Monroe Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 62.4 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to clean and store kitchen equipment in 1 of 1 kitchen and failed to maintain 1 of 1 walk in freezers in a sanitary condition which had the potential to affect 65 of 65 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitization, dated 12/2008, revealed .All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by using the manual or mechanical means . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, dated 3/26/2025, revealed .Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process .all equipment used in the handling of food shall be cleaned and sanitized in a manner to prevent contamination . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Sanitation Inspection, revealed It is the policy of this facility .part of the .sanitation program, to conduct inspections to ensure food service areas are clean, sanitary, and in compliance .Sanitation inspections…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 5 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #114, #116, #117 and #118) of 8 rooms observed on 1 of 2 hallways for a clean and sanitary environment.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Routine Bathroom Cleaning, dated 6/2025, revealed .provide a clean and sanitary environment for residents .clean entire toilet including handle and underside of flush rim. Apply disinfectant and allow sufficient contact time .report areas of .damaged items in need of repair .Review of the facility policy titled, Routine Cleaning and Disinfection, dated 6/2025, revealed .it is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible .During observations on 2/23/2026 at 10:56 AM, 2/24/2026 at 11:00 AM, and 2/25/2026 at 2:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the State Designated Authority (State Agency) for 1 resident (Resident #37) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, dated 7/2025, revealed .it is the guideline of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment .immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies .when suspicion of abuse .occur .the licensed nurse will notify the Administrator or designee .the Administrator or designee .will notify the appropriate agencies .obtain statements from direct care staff .suspend the accused employee .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, History of a Stroke with Right Hemiparesis (weakness), and Chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was investigated for 1 resident (Resident #37) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 7/2025, revealed alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff .but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be an indication of .abuse .An Immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur . Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses and others who might have knowledge of the allegations . providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation .taking all necessary actions as a result of the investigation .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, Lippincott Nursing Center website review, medical record review, observation, pharmacy documentation review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure basic standards for the rights of medication administration were followed for 1 resident (Resident #25) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration.The findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration, revealed .ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed .Right resident .Right drug .Right dosage .Right route .Right time .Right documentation .Review MAR [Medication Administration Record] to identify medication to be administered .Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, time .Review of the Lippincott Nursing Center Website resource of the Nursing Drug Handbook dated 2025- 2026, revealed .Medication Errors in Nursing .As a final step in the administration process .and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure an order was obtained for oxygen (O2) administration, failed to ensure O2 warning signs were placed on the resident's door, and failed to ensure tubing was changed timely for 1 resident (Resident #61), failed to ensure oxygen tubing (nasal cannula) was stored appropriately for 2 residents (Residents #61 and #41), and failed to administer O2 at the prescribed physician rate for 1 resident (Resident #5) of 6 residents reviewed for O2 administration. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated 1/8/2024, revealed .Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician .Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition warranting oxygen and the response to oxygen therapy .Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated .Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care needs related to dialysis were consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 resident (Resident #5) of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hemodialysis, dated 12/2024, revealed .The facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice .the facility will coordinate and collaborate .to assure that the resident's needs related to dialysis treatments are met .the facility will ensure that the physician's orders for dialysis include .The type of access for dialysis (e.g. [for example] graft, arteriovenous shunt, external dialysis catheter) and location .the dialysis schedule .nephrologist name and phone number .dialysis facility name and phone number .transportation arrangements to and from the dialysis facility .any medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy provided an accurate physician prescribed medication for 1 resident (Resident #25) of 3 residents observed for medication administration. The findings include:Review of the Pharmacy Services Agreement, dated 2/2023 and continued as current agreement, revealed .Responsibilities of the Pharmacy .maintain accurate drug profiles, consistent with the information provided to the Pharmacy, on each facility resident served by pharmacy .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension (high blood pressure), Polyneuropathy (nerve damage), and Alcohol Use, Unspecified, With Withdrawal.Review of a comprehensive care plan for Resident #25 dated 1/19/2026, revealed .The resident has altered cardiovascular status r/t [related to] Hypertension .Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess the dental status and assist in providing alternate funding sources or delivery systems to meet the dental needs of 1 resident (Resident #43) of 3 residents reviewed for dental services. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Dental Services, dated 11/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine .and emergency dental care .'Routine dental services' means .smoothing of broken teeth .'Emergency dental services' includes services needed to treat an episode of acute pain in teeth .broken, or otherwise damaged teeth .the dental needs of each resident are identified through the physical assessment and MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment processes, and are addressed in each resident's plan of care .oral/dental status shall be documented according to assessment findings .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record for 3 residents (Resident's #77, #5, and #6) of 24 sampled residents.The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention Program, revised 10/01/2025, revealed .When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will .document all evaluations/assessments and actions taken . Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication Administration, revealed .Review MAR [Medication Administration Record] to identify medication to be administered .Remove medication from source .Administer medication as ordered .Sign MAR after administered . The findings include: Review of the facility policy Fall Prevention Program dated 10/08/2024, revised 10/01/2025, revealed .When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will .document all evaluations/assessments and actions taken . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $483K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN