Regency Florence

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 43.0 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.27 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.35 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe mechanical lift transfer during care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for accidents. Resident 11 sustained a pelvic fracture and bilateral leg fractures. Findings include: Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 7/2015 and readmitted on 8/2023 with diagnoses including a pelvic fracture and bilateral leg fractures. An 8/9/23 Fall Incident Report revealed the following: -Resident 11 fell out of a mechanical lift during a two-person transfer. -Staff 8 (CNA) and Staff 24 (CNA) were getting Resident 11 ready for her/his smoke break, the bottom left side of the sling came off the hook. Resident 11 hit her/his head on the bottom of the bed, Staff 8 ran out of the room for help, and Staff 24 stayed with the resident. -Resident 11 was alert and talking and stated, I fell out and hit my head on the bed, but it is my legs and lower back that are hurting. Staff were unable to move Resident 11 due to her/his yelling out in pain and waited for the paramedics to arrive. -Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 6 and 7) reviewed for unnecessary medications and skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including surgical wound infection and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Resident 6's 2/27/26 admission MDS revealed Resident 6 had a history of depression, took medication for anxiety, and had a wound VAC (a non-surgical treatment that applies controlled suction to a wound to accelerate healing). A review of Resident 6's physician orders revealed orders for care for a wound VAC, hydroxyzine (an antianxiety medication), and duloxetine (an antidepressant). Resident 6's comprehensive care plan revealed no interventions related to her/his wound VAC. Resident 6's comprehensive care plan also did not have target behaviors or interventions for mood or anxiety related to her/his use of hydroxyzine and duloxetine. On 4/22/26 at 2:31…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#38) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for re-opening of closed wounds. Findings include: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and a history of cellulitis of the right lower leg.A 12/22/25 Initial Non-Pressure Skin Condition Evaluation indicated the presence of a four centimeter by four centimeter right lower leg venous ulcer on admission with a small amount of serosanguineous exudate (blood-tinged fluid drainage).A 1/5/26 Weekly Non-Pressure Skin Condition Evaluation indicated the right lower leg ulcer had resolved. Treatment continued for the right lower leg skin.On 4/21/26 at 2:04 PM, Resident 38 stated she/he was concerned about the condition of her/his right lower leg. The 4/22/26 physician order for treatment of Resident 38's right lower leg stated right lower extremity dressing changes-Primary Treatment: Cleanse with wound cleanser. Apply Xeroform,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control procedures for wound care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for pressure wounds and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and worsening wounds. Findings include: Based on a medication administration observation on 4/22/26 at 8:05 AM, Staff 11(RN) prepared medications for a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff 11 entered the room without performing hand hygiene. Staff 11 grasped the resident's water cup and handed it to her/him. Staff 11 provided eye drops and nasal spray to her/him. Staff 11 moved multiple cups on the overbed table and handled the medication cup, eye drops, and nasal spray. Staff 11 failed to sanitize the bottles after usage. Staff 11 returned to the medication cart and logged onto the computer without performing hand hygiene. Staff 11 stated she should perform hand hygiene before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for therapy, failed to provide incontinence care and failed to ensure a call light was accessible for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 102 and 104) reviewed for quality of care and treatment. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 102 was admitted to the facility in 2024, with diagnoses including stroke and diabetes. Resident 102's admission Orders dated 9/12/24 included orders for Physical and Occupational Therapy. On 3/25/25 at 1:34 PM, Staff 15 (OT/Therapy Manager) stated the resident was not seen for therapy as they had not received therapy orders. On 3/26/25 at 3:40 PM, Witness 1 (Family Member) stated the resident was admitted to the nursing facility for Respite Care (temporary relief for caregivers of individuals with chronic illness, disabilities, or special needs) in 9/2024. The resident's PCP included orders for PT and OT but the resident did not receive any therapy while at the facility. On 3/27/25 at 3:36 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain consent prior to administration of a vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including depression. A 12/4/24 review of immunizations revealed Resident 1 received a COVID-19 vaccine on 5/9/24. A 12/4/24 review of Resident 1's medical record revealed no evidence of a COVID-19 vaccine consent. On 12/6/24 at 10:46 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she was unable to locate a signed consent for the COVID-19 vaccine Resident 1 received on 5/9/24.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain information related to advance directives and health care decisions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having health care decisions honored. Findings include: Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 10/2021 with diagnoses including stroke. 5/23/23, 2/8/24, 2/22/24, 5/23/24 and 8/22/24 Interdisciplinary Care Conference notes revealed Resident 30 did not have an advance directive, but wanted one offered. Review of Resident 30's electronic record revealed no advance directive. On 12/3/24 at 9:43 AM Resident 30 stated she/he attended Care Conferences, but was not offered an advance directive. On 12/4/24 at 9:47 AM Staff 3 (Social Service Director) stated she offered advance directives at care conferences, and had the resident sign an admission Assessment document to verify they received the advance directive. Staff 3 stated she did not conduct follow up related to provision of advance directives. On 12/5/24 at Staff 1 (Administrator)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#94) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 94 admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including failure to thrive. On 9/23/24 a public complaint was received which alleged on 9/12/24 Resident 94 stated Staff 17 (Former Agency LPN) indicated she was going to administer her/him an extra dose of oxycodone beyond what was prescribed, laughed and walked out of the resident's room. Resident 94 stated she/he felt threatened, verbally abused, and the incident caused her/him increased anxiety. Resident 94 stated Staff 17 came to her/his room later and indicated she gave the resident an extra dose of oxycodone. Resident 94 stated she/he was extremely upset and scared. Resident 94 stated a couple hours later Staff 17 came back to her/his room and explained she administered an extra dose of oxycodone to another resident and not her/him, laughed, and walked out of her/his room. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow doctor's orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 24 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease. A review of Resident 24's medication orders revealed orders for Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution (a medication to treat shortness of breath) for five days beginning 11/22/24. A review of Resident 24's 11/2024 and 12/2024 MARs also revealed the medication should be discontinued after five days on 11/27/24, however the MAR indicated the medication was administered through 12/4/24. In an interview on 12/4/24 at 4:00 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the record showed Resident 24 continued to be given doses of Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution for seven days past the date the medication was ordered to be discontinued.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address orders for corrective lenses for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for unmet vision needs. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including depression. A 6/3/24 Encounter Summary revealed Resident 1 saw an optometrist on 6/3/24 and a prescription was written for glasses. On 12/2/24 at 2:51 PM Resident 1 stated she/he went to an eye exam about six months previously and was supposed to get glasses, but did not. On 12/4/24 at 8:48 AM Staff 3 (Social Service Director) stated Resident 1 had her/his eyes checked on 6/3/24 but was unaware of the order for new glasses. On 12/4/24 at 2:04 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated Resident 1 had an order for glasses but did not receive new glasses. Staff 2 acknowledged Resident 1 did not receive timely follow up for new glasses.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and monitor pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 11 and 94) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for unassessed and unmet treatment needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 1/2017 with diagnoses including dementia. a. An 10/18/24 New Pressure Injury Incident Report indicated Staff 15 (LPN) was completing wound care for Resident 11 and noticed a new pressure injury to the left heel. The heel tissue was purple in color, soft to the touch, and the skin was intact. Staff 15 stated Resident 11 did not have her/his feet elevated with a pillow. Staff 11 (NA) reported the resident was upset and kicked the pillow off the bed. An 8/28/24 Care Plan revealed staff were to float Resident 11's heels with pillows while she/he was in bed as she/he allowed. A review of Resident 11's medical record revealed a left heel facility-acquired pressure ulcer. There was no documentation in the resident's medical record the left heel wound was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,443 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-08-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR