No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Madison Health and Rehabilitation Center

110 Belmont Rd., Madison, WI 53714 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 83 certified beds · (608) 249-7391 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 20244 immediate-jeopardy citations$289,198 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $289,198 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-25)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5600 Medical Circle · (608) 313-5632 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4518 Cottage Grove Rd · (608) 222-3648 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3817 Milwaukee St., Madison, WI, 53714
Park
4210 Portland Pkwy · (608) 266-4711 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
505 Dempsey Rd · (608) 246-5124

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.6%16.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened32.2%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.7%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.0%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%5.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.3%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.0%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.3%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.5%82.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.3%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.391.661.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.832.291.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.8%CMS range 30.3–53.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.3–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.8%CMS range 6.5–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 68.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-19)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-08-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-03-25 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 3 R65 was admitted to the facility 11/4/24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the following: cerebral infarction (stroke), contractures bilateral knees (when muscles, tendons, joints tighten or shorten causing a deformity), reduced mobility (inability to move freely), osteoarthritis (degenerative disease that worsens over time causing pain and stiffness) of knee. R65's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents, a score of 13 on his Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), which indicates R65 is cognitively intact. R65 is his own person. R65's comprehensive care plan states, in part, as follows: Focus area: (Date Initiated: 11/4/24; Date Revised: 3/9/25) The resident has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) CVA (cerebrovascular accident); Goal: The resident will improve current level of function in ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) through the review date. Interventions: The resident requires hoyer transfer by (2) staff with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 2 R65 was admitted to the facility 11/4/24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the following: cerebral infarction (stroke), contractures bilateral knees (when muscles, tendons, joints tighten or shorten causing a deformity), reduced mobility (inability to move freely), osteoarthritis (degenerative disease that worsens over time causing pain and stiffness) of knee. R65's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents, a score of 13 on his Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), which indicates R65 is cognitively intact. Section M indicates R62 does not have any pressure injuries (PIs) upon admission and is at risk of PI's. R65 is his own person. R65's care plan indicates the following Focus area: (Date Initiated: 11/4/24; Date Revised: 3/9/25) The resident has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) CVA (cerebrovascular accident); Goal: The resident will improve current level of function in ADL's through the review date. Interventions: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for wandering and elopement potential. R3 eloped from the facility on 7/6/24 and the facility did not know his whereabouts for approximately seven (7) hours. Facility staff let R3 out of the building but did not know who he was or ensure he was monitored for safety. Police contact was made and a community silver alert was issued due to R3's unknown whereabouts. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to R3 and ensure adequate supervision created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy that began on 7/6/24. NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 8/21/24 at 3:30 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 7/12/24; however, the deficient practice continues at a severeity/scope level of D (potential for harm/isolated) as the facility implements its removal plan. Findings include: The facility's Elopements and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure all residents who smoke did so safely for 4 of 4 (R4, R6, R7, and R8) residents reviewed. R4's Smoking Assessment and Care Plan indicated they required supervision while smoking and that all smoking material should be stored by the facility. R4 uses oxygen. On 12/8/23, R4 was allowed to keep their smoking materials in their possession. Staff observed R4 smoking in their room. Staff observed R4's oxygen running, with the nasal cannula sitting on the bedside table thereby enriching the room with oxygen. R4 admitted to Surveyor that she had smoking materials on her person prior to being deemed safe to smoke independently. This created an unsafe environment for R4 as well as other residents of the building as a fire could have started much easier with the oxygen enriched air in the room. The facility's failure to implement safety and accident prevention measures for residents that are assessed to be supervised smokers created a finding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 3 The facility's policy titled Wound Treatment Management dated 2/14/23 states in part . 2. In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify physician to obtain treatment orders. This may be the treatment nurse, or the assigned licensed nurse in the absence of the treatment nurse . R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic diastolic heart failure (a type of heart failure that occurs when the heart's left ventricle stiffens and cannot relax properly, preventing it from filling with enough blood), morbid obesity, depression, anxiety disorder, and history of stroke. R37's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R37 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15, indicating that R37 is cognitively intact. On 3/5/25 at 2:48 PM, Surveyor interviewed R37. R37 reported that she has open wounds under her breast and abdominal fold and that they have been bleeding for months. R37 reported that staff doesn't always change the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. R223 had a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) in her urine. R32, R44, and R47 later tested postived for the same MDRO. Hand hygiene was not performed per standards of practice for (R25 and R74). Residents (R223, R32, R44, & R47) are being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm), and (R25 and R74) are being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). R223 had extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) a MDRO, in R223's urine. ESBL is spread easily through hands and surfaces. The facility failed to ensure R223 was placed in proper transmission-based precautions. R32, R44, & R47 also tested positive after R223 was diagnosed with ESBL. Three of the residents resided on the same hall. Facility had no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-19 · tag F0564 — isolated
    Inform each resident of his or her visitation rights and ensure that all visitors enjoy equal visitation privileges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents had the right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of their choosing for 1 of 19 residents (R5) reviewed for visitation rights. This resulted in R5 experiencing depression, financial hardship, and disinterest in participating in activities of daily living (ADLs). R5's husband is limited by the facility to visiting between the hours of 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM, regardless of the resident's wishes. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Resident Right to Access and Visitation, undated, states: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate the resident's right to receive visitors of their choosing, at the time of their choosing, subject to the resident's right to deny visitation when applicable, and in a manner that does not impose on the rights of other residents . The policy also states, 1. The facility will provide immediate access to a resident by immediate family and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, facility staff did not ensure that each resident who required pain management received such services according to the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences for 2 of 19 residents (R6 and R5) reviewed for pain management. R6 asked for her as needed pain medication and did not receive it for almost 22 hours resulting in emotional distress, agitation, becoming physically hostile, and throwing objects. R5 was experiencing breakthrough pain at an 8 out of 10. R5 consistently takes her as needed (PRN) Hydromorphone every 4 hours for breakthrough pain. The facility ran out of R5's hydromorphone and R5 went several hours without her PRN medication which resulted in increased verbalizations of pain and uncontrolled pain. R5's progress notes indicate that this facility ran out of R5's medications twice in the span of four days. R5's care plan does not include any non-pharmacological interventions. Evidenced by: The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU). R1 was a risk for PU development. The facility failed to implement aggressive interventions to prevent PU development. R1 developed a stage 2 PU which worsened to an unstageable PU. The facility failed to ensure R1 had aggressive offloading, failed to complete all physician ordered treatments, and failed to ensure physician prescribed offloading orders were followed. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management undated, states in part: . Definitions: 'Pressure Ulcer/Injury' refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. On 3/9/26, CNA C (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing perineal care to R1. CNA C had R1 positioned on her left side which has paralysis from a stroke and toward the left side of the mattress versus the middle. Per NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator), CNA C turned to get more wipes and removed her hand from R1 for two (2) seconds. R1 fell from the bed onto the floor. R1's fall was unwitnessed as CNA C did not observe R1's fall from bed. R1 was not positioned toward CNA C for added stability nor did R1 have anything to hold onto with her right hand while positioned on her left side. On 3/10/26 an x-ray was obtained indicating No acute fracture or dislocation. On 3/11/26 R1 was sent to the emergency department. A computed tomography (CT) scan indicated a displaced fracture of greater trochanter of right femur (right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility did not provide special assistive eating equipment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R6) reviewed for assistive devices. The facility did not provide R6 with a built-up utensil (adaptive eating tools with thickened handles, designed for residents with limited gripping strength or hand tremors) as indicated per plan of care. Evidenced by: R6 was admitted with diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a neurological disorder affecting movement and muscle tone) and epilepsy (a chronic neurological disorder characterized by seizures causes by abnormal electrical activity in the brain). R6's meal ticket on 4/7/26 (breakfast) states in part, as follows: Built up utensils R6's comprehensive care plan documents as follows: Focus: R6 has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) multiple medical diagnoses including epilepsy (a chronic neurological disorder characterized by seizures causes by abnormal electrical activity in the brain).DM (diabetes mellitus), anxiety; need for therapeutic diet, and need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect the census of 63. DA D (Dietary Aid) was observed stacking wet dishes without allowing them ample time to dry. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled Warewashing, states in part: .All dishware, serviceware, and utensils will be cleaned and sanitized after each use. Procedures 1. The dining services staff will be knowledgeable in the proper technique for processing dirty dishware through the dish machine, and proper handling of sanitized dishware .4. All dishware will be air dried and properly stored. On 2/16/2026 at 1:03 PM, Surveyor observed dishwashing. Surveyor observed DA D (Dietary Aide) remove 10 glass plates, 9 metal plate warmers, and 5 bottom lids for the plate warming system, from the dishwashing rack while still wet from being washed. Surveyor observed DA D stack them on a black cart face up into a stack of plates, a stack of metal plates, and a stack of bottom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not follow through on a recommendation from the Audiologist for hearing aides/amplification for a resident who expressed not being able to hear for 1 (R60) of 24 residents reviewed for hearing. R60 received an order for hearing aids, and this order was not fulfilled. This is evidenced by: Facility policy: Hearing and Vision Services, revised 3/2025 states in part: . Guideline: It is the guideline of the facility to ensure all residents have access to hearing services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Schizophrenia, and Major Depressive Disorder. R60's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/26/2025, indicated that resident has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14, which indicates the resident's cognition is intact. R60 does not have a care plan related to hearing loss. On 02/16/2026 at 3:26 PM Surveyor interviewed R60 during initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that: (i) The agreement is explained to the resident and his or her representative in a form and manner that he or she understands, including in a language the resident and his or her representative understands; (ii) The resident or his or her representative acknowledges that he or she understands the agreement for 2 of 2 Residents (R2 and R72) reviewed for arbitration agreements. R2 indicated the arbitration agreement was not fully explained and he/she would not have signed if he/she knew there would no longer be the right to use the judicial system to resolve a dispute with the facility.R72 indicated the arbitration agreement was not fully explained and he/she would not have signed if he/she knew there would no longer be the right to use the judicial system to resolve a dispute with the facility.Evidenced by:The facility's Binding Arbitration Agreements policy, dated 12/12/24, states, in part: This facility asks all residents to enter into an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that every resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 1 (R4) of 6 sampled residents. R4 prefers staff to wear a mask when entering his room. Surveyor observed staff entering R4's room without a mask. Evidenced by: The facility's Resident Rights admission Document states, in part: . Resident rights. The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. 2. Planning and implementing care. The resident has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including: . b. The right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered care plan, including but not limited to: 4. Respect and dignity.c. The right to reside and receive services in the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for daily living for 1 of 6 sampled Residents (R2).Surveyor observed a commode in R2's room with a brown substance on the seat and arm.Findings Include:The facility policy, Safe and Homelike Environment, revised 7/1/25, indicates, in part: Guideline: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment.Definitions: . Sanitary includes, but is not limited to, preventing the spread of disease-causing organisms by keeping resident care equipment clean and properly stored. Resident care equipment includes, but is not limited to, equipment used in completion of the activities of daily living.R2 was admitted on [DATE]. R2's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 11/13/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 00, indicating R2 is severely cognitively impaired. On 12/15/25 at 10:13AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of all investigations of alleged violations were reported to the resident or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 2 Facility Reported Incidents reviewed.An initial Facility Reported Incident alleging possible misappropriation of property was submitted to the State Agency on 12/7/25. The facility submitted the results of their internal investigation to the State Agency on 12/15/25, which is outside of the required timeframe of 5 working days.This is evidenced by:The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation with a review date of 5/25 states in part: .It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.Reporting/Response.B. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents. Surveyor observed left over food items not properly covered, labeled, or dated. Surveyor observed cleanliness concerns in main kitchen. Surveyor observed staff in kitchen not wearing beard restraints. Surveyor observed food being stored on the floor in the dry storage, walk in refrigerator, and walk in freezer. Surveyor observed staff touching the inside surface of a container used to hold food with their bare hands. Surveyor observed staff prepare food without using a recipe. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Food Preparation Guidelines, dated 12/17/24, includes: The cook, or designee, shall prepare menu items following the facility's written menus and standardized recipes. The facility's policy Date Marking for Food Safety, dated 5/26/24, includes: The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect 3 of 6 hallways. Surveyor observed 2 staff members incorrectly wearing PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) on the Covid-19 positive hallway. RN V (Registered Nurse) did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Personal Protective Equipment, dated 6/11/25, includes: This facility promotes appropriate use of personal protective equipment to prevent the transmission of pathogens to residents, visitors, and other staff. Personal protective equipment, or PPE, refers to a variety of barriers used alone or in combination to protect mucous membranes, skin, and clothing from contact with infections agents. It includes gloves, gowns, face protection (facemasks, goggles, and face shields), and respiratory protection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: 2Number of residents cited: 1Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 2 residents (R48) reviewed for self-administration of medications. Surveyor observed R48 to have a cup of medications left on her bedside table on her meal tray for her to take independently. R48 did not have an assessment for self-administration of medications and did not have an active physician's order. R48's care plan does not indicate R48 can self-administer medications. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Resident Self-Administration of Medication dated 4/17/25, includes it is the guideline of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely. Each resident is offered the opportunity to self-administer medications during the routine assessment by licensed nurse and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that every resident had an Advance Directive, including Code Status (Do Not Resuscitate or Full Code (resuscitate)), this affected 1 of 21 residents (R58).R58 did not have a code status determination in her medical record.This is evidenced by:The Facilities Policy and Procedure entitled Resident's Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives dated [DATE], documents in part: 1. On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive .9. Any decision making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to the interdisciplinary team and staff responsible for the resident's care .R58 admitted to the facility [DATE], went out to the hospital [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility [DATE]. R58 has the following diagnoses: acute and chronic respiratory failure with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (R53 and R85). R53 began smoking at the facility and was not assessed to be a safe, independent smoker once the facility was aware R53 began smoking. R85 was assessed to be at risk for falls. The facility did not assure that the care plan interventions were in place for R85. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Smoking dated 12/15/23 states in part .6. Residents who smoke will be further evaluated using the Smoking Evaluation to determine supervision need and intervention.10. All safe smoking measures will be documented on the care plan and communicated to all staff, visitors, and volunteers who will be responsible for supervising residents while smoking. Supervision will be provided as indicated on the care plan.15. Documentation to support decision making will be included in the medical record, including but not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure the provision of routine biologicals for 1 of 9 residents observed for medication pass (R15). RN V (Registered Nurse) did not prime R15's insulin pen prior to administering 2 units of insulin. Evidence by:Facility policy entitled 'insulin pen,' states in part: .it is the guideline of this facility to use insulin pens in order to improve the accuracy of insulin dosing provide increased resident comfort and serve as a teaching aid to prepare residents for self-administration of insulin therapy upon discharge. Explanation and compliance guidelines: .2. Insulin pens must be clearly labeled with the resident name, physician name, date dispensed, type of insulin, amount to be given, frequency and expiration date.6. insulin pens will be primed prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the insulin reservoir.9. insulin pens should be disposed of after 28 days or according to manufacturer's recommendations. 11. Procedure: .e. Check the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food allergies, intolerances and preferences were accommodated and/or individualized meal tickets were followed for 2 residents (R90 and R70) reviewed for food allergies/intolerances. R90 is allergic to eggs and milk. Staff served R90 an egg muffin sandwich and offered milk for breakfast on 8/21/25. R70 is lactose intolerant. Staff did not provide a milk alternative on 8/21/25. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Food Preparation Guidelines, dated 12/17/24, includes: It is the policy of this facility to prepare foods in a manner to preserve or enhance a resident's nutrition and hydration status. Staff shall accommodate resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, providing appropriate alternatives when needed. The facility's policy Menus and Adequate Nutrition, dated 5/26/24, includes: The facility will provide residents with nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diets that meet his or her daily nutritional and special…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 66 residents. Nutritional supplements were observed without the appropriate thaw dates. Dietary staff did not report when the dishwasher did not reach the necessary PPM (Parts Per Million). Findings include: Example 1 On 3/5/25 at 10:42 AM, Surveyor observed 7 Sysco Mighty Shakes in one of the facility kitchen's refrigerators. The shakes were completely thawed and did not have any thaw dates noted. The shakes state on the container that they need to be discarded within 14 days of being thawed. On 3/5/25 at 10:43 AM, Surveyor interviewed DM V (Dietary Manager) who stated that she thought the shakes were dated when pulled from the freezer but noted they had not been. Example 2 The facility uses a low-temperature, sanitizing dishwasher. A document, titled, Dish Machine Temperature Log, hangs near the dishwasher and states that the PPM for the chlorine needs to be 50-100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This has the ability to affect all 66 residents. Garbage and litter was found near the facility's main dumpster area. Findings include On 3/5/25 at 10:31 AM, Surveyor observed in the facility's main exterior garbage area, along with DM V (Dietary Manager), 13 used gloves strewn around the two dumpsters, two bags of garbage lying on the ground (one was halfway lodged under one of the dumpsters), and what appeared to be hundreds of cigarette butts on the ground. At this time, Surveyor interviewed DM V who stated that the garbage had been there for over a week and needed to be removed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility-wide assessment developed by the facility included all relevant details to ensure the facility provided care and services to residents to meet their individual needs within the facility's identified resources. This has the potential to affect all 66 residents residing at the facility. The facility assessment must reflect the resident population, the resources needed to care for this population as well as staff competencies to care for the resident population residing within the facility. The facility has several residents who do not speak English as their primary language, the staff did not have the competencies to communicate with these residents or to ensure their ethnic, cultural, and activity needs were being met. The facility has residents who require dialysis; the staff did not have the skill set or competencies to care for residents post dialysis. The facility has an infection prevention and control program (ICIP) however several breaches were identified within the IPCP; the Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for daily living for 1 of 24 sampled Residents (R51), 2 of 2 supplemental residents (R424 & R67) and 5 of 6 shower rooms. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents in the facility. Surveyor observed R51's footboard on her bed and the wall next to her bed to contain many dried particles and not homelike. R424 and R67 voiced concerned about the shower cleanliness. Surveyor observed 5 out of 6 shower rooms as being unkept with visible black and brown substance in the shower area. As evidenced by: The facility policy, Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 10/23/24, indicates, in part, as follows: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment . Environment refers to any environment in the facility that is frequented by residents, including, (but not limited to) the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a review of the residents' total program of care to include signing monthly physician orders were completed for 9 of 11 residents (R17, R9, R20, R65, R6, R24, R2, R25, and R61) reviewed. R17 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R9 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R20 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R65 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R6 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R24 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R2 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R25 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. R61 did not have Physician Orders signed monthly. This is evidenced by: The Facilities Policy and Procedure entitle Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 10/16/24 documents the following, in part: f. Remind the physician to date and sign all orders .2. The Physician should .c. Review the resident's total program of care including medications and treatments at each visit . Example 1 R17 had no signed Physician Orders for October…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for 4 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed. CNA ZZ did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. CNA AAA did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. CNA BBB did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. CNA CCC did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. This is evidence by: The Facilities Policy and Procedure entitled Annual Employee Evaluation dated 5/2/23 documents, in part: Purpose: To comply with federal regulations, all employees will receive an annual evaluation of their work performance . Example 1 CNA ZZ's hire date was 11/28/22. CNA ZZ did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. Example 2 CNA AAA's hire date was 12/29/22. CNA AAA did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. Example 3 CNA BBB's hire date was 9/28/21. CNA BBB did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. Example 4 CNA CCC's hire date was 10/11/22. CNA CCC did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 2 sampled residents (R25) and 1 of 1 (R7) supplemental residents reviewed for self- administration of medications. R7 was observed during medication administration to have his medications put into a Mighty Shake and left with R7 in the dining room to take independently. R7 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications. R25 was observed to have a cup of medications left on her bedside table for her to take independently. R25 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Self- Administration of Medication dated 5/1/24 states in part, .3. When determining if self- administration is clinically appropriate for a resident, the interdisciplinary team should, at a minimum consider the following: a. The medications appropriate and safe for self- administration; b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately notify and consult with the resident's physician when a change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status occurred for 1 of 24 residents (R71) reviewed for change in condition. R71 was was sent to the ED (Emergency Department) with a change in condition. The ED documented, Skin: Severe candidal rash around SP (suprapubic) cath (catheter) and into bilateral groin. R71 was diagnosed with Candidiasis intertrigo (a fungal infection that occurs in skin folds) involving the groin and area around SP (suprapubic) catheter and prescribed Nystatin. The facility did not document the rash nor notify the provider. As evidenced by The facility policy, Notification of Change, dated 10/24/23, documents, in part, as follows: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to document, investigate, and resolve grievances a resident may have for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for grievances (R73). R73 and her family voiced grievances to the facility. The facility did not complete appropriate interviews, audits, education, or provide follow up with to R73 or her family after the conclusion of the investigation. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident and Family Grievances, no date, states in part .10. Procedure: .d. The Grievance Official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance, and those actions, on the grievance form. i. Steps to resolve the grievance may involve forwarding the grievance to department manager for follow up .g. In accordance with the resident's rights to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the Grievance Official will issue a written decision on the grievance to the resident or representative at the conclusion of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility must ensure the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status, this affected 2 of 20 residents (R17 and R8) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS). R17's most recent MDS indicates that R17 is receiving hospice services. R17 has not signed up for nor received hospice services. R8's MDS indicated that R8 had a pressure injury. R8 has not had a pressure injury since being admitted to the facility. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion dated 1/18/23 states in part: Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan .4. Care Plan Team Responsibility for Assessment Completion: a. Interdisciplinary Responsibility for Completion of MDS Sections: i. The responsibility of all sections of the MDS will be clearly assigned .ii. Persons completing part of the assessment must attest to the accuracy of the section they have completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 20 residents (R51) reviewed for ADLs. R51 is scheduled to receive a shower on Mondays and Thursdays. The facility has no documentation that R51 was offered or declined a shower on the following dates: 2/6/25, 2/24/25, 3/3/25, and 3/6/25. Evidenced by: R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the following: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, delusional disorders, restlessness and agitation. R51's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R51 is severely cognitively impaired. R51 has an Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care (APOAHC). R51's comprehensive care plan documents the following: (Date Initiated: 8/14/23) Focus: The resident has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Dementia. Goal: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This has the potential to affect 1 of 21 sampled residents (R74) reviewed for activities. R74 does not speak English, Spanish only. Facility does not offer R74 activities appropriate for R74's culture/ethnicity. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Activities, dated 12/23/22, states, in part: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. Definitions: Activities refer to any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the residents environment remained free of accidents and hazards for 1 of 7 residents (R61) reviewed for accidents. Surveyor observed R61's bed was not in the lowest position and staff reported the bed was broken. Surveyor observed R61's fall mats and call light not in place. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Accidents and Supervision, dated 12/22, states, in part; .The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents .3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) . R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, stroke, anxiety disorder, and other seizures. R61's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/5/25, indicates R61 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating R61 is severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 2 residents (R65) reviewed for catheters as catheter bags were observed to be uncovered and resting on the floor. Surveyor observed R65's indwelling urinary catheter bag to be resting in direct contact with the floor. Evidenced by: The Centers of Disease Control and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee - Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009 indicate in part: . III. Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance . B. Maintain unobstructed urine flow. 1. Keep the catheter and collecting tube free from kinking. 2. Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. R65 was admitted to the facility 11/4/24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the following: cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who requires dialysis receives such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R24) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to provide ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. The facility staff were not fluent in the emergency plan for a resident bleeding from their dialysis fistula site. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Hemodialysis with an implementation date of 2/15/23, includes, in part: Policy: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were seen by a physician or physician extender (NP- Nurse Practitioner, PA- Physician Assistant) for 3 of 11 residents (R9, R20, and R2) reviewed. R9 did not have Provider visits timely. R20 did not have Provider visits timely. R2 did not have Provider visits timely. This is evidenced by: The Facilities Policy and Procedure entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 10/16/24 documents, in part: .h. Ensure a progress note is present to reflect the date and time of the physician visit, an indication as to whether new orders were written or no new orders were received and any special discussions between the resident and/or family and physician during the visit .2. The Physician should .d. Date, write and sign progress note for each visit .h. At the option of the physician, required visits in SNFs (Skilled Nursing Facilities), after the initial visit, may alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility does not have nursing staff with the appropriate cultural competencies to communicate effectively while providing care to residents with communication needs and ensuring that devices are utilized per the care plan. This has the potential to affect 2 of 20 sampled residents (R74 & R423) and 1 of 12 supplemental residents (R9). The Facility does not ensure R74 is receiving communication in a language she can understand. The Facility does not ensure R423 is receiving communication in a language she can understand. The Facility does not ensure R9 is receiving communication in a language she can understand. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Non-Discrimination-Language Assistance Services, dated 2/1/25, states, in part: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to take reasonable steps to ensure that individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) (including companions with LEP) are not discriminated against and have access to language…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they followed their antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 2 of 10 sampled Residents (R11 and R21) and 1 of 1 supplemental (R73) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. R73 was treated with an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection (UTI) and urinalysis (UA) showed R73 did not have a UTI. R11 and R21 were treated prophylactically with antibiotics. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated 12/23/22, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. Policy Explanation and Compliance: . 1a. Infection Preventionist- coordinates all antibiotic stewardship activities, maintains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision, monitoring, and evaluation for 2 of 4 sampled residents (R2 and R3) after the residents had a fall. R2 had a fall on 11/1/24 at 1:00 PM (day shift). The facility did not document post-fall clinical findings or new fall intervention effectiveness after R2's fall. R3 had a fall on 10/28/24 at 4:55 PM (evening shift). The facility did not document relevant post-fall clinical findings or new fall intervention effectiveness after R3's fall. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Accidents and Supervision dated 12/29/22, states, in part: .Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents . Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary . Ensuring the interventions are put into action . Monitoring and Modification - Monitoring is the process of evaluating the effectiveness of care plan interventions. Modification is the process of adjusting interventions as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 of 19 residents (R4) were treated with respect and dignity. The facility did not provide laundry services timely for R4. R4's personal laundry was in the laundry department for three weeks before being returned to R4. Evidenced by: The Resident Rights in the facility's admission packet, states, in part: . Resident rights. The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility . 4. Respect and dignity. The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including: . b. The right to retain and use personal possessions, including furnishings, and clothing, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents. c. The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, except when to do so would endanger the health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately consult with a resident's physician or update resident's guardian when there was a change in resident's condition and need to alter treatment for 1 resident (R4) out of 3 reviewed for notification of changes. R4 was sent to the emergency department on 5/4/24 and R4's guardian was not immediately notified. R4 had three falls on 5/11/24 and R4's guardian was not notified of one of those falls. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Notification of Changes, dated 10/22/23, states, in part: . Policy: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification . Compliance Guidelines: The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstances requiring notification include: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on photographic evidence and interview, the facility failed to keep residents' personal health information confidential for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for health information (R18). R18's private health care information was found in R4's room. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Confidential of Personal and Medical Records, dated 5/15/24, states, in part: . Policy: This facility honors the resident's right to secure and confidential personal and medical records. This includes the right to confidentiality of all information contained in a resident's records, regardless of the form of storage or location of the record. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. Keep confidential is defined as safeguarding the content of information including written documentation, video, audio, or other computer stored information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the individual and/or the individual's surrogate or representative . 8. Paper notes or reminders with resident's personal or medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident had a baseline care plan developed and implemented, within 48 hours, with needed instructions to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 of 18 residents (R3) reviewed. R3 did not have a baseline care plan completed. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Baseline Care Plan, dated 11/2023, states in part: the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of the residence admission, will include the minimum health care information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to: initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy orders, social services, and PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) recommendations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 residents (R4 & R15) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) out of a total sample of 19 received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene. R4 did not receive weekly scheduled showers in April, May, and June 2024. R15 did not receive weekly showers as scheduled in April, May, and June 2024. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Activities of Daily Living, undated, states, in part: Policy: The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs (activities of daily living) do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Cares and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care . 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible. This affected 2 of 19 sampled residents (R5 and R14) R5's electric wheelchair charges in her room with her roommate, R14, also present. This is evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Power Mobility Device, reviewed 1/1/24, includes, in part: Battery charging installations shall be located in areas designated for that purpose . Example 1 R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/7/24, indicates R5 is impaired on both sides of her upper and lower extremities and utilizes an electric wheelchair for mobility. On 6/18/24 at 3:21 PM, Surveyor observed R5's wheelchair power charging cable plugged in next to her nightstand. R5 demonstrated to Surveyor that she was able to charge it without assistance of staff. R5 confirmed that she always charges her wheelchair in her room using the cord currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 2 R5 consistently takes her as needed (PRN) Hydromorphone every 4 hours for breakthrough pain. The facility ran out of R5's hydromorphone. R5's progress notes indicate that this facility ran out of R5's medications twice in the span of four days. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include: multiple sclerosis (degenerative disorder causing nerve damage which leads to paralysis, vision loss, fatigue, and mood disturbance) , sickle cell disorder with acute chest syndrome (red blood cells become crescent-shaped causing severe pain with occlusion of arteries and veins around the lungs), idiopathic aseptic necrosis of right femur (death of bone tissue related to loss of blood supply), idiopathic aseptic necrosis of left femur, and other chronic pain. R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/7/24 includes a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating that she is cognitively intact. R5's Physician Orders, active as of 6/18/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of elevated blood glucose levels for 1 of 3 residents (Resident (R) 9) reviewed for diabetes in a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring, indicated, Report critical test results to physician timely. Review of R9's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 01/12/24 with medical diagnoses that included type 1 diabetes. Review of R9's Orders, dated 01/12/24 and located in the EMR under the Orders tab, indicated, Call MD [Medical Doctor] if BGL [blood glucose level] less than 70 or greater than 350. Review of R9's Blood Sugar Summary, located in the EMR under the Wts [weights] and Vitals tab revealed a blood glucose level of 421 mg/dl [milligrams per deciliter] on 02/24/24. Review of R9's February Medication Administration Record [MAR] located in the EMR under the Orders tab revealed no indication of physician notification.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of the resident's property when Registered Nurse (RN)1 diverted the resident's Oxycodone for 1 of 6 residents (Resident (R) 19) reviewed for misappropriation in a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, indicated, The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: a. Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Review of R19's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 06/29/21 with medical diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome and diabetes. Review of R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/16/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13 out of 15, indicating R5 was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 (R1) of three residents reviewed for food storage. Surveyor observed 6 unopened Magic Shakes on R1's windowsill. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Food Safety Requirements, dated 3/20/23, states in part: . 1. Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of the food to the resident. Elements of the process include the following: . b. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms . According to https://www.hormelhealthlabs.com/wp-content/uploads/HHL-Code-Date_Handling-Sheet-11_2022.pdf Mighty Shakes Shelf Life: Unopened: 15 months (450 days) frozen, refrigerated: 14 days thawed. Opened/bedside: Up to 2 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure for 9 of 12 residents (R12, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R13, R14, and R15), each resident received food with at a palatable temperature. Residents have voiced concerns related to cold food. Test tray found food was not served hot. Evidenced by Facility policy, Record of Food Temperatures, revised 12/1/23, states, as follows: It is the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperature(s) before trays are assembled. 2. Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater. 4. Potentially hazardous cold food temperatures will be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility has dining in two (2) dining rooms and residents also eat in their rooms. The facility serves the dining rooms first and then delivers trays to the wings in the following order: 1. [NAME] 2. Birch 3. Aspen 4. Cedar 5. Elm 6. Pine The facility documents: All wings will be served between the times of 12:00 - 12:30 PM. Surveyor requested a room test tray after all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices in 1 of 6 residents reviewed (R3). R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not have all medications administered documented. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Medication Administration, with a reviewed/revised date of 12/4/23, indicates, in part: .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .11. Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc) with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route and time .17. Sign MAR after administered . R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: schizophrenia, weakness, and other specified forms of tremors. R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a target date of 10/26/23, documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating R5 has a severe cognitive impairment. R3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain personal privacy during personal cares for 1 of 4 residents (R4). The facility updated R4's care plan to include Cares in Pairs so there are 2 staff in the room. R4 voiced that he does not like non-direct care staff in his room during cares. CNA D (Certified Nursing Assistant) pulled non-care staff to the room to be the second person, including Hskp E (Housekeeper), SS F (Social Services), and Rec G (Receptionist). Hskp E, SS F and Rec G stated, they all have been in R4's room as the second person when R4 is either using the urinal or commode. Hskp E and SW F indicated they are uncomfortable being the second person during cares. Evidenced by: R4's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: chronic pain syndrome, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, severe morbid obesity, sensorineural hearing loss, and repeated falls. R4's is his own person and is cognitively intact. R4's Certified Nursing Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (R4). R4's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was blank on 8/21/23 for Novolog administration and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) was blank on 8/12/23 for wound care. Evidenced by: The facility policy Medication Administration, undated, states, as follows: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards or practice Review MAR to identify medication to be administered. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. Sign MAR after administered. R4 was admitted to the facility 6/29/21, with diagnoses including, but not limited to: type 2 diabetes mellitus, pressure ulcer of sacral region and acute kidney failure. R4 is his own person and is his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$289,198 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $177,862 — penalty dated 2025-03-25
  • $16,055 — penalty dated 2024-08-27
  • $80,580 — penalty dated 2024-06-19
  • $14,701 — penalty dated 2023-12-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-17 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burlington Health and Rehabilitation CenterBurlington, WI 1 of 5Lyonsview Health And Rehabilitation CenterKnoxville, TN 1 of 5Manahawkin Health And Rehabilitation CenterManahawkin, NJ 1 of 5Suring Health and Rehab CenterSuring, WI 1 of 5Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 2 of 5Avondale Health and Rehabilitation Center, LLCHumboldt, TN 2 of 5Beloit Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, WI 2 of 5Eastview Health and Rehabilitation CenterAntigo, WI 2 of 5Highlands Health And Rehabilitation CenterMemphis, TN 2 of 5Muskego Health and Rehabilitation CenterMuskego, WI 2 of 5North Ridge Health and Rehabilitation CenterManitowoc, WI 2 of 5Oconto Health and Rehab CenterOconto, WI 2 of 5Riverside Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCTrenton, NJ 2 of 5Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 3 of 5Monroe Health And Rehabilitation CenterMadisonville, TN 3 of 5Patriot Health and Rehabilitation CenterParis, TN 4 of 5Dyersburg Health And Rehabilitation CenterDyersburg, TN 4 of 5Nu Roc Health and Rehabilitation CTRLaona, WI 4 of 5Okeena Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCDyersburg, TN 4 of 5St Ann Health and Rehabilitation CenterMilwaukee, WINot rated (Special Focus)Medical Suites at Oak Creek (The)Oak Creek, WI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BAY AT BELMONT HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/13/2021
RUVEL, MENACHEMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022
WEINBERG, YISROELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 31%Medicare 9%Other / private 61%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,040per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$367per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525074. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next