Beloit Health And Rehabilitation Center
1905 W Hart Rd, Beloit, WI 53511 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (608) 365-2554 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $46,542 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.5% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.8% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.2% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 16.9% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.3% | 24.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.8% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.0% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.3% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.6% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.0%CMS range 48.1–71.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.9–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 74.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 5.6–15.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 65.1 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for significant medication errors. R57 did not receive scheduled insulin at 8:00AM on 7/24/24 and did not have blood glucose monitoring in place. R57 was hospitalized on the evening of 7/24/24 with acute hyperglycemia (a medical emergency that occurs when blood sugar levels are extremely high) requiring treatment with insulin drip (administration of insulin through intravenous line.) Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled Medication Administration, dated 05/2024, states in part: Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice . 20. Sign MAR (Medication Administration Record) after administered . R57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (a condition that occurs when the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they followed their Antibiotic Stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 2 of 6 sampled residents (R16 and R34) and 1 supplemental resident (R612) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. R16 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R34 and R612 are being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). The facility did not follow Standards of Practice for Antibiotic Stewardship: R16 has a history of antibiotic resistance and was prescribed antibiotics without meeting criteria. R16 was prescribed antibiotics for five events between March 26, 2024 and July 5, 2024, for asymptomatic bacteremia (presence of bacteria that does not cause symptoms thus not requiring antibiotic treatment). The facility did not thoroughly review R16's urine culture and sensitivities, and therefore, did not recognize R16 had developed resistance to a prescribed antibiotic. R34 was prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately consult with a resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 1 of 7 residents (R63) that resulted in actual harmy, and 1 of 7 residents (R61) that had potential for minimal harm. The facility did not consult with R63's Medical Doctor (MD) per Physician Orders and as her condition changed resulting in actual harm when R63 was hospitalized and aggressive diuresis. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Notifications of Change, date implemented 12/2022, states in part .the purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification . the facility must inform the resident, consult with the residence physician and or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification: circumstances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not offer and/or administer the influenza immunization to each resident, and the resident's medical record does not include documentation the resident either received, refused, or was educated on the risks and benefits of the influenza and immunization for 1 of 6 (R64) residents reviewed for immunizations that resulted in actual harm, and 2 of 6 residents (R34 and R27) reviewed for immunizations that resulted in the potential for harm. R64 consented to have the influenza immunization upon admission to the facility. R64 did not receive the immunization and then contracted Influenza A which resulted in a complex hospitalization. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Influenza Vaccination dated 12/2022, states in part: Policy: it is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza by offering our residents, staff members, and volunteer workers annual immunization against influenza.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents who reside at the facility. Surveyor observed staff in the kitchen not wearing hair restraints. Cook E touched ready to eat food with contaminated gloves. CNA M did not wash or sanitize her hands after assisting one resident and before assisting another resident with their meal. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Food Safety Requirements, dated 10/2022.states, in part;.1. Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of the food to the resident. Elements of the process including the following.f. Employee hygienic practices.7. Staff shall adhere to safe hygienic practices to prevent contamination of foods from hands or physical objects.a. Staff shall wash hands according…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents who reside at the facility.Garbage was found outside the dumpsters at the facility. Evidenced by:The facility policy, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, revised on 3/2025.states, in part.The facility shall properly dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse.8. Dumpsters shall be emptied according to the facility contract. Garbage should not accumulate or be left outside the dumpster.On 1/27/26 at 9:44 AM, during the initial walk through of the kitchen, Surveyor observed garbage on the ground next to the facility dumpsters. Surveyor observed cardboard, food wrappers, and used gloves on the ground. Dietary Manager D (DM) indicated garbage should not be left on the ground. DM D indicated everyone is responsible for picking up garbage.On 1/28/26 at 1:10 PM, Nursing Home Administrator A (NHA) indicated garbage should be picked up and put in the dumpster. NHA A indicated understanding of the above concern.The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 4 residents (R12) received the necessary services for acceptable nutrition.R12 triggered for significant weight change with a weight loss of 7.4% in the last thirty days. The Registered Dietician recommended a scheduled snack of choice at HS (bedtime) on 1/20/26. The order was not started until 1/28/26.Evidenced by:The facility policy, Nutritional Management, revised on 4/2024, states, in part;.The facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status in the context of his or her overall condition.A systematic approach is used to optimize each resident's nutritional status:.c. Developing and consistently implementing pertinent approaches.R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including cancer, bipolar disorder, and panic disorder.R12's most recent care plan, states, in part;.The resident has nutritional problems or potential nutritional problems…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Physician progress notes were maintained in a physical chart or Electronic Health Record (EHR) for 1 of 3 supplemental residents reviewed (R61).R61 reported that they would like to schedule an appointment with their doctor; Surveyor was unable to locate documentation of physician visits in their physical chart or EHR.Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation last reviewed on 10/16/24 states in part .1. The Licensed Nurse, Medical Records, or Facility Designee should: .f. Remind the physician to date and sign all orders and write a progress note.h. Ensure a progress note is present to reflect the date and time of the physician visit, an indication as to whether new orders were written or no new orders were received and any special discussions between the resident and/or family and physician during the visit.2. The Physician should: .d. Date, write and sign a progress note for each visit. R61 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure each resident receives food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 4 Residents (R40 ) reviewed for nutrition.R40 has an order for ground meat and received general texture meats.Evidenced by:The facility's Therapeutic Diet Orders policy, dated 3/26/25, states, in part: The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician. Definitions: Mechanically Altered Diet is one in which the texture or consistency of food is altered to facilitate oral intake. Examples include soft solids, pureed foods, ground meat, and thickened liquids. Therapeutic Diet is a diet ordered by a physician.as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition. Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .2. Therapeutic diets, including mechanically altered diets where appropriate, will be based on the resident's individual [NAME] as determined by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement an established process of assessing a resident's cognitive ability to understand an arbitration agreement before obtaining a signature for residents; and did not ensure the staff responsible for the arbitration agreement was able to thoroughly explain the agreement for complete understanding. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 1 of 3 sampled residents (R44) RR J (R44's Resident Representative and Power of Attorney (POA)) and RR K voiced concerns of having signed an arbitration agreement while filling out admission paperwork and not fully understanding what she had signed. RR K indicated the arbitration agreement was not explained to her fully and she would not have wanted to sign that if she knew she was signing away constitutional rights to use the judicial system to resolve disputes with the facility. Evidenced by:Facility policy, titled Binding Arbitration Agreement, dated 12/1/24, includes: The facility asks all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promptly notify and consult with a physician when a resident missed their medications for 1 of 1 resident's (R2) reviewed for medication administration. R2's physician was not notified when R2 did not receive antipsychotic medication over several days. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Notification of Changes, dated 10/24/23, includes the following: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. The facility's policy titled Medication Error Reporting and Counseling Procedure, dated 12/12/23, includes the following: Notifying the Provider(s): The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents/choice for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for non-pressure wounds. R1 had dates his wound care was not signed out in the TAR (Treatment Administration Record). R1 returned from the hospital and did not have a full assessment completed for his non-pressure wounds. This is evidenced by: The Facilities Policy and Procedure entitled Wound Treatment Management dated 2/14/23 documents in part: .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders .7. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. 8. The effectiveness of treatments will be monitored through ongoing assessment of the wound . R1 is a long-term resident of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries (PI) for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility did not complete wound care as ordered for R2. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Wound Treatment Management, dated 2/14/23, includes: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/31/25. R2's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for December 2024 includes the following: Sacrum wound;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident's (R2) reviewed for smoking/vaping. The facility failed to re-assess and update R2's care plan for safety after being observed vaping in the facility. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Smoking, dated 7/10/25, includes the following: It is the guideline of this facility to provide a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors, and employees, including safety as related to smoking. Safety protections apply to smoking and non-smoking residents. Smoking is prohibited in all areas except the designated smoking area. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes/vape/vapor pen) can catch on fire and/or explode if not handled and stored safely. Safety measures for the use of electronic cigarettes by residents will include but are not limited to: Use of e-cigarettes in designated smoking areas only. A safe smoking assessment will be completed on all residents using e-cigarettes. Any resident who is deemed safe to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident's (R2) reviewed for medications. The facility did not ensure R2 was provided his Seroquel (Antipsychotic medications) for several days. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Medication Error Reporting and Counseling Procedure, dated 12/12/23, includes the following: Medication errors .should be reviewed for the potential of a negative outcome. When a medication error occurs, the licensed nurse/employee needs to be able to report the error .to Nursing Management. The facility should consider reporting the error to their contracted pharmacy provider for any desired information or needed follow-up. A prompt assessment of the resident(s) involved to be completed to determine harm or the potential risks to the resident. Three general guidelines in determining whether a medication error is significant or not: resident condition, drug category and frequency of error.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received meals at their desired time in accordance with resident needs, preferences, or requests. This has the potential to affect all 58 residents residing at the facility. Residents (R8, R41, and R35) voiced concern regarding meals being served over an hour after the scheduled time. Surveyors observed meals being served 1-1.5 hours after the scheduled mealtimes. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Frequency of Meals, dated, 7/17, states, in part: .The following mealtimes have been established by our facility for residents, Breakfast 7:45AM, Lunch 11:45AM, Dinner 4:45PM . Example 1: R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/14/24 indicated R8 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 indicating R8 is cognitively intact. R8 is own person. On 9/10/24 at 8:28AM, R8 indicated meals are often served over an hour after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate reporting of the mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS.) This has the potential to affect all 58 residents residing within the facility. The facility failed to enter accurate data in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) reporting and triggered for five fiscal year quarters, dated 4/1/23 - 6/30/24, for inadequate weekend staffing. This is evidenced by: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, states in part: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections such as COVID-19. This has the potential to affect the census of 58 residents (R). The facility infection prevention and control policies have not been updated annually. The facility did not ensure contact tracing and testing was completed accurately and timely during a COVID outbreak. Surveyor observed cares for R35 with breaches in infection control technique. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 5/16/23, states, in part: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per acted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 of 3 sampled Residents (R35, R52, & R15) and 1 of 1 supplemental (R49). R35 and R49's floor in their room had not been cleaned and had visible dirt on the floor. R15's room was not homelike with visible repairs needed. R52 voiced concern that R52 is unable to use closet in bedroom because of roommate thinking R52 is stealing clothes. R52 voiced concern that her dresser is broken as well. R52 indicated she has to keep all of her clothes and items in boxes in R52's room. Surveyor observed R52 to have boxes stacked up in her room. This is evidenced by: Facility Policy entitled 'Routine Cleaning and Disinfection,' dated 8/2022, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 24 total sampled Residents (R48, R38, R15 & R16). R48 did not receive her showers twice a week every week. R38 did not receive the appropriate oral hygiene care recommended by the dentist. R15 did not receive oral hygiene daily R16's nails were visibly long and staff did not assist R16 in trimming them. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Oral care,' dated 8/22, states in part: Policy: It is the practice of this facility to provide oral care to residents in order to prevent and control plaque- associated oral diseases. Equipment and supplies. soft- bristle tooth brush, toothpaste; tongue depressor; penlight; mouthwash (optional); dental floss; emesis basin; glass of cool water; face towel; gloves. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: .4. Apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example: 2 R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include in part: polyosteoarthritis (arthritis where at least 5 joints are affected), Polyneuropathy, Lymphedema (A buildup of lymph fluid that causes swelling), Difficulty in walking, and Low back pain. R23's chart indicates she is her own decision maker. R23's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care Plan, with a revision date of 5/2/23, indicates R23 requires staff intervention to complete ADL's. Interventions include, in part: .Hoyer (full body lift) sling with hole cut out for bed side commode toileting needs. On 9/9/24 at 3:00PM Surveyor interviewed R23 who indicated about once a month she waits an hour to get assistance with toileting. R23 indicated that a month ago she was sitting on the bedpan or the commode, could not recall which for certain, and after an hour called the front desk 3 to 4 times and no one came so she called the police. The police did not come as someone came to help her then and she called to tell them she received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were documented and thoroughly resolved for 1 of 24 sampled residents (R23). R23 reported a grievance regarding her Hoyer (full body lift) transfers, and this was not documented or thoroughly resolved. R23 reported a grievance regarding an interaction with a staff member and this was not documented or thoroughly resolved. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Grievance Guideline, revised on 5/31/23, indicates, in part: Purpose: To provide a process to voice grievances (such as those about treatment, care .or violation of rights) and respond with prompt efforts to resolve while keeping the resident and/or representative appropriately apprised of progress toward resolution . Guideline: .Filing a Grievance .A grievance or concern may be expressed orally or in writing to the Grievance Officer or facility staff .Grievances may be given to any staff member who will forward the grievance to the Grievance Officer, or they may file…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that information from the baseline care plan was reviewed with the resident/resident representative and a copy of or summary of the care plan was provided to the resident/resident representative within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 residents (R27) reviewed for baseline care plan out of a sample of 24 residents. R27 did not have a baseline care plan review within 48 hours of admission. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Baseline Care Plan dated February 2023, states, in part: .The baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission.A written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and representative . R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include anoxic brain damage and personal history of traumatic brain injury. R27's Care Conference Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) note dated 6/18/24, states met with guardian. Discussed plan of care and discharge goals.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 (R54) residents reviewed for person-centered care plans out of 24 total sampled residents. R54's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan was reviewed by Surveyor. The care plan does not contain R54's individualized preferences in regard to her left arm. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, implemented 1/2024, indicates, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. .Definitions: Person-centered care means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident (R), or their representative had the right to participate in the care planning process for 2 of 24 total sampled Residents (R48 & R14). R48 indicated she does not have quarterly care plan meetings to discuss her care. R14's care plan was not revised to address her change in code status. This is evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Comprehensive Care Plans,' dated 8/22, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 21 residents (R45) reviewed for orders out of a total sample of 24. R45 received orders and those orders were not transcribed for two (2) days. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Medication Orders dated 4/16/24, documents the following in part: .a. Handwritten Order Signed by the Physician- The charge nurse on duty at the time the order is received should note the order and enter it on the physician order sheet or electronic order format, if not written by the physician . R45's wound documentation shows that R45's right heel wound was healed on 6/21/24 with placement of graft. Documentation from R45's Physician dated 6/26/24 includes the following orders: 1) Ensure 1 bottle 2x (2 times) a day in-between meal 2) Daily dressing change of pressure ulcer of right foot 3) General surgery for debridement of the thumb of left hand 4) Keflex 500mg (milligrams) 1 cap (capsule) q (every) 8 hours x (times) 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new injuries from developing for 3 of 5 (R34, R45 and R14) residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of a total sample of 24. R34 did not have his wound treatments completed as ordered. R45 did have her wound treatments completed as ordered. R14 did not have wound treatments completed as ordered. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Wound Treatment Management dated 2/14/23, documents in part: .1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change .7. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. Example 1 R34 has the following diagnoses: paraplegia complete, chronic pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure each residents environment was free of accidents and hazards for 3 of 24 total sampled Residents (R48, R34 and R52.) R48 indicated she smokes. R48 did not have a smoking assessment or care plan completed for smoking even though nursing staff were aware that she smoked occasionally. R34's electric wheelchair was charging in his room. R52 indicated she would use her electric scooter and go out in the community on her own. Therapy did not complete an assessment for safe operation of electrical wheelchairs/scooters until after R52 went out in community by herself. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Smoking Policy,' (no date), states in part: when the resident requests to smoke, the interdisciplinary team will assess the resident capabilities and deficits to determine appropriate supervision and assistance. Smoking will only be allowed in designated (outdoor) area(s) in the facility that are not near flammable substances or where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 Supplemental Resident (R32). On 9/10/24 R32 had a lidocaine patch still on her arm that was not removed the night before. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/24, states in part: .medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so . Procedures: Medication Preparation: .3.Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the medication administration record. Compare the medication and dosage schedule on the Resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record) with the medication label. If the label and MAR are different, and the container is not flagged indicating a change in directions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 3 errors out of 28 opportunities that affected 2 out of 4 supplemental residents (R32 & R31) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 10.71%. RN H (Registered Nurse) did not give R31 the correct dosing of his Sevelamer (phosphate binder to prevent low levels of calcium) LPN I (Licensed Practical Nurse) omitted R32's lidocaine patch and dispensed R463s medication into R32's medication cup. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/24, states in part: .medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so . Procedures: Medication Preparation: .3. Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the medication administration record. Compare the medication and dosage schedule on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure drugs and biological's are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 Medication carts and 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. Medication room had 5 bottles of expired liquid Tylenol on the shelf. Medication room fridge had an undated open insulin vial for R57. Needlepoint medication cart had three bottles of artificial tears that did not have the residents full name or date opened on them. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/24, states in part: . Medication administration: 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . 8. Check expiration date on package/container. No expired medications will be administered to a resident.b. The nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication if one is not provided by the dispensing pharmacy and enter the date opened. c. Certain products or package types such as multi-dose vials and ophthalmic drops have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents receive food at a palatable temperature for 1 of 1 sampled (R467) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R41) and 1 of 1 test trays. Residents R467 and R41 voiced concerns with receiving hot foods cold. Test tray was observed to have hot foods served cold and food not palatable. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Record of Food Temperatures, dated 3/24, states, in part; .It is the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperatures before trays are assembled .11. No food will be served that does not meet the food code standard temperatures . Example 1 R467 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential Hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease. On 9/9/24 at 11:16 AM Surveyor interviewed R467 and asked about the food. R467 stated the food is cold. Example 2 R41 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored or labeled in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 medication room refrigerators. Three cartons of thickened liquids and two half gallons of chocolate milk were opened and expired in the medication room refrigerator. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Food Safety Requirements,' states in part: .Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: .3. Facility staff shall inspect all food, food products, and beverages for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely and proper storage.c. Refrigerated storage - foods that require refrigeration shall be refrigerated immediately upon receipt or placed in freezer, whichever is applicable. Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage include: .iv. Labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including but not limited to leftovers, so it is used by its use-by date, or frozen . On 9/9/24 at 3:20 PM, Surveyor observed the medication room refrigerator and found the following: One Ready care thickened apple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was provided according to professional standards for one resident (R) out of nine sampled (R4). Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician insulin orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) and document the rationale for not administering the insulin. This failure had the potential to cause R4 not to receive the necessary care for treatment of R4's diabetes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Timely Administration of Insulin dated 4/23/23 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide timely administration of insulin in order to meet the needs of each resident and to prevent adverse effects on a resident's condition . and .All insulin will be administered in accordance with physician's orders . Review of R4's undated admission Record, located in the Resident Documents tab of the EMR, revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents receive and consume foods in the appropriate therapeutic diet for 1 (R4) of 3 residents sampled for altered special diets out of 4 total sampled residents. R4 did not receive a controlled carbohydrate diet as ordered by her physician. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Food and Nutrition Services, undated, states in part: . 1. The multidisciplinary staff, including nursing staff, the attending physician and the dietitian will assess each resident's nutritional needs, food likes, dislikes and eating habits, as well as physical, functional, and psychosocial factors that affect eating and nutritional intake and utilization. 2. A resident-centered diet and nutrition plan will be based on this assessment . 7. Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the food was stored, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 52 residents residing at the facility. Surveyor observed: -facility staff personal items in food preparation workstations -dirty floors in the dry storage, walk-in cooler, and walk-in freezer -dirty hood vent -undated and uncovered foods and beverages -milk served that were not on ice and not within safe zone -wet stacking Findings include: Example 1: Personal items On 6/12/23 at 10:38 AM, Surveyor observed two cell phones and a plastic container with food on the food prep workstations. Surveyor asked DS V (Dietary Staff) what was in the plastic container with food, DS V stated, that's someone's lunch, a co-worker's lunch. Surveyor asked DM D (Dietary Manager) if staff food or cell phones should be on the food prep workstations, DM D stated, no, they should not be. On 6/14/23 at 11:27 AM, Surveyor observed a drink and doughnut sitting on the food prep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect the census of 52 residents. The duct work over the top of a folding table was observed to be leaking onto the table while the laundry aide was folding clean linens on the table. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Laundry, dated 12/22, states in part: . Policy: The facility launders linens and clothing in accordance with current CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines to prevent transmission of pathogens . The facility policy, entitled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 6/16/23, states, in part: . Policy: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use was in place for 1 of 21 residents (R47) and 4 of 5 supplemental residents (R14, R28, R26, & R19). R47 was treated with antibiotics for a urinalysis culture and sensitivity (UA & C/S) that was not susceptible to the bacteria. R14 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S without documentation of a sensitivity report. R28 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S without meeting McGeers criteria. R28 had no signs and symptoms (s/sx.) of a urinary tract infection (UTI). R26 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S that was not susceptible to the bacteria. R19 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S without documentation of a sensitivity report. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated 12/22, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 2 of 2 residents (R53 and R65) of the total sample of 21 residents observed. R53 was observed to have an analgesic ointment cream in his room on his bedside table. R65 had medications located at the bedside. R65 did not have an order to self-administer medications. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 12/22, states in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely . 4. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form, which is placed in the resident's medical record. 5. Upon notification of the use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement their written policy which includes completing background checks for 3 of 8 employees. The facility did not implement their written policy which includes completing reference checks for 8 of 8 employees reviewed. CNA P (Certified Nursing Assistant), CNA S, and Dietary Aide V's personnel files did not contain Background Information Disclosure (BID) checks and reference checks. CNA O, CNA Q, CNA R, RN T (Registered Nurse), and LPN U's (Licensed Practical Nurse) personnel file did not contain reference checks. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Background Investigation, dated 12/22, states, in part; Policy: Job reference checks, drug screenings, licensure verifications and criminal conviction record checks are conducted on all personnel making application for employment with this company Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Human Resource department will conduct all applicable background investigation(s) on each individual making application for employment with this company and on any current employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an alleged violation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 21 sampled residents (R38). R38 alleged he was told by a staff member you can get fd and the facility did not report this to the State Survey Agency. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 12/22, states in part: .VII. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: Reporting of all alleged violation to the Administrator, state agency . within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury . R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease of inadequate control of blood levels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 1 of 21 sampled residents (R38). R38 alleged he was told by a staff member you can get fd and the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation into this allegation. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 12/22, states in part: . V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation; . 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and other who might have knowledge of the allegations; 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene, this has the affected 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for activities of daily living out of a total sample of 21. R1 was noted to have chin hairs that were approximately 1/4- 1/2 long. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated 12/2022, states in part: .Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has diagnoses that include: cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents out of a sample of 21 residents (R66) resulting in R66 in missing dialysis. R66 missed dialysis on 6/10/23 due to the facility not ensuring the transport service provider was available to transport R66 to scheduled dialysis appointment. According to <Gray, K. P., [NAME], D., & [NAME], S. M. (2017). In-center hemodialysis absenteeism: prevalence and association with outcomes.>Clinic Economics and Outcomes Research, Volume 9, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s136577 One absence due to a non-medical reason is associated with a 40 percent greater risk of hospitalization and a more than double risk of mortality in the subsequent 30 days. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Hemodialysis, dated 12/2022, states: This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medication error rates are not 5% or greater during medication administration. This affected 1 of 6 residents (R4) observed for medication pass. The facility medication error rate was 6.67%, for 2 errors out of 30 opportunities. R4's first medication error was administered 30 minutes late making this a timing error. The second medication error was administered without a complete physician order. The order was not found on the current Medication Administration Record (MAR) and was signed as administered under a different medication order that had been discontinued. This is evidenced by: Example 1 The facility's policy titled Medication Administration, dated 12/22, states in part: . 11. Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify resident name, mediation name, form, dose, route, and time . b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-29 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not include accurate potential financial liability to residents whose Medicare coverage was ending when issuing the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (R43, R54, and R72).R43 was receiving Medicare A benefits. R43 was not provided accurate potential financial liability when the SNFABN was issued.R54 was receiving Medicare A benefits. R54 was not provided accurate potential financial liability when the SNFABN was issued.R72 was receiving Medicare A benefits. R72 was not provided accurate potential financial liability when the SNFABN was issued.Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Policy and Procedure: Advanced Beneficiary Notice dated 2/1/22 states in part .2. When determined that services are no longer necessary a. Social Services or Social Services back up i. The social services representative will issue Room and Board ABNs per policy and upload this information into [facility's computer system] under the miscellaneous tab.c. Business office Manager i. Will provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$46,542 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $46,542 — penalty dated 2024-09-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CHAMPION CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAY AT BELOIT HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/01/2022 |
| RUVEL, MENACHEM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| WEINBERG, YISROEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525273. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.