No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverside Health And Rehabilitation Center LLC

325 Jersey Street, Trenton, NJ 08611 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 141 certified beds · (609) 394-3400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (609) 394-3400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Mar 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
515 S Broad St · (609) 392-6950 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1201 S Broad St · (609) 394-8111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
859 Beatty St · (609) 571-1881 · Call to confirm hours
Park
953 Lamberton St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.5%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.3%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.8%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.9%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table46.1%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication12.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.9%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.0%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.502.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days6.241.111.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.4%CMS range 26.6–52.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.1–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.4–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
34.7%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 122.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-21)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 04/15/2026 from 9:27AM to 10:41AM, the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD):In the Stand Up/Cold Prep refrigerator, a partially empty jar of applesauce observed with no opened date or use by date. The FSD acknowledged it should be dated. On the floor beside the ice machine, debris was observed on the floor. In the dry storage room, the surveyor observed two boxes containing single-serve cereal bowls stacked directly on the floor. The FSD acknowledged the boxes should not be on the floor and relocated the boxes to the shelf unit. In the dry storage room, three boxes containing single-serve cereal bowls were not labeled with a received by date. The FSD acknowledged the received by date was missing from the boxes.In the dry storage room, an opened box of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the residents' living environment in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner for 2 of 4 units (Second and Fourth Floor). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour on 04/15/2026 at 9:30 AM, surveyor #1 observed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER]: A chair in the bathroom had a brown stain on the seat. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The bathroom wall had large scuff marks that penetrated through the drywall. room [ROOM NUMBER]: A foul odor was present, and the unmade bed had stained sheets and pillowcases. 3rd Floor Shower Room: A patch in the tiled wall had not been retiled. Additionally, the floor molding was peeling off and was held in place with tattered blue tape, which was also peeling. During follow-up rounds on 04/20/2026 at 10:50 AM, surveyor # 1 observed: room [ROOM NUMBER]: A foul odor remained, and the bed was made with visible stains on the top blanket. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The same chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to accurately account for the administration, disposition, and reconciliation of 3 controlled medications for 3 sampled resident (Resident #47, Resident #58 and Resident #69) identified upon inspection of 2 of 3 medication carts (second floor low-side cart and high-side cart). The evidence was as follows: On 4/15/2026 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) inspected the second-floor high end medication cart. A review of the narcotics located in the secured and locked narcotic box revealed Resident 58's Chain-of-Custody Record (a declining inventory record) for methadone 100 mg (milligram) oral solution, a medication used to treat opioid use disorder, did not match. The bag contained 7 bottles, six contained medication and one was empty. The Chain-of-custody Record had not been completed to indicate any doses had been administered. A further review of the narcotic box revealed Resident #69's buprenorphine/naloxone 8/2 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055, to 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 56) reviewed under Beneficiaries Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 56's Electronic Medical Record revealed the resident was admitted with Medicare A as the primary payer source. A review of the Beneficiary Notification Review completed by the facility revealed that Resident # 56's Medicare Part A skilled services episode start date was 09/04/2025. The last covered day of Part A service was 12/1/2025. A review of the Beneficiary Notification Review revealed that the SNF ABN, Form CMS 10055 was not provided to the resident. No explanation was provided on the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form. On 04/20/2026 at 10:43 AM during an interview with the surveyor, the facility's Business Manager said that the Social Worker at the time, did not know they had to issue a SNF ABN form. She said that originally yes was checked on the SNF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care consistent with the resident's care plan by failing to order and implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for Tube Feeding. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 04/15/2026 at 12:12 PM during initial tour, Resident #3 was observed lying in their bed attached to an enteral feed pump (a device used to deliver liquid nutrition directly into a person's stomach or small intestine through a tube). At that time, the surveyor observed no EBP signage outside the resident's doorway. At the same time the surveyor observed Resident #3s identification sign at the top of the doorway with no colored mark next to his/her name. On 4/16/2026 at 1:27 PM the surveyor observed no EBP signage outside of the room of Resident #3. No evidence was observed to indicate Resident #3 was on EBP. On 4/17/2026 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor observed and EBP sign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management that met professional standards of practice related to pain management. Specifically, by giving pain medication outside of the window of administration. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 106) investigated for pain. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/15/2026 9:43 AM the surveyor spoke to Resident #106 who stated that they received pain medication late. A review of Resident #106's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 03/20/26 reflected that they received routine pain medication. A review of Resident #106's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of but not limited to muscle weakness and a lack of coordination. A review of Resident #106's physician's orders located in the EMR revealed an order for Acetaminophen Extra Strength Tablet 500 MG (milligrams) 2 tablets to be given by mouth twice a day for arthritis pain, and tramadol 50 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice to preserve their integrity. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 2 medication storage areas (first floor nursing office) inspected and was evidenced by the following: On 4/20/2026 at 12:29 PM, the surveyor in the presence of the Director of Nursing (DON), inspected the first-floor medication storage room. There was no medication refrigerator located in that room, the DON stated there was a refrigerator used to store medications located in the first-floor nursing office. On 4/20/2026 at 12:35 PM, the surveyor in the presence of the DON, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Infection Preventionist (IP) inspected the refrigerator in the first-floor nursing office. During inspection of the medication room refrigerator the surveyor observed an open, undated multi-use vial of Tuberculin Purified protein derivative (PPD) 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure standardized recipes were utilized to ensure food was prepared to conserve nutritive value and flavor. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 observed lunch meals prepared and the evidence was as follows:On 04/16/2026 at 11:50 AM, Resident #9 stated that they were unsatisfied with the food they were served. Resident #9 stated that they did not receive the food listed on their ticket and the portions were small.On 04/17/2026 at 11:10 AM during the resident council meeting, 5 out of 5 members in attendance stated that the food was not appealing and was not palatable. On 4/16/2026 at 12:02 PM during an interview, the Food Service Director (FSD) stated the menu is a set daily menu with a main entree and alternate entree. The FSD further stated that the computer system generates the resident's meal ticket based on their diet order. The FSD stated that any changes or any alternate are requested by the resident's nurse. The surveyor reviewed the week 3, Week at a Glance menu…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices were followed to prevent the potential spread of infection for a resident on contact isolation. This deficient practice was evidenced for 1 of 10 residents (Resident # 65) reviewed under the Infection Control Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 65's EMR revealed under orders that he/she has an E.Coli/UTI (a bacterial infection in the urinary tract). The order clarifies that the precaution type is contact. The order was started on 4/16/2026.A review of Resident # 65's Care Plan located in the EMR revealed the resident was on isolation contact precautions.A review of Resident # 65's Care Plan located in the EMR revealed Resident # 65 had Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (a type of staph that can be resistant to several antibiotics). The Care Plan was last reviewed 02/06/2026.A review of Resident # 65's Care Plan revealed an intervention for but not limited to, Contact isolation wear gowns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of pests. The deficient practice was identified by observation of a live pest on 1 of 4 floors (2nd Floor) in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/16/2026 at 10:40 AM while touring the 2nd floor in the hallway near the nurses station, the surveyor observed a brown insect crawling across the wall near the hand rail. At that time, the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) also observed the insect when the surveyor brought it to his attention. He then used a disposable glove to dispose of the insect. The LPN/UM informed the surveyor that he will document the occurrence in the Pest Control Log. On 04/20/2026 at 12:55 PM during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) said that pest control services are scheduled biweekly. Further, he said they have had the company come in to make a more in-depth treatment. When the surveyor asked if there is an ongoing issue with insects, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT#: NJ0018543 Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility on 3/21/25 and 3/25/25, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy to ensure that existing staff received annual education for 1 of 2 employee files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the Social Worker Assistant's (SWA) employee file, which included a General Orientation Checklist for All Employees dated 12/15/09. The checklist indicated that the SWA had an in-service on Resident Neglect and Abuse as part of her orientation. The employee file did not contain any additional in-services regarding this topic. On 3/21/25 at 1:02 P.M., during an interview with the SWA, she stated that although she could not recall the exact date she received an in-service on Abuse and Neglect (A/N), she knew it had been over a year. On 3/21/25, at 3:18 P.M., during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated that all staff were to be in-service on A/N upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT#: NJ00184543 Based on interview, medical record review, and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility on 3/21/25 and 3/25/25, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) immediately initiate an investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse, and b.) implement the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following: Resident #2 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: paraplegia, acute pyelonephritis (a bacterial infection causing inflammation of the kidneys), anxiety, and depression. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 1/23/25, indicated that Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/18/2024 from 9:25 AM to 10:14 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Dietary Director (DD), and observed the following: 1.) In the refrigerator referred to as the reach in cooler, there were two egg salad sandwiches labeled with a use by date of 11/16/2024, but no made on date. The DD said that egg salad sandwiches should be discarded because sandwiches can cause illness. 2.) In the dry storage area, there were four bags of unopened marshmallows with a manufacture's expiration date of 07/2024. The DD said that marshmallows should be discarded because of the expiration date. 3.) In the overstock storage area, there were 70 cases (6 gallon per case) of water with a manufacture's expiration date of 07/31/2024. The DD said that the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) is aware of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews on 11/20/2024 and 11/21/2024 in the presence of the Director of Maintenance (DOM), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident call bell system properly functioned by a.) ensuring the call bell system volume was set to a level to be heard and b.) devices used to identify call bell notifications were functioning properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and was evidenced by the following: An observation at on 12/20/2024 at 12:55 PM revealed the call bell light outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] turned on when tested by the DOM, but there was no audible notification and the activation did not register at the nurse's station call bell annunciator. An observation at 1:00 PM revealed the call bell light outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] turned on when tested by the DOM, but there was no audible notification and the activation did not register at the nurse's station call bell annunciator. Additionally, visual notification of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 11/18/2024 at 10:34 AM during the initial tour on the second floor in the low side shower room, Surveyor # 3 observed a trash can without a bag liner. The surveyor observed disposable gloves discarded in the whirlpool tub. The sharps bin on the wall was full and not emptied. The plastic lid indicated, Full. On 11/20/2024 at 10:09 AM in the second floor shower room, Surveyor # 3 observed the sharps bin still indicating, full. On 11/20/2024 at 10:10 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], Surveyor # 3 observed the plastic on the foot board of Resident # 229's bed separated. Resident # 229 was asleep in the bed at that time. On 11/20/2024 at 10:13 AM, Surveyor # 3 observed the high side medication cart on the second floor. At that time, Surveyor # 3 observed hair tangled in the wheels of the cart. Surveyor # 3 observed residual stains and wrappers in the attached disposable glove holder on the side of the cart. On the same date at 10:15 AM, Surveyor # 3 observed the low side medication cart on the second floor. At that time,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control practices specifically by 1). failing to wear a gown when providing wound care, and 2). Performing hand hygiene for residents and staff during meal service. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 (Resident # 22) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury, and 1 of 3 floors observed for dining. (4th Floor) The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) A review of Resident # 22's diagnoses located in the Electronical Medical Record (EMR), revealed a diagnosis of but not limited to a pressure ulcer of the sacral region. A review of Resident # 27's physician's orders located in the EMR revealed that he/she was receiving Collagen (a dressing that maintains a moist wound environment that fosters healing) applied every day shift for pressure ulcer. The order further revealed to cleanse sacrum with normal saline solution, apply collagen and cover with a bordered gauze dressing. On 11/22/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment that protected and valued a residents' private space along with their personal property. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 28 residents reviewed for Resident Rights (Resident #77). During initial tour of the Fourth Floor on 11/18/2024 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor observed a housekeeper wiping the inside of Resident #77's bedside drawer that was located across from the resident's bed. The surveyor immediately requested the assistance of the Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN/UM#1) and upon the return to the resident's room, the surveyor and RN/UM#1 heard Resident #77 yell to the housekeeper to get out of the drawer and that they didn't give permission to go in there. The surveyor inquired if housekeeping has permission to go inside of resident's personal drawers. RN/UM #1 responded that they can open resident's drawers if the room was set to be carbolized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach for 1 of 28 sampled residents, (Resident #90). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/18/2024 at 10:49 AM, upon initial tour of the Fourth Floor, the surveyor observed Resident #90's call bell on the floor under the bed. When asked about their call bell, Resident #90 was unsure where it was and if they had one. On 11/19/2024 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor observed the call bell on the floor underneath the resident's bed. On 11/20/2024 at 12:26 PM, the surveyor observed the call bell on the floor underneath the resident's bed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #90. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: delusional disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological disorder and Diabetes Mellitus. A review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation and ensure that a complete and thorough investigation was conducted for residents that had a witnessed fall. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #8) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: On 11/19/2024 at 12:PM, the surveyor requested all accidents and/or investigations during the timeframe of 10/14/2024 to 11/17/20204. The facility provided information related to Resident #8 sustaining a fall without injury on 11/9/2024. Upon review of the fall investigation titled, Witnessed Fall with Head Injury dated 11/9/2024 at 2:19 PM revealed under Incident Description: Heard a noise from the hall and got up to check and saw resident sitting on the floor. There was an aide sitting in the hallway and witness resident falling. Per aide resident's shoe came off while walking and she saw resident going on the floor and the back of [their] head hit the wall. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #8. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 172764 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess the status of a resident in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate care. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 31 residents (Residents #98 and #41) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: 1.On 11/21/2024 at11:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #98 with a Wander guard to his/her left ankle. According to the admission Record, Resident #98 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia and cerebral vascular accident (stroke). Resident #98 had a Physician Order (PO) dated 04/10/24 to apply a Wander guard to the left ankle. A review of the April 2024, June 2024, and September 2024 Medication Administration Record reflected that the Wander guard was signed out as completed. A review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident # 98 reflected under Section P0200 that the resident was coded as 0 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs specifically by failing to include what the Care Plan focuses are related to. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident # 124 & 21) reviewed for Development/Implementation of Care Plans. A review of Resident # 124's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that he/she had a diagnoses including but not limited to Major Depression Disorder and Anxiety. A review of Resident # 124's Order Summary Report located in the EMR revealed that he/she had physician's orders including but not limited to bupropion (medication used to treat major depressive disorder), seroquel (medication used to treat bipolar disorder), and trazodone (medication used for depression). A review of Resident # 124's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain thorough documentation following a witnessed fall according to professional standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #8) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey state: The practice of nursing as a licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with indwelling urinary catheters received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible specifically by leaving the urinary catheter drainage bag in contact with the floor, unsecured to a bed, resting on top of a mattress while a resident was lying in bed, and failing to document whether the urinary catheter output was collected as ordered by the physician. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident # 120 & 21). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) A review of Resident # 120's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a physician's order to maintain a 16 french/10 cubic centimeter catheter to OSD bag secondary to urinary retention related to neurogenic bladder. The EMR further revealed a physician's order to document catheter output every shift, every 8 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment, specifically a nebulizer, in accordance with professional standards of practice by leaving it unsecured, open to air. The deficient practiced was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident # 72 & 19) investigated under Respiratory Care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 72's Order Summary located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an order for, Oxygen Tubing Change: Please change oxygen tubing and Nebulizer mask weekly for infection prevention and patency. Label and date. On 11/19/2024 at 11:18 AM while in Resident # 72's room, the surveyor observed a nebulizer mask (mask used to deliver aerosolized medication to assist with breathing) in an opened drawer not secured in a bag and exposed to air. On 11/20/2024 at 10:03 AM while in Resident # 72's room, the surveyor observed the nebulizer tubing extending into a close drawer. No date was observed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to address the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 81). reviewed for medication management. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record for Resident # 81 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out daily tasks), and Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (a nutritional status in which poor intake of nutrients lead to changes in body composition and function). The facility-provided CP Recommendation dated 05/22/2024, indicated to clarify the Resident # 81's liquid Colace (medication used to soften stool) order to include concentration milligram/milliliter (mg/ml), dose (mg), and volume (10ml). The order needing clarifaction was written,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to store, label, and date potentially hazardous food and maintain kitchen sanitation in a manner intended to limit the spread of food-borne illnesses. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/28/23 at 09:55 AM, the surveyor entered the kitchen and toured with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The surveyor observed several items throughout the kitchen that were not labeled properly to include a full case of bacon, several loaves of bread, boxes of tea bags, crackers in a yellow box, a bag of chips, and a metal container of grape jelly that was unlabeled. The jelly container contained peanut butter inside the jelly. The meat slicer was stored on the counter uncovered. The CDM made the observations alongside of the surveyor and confirmed the items should have been labeled,that separate spoons should have been used for the jelly and the peanut butter, and after the meat slicer was cleaned, it should have been covered. On the same day at 09:55 AM, the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint number: NJ00158868, NJ00159302, and NJ00158245 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for the residents. This deficient practice was identified on the a.third and b.fourth floor of the facility and was evidenced by the following: a. On 08/29/23 12:09 PM, the surveyor toured the third-floor unit, the high and low side. During the tour the surveyor observed the following: In rooms 303, 304, 309, and 315 the surveyor observed cracks in the glass windows. The cracks were covered with silver tape; they were semi-private rooms. room [ROOM NUMBER] had brown substance spots on the floor which appeared dry. room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a nightstand with a broken door handing from the hinge. room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a four-drawer dresser and one of the drawers was missing from the dresser. On 08/31/23 at 11:58 AM, the surveyor went into the third-floor shower room and observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice by incorrectly transcribing a physician's order for the appropriate dose of insulin medication. This deficient practice was identified for 9 out of 10 administered insulin doses for Unsampled Resident #1 observed during medication administration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey state: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well-being, and executing a medical regimen as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and pertinent record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) ensure the accountability of the Narcotic Shift Count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy and 2.) accurately account for and document the administration of controlled medications. This deficient practice was identified on 3 of 3 medication carts and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/1/23 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1) and a second surveyor, reviewed the narcotic logbook for the fourth floor's low side medication cart. The Record of Narcotic Count shift log revealed the following incomplete or blank sections: 8/1/23 - 7 AM incoming nurse and outgoing nurse signature and total number of narcotics remaining - cards, bottles, gels, and patches. 8/1/23 - 3 PM outgoing nurse signature and total number of narcotics remaining - cards, bottles, gels, and patches. 8/2/23 - 7 AM outgoing nurse signature 8/3/23 - 7 AM total number of narcotics remaining - patches. 8/26/23 - 11 PM total number of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) properly store medications including controlled substances, 2.) maintain clean and sanitary medication storage areas, and 3.) properly label opened multidose medications. This deficient practice was observed in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms and 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 10:06 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager #1 (LPN/UM #1) and a second surveyor, observed the fourth-floor medication storage room. The following observations were made: The medication storage refrigerator had a locking mechanism on the door which was left unlocked allowing the refrigerator door to be opened. In the refrigerator was a narcotic lock box which was secured to the inside of the refrigerator with a chain, had an unlocked hasp and padlock on the lid. Without the use of a key,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to promote dignity. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #287) reviewed for dignity. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/09/22 at 7:18 AM, admission records revealed that Resident #287's family member had concerns about Resident #287's Texas catheter (a urine collection device that fits like a condom over the penis) was removed without his/her permission and Resident #287 was placed in a diaper the first night at the facility. On 09/11/23 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #287's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the admission record for Resident #287 revealed a progress note dated for 8/10/22 which stated, Patient also noted with texas catheter from ER, f/u to be done with MD for order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices to have personal needs allowance (PNA) and to have use of the laundry room during the evening hours and on the weekends. This deficient practice was identified for 6 of 6 residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/31/23 at 10:30 AM, the resident council meeting was held and 6 out of 6 residents stated there was no PNA available in the evenings during the week and not available at all on the weekends, and the resident laundry room on the first floor was not available in the evenings during the week or on the weekends. On 08/31/23 at 02:09 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Administrator (Admin) and the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the PNA and the Admin's response to the PNA was that PNA is available on the weekends and in the evenings. He stated that a locked box is kept at the front desk for the residents to be able to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated, standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #51 ) reviewed for timing of assessments and was evidenced by the following: The Centers For Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual indicates that at a minimum, facilities are required to complete a comprehensive assessment for each resident not less than once every 12 months while a resident, where 12 months refers to a period within 366 days. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/29/23 a review of the electronic health record (EHR) reflects that resident #51 was admitted to the facility in July 2017. The MDS schedule revealed the most recent MDS assessments completed were: Annual MDS 7/15/22 Quarterly MDS 10/14/22 Quarterly MDS 1/14/23 Quarterly MDS 4/13/23 The annual MDS due 7/13/23 for Resident # 51 was not completed nor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) for a hospice resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #93) reviewed for hospice and was evidenced by the following: The Centers For Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual indicates that a SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The assessment reference date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same or later than the date of the hospice election statement, but not earlier than). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/29/23 at 11:25 AM, during the tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #93 in bed. At that time the resident was receiving care from a staff member who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #23, 1 of 29 residents reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: On 08/29/23 at 12:29 PM, during the initial tour of the facility Resident #23 told the surveyor that he/she fell out of bed about week ago because the bed is small, and they were used to a king-sized bed. The surveyor asked if there was a floor mat next to the bed at the time of the fall and resident said, I don't want a mat, I have rails on the side of the bed. Resident #23 denied any major injuries from falls and said he/she already had hip damage. On 09/06/23 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #23 in bed. The bed was in the low position. On 09/06/23 at 10:40 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #23 incidents/accidents which revealed the resident had falls on 10/4/22, 11/11/22, 11/23/22, 5/11/23 and 8/23/23. On 09/06/23 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #23 current care plan. The care plan had a focus of an actual fall related to poor impulse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all medications were administered without an error of 5% or less. During the medication observation on 7/21/23, the survey team observed two (2) nurses administer medications to three (3) residents. There were 25 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed which calculated a medication administration error rate of 8%. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Unsampled Resident #1) that were administered medications by 1 of 2 nurses on the second-floor low side nursing unit. On 8/31/23 from 8:18 AM through 9:47 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of a second surveyor, during medication pass observation of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) made the following observations: At 8:18 AM, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was collecting eaten breakfast meal trays from resident rooms and placing on the tray cart in the hallway. The CNA informed the surveyor that breakfast was served to residents at approximately 7:50 AM that day. At 8:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to have the medical director present for two out of six Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings as evidenced by the following: On 08/29/23 at 11:49 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the surveyor with six quarterly sign in sheets for the four most recent quarterly meetings which revealed: -Reporting Month of June 2022 Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Quarterly Meeting dated July 21, 2022, Medical Director's (MDs) signature was blank. - Reporting Month of December 2022/4th Quarter 2022 (QAPI) Sign In, the Medical Director's (MDs) signature was blank. During an interview on 09/01/23 at 12:56 PM, the DON stated the Medical Director did not attend the July 21, 2022 meeting and she did not attend the December 2022 meeting because she left the company. She furthered that the Medical Director should be attending the QAPI meetings. The Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Policy, implemented on 02/28/23 23 reflects that the committee shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) follow appropriate infection control practices and perform hand hygiene as indicated during a medication pass, and 2.) ensure respiratory equipment was kept in a clean and sanitary condition and stored properly to reduce the risk of infection. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication pass (Unsampled Resident #1), and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #337). 1.) On 8/31/23 from 8:18 AM through 9:47 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of a second surveyor, during medication pass observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) made the following observations: At 8:18 AM a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was collecting breakfast meal trays from resident rooms and placing on the tray cart in the hallway. The CNA informed the surveyor that breakfast was served to residents at approximately 7:50 AM that day. At 8:38 AM, LPN prepared to obtain Unsampled Resident #1's vitals including blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burlington Health and Rehabilitation CenterBurlington, WI 1 of 5Lyonsview Health And Rehabilitation CenterKnoxville, TN 1 of 5Madison Health and Rehabilitation CenterMadison, WI 1 of 5Manahawkin Health And Rehabilitation CenterManahawkin, NJ 1 of 5Suring Health and Rehab CenterSuring, WI 1 of 5Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 2 of 5Avondale Health and Rehabilitation Center, LLCHumboldt, TN 2 of 5Beloit Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, WI 2 of 5Eastview Health and Rehabilitation CenterAntigo, WI 2 of 5Highlands Health And Rehabilitation CenterMemphis, TN 2 of 5Muskego Health and Rehabilitation CenterMuskego, WI 2 of 5North Ridge Health and Rehabilitation CenterManitowoc, WI 2 of 5Oconto Health and Rehab CenterOconto, WI 2 of 5Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 3 of 5Monroe Health And Rehabilitation CenterMadisonville, TN 3 of 5Patriot Health and Rehabilitation CenterParis, TN 4 of 5Dyersburg Health And Rehabilitation CenterDyersburg, TN 4 of 5Nu Roc Health and Rehabilitation CTRLaona, WI 4 of 5Okeena Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCDyersburg, TN 4 of 5St Ann Health and Rehabilitation CenterMilwaukee, WINot rated (Special Focus)Medical Suites at Oak Creek (The)Oak Creek, WI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHAMPION CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/06/2024
FINK, EPHRAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/06/2024
CROWN BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/06/2024
RIVERSIDE REALTY NJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 05/06/2024
SCHNEIDER, CHAIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2024
SOUIDI, ANASSEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2024
RIVERSIDE NJ REALTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2024
RUVEL, MENACHEMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2024
WEINBERG, YISROELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 7%Other / private 17%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$297per resident / day
operating cost
$9,023per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$303per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315235. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next