North Ridge Health and Rehabilitation Center
1445 N 7th St, Manitowoc, WI 54220 · For profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (920) 682-0314 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,740 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-25)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.9% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.5% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.3% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 39.8% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.4% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.3% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 39.9% | 15.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 48.3% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.6% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.3% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.4%CMS range 32.0–67.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 7.6–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 56.3 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 1.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 1 resident reviewed for elopement. An elopement risk assessment, dated 1/31/25, indicated R2 was at risk for elopement. A WanderGuard (a security device that triggers an alarm if the wearer exits the facility) was placed on R2's left ankle. On 6/12/25 at 3:10 AM, R2 eloped from the facility and was found at approximately 3:55 AM approximately two miles from the facility. An investigation determined R2 exited the facility through the 200 wing door which had an alarm that sounded, however, staff were unable to hear the alarm because they were in residents' rooms providing care. Staff did not respond to the alarm until approximately 3:15 AM. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision for a resident assessed to be at risk for elopement created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 6/12/25. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A was notified of the immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was served under safe and sanitary conditions. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 56 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not use utensils while plating lunch items, including diced tomatoes, shredded lettuce, shredded cheese, soft shell tortillas, and bread. R14, R15, and R16's medical records indicated they were allergic to tomatoes. R14, R15, and R16 received potentially cross-contaminated lunch items on 4/14/26. Findings include: The 2022 Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code indicates: Epidemiological outbreak data repeatedly identify five major risk factors related to employee behaviors and preparation practices in retail and food service establishments as contributing to foodborne illness: Improper holding temperatures; Inadequate cooking, such as undercooking raw shell eggs; Contaminated equipment; Food from unsafe sources; and Poor personal hygiene 2-301.14 When to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food preferences were honored for 1 resident (R) (R9) of 4 sampled residents.R9's 4/14/26 lunch ticket listed R9's meal preferences. R9 was served two items R9 requested not to receive.Findings include: From 4/13/26 to 4/14/26, Surveyor reviewed R9's medical record. R9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure (CHF). R9's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/19/26, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R9's cognition was intact. R9 was R9's own decision maker.R9's medical record contained a diet order, dated 10/10/25, for limited concentrated sweets (LSC), regular texture, regular/thin consistency. On 4/14/26 at 11:48 PM, Surveyor observed [NAME] (CK)-C plate meals for residents. CK-C informed Surveyor that each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 42 of 53 residents residing in the facility. (Eleven residents received nutrition via tube feeding). Staff did not monitor wash or rinse temperatures for the low-temp chemical sanitizing mechanical warewashing machine.The mixer was not covered.Staff working in the kitchen did not consistently cover facial hair.Findings include:On 12/8/25 at 9:37 AM, Surveyor began an initial kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM)-I who indicated the facility followed the Wisconsin Food Code.The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 4-501.110 Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Wash Solution Temperature: (B) The temperature of the wash solution in spray-type warewashers that use chemicals to sanitize may not be less than 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F).On 12/10/25 at 1:15 PM, Surveyor observed [NAME] (CK)-L complete dishwashing. Surveyor observed 2 racks of dishes go through the facility's low-temp chemical sanitizing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R7) of 1 sampled resident with a Guardian was protectively placed in the facility. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a legal Guardian of person and estate beginning 9/11/20. The facility did not have protective placement determination for R7. Findings include: State Statute Chapter 55.055(10)(b) requires court-ordered protective placement for any resident admitted to a nursing home who has a legal Guardian and whose nursing home stay exceeds sixty days. Protective placement is reviewed annually (State Statute Chapter 55.18) to determine if placement continues to be the least restrictive and in the best interest of the individual.On 12/8/25, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including intellectual disability, bipolar disorder, and diabetes. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/17/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure freedom from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and not required to treat medical symptoms for 1 resident (R) (R49) of 1 sampled resident. The facility's Restraint Free Environment policy, revised 2/5/25, indicates: The resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of physical or chemical restraints for discipline or convenience and limits restraint use .a physical restraint refers to any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Physical restraints include .applying leg or arm restraints, hand mitts, soft ties, or vests that the resident cannot remove .physical restraints may be used in emergency care situations for brief periods to permit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R42) of 5 sampled residents met the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements.R42 had a negative PASRR Level I Screen upon admission. A Level II Screen was not completed when R42 received a qualifying diagnosis and was prescribed medication. Findings include:The Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) PASRR for current or prospective nursing home residents Level II Screen facesheet indicates: .nursing home should retain a copy of this facesheet and attached documentation in the person's current medical record. If the person's condition or diagnoses change so that he/she later may meet the federal definition of a developmental disability or a serious mental illness, the nursing home will need to submit an updated Level II Screen to the appropriate PASRR contract agency. This can be found at https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/pasrr/resources.htm.From 12/8/25 to 12/10/25, Surveyor reviewed R42's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a WanderGuard (a security device that triggers an alarm if the wearer exits the facility) was consistently checked for placement, function, and skin integrity underneath for 1 resident (R) (R42) of 1 sampled resident.R42's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) contained orders to check for WanderGuard placement, function, and skin integrity. The checks were not consistently completed.Findings include: The facility's Elopements and Wandering Residents policy, revised [DATE], indicates: .1. The facility is equipped with door locks/alarms to help avoid elopements .3. The facility shall establish and utilize a systematic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement or unsafe wandering, including identification and assessment of risk, evaluation and analysis of hazards and risks, implementing interventions to reduce hazards and risks, and monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary. 4 .e) Charge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure assessments, vital signs, and weights were consistently completed pre- and post-dialysis and communicated to the dialysis facility for 1 resident (R) (R9) of 1 sampled resident.Staff did not consistently obtain R9's pre- and post-dialysis vitals signs and weight or check R9's access port. In addition, staff did not consistently complete R9's dialysis communication sheets and Treatment Administration Record (TAR).Findings include:The facility's Hemodialysis policy, dated 12/22/24, indicates: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis .This will include: The ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of medication for 1 resident (R) (R31) of 19 sampled residents.Medications were left at R31's bedside for R31 to self-administer. R31 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment, a physician order, or a care plan that indicated R31 could safely and accurately self-administer medication.Findings include:The facility's Resident Self-Administration of Medication policy, dated 2/22/24, indicates: A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) has determined which medications may be self-administered safely .4. The results of the IDT assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form which is placed in the resident's medical record .14. The care plan must reflect resident self-administration and storage arrangements for such medicationsFrom 12/8/25 to 12/10/25, Surveyor reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 4 residents (R) (R1, R5, R4, and R3) of 9 sampled residents. In addition, the facility did not ensure narcotic medication was consistently reconciled. These practices had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 57 residents residing in the facility.R1, R5, R4, and R3's medications were not administered in accordance with the ordered administration time and facility policy.Nursing staff did not complete controlled substance counts at shift change.Findings include:The facility's undated Medication Administration policy indicates: .b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician.The facility's undated Liberalized Medication Administration policy indicates: Medication Administration Timeframes: .c) Twice daily, Three or More Times Daily: Administer within 30 minutes to 1 hour before or after scheduled time or as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) of 6 sampled residents received the appropriate care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from developing. R1 had a stage 3 presure injury on the coccyx upon admission. R1's wound care was not provided in accordance with a physician's order on 7/6/25. R1 developed a wound infection that required intravenous (IV) antibiotics and debridement.Findings include: The facility's Wound Treatment Management policy, revised 12/3/24, indicates: .1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change .On 8/6/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy due to carbon monoxide poisoning, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, tracheostomy, and pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 3. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 39 of the 54 residents residing in the facility. There were 15 residents who received nutrients exclusively via tube feeding. Staff did not wear hair restraints consistently throughout the kitchen. Kitchen equipment and food services areas were not in a clean and sanitary condition. Staff did not follow appropriate hand hygiene procedures when they prepared and served food. Resident food and beverages were not served at appropriate temperatures. Findings include: Hair Restraints: The 2022 Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code documents at 2-402.11 Hair Restraints: (A) Except as provided in (B) of this section, Food Employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens, and unwrapped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident representative was notified of a change in condition for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 13 sampled residents. R4 was diagnosed with yeast in the urine and had an order for antibiotic treatment. R4's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) was not notified of the change in condition or antibiotic treatment. In addition, R4 had low blood pressure readings on 5/10/25 and 5/11/25. R4's physician and POAHC were not notified. Findings include: The facility's Notification of Changes policy, revised 3/31/25, indicates: The purpose of this guideline is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Changes of condition require an evaluation .and ensures proper documentation and notification has been made .2. Significant change in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On [DATE], Surveyor reviewed R6's medical record. R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of glottis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status. A care plans, initiated on [DATE], indicated R6 had a Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infection (a highly contagious bacterium that causes diarrhea and colitis) and was on contact precautions. On [DATE] at 1:25 AM, Surveyor observed CNA-R and CNA-S enter R6's room without donning PPE. Surveyor observed a sign posted on R6's door that indicated R6 was on contact precautions. Surveyor observed CNA-R and CNA-S prepare to transfer R6 from bed to wheelchair. CNA-S applied R6's socks and shoes while CNA-R retrieved R6's wheelchair and a gait belt. CNA-R then applied the gait belt and assisted R6 to the wheelchair. CNA-R unhooked R6's trach hose, assisted R6 to a sitting position, then reapplied the hose. Registered Nurse (RN)-M then entered room without donning PPE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0551 — patternGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure guardianship and protective placement orders were obtained and advance directive wishes were followed for 4 Residents (R) (R31, R43, R39, and R30) of 17 sampled residents. R31 had a legal guardian at the time of admission on [DATE]. R31's medical record contained petitions for guardianship and protective placement, dated 9/28/22; however, R31's medical record did not contain guardianship or protective placement orders. R43 had a legal guardian at the time of admission on [DATE]. R43's medical record contained an Order and Notice of Hearing on Guardianship and Protective Placement, dated 3/23/24, with a hearing date of 5/6/24; however R43's medical record did not contain guardianship or protective placement orders. R39 had a legal guardian at the time of admission on [DATE]. R39's medical record contained petitions for guardianship and protective placement, dated 6/27/23; however, R39's medical record did not contain guardianship or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with the facility's policy. Three of 4 medication carts were observed unlocked and unattended. In addition, 2 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 2 mediation storage rooms contained expired medication and medical supplies. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents in the facility. Medication carts on the 500, 600, and 300 wings were unlocked and unattended on 8/12/24 and 8/13/24. Medication carts and the medication storage room on the 200 and 300 wings contained expired medications and medical supplies. Findings include: The facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 1/2024, indicates: Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturers' or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. The medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medication .4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 33 of 47 residents residing in the facility. (Fourteen residents received nutrition exclusively via tube feeding.) Kitchen equipment and food service areas were not kept in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent cross contamination. Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene and safe food handling practices when cooking and serving food. Staff did not document food holding temperatures. The resident refrigerator and reach-in cooler contained food and beverages that were past the discard date or not labeled with a discard date. Findings include: On 8/12/24 at 8:55 AM, Surveyor began an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM)-E who stated the facility followed the State and Federal Food Codes. Cleanliness: The 2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code documents at 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils: (A) Equipment food-contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection as observed during the provision of care for 7 Residents (R) (R36, R2, R9, R17, R11, R16, and R4) of 10 residents. On 8/12/24, staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during wound care for R36. On 8/12/24 and 8/13/24, staff did not wear masks or complete hand hygiene appropriately during the provision of care for R2. On 8/13/24, staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during a therapy session with R9 who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). On 8/13/24, staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene or wear required PPE during a transfer for R17 who was on EBP. On 8/12/24, staff did not complete proper hand hygiene while administering medication to R11, R16, and R4. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated October 2022, indicates: All staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 Residents (R) (R11, R16, and R41) of 3 sampled residents were assessed as able to safely and accurately self-administer medication. On 8/12/24, License Practical Nurse (LPN)-U left medication with R11 for R11 to self-administer after breakfast. R11 did not have a physician's order, self-administration of medication assessment, or care plan that indicated R11 could safely and accurately self-administer medication. On 8/12/24, LPN-U left medication at R16's bedside for R16 to self-administer. R16 did not have a physician's order, self-administration of medication assessment, or care plan that indicated R16 could safely and accurately self-administer medication. On 8/12/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-K prepared a nebulizer treatment for R41 to self-administer. R41 did not have a physician's order, self-administration of medication assessment, or care plan that indicated R41 could safely and accurately self-administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R9) of 9 sampled residents had a call light within reach. R9's plan of care contained an intervention to be sure R9's call light was within reach. During an observation on 8/12/24, R9's call light was not within reach. Findings include: The facility's undated Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy indicates: .4. Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured . From 8/12/24 to 8/14/24, Surveyor reviewed R9's medical record. R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/28/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated R9 had intact cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the medical record contained advance directives for 1 Resident (R) (R13) of 17 sampled residents. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's medical record did not contain advance directives, including a Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) document. Findings include: The facility's Resident's Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directive policy, dated on 8/9/24, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive .Advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated .1) On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 Residents (R) (R12, R23, and R31) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. R12 was transferred to the hospital on 7/23/24. R12's activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) did not receive a written transfer notice. R23 was transferred to the hospital on 1/11/24. R23 was not provided with a written transfer notice. R31 was transferred to the hospital on 9/12/23, 10/21/23, 3/8/24, and 4/20/24. R31's court-appointed guardian did not receive written transfer notices. Findings include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge policy, dated 10/26/22, indicates: .4. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and way they can understand. The notice will include all the following at the time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 Residents (R) (R12, R23, and R31) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization received written information of the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility. R12 was transferred to the hospital on 7/23/24. R12's activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) was not provided with a written notice of the bed hold policy. R23 was transferred to the hospital on 1/11/24. R23 was not provided with a written notice of the bed hold policy. R31 was transferred to the hospital on 9/12/23, 10/21/23, 3/8/24, and 4/20/24. R31's court-appointed guardian was not provided with written notices of the bed hold policy. Findings include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge policy. dated 10/26/22 indicates: .4. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and way they can understand. The notice will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R31) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure injuries received the necessary care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from developing. R31 had multiple healed pressure and deep tissue injuries and received wound care to prevent the injuries from re-opening. During observations on 8/12/24, R31's wound care orders and care plan interventions were not implemented as ordered. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention Guidelines, dated 2/14/23, indicate: To prevent the formation of avoidable pressure injuries and to promote healing of existing pressure injuries, it is the policy of this facility to implement evidence-based interventions for all residents who are assessed at risk or who have a pressure injury present .1. Individualized interventions will address specific factors identified in the resident's risk assessment, skin assessment, and any pressure injury assessment .8. Compliance with interventions will be documented in the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 Resident (R) (R38) of 1 resident reviewed for smoking. R38 was known by the facility to smoke cigarettes. The facility did not assess R38's ability to safely smoke on a quarterly basis in accordance with the facility's policy. Findings include: The facility's Smoking Safety policy, with a revision date of 5/13/24, indicates: .1. Residents who smoke tobacco products shall have a smoking assessment completed upon admission, quarterly, and as needed. During the entrance conference on 8/12/24 at 9:10 AM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A confirmed the facility had 3 residents who smoked. From 8/12/24 to 8/14/24, Surveyor reviewed R38's medical record. R38 was admitted to facility on 6/2/23 and had diagnoses including emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/17/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R38 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure vital signs and weights were consistently completed pre- and post-dialysis and communicated to the dialysis facility for 1 Resident (R) (R30) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. Staff did not consistently complete R30's dialysis communication sheets and did not consistently obtain R30's pre- and post-dialysis vital signs and weights. Findings include: The facility's Hemodialysis policy, dated 2/15/23, indicates: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis .The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This will include: The ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monthly medication reviews were completed or followed-up on for 2 Residents (R) (R36 and R39) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. R36 had a pharmacist recommendation from R36's October 2023 monthly medication review (MMR). The recommendation was not addressed until 2/5/24. In addition, R36 did not have an MMR documented for March of 2024. R39 had a pharmacist recommendation from R39's November 2023 MMR. The recommendation was not addressed at the time of the annual survey. Findings include: The facility's Medication Regimen Review and Reporting policy, dated 2007, indicates: The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen and medical chart of each resident at least monthly to appropriately monitor the medication regimen and ensure the medications each resident receives are clinically indicated .Medication Regimen Review recommendations and findings are documented and acted upon by the nursing center within 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure it served pasta salad at a safe and appetizing temperature. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility, excluding 19 of 50 residents who received nutrition via enteral feeding. On 7/9/24, the temperature of cold pasta salad was 61.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Findings include: The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 3-501.16 Potentially Hazardous Food (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food), Hot and Cold Holding: (A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control as specified under § 3-501.19, and except as specified under (B) and in (C) of this section, Potentially Hazardous Food (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food) shall be maintained: (1) At 57°C (Celsius)(135°F) or above, except that roasts cooked to a temperature and for a time specified in 3-401.11 (B) or reheated as specified in 3-403.11 (E) may be held at a temperature of 54°C (130°F) or above; or (2) At 5°C (41°F) or less. (B) Eggs that have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility, excluding 19 of 50 residents who received nutrition via enteral feeding. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene prior to donning/doffing gloves, while preparing food, prior to touching ready to eat food, and while throwing away garbage. Findings include: On 7/9/24 at 11:19 AM, Surveyor began an initial kitchen tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM)-F who stated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. The Wisconsin Food Code documents at Chapter 2 Personal Cleanliness at 2-301.14 When to Wash: Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms as specified under 2-301.12 immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: (A) After touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure appropriate care and treatment were provided when 1 resident (R) (R1) of 12 sampled residents experienced a change of condition. On 5/5/24, R1 experienced a change of condition. Staff did not document complete and accurate assessments regarding R1's change of condition or notify R1's physician in a timely manner. Findings include: The facility's Notification of Changes policy, dated 10/22/22, indicates: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification .Need to alter treatment significantly means a need to stop a form of treatment because of adverse consequences (such as adverse drug reaction) or commence a new form of treatment to deal with a problem (for example, the use of any medical procedure, or therapy that has not been used on that resident before)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R10 and R11) of 4 residents with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a medical procedure in which a tube is passed into the stomach through the abdominal wall) received treatment and services to prevent adverse consequences of enteral feeding. Staff did not obtain weights for R10 and R11 in accordance with physicians' orders. Findings include: The facility's Weight Monitoring Policy, dated 11/1/23, indicates: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise .Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure menu items were prepared according to the recipe and served according to the extended menu for 1 resident (R) (R13) of 1 resident who was on a pureed diet. During lunch service on 7/9/24, staff did not follow the pureed food recipe and did not use an appropriate serving size to serve pureed chicken. Findings include: The facility's Food Preparations Guidelines policy, with an implementation date of 10/24/22, indicates: 1. The cook, or designee, shall prepare menu items following the facility's written menus and standardized recipes. 2. Food shall be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. This includes .b. Preparing foods as directed. On 7/9/24, Surveyor reviewed R13's medical record. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R13 had an order for a pureed diet. In addition, R13 received nutrition via tube feeding. On 7/9/24 at 11:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure it served milk at a safe and appetizing temperature. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility, excluding 19 of 52 residents who received nutrition via enteral feeding. On 5/20/24, the temperature of milk served on a test tray was 53.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Findings include: The facility's Food Preparation Guidelines policy, dated 10/24/22, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to prepare food in a manner to preserve or enhance a resident's nutrition and hydration status .3. Food and drinks shall be palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Strategies to ensure resident satisfaction include: .c. Serving hot food/drinks hot and cold food/drinks cold . The facility's undated Food Temperature log indicates: .Temperatures must be taken on a daily basis .Cold food 41 (degrees) F and below . On 5/20/24 at 11:36 AM, Surveyor observed kitchen staff prepare room trays for the lunch meal. Surveyor observed [NAME] (CK)-C obtain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during food preparation. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility, excluding 19 of 52 residents who received nutrition via enteral feeding. On 5/20/24, [NAME] (CK)-C did not consistently perform appropriate hand hygiene during food preparation. Findings include: The facility provided a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled Food Worker Handwashing and Food Preparation, dated September 2011, that indicated: The spread of germs from the hands of food workers to food is an important cause of foodborne illness outbreaks .Proper handwashing can reduce germs on workers' hands. It can also reduce the spread of germs from hands to food and from food to other people. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advises that hands be washed before making food .The FDA also advises that hands be washed after handling dirty equipment . On 5/20/24 at 10:47 AM, Surveyor observed CK-C prepare coffee cake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care and treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 2 sampled residents. R2 was not monitored after a change in condition which resulted in a hospitalization for septic shock. Findings include: R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, persistent vegetative state, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, tracheostomy and gastrostomy status. R2 had an activated Guardian. On 11/8/23, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. A nursing assessment, dated 10/10/23, indicated R2 had bilateral increased upper extremity edema (swelling). On 10/11/23, R2 was evaluated by Nurse Practitioner (NP)-D who initiated a plan to monitor R2's edema and weight. R2's medical record did not indicate R2's edema or weight was monitored between 10/11/23 and 10/16/23. On 10/16/23, R2's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a grievance was filed, investigated and resolved for 1 Resident (R4) of 7 residents reviewed. R4 informed Director of Nursing (DON)-B of a care concern. A grievance form was not filled out and the grievance was not thoroughly investigated or resolved. Findings include: The facility's Grievances/Complaints Filing from 2001 Med-Pass, Inc (Revised April 2017) document indicated: .1. Any resident .may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members .Grievances may also be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. 3. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response. 8. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-14 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who was a certified dietary or food service manager, who had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body, or who had an associate level or higher degree in food service management or hospitality. This had the potential to affect 44 out of 57 residents who resided in the facility. (Thirteen residents were exclusively tube fed.) Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 6/12/23 at 8:15 AM, Dietary Manager (DM)-L stated DM-L did not know what standard of practice the facility followed for food safety. DM-L stated DM-L was hired several years ago as a cook and was promoted to the Dietary Manager role approximately two years ago. DM-L stated during the time DM-L worked as the Dietary Manager, DM-L took a leave of absence for six months and returned to the role in approximately February 2023. Surveyor reviewed documentation provided by the facility and noted DM-L was hired as a cook…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 44 of 57 residents residing in the facility. (Thirteen residents received nutrition exclusively via tube feeding.) Staff did not test Quaternary sanitizing solution per manufacturer's instructions. Cook (CK)-N did not wait two minutes to take microwave reheated food temperature to ensure food was heated evenly. Staff did not ensure food-contact and non-food contact equipment, including a can opener, stove griddle, oven, and double oven were clean and dry for storage or use. The facility did not monitor and document hot holding temperatures. The facility did not cool foods with an approved food cooling method. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 6/13/23, Dietary Manager (DM)-L stated DM-L was unsure which standard of practice the facility followed for food safety. On 6/13/23 at 2:45 PM, Surveyor interviewed Registered Dietician (RD)-H who was also unsure which standard of practice the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) services for 4 Residents (R) (R30, R53, R44 and R50) of 5 sampled residents. The facility did not accurately complete PASRR Level I Screens and/or submit PASRR Level II Screens for R30, R53, R44, and R50. Findings include: The facility's Resident Assessment: Coordination with PASRR Program policy, dated 5/8/23, contained the following information: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) program under Medicaid to ensure individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs .ii. Positive Level I Screen necessitates a PASRR Level II evaluation prior to admission .2. The facility will only admit individuals with a mental disorder or intellectual disability who the State mental health or intellectual disability authority has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure menu serving sizes for pureed and mechanically altered diets were followed for 8 Residents (R) (R58, R20, R10, R43, R8, R4, R3, and R41) of 44 residents. The facility served smaller serving portions than the menu indicated for pureed green beans, pureed polish sausage on a bun and mechanically altered polish sausage during the lunch meal on 6/13/23. Findings include: The facility's extended menu documented the lunch meal serving size as 6 ounces (oz) (black handle food scoop) for regular portions of pureed green beans and pureed polish sausage on a bun. The menu also contained a serving size of 1 polish sausage and 1 bun for mechanically altered meat. Lunch menu for 6/12/23: Polish sausage Corn Potato salad Cookie BBQ (barbecue) pork on a bun (alternative) During a continuous lunch preparation and meal service observation on 6/12/23 beginning at 11:20 AM, Surveyor noted [NAME] (CK)-N did not reference an extended menu while placing scoops in food on the steam table. Surveyor observed CK-N pour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a complete baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for 1 Resident (R) (R35) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for new admission. R35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea (windpipe) to allow air to fill the lungs), gastrostomy (an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support) and ventilator (a machine used medically to support or replace the breathing of a person) dependence. R35's baseline care plan did not address the diagnoses. Findings include: From 6/12/23 through 6/14/23, Surveyor reviewed R35's medical record. R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include persistent vegetative state, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, dependence on ventilator status, and diabetes. R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/24/23, indicated R35 received nutrition through a feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R50 and R58) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were provided weekly showers. R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had four documented showers since 4/1/23. R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had one documented shower since 5/1/23. Findings include: 1. R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/23/23, indicated R50 had severe cognitive impairment and required the assistance of one staff for bathing. On 6/12/23 at 10:14 AM, Surveyor observed R50 in R50's room. Surveyor noted R50's hair was unkept and appeared greasy. Between 6/12/23 and 6/14/23, Surveyor reviewed R50's medical record and noted R50 received showers on 4/30/23, 5/6/23, 5/16/23, and 6/6/23 and refused showers on 4/18/23, and 4/29/23. R50's weekly shower was scheduled on the Tuesday AM shift. R50 had seven missed opportunities for showers. 2. R58 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not obtain weights as part of nutritional monitoring for 2 Residents (R) (R58 and R35) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. R58 did not have an order on admission for weight monitoring. The facility's policy stated to obtain weights weekly for four weeks and monitor residents with weight loss weekly. R35 had an order for weekly weights and a tube feeding (TF) rate of 60 ml/hr (milliliters/hour). The facility did not consistently monitor R35's weight on a weekly basis or ensure the TF rate was followed per physician order. Findings include: The facility's undated Weight Monitoring policy contained the following information: a. A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents; b. Newly admitted residents - Monitor weight weekly for 4 weeks; c. Residents with weight loss - monitor weight weekly. 1. From 6/12/23 through 6/14/23, Surveyor reviewed R58's medical record. R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure high-risk medications were monitored for 2 Residents (R) (R33 and R44) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R33 and R44's medical records did not contain documentation that R33 and R44 were monitored for potential side effects of diuretic medication. Findings include: According to the Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses 18th edition copyright 2023, adverse reactions/side effects of diuretic medication such as thirst, dry mouth, lethargy, weakness, hypotension, or oliguria may occur .Monitor daily weight, intake and output ratios, amount and location of edema, lung sounds, skin turgor, and mucous membranes .Monitor blood pressure and pulse before and during administration. 1. On 6/6/23, Surveyor reviewed R33's medical record and noted an order for Lasix (a diuretic (water pill) that prevents the body from absorbing too much salt) 20 mg daily related to essential (primary) hypertension. R33's plan of care did not contain medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure potential side effects and adverse reactions for a psychotropic medication were monitored for 1 Resident (R) (R44) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R44 was prescribed lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication). The facility did not include monitoring for side effects or adverse reactions to the medication in R44's plan of care. Findings include: On 6/14/23, Surveyor reviewed R44's medical record. R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety and depression. R44 had an order for lorazepam tablet 1 milligram, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for anxiety. R44's plan of care did not contain monitoring for potential side effects or adverse reactions to lorazepam. On 6/14/23 at 12:31 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B who verified R44's plan of care did not contain monitoring for side effects or adverse reactions to lorazepam. DON-B stated side effect and adverse reaction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents (R) on a pureed diet had meals prepared by a method that conserved nutritive value for 2 (R20 and R58) of 2 residents with pureed diets. Kitchen staff used water to puree multiple food items which did not conserve the nutritive value of the food. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour that began at 8:12 AM on 6/13/23, Dietary Manager (DM)-L stated R20 and R58 had orders for a pureed diet. The facility's Menu Matrix, dated 9/19/18, contained the recipe for pureed cooked green beans .liquids should be added gradually and may need to be increased or decreased slightly to ensure foods are served at a proper consistency. Other fluids deemed more appropriate may be substituted to improve the taste quality of the food without impacting the overall nutritional quality of the meal .Note: cooking liquid, broth or other suitable liquid may be used when pureeing this food. According to the publication All About Recipes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 6/12/23 at 11:24 AM, Surveyor observed CNA-K and CNA-E provide perineal care for R17. CNA-K and CNA-E cleansed hands and donned the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). CNA-K opened the tabs of R17's soiled brief and tucked the front end of the brief underneath R17's buttocks. CNA-K provided perineal care with a wet, soapy washcloth. With the same gloved hands, CNA-K dried R17's perineal area with a towel. CNA-K then removed and disposed of R17's soiled brief. With the same gloved hands, CNA-K touched furniture, cream, powder and a clean brief. CNA-K then removed gloves. Without cleansing hands, CNA-K donned clean gloves, placed a clean brief under R17's buttocks and applied cream to R17's buttocks. CNA-K then removed gloves. Without cleansing hands, CNA-K donned clean gloves and closed the tabs on R17's brief. CNA-K put a clean gown on R17 and both CNAs positioned R17 in bed. After removing gloves and PPE, CNA-K did not perform hand hygiene prior to exiting the room and touching the door knob.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-08-14 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate submission of mandatory staffing information based on payroll data in a uniformed electronic format to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. Staffing data for fiscal quarter 1 (date range: 10/1/23-12/31/23) and quarter 2 (date range: 1/1/24-3/31/24) of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) were not submitted accurately to CMS. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-Term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, indicates: Chapter 1: .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS 1.2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,740 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,740 — penalty dated 2025-06-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAMPION CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 02/03/2018 |
| RUVEL, MENACHEM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| WEINBERG, YISROEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $947K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525389. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.