Residence At Huntington Court

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 91.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic medication interchange was reconciled timely resulting in a significant medication error for the resident's diabetic medication (insulin). This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #102 did not receive her insulin as ordered on 11/20/22 which resulted in Resident #102 being admitted to the hospital with a high blood sugar reading of 964 milligrams (mg)/ deciliter (dL). This affected one (#102) out of the three residents reviewed for medications administration. The facility census was 85. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 11/17/22 with medical diagnoses of protein calorie malnutrition, diabetic mellitus with ketoacidosis, dysphagia, and senile degeneration of the brain. Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of reusable equipment between residents and failed to maintain clean linen storage. This affected Residents #37 and #38 and had the potential to affect the 13 residents residing on the F Hallway. The facility census was 89.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis and sarcoid myocarditis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders for Resident #37 dated 03/11/26 revealed an order for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to an indwelling urinary catheter and maintain contact precautions due to Klebsiella Pneumoniae.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included onychogryphosis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for hearing aids and hearing loss for a resident. This affected one (Resident #50) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 89.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and encephalopathy Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had minimal difficulty hearing and hearing aids. The MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had severely impaired cognition, had moderate difficulty with hearing, and did wear hearing aids.Review of Resident #50's care plan with last revision date of 03/13/26 revealed there was no focus of area of the resident being hard of hearing or wearing a hearing aid. There were no interventions in place for the care and storage of the hearing aid.Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hairnets worn by dietary staff in the kitchen restrained all of their hair to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner for the 90 residents who received food from the kitchen. The census was 90. Findings included: During an observation on 06/18/25 at 9:57 A.M., [NAME] #1 was noted to prepare pureed foods. [NAME] #1 wore a hairnet that covered the top part of her hair. [NAME] #1's hair hung down her back and approximately 12 inches of her hair was outside of the hairnet. During an observation on 06/18/25 at 11:10 A.M., [NAME] #1 prepared the lunch meal and the back of her hair remained outside the hairnet. During an observation on 06/18/25 at 11:34 A.M., [NAME] #1 served residents their lunch meal from the steam table and the back of her hair remained outside the hairnet. During an interview on 06/18/25 at 12:30 P.M., [NAME] #1 stated the hairnet should cover her whole head. [NAME] #1 stated she was in a hurry and forgot to properly put on the hairnet. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nail care was provided for one (#24) of 18 sampled residents. The census was 90. Findings included: Review of an admission record revealed the facility admitted Resident #24 on 01/10/25 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of the right posterior cerebral artery, dementia with agitation, need for assistance with personal care, type II diabetes mellitus, and contracture of the muscle of the left upper arm. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/19/25, revealed Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (7), which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment indicated the resident was dependent on staff for bathing and required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #24's care plan report, included a focus area initiated 01/29/25, that indicated the resident's needs for activities of daily living…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications when the blood pressure was out of physician prescribed parameters which resulted in a significant medication error. This affected one (#29) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 90. Findings included: Review of an admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident #29 on 07/26/18. Diagnoses included acute combined systolic and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/21/25, revealed Resident #29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine (9), which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #29's care plan report included a focus area initiated 06/29/23 that indicated the resident had cardiac symptoms. Interventions directed staff to administer medications as ordered, monitor for side effects related to anti-hypertensive medication, and monitor the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during dining services and failed to ensure gloves were changed and hand hygiene was completed during a wound dressing change. This affected three (#57, #22 and #79) of 20 residents who ate in their room on 05/16/22 during lunch and affected one (#82) of two residents reviewed for dressing changes during the annual survey. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #82 revealed an admission of 07/30/20. Diagnoses included sepsis unspecified organism, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency neurogenic bladder, and wound infection. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #82 dated 05/17/22 revealed to cleanse the area to the sacrum with normal saline, pat dry, apply one-fourth strength Dakins soaked gauze to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the correct code status was available in the residents' chart. This affected one (Resident #47) of 20 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 02/25/22. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage four, cardiomegaly (enlarged heart), stroke, hypertension and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #47's code status was do not resuscitate (DNR). Review of Resident #47's paper chart revealed a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNR-CC) order signed on 12/02/20. Review of the electronic medical record revealed Resident #47 was a full code. There was a physician order dated 02/25/21 for Resident #47 to be a full code. Interview on 5/17/22 at 9:37 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #154…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain a laboratory value as ordered by the physician for a resident. This affected one (Resident #49) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission dated of 10/07/20. Diagnoses included hypothyroidism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was assessed as being cognitively intact. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 02/09/22 revealed Resident #49 was currently on Levothyroxine 25 micrograms (mcg) daily and there was no evidence of a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (laboratory value) in Resident #49's chart. A recommendation of a drawing a TSH now and at least yearly after was made. The physician signed and agreed with the recommendation on 02/17/22. Review of the physician orders dated 02/17/22 revealed an order for a TSH laboratory value in the A.M. and in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's used clinical references, the facility failed to have justification for use of an antibiotic to treat a urinary tract infection for Resident #30. This affected one (Resident #30) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/16. Diagnoses included dementia, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #30's physician orders dated 03/19/22 revealed an order for Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (HCl) (antibiotic) 250 milligram (mg) two times a days for a UTI for seven days. Review of the medication administration records (MARs) revealed Ciprofloxacin was administered as ordered starting on 03/19/22. Further review of Resident #30's medical record revealed no documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Program policies and procedures, review of water monitoring, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program which specified and monitored control measures to ensure the plan was effective in the destruction of Legionella bacteria. This had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 81. Findings include: The facility's Legionella water management program was reviewed with Maintenance Staff (MS) #73 on 03/28/19. Review of the plan revealed the facility was monitoring the chlorine level in facility water supply in select resident room, and water temperatures at the point of delivery within the facility. The monthly total chlorine and total free chlorine reading of the water in the facility was 0.0 on 02/14/19 and on 03/04/19, and when checked with MS #73 at 10:37 A.M. The chlorine level inspection sheet the facility was using did not specify what the desired/acceptable parameter for chlorine levels in the facility water supply were or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $911K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH