Residence At Salem Woods

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to obtain a resident's weight upon admission to the facility. This affected one (#16) resident of the three residents reviewed for weight changes. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/15/25 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM), dysphagia, and acute kidney failure. Review of the care plan for Resident #16 dated 03/15/25 revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in nutrition and hydration and weight loss related to acute kidney failure, hydronephrosis, DM, fatty liver, anemia and poor intakes. Interventions to prevent weight loss included the following: assist/feed meals, monitor laboratory findings as ordered, speech referral as needed, provide supplements as ordered. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #16 dated 04/24/25 revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required maximum assistance from the staff with eating. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), the facility failed to ensure resident pain was effectively managed during a dressing change. This affected one (Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 04/01/11 with diagnoses including diabetes, profound intellectual disabilities, anxiety disorder, and aphasia. Review of the care plan for Resident #6 dated 12/28/11 revealed the resident was unable to verbally express pain. Goals of Resident #16's care plan were to decrease the resident's pain to an acceptable level to allow the resident's participation in treatments and activities of daily living (ADLs) and signs of discomfort would be reduced or resolved. Interventions included the following: administer medications as ordered, medications as ordered to manage pain, monitor effectiveness of interventions,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of medication insert, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated after opening and were not expired. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 1:42 P.M. of the medication storage room revealed two 16-ounce bottles of liquid Docusate Sodium Stool Softener with an expiration date of 09/2020. Interview on [DATE] at 1:43 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse #36 confirmed the expiration date on the two Docusate Sodium Stool Softener bottles. 2. Observation on [DATE] at 2:00 P.M. of the refrigerator on the 300 Hall revealed a vial of Aplisol (Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative, Diluted [Stabilized Solution]), used for diagnosing tuberculosis, was opened but was not dated. Interview on [DATE] at 2:01 P.M. with Registered Nurse #89 confirmed the tuberculin solution was opened with no date marked to indicate when the solution had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility recipes, and policy review, the facility failed to properly prepare pureed food. This had the potential to affect all eight facility identified residents (#9, #10, #17, #29, #40, #47, #49, and #56) in the facility who receive a pureed diet. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 04/12/22 at 9:23 A.M. revealed [NAME] #21 prepared pureed ham for the lunch meal. [NAME] #21 stated there was one pureed diet, which was liquified, and the remainder of the pureed diets were standard puree. [NAME] #21 placed ham into the food processor, turned the food processor on, and then added water to the food processor. [NAME] #21 continued to add water to the food processor until the ham was a watery consistency. [NAME] #21 then scooped a portion of the liquified ham mixture into an insulated bowl and informed the surveyor the contents in the bowl were for the liquified pureed diet. [NAME] #21 then added thickening powder to the ham mixture to create an appropriate pureed-textured ham for the remainder of the pureed diets.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly prepare medications for administration. This had the potential to affect three Residents (#15, #23, and #59) out of 25 residents who reside on the Oak and Pine unit. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 04/12/22 at 2:59 P.M. of the medication cart on the Oak and Pine unit revealed there were three cups of pre-poured medications prepared for three Residents (#15, #23, and #59) in the top drawer of the cart. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #80 during the observation on 04/12/22 at 2:59 P.M. revealed the medications pre-poured for Resident #15 included two glyburide five milligrams (mg) pills, the medication pre-poured for Resident #23 included percocet (controlled opoid) 7.5/325 mg, and the medications pre-poured for Resident #59 were robaxin 500 mg and percocet 7.5/325 mg. Interview on 04/12/22 at 3:05 P.M. with the Manager of Clinical Services #87 verified the medications were prepared improperly for Resident #15, #23, and #59, when the medications were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-10-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code information on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected two (#2 and #12) of 23 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy in the final sample. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 06/16/18. Diagnoses included dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and indicated Resident #2 had impairment in functional limitations for both sides of upper and lower extremities. Observation on 10/02/19 at 2:09 P.M. revealed Resident #2 participating in activities. She was observed walking in the common area, drinking juice, flipping pages of a magazine and smacking her hands on a table for attention. There were no functional limitations observed with the resident's upper extremities. Interview with MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #37 on 10/03/19 at 1:55…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · C2022-04-14 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on personnel file review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) received annual performance review evaluations. This affected two (STNA #38 and STNA #61) of two STNA's reviewed for annual performance evaluations and had the potential to affect all 87 residents. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of STNA #38's personnel file revealed STNA #38 was hired on 07/02/19. Further review of STNA #38's personnel file revealed STNA #38 did not receive an annual performance review evaluation between 07/2020 and 04/14/22. 2. Review of STNA #61's personnel file revealed STNA #61 was hired on 09/03/15. Further review of STNA #61's personnel file revealed STNA #61 did not receive an annual performance review evaluation between 09/03/20 and 04/14/22. Interview on 04/14/22 between 12:30 P.M. and 1:15 P.M. with Human Resources Director #42, verified STNA #61 and STNA #38 did not receive an annual performance review evaluations during the dates specified.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $681K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH