No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Suring Health and Rehab Center

430 Manor Dr, Suring, WI 54174 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (920) 842-2191 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$84,425 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $84,425 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-15)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
307 Manor Dr · (920) 842-2144 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
117 N McKenzie Ave · (920) 848-6323 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
14253 CR-M · (920) 883-7663 · Call to confirm hours
Park
414 E Brook St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.8%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.3%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.7%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.7%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.3%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.7%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.5%24.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.5%82.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%23.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.5%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.171.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.622.291.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
36.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 36.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.2–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge36.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting68.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.311.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
48.6%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 47.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-28)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (R1) received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) and failed to ensure a change of condition was recognized and acted upon timely.On 8/26/25, R1 complained of increased pain and difficulty breathing. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified and indicated R1 could have additional acetaminophen up to 4000 milligrams (mg) in a 24 hour period in addition to tramadol and could use diclofenac or stock pain reliever for back/shoulder pain. The NP also gave an order to try to wean R1 off oxygen which the NP presumed was used for anxiety/pain and indicated if R1 continued to require oxygen, staff should notify the NP. The orders were not transcribed in R1's medical record at that time. According to staff interviews, R1 was tearful, reported ongoing pain and difficulty breathing, and cried out in pain during the evening hours. R1's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of medication. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 40 residents residing in the facility.The facility's controlled substance record books were missing signatures for narcotic counts.Findings include:The facility's Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability policy, revised 4/15/24, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high-quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental exposure .All controlled substances are accounted for in one of the following ways: .ii. All controlled substances obtained from a non-automated medication card or cabinet are recorded on the designated usage form. Written documentation must be clearly legible with all applicable information provided .h. The controlled drug record serves the dual purpose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 6 residents (R) (R12, R13, R2, R7, R14, and R15) of 12 sampled residents.R12 had a gastric tube. An enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) sign was not posted outside the entrance to R12's room. R12's care plan stated R12 was on universal precautions.R13 had a right heel wound with daily dressing changes. An EBP sign was not posted outside the entrance to R13's room. R13's care plan stated R13 was on universal precautions.R2 had a colostomy. An EBP sign was not posted outside the entrance to R2's room. R2's care plan stated R2 was on universal precautions.R7 had wounds that required daily dressing changes. An EBP sign was posted outside the entrance to R7's room. A PPE cart in R7's room contained a contact/isolation sign. R7's care plan stated R7 was on universal precautions. A PPE cart in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 3 residents (R) (R3, R4, and R10) of 3 sampled residents.Staff did not use a gait belt while assisting R3 with a transfer.On 4/4/26, R4 fell out of bed and fractured their right humerus (long bone in the upper arm that extends from the shoulder to the elbow). Staff indicated the bed malfunctioned and/or the mattress moved during cares. An intervention was not added to R4's care plan post-fall.R10 fell on 4/16/26. An intervention was not added to R10's care plan post-fall.Findings include:The facility's Safe Resident Handling/Mobility/Transfers policy, revised 11/29/23, indicates: .Mechanical lifting equipment or other approved transferring aids will be used based on the resident's needs to prevent manual lifting, except in medical emergencies .Resident lifting and transferring will be performed according to the resident's individual plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 46 residents residing in the facility.The facility had a COVID-19 outbreak that ended in February of 2026. The facility did not complete N95 fit testing for staff since 2022.Findings include:The facility's Respirator Protection and Fit Testing policy, revised 1/1/2026, indicates: It is the expectation to protect residents, staff, and visitors from airborne infectious disease (e.g., tuberculosis, COVID-19, influenza with aerosol-generating procedures) by ensuring appropriate respirator use and fit. The facility will implement and maintain a respiratory protection program, including medical evaluation, fit testing, training, and proper use of respirators in accordance with: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Respiratory Protection Standard (29 CFR 1910.134); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 3 residents (R) (R6, R7, and R9) of 6 sampled residents.Paint, drywall, and plaster compound were left in an unoccupied room that was accessible to residents.Findings include:The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) (Date of Preparation October 17, 2015) for [NAME] SUPERPAINT Interior Satin Latex wall Paint, Extra [NAME] indicates: .Section 3 - Hazardous Identification: Routes of Exposure: Inhalation of vapor or spray mist .Effects of overexposure .In a confined area, vapors in high concentration may cause headache, nausea, or dizziness .Section 7: Handling and Storage: Keep out of the reach of children .Section 8 - Exposure Controls/Personal Protection: Precautions to be Taken in Use: Use only with adequate ventilation .Removal of old paint by sanding, scraping, or other means may generate dust or fumes that contain lead. Exposure to lead dust or fumes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility.R37 tested positive for Influenza on 1/21/26. There was not a contact/droplet sign or a personal protective equipment (PPE) cart outside R37's room. In addition, staff completed cares without the proper PPE.R2 was on precautions due to a diagnosis of Influenza A. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-L did not don the appropriate PPE and Registered Nurse (RN)-I reused a disposable gown to enter R2's room. In addition, RN-I removed an N95 respirator prior to exiting the room.R43 was on droplet precations due to a diagnosis of Influenza A. CNA-E and CNA-K did not don appropriate PPE prior to entering R43's room.R7 tested positive for COVID-19. There was an enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) sign outside R7's room and a PPE cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement their antibiotic stewardship program to ensure the accurate use of antibiotics for 4 residents (R) (R13, R9, R11, and R2) of 7 sampled residents.R13 did not meet Loeb's criteria for a urinary tract infection (UTI) but received antibiotic therapy. The physician was not consulted to determine if the antibiotic should have been continued when R13 did not meet the criteria for a UTI.R9 did not meet Loeb's criteria for a UTI but received antibiotic therapy. The physician was not consulted to determine if the antibiotic should have been continued when R9 did not meet the criteria for a UTI.R11 did not meet Loeb's criteria for a respiratory tract infection but received antibiotic therapy.R2 was prescribed a prophylactic antibiotic. R2's medical record did not indicate the prophylactic antibiotic was routinely assessed for continued use.The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy, revised 5/29/24, indicates: .a. Infection Preventionist -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper physician or Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) notification for 3 residents (R) (R36, R22, and R5) of 12 sampled residents.R36's physician was not notified of an elevated blood pressure on 1/28/26. R36's physician was not notified when R36's pulse was less than 50 on 1/27/25, 1/22/26, 1/21/26, 1/20/26, 1/19/26, 1/17/25, and 1/16/26. In addition, R36's physician was not notified when R36's anti-hypertensive medication was held.R22's physician was not notified when R22's anti-hypertensive medication was held.R5 tested positive for Influenza A on 1/23/26. R5's POAHC was not notified of the positive test or that R5 started Tamiflu.Findings include: The facility's Notification of Change policy, revised 8/27/24, indicates: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form (which is used to inform residents of their final day of Medicare Part A insurance coverage and standard claim appeal rights and instructions) was thoroughly completed when provided to 3 residents (R) (R57, R58, and R59) of 3 sampled residents. R57, R58, and R59 were issued written NOMNC forms when their Medicare Part A services were ending. The facility did not ensure the forms included all of the required information. Findings include: Notice Instructions for Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-10123 form) indicates a Medicare provider/plan .must deliver a completed copy of this notice to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing services. The CMS-10123 form requires providers to manually or electronically enter coverage type, effective date, and a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) name and number. 1. From…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, resident, and family interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adaptive equipment to maintain the current level of function and prevent contracture was provided for 1 resident (R) (R6) of 1 sampled resident.R6 did not have rolled towels placed in the left hand and elbow crease and as ordered. In addition, R6's care plan contained an intervention for a left hand splint to be worn at all times. The splint was not consistently applied.Findings Include:The facility's Restorative policy, revised 2/5/25, indicates: It is the guideline of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level. Restorative nursing program refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining all physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning .3. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 resident (R) (R20) of 3 sampled residents.Staff did not ensure R20's cigarettes, lighter, and e-cigarette were kept in a secure location. In addition, a smoking evaluation completed for R20 was not accurate and indicated R20 could store smoking materials independently.Findings include:The facility's Smoking policy, dated 10/25/22, indicates: Facilities may permit residents to smoke tobacco products. In these facilities, assessment of capabilities and deficits determines whether or not supervision is required. If the facility identifies that the resident needs assistance and supervision for smoking, the facility includes this information in the care plan, and reviews and revises the plan periodically as needed. The facility must ensure precautions are taken for residents' individual safety, as well as the safety of others in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary tube feeding services for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 2 sampled residents. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D turned off R7's tube feeding before it was complete and without checking with a nurse. Findings include: The facility's Care and Treatment of Tube Feedings policy, revised 8/21/24, indicates: The resident's plan of care will address the use of feeding tube, including strategies to prevent complications. From 1/26/26 to 1/28/26, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of gastrostomy status. A care plan, revised 1/8/26, indicated R7 had an alteration in nutrition because R7 required tube feeding following a hospital stay. The care plan contained an intervention for Osmolite 1.2 474 milliliters (ml) via gastrostomy (G) tube three times daily .Observe .toleration to tube feeding.On 1/27/26 at 9:38 AM, Surveyor observed CNA-D exit R7's room and tell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of medication for 2 residents (R) (R36 and R22) of 7 sampled residents. R36's vital signs were not completed on 1/27/26 prior to administering metoprolol and clonidine. R36's vital signs were not completed timely on 1/27/26, 1/22/26, 1/21/26, 1/20/26, 1/19/26, 1/18/26, and 1/17/26 prior to administering and/or holding metoprolol, amlodipine, lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and clonidine for a low pulse. R36's physician and standing orders to hold metoprolol and clonidine when R36's pulse was less than 50 were not followed on 1/22/26, 1/21/26, 1/20/26, 1/19/26, and 1/16/26. In addition, R36's metoprolol, amlodipine, lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and clonidine were not administrated timely on 1/27/26, 1/22/26, 1/21/26, 1/20/26, 1/18/26, and 1/17/26.R22's physician and standing orders were not followed when staff held lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide on 1/27/26.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a stock medication was labeled and administerd in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations for 1 resident (R) (R54) and 1 staff (Registered Nurse (RN)-R). On [DATE], the medication room contained Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative, Mantoux (an injectable solution used for skin testing to diagnose latent tuberculosis (TB) infections) which had a handwritten date of 4/25 or 4/28 on the outer package. Staff confirmed the medication should contain an open date and that once opened, the solution should be used within 30 days. The solution was used to administer TB tests for R54 and RN-R. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) Mantoux Tuberculin Skin Test Facilitator Guide 2003 instructs to date the tuberculin vial when opening and discard it after 30 days. The facility's policy Medication Administration policy, with a review date of [DATE], indicates: .13. Identify expiration date. If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment was free from abuse for 5 residents (R) (R3, R5, R6, R10, and R11) of 10 sampled residents. R3, R5, R6, R10, and R11 reported to staff on multiple occasions that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D was rough with cares and they did not want CNA-D to provide care or enter their rooms. The facility did not implement measures to ensure R3, R5, R6, R10, R11 and other residents were free from abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised 7/1/25, indicates: It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse .V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse: A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse .or reports of abuse occur .VI. Protection of Resident: The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, resident, and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency (SA) for 5 residents (R) (R3, R5, R6, R10, and R11) of 10 sampled residents. R3, R5, R6, R10, and R11 reported to staff that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D was rough with cares. The facility did not report the allegation of abuse to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised 7/1/25, indicates: Reporting/Response: Report all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services, and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, resident, and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 6 residents (R3, R1, R5, R6, R10, and R11) of 10 sampled residents. R3 reported an allegation of abuse to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A regarding Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse. R1's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) reported allegations of abuse to the local police department. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegations of abuse. R5 and R5's family reported that CNA-D was rough with cares and R5 did not want CNA-D to provide care or enter R5's room. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse. R6 reported that CNA-D was rough with cares and did not want CNA-D to touch R6. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse. R10 reported that CNA-D was aggressive with cares and pushed a urinal into R10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure notifications were completed in a timely manner following a fall with injury for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 7 sampled residents. R1 incurred a head injury during a Hoyer lift transfer on 11/14/24 when the lift tipped over on R1 and a metal bar struck R1 in the forehead. The facility did not notify R1's Hospice agency until 11/19/24 or R1's physician until 11/21/24. Findings include: The facility's Incidents and Accidents policy, dated 12/29/22, indicates: .5. The following incidents/accidents require an incident/accident report but are not limited to: .equipment malfunction, observed accidents/incidents, resident injuries due to staff handling .9. The nurse will contact the resident's practitioner to inform them of the incident/accident, report any injuries or other findings, and obtain orders if indicated, which may include transportation to the hospital dependent upon the nature of the injury(ies) .12. Documentation should include the date,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. R1 was transferred from bed to Broda chair via Hoyer lift on 11/14/24. Staff did not ensure R1's catheter bag was disconnected from the bed prior to the transfer which created resistance and caused the Hoyer lift to fall and strike R1 in the head. R1 exhibited signs and symptoms of a head injury but was not offered the opportunity to seek medical evaluation at the hospital. Findings include: The facility's Accidents and Supervision policy, revised 12/29/22, indicates: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents .b. The facility should make a reasonable effort to identify the hazards and risk factors for each resident .3. Implementation of Interventions: Use specific interventions to try to reduce a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 4 sampled residents. R4 had an indwelling Foley catheter. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not initiated for R4. In addition, R4's uncovered catheter drainage bag was in contact with the floor during provision of cares on [DATE]. Findings include: The facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy indicates an order for EBP will be obtained for residents with any of the following: .indwelling medical devices such as urinary catheters. Implementation of EBP will include making gowns and gloves available immediately outside the resident's room. Personal protective equipment (PPE) will be worn during high-contact resident care activities, such as dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs, or assisting with toileting, etc.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene while plating food. Staff did not wear a beard net that covered all facial hair while plating food. Staff did not check the water temperature of the sanitizing solution prior to testing the parts per million (ppm). Findings include: On 9/2/24 at 8:24 AM, Surveyor began an initial tour of the kitchen with [NAME] (CK)-E who stated the facility followed the Federal Food Code. Hand Hygiene: The 2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code documents at 3-304.15 Gloves Use Limitation: (A) If used, single-use gloves shall be used for only one task such as working with ready-to-eat food or with raw animal food, used for no other purpose, and discarded when damaged or soiled, or when interruptions occur in the operation. The facility's Handwashing policy, with a review date of 3/14/24, indicates: 1. When to wash hands: a. When entering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure diet orders and menus were followed to ensure nutritional needs were met for 13 residents (R) (R30, R16, R1, R11, R12, R20, R24, R2, R10, R4, R6, R5, and R7) of 13 residents. During the 9/3/24 lunch meal, the facility served full serving desserts and did not offer diet desserts or ¼ size servings for R30, R16, R1, R11, R12, R20, R24, R2, R10, R4, R6, R5, and R7 who were ordered carbohydrate-controlled diets. During the 9/3/24 lunch meal, the facility did not ensure all menu items were served to residents. Findings include: The facility's Therapeutic Diet Orders document, dated 4/9/24, indicates: The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician, and/or assessed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to support the resident's treatment/plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences .therapeutic diet is a diet ordered by a physician, or delegated registered or licensed dietician, as part of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure court-ordered protective placement was obtained for 1 resident (R) (R26) of 16 sampled residents. R26 was under guardianship. The facility did not ensure court-ordered protective placement in the least restrictive environment was obtained after R26's nursing home stay exceeded 60 days. Findings include: From 9/3/24 to 9/5/24, Surveyor reviewed R26's medical record. R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. R26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/17/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 which indicated R26 had severely impaired cognition. R26 had a guardianship that was activated on 1/24/22. R26's medical record did not contain protective placement paperwork. On 9/4/24 at 8:55 AM, Surveyor interviewed Social Worker (SW)-H who confirmed R26 had a guardian but did not have protective placement in the facility. SW-H indicated a law firm completed R26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, resident, and family interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to prevent and/or promote healing of pressure injuries for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 4 sampled residents. R5's plan of care indicated R5 had left buttock and right sacral moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) and contained an intervention to turn/reposition R5 every 2-3 hours. The intervention was not consistently implemented. Findings include: The facility's Turning and Repositioning policy, with an implementation date of 6/25/24, indicates: All residents at risk of or with existing pressure injuries, will be turned and repositioned, unless it is contraindicated due to a medical condition. In this case, small shifts in repositioning will be employed. Turning and repositioning is a primary responsibility of nursing assistants; however, all nursing staff are expected to assist with turning and repositioning. From 9/3/24 to 9/5/24, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a cervical collar was implemented per the physician's order for 1 resident (R) (R32) of 1 sampled resident. R32 was admitted to the facility following a neck fracture. During an observation on 9/3/24, R32's cervical collar (neck brace) was on R32's bed. R32 indicated the collar should be on. R32's plan of care did not indicate when R32 should wear the collar or if the collar could be removed. Findings include: From 9/3/24 to 9/5/24, Surveyor reviewed R32's medical record. R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra (fracture in upper neck). R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/27/24, stated R32's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 out of 15 which indicated R32 had intact cognition. R32's medical record indicated R32 was responsible for R32's healthcare decisions. On 9/3/24 at 10:10 AM, Surveyor entered R32's room. R32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide necessary treatment and services related to nutrition for 2 residents (R) (R17 and R13) of 3 sampled residents. R13 was at risk for weight loss and R13's dentures were missing. R13's diet was not altered until the R13's dentures were found. Registered Dietitian (RD)-J was not contacted per the physician's request to review R17's tube feeding when a new medication was started. Findings include: 1. From 9/3/24 to 9/5/24, Surveyor reviewed R13's medical record. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of moderate protein calorie malnutrition. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/3/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated R13 had intact cognition. R13's medical record indicated the following: ~ A mini-nutritional assessment, dated 7/29/24, indicated R13 was malnourished. ~ R13's plan of care indicated R13 had altered nutrition, a history of chewing problems,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection during the provision of care for 2 residents (R) (R12 and R29) of 2 sampled residents. On 9/4/24, staff did not complete proper hand hygiene during medication pass for R12 and R29. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 12/23/24, indicates: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility .2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to the attached hand hygiene table. The hand hygiene table attached to the policy indicates staff should perform hand hygiene before preparing or handling medication. On 9/4/24 at 8:20 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-F prepare medication for R12. After medication preparation, RN-F did not perform hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a vaccination was offered for 1 resident (R) (R10) of 5 sampled residents. R10 was not offered the PCV20 vaccination in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and the facility's policy. Findings include: The facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) policy, with an implementation date of 6/2023, indicates: It is our policy to offer residents .immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations. 2. Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunization unless it is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. Following assessment for any medical contraindications, the immunization may be administered in accordance with physician-approved standing orders .7. A pneumococcal vaccination is recommended for all adults 65 years and older and based on the following recommendations: For adults 65 years or older who have received PCV13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a potential allegation of misappropriation was reported timely to the State Agency for 1 Resident (R) (R5) of 5 residents reviewed. R5 notified staff that R5's checkbook was missing. Staff did not report R5's missing checkbook to administration who in turn did not report the potential allegation of misappropriation to the State Agency. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, with a copyright of 2023, indicated: Reporting/Response: Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services, and to all other required agencies (e.g., Law Enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/30/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    4. On 7/31/23, Surveyor reviewed R20's medical record. R20's medical record did not contain a written notification of transfer for a hospital transfer on 5/18/23. Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a written notification of transfer, including the reason for the transfer, location of the transfer, appeal rights, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was provided for 6 Residents (R) (R23, R32, R47, R20, R15, and R39) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization. R23 was not provided a written transfer notice when R23 was transferred to the hospital on 6/5/23, 7/12/23, and 7/26/23. R32 was not provided a written transfer notice when R32 was transferred to the hospital on 7/10/23. R47 was not provided a written transfer notice when R47 was transferred to the hospital on 6/27/23. R20 was not provided a written transfer notice when R20 was transferred to the hospital on 5/18/23. R15 was not provided a written transfer notice when R15 was transferred to the hospital on 5/23/23 and 5/26/23. R39 was not provided a written transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate and safe administration of pharmaceuticals for 5 Residents (R) (R34, R27, R18, R40, and R5) of 5 sampled residents and with the potential to affect all 22 residents residing on the 100 wing. On [DATE], Surveyor intervened before R34 was administered an inaccurate and expired dose of docusate sodium (used to promote bowel movements). On [DATE], R27 was administered an inaccurate and expired dose of docusate sodium. On [DATE], R18 was administered an inaccurate and expired dose of docusate sodium. R40 was administered outdated Artificial Tears (used to treat dry eyes) eye drops from [DATE] through [DATE]. In addition, on [DATE], R40 self-administered six oral medications. The facility did not assess R40 for safe self-administration of medication and did not obtain a physician's order for R40 to self-administer medication. On [DATE], Surveyor observed medications left at R5's bedside. R5 did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician was notified timely of a change in condition for 1 Resident (R47) of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalization. R47's physician was not notified when there was blood in R47's urine. Findings include: The facility's Notification of Changes policy, copyright 2022, indicated: Compliance guidelines; the facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring notification. 2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in heath, mental or psychosocial status. This may include: b. Clinical complications. R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, dementia, and urge incontinence. Between 8/1/23 and 8/2/23, Surveyor reviewed R47's medical record which indicated R47 had an indwelling catheter. A progress note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not document, investigate, and/or record resolution of a grievance for 1 Resident (R) (R198) of 17 residents reviewed for grievances. The facility did not document and investigate a grievance expressed by R198. Findings include: The facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy, copyright 2023, indicated: 10. Procedure: b. The staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form, or assist the resident or family member to complete the form. i. Take immediate actions needed to prevent further potential violations of any resident right. 11. Evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances will be maintained for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision. R198 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stage 4 pancreatic cancer. R198 was admitted to hospice services on 3/17/23. R198 was R198's own person. Between 7/31/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement their abuse policy in regard to screening 3 of 8 employees reviewed for background checks. An out of state background check was not completed for Driver (DR)-F who resided in another state within 3 years of hire. Hospitality Aide (HA)-H's Background Information Disclosure (BID) form was not dated. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-G's background check was not completed within the last four years. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy indicated: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property .1. Screening A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credentials checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it was free of a medication error rate of 5% or greater. During medication administration observations, 4 errors occurred during 29 opportunities which resulted in a 13.79% medication error rate affecting 2 Residents (R) (R34 and R40) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. On [DATE], Surveyor intervened before R34 was administered an inaccurate and expired dose of docusate sodium (used to promote bowel movements). In addition, on [DATE], R34 was not administered a scheduled dose of Coenzyme Q10 (used to promote heart health in certain patients). On [DATE], Surveyor intervened before R40 was administered an expired dose of Artificial Tears (used to treat dry eyes) eye drops. In addition, on [DATE], R40 was not administered a scheduled dose of cyclosporine emulsion (used to treat dry eyes caused by inflammation). Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 06/2023, indicated: Medications are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure coordination of hospice services for 1 Resident (R) (R198) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility did not receive hospice notes or a hospice care plan for R198 which resulted in R198's medications not being adjusted per hospice's request. Findings include: A contract between the facility and Hospice Company (HC)-L indicated: Hospice plan of care definition: written care plan established, maintained, and reviewed and modified, at intervals identified by the Hospice interdisciplinary team in coordination with Facility and each Hospice patient's attending physician. The Hospice plan of care will reflect (iv) drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the Hospice Patient. Responsibilities of Facility: Provision of services: Facility Services: .Facility shall comply with each Hospice Patient's Hospice plan of Care .Coordination of Care: Hospice and Facility shall communicate with one another regularly and as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene for 1 Resident (R) (R34) of 7 residents observed during the provision of care. During an observation of care for R34 on 8/1/23, Registered Nurse (RN)-M did not consistently perform appropriate hand hygiene. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 06/2023, indicated: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility .Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table .The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves .The attached Hand Hygiene Table indicated either Soap and Water or Alcohol Based Hand Rub (ABHR), with ABHR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$84,425 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $84,425 — penalty dated 2025-09-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burlington Health and Rehabilitation CenterBurlington, WI 1 of 5Lyonsview Health And Rehabilitation CenterKnoxville, TN 1 of 5Madison Health and Rehabilitation CenterMadison, WI 1 of 5Manahawkin Health And Rehabilitation CenterManahawkin, NJ 1 of 5Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 2 of 5Avondale Health and Rehabilitation Center, LLCHumboldt, TN 2 of 5Beloit Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, WI 2 of 5Eastview Health and Rehabilitation CenterAntigo, WI 2 of 5Highlands Health And Rehabilitation CenterMemphis, TN 2 of 5Muskego Health and Rehabilitation CenterMuskego, WI 2 of 5North Ridge Health and Rehabilitation CenterManitowoc, WI 2 of 5Oconto Health and Rehab CenterOconto, WI 2 of 5Riverside Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCTrenton, NJ 2 of 5Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 3 of 5Monroe Health And Rehabilitation CenterMadisonville, TN 3 of 5Patriot Health and Rehabilitation CenterParis, TN 4 of 5Dyersburg Health And Rehabilitation CenterDyersburg, TN 4 of 5Nu Roc Health and Rehabilitation CTRLaona, WI 4 of 5Okeena Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCDyersburg, TN 4 of 5St Ann Health and Rehabilitation CenterMilwaukee, WINot rated (Special Focus)Medical Suites at Oak Creek (The)Oak Creek, WI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RUVEL, MENACHEMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL48%since 06/01/2019
WEINBERG, YISROELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL48%since 06/01/2019
CHAMPION CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$725K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 14%Other / private 38%

This home reported $725K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$257per resident / day
operating cost
$7,800per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$260per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525363. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next