No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation Center

8400 Sheridan Rd, Kenosha, WI 53143 · For profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (262) 658-4141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (262) 658-4141 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8207 22nd Avenue
Pharmacy
2207 80th St · (262) 658-3731 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3207 80th St · (262) 694-7200 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1700 84th Place · (262) 653-8040 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms58.6%5.7%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.5%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.9%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.6%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.5%16.9%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.4%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.0%24.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.3%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine26.0%82.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.2%23.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.9%15.5%12.0%worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.8%CMS range 38.6–67.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.2–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.4–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
42.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 61.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 of 6 residents (R36, R8, R48) reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent residents from sustaining continued falls. * The facility did not complete a fall investigation for a second fall R36 sustained on 2/12/2023 and there was no root cause analysis completed for a fall that occurred on 4/27/2023. On 5/4/23, R36 was noted to have been drinking alcohol and exhibiting intoxicated type behaviors. On 5/4/23, R36 had a fall with a head injury, requiring staples. There was no indication the facility increased supervision and monitoring of R36 when R36 was noted with intoxicated type behaviors. There was no indication if care planned interventions were in place at the time of the fall. * R8 was missing a fall investigation for a fall on 12/31/2022, and the physician was not updated regarding R8's falls until several hours later for falls that occurred on 12/26/2023. * On 5/18/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not notify 2 of 6 (R1 and R5) resident's representatives of the need to transfer to the hospital. R5's representative was not notified when they were transferred to the hospital.R1's representative was not notified when they were transferred to the hospital. Findings include: The facility policy titled Notification of Changes revised12/22/25 documents, .Circumstances requiring notification include: .2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status. This may include: .4. A transfer or discharge of the resident from the facility .1. Competent individuals: a. The facility must still contact the resident's physician and notify the resident's representative, if known .c. When a resident is mentally competent, such a designated family member should be notified of significant changes in the resident's health status because the resident may not be able to notify them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment for 1 (R7) of 4 resident's rooms observed.On 6/15/26 and 6/16/26 food crumbs, paper, and other debris were observed under & around R7's bed and under the bedside dresser.Findings include:On 6/16/26, at 10:12 a.m., Surveyor observed R7 in bed. Surveyor observed under R7's bed near the baseboard there is an accumulation of food crumbs, pieces of paper and other debris. On the floor near the head of R7's bed is a roll of tape. On the floor between the bed and the bedside dresser there is a treatment bottle, multiple straw papers and other debris. Under the bedside dresser there is an accumulation of dust, dirt and other debris.On 6/16/26, at 11:17 a.m., 1:12 p.m., and at 3:10 p.m., Surveyor observed R7's room under the bed as previously observed at 10:12 a.m. On 6/17/26, at 7:57 a.m. and at 12:03 p.m., Surveyor observed R7's room. The debris noted on 6/16/26 remained as previously described. On 6/17/26, at 12:06 p.m., while Surveyor was in R7's room, Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure all allegations involving potential abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 2 Residents (R1 and R2) of 11 sampled residents.A facility reported incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency on 5/8/26 stated that R1 had communicated that R2 had been harassing R1 which included R2 watching R1 when R1 slept. The FRI did not contain staff interviews or statements of who may have witnessed inappropriate behaviors from R2 directed at R1 or other residents.Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure all allegations involving potential abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 2 Residents (R1 and R2) of 11 sampled residents.A facility reported incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency on 5/8/26 stated that R1 had communicated that R2 had been harassing R1which included R2 watching R1 when R1 slept. The FRI did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide a comprehensive care plan for 3 (R1, R2, and R10) of 11 residents reviewed for care plans*R1 had a history of trauma and did not have a comprehensive care plan with person centered interventions for trauma.*R2 had a history of trauma and did not have a comprehensive care plan with person centered interventions for trauma. R2 had been in an intimate relationship with R10 and did not have a comprehensive care plan with person centered interventions for an intimate relationship.*R10 had been in an intimate relationship with R2 and did not have a comprehensive care plan with person centered interventions for an intimate relationshipBased on interview and record review the facility did not provide a comprehensive care plan for 3 (R1, R2, and R10) of 11 sampled residents reviewed for care plans*R1 had a history of trauma and did not have a comprehensive care plan with person centered interventions for trauma.*R2 had a history of trauma and did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 1 (R4) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) assistance received the necessary services to maintain ability to practice good grooming and personal hygiene.*R4 did not receive weekly shower on 1/27/26 and 3/10/26.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Resident Showers last revised 6/11/25 documents 1. Residents will be provided with showers as per request and within reasonable accommodation, or as per facility schedule protocols (at least offered weekly) and based upon resident safety.R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 1/27/26 has a BIMS of 15 which indicates cognitively intact and R4 is not assessed as having any behavior. R4 is assessed as requiring partial/moderate assistance for shower/bath and chair/bed to chair transfer.On 6/16/26 at 9:37 a.m. and at 9:58 a.m., Surveyor spoke with anonymous family members. During these conversations, Surveyor was informed that R4 complained of not receiving showers. Family indicated they spoke to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R3 of R7) of 4 residents had a comprehensive assessment and care plan to either prevent and/or heal pressure injuries.R7 had a deep tissue injury upon admission. On 4/2/26 Wound Physician-G assessed R7's pressure injury as a Stage 3 left buttocks pressure injury and ordered a treatment. The order wasn't picked up until 4/4/26 and was transcribed incorrectly. R7's pressure injury was documented as healed on 4/9/26. There was no update to the care plan to address the potential for impaired skin integrity. The pressure injury reopened on 4/23/26. The facility didn't revise R7's pressure injury care plan nor was there any evidence the facility reviewed the care plan and determined the care plan remained appropriate after R7's pressure injury reopened. R3's admission evaluation on 1/15/26 did not comprehensively assess wounds (skin tear and pressure injury) present upon admission with no documentation of characteristics/description of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide behavioral health services to ensure a resident received the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility did not implement person centered interventions for substance use disorder (SUD) for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for SUDs.Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide behavioral health services to ensure a resident received the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility did not implement person centered interventions for substance use disorder (SUD) for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for SUDs.Findings include:The facility's undated Social Services policy and procedure documented: .k. Identifying and seeking ways to support resident's dignity in full recognition of each resident's individuality.5.The facility should provide social services or obtain needed services from outside entities during situations that include but not limited to the following:c.Abuse of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R1 and R11) of 4 sampled residents reviewed received medically related social services to address individual Resident needs in order to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.*R1and R11were in an intimate relationship and the facility did not complete an Intimate and Sexual History and did not complete a comprehensive care plan with person centered interventions. Findings include:The facility's Social Services undated policy and procedure documented:.2.The facility, regardless of size, will provide medically-related social services to each resident, to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.3.The social worker, will complete an initial and quarterly assessment of each resident, identifying any need for medically-related social services of the resident. Any need for medically-related social services will be documented in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (R4) of 1 sample resident.R4's blood sugar was not monitored to determine whether R4 required Novolog sliding scale three times daily and R4's Lantus 4 units at bedtime was not administered on 2/6/26 and 3/18/26.Findings include:R4's diagnoses include type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and type 1 diabetes mellitus with unspecified diabetic retinopathy without macular edema.R4's physician orders with an order date 1/21/26 documents Lantus Subcutaneous Solution 100 unit/ml (milliliter) (Insulin Glargine) Inject 4 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for DM (diabetes mellitus).R4's physician orders with an order date of 1/21/26 documents Novolog injection solution 100 unit/ml (Insulin Aspart) Inject as per sliding scale: if 0-150 = 0 units; 151-200 = 2 units; 201-250 = 4 units; 251-300 = 6 units; 301-350 = 8 units; 351-400 = 10 units and call MD (medical doctor), subcutaneously with meals for DM.On 6/18/26, at 12:33 p.m., Surveyor reviewed R4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure a resident's physician was promptly notified of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges for 1 (R4) of 1 sample resident.R4's physician was not notified of abnormal laboratory results on 4/10/26 and 4/21/26.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Provider Lab Notification and last revised 05/07/26 under guideline documents It is the expectation of this facility to ensure the timely receipt, review, interpretation, and communication of laboratory results, and prompt notification of the provider (physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist) in accordance with professional standards of practice and resident condition. Under explanation and compliance guidelines documents 1. The facility must promptly notify provider of lab results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges and/or critical labs per ordering physician's orders. Delayed notification may contribute to delays in changing the course of treatment or care plan. 4. If lab results are outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 1 (R7) of 2 Residents.*Staff were not wearing gowns during care observations for R7 who is on EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) and appropriate hand hygiene was not observed during pressure injury treatment. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions and last revised 9/9/25 under guidelines documents It is the guideline of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precaution for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Under explanation and compliance guidelines for 3. Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions documents.b. PPE (personal protective equipment) for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities and may not need to be donned prior to entering the resident's room. 4. High-contact resident care activities include a. Dressing; b. Bathing; c. Transferring; d. Proving hygiene; e.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a registered nurse (RN) worked at the facility for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, on 1 of 30 days reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing at the facility on 12/14/2025. The facility did not have a RN working in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours on 12/14/2025. Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the facility staff scheduled and nurse posting for the last 30 days (December 2025). Surveyor noted on 12/14/2025 (Sunday) there was not a registered nurse (RN scheduled for 8 consecutive hours. On 1/7/2026, at 8:10 AM, Surveyor interviewed scheduler-K who stated scheduler- K completes the staffing schedules and if there is a call-in during scheduler-K's working hours, then scheduler-K would find a replacement. If a call in occurs after hours, weekends, or holidays then the person on call would be responsible for finding coverage. 12/14/2025 was a Sunday, so whoever was on call that day would be responsible for looking at the schedules to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it completed accurate mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform electronic format to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).Staffing information for Quarter 4 (July 1 - September 30, 2025) of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) was not accurately submitted to CMS.This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:The CMS Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2025, documents: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS .1.2 Submission Timelines and Accuracy. Direct care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection. *Infection surveillance for July 2025, did not include date of onset, criteria met, culture, results or treatment (if any) for every listed resident.*Infection surveillance for September 2025, did not include signs/symptoms, criteria met, date of onset, culture taken, resulted organism or date infection resolved for every resident listed.Findings:The facility's undated policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program documents: The designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a consultant to our staff on infectious disease, resident room placement, implementing isolation precautions, staff and resident exposures, surveillance, and epidemiological investigations of exposures of infectious disease. 3. Surveillance: a. A system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 medication refrigerators located in the medication room.*The North unit refrigerator, located in the medication room, did not have a temperature log to ensure proper temperature range.*R3's insulin vial was not stored in the medication refrigerator.Findings:The Facility policy, titled Medication Storage, with a last reviewed date of 11/12/2024, indicated the following: . 6. Refrigerated Products: a. All medications requiring refrigeration are stored in refrigerators located in the pharmacy and in each medication room. b. Temperatures are maintained 36-46 degrees F (Fahrenheit). Charts are kept on each refrigerator and temperature levels recorded daily by the charge nurse or other designee. On 01/08/2026, at 8:40 AM, Surveyor toured the medication room on the North Unit with Director of Nursing (DON)-B. Surveyor noted there was no temperature log for the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not inform residents when changes in coverage was made from Medicare Part A to items and services offered by the facility for which the resident may be charged and the amount of charges for those services by providing the residents with a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and/or the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) for 2 (R23 and R48) of 3 residents reviewed for requiring the NOMNC and SNF ABN to be provided.*R23 was not provided a SNF ABN prior to ending Medicare Part A coverage for services and the NOMNC was emailed to R23's Guardian with no verification of receipt.*R48 was not provided a SNF ABN prior to ending Medicare Part A coverage for services.Findings include:1.) R23 received Medicare Part A coverage for services from 9/6/2025 through 9/13/2025. On 9/11/2025 at 10:58 AM, in the progress notes, Social Service Coordinator (SSC)-I documented R23's Guardian was issued a NOMNC via email. R23's Guardian was provided with the number to call and instructions on how to file an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R9) of 6 resident's reviewed for hospitalization received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and name and address (mailing and email) with telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. In addition, the facility did not ensure R9 and/or their representative received written information on the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility.R9 was transported and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence of a transfer notice or bed hold policy being provided to R9 and or R9's representative. Findings include:The facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice last reviewed/ revised on 5/1/2025 documents: Guideline: It is the guideline of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R12) of 35 residents reviewed had a comprehensive care plan developed and implemented so that residents can attain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.* R12 has a diagnosis of vision loss. R12's care plan for impaired visual function did not include person-centered interventions to address R12's needs.Findings:R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vision loss.R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/18/2025, documents R12 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment; has moderate vision impairment, cannot see newspaper headlines but can identify objects and does not wear glasses.On 01/05/2026, at 11:25 AM, Surveyor interviews R12 who complains of being blind and needs mail read to her, which staff is not doing.Surveyor reviewed the facility provided document, titled Care Plan Report for R12 and noted a focus area for impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure injuries for 1 (R1) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries.R1's heels were observed to be directly on the mattress and not offloaded according to R1's plan of care.Findings include:The facility policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Management last reviewed/revised on 12/3/2024 documents: Policy: This facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries . 4. Interventions for Prevention and to Promote Healing: a. After completing a thorough assessment/evaluation, the interdisciplinary team shall develop a relevant care plan that includes measurable goals for prevention and management of pressure injuries with appropriate interventions. c. Evidenced- based interventions for prevention will be implemented for all residents who are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 (R30) resident reviewed for accidents.*R30 was observed self-transferring from R30's bed to wheelchair.Findings:R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body).R30 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicates R30 has ok long and short term memory, has impairment on one side of upper and lower extremities, requires substantial/maximal assistance with lying to sitting, substantial/maximal assistance with sit to stand, substantial/maximal assistance from bed to chair transfer and has had 1 fall since admission to the Facility.Surveyor reviewed the Facility's provided document titled SBAR Communication Form and Progress Note dated 3/1/2025. Surveyor noted R30 sustained a unwitnessed fall while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 (R33) of 1 resident receiving oxygen therapy.*R33's oxygen was observed during the survey to be set at 4.5L (liter)/minute without humidification. R33's physician orders is for oxygen to be administered at 3L/minute.Findings include:The Facility's policy, titled Oxygen Administration, with a last reviewed date of 10/8/2024, indicates the following, . 1. Oxygen is administered under orders of the attending physician, except in the case of an emergency. a. Nasal Cannula- Oxygen is administered through plastic cannulas in the nostrils. Effective for low oxygen concentrations less than 40%. Requires humidification at flow rates greater than 4 liters/minute.R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis.On 01/05/2026, at 9:57 AM, Surveyor observed R33 in bed with a nasal cannula in place for oxygen administration. Surveyor observed R33's oxygen concentrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication rate was below 5 percent in 1 (R5) of 5 residents observed receiving medications. The facility medication error rate was 12 percent.*R5 had medications that were not administered in the correct method per the facility policy and procedure and current standards of practice.ASMP Medication Safety Alert, Preventing errors when preparing and administering medications via enteral feeding tubes, November 17, 2022, Volume 27, Issue 23, . Wrong administration technique. Common inappropriate administration techniques include: 1) mixing multiple medications together to give at once.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration via Enteral Tube dated 1/1/2026 documents: . 6. Each medication will be administered separately, not combined or added to an enteral feeding formula. 7. A physician's order and Pharmacist review is required if medications are 'cocktailed' (combined) and will speak to both risk and benefit of combining medications for administration. 12.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Pneumococcal immunizations were offered, or refused, as eligible to residents. This was observed for 1(R30) of 5 residents whose immunization records were reviewed.* R30 did not have documentation of the Influenza vaccine being offered and did not have risk versus benefits were offered after a refusal. Findings:The facility's undated policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, documents: . 7. Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization: . c. Education will be provided to the residents and/or representatives regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations prior to offering the vaccines. e. Documentation will reflect the education provided and details regarding whether or not the resident received the immunizations. R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes Aphasia (a language disorder from brain damage), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained documentation related to COVID-19 immunizations for 1 (R30) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations.*R30's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R19 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization.Findings include:The facility's policy undated policy and titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program documents: . 8. COVID-19 Immunization: . f. Documentation will reflect the education provided and details regarding whether or not the resident or staff received the vaccine. R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Aphasia (a language disorder from brain damage), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body).R30's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents that R30 has ok long- and short-term memory, is able to recall current season, location of own room, staff names/faces, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect residents from resident-to-resident abuse for five (Residents (R)1, R6, R19, R12 and R11) of 20 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to create an environment where other residents had the potential to be abused. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Neglect and Exploitation revised 12/22/24 revealed . The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse . 1. Review of R2's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included dementia. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/19/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one out of 15 which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R1's Face Sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure reportable allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency (SA) in a timely manner and failed to notify the police of the abuse allegation for three residents (Resident (R)5, R8 and R11) of five residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 20. Findings include: 1. Review of R11's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/07/25 in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab revealed R11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and pulmonary fibrosis. R11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated R11 was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's investigation into the incident revealed that on 01/04/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 heard agency Certified Nurse Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of abuse allegations for three residents (Residents (R)1, R6, and R8) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility demonstrated their lack of knowledge in completing a thorough investigation, which had the potential to increase a resident's risk of abuse throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Neglect and Exploitation revised 12/22/24 revealed, . Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g. law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframe's .An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports abuse, neglect or exploitation occur .Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. 1. Review of R2's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one resident [(R)4] of 20 after a change in the resident's medication self-administration status. This failure had the potential for the resident's need to be not known by nursing staff. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans revised 05/01/25 revealed: It is the guideline of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .5. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment . Review of the policy titled Resident Self-Administration of Medication revised 04/17/25 revealed: It is the guideline of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to inform a family member of care conferences and/or provide sufficient notice in advance of care conferences for one of three residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for care planning out of a total sample of 13. This had the potential to affect the family member's right to have input into the development of the resident's care plan. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning-Resident Participation (Care Conference), dated 09/18/24, revealed, . The facility will honor the resident's choice in individuals to be included in the care planning process .The facility will make an effort to schedule the conference at the best time of the day for the resident/resident's representative .If the participation of the resident and/or resident representative is determined not practicable for the development of the resident's care plan, an explanation will be documented in the resident's medical record . Review of R3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide nail care to one of three residents (Resident (R) 12) reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R12 had fingernails that extended approximately one-half inch beyond the tips of his fingers and required staff assistance in trimming them. This failure caused R12 to have unmet personal hygiene needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Nail Care revealed, . Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis . Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule . Nail care will be provided between scheduled occasions as the need arises . The resident's plan of care will identify . The frequency of nail care to be provided . The type of nail care to be provided . The person(s) responsible for providing nail care . Review of R12's Profile tab of the electronic medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were ordered and treatments provided for two of four residents (Resident (R) 12 and R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 13. This failure put R12 and R2 at risk for deterioration of their pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Management revealed, . This facility is committed to . provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries . 1. Review of a hospital facsimile, dated 09/06/24, located under the Documents tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), and addressed to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), revealed, . Wound care notes for [R12] . Plan: Wound care . Left and right buttocks wounds: Cleansed liberally with wound cleanser and gauze, pat dry. Apply 3M No Sting skin barrier to surrounding skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of current standards of practice, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for enteral feedings out of a total sample of 13 received appropriate care and services to prevent complications. This failure had the potential to cause increased risk of infection for R3. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, dated 08/21/24, revealed, . It is a policy of this facility to utilize feeding tubes in accordance with current clinical standards of practice, with interventions to prevent complications to the extent possible . Review of the Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, located at https://www.nutritioncare.org/uploadedFiles/01_Site_Directory/Guidelines_and_Clinical_Resources/EN_Pathway/Boullata_et_al-2016-Journal_of_Parenteral_and_Enteral_Nutrition.pdf, revealed, . Practice Recommendations . standardize the labels for all EN [enteral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration for two of three residents (Resident (R) 5 and R2) reviewed for medication availability out of a total sample of 13. R5 did not have pain medication available to treat pain and R2 did not receive cefepime, an antibiotic, for 22 hours after admission to the facility. This had the potential to cause uncontrolled pain for R5 and increased risk of infection complications for R2. Findings include: 1. Review of R5's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spondylosis without myelopathy and polyosteoarthritis. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/22/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R5 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of R5's Progress Notes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to serve food that was served at an appetizing temperature for one of three residents (Resident (R) 5) reviewed for food palatability out of a total sample of 13. This failure had the potential for R5 to have unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Preparation Guidelines, dated 10/24/22, revealed, . It is the policy of this facility to prepare foods in a manner to preserve or enhance a resident's nutrition and hydration status . Food and drinks shall be palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature . Strategies to ensure resident satisfaction include . Serving hot foods/drinks hot . Review of R5's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spondylosis without myelopathy and polyosteoarthritis. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to perform pressure ulcer treatments in a manner to prevent potential cross contamination for one of four residents (Resident (R) 12) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 13. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 took the treatment cart into the resident's room while performing the treatment and placed unused supplies back into the cart after the treatment was performed. This placed any residents requiring treatments at risk for cross-contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 05/16/23, revealed, . This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines . All staff shall assume that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that a plan of care was developed based on the findings of the comprehensive assessment for 1 (R11) of 1 resident reviewed for hearing loss. The facility did not develop a plan of care that addresses R11's hearing loss or interventions of wearing or the refusal of wearing hearing aids. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change no date indicated documents: The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary . 2. Procedure for reviewing and revising the care plan: . b. The minimum data set (MDS) Coordinator and the Interdisciplinary team will discuss the resident condition and collaborate on intervention options. d. The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. e. Staff involved in the care of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R52) of 3 residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications ordered on an as needed (PRN) basis. On 8/1/2024 R52 was prescribed Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 mg every eight hours PRN without an end date. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Unnecessary Drugs- Without adequate indication for Use no date indicated documents: It is the facility's policy that each resident's drug regimen is managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being free from unnecessary drugs. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. The attending physician will assume leadership in medication management by developing, monitoring, and modifying the medication regimen in collaboration with residents and/or representatives, other professionals, and the interdisciplinary team. Each resident's drug regimen will be reviewed on an ongoing basis, taking into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that it maintained a medication error rate below 5 percent during observations of medication administration affecting 2 (R9 and R24) of 3 residents observed. Three medication errors were observed out of twenty-eight opportunities, for a total error rate of 10.71 %. * R9 was administered levothyroxine after breakfast and not on an empty stomach per medication guidelines and R9 was Administered Timolol Maleate eye drops after their manufacturers instructions of discarding them 4 weeks after opening. * R24 was administered 150 milligrams (MG) of Venlafaxine immediate release when she was ordered to have 150 MG of extended release Venlafaxine. Findings include: 1.) R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Hypothyroidism and Glaucoma. On 8/21/24 at 9:22 AM, the Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) -C administer medication to R9. R9 was observed coming back to her room after eating breakfast. LPN-C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R24) was free of significant medication errors. * R24 was administered 150 milligrams (MG) of Venlafaxine immediate release when she was ordered to have 150 MG of extended release Venlafaxine. Findings include: R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression. On 8/22/24 at 8:35 AM, the Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) -D administer medication to R24. LPN-C poured Venlafaxine 37.5 MG from R24's medication card. LPN-D then indicated she did not have the additional 150 MG of Venlafaxine and would get it from the back up medication supply. LPN-D then came back to the medication cart and indicated she was instructed to give 4 more immediate release tablets from R24's medication card to equal an extra 150 MG of Venlafaxine. LPN-D then administered R24 a total of five 37.5 MG tablets of Venlafaxine to R24. Immediately after the observation, R24's current physicians orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-22 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and facility job description review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified full-time staff with the required certification and skill sets was employed to serve as Food Service Manger (FSM) for 52 of 53 census residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated job description titled Food Service Manager revealed: Overview: The primary purpose of your job position is to assist the Dietitian in planning, organizing, developing and directing the overall operation of the Food Services Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that quality nutritional services are provided on a daily basis and that the Food Services Department is maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Qualifications: Graduate of an accredited course in dietetic training approved by the American Dietetic Association Minimum of two (2) years' experience in a supervisory capacity in a hospital, nursing care facility, or other related medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents and their resident representatives (Resident (R)1 and R14) reviewed for facility initiated emergent hospital transfer, from a total sample of 32 residents, were provided with written transfer/discharge notice that stated the reason for transfer, the place of transfer, and other information regarding the transfer. This failure had the potential to affect the resident and their Resident Representative (RR) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge including AMA [Against Medical Advice]), dated 10/26/22 showed: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not initiate transfer or discharge for the resident from the facility, except in limited circumstances. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 4.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for three of five residents (Resident (R) 2, R30, R32) reviewed for weights, out of a sample of 32 residents. This failure could create a scenario where significant weight loss or gain is not recognized as no baseline weight was established. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Monitoring, dated 05/2024, showed: Policy: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise. Compliance Guidelines: Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended loss over a period…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 (R48, R33, R36, R8) of 16 residents reviewed for quality of care received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. * Staff did not understand the 4/12/23 physician's order for R48 which documented may have 1 drink a day. One ounce liquor per drink. Maximum of three ounces within 2 hours in a 24 hour period. Hold liquor if [R48] appears to be intoxicated or impaired. As needed. Staff were not consistently following the order resulting in R48 receiving 3 times the amount ordered. * During wound care for R33, staff did not use soap for incontinence care prior to dressing change. * R36 was missing neurological checks for unwitnessed falls that occurred on 1/10/2023 and 3/10/2023. * R8 did not have RN assessments before being lifted off the ground and neurological checks completed for unwitnessed falls on: 1/12/2023, 2/13/2023, 2/23/2023, and 12/26/2023. Findings include: 1. R48 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide a bed hold notice upon transfer to the hospital as required for 1 (R1) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. *R1 was hospitalized on [DATE]. The facility did not provide a bed hold notice for R1's hospitalization on 4/3/23. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] On 7/13/23 at 9:35 AM, Surveyor asked SSC (Social Services Coordinator)-H if the facility had any evidence that a bed hold notice been provided to R1 and R1's representative on 4/3/23. SSC-H said she would look into this. On 7/13/23, at 3:05 PM, Surveyor conducted an interview with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A. NHA-A notified Surveyor there was no documentation in R1's record indicating R1 and R1's responsible party was provided with a bed hold notice. No further information was provided by the facility at this time.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries receives appropriate care, treatment, and preventative interventions to promote healing for 2 (R26 and R62) of 6 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. 1. R26 had a right gluteal pressure injury and is at high risk for pressure injuries. On 6/15/23 R26's sacral would reopened. Treatments were for the right gluteal fold, sacrum and a protective dressing was put in place for the right buttocks on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. On 7/10/23 Surveyor observed R26 with 3 bandages dated 7/6/23 which should have been changed Saturday 7/8/23. Documentation showed missed wound treatments on 7/8/23. On 7/10/23, the facility changed the order to Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. On 7/13/23 Surveyor again observed R26 with 3 bandages dated 7/11/23 (Tuesday) which should have been changed 7/12/23 (Wednesday). 2. R33 was observed with his air mattress on the incorrect settings. Findings include: Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not provide adequate nutritional support to 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Nutrition. * R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility did not accurately conduct a baseline weight upon admission for R62 in accordance with their policy and procedure. The facility did not provide nutritional supplement for R62 per dietician recommendations. Findings include: R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of malnutrition and cognitive communication deficit. Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention with a revision date of September 2008. The facility's policy reads: The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor and intervene for undesirable weight loss. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Weight Assessment 1. The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, the next day, and weekly for two weeks, thereafter. If no weight concerns are noted at this point,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure consistent communication for 1 (R20) of 1 Residents reviewed who receive dialysis services. R20 did not have communication forms between the Facility and Dialysis provider until April 1, 2023. On 7/10/23 R20 was observed waiting for pick up for dialysis. R20 had no communication paperwork to bring with her to the dialysis appointment. Additionally, the dialysis center is noted to not send communication paperwork back to the facility. There is inconsistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Hemodialysis, implemented on 2/15/2023, states: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis. Purpose:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure 1 (R33) of 5 residents observed during wound treatment had the necessary hand hygiene performed. On 7/12/23 at 8:14 a.m. Surveyor observed pressure injury treatment performed on R33. RN K had missed opportunity for hand hygiene during the observation. Findings include: R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of quadriplegia, schizophrenia, cerebral infarction and pulmonary hypertension. R33 has a healing Stage 4 pressure injury. On 7/12/23 at 8:14 a.m. Surveyor observed R33 receive treatment to the sacrum pressure injury. RN K proceeded to perform the wound treatment. During the wound treatment, RN K performed donning and doffing gloves along with hand hygiene prior to cleaning the wound, after cleaning the wound and prior to applying the prescribed santyl to the wound bed. After RN K completed the wound treatment, she kept the gloves on and proceed to place a clean brief on R33, placed a clean pillow under R33 calf, clean up the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burlington Health and Rehabilitation CenterBurlington, WI 1 of 5Lyonsview Health And Rehabilitation CenterKnoxville, TN 1 of 5Madison Health and Rehabilitation CenterMadison, WI 1 of 5Manahawkin Health And Rehabilitation CenterManahawkin, NJ 1 of 5Suring Health and Rehab CenterSuring, WI 1 of 5Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 2 of 5Avondale Health and Rehabilitation Center, LLCHumboldt, TN 2 of 5Beloit Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, WI 2 of 5Eastview Health and Rehabilitation CenterAntigo, WI 2 of 5Highlands Health And Rehabilitation CenterMemphis, TN 2 of 5Muskego Health and Rehabilitation CenterMuskego, WI 2 of 5North Ridge Health and Rehabilitation CenterManitowoc, WI 2 of 5Oconto Health and Rehab CenterOconto, WI 2 of 5Riverside Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCTrenton, NJ 3 of 5Monroe Health And Rehabilitation CenterMadisonville, TN 3 of 5Patriot Health and Rehabilitation CenterParis, TN 4 of 5Dyersburg Health And Rehabilitation CenterDyersburg, TN 4 of 5Nu Roc Health and Rehabilitation CTRLaona, WI 4 of 5Okeena Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCDyersburg, TN 4 of 5St Ann Health and Rehabilitation CenterMilwaukee, WINot rated (Special Focus)Medical Suites at Oak Creek (The)Oak Creek, WI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RUVEL, MENACHEMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 02/01/2018
WEINBERG, YISROELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 02/01/2018
THE BAY AT SHERIDAN HEALTH AND REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$865K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 8%Other / private 64%

This home reported $865K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,424per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$338per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525318. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next