No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oconto Health and Rehab Center

101 First St, Oconto, WI 54153 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (920) 834-4575 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2023Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$18,819 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $18,819 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
820 Arbutus Ave Ste 102 · (920) 834-8833 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
Trepanier0.8 mi
1012 McDonald St · (920) 834-4276 · Call to confirm hours
Park
298 7th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.0%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.4%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.0%16.9%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.6%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.0%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.4%24.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.8%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.0%82.2%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.7%CMS range 39.1–68.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.7–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.0–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 40.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-17)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. On 6/8/24, R1 exited the facility without signing out and told staff when found that R1 intended to walk to a location in another city that was 37 miles from the facility. On 6/14/24, R1 exited the facility without signing out and told staff when found that R1 intended to walk to the same location. On 7/30/24, R1 left the facility and was found by police walking on a county highway that was 1.4 miles from the facility. On 8/6/24, R1 exited the facility without signing out and was found by police after 9:00 PM walking into on-coming traffic on an interstate highway off-ramp that was over 1.5 miles from the facility. On 8/18/24, R1 left the facility and was found by police walking on a country road approximately 4 miles from the facility. The road was on the opposite side of the highway from the facility and there were overpasses which R1 likely walked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a safe environment that was free from abuse for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. On 10/2/23 at approximately 7:45 PM, R1 told Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C that R2 had inappropriately touched R1 and had tried to get into R1's brief. CNA-C indicated the incident didn't happen and no action was taken. Approximately fifteen minutes later at 8:00 PM, staff heard R1 yell. Staff entered R1's closed door and observed R2, who was completely disrobed, on top of R1 and inappropriately touching R1. The facility's failure to supervise a resident who allegedly sexually abused another resident created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 10/2/23 at approximately 7:45 PM. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A of the immediate jeopardy on 10/19/23 at 3:15 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed and corrected on 10/2/23 at 8:00 PM. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not report allegations of abuse and exploitation to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 1 sampled resident.R4 informed staff on 2/6/26 that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C stated R4 could not get out of bed for a limited amount of time. R4 also reported that CNA-C accepted a gift from R4. The allegations of abuse and exploitation were not reported to the SA. Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 7/1/25, indicates: It is the guideline of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property .The facility will have written procedures that include: Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services, and to all other required agencies within specified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and exploitation for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 1 sampled resident.R4 informed staff on 2/6/26 that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C stated R4 could not get out of bed for a limited amount of time. R4 also reported that CNA-C accepted a gift from R4. The allegations of abuse and exploitation were not thoroughly investigated. Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 7/1/25, indicates: It is the guideline of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property .An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur.From 3/24/26 to 3/25/26, Surveyor reviewed R4's medical record. R4 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure continuous positive airway ressure (CPAP) machines were cleaned for 3 residents (R) (R1, R2, and R3) of 3 sampled residents. R1, R2, and R3 used a CPAP machines for obstructive sleep apnea (a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). Staff did not clean the CPAP machines per medical orders and facility policy. Findings include: The facility's CPAP/BiPAP Cleaning policy, revised 6/11/25 indicates: It is the expectation of this facility to clean CPAP/bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) equipment in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and manufacturer's recommendations in order to prevent the occurrence or spread of infection .6. Clean mask frame daily after use with CPAP cleaning wipe or soap and water. Dry well. Cover with plastic bag or completely enclosed in machine storage when not in use . 1. On 3/24/26, Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident was free of a significant medication error. R1 was prescribed clindamycin (an antibiotic) for facial cellulitis following a hospital visit on 12/15/25. R1 missed five doses of the antibiotic when it was not available from the pharmacy. The facility did not update the physician about the missed doses. R1's wound worsened and R1 requested to be transferred to the hospital again on 12/17/25. R1's wound was irrigated, debrided, and packed. R1 received intravenous (IV) antibiotics and was discharged with wound care orders and oral antibiotics. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, revised November 2024, indicates: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 40 residents residing in the facility.The facility's dryers contained lint that covered approximately three-quarters of the of the bottom of the lint trap and was approximately one inch high.Findings include:On 9/17/25, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A confirmed the facility's dryers are Unimac Alliance laundry systems dryers.The Unimac Alliance Laundry Systems Dryer operator's manual indicates: 1. Inspect the area surrounding tumble dryers, remove all combustible materials, including lint, before operating the machines .3. Clean lint from lint compartment and screen to maintain proper airflow and avoid overheating .Before cleaning the lint screen, open tumble dryer door and allow cylinder to completely stop. a. Open the lint panel. b. Remove all accumulated lint in the lint compartment area. Lightly brush any lint that may be left on the lint screen. c. Be sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine (which delivers a stream of oxygenated air to a person's airway) was used under a physician's order and cleaned appropriately for 1 resident (R) (R21) of 1 sampled resident.R21 used a CPAP machine. R21 did not have a physician's order to use the machine or orders to maintain and clean the machine. In addition, R21 did not have a diagnosis that supported use of the machine.Findings Include:The facility's admission Orders document, revised 5/1/25, indicates: A Physician, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner, or Clinical Nurse Specialist must provide written and/or verbal orders for residents' immediate care and needs .The written and/or verbal orders should include at a minimum: a. Dietary; b. Medication orders, if indicated; c. Routine care orders; .The orders should allow facility staff to provide essential care to the resident consistent with the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R38, R35, and R8) of 7 sampled residents received a pneumococcal vaccine as indicated.Upon admission to the facility, R38, R35, and R8 signed consent to receive a pneumococcal vaccine. The vaccines were not administered. In addition, a physician order to administer the vaccine was not obtained for R8. Findings include:The facility's General Immunization/Vaccination policy, revised 3/30/25, indicates: It is the guidelines of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from infectious disease by offering our residents, staff members, and volunteer workers immunization/vaccination against such diseases .7. Following assessment for potential medical contraindications, the specified vaccination(s) may be administered in accordance with physician-approved standing orders if such are used, or a practitioner order is obtained .12. In case of lack of availability of the specified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R33) of 7 sampled residents received education regarding the risks and benefits of a COVID-19 vaccine and did not ensure the vaccine was administered. R33 requested to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The facility did not transcribe a physician's order for the vaccine or administer the vaccine per R33's request.Findings include:The facility's General Immunization/Vaccination policy, revised 3/30/25, indicates: It is the guidelines of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from infectious disease by offering our residents, staff members, and volunteer workers immunization/vaccination against such diseases .7. Following an assessment for potential medical contraindications, the specified vaccination(s) may be administered in accordance with physician-approved standing orders if such are used, or a practitioner order is obtained .8. COVID-19 Immunization: a. Residents and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 1 sampled resident. R7's physician was not updated when a reddened and painful skin area on R7's groin and scrotum worsened. Findings include: The facility's Notification of Changes policy, last reviewed 8/27/24, indicates: The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician .when there is a change .3. Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment. This may include: a. New treatment. b. Discontinuation of current treatment due to: i. Adverse consequences. ii. Acute condition. iii. Exacerbation of a chronic condition . From 3/11/25 to 3/12/25, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia, epilepsy, schizophrenia, anxiety, and traumatic brain injury. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/22/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 which indicated R7 had moderately impaired cognition. R7 had a Guardian who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a grievance was documented, thoroughly investigated, and resolved for 1 resident (R) (R18) of 19 sampled residents. Guardian (GDN)-I (R18's court-appointed Guardian) submitted a grievance on 2/25/25 regarding concerns with cleanliness, R18's roommate, and showers. The grievance form indicated there was follow-up on 2/26/25, however, GDN-I indicated GDN-I was not updated regarding all components of the grievance and how the grievance was resolved. Findings include: The facility's Grievances policy, revised 10/22/24, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to provide a process to voice grievances (such as those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) and respond with prompt efforts to resolve while keeping the resident and/or resident representative appropriately apprised of progress toward resolution .Our facility will promote the grievance process throughout the organization. This includes notifying residents of their rights related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 19 sampled residents. R1 indicated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E was abusive to R1. R1 reported the incident to staff. The allegation of abuse was not reported to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, dated 12/2/24, indicates: An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur .the facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services, and to all other required agencies within specified time frames: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury . From 3/11/25 to 3/12/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 19 sampled residents. R1 and R1's Power of Attorney for Healthcare ((POAHC)-J) reported an allegation of physical abuse to staff that involved Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 12/2/24, indicates: An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation; .3 Investigating different types of alleged violations; 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation; 5. Focusing the investigation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure showers, feeding assistance, and activities of daily living (ADLs) were performed by a qualified person for 2 residents (R) (R15 and R19) of 19 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 41 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not ensure Hospitality Aide (HA)-D performed responsibilities that were within HA-D's scope of practice when HA-D assisted with showering, feeding, and transferring R15 and R19. Findings include: On 3/11/25 at 6:26 PM, Surveyor interviewed R15 who indicated HA-D completed cares, showers, and transfers for R15 and assisted with washing and getting R15 dressed. (R15 wished to remain anonymous. R15's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R15 was not cognitively impaired.) On 3/12/25, Surveyor reviewed the job description and responsibilities for Hospitality Aides provided by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A. Surveyor reviewed a Hospitality Aide document, signed by HA-D on 1/29/25, that indicated: To provide support and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R10) of 1 resident observed during the provision of cares. R10 had an indwelling catheter and was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). On 3/11/25, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E and CNA-F did not wear gowns while completing personal hygiene and catheter care for R10. In addition, Registered Nurse (RN)-G did not wear a gown or complete hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care for R10. Finding include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 2/5/25, indicates: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident cares .initiation of EBP: .i. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central lines, urinary catheters .) .Implementation of EBP: a. Make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician and Guardian were notified of medication refusals for 1 resident (R) (R3) of 11 sampled residents. R3 refused multiple medications in January and February of 2025. The facility did not notify R3's physician or Guardian. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 1/2024, indicates: .2. If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or given at other than the scheduled time .If two consecutive doses of a vital medication are withheld or refused, the physician is notified. On 2/12/25, Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), depression, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, personality disorder, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/24, had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident representative interview, and record review, the facility did not provide treatment and services to prevent weight loss and hydration for 2 residents (R) (R3 and R1) of 11 sampled residents. R3 had an order for a mechanical soft diet with ground meat. On 12/20/24, a swallow study and speech therapy evaluation was requested for a possible diet upgrade. On 12/30/24, Speech Therapy (ST) upgraded R3's diet, however, R3's diet order was not changed. As of 2/12/25, the swallow study was not completed. In addition, R3's meal intakes were not consistently documented. R1 was at risk for dehydration. Staff did not consistently document or monitor R1's fluid intake to determine if hydration interventions were effective. Findings include: The facility's Nutritional Management policy, dated 4/9/24, indicates: The facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status in the context of his or her overall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of 2 residents (R) (R5 and R6) of 4 sampled residents. R5 did not receive calcium 200 milligrams (mg) as ordered during the AM medication pass on 2/12/25. In addition, staff did not update R5's physician regarding the missed medication. R6 did not receive Seroquel XR 50 mg as ordered during the AM medication pass on 2/12/25. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration Policy, revised 11/12/24, indicates: .10. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed .b. Right drug .11. Review Medication Administration Record (MAR) to identify medication to be administered .22. If medication is unable to be administered due to the unavailability of the medication, notify the pharmacy to obtain alternative medication options, to include contingency availability, and consult with the physician . 1. On 2/12/25, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility did not allow 1 resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents to set up a petty cash fund or Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) account. R2's Corporate Guardian (CG)-H asked the facility to set up a resident account for R2. CG-H was told an account could not be set up and the facility could not cash checks for R2 unless CG-H provided direct deposit account information. Findings include: The facility's Resident Personal Funds policy, revised 7/4/24, indicates: .2) If the resident chooses to deposit personal funds with the facility, upon written authorization of a resident, the facility must act as a fiduciary of the resident's funds and hold, safeguard, manage, and account for the personal funds of the resident deposited with the facility. Deposit of Funds: .3) Residents whose care is funded by Medicaid; the facility will deposit the residents' personal funds in excess of $50 in an interest-bearing account separate from any of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure services were provided to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents. R1's plan of care did not contain interventions to address R1's contracted left hand. Findings include: On 11/22/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, amputation of right hand, and hemiplegia (paralysis/immobility of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (also known as stroke) affecting the left side. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/26/24, indicated R1 was rarely/never understood. R1's medical record indicated R1 had a Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) who was responsible for R1's healthcare decisions. On 11/22/24 at 9:11 AM, Surveyor observed R1 in bed. Surveyor noted R1 had a below-the-elbow amputation of the right arm and R1's left hand/fingers were contracted and contained a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not consistently monitor nutrition/hydration intake for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. R1 had orders for one-on-one feeding assistance and meal and fluid intake to be documented each meal. Staff did not consistently document those items. In addition, R1's care plan was not updated with an intervention for staff to offer and provide R1 water every hour. Findings include: On 11/22/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, amputation of right hand, and hemiplegia (paralysis/immobility of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (also known as stroke) affecting the left side. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/26/24, indicated R1 was rarely/never understood. R1's medical record indicated R1 had a Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) who was responsible for R1's healthcare decisions. R1's medical record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide appropriate medically-related social services for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. R1's hospital discharge summary indicated R1 had a history of a suicide attempt, was followed by a psychiatrist in the community, and had psychotropic medication discontinued while in the hospital prior to admission to the facility. The facility did not follow-up and assist R1 with the continuance of psychiatric services or attempt to expedite the guardianship process (example: request for emergency protective placement) in a timely manner when R1 left the facility multiple times and demonstrated unsafe behavior. Findings include: The facility's Elopements and Wandering Residents policy, with a revision date of 9/16/23, indicates: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented for 2 of 8 employees reviewed for background checks. The facility did not complete an out-of-state background check for Director of Nursing (DON)-B. The facility did not have a completed Background Information Disclosure (BID) form for Laundry Aide (LA)-C. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, with an implementation date of 9/18/23, indicates: Screening: A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credentials checks shall be conducted on potential new employees, contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic institutions, volunteers, and consultants .3. The facility will maintain documentation of proof that the screening occurred. On 8/20/24, Surveyor reviewed DON-B's background check information. DON-B was hired on 2/28/20. DON-B's four year BID form was completed on 1/5/24. DON-B checked Yes to question 4 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 (Human Resources (HR)-G and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F) of 3 staff reviewed for infection surveillance and 4 residents (R) (R13, R32, R23, and R189) of 14 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not complete details of a staff illness line list used for infection surveillance for HR-G and CNA-F. During an observation on 7/2/24, CNA-I did not perform appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of care for R13. During an observation on 7/2/24, R32's room contained used personal protective equipment (PPE). In addition, medical supplies were stored in R32's room. During an observation on 7/2/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-J did not sanitize a blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a self-administration of medication assessment was accurately completed for 1 resident (R) (R11) of 4 sampled residents. On 7/2/24, Surveyor observed medication at R11's bedside. A self-administration of medication assessment and physician's order did not accurately reflect the medications R11 was allowed to self-administer. In addition, R11's plan of care did not indicate how R11 would store and secure the medications kept in R11's room. Findings include: The facility's Resident Self-Administration of Medication policy, with copyright date of 2024, indicates: .14. The care plan must reflect resident self-administration and storage arrangements for such medications. On 7/2/24, Surveyor reviewed R11's medical record. R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and hypertension. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/26/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements were met for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 14 sampled residents. R7's PASRR Level I Screen was completed inaccurately, therefore, a PASRR Level II Screen was not completed. Findings include: The Department of Health Services (DHS) document titled Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screen (F-22191), with a revision date of 7/2017, indicates: Nursing facilities must not admit any new resident who is suspected of having a serious mental illness or a developmental disability unless the State mental health authority/State developmental disability authority or designee has evaluated the person and determined if the person needs nursing facility placement and if the person needs specialized services .If a Level II Screen is required, the information on the (Level I) form is matched with information from the person's Level II Screen to ensure the facility, the department's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans were implemented for 2 residents (R) (R7 and R15) of 14 sampled residents. On 7/2/24, Surveyor observed a bed rail on R7's bed. R7's care plan did not indicate the need for a bed rail. R15 had a history of being sexually assaulted. R15's care plan did not contain information related to R15's request for no caregivers of the opposite gender. Findings include: The facility's Proper Use of Bed Rails policy, with a copyright date 2023, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails .16. Responsibilities of ongoing monitoring and supervision are specified as follows: a. Direct care staff will be responsible for care and treatment in accordance with the plan of care. On 7/1/24, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure nail care was provided for 1 resident (R) (R21) of 14 sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Staff did not provide toenail clipping and cleaning for R21. Findings include: The facility's undated Nail Care Policy indicates: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health .2. Identify conditions that increase risk for foot or nail problems, such as diabetes .4. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule (such as weekly on Wednesday 3-11 shift or shower day). Nail care will be provided between scheduled occasions as the need arises .Principles of nail care: a. Nails should be kept smooth to avoid skin injury. On 7/2/24, Surveyor reviewed R21's medical record. R21 had diagnoses including fractured left pubis, emphysema, and asthma. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained accurate and complete documentation for 2 residents (R) (R7 and R10) of 14 sampled residents. On 7/2/24, Surveyor observed a bed rail on R7's bed. R7's care plan did not indicate the need for a bed rail and R7's medical record did not contain documentation of assessments staff indicated were completed. R10's cane was taken away by staff. R10's medical record did not contain documentation of a discussion with R10 regarding the removal and under what conditions R10 could have the cane returned. Findings include: 1. On 7/1/24, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and fibromyalgia. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/6/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated R7 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment did not indicate R7 used bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R1, R7, and R8) of 9 sampled residents had call lights within reach. R1, R7, and R8 were observed in their rooms without a call light within reach or a means to notify staff if assistance was needed. Findings include: On 6/3/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction with left sided paralysis, below elbow amputation of right arm, and anxiety disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/12/24, stated R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 12 out of 15 which indicated R1 had minimal cognitive impairment. R1's medical record indicated R1's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) was responsible for R1's healthcare decisions. R1's care plan included the intervention Place call light within reach with no specific instruction regarding what type of call light or placement was needed to accommodate R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 9 sampled residents. In addition, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the safe handling of drugs and biologicals for 1 (R9) of 11 residents observed during medication administration. R1 did not receive multiple doses of hydrocortisone (a steroid medication) as ordered by R1's physician. During medication pass on [DATE], Surveyor noted slot 2 of R9's second card of buspirone (used to treat anxiety) contained a half pill that was taped in the slot. In addition, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-C destroy a half tablet of buspirone by discarding it in the garbage. Findings include: The facility's undated Medication Administration policy indicates: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly document, investigate, or resolve grievances for 2 residents (R) (R5 and R6) of 6 residents. R5 reported Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C did not change R5's clothing from the day prior. The facility did not document, investigate, or thoroughly resolve the grievance. R6 reported that R6 was wet and CNA-C ignored R6. The facility did not document, investigate, or thoroughly resolve the grievance. Findings include: The facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy, dated 9/7/23, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal .Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgement of a complaint/grievance and actively working toward resolution of the complaint/grievance .10. B. The staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for 3 Residents (R) (R1, R2, and R4) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. R1 received scheduled medications outside of the facility's acceptable time frame on 9/23/23, 9/27/23, 10/2/23, 10/7/23, and 10/10/23. In addition, R1's Lidocaine Patch was not applied on 10/11/23. R2's 12:00 PM medication was administered at 1:08 PM on 10/11/23. R4's 12:00 PM medication was administered at 1:10 PM on 10/11/2. Findings include: The facility's undated Timely Administration of Medication policy indicated: To ensure timely ordering and administration of medication .compare the medications available to the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for each resident .time to be administered. The facility's Medication Administration policy, with a copyright date of 2023, indicated:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 35 of 36 residents residing in the facility (One resident received nutrition exclusively via tube feeding.) Staff did not test Quaternary sanitizing solution per manufacturer's instructions. Kitchen ceiling vents in the food preparation area contained visible dust. Cook (CK)-E did not wear a hairnet when CK-E entered the kitchen and began food preparation. The ice machine in the kitchen was not clean and contained a dusty filter. Findings include: Dietary Manager (DM)-D stated the facility followed the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code. 1. Sanitizing Solution Testing Quaternary test strips used by the facility contained a package insert that indicated the solution should be between 65 and 75 degrees Fahrenheit (F) at the time of testing. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 6/5/23 at 7:45 AM, DM-D stated staff used sanitizer buckets to clean kitchen prep and surface areas. DM-D also stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 10 Residents (R) (R37, R30, R33, R21, R2, R8, R29, R24, R27, and R25) of 18 sampled residents. During an observation in the main dining, Surveyor observed dead bugs in the ceiling lights, spiderwebs in the windowsills, stained and warped ceiling tiles and noted the condition of the walls needed repair. R33 stated the condition of the dining room prevented R33 from eating in the dining room for meals. During observations and resident interviews, Surveyor noted R37, R30, R33, R21, R2, R8, R29, R24, R27, and R25's rooms contained holes in the floor, cracked floor tiles, floors that were uneven and soft and/or stained ceiling tiles. R30, R21, and R25 stated the condition of their floors created difficulties with walking and room comfort. R25 and R33 stated the warped, brown and yellow stained ceiling tiles were not home-like. Findings include: 1. During an interview with R37 on 6/5/23 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor noted R37's floor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure privacy during pericare for 2 Residents (R11 and R24) of 16 residents reviewed. During an observation of pericare for R24, Surveyor observed a nurse open the door and enter the room on two occasions. On both occasions, the privacy curtain was open and R24 was exposed. While staff assisted R11 with bed pan use, Surveyor entered the room and noted the privacy curtain was open. Findings include: 1. R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction and dysphagia. R24 resided in double room with another resident. R24 had a care plan that indicated: (R24) presents with an alteration in ability to communicate related to impaired speech, impaired cognition. (R24) has problems with reception, transmission of information. (R24) can become frustrated when unable to convey (R24's) message. (R24) has a communication board/computer. On 6/6/23 at 11:19 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-M enter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the appropriate care and services were provided to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 Resident (R) (R27) of 16 residents reviewed. R27 had a leg brace to prevent contractures. The brace was not consistently offered or applied per R27's plan of care. Findings include: R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (stroke). R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/5/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out 15 which indicated R27 did not have cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated R27 had impairment on one side for upper and lower extremity range of motion. On 6/6/23, Surveyor reviewed R27's medical record which contained a care plan that indicated R27 had limited physical mobility related to contractures. The care plan contained the following approach: Apply brace to left leg Q (every) AM and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a Nursing Assistant (NA) completed a competency evaluation for 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed. CNA-H was employed by the facility as a CNA, but did not complete the Nurse Aide competency exam. Findings include: CNA-H was hired by the facility on 3/20/23 as a CNA. On 6/5/23, Surveyor requested background check and CNA registry information for CNA-H. On 6/6/23, Surveyor reviewed background check and Nurse Aide registry information for CNA-H. Surveyor reviewed a copy of CNA-H's Certificate of Successful Completion of Nurse Aide Program from (a local technical college), dated 10/11/22, but noted no Wisconsin Nurses Aide Registry information for CNA-H. Surveyor requested Wisconsin Nurses Aide Registry information for CNA-H from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A. On 6/6/23 at 3:59 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A who stated NHA-A was unaware that CNA-H was not on the Nurse Aide Registry until Surveyor asked for CNA-H's Nurses Aide Registry information. NHA-A stated CNA-H worked in the facility as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not administer medications timely for 3 Residents (R) (R16, R15, and R11) of 16 residents. R16, R15 and R11 did not receive their AM medications within the facility's AM medication pass time frame on 6/3/23. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, copyright 2023, contained the following information: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this State, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. 1. R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/1/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R16 was not cognitively impaired. On 6/5/23 at 9:08 AM, Surveyor interviewed R16 who stated R16 did not receive R16's AM medications until almost 12:00 PM over the weekend. R16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring of a high-risk medication for 1 Resident (R) (R191) of 16 residents reviewed. R191's medical record did not contain monitoring for side effects of oxycodone (an opioid medication). Findings include: The facility's Medication Monitoring policy, copyright 2023, contained the following information: This facility takes a collaborative, systematic approach to medication management, including the monitoring of medications for efficacy and adverse consequences .Adverse Consequences is a broad term referring to unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, such as impairment or decline in an individual's mental or physical condition or psychosocial status .6. Interventions shall be identified on the resident's comprehensive plan of care for the systematic monitoring of high-risk medication to facilitate early identification of adverse consequences. According to the Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses 18th edition copyright…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$18,819 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $8,968 — penalty dated 2024-07-03
  • $9,851 — penalty dated 2023-10-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burlington Health and Rehabilitation CenterBurlington, WI 1 of 5Lyonsview Health And Rehabilitation CenterKnoxville, TN 1 of 5Madison Health and Rehabilitation CenterMadison, WI 1 of 5Manahawkin Health And Rehabilitation CenterManahawkin, NJ 1 of 5Suring Health and Rehab CenterSuring, WI 1 of 5Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 2 of 5Avondale Health and Rehabilitation Center, LLCHumboldt, TN 2 of 5Beloit Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, WI 2 of 5Eastview Health and Rehabilitation CenterAntigo, WI 2 of 5Highlands Health And Rehabilitation CenterMemphis, TN 2 of 5Muskego Health and Rehabilitation CenterMuskego, WI 2 of 5North Ridge Health and Rehabilitation CenterManitowoc, WI 2 of 5Riverside Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCTrenton, NJ 2 of 5Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation CenterKenosha, WI 3 of 5Monroe Health And Rehabilitation CenterMadisonville, TN 3 of 5Patriot Health and Rehabilitation CenterParis, TN 4 of 5Dyersburg Health And Rehabilitation CenterDyersburg, TN 4 of 5Nu Roc Health and Rehabilitation CTRLaona, WI 4 of 5Okeena Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCDyersburg, TN 4 of 5St Ann Health and Rehabilitation CenterMilwaukee, WINot rated (Special Focus)Medical Suites at Oak Creek (The)Oak Creek, WI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RUVEL, MENACHEMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL48%since 06/01/2019
WEINBERG, YISROELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL48%since 06/01/2019
CHAMPION CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$660K
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 9%Other / private 43%

This home reported $660K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$323per resident / day
operating cost
$9,833per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525670. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next