Burlington Health and Rehabilitation Center
677 E State St, Burlington, WI 53105 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (262) 763-9531 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0566)
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (97) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $371,858 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-14)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.4% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.2% | 5.7% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.7% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.5% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.9% | 24.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.6% | 15.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.4% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.8% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.1% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.26 | 1.66 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.09 | 2.29 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.4%CMS range 26.7–56.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.8–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 31.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.3–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
97 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. R4 is his own person. Surveyor reviewed R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score to be a 15 which indicates that R4 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. R4's Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9) score of 5 indicates that R4 has mild depression present and R4's MDS does not document any behaviors. R4's MDS documents that R4 requires limited assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting and has range of motion impairment on both upper and lower of 1 side. R4 is mobile with an electric wheelchair. Surveyor reviewed R4's comprehensive care plan and notes the following applicable: 1. R4 has a history of substance use disorder due to use of/addiction to illegal drugs. R4's drug of choice is/was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-02 · tag F0841 — isolatedDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to utilize the services of the Facility's Medical Director to ensure 1 (R2) of 1 Residents received the appropriate behavioral health services, including ensuring R2 received medications and health services as assessed. R2 had been receiving Clonazepam since being admitted in 2020. In May of 2023, the facility became aware that the psychiatric nurse practitioner (psych NP) that was seeing R2 and actively prescribing R2's antianxiety medication would no longer see R2. The psych nurse practitioner did not help refer R2 to an alternate provider and the psychiatrist supervising the psych nurse practitioner did not step in to assess R2 or help refer R2 to an alternate provider. The facility's medical director did not communicate with the behavioral practitioners to facilitate services for R2. On 7/24/23 R2's Clonazepam was discontinued. The Facility did not utilize the services of the medical director to ensure R2 had a qualified mental health practitioner to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not have an effective system to ensure residents' advanced directives for emergency end-of-life care/code status were accurate and carried out as the resident wished and did not follow facility policies to call a Code Blue when a resident was found pulseless and non-breathing. This affected 1 of 1 residents (R1) who expired while at the facility and 11 of 16 sampled residents (R11, R30, R27, R28, R29, R20, R7, R22, R23, R24, R25) whose code statuses identified delays in obtaining resident/responsible party signatures, witness signatures, signatures of the physician/nurse practitioner and at times issues with code status orders. R1's code status election forms were documented as follows: The first one was for a full code status election signed by R1 on [DATE] and Nurse Practitioner (NP)-FF on [DATE]. A second full code status election was signed by R1 on [DATE] with NP-FF signing this form on [DATE]. A third code status election form was completed however, R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect 1 of 6 residents (R10) right to be free from sexual and mental abuse by Dietary Aide (DA)-O. (DA)-O failed to maintain caregiver boundaries by engaging in a personal/sexual relationship with R10. DA-O became overly involved with R10 which included spending inappropriate amounts of time while off duty with R10, directing staff that she was providing 1:1 supervision and cares of R10, such as doing dressing changes, allowing R10 to call her for support when R10 wanted to get high, allowing R10 to watch movies at her home, assisting R10 with detoxing by providing R10 with narcotics (such as Heroin and/or Fentanyl). The facility was aware of the relationship and dynamics that were developing between DA-O and R10. On 6/28/23 the facility questioned DA-O about this relationship but did not take the steps to protect R10 from abuse from a caregiver as DA-O would be defined in her capacity as an employee of the facility. DA-O conveyed in her statements to the facility and interview that she implied to R10 and others, DA-O was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 (R10, R11 and R8) of 7 sampled residents' environment was as free as possible of accident hazards and provided with the supervision necessary to prevent accidents. * R10 was admitted to the facility with a history of drug abuse. On [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE], R10 overdosed on drugs and had to have Narcan administered. The facility did not investigate or monitor the resident and did not put effective interventions, including increased supervision, in place to prevent subsequent overdoses. On [DATE], the facility did not notify the MD or call 911 after administering Narcan for R10's overdose. * R11 was admitted to the facility with a history of drug abuse. On [DATE] and [DATE], R11 overdosed on drugs and had to have Narcan administered. The facility did not investigate or monitor the resident and did not put effective interventions in place to prevent subsequent overdoses. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment by failing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries for 2 (R7, R29) of 6 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R7 developed a facility acquired, Stage 4 pressure injury with an exposed tendon under a splint that had been applied to R7's hand. There was not a doctor order for R7's splint. The splint did not appear to have been removed for cares to check R7's skin impairment, the splint was not on the care plan or care delivery guide. Facility failure to obtain a doctor's order, care plan, and provide care for R7's splint caused R7 to develop a Stage 4 pressure injury with exposed tendon created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 1/6/2023. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Director of Nursing (DON)-B of the immediate jeopardy on 3/2/2023 at 3:28 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 1/8/2023. However the deficient practice continues at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and a comprehensive record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new injuries from developing for 1 of 3 (R13) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R13 developed a facility acquired Suspected Deep Tissue Injury (SDTI) on the left heel. Subsequent staging of the pressure injury included staging of the pressure injury as unstageable and a stage 3. While on survey, Surveyor had observations of R13's care plan interventions not implemented, including offloading of R13's heel. Findings include: R13 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's face sheet documents diagnoses that include Paraplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, heart failure, chronic Atrial Fibrillation, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, major depressive disorder, unspecified open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R11) of 3 residents reviewed received and the facility provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes, but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders. R11 was admitted to the facility with a history of Substance Use Disorder (SUD). On 11/19/22, 3/17/23, 5/4/23 and 8/3/23 R11 overdosed on drugs and had to have Narcan (Naloxone) administered. There is no indication if care planned interventions were followed through on, and whether they were evaluated for effectiveness. The facility did not assess the resident for the need of behavioral health services and specialized drug counseling. The facility did not establish plans to assess for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that wound care was documented as completed according to physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (R 2) reviewed for wound care out of a total sample of 27 residents. This has the potential to cause infection, prolonged healing, scarring, and in extreme or untreated cases, sepsis.Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Wound Treatment Management, revised 11/11/25, indicated, To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatment in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders .7. Treatments will be documents on the TAR or in the electronic health record (EHR) . Review of R2's admission Record, located in Census tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that R4 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure three residents (R2, R18, and R23) out of 18 residents in the sample who were reviewed for meal choices and alternates were regularly offered alternate meals of equal nutritional value when they declined to eat the meal they were originally served. This failure created the potential for residents to experience a poor overall dining experience and potential loss of weight. A total of 26 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include:Review of R2's admission Record, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/27/25 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on individual and group interviews, the facility does not always provide reasonable access to residents' mail. Mail that is delivered to the facility on Saturdays by the Postal Service is not delivered to the residents until the following Monday afternoon. This has the potential to affect 93 out of 93 residents in the facility.Findings include:The facility's policy document titled Resident's Rights to Privacy in Communication dated 03/04/2025 and revised 07/01/2025 documents: Definitions: Promptly means delivery of mail or other materials to the resident within 24 hours of delivery by the Postal Service (including a post office box) and delivery of outgoing mail to the Postal Service within 24 hours, except when there is no regularly scheduled postal delivery and pickup service.Explanation and compliance guidelines:1. The facility will honor the resident's right to privacy in communications including the right to:a. Send and promptly receive mail that is unopened.During Resident Council held on 08/11/2025, at 10:30 AM, R78 and R49 informed Surveyor that mail is not delivered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure the kitchen was storing and preparing food in a safe and clean manner. This has the ability to affect all 93 residents.The walk-in freezer had buildup of thick ice on the floor, walls and ceiling including boxes of food in the freezer.Two fans in food prep area had buildup of red substance making the fan appear dirty and in disrepair.A bag of lettuce salad was opened with a date that was faded so it made the date unreadable. The lettuce was brown.The exhaust fan over the stove area had a buildup of dust.No beard restraint used for Dietary Staff (DS)-LL and Dietary Manager (DM)-MM.Findings include: The facility policy regarding dietary staff attire dated 10/2023 documents:1. All staff members will have their hair off the shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap, and facial hair properly restrained.On 8/6/25, at 8:50 a.m., Surveyor toured the kitchen. Surveyor observed the walk-in cooler with a thick buildup of ice along the ceiling, walls and floor of the freezer. There were boxes in the freezer had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it completed accurate mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform electronic format to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect 93 of 93 residents residing in the facility.Staffing information for Quarter 2 (January 1 - March 31) of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) was not accurately submitted to CMS triggering a one-star staffing rating for Quarter 2: January 1-March 31 of 2025.Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705D, for Fiscal year 2025 (run on 8/4/25) which indicated the Facility had a one-star staffing rating for the 2nd Quarter (January 1-March 31).The facility document titled Facility Assessment dated 06/20/2025, documents:Overall needs per shift daily (adjust as needed) under Ratio of staff to residents or #HPRD: Night shift: RN (Registered Nurse)-1, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-1, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-4. Evening shift: RN 1, LPN 3, CNA 7. Day shift: RN 1, LPN 3, CNA 7. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a sanitary environment was maintained and the Enhanced Barrier Policy was implemented to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases potentially affecting 93 of 93 residents. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not in place throughout the facility. Two of the six units provided signs and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents that required EBP; four of the six units did not implement EBP. *R3 was in Contact Isolation and observations were made of staff entering R3’s room without putting on PPE. *R1’s wound care was observed with no EBP in place and staff did not put on PPE when providing the wound treatment. *R16’s wound care was observed with no EBP in place and staff did not put on PPE when providing the wound treatment. *R34’s wound care was observed with no EBP in place and staff did not put on PPE when providing the wound treatment. *R27 had an indwelling urinary catheter with no EBP in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to address the flies in the facility. *R15 and R16 informed Surveyor that the facility has a problem with flies and R15 uses items in the room to ‘swat’ at the flies. *Surveyor observed a fly flying around R34’s room during observation of a treatment to the right leg on 8/11/25. *Flies were observed around R8 at mealtime during the survey process and R10 informed Surveyor that R10 had killed 18 flies in 3 days. *R29 complained of so many flies they had to purchase fly strips to catch the flies in their room. *R8, R35, R49, and R78 informed Surveyor at resident council on 8/11/25 the concern of numerous flies throughout the facility. *Surveyors observed flies in resident unit hallways, the common dining room for residents, the conference room and in a resident's bathroom. *During the tour of the kitchen, several flies were observed. *The facility did not have a pest control company to service the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 1 (R59) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. This has the potential to affect all residents who resided on the unit where R59 lives from 7/2/25 through 7/9/25 when CNA-FF continued working and had access to facility residents after an allegation of abuse.*R59 informed Surveyor that CNA-FF was rough with a transfer on 7/2/25, had been rough with cares in the past and that CNA-FF was bossy and made R59 feel intimidated. On 7/2/25, R59 informed 3 different facility staff members that CNA-FF was rough with R59. This allegation of abuse was not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A per the facility abuse policy. After the allegation of abuse, CNA-FF continued working at the facility from 7/2/25 through 7/9/25. During that time, CNA-FF was scheduled to work multiple times on R59's unit.Findings include:The facility policy, with a last reviewed/revised date of 7/1/25, titled Abuse, Neglect and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected residents' status for 4 (R33, R46, R53, and R10) of 4 residents reviewed for comprehensive MDS assessments. *R33 had behavioral symptoms not directed toward others, wandering, and elopement behaviors since the time of admission. R33's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented R33 did not exhibit any behavioral symptoms or wandering. *R46 had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 1 and level 2 completed. R46's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented R46 had not been evaluated by the Level 2 PASARR. *R53 had a PASARR level 1 and level 2 completed. R53's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented R53 had not been evaluated by the Level 2 PASARR. *R10 had a PASSAR level 1 and level 2 completed. R10's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented R10 had not been evaluated by the Level 2 PASARR. Findings include: 1.) R33 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 7 (R15, R16, R24, R27, R34, R81,and R6) of 8 Residents reviewed for ADLs (Activity of Daily Living). * R15, R16, R24, R27, R34, R81,and R6 did not receive showers at least one time a week. Findings include:The facility’s Resident Showers policy and procedure reviewed/revised 6/11/25 documents:”Guideline: It is the practice of this facility to assist Residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice.” ”Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1.Residents will be provided with showers as per request and within reasonable accommodation, or as per facility schedule protocols(at least offered weekly) and based upon Resident safety.” 1.) R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Rhabdomyolysis(skeletal muscle breaks down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 79 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 5 (R15, R16, R27, R34, and R8) of 20 residents received necessary care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, a comprehensive person-centered care plan or facility policies and procedures. *R15 was observed not wearing compression stockings during the survey per physician orders and R15's plan of care. *R16 was observed not wearing compression stockings during the survey per physician orders and R16's plan of care. *R27 was observed not wearing compression stockings during the survey per physician orders and R27's plan of care. *R34 did not have a treatment completed to R34’s vascular/venous statis ulcer on 8/8/25. On 7/18/25, a physician order was obtained for R34 to receive an air mattress and R34 did not receive an air mattress until 7/21/24. *R8 had an unwitnessed fall on 4/8/25 and no neurological checks were documented as completed for R8. Findings include: The facility’s Provision of Quality Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 3 of 6 medication carts reviewed. Insulin vials and pens were not labeled, dated when opened and/or were expired. Findings include:On [DATE], at 8:42 AM, Surveyor observed the unit 5 medication cart. In the right-side drawer, Surveyor located the following:Lispro insulin vial belonging to R75 was open and used but not dated when opened. Lispro insulin pen with no label. Surveyor noted a handwritten residents' first name in black marker. The insulin pen was open and used but not dated when opened. Lantus insulin pen belonging to R6 was open and used but not dated when opened. Lantus insulin pen belonging to R33 was open and used but not dated when opened. Lispro insulin pen belonging to R33 was open and used but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure 1 (R27) of 3 Residents reviewed for indwelling catheters were treated with dignity and respect.*R27's urinary catheter bag was left uncovered with yellow urine in the catheter bag visible to peers, staff, and visitors.Findings Include:R27's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) completed 5/31/25 documents R27 has an indwelling catheter.R27's comprehensive care plan documents:R27 has indwelling catheter due to diagnosis of Neurogenic BladderInitiated 11/23/24 Revised 6/11/25On 8/11/25, at 9:55 AM, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) - X and (CNA) - Y bring R27 out of R27's room. R27 was in a wheelchair that was reclined. Surveyor observed CNA-X push R27 down the hall, turn left at the nurse's station, and continue pushing R27 down the hallway and placed R27 in the activity room. Surveyor observed other Residents in the activity room. Surveyor observed R27's catheter bag laying at the bottom of R27's legs with the urine side facing up which would be visible to other Residents, visitors, and staff. R27's foley…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not promote and facilitate 1 (R65) of 1 Resident's right to self-determination through support of R65's choice about an aspect of R65's life that is significant to R65.R65 changed rooms in the facility on 7/25/25. R65 had boxes with items important to R65 on R65's dresser and closet area. R65 went to a group activity in a common area on 8/4/25. When R65 returned to R65's room, R65's boxes and items important to R65 were gone. R65 informed Surveyor that Social Worker (SW)-J and Nurse Technician (NT)-BB entered R65's room without permission and removed R65's items. Findings include:The facility policy with a last reviewed date of 7/1/25 titled, Resident Rights documents, in part: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. The resident has the right to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure formulated advance directives were documented accurately for 1 (R3) of 20 residents reviewed for code status.Documentation in R3's medical record indicated R3 desired to be a full code (cardiopulmonary resuscitation to be administered) and a do not resuscitate (DNR). Findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives dated [DATE] documents: Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate and advance directive. 3. Upon admission, should the resident have an advance directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated to the staff. 7. During the care planning process, the facility will identify, clarify, and review with the resident or legal representative whether they desire to make any changes related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 (R5, R34 and R65) of 3 residents. *R5’s wall and heat register in R5’s room was observed to be coated with dirt and a thick layer of dust. R5’s curtains hanging over the heat register was observed to be coated with dirt and black spots. *R34’s window in R34’s room was observed to have a thick white film and appears cloudy. The outside of the window was observed to be dirty. Near R34’s window, there is a cobweb with two dead flies hanging from it. R34’s window blinds appear to be broken and not functional. *R65’s air conditioning and heating unit on R65’s wall in R65’s room was observed to be disconnected and coming off the wall on the left side. On the left side of the unit, Surveyor observed an exposed metal pipe covered in dirt and cobwebs. R65’s shared bathroom flooring is curved up to meet the tile on the walls. The flooring was observed to be peeling off the wall, exposing dirt and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R53) of 2 residents with allegations of abuse were reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A per facility policy, the state agency and one or more law enforcement entities.*On 7/2/25, R59 informed 3 different facility staff members that CNA-FF was rough with R59. This allegation was not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A, the state agency and one or more law enforcement entities. Findings include:The facility policy, with a last reviewed/revised date of 7/1/25, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation documents, in part: It is the guideline of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility has a zero-tolerance stance around founded abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (R59) of 2 residents reviewed.R59 informed Surveyor that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-FF was rough when caring for R59. On 7/2/25, R59 informed 3 different facility staff members of the alleged abuse incident. The allegation of abuse was not reported to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and the facility did not complete a thorough investigation into R59's allegation of abuse.Findings include:The facility policy, with a last reviewed/revised date of 7/1/25, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation documents, in part: It is the guideline of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility has a zero-tolerance stance around founded abuse, neglect, exploitation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not accurately screen residents for a mental disorder for 2 (R4 and R9) of 2 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I and requiring a Level II screening.R4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of mental disorders and was not evaluated on the PASARR Level I screen as having any mental disorders. The Level II PASARR was never completed due to the inaccurate PASARR Level I screen.R9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of mental disorders and was evaluated as having a serious mental disorder on the PASARR Level I screen. R9 did not have a completed Level II PASARR screen when identified as having a positive Level I PASARR screen.Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure entitled, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program dated 9/18/24, documents:The facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 3 (R1, R16 and R53) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R53 developed a facility acquired, Suspected Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) on 7/22/25. The pressure injury was incorrectly staged on 7/29/25 when it developed slough and continued to be staged as a DTI. The wound treatment was recommended to be changed but facility staff continued treating the wound with skin prep as previously ordered. On 8/5/25, the facility documented the same measurement of an unstageable wound and documented an area of DTI with a new measurement. With the changes in R53’s wound, R53’s care plan was not updated. On 8/13/25, Surveyor was provided with a late entry progress note from R53’s MD documenting a stage 2 wound in the sacral area. Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R24) of 4 Residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion.*R24 was not wearing R24's right hand splint/ right elbow brace during the survey. There was no documentation R24 was provided with physician ordered neck exercises. Surveyor did not observe any range of motion being performed.Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the facility's Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion policy and procedure revised 11/11/24:.PolicyResident who enters the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the Resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines1. The facility in collaboration with the medical director, director of nurses and as appropriate, physical/occupational consultant shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (R8, R24 and R81) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. *R8 requires the assistance of 2 with a toilet transfer. R8 was transferred to the toilet on 4/8/25 and left alone in the bathroom. R8 sustained an unwitnessed fall 2 minutes later. In interviews with Director of Rehab, Director of Nursing and other staff members, facility staff indicated R8 should not be left alone in the bathroom. R8’s care plan was not updated with a resident specific intervention after this fall. *R24’s fall interventions were not in place during Surveyor observations. *R81’s fall interventions were not in place during Surveyor observations. Findings include: The facility polity with a last reviewed/revised date of 12/3/24, titled “Fall Prevention Program” documents, in part: Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 (R34) of 2 Residents receiving oxygen (O2) therapy.*On 8/7/25, Surveyor observed R34's humidifier bottle completely empty and the humidifier bottle should have been changed on 8/6/25 per physician orders.Findings Include:The facility's Oxygen Administration policy and procedure reviewed and revised 1/8/24 documents:Policy:Oxygen is administered to Residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the Resident's goals and preferences.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. O2 is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. In such case, O2 is administered and orders for O2 are obtained as soon as practicable when the situation is under control.2. Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessment of the Resident's condition warranting oxygen and the response to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R9) of 3 residents was provided pain management consistent with professional standards of practice.R9 reported being in constant pain that frequently affected sleep and day to day activities. R9 was consistently receiving Oxycodone for pain management, which was prescribed on [DATE], and later discontinued on [DATE]. R9 was documented as having pain 10 out of 10 and went without Oxycodone pain medication on [DATE] and [DATE], after Oxycodone was discontinued on [DATE], which resulted in R9 going to the emergency room (ER) for pain management on [DATE].Findings include:R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include paralytic syndrome (a condition where there's a loss of muscle function, resulting in the inability to move part or all of the body), fracture of 1st cervical vertebra and 7th cervical vertebra (a break in the vertebrae in the neck, otherwise known as a broken neck), intervertebral disc degeneration of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not assess the risk for possible entrapment, the continued need, review the risks & benefits, and obtain consent on a quarterly basis for 3 (R24, R27, and R81) of 8 Residents reviewed having enabler bars.Findings Include:The facility's Proper Use of Bed Rails/Enabler Bars/Assist Bars reviewed/revised 3/14/25 documents:.Guideline:It is the guideline of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails (may also be referred to side rails, safety rails, grab bars, assist bars, transfer bars). Appropriate alternative approaches are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails. If bed rails are used, the facility ensures correct installation, use, and maintenance of the rails.Informed Consent .7. Informed consent from the Resident or Resident representative must be obtained after appropriate alternatives have been attempted prior to installation and use of bed rails.9. Upon receiving informed consent, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed and served as posted for 2 (R65 and R59) of 2 residents reviewed. *R65’s meal tray did not match the facility’s planned menu on 8/7/25 breakfast tray, 8/11/25 breakfast tray and 8/11/25 lunch tray. *R59’s food preferences were not followed. On 8/6/25 Surveyor observed white bread on R59's tray when white bread is one of R59’s dislikes. R59’s meal tray did not match the facility’s planned menu on 8/7/25 breakfast tray and 8/11/25 lunch tray. Findings include: The facility policy with a revised date of 10/2022, titled “Menus” documents, in part: Menus will be planned in advance to meet the nutritional needs of the resident/patients in accordance with established national guidelines. Menus will be developed to meet the criteria through the use of an approved menu planning guide. … Menus will be served as written, unless a substitution is provided in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure hospice collaboration and communication processes were established to ensure continuity of care between hospice and the facility for 1 (R8) of 3 residents reviewed for hospice.R8's hospice visit documentation, hospice plan of care, hospice responsibilities and services being provided, and hospice daily nursing visit notes, were not kept in R8's facility's electronic medical record or in R8's hospice binder.Findings include:The facility's policy, titled Hospice Services Facility Agreement, and dated 07/10/2024, documents: .4. The written agreement(s) will set out at least the following:a. The services the hospice will provideb. The hospice's responsibilities for determining the appropriate hospice plan of care.c. The service the facility will continue to provide based on each resident's plan of care.d. A communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (put on) the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing a pressure ulcer dressing change for one Resident (R) 6 out of three reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This had the potential for cross contamination and risk for infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last revised 02/05/25, revealed, It is the guideline of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities . an order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: wounds such as pressure ulcers .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Dietary Manager (DM) was designated to act as the director of food and nutrition services, when the DM position was vacant. This had the potential to affect 89 of 89 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled job description for Food Service Manager indicated . The primary purpose of your job position is to assist the Dietitian in planning, organizing, developing and directing the overall operation of the Food Services Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that quality nutritional services are provided on a daily basis and that the Food Services Department is maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Graduate of an accredited course in dietetic training approved by the American Dietetic Association. Review of an employee file provided by the facility and referred to as the employee file for the former Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, menu review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the menus and menu extensions were followed which included providing appropriate approved food substitutions and ensuring recipes were followed for 89 out of 89 residents. This failure had the potential to cause residents to lose weight. Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Menu indicated, . Menus will be planned to meet the nutritional needs of the residents/patients in accordance with established national guidelines . Review of a document provided by the facility, referred to as the weekly menu for 05/06/25, indicated the residents were to be served the following meal items: baked potato, crusted fish, rice pilaf, steamed zucchini and tomatoes, a dinner roll, and bread pudding. A tray line observation was conducted on 05/06/25 at 11:53 AM. [NAME] 1 began to serve resident meals. Kitchen staff had placed mixed fruit on resident trays at this time. [NAME] 1 stated the bread pudding was to be made the night before, and it was not available. [NAME] 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 89 of 89 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to label, date, and store food properly. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Food Storage: Dry Goods, dated 02/2023, indicated . All dry goods will be appropriately stored in accordance with the FDA Food Code . Review of a facility policy titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods, dated 02/2023, indicated . All time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code . All food will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination . During the initial tour of the kitchen on 05/06/25 at 10:30 AM with the current Dietary Manager, the following was observed: The dry storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess two of 18 sampled residents (Resident (R) 11 and R6) who were observed with medications at the bedside for the safe self-administration of medications. This failure could potentially lead to medications being left by staff at the residents' bedside where other residents could access them. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 05/2025 indicated, . It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medication after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medication may be self-administered safely. 1. Review of R11's Face Sheet, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a left ischium wound. Review of R11's admission Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of pre- and post-dialysis assessments and failed to ensure communication occurred between the facility and the dialysis center for one of two residents (Resident (R) 17) reviewed for dialysis out of total sample of 18. This had the potential to affect the health of residents receiving dialysis. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hemodialysis, revised 02/15/25, revealed, . The licensed nurse will communicate to the dialysis facility via telephonic communication or written format, such as a dialysis communication form or other form, that will include, but not limit itself to: a.timely medication administration [initiated, held or discontinued] by the nursing home and/or dialysis facility; b. physician/treatment orders, laboratory values, and vital signs; c. advance directive and code status; specific directive about treatment choices ; and any changes or need for further discussion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have medications available to administer as ordered for three of four residents (Resident (R) 7, R18, and R2) reviewed for medication availability out of a total sample of 18. This had the potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Reordering, dated December 2024, revealed, . Acquisition of medications should be completed in a timely manner to ensure medications are administered in a timely manner. Each time a nurse is administering medications and observes [6] or less doses left of one kind, that nurse will reorder the medication, time permitting . For stat medications, a supply of medications typically used in emergency situations will be maintained in limited supply by the pharmacy in a portable, but sealed emergency box or container [may be used if applicable] . 1. Review of R7's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for medications was free from significant medication errors when medications were not available and/or were not administered per physician orders. This had the potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Error Reporting and Counseling Procedure, reviewed/revised 12/2024, revealed a significant medication error meant one which caused the resident discomfort or jeopardized his or her health and safety. The policy recorded, . The relative significance of medication errors is a matter of professional judgment. Three general guidelines in determining whether a medication error is significant or not: resident condition, drug category, and frequency of error . Review of R7's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were documented for four Resident (R)1, R4, R5, and R9) of 11 residents reviewed for documentation of treatments as ordered by the physician. Failure to document medication administration and treatments to residents does not ensure the treatment or medication has been completed, and could cause a delay in treatment or medication. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Documentation in Medical Record dated [DATE], revealed, Each resident's medical record shall contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely documentation. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 01/24, revealed The resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR)/Treatment Administration Record (TAR), is initialed by the person administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 (R11, R15, R16, R3, and R7) of 12 Residents reviewed received a prompt resolution to grievances. *On 5/17/24, it is documented R11 answered yes to the question 'Do you have any concerns?' There is no evidence if the concerns were confirmed. The facility did not have any documentation the concerns/grievance was investigated promptly and resolved. *On 5/17/24, it is documented R15 answered yes to the question 'Do you have any concerns?' There is no evidence if the concerns were confirmed. The facility did not have any documentation the concerns/grievance was investigated promptly and resolved. *On 5/17/24, it is documented R16 answered yes to the question 'Do you have any concerns?' There is no evidence if the concerns were confirmed. The facility did not have any documentation the concerns/grievance was investigated promptly and resolved. *On 7/11/24, R3's representative filed a grievance with the facility and there is no evidence if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse for 2 of 5 investigations reviewed, included steps that were taken by the facility to ensure safety of the facility residents. * Visitor-HH alleged facility housekeeper-N was sexual inappropriate to the visitor when visiting a resident in the facility. The facility did not complete a thorough investigation of the allegation/actions of housekeeper-N by ensuring current facility residents were interviewed to determine if they had concerns or similar allegations regarding housekeeper-N. *R10 made an allegation of rough care that was reported to a registered nurse. This was not thoroughly investigated by the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 73 of 73 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/2/24, the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure implemented on 9/18/23 and notes the following in regards to reporting requirements: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to assure accurate dispensing and administering medications to meet the needs of each resident. This has the potential to affect R3, R7, 17 residents who reside on the 400 unit & R17. * R3's Bisacodyl (Dulcolax) 10 mg (milligram) suppository was transcribed incorrectly on 8/20/24 when R3 was readmitted from the hospital. *The Facility did not provide R7 with the ordered Coban wraps, per the physician's order. * Medications were left on top of medication cart unattended. * R17's glucose monitor was not labeled to identify it was R17's glucose monitoring device. 1.) R3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which includes C Diff (clotridoides difficile). The after visit summary for date of discharge of 8/20/24 for discharge medications under continue taking these medications which have not changed includes Bisacodyl 10 mg (milligrams) suppository. Commonly known as: Dulcolax. Under details…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 1 Resident's resident representative was notified when there was a need to alter treatment. R3's POA (Power of Attorney) was not notified when occupational therapy was discontinued on 6/26/24 and physical therapy was discontinued on 7/2/24. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Notification of Changes and last reviewed/revised 8/27/24 under policy documents The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's diagnoses includes congestive heart failure,diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. R3's power of attorney for health care was activated on 7/19/23. Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record and was unable to locate therapy progress notes to determine when R3 had previously been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that 1 allegations of abuse involving 2 Residents (R10 and R8) of 5 allegations of abuse were reported immediately. *On 5/16/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-V notified Registered Nurse (RN)-S that R10 voiced an allegation that CNA-V was rough with cares. RN-S informed CNA-V that was R10's behavior. CNA-V went back and continued cares for R10 and other Residents on CNA-V's assignment. On 5/17/24, Social Services notified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A of the allegation. Findings Include: The facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation implemented 9/18/23 documents: .Policy: It the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each Resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of Resident property. V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R10) of 2 Residents reviewed for discharge received a complete discharge summary. *R10 was discharged to an adult living home on 6/4/24 without a completed discharge summary and list of medications to allow for coordination of care and to effectively transition R10 to post-facility care. Findings Include: The facility's policy Transfer and Discharge implemented 10/26/2022, and last revised on 1/2024 documents: 14 Anticipated Transfers or Discharges -Resident -initiated discharges a. Obtain physicians' for transfer or discharge and instructions or precautions for ongoing care. b. A member of the interdisciplinary team(IDT) completes relevant sections of the Discharge Summary. The nurse caring for the Resident at the time of discharge is responsible for ensuring the Discharge Summary is complete and includes, but not limited to, the following: i. A recap of the Resident's stay that includes diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (R3 & R7) of 16 residents. * Staff did not place tubi grips on R3's bilateral lower extremities on 10/1/24 & 10/2/24. * R7's non pressure wounds were not comprehensively assessed for 7 days. There is no order for R7's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter), the PICC dressing, & care of PICC line. Facility staff were wrapping R7's legs with ace bandages when the physician's orders documented Coban. Findings include: 1.) R3's diagnoses includes congestive heart failure,diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. The resident has an ADL (activity daily living) self-care performance deficit care plan initiated 5/17/24 includes an intervention of *DRESSING: The resident requires assistance by 1 staff to dress. Assist x (times) 1 with UB (upper body) and LB (lower body) dressing, Assist x1 with grooming, Tubi Grips to BLE (bilateral lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate assistance with devices to prevent accidents for 1 (R5) of 1 resident observed for accidents. R5 required assistance of 2 staff to be transferred using a Hoyer lift. Facility staff were observed walking away from R5 during the transfer process to address other issues leaving R5 suspended in the sling and creating a potential unsafe transfer. Findings include: R5's most recent admission to the Facility was on 05/16/2022. R5's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R5 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 with a primary medical condition category of Traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction. R5 has functional limitations in bilateral upper and lower extremities, and is dependent with transfers from bed to chair. Surveyor reviewed R5's care plan and noted R5 requires the assist of 2 staff for transfer with a Hoyer. Full body sling / Xlarge. No Ambulation. On 10/01/2024, at 11:06 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 1 resident was provided with appropriate food items for a renal/LCS (low concentrated sweets) diet as prescribed by the physician. R3 was served french fries and a tomato slice on 10/1/24. Findings include: The Renal Diet/Liberal Renal Diets/Renal LCS (low concentrated sweets) from [Name] Food Service not dated under description documents The renal/liberal rental diets regulate sodium, potassium, and fluid intake. The renal diet also regulates protein. These diets are primarily prescribed to patients with renal (kidney) disease. There are many stages of renal disease ranging from Acute Renal Failure to End-stage Renal Disease. However, a protein-restricted diet is generally only used for patients with acute or chronic renal failure who are not on dialysis. It is is important to follow the appropriate individualized guidelines set by a physician and registered dietitian nutritionist knowledgeable in treating patients with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 (R3) of 1 residents with a tracheostomy. The facility did not change R3's HME (heat moisture exchanger) trach valve daily according to physician orders. Findings include: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's diagnoses include chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, and paralysis of vocal cords and larynx. The physician orders include with an order date of 5/17/24 Change HME trach valve daily one time a day for tracheostomy care. An HME trach valve traps the moisture and heat from exhaled gas allowing it to be recycled on inspiration and also helps keep large particles out of the lung such as food particles. Surveyor reviewed R3's May 2024, June 2024, July 2024, August 2024, September 2024 & October 2024 MAR (medication administration record) and noted licensed staff are checking & initialing the HME trach valve is being changed daily with a scheduled time of 0800 (8:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (R6) of 5 Residents reviewed for antibiotic use. *R6 began having Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) symptoms on 7/16/24. R6 had a urinalysis (UA) and culture lab test collected by the facility staff on 7/17/24 and Rocephin (an antibiotic medication) was ordered to start on 7/18/24. R6 requested to go to the emergency room (ER) on 7/17/24 due to R6's UTI symptoms. The ER doctor prescribed Bactrim (an antibiotic medication) to start on 7/18/2024. On 7/19/24, R6 received Rocephin and Bactrim for R6's UTI symptoms. On 7/20/24, R6's urinary culture results came back and Macrobid (an antibiotic medication) was ordered to start on 7/20/2024 by the on-call Medical Doctor (MD). On 7/20/24, R6 received Rocephin, Bactrim and Macrobid for R6's symptoms of UTI. On 7/21/24, R6 requested to return to the ER and was prescribed Fosfomycin (an antibiotic drug). On 7/21/24, R6's doctor, MD-U identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure its medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater. The facility medication error rate was 20%. *R14 received crushed Depakote (delayed release) and administered 8AM scheduled medications, including Carbidopa-levodopa, at 10:04 AM. *R8 received 8AM scheduled Gabapentin and Tramadol medications at 10:26 AM. *On 10/1/24 R3 did not receive Complex B-100 extended release with biotin & folic acid per physician orders and did not receive the correct dosage of Carvedilol. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled, Medication Administration dated 01/24, documents in part, . Medication Preparation: . 5. b. Long-acting, extended release or enteric-coated dosage forms should generally not be crushed; an alternative should be sought. Medications Administration: . 14. Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time, except before or after meal orders, which are administered based on mealtimes. Unless otherwise specified by the prescriber, routine medications are administered according to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 1 residents were free of significant medication errors. R3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with discharge medications to include Carvedilol 25 mg every 12 hours. The facility did not change the dosage when R3 was readmitted and continued the previous dose of 12.5 mg. R3 received the incorrect dosage from 8/20/24 until 10/3/24 when DON (Director of Nursing)-B spoke with R3's physician on the telephone. R3 received the incorrect dose of Carvedilol 69 times during August and September 2024. Findings include: R3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses includes bilateral lower extremity edema, hypertension, and congestive heat failure. Under hospital course for date of discharge 8/20/24 under the section PCP (primary care physician) to Follow up: documents: -Maintain care of tracheostomy and re-evaluate need for continued use. -re-evaluate need for Keppra. -maintain COVID-19 precautions -Medication changes: -complete 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 1 (R3) of 2 Residents. * Appropriate hand hygiene was not observed during trach & incontinence cares for R3 who is on contact isolation for C diff (Clostridioides difficile). Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Management of C. (Clostridioides) Difficile Infection and not dated under policy documents This facility implements facility-wide strategies for the prevention and spread of Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) infections. Under #5. General principles related to contact precautions for C. difficile: b. documents Hand hygiene shall be performed by hand washing with soap and water in accordance with facility policy for hand hygiene. The facility's policy titled Hand Hygiene and date implemented 12/23/22 under policy documents All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents and visitors. This applies to all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for potential sexual abuse was provided medically related social services to assist R1 in attaining or maintaining their mental and psychosocial health. * On 5/18/24, R1 was approached by her spouse to have sexual relations while R1 resided at the facility. The facility was made aware of R1's spouse's intentions to have sexual relations with R1 prior to 5/18/24 but took no steps on 5/18/24 to ensure that R1 could consent to having sexual relations. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Left Hand Contracture, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. R1's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/15/24 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00, indicating that R1 is severely cognitively impaired. Section E (Behavior) documents that R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility did not distribute and serve food in a manner that prevents foodborne illness to 74 out of 74 (census 76, 2 NPO) residents who receive their meals from the main serving kitchen. *Cook-K was observed grabbing ready to eat food with gloved hands, after touching non-sanitized food surfaces, and placing the ready to eat food on plates for residents to eat. *Dietary Aide-M was observed touching nose with gloved hands while transferring yogurt from large container to individual service containers. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Food Safety-Food Handling with revision date, 7/20/2019, states in part: Purpose To ensure food handling practices are consistent with USDA Food Code guidelines. To comply with federal and state regulations governing food safety and prevention of foodborne illness and to comply with state and local ordinances governing food safety. Policy 1. Food handling practices shall be completed in a manner to protect food safety and avoid cross contamination. 2. Safe food practices shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 6 (R2, R12, R33, R35, R39, & R46) of 13 Residents reviewed for a room change within the facility, were provided with prior written notice, including reason for the room change. *R2 transferred to another room on 4/12/24 and did not receive prior written notice, was not given a choice or rooms, and did not meet potential roommate prior to the transfer. There is no documentation that R2's guardian was provided written notice. *R12 transferred to another room on 2/28/24 and did not receive prior written notice, was not given a choice or rooms, and did not meet potential roommate prior to the transfer. There is no documentation that R12's guardian was provided written notice. *R33 transferred to another room on 4/9/24 and did not receive prior written notice, was not given a choice or rooms, and did not meet potential roommate prior to the transfer. *R35 transferred to another room on 4/30/24 and did not receive prior written notice, was not given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4.) R52 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Cerebral palsy, asthma, blindness right eye, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, developmental disorder, anxiety, seizures. R52 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Surveyor conducted a review of R52's plan of care that indicates R52 has the potential for falls, accidents and incidents due to immobility, impaired cognition, unaware of safety needs. Interventions included padded side rail to prevent bruising to extremities from swatting/ hitting when anxious. The need for padded side rail was added on 8/10/23. The plan of care also states that R52 has self- care deficit due to cognitive deficits, disease process/ progression due to his cerebral palsy, blind in both eyes. Interventions include that R52 needs the assist of 1 for bed mobility. Also the use of 1/4 side rails to aide in positioning was added to the plan of care on 2/13/23. The admission/ readmission/ routine head to toe evaluation, dated 3/2/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that 2 (R47 &R322) of 7 facility reported incidents investigations reviewed were reported to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incidents, after the initial reporting and with the results of the investigations of each alleged violation. Findings include: The facility's policy with no date and titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation documents: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes . B. The Administrator will follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to confirm the initial report was received, and to report the results of the investigation when final within 5 working days of the incident, as required by state agencies. 1. R47 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not incorporate the recommendations from the Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 2 determination and evaluation report into a Resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 (R52) of 1 Resident reviewed with PASARR level 2 recommendations. *R52's PASARR dated 7/21/21 determination states R52 needs specialized services to address R52's developmental disability needs. Findings Include: Policy Review: Specialized Rehabilitative Services ( date implemented- blank, Date reviewed- blank, Date revised- blank) Policy: The facility shall provide or obtain services from an outside resource for specialized rehabilitative services if required by the resident's comprehensive assessment and care plan to assist them to attain, maintain or restore their highest practicable level of physical mental functional and psycho- social well- being, as well as ensure that residents with Mental Disorder ( MD), Intellectual Disability ( ID) or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility did not ensure a complete baseline care plan was developed and addressed all of the resident's needs within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R371) of 2 sampled residents for new admission. R371's baseline care plan did not address R371's enabler bar usage on the baseline plan of care. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, with implementation date, February 2023, states in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The baseline care plan will: a. Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. b.Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to: i.Initial goals based on admission orders. ii.Physician orders . 2 b. Interventions shall be initiated that address the resident's current needs including: i. Any health and safety concerns to prevent decline or injury . ii. Any identified needs for supervision . iii. Any special needs such as IV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R32) of 1 Resident reviewed for communication with the use of hearing aides, received proper treatment and assistive device to maintain R32's hearing abilities. Findings Include: R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Metabolic Encephalopathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypo-osmolality and Hyponatremia, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. R32 has an activated health care power of attorney(HCPOA). R32's Significant Change Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated [DATE] documents R32's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score to be a 0 indicating R32 demonstrates severely impaired skills for daily decision making. R32 has no behaviors documented. R32's Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9) score is 8 indicating mild depression. R32 has no range of motion(ROM) impairment on upper extremities, and does have ROM impairment on bilateral lower extremities. R32's MDS documents R32 is dependent for dressing, mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that , based on a comprehensive assessment, provided the appropriate treatment and services to restore continence , to the extent possible, for 1 out of 2 residents ( R19) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. This is evidenced by: Policy Review: Incontinence Date implemented: ( blank), Date Reviewed/ Revised ( blank). Policy: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, all residents that are incontinent will receive appropriate treatment and services. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: ( includes) 1. The facility must ensure that residents who are continent of bladder and bowel upon admission receive appropriate treatment, services, and assistance to maintain continence unless his or her clinical condition is or becomes such that continence is not possible to maintain. 4. Residents that are incontinent of bladder or bowel will receive appropriate treatment to prevent infections and to restore continence to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure a Resident with a gastrostomy tube received the appropriate care and services for 1 (R60) of 3 Residents with gastrostomy tubes. *R60's water flush bag and tube feeding was not labeled for two days during the survey process. R60's tube feeding pump had not been calibrated to ensure proper flow rate. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's undated Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes policy and procedure and notes the following: 10. Direction for staff regarding how to manage and monitor the rate of flow will be provided: a. Use of gravity flow b. Use of a pump c. Periodic evaluation of the amount of feeding being administrated for consistency with practitioner's orders d. Calibration of enteral feeding pumps to ensure that pump settings accurately provide the rate and volume consistent with the Resident's care plan. e. Periodic maintenance of feeding pumps consistent with manufacturer's instructions to ensure proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R321) of 1 Residents reviewed for dialysis. * R321 receives dialysis three times per week. R321's dialysis center communication records are not being completed by Facility nurses. Findings include: 1. R321 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and encephalopathy. R321 is dependent upon renal dialysis and attends dialysis three times per week. On 5/9/24, Surveyor reviewed R321's medical record, including physician's orders and comprehensive care plans. Surveyor was unable to locate any dialysis communication forms for R321 in R321's medical record. On 5/9/24 at 12:45 PM, Surveyor requested R321's dialysis communication forms that are to be completed on R321's dialysis days. On 5/9/24 at 2:25 PM, Nurse Consultant-C approached Surveyor for interview. Nurse Consultant-C told Surveyor that the facility had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the pharmacist recommendations made during the monthly record review were not reported to the attending physician and were not acted upon for 1 of 5 (R37) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R37's pharmacy recommendations were not acted upon by the physician. Findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Regimin Review (not dated) documents (in part) . .The drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the resident's medical chart. 1. Medication Regimen Review (MRR), or Drug Regimen Review, is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes: a. Review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication erros, or other irregularities. 4. The pharmacist shall document, either manually or electronically, that each medication regimen review has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 2 (R3 and R37) residents reviewed. Morning medications are not administered within timeframe specified and are often administered after 11 AM along with noon medications. The facility policy titled Medication Administration (not dated) documents (in part) . .10. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: a. Right resident b. Right drug c. Right dosage d. Right route e. Right time f. Right documentation 12. Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time. b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by the physician. On 5/8/24 at 9:43 AM, during initial interview, R3 reported the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) is an idiot because she has only 1 nurse for wings 1 and 2. R3 stated: Sometimes I don't get my 8 AM (morning) meds (medications) until 2 PM (afternoon) and sometimes I don't get my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 3 of 3 medication carts had insulin vials dated with the open date and insulin pens that have expired after being open removed from the medication cart. This affected 4 residents (R35, R30, R56 and R29) On [DATE] Surveyor observed medication carts from 200, 300, and 400 hall. The 200 hall had insulin vials opened and not dated. The 300 hall had an insulin pen that expired after it was opened on [DATE]. The 400 hall had an insulin pen that expired after it was opened on [DATE]. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:55 a.m. Surveyor observed the 200 hall medication cart. Surveyor observed R30 humalog insulin vial opened but not dated. Surveyor also observed R35 lispro insulin vial opened but not dated. Surveyor showed RN(Registered Nurse)-G the insulin vials open and not dated and asked what is the facility's policy regarding insulin vials. RN-G stated once an insulin vial is opened it is dated with the date it was opened and only good for 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure hospice services providing end of life were coordinated for 1 (R32) of 3 sampled Residents receiving hospice services. *R32 was admitted on hospice on 4/8/24. R32's hospice binder did not have a physician certification of terminal illness, physician orders, documentation of visits, schedule of hospice visits with hospice team listed, and the facility did not designate a specific individual of the facility's interdisciplinary team to act as a liaison between the facility and the hospice provider. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Hospice Program policy and procedure and notes the following applicable: .Policy Interpretation and Implementation 9. In general, it is the responsibility of the hospice to manage the Resident's care as it relates to the terminal illness and related conditions, including: a. Determining appropriate hospice plan of care b. Changing the level of services provided when it is deemed appropriate c. Providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement effective infection prevention measures. This included observation of a nurse touching medications with bare hands during medication pass on two occasions. Observation of two residents having their catheter bag on the floor multiple times during the survey affecting 2 of 4 residents sampled with catheter bags. * The facility did not ensure R371 and R372's catheter bags were maintained in a sanitary manner. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Indwelling Catheter Use and Removal, with no implementation or revision date, states in part: Compliance Guidelines: .4. If an indwelling catheter is in use, the facility will provide appropriate care for the catheter in accordance with current professional standards of practice and resident care policies and procedures . .7.e. Securement of the catheter to facilitate flow of urine, prevention of kinks in the tubing and positioning below the bladder . Surveyor notes no further infection prevention guidelines in policy. 1) .On 05/08/24 at 09:44 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This is an uncorrected deficiency from survey event: VLJH12. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 1 allegations of abuse involving R32 was reported immediately to the State Survey Agency. On 10/2/23, it is documented that a male Resident who was monitored to not be on R32's wing was found in R32's bed. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure implemented 9/18/23 and notes the following in regards to reporting requirements: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each Resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of Resident property. III Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of Resident property, and exploitation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This is an uncorrected deficiency from survey event: VLJH12 Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure an allegation involving potential sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 Resident (R32) reviewed for allegations of abuse. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure implemented on 9/18/23 and notes the following in regards to reporting requirements: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each Resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of Resident property. III Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of Resident property, and exploitation that achieves: A. Establishing a safe environment that supports, to the extent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) R2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 10/19/23. Diagnoses includes paraplegia, anxiety disorder, other psychoactive substance abuse, depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. R2 does not have an activated power of attorney for healthcare. The resident requires assistance with discharge planning care plan created 2/5/20 and initiated & revised on 10/19/23 documents the following interventions: * Assist resident with adjustments to the residential setting so that he has a sense of control that is maintained throughout. Created 2/5/20 and initiated & revised 10/19/23. * Consult with the physician, therapy, and other disciplines regarding progress toward discharge goals. Make arrangements for appropriate placement and update. Created 2/5/20 and initiated & revised 10/19/23. * When discharging o [sic] (to) the community, provide for continuity of care after discharge. Provide medication list and information on scheduled appointments and on-going treatments.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-14 · tag F0566 — widespread1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review 1 of 1 (R1) resident's employed by the facility did not have a care plan or appropriate job description before employment at the facility began. This deficient practice has the potential of affecting all 97 residents in the building. * R1 has a history of resident-to-resident abuse and excessive alcohol consumption while in the facility. Before employment, the facility had R1 sign a job description for a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a policy that indicated R1 would answer call lights of other residents. Finding include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included alcohol abuse and left foot amputation. R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was reviewed and R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated R1's cognitive status for daily decision making skills was fully intact with both long- and short-term memory. R1's medical record was reviewed and indicated that on 6/22/23, R1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate 4 of 7 reportable incidents reviewed for abuse and misappropriation involving R10 and R15. * R10 was in a sexual relationship with an employee at the facility, Dietary Aide (DA)-O. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A was made aware of inappropriate incidents on 6/28/23 and 7/22/23 between DA-O and R10 that were not fully investigated. NHA-A was also aware that R10 had been to DA-O's home and did not investigate the incident. * On 8/9/23 R15 reported missing $30.00. The facility's investigation did not include interviews with direct care staff to see if they had any knowledge of R15's missing money. The facility's investigation did not include interviewing other residents on R15's unit to see if any other resident may have had missing money/items. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Policy and Procedure: Abuse and Neglect Reporting and Investigating with a revision date of 5/9/19. Documented was: .IDENTIFICATION,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a performance review for 5 of 5 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) reviewed. This had the potential to affect a pattern of all 85 residents who reside in the facility as the 5 CNA's work throughout the building as needed. Findings include: On 8/28/23, the facility policy titled Competency Evaluation, dated 12/22 was reviewed and read: Subsequent and or annual competency is evaluated at a frequency determined by the facility assessment, evaluation of the training program, and/or job performance evaluations. Employee competency forms are maintained by the Staff Development Coordinator's office for the current training year, then forwarded to the Human Resources Director for placing into the employee's personnel file. On 8/28/23 at 9:00 AM, the Surveyor asked for the performance reviews for: CNA-N who was hired by the facility on 10/08/21, CNA-W who was hired by the facility on 01/02/07, CNA-X who was hired by the facility on 10/13/09, CNA-Y who was hired by the facility on 01/24/19, and CNA-Z who was hired by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility's assessment, last updated 8/8/23, indicates the number/average range of residents the facility can care for with active or current substance use disorders is 15 residents. The facility's assessment was not specific in regards to residents with substance abuse disorders and the level of care they are able to provide for those residents. The facility assessment does not include available resources for narcotic substance abuse that is available to the residents for support services. The facility assessment does not indicate if the facility has a professional in substance abuse with drug and treatment expertise who would be able to assist with resident support and facility resources. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the 15 residents (per facility assessment) who are active with or experience substance disorders. Findings include: During this onsite complaint investigation, the survey team was informed of two (R10 and R11) residents residing in the facility with diagnosis of substance disorders and who had repeated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that staff promptly consulted with a physician when residents experienced significant changes of condition for 1 (R11) of 4 residents reviewed for change of condition. R11 had a history of drug and alcohol abuse and had an order to update the MD if any signs and symptoms were noted of drug use. The facility did not update the MD on 9 different occasions when staff documented R11 had overdose signs and symptoms. Findings include: R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Multifocal Osteomyelitis, Hypertensive Urgency and Anxiety. Surveyor reviewed R11's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 3/2/23. Documented under Cognition was a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. R11 had a history of substance abuse and overdosed on 11/19/22, 3/17/23, 5/4/23 and 8/3/23 under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Surveyor reviewed R11's MD Orders.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report 3 of 7 reportable incidents (involving R10), reviewed for abuse to the State Agency. * R10 was in a sexual relationship with an employee at the facility, Dietary Aide (DA)-O. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A interviewed DA-O on 6/28/23 and 7/22/23 and asked questions about the relationship. NHA-A was also aware that R10 had been to DA-O's home; that was confirmed during an interview on 8/8/23. The facility did not investigate these allegations and did not report any of the allegations of abuse to the State Agency. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Policy and Procedure: Abuse and Neglect Reporting and Investigating with a revision date of 5/9/19. Documented was: .IDENTIFICATION, INVESTIGATING, AND REPORTING OF ABUSE: Abuse is defined differently under both State and Federal law and Regulation. Please review the key definitions in this policy that should be considered when determining whether an event constitutes abuse. Definitions: Resident Abuse under the Federal Certification Guidelines 42 C.F.R.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility did not store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 108 residents. * Surveyor observed 18 unopened boxes on the floor of the freezer. Boxes were there for two days of the survey. * Surveyor observed large amounts of ice buildup in the freezer. Ice buildup was scattered across the ceiling, down the walls and on boxes of food. * Food brought in by residents and family members were stored in a refrigerator in the shared activity and dining room and food items were not discarded by the use by date of the food. Findings include: A facility policy, entitled Food Receiving and Storage, dated October 2017, specified: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. 1. Food Services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times. 6. Food in designated dry storage areas shall be kept off the floor . 12.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a facility-wide assessment was conducted to determine what resources were necessary to competently care for its residents during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing at the facility. *The Facility Assessment Tool, dated 1/7/2023, did not identify the facility's need for the Infection Preventionist role or the designated hours per week necessary to perform their duties. An Infection Preventionist is responsible for managing the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. *The Facility Assessment Tool, dated 1/7/2023, did not include a completed facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach to create an emergency preparedness plan, including a water management plan, that met current standards of practice. *Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A revised the Facility Assessment Tool during the survey in front of Surveyor without communication with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing (DON), or the Governing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure as part of their infection prevention and control program they had an effective water management plan based upon the individual characteristics of the facility. The facility failed to implement a Water Management program to prevent the transmission of Legionnaires Disease which has the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility. Based upon observation and interview, the facility failed to provide infection control measures according to professional standards of practice for 1 (R29) of 4 Residents reviewed for wound care. The facility did not disinfect a scissors used during wound care when transitioning from dirty to clean supplies. Findings include: 1.) The facility policy and procedure entitled Legionella Water Management Program from MED-PASS ©2001 revised 7/2017 states: 1. As part of the infection prevention and control program, our facility has a water management program, which is overseen by the water management team. 2. The water management team will consist of at least the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility did not implement their abuse policy in regards to screening 3 of 8 employees (Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA)-AA, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-J and CNA-BB. * CNA-AA was hired on 6/14/22. Caregiver and criminal background checks were not completed until 3/1/23. The Background Information Disclosure (BID) was not completed by CNA-AA until 3/1/23. * LPN-J was hired on 4/22/22. Caregiver and criminal background checks were not completed until 3/1/23. * CNA-BB was hired on 7/27/16. Caregiver and criminal background checks were not completed every 4 years. The Background Information Disclosure (BID) was not found by the facility. This had the potential to affect a pattern of residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 3/1/23 the employee background information was reviewed for a sample of 8 employees the following employees did not have the required background check information available: * CNA-AA was hired on 6/14/22. Caregiver and criminal background checks were not completed until 3/1/23. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure antibiotic protocols were used to prevent the unnecessary administration of antibiotics to 9 (R3, R34, R12, R11, R5, R84, R8, R38, and R13) of 19 residents reviewed for antibiotic usage. *R8, R38, R3, R34, R12, R11, R19, R84, and R13 did not meet the criteria for the use of an antibiotic. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Antibiotic Stewardship from MED-PASS ©2001 revised on 12/2016 states: Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The purpose of our Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. 2. Orientation, training and education of staff will emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship and will include how inappropriate use of antibiotics affects individual residents and the overall community. 8. When a nurse calls a physician/prescriber…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews and facility document reviews, the facility did not implement measures to protect a resident from sexual abuse. This was discovered in 2 facility self reports involving (R23 & R76) of 9 facility self-report investigations. On 2/15/23 R23 touched R76 inappropriately in their genital area. R23 had a documented history of previously engaging in inappropriate activity with residents including kissing other residents. The facility had not assessed residents, including R76, for their ability to understand and consent to sexual activity/relations. The facility self report indicates the social worker sat down with R23 and R76 to clarify their relationship. The self report continues to indicate the power's of attorney for both R23 and R76 were contacted and stated they do not have an issue with their relationship but would prefer that the residents were not visiting in each others rooms. The consent for a relationship is not something that can be deferred to a responsible party. The facility did not take steps to prevent this incident from occurring as no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews/ and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 3 Residents (R162, R94 & R462) of 5 residents reviewed who potentially had a crime committed against them. R94 had a resident-to-resident verbal altercation in which R162 expressed being very afraid of R94. The facility did not notify the police of R94's threat to R162. Agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Z was verbally and physically abusive towards R94 and Agency CNA Z was asked to leave the facility. The facility did not call the police. Additionally, the facility did not investigate threats made to another resident by CNA Z that staff referenced in their statements. R45 had an allegation of misappropriation of R462's funds and the facility did not call the police and the investigation was not completed and submitted to the state agency. Findings include: The facility abuse policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and interview, the facility did not ensure investigations of allegations of neglect involving 2 Residents (R61 & R42) of 2 allegations of neglect were reported timely to the state agency. The facility did not ensure investigated allegations of neglects involving R61 and R62 were submitted timely to the state agency as facility administration forgot to submit the investigations to the state agency. Findings include: 1.) R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of epilepsy, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and obesity. R61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R61 was severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 and needed extensive assistance with bed mobility and cares. On 1/4/2023 at 8:22 PM in the progress notes, nursing charted R61 fell out of bed while receiving care by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The progress note at 9:25 PM stated the CNA was providing cares to R61 and while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for 1 (R262) of 22 sampled residents. * R262 had an order on admission to have a shower daily. The order was not transcribed and R262 only received a weekly shower while in the facility. Findings include: R262 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] status post a cerebral shunt replacement and had a surgical wound to her head. On 3/1/23 R262's hospital discharge instruction dated 12/27/23 were reviewed and read: Post operative VP (Venticulooeritoneal) shunt instructions. Showering: please shower daily. Gentle cleaning and rinsing of the incision is ok. On 3/1/23 R262's treatment and daily care records were reviewed. Showering daily was not included in the records. Shower weekly on Tuesday was on the care record and documented as completed while R262 was at the facility. On 3/2/23 at 10:30 AM Regional Nurse Consultant-G was interviewed and indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and assistive devised were used to prevent accidents for 3 (R61, R37, and R463) of 6 residents reviewed for falls. R61 fell out of bed on 1/4/2023 while receiving cares with the assist of one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The facility staff were not following F61's plan of care: R61 required the assist of two CNAs when receiving cares per the Care Plan. R37 had three falls out of bed, 11/5/2022, 11/23/2022, and 12/15/2022, without having a body pillow in place. R37 was to have a body pillow in place per plan of care. Multiple observations were made during the survey of no body pillow in place when R37 was in bed. R463 fell on [DATE] when being transferred with no gait belt in place. R463 was to have a gait belt used when transferring per plan of care. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing from MED-PASS ©2001 revised on 3/2018 states: Based on previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R17 and R262) of 7 residents reviewed for weight loss had their nutritional care needs recognized, evaluated, and addressed to provide adequate parameters of nutritional status. * A review of R17's admission weight on 8/10/22 was documented at 198 pounds in the medical record and the admission nutritional assessment documented an admission weight of 220 pounds. The Dietician disputed the admission weight value with no further follow up or reweigh. R17's documented weight on 8/30/22 was 177.6 pounds which was a 10.30% weight loss from 198 pounds. The facility did not implement an intervention until 10/25/22. * R262 was not assessed for fluid needs on admission. R262 was not screened for beverage preferences and there was no care plan for dehydration. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Nutrition and Hydration Guideline, dated 10/3/22, states: Purpose: The intent of this requirement is that the resident maintains, to the extent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R85) of 5 residents reviewed receiving psychotropic medication were free from unnecessary drugs. *R85 had orders for a psychotropic medications and did not have specific documented targeted behavior monitoring and/or specific reasons for use of the medication in their medical records. R85 did not have specific targeted behaviors for administration of psychotropic medication addressed in her plan of care. Findings include: On 3/1/23 the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Management Guidelines dated 08/22 was reviewed and read: Upon admission the Licensed Nurse will implement the following: Physicians order for the medication including an approved diagnosis or Target Behavior. The Interdisciplinary Team will individualize the resident care plan and address the diagnosis and specific behavior for the drug. R85 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Dementia and Depression R85's Initial MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/16/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that medical records contained documentation related to Influenza and/or Pneumococcal immunizations for 3 (R20, R105, R85) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. R20's medical record did not contain documentation indicating the facility offered or administered the Influenza or Pneumococcal vaccine. R103's medical record did not contain documentation indicating the facility offered or administered the Pneumococcal vaccine. R85's medical record did not contain documentation indicating the facility offered or administered the Influenza or Pneumococcal vaccine. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised October 2019 states: All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/ pneumococcal infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-18 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a qualified social worker was employed on a full-time basis for a period of approximately two months. The facility, certified for more than 120 beds, did not have a qualified social worker to provide for and meet the needs of the 94 residents residing in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet resident psychosocial needs.Findings include: On 06/16/26 at 9:45 AM, observation of the facility license hanging on a wall by the 100/200 units revealed the facility was licensed for 123 beds. Review of the Facility Assessment, provided by the facility and approved on 06/20/25, indicated the Number of residents for which we are licensed to provide care: Licensed Beds: 123, Certified beds: 123. Review of the undated Social Services/Social Worker Assistant Job Description, provided by the facility, indicated, The primary purpose of your job position is to plan, organize, develop, and assist the overall operation of our facility's Social Services Department in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$371,858 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $86,790 — penalty dated 2024-05-14
- $285,068 — penalty dated 2023-09-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-13 for 22 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-14 for 53 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE BAY AT BURLINGTON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2017 |
| RUVEL, MENACHEM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2018 |
| WEINBERG, YISROEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525482. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.