St Ann Health and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 45.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that quarterly safety evaluations accurately identified and documented the use of elopement-prevention devices, that care plans were developed for residents utilizing wander guards, and that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments reflected the presence of these safety devices for three of three residents (Resident (R)3, R8, and R45) reviewed for elopement. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not recognize wander guards as a safety device to ensure all needed interventions were implemented.re respiratory equipment was stored in a sanitary manner for one of one resident (Resident (R) 15) reviewed for respiratory care out of a total sample of 17. This had the potential to expose the resident to infection. Findings include:1. Review of R3's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 05/07/25 with medical diagnoses including vascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was transferred in a dignified manner for one resident (Resident (R) 24) out of a total of 17 sampled residents reviewed. This failure has the potential to negatively impact a resident's dignity and psychological well-being. Findings include:Review of R24's Face Sheet, located in the Profile tab of electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of legal blindness, mild cognitive impairment, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and need assistance with personal care. Review of R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the MDS tab of the EMR and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/04/26, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15, which indicated R24 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated R24 ambulated with a wheelchair, and she was dependent on staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual review, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents (Resident (R) 3, R8, and R45) reviewed for wander guard placement had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Failure to code the MDS correctly can lead to inaccurate federal reimbursement and inaccurate assessment and care planning for the residents.Findings include: 1. Review of R3's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 05/07/25 with medical diagnoses including vascular dementia with severe anxiety and major depressive disorder.Review of the physician's orders for R3, located in the EMR under the Orders tab, documented an order on 05/13/25, Wander Guard to Right Ankle. Check function daily. Update nurse if any malfunction.Review of R3's quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/31/25, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, lacked documentation of the presence of a wander/elopement alarm.An observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for one of three residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for wander guard placement to prevent elopement. This deficient practice increases the risk of inconsistent staff responses and elopement.Findings include:Review of R3's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 05/07/25 with medical diagnoses including vascular dementia with severe anxiety and major depressive disorder.Review of the Elopement assessment dated [DATE], located under the Evaluations tab in the EMR, documented R3 was a high risk for elopement.Review of the physician's orders for R3, located in the EMR under the Orders tab, documented an order on 05/13/25, Wander Guard to Right Ankle. Check function daily. Update nurse if any malfunction.Review of R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in a sanitary manner for one of one resident (Resident (R) 15) reviewed for respiratory care out of a total sample of 17. This had the potential to expose the resident to infection. Findings include:Review of R15's Face Sheet, located in the Profile tab of electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant neoplasm of unspecified right bronchus or lung, and acquired absence of lung. Review of R15's Care Plan Report, located in the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed a focus, revised on 04/04/25, which indicated R15 had PRN (as needed) oxygen therapy due to end of life and lung cancer. A focus, revised on 04/17/25, indicated R15 had altered respiratory status or difficulty breathing due to lung cancer and COPD. Review of R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the MDS tab of the EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that resident (Resident (R)13) received medications in the correct dosage and as ordered. This resulted in two medication errors out of 32 opportunities, yielding a medication error rate of 6.25%. These errors had the potential to reduce the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment due to underdosing.Findings include:1. Review of R13's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 08/26/22 and readmission date of 09/12/25 with medical diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and chronic (diastolic) congestive heart failure (CHF).Review of R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, under the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/11/25, revealed R13 used antidepressant and diuretic medications, and review of her drug regimen revealed no significant issues.Review of the March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR), located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure each resident is treated with dignity and respect that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. This occurred for 2 (R1 and R2) of 3 Residents reviewed for dignity.*On 2/11/26, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) C and D standing, while feeding R1 and R2 their meals. CNA-C was also observed feeding two residents interchangeably at the same time. Findings Include:The facility Meal Supervision and Assistance reviewed/revised 10/29/24 documents:Guideline:.The resident will be prepared for a well-balanced meal in a calm environment, location of his/her preference and with adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, provide adequate nutrition, and assure an enjoyable event. This includes:1.Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s)2.Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s)3.Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s)4.Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure known resident behaviors of kicking, hitting, grabbing, rejection of care, et cetera (etc., other similar things) were addressed, to include the development and implementation of interventions, for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for behaviors. Findings included:An admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted Resident #2 on 04/09/2024 and most recently admitted the resident on 10/31/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of encephalopathy (disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected); epilepsy (seizure disorder); hemiplegia (complete paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side; unspecified dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance anxiety disorder; insomnia; and need for assistance with personal care. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 46 of 48 residents that receive food from the kitchen. * In the facility's main kitchen, observations of partially used and undated food were made in the walk-in and wall freezers/coolers. Several food items were observed in one of the facility's main kitchen wall coolers uncovered open to air and undated. * [NAME] restraints were not being utilized by a kitchen staff working in the main kitchen area. * Temperatures were not completed on all required food items prior to serving the food to residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Food Safety Requirements, date reviewed 04/29/2024 documents: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Facility staff shall inspect all food, food products, and beverages for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely and proper storage. Subsection iv. Labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including, but not limited to leftovers, so it is used by its…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain 1 (R14) of 12 residents reviewed their right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. * R14's protected health information was left on a computer screen unattended in a common area. R14's medication administration record was displayed on the computer screen in full view of residents and staff that were in and around the common area. Findings include: 1.) R14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Depression and Alzheimer's Disease. R14's Quarterly Minimum Daily Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 12/4/24, documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating that R14 has moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG documents that R14 uses wheelchair for mobility. On 02/05/25, at 09:28 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-D passing medication from the medication cart. RN-D was observed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $684K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI