Patriot Health and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 175 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 103.2 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 9 of 9 (Residents #1, #2, #5, #11, #14, #15, #16, #18, and #19) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility's failure to perform wound care treatments and weekly wound assessments in accordance with facility policy contributed to the deterioration of pressure ulcers/injury for Resident #14 and #18, resulting in Harm. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, dated 2/14/2023, revealed . provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries .Licensed nurses will conduct a full body assessment on all residents upon admission, weekly, and after any newly identified pressure injury. Findings will be documented in the medical record. Assessments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve palatable food at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 of 6 (Resident #7, #8, and #12) sampled residents reviewed for appetizing and palatable meals. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements. dated 12/1/2024 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by federal, state .Food will also be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Depression, Obesity, Anxiety and Diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #7 was cognitively intact. Observation and interview in Resident #7's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to maintain adequate supplies for staff or services necessary to provide for the needs of residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Hypertension, Diabetes, and Asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated that Resident #3 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 9/15/2025 at 9:57 AM, Resident #3 was asked about the facility running out of supplies. Resident #3 stated the facility ran out of toilet paper and briefs 2 weeks ago and staff had to go to [named retail store]to purchase some. 2. Review of the medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be treated with dignity was maintained for 1 of 16 (Resident #7) residents sampled for dignity. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 3/7/2023, revealed .The resident has the right to a dignified existence .The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Depression, Obesity, Anxiety and Diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #7 was cognitively intact. Review of the Care Plan revised on 12/26/2024, revealed, .resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self-care performance deficit .BATHING/SHOWERING .resident requires ext [extensive] assist by 1-2 staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 19 (Resident # 11) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive care plan will describe .The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . 2. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, Anxiety, and Depression. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, review of staff competency documentation, medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the skills and knowledge to detect changes in a resident's condition related to pressure ulcers for 9 of 9 (Residents #1, #2, #5, #11, #14, #15, #16, #18, #19) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, dated 2/14/2023, revealed .to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries .Licensed nurses will conduct a full body assessment on all residents upon admission, weekly, and after any newly identified pressure injury. Findings will be documented in the medical record. Assessments of pressure injuries will be performed by a licensed nurse and documented. The staging of pressure injuries will be clearly identified to ensure correct coding on the MDS [Minimum Data Set] .Training…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of infections when 1 of 2 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN C) failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care and 5 of 5 (LPN C, LPN D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E, CNA F, and CNA G) staff failed to wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: Wounds .and/or indwelling medical devices .Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: PPE for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities .High-contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to include a resident or family member in the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Care Plan meeting for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #3 and #18) reviewed for Care Plan Meetings. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning-Resident Participation, dated 10/18/2021, revealed .This facility supports the resident's right to be informed of, and participate in his or her care planning and treatment .the facility will notify the resident and/or resident representative, in advance .to the plan of care .and assist the resident and/or .representative to participate in choosing care . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Downs Syndrome, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dysphagia, and Anxiety. Review of the Interdisciplinary Plan of Care Review dated 11/1/2021, revealed a family member participated in the IDT meeting via phone. Review of the quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #18, #22, #56, #65, and #154) had alternative food and menu choices. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary: Resident Dietary Needs, Allergies .Preferences and Substitutes, dated 11/30/2021, revealed .To ensure that facility staff support the nutritional well-being of the residents while respecting an individual's right to make choices about his or her diet .will ensure residents are offered meaningful choices in meals/diet that are nutritionally adequate and satisfying to the individual . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights ., dated 1/2022, revealed .The facility will inform the resident .of his or her rights .The right to .receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation or resident needs and preferences .the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life .that are significant to the resident . Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the meal tray card, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate equipment necessary to maintain the ability to drink independently for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #22) reviewed for dining. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes Mellitus, and Dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13, which indicated Resident #22 was cognitively intact and was able to feed herself after tray set-up. Review of Resident #22's meal tray card revealed, .lids on all cups . for breakfast, lunch and supper meals. Observation in resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]/16/2022, 5/17/2022, 5/18/2022 and 5/19/2022, revealed Resident #22 had a constant shake/tremor in her bilateral arms and hands except while sleeping. Observation of the resident's room [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to care for a resident in a manner that maintained or enhanced their dignity for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #214) reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, revised 11/2017, showed that all staff members should promote and maintain resident dignity and respect. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #214 had a diagnoses of Ureteral Calculus Obstruction, Cystectomy, Hypertension, Dementia, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction. Observation in the resident's room on 2/24/2020 at 12:11 PM, 12:42 PM, 3:43 PM and 2/25/2020 at 4:44 PM, showed Resident #214 was seated in her wheel chair with the nephrostomy leg bag hanging on the right side of her wheel chair, uncovered and not in a dignity bag. During an interview conducted on 2/25/2020 at 4:47 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed that the nephrostomy leg bag should be covered. During an interview conducted on 2/26/2020 at 9:20 AM, the Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,150 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $30,150 — penalty dated 2025-01-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN