Avondale Health and Rehabilitation Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 67.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) quick reference guide, policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify a pressure ulcer and obtain a physician's order for the treatment of the pressure ulcer before it deteriorated to a Stage 3 pressure ulcer for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The failure of the facility to perform a skin assessment, identify a pressure ulcer, and obtain a physician's order before the pressure ulcer progressed to a Stage 3 pressure ulcer resulted in actual Harm for Resident #1. The findings include: Review of the NPUAP quick reference guide, revised 4/13/16, defined a Stage 3 pressure ulcer as .Full thickness loss of skin .Slough and/or Eschar may be visible. The depth of tissue damage varies .Fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage and/or bone are not exposed . The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention and Non-Pressure Ulcer Management policy revised 5/2019 documented, .This…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 12/2/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse.Abuse means the willful infliction of.intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse.Alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff or resident.but has not yet been investigated.Mental Abuse includes but is not limited to humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment.The facility will have written procedures that include.Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the total number of staff, and actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care on the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing form for 31 of 31 sampled days. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time .will contain the following information .Facility name .total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift .Registered Nurses(RNs) .Licensed Practical Nurses(LPNs) .Certified Nurse Aides(CNAs) . 2. Review of the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing forms dated 12/2/2024 thru 1/2/2025, revealed there were no total number of RN's, LPN's, and CNA's and no total of the actual hours worked by the RNs, LPNs, and CNAs. During an interview 1/9/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on job description review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a full-time or part-time Registered Dietitian (RD), or a qualified Dietary Manager (DM) was employed to provide oversight of the kitchen, kitchen staff competencies, residents' prescribed diets, and meals served in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect 55 of 55 residents who received a tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of a Registered Dietitian job description revealed .Major Duties and Responsibilities .Provides registered dietitian services in one or more sites according to policies and procedures, and federal and state requirements. Plans, organizes, develops, and directs the nutritional care of the resident in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations. Assesses/Monitors the residents' nutritional status and provides recommendations to clinical/medical staff. Develop and updates nutritional care plans as needed. Observes resident meal service to ensure diets are correct and modifications are followed. Educates residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, document review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for 4 of 4 staff members (Dietary [NAME] C, D, F, and Dietary Supervisor) working in the kitchen. The facility had a census of 55, with 55 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process .This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of the food to the resident. Elements of the process include .Distribution and service of food to the resident, including transportation, set up, and assistance .Employee hygienic practices .Facility staff shall inspect all food, food products, and beverages for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely storage .Labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, handled, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions when for 2 of 4 (Dietary [NAME] C and Dietary [NAME] D) dietary staff failed to perform hand hygiene, and when 1 of 4 (Dietary [NAME] D) failed to test the sanitation of the 3 compartment sink prior to use, when unlabeled, undated, and expired foods were stored in the kitchen. The facility had a census of 55 with 55 of those residents receiving a tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process .Employee hygienic practices .Facility staff shall inspect all food, food products, and beverages for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely storage .Labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including but not limited to left overs, so its used by its use by date, or frozen (where applicable) and discarded .Staff shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during medication administration when 1 of 4 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN G)) staff were observed during medication administration, when 1 of 1 (LPN A) LPN failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions when administering PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube medications, during dining when the facility failed to follow transmission based precautions for 1 of 1 (Resident #159) reviewed for isolation, and when a random observation revealed LPN H failed to perform proper hand hygiene and failed to clean reusable medical equipment. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Isolation Precautions, revealed .The dietary department should be notified by nursing or other designated person that the precautions are needed, the notification should include the residents name, room number and any other pertinent information . Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a person-centered care plan for 1 of 15 (Resident #25) residents reviewed for weight gain and weight loss. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive care plan will describe .The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Failure to Thrive, Diabetes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician orders for 2 of 15 (Resident #31 and Resident #159) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Consulting Physician/Practitioner Orders, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .Consulting physician/practitioner orders are those orders provided to the facility by a physician/practitioner other than the resident's attending physician or physician/practitioner who is acting on behalf of the attending physician. A consulting physician/practitioner may include, but not limited to a resident's .Nurse practitioner .For consulting physician/practitioner orders received via telephone, the nurse will .Document the order on the physician order form, notating the time, date, name, title of the person providing the order, and signature and title of the person receiving the order. Call the attending physician to verify the order. Document the verification of the order by entering the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity for 1 of 3 (Resident #13) residents reviewed for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Depression, Anxiety, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), and Disorder of Bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, that indicated the resident was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for activities of daily living, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and diagnoses of UTI, MS, and the use of an antibiotic. Review of the Care plan dated 12/20/2024, revealed .has an Indwelling Catheter .Bladder disorder and MS . Review of a Physician Order dated 12/29/2024, revealed .Privacy bag in place for dignity every shift . Observations in Resident #13's room on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care to ensure that acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for 1 of 15 (Resident #25) reviewed for weight gain and loss. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Nutritional Management, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .Weight related interventions .Monitoring/Revision .The care plan will be updated as needed, such as when a resident's condition changes, goals are met or the resident changes his or her goals, interventions are determined to be ineffective, or as new causes of nutrition-related problems are identified .The physician will be notified of significant changes in weight, intake or nutritional status . Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, dated 12/1/2024, revealed .Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight range and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN