 84.2 degrees F outside of the stall. No residents were present in the shower room.In the Elevator car 1, the air temperature was 84.6 degrees F. No residents present in the elevator.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a family member's concern regarding missing clothing and personal items were filed as a grievance and investigated for one of nine sample residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for grievances. This had the potential for residents' rights not being supported, to have their lost belongings searched for, and/or reimbursed.Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance Guideline, revised on 05/31/23, revealed Purpose: To provide a process to voice grievances (such as those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) and respond with prompt efforts to resolve while keeping the resident and/or resident representative appropriately apprised of progress toward resolution.Grievance Official: Our facility Grievance Official is the Administrator and/or Designee appointed by the Administrator.A grievance or concern may be expressed orally or in writing to the Grievance Official or facility staff. RESOLUTION: The Grievance Official and/or designee will complete a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 2564823 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 07/18/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications according to the acceptable standards of nursing practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated Title 45. Chapter 11. New Jersey Board of Nursing Statutes 45:11-23. Definitions b. The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribe by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Diagnosing in the context of nursing practice means that identification of and discrimination between physical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of hospital records, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ordered treatments were completed for fungal dermatitis (skin infection) and arterial ulcers for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for skin integrity out of a total sample of nine residents. This had the potential for fungal dermatitis and arterial ulcers to worsen and a potential for infection.Review of the facility's policy titled, Skin Integrity-Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD) with a date implemented 02/14/23, revealed Residents who are incontinent will receive appropriate treatment and services for the prevention and management of IAD.e. For residents with fungal skin infection, apply antifungal products as ordered by the physician.Review of R2's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the admission Record tab revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on 05/25 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and gangrene. The resident was discharged from the facility in 07/25.Review of R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of hospital records, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ordered treatments were completed for pressure ulcers for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of nine residents. This had the potential for the pressure ulcers to worsen and a potential for infection. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management with a date implemented 02/14/23, revealed This facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries, unless clinically unavoidable, and to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection, and the development of additional pressure ulcers/ injuries.2. The facility shall establish and utilize a systematic approach for pressure injury prevention and management, including prompt assessment and treatment.Review of R2's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the admission Record tab revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on 05/25 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of Nursing Staffing Report sheets and facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 2 of 14 days reviewed 11/17/2024 through 11/30/2024. Based on interview and review of Nurse Staffing Report sheets, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 2 of 14 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for the week of 11/17/2024 through11/23/2024, revealed the facility had no RN coverage for all shifts on 11/18/2024 and 11/23/2024. During an interview with the surveyor on 12/06/2024 at 2:06 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) expressed that staffing needs are met to some extent but not fully. When an RN is unavailable to work the required 8 consecutive hours, the DON steps in as a supervisor, rather than fulfilling the DON role. At that time, the Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/23/2023 Based on observations, interviews, and review review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the planned, written menu and ensure residents were notified in advance of menu changes for 3 of 3 meals observed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/03/2024 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal on the 2nd floor dining/activity room. The surveyor observed Resident #48 and seven (7) additional residents at the lunch meal. All eight (8) residents were observed to have received diced peaches in a clear plastic portion control cup for dessert at the lunch meal. According to the 12/3/2024 Week 4 cycle menu provided to the surveyor on entry to the facility, residents were to receive yellow cake for the dessert at the lunch meal on 12/03/2024. There was no yellow cake observed. When interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD) told the surveyor that they (kitchen staff) didn't make any. In addition, the lunch menu also included that a dinner roll was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of there facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/02/2024 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. On the top shelf of a multi-tiered rack in the dry storage area, a previously opened pack of coffee filters were removed from their original packaging and left uncovered. The usable surface was exposed to contamination. 2. On a middle shelf of the walk-in freezer contained frozen pizza box previously opened. The lids to the box were open and the plastic bag inside that contained the pizza was opened and the pizza was exposed to the air and contamination. 3. The surveyor observed the kitchen staff operating the high temperature dish machine after the breakfast meal. The staff were actively washing dishes during this observation. The surveyor asked the FSD what the facility process was for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units (1st floor and 2nd floor) and was evidenced by the following: On 12/03/2024 at 11:22 AM, Surveyor #1 observed the wheels on 2 East and 2 [NAME] medication carts. There was hair and strings wrapped around the wheels. On 12/03/2024 at 11:26 AM, Surveyor #1 observed hair and debris wrapped around the wheels of the Hoyer lift on 2nd floor. On 12/03/2024 at 11:33 AM, Surveyor #1 observed 1/2 PB&J sandwich under the bed of room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 12/03/2024 at 11:42 AM, Surveyor #1 observed the 1 west treatment cart with hair wrapped around the wheels. On 12/03/2024 at12:16 PM, Surveyor #1 observed the wheels on 1 [NAME] with large amount dark hair wrapped around the wheels. On 12/06/24 at 11:18 AM Surveyor #2 observed the interior of Resident #260's room. Resident #260 had there bed against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, was completed. This deficient practice was identified for 6 of 28 residents reviewed (Residents #35, Resident #107, Resident #99, Resident #67. Resident #102, and Resident #1). and was evidenced by the following: 1.During the initial tour of the facility on Resident #35 was observed lying in bed using a cell phone with his/her left hand. Resident #35's right hand was observed to be contracted. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 12/02/2024 at 2:14 PM revealed the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Cerebral Infarction due to Thrombosis (stroke due to a blood clot). A review of the most recent comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #35 had impaired mobility on one side of both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address the use of A. an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication, B. oxygen therapy, C. a splint used to prevent further contracture, and D. a wander alarm used to prevent elopement. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 28 sampled residents, (Resident #8, Resident #18, Resident #35, and Resident #99) and was evidenced by the following: A.) On 12/2/2024 at 11:01 AM, during the initial tour, Resident #8 was identified as being on an anticoagulant. A review of Resident #8's EMR on 12/02/2024 at 02:11 PM, revealed the following: A review of Resident #8's admission Record revealed that he/she had diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Acute Embolism (a blockage of a pulmonary artery) and Thrombosis of Deep Veins of the Upper Extremity (a blood clot forms in a vein deep inside a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatment for range of motion limitations were provided for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #102, Resident #1, and Resident #35) reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/03/2024 at 10:21 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #102 lying in bed with a black splint on his/her left lower arm and wrist area. He/she stated that the orthopedic doctor provided the black arm splint and a black cam boot due to a broken left arm and ankle, but he/she no longer wears the cam boot. He/she puts the splint on his/her left lower arm and wrist at night and removes it when he/she chooses. On 12/03/2024 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor #1 reviewed the EMR for Resident #102 as follows: According to the admission Record Resident #102 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: fracture of shaft of left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for supplemental oxygen and not replacing and properly storing a nasal cannula (tube used to deliver oxygen to a person) in accordance with facility policy. This deficient practice occurred for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #54, Resident #261, and Resident #18) reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/3/2024 at 1:38 PM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #54 in their room sitting on their bed and was being administered oxygen via nasal cannula. The resident informed the surveyor they had COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and would use the oxygen concentrator when in their room but when they wanted to go outside their room, they used the portable canister. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #54 and the following was revealed: A review of the admission Record reflected the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was transported from one area of the unit to another in a dignified manner for 1 of 28 sampled residents, (Resident #84). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/04/2024 at 11:37 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM #1) to pull a resident (Resident #84) backward in his/her wheelchair (w/c) from the nurse's station to the dining/recreation room. Resident #84's feet on which he/she was wearing slippers, were dragging on floor. There were no foot rests observed on the w/c for the resident to put his/her feet on. The surveyor reviewed the EMR on 12/04/2024 11:54 AM, as follows: According to the admission Record Resident #84 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Alzheimer's disease. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate care dated 11/2/2024, revealed a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the required beneficiary notices for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification (SNF BPN), (Resident #9 and #22). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/04/2024 at 09:35 AM, the surveyor presented the facility certified social worker (CSW) with three (3) SNF BPN, one (1) resident discharged to home and two (2) residents that remained in the facility with Medicare A time remaining. The CSW explained to the surveyor that she just started issuing the SNF BPN forms in October after her predecessor left the facility. The CSW further told the surveyor on 12/04/2024 at 10:28 AM, I was unable to find the other form for the residents that went home (NOMNC CMS 10123). In my previous experience it just used to be a verbal conversation. The surveyor explained to the CSW that residents discharged to the facility with Medicare A time remaining required two (2) forms, Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage/NOMNC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (BCP) within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #102) and was evidenced by the following: On 12/03/2024 at 10:21 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #102 lying in bed with a black splint (medical device used to immobilize, support, or protect a body part) on his/her left lower arm and wrist area. He/she said that the orthopedic doctor (medical professional who specializes in the musculoskeletal system) provided the black arm splint and a black Controlled Ankle Motion boot (CAM) boot (medical boot used to immobilize and protect the foot, ankle, and lower leg following an injury or surgery) due to a broken left arm and ankle, but he/she no longer wears the CAM boot. He/she puts the splint on his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to document a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a final summary of the resident's status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization, (Resident #109). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/4/2024 at 1:49 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #109 which revealed the following: Resident #109's admission Record indicated the resident had been admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included myocardial infarction (heart attack), anxiety and adult failure to thrive (a syndrome in older adults characterized by a significant decline in physical and mental health). A review of the resident's Discharge assessment- return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (DRNAMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, reflected the resident had a planned discharge to short-term general hospital. A review of the resident's Progress Notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to address recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a consistent and timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #22 and Resident #90) and was evidenced by the following: The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/2/24 at 10:28 AM, during initial tour the Surveyor #1 observed Resident #22 in their room seated in a chair dressed and well-groomed. When asked if the staff took good care of them the resident responded by shaking their head yes then proceeded to get up from the chair and walk out of the room and down the hallway. Surveyor #1 reviewed Resident #22's medical record on 12/03/2024 at 09:51 AM as follows: A review of the admission Record reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, multiple fractures of the bones in the fingers, wrist and arms, and depression. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy reviews on 10/31/2024, the facility failed to notify the Physician of laboratory results for 1 of 3 Resident (Resident #3.) reviewed for laboratory services. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Physician of Resident#3 of the abnormal urinalysis results. The Surveyor reviewed the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was as follows: According to the admission Face Sheet Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to: Acute Kidney Failure and Acute Ethmoidal Sinusitis. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 08/23/2024 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15. This indicated that resident #3's cognition was intact. On 10/31/2024 at 10:20 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Unit Manager LPN (UM) who informed the Surveyor that urine specimen for Resident #3 was collected on 10/17/2024, The results were received by the facility on 10/18/2024. Resident #3 was started on antibiotic on 10/24/2024. UM stated the lab report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ173948 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 06/26/2024 and 06/27/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of clinical practice for documenting the administration of medications in the electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #3) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated Title 45. Chapter 11. New Jersey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/11/2023 from 9:15 to 9:58 AM, the surveyors, accompanied by the facility Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. Upon entry to the kitchen the surveyors observed a staff member at the ice machine inside of the kitchen door. The staff was actively filling a cooler on top of a wheeled cart with ice obtained from the ice machine. The staff member identified him/herself as a Recreation Assistant (RA). The female RA had lengthy hair and no hair net. The RA's hair was exposed while in the kitchen. The FSD agreed that all staff should don a hair net while in the kitchen. 2. On an upper shelf in the dry storage room a previously opened bag of uncooked pasta noodles had no dates. On interview the FSD stated that once…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program was being implemented, and failed to provide sources of qualitative data that showed the facility had analyzed or identified quality deficiencies and evaluated program effectiveness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/15/2023 at 10:17 AM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) advised the surveyor that they were unable to provide any sign-in sheets or documentation of a comprehensive QAPI program. During an interview with the surveyor on 09/15/2023, at 11:55 AM, the Administrator stated that the facility prior to his arrival in September 2023, was not conducting QAPI committee meetings. He added that the previous administration did not maintain any documentation that a QAPI program was implemented or maintained as required by the regulation. On 09/15/2023 at 01:13 PM during an interview with the DON, she stated that there has not been a QAPI program in place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) received 12 hours of mandatory in-service training and Dementia training as required. This was identified for 5 of 5 CNA files reviewed for in-service training under Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of five randomly selected CNA education files did not reveal the mandatory 12 hours in-service training and Dementia training. A review of Mandatory In-service sheets for year 2022 revealed that CNA #1 was hired on 11/11/2021 and completed 5.5 hours of the training. CNA #2 was hired on 06/16/2022 and completed 5.5 hours of the training. CNA #3 was hired on 07/26/2021 and completed 5.0 hours of the training. CNA #4 was hired on 05/18/2021 and completed 6.0 hours of the training. CNA #5 was hired on 08/12/2021 and completed 5.5 hours of the training. On 09/19/2023 at 12:10 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Staff Development…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a homelike atmosphere for 1 of 2 dining rooms, 2nd floor. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following.: On 9/11/2023 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal on the 2nd floor dining room. 14 total residents were in the dining room. 14 of 14 residents were served their meal on the tray and the food remained on the tray throughout the meal. On 9/13/2023 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal on the 2nd floor. 16 of 16 residents were served their meal on the tray and the food remained on the tray throughout the meal. On 9/15/2023 at 12:24 PM, the surveyor observed lunch meal on the 2nd floor dining room. All residents were served their meal on the tray and the food remained on the tray throughout the meal. During an interview with the surveyor on 9/18/2023 at 1:01 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 said everything should come off the tray in Dining Room. I don't think post covid people know to do that. During an interview with the surveyor on 09/18/2023 at 2:01 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to identify the use of a merry walker (a folding wheeled walker with a seat designed for use by individuals with balance or walking disabilities) as a physical restraint for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #77 and Resident #79) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/11/2023 at 10:23 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #77 in the 2nd floor dining room positioned in a merry walker. Resident #77 was non-interview able and pleasantly confused. Resident #77 was observed to be able to ambulate independently in the merry walker. The gate bar was observed to be in the closed position. The surveyor was unable to determine if Resident #77 was able to get out of the merry walker independently on this observation. On 09/13/2023 at 10:02 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #77 seated in the merry walker the 2nd…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) follow fall prevention interventions as written on the resident's plan of care and ordered by the physician and 2.) ensure a resident who sustained multiple falls and cause determined to be Seizure activity, was followed by a specialist. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #79, and Resident #167) reviewed for falls and accidents and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/11/2023 at 10:18 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #79 lying in bed. Resident #79 was unable to be interviewed at the time but was awake and alert. Resident #79 had a splint on their lower left arm and was wrapped with an ace bandage. Resident #79 was unable to tell the surveyors what happened to his/her left arm when asked. The bed was observed in a low position and the call bell was accessible. According to the admission Record Resident #79 was admitted to the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility 1.) failed to follow the planned, written menu and ensure residents were notified in advance of menu changes for 2 of 2 meals observed and 2.) failed to post the menu in area that was accessible to residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/13/2023 at 12:03 PM the surveyor observed the lunch meal in the 2nd floor dining/recreation room. The surveyor observed Resident #77. Resident #77 received an 8oz skim milk, coffee, lemonade 4oz, mechanical pork tenderloin with gravy, mashed potato with onions, wax beans, and applesauce. On 09/13/23 at 12:13 PM the surveyor reviewed the facility menu for the lunch meal on Wednesday 9/13/2023. The Food Service Director (FSD) stated to the surveyor on the initial tour of the kitchen that the facility was currently on week 2 of the cycle menu. The menu indicated that on week 2 on Wednesday 9/13/2023 the lunch meal was to consist of the following: Cheeseburger with bacon, macaroni & cheese, baby carrots, Bun, Brownie, beverage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' dining experience was provided in a manner to promote the dignity and respect of the residents, who were not served their meal at the same time while seated at the same table as well as serving all residents who are seated in the dining room at the same time. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 2 dining rooms, 2nd floor and was evidenced by the following: On 9/11/2023 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal in the 2nd floor dining room. On the 2nd floor a meal cart indicated was DR (dining room) cart. However, in the dining room was 14 total residents and 1 resident was actively eating and the other 13 were not yet served. On 9/11/2023 at 12:23 PM, a 2nd meal cart arrived in the DR and 5 residents received their lunch meal but 9 residents still with no tray and cart was removed to the unit to finish passing. On 9/11/2023 12:30 PM, a 3rd meal cart arrived to the DR. Prior to that, 2 residents had received their trays. The remaining 7 resident received their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the beneficiaries of potential financial liability and related standard claim appeal rights for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #368) reviewed for the Beneficiary Notification task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/15/2023 at 11:14 AM the surveyor randomly selected three residents that the facility identified on the Entrance Conference Worksheet, Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months for the Beneficiary Notification task. A review of the facility-completed, Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms revealed that Resident #368 did not have the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC). The Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form for Resident #368 revealed a hand-written note that read, Cannot be found [NOMNC]. On 09/15/2023 at 12:59 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing stated, We don't have it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete criminal background checks on employees prior to employment as well as to complete reference checks on employees before their start date. The deficient practice was identified for 6 of 10 employees reviewed for criminal background checks and 10 of 10 employees reference checks reviewed under Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of employee personnel files revealed that six of ten employees did not have a criminal background check completed prior to the start of the employment. A review of the same ten requested employee files revealed that all ten did not have reference checks done prior to start of the employment. On 09/18/2023 at 12:14 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Human Resources Director (HRD) replied, Every employee who wants to work here needs to have one done when the surveyor asked who was required to have a criminal background check completed. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a care plan for nail care as identified in the facility policy for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #101) investigated for Activities of Daily Living. On 09/11/2023 at 09:42 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #101 in a wheelchair in his/her room. At that time, the surveyor observed Resident #101's fingernails on his/her left hand. The fingernails were long and discolored. Resident #101 said to the surveyor that he/she needs them cut. On 09/12/2023 at 11:09 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, Resident #101 said that a doctor came to cut his/her toenails. Resident #101 told the surveyor again that he/she wants their fingernails cut. Resident #101's fingernails continued to appear long, discolored, and dirty. A review of Resident #101's Diagnoses located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of but not limited to, Type II Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for a resident specifically by not providing fingernail care. The deficient practice was observed for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #101) investigated for Activities of Daily Living and was evidenced by the following: On 09/11/2023 at 09:42 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #101 in a wheelchair in his/her room. At that time, the surveyor observed Resident #101's fingernails on his/her left hand. The fingernails were long and discolored. Resident #101 said to the surveyor that he/she needs them cut. On 09/12/2023 at 11:09 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, Resident #101 said that a doctor came to cut his/her toenails. Resident #101 told the surveyor again that he/she wants their fingernails cut. Resident #101's fingernails continued to appear long, discolored, and dirty. A review of Resident #101's Diagnoses located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide services to treat and prevent a decline in Range of Motion (ROM) for a resident with a contractures of the right hand. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for limited ROM (Resident #2) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/12/2023 at 08:54 AM, Resident #2 was observed in bed and being assisted with the breakfast meal by staff. Resident #2's hands were covered with bedding on this observation and the surveyor was unable to observed for right hand contracture. On 09/13/23 09:55 AM, Resident #2 was observed lying in bed and the soft comfy splint was observed to be on top of the bedside nightstand. On 09/13/20233 at 11:54 AM, the surveyors visited the room of Resident #2. Resident was not present on this observation, however, the surveyors did observe Resident #2's soft and comfy splint on the bedside nightstand. Resident #2 was then observed in the 2nd floor dining room at 11:59 AM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) at least every 12 months. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides reviewed under Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility-provided CNA annual performance evaluations revealed that 1 of the 5 CNAs did not have an annual performance evaluation. On 09/15/2023 at 12:01 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Human Resources Director confirmed one performance evaluation was not completed for one of the five CNAs. On 09/19/2023 at 01:08 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) replied, It should be done yearly when asked what the process for reviewing the performance evaluation for nurse aides was. The DON confirmed that the annual performance evaluation was not completed for one of the CNAs by replying, Yes when the surveyor stated that the CNA should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/19/2021 from 7:45 to 8:23 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the cook, observed the following in the kitchen: 1. A stand up fan at the entrance of the dry storage room and facing the food production area was in operation. The fan was observed to be covered with brown dust and debris on the fan guard. When interviewed the cook stated, We had it on every day because it's been so hot in here. [NAME] or the dishwasher could clean it. 2. On a lower shelf in the walk-in refrigerator a 1/6 pan was covered with plastic wrap and labeled sauce. The label was dated 7/13-7/16. On interview the cook stated, That's expired, I'm getting rid of it. The cook removed the 1/6 pan of sauce in the presence of the surveyor. 3. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation. it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call light within reach of the resident according to the facility policy. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 20 sampled residents, (Resident #56 and #69) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/19/2021 at 9:04 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #56 in their room. On interview Resident #56 was unable to show the surveyor where his/her call light was located. The surveyor observed Resident #56's call light on the floor in front of their roommates bedside table. The call light was not within reach of Resident #56. A review of the 5/27/2021, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, which revealed Resident #56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15, indicating resident # 56 had severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's dementia. On 7/20/2021 at 8:26 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment on 2 of 2 units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/19/21 at 7:53 AM, during the initial tour on the first floor of the facility, the surveyor observed cracked drywall and ripped wallpaper in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor also observed what appeared to be a broken door stop among crumbled drywall behind the room door. Resident #63 was present in the room during the observation. He/she stated, the room is filthy. On 7/20/21 at 8:46 AM, the surveyor entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #63 was present. The cracked drywall and ripped wallpaper from the previous day were observed again. The broken doorstop, and crumbled drywall from the previous day were also observed. During the visit, the surveyor observed the window screen which appeared to have buildup of dirt and dust. On the windowsill, behind the blinds were cobwebs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician ordered consult for Pain Management for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management, (Resident #87). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/20/21 at 12:15 PM, they surveyor observed resident #87 lying in bed watching television. The resident stated that he/she has suffered from chronic pain for 20 plus years. Resident #87 stated as long as he/she gets his/her pain medication on time, he/she can maintain a comfort level to function. Resident #87 added that he has not had a pain management consultation. A review of the medical record indicated that Resident #87 had a diagnosis of Multiple Trauma, Spinal Cord Injury, Neuropathy (nerve pain) and Chronic Pain Syndrome. A Quarterly Pain assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident reported pain level as 8/10 with frequent chronic pain in the arms and legs. A review of the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to detect and remove expired medication from 1 of 2 facility medication rooms reviewed during the Medication Storage task. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 10:49 AM, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), the surveyor observed 37 tablets of Oxycontin CR ( a controlled narcotic pain medication) 30 mg tablets in the first-floor medication room lockbox that had an expiration date of [DATE]. The LPN confirmed that the tablets were dated and expired on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:16 AM, the Registered Nurse (RN #1) stated that one tablet of the expired Oxycontin CR was given to Resident #16 on [DATE] at 9:00 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:57 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility received the expired Oxycontin from the pharmacy on [DATE]. She further stated, Don't get me wrong. We are wrong but I am going to call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$208,234 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $166,192 — penalty dated 2026-03-25
- $42,042 — penalty dated 2026-01-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANAHAWKIN OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/11/2022 |
| FARKOWITZ, ESTHER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 9% | since 03/11/2022 |
| BANK HAPOALIM B.M. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 03/11/2022 |
| CORLISS, BRIAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/11/2022 |
| RUVEL, MENACHEM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/11/2022 |
| CHAMPION CARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/11/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315206. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.