No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

View Ridge Care Center

5129 Hilltop Road, Everett, WA 98203 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (425) 258-4474 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (425) 258-4474 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Nov 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
220 Olympic Boulevard
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.8 mi
4920-A Evergreen Way · (425) 252-4109 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
801 Pecks Dr · (425) 353-1000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4813 Forest Dr · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.4%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms40.5%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.6%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.5%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.0%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.1%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%13.4%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.9%CMS range 59.4–75.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.4–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.5–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.75
RN hoursweekends
37.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 58.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-24)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-24 · tag F0847 — widespread
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed explain and ensure residents understood the arbitration agreement for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 74, 75, and 81) when reviewed for arbitration agreement. This failure placed residents at risk of forfeiting their right to a jury trial, inability to seek restitution for errors made by the facility, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of Resident 74's arbitration agreement, dated 11/18/2025, was electronically signed by them. Review of Resident 74's electronic medical record documented they had a diagnosis of dementia, their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score was 7 out of 15 (indicative of severe impairment), and their family member was their power of attorney.Review of Resident 75's arbitration agreement, dated 11/04/2025, was electronically signed by them.Review of Resident 81's arbitration agreement, dated 11/16/2025, was electronically signed by them.In an interview on 11/19/2025 at 2:02 PM Staff C, Admissions Coordinator, stated they assisted and reviewed the arbitration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 81) reviewed for Transmission Based Precaution (TBP-are a set of infection control measures used in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of infectious diseases that are transmitted through contact with an infected patient, their bodily fluids, or contaminated surfaces or objects), 1 of 1 residents (Resident 3) observed during wound dressing change, 1 of 1 residents (Resident 78) observed for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC- a long, thin tube inserted into a small arm vein and threaded to a large vein near the heart) dressing changes and the develop a facility water management program to protect against the transmission of Legionella (serious type of pneumonia called Legionnaires' Disease).Findings included .<RESIDENT 81> Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow-up on concerns of the resident council related to resident care for 4 of 5 resident council meeting minutes (June-August 2025 and October 2025) when reviewed for resident council. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure for addressing resident concerns from Resident Council, undated, documented if there was a concern brought up from resident council, a grievance form would be filled out. Missing clothing, concerns about food, concerns about care and/or call light response time required a grievance form completed and turned into the administrator, director of nurses, and the social services director with the resident council minutes. Review of Resident Council Minutes for the following months showed:06/11/2025 documented noise at shift change and concerns for call light response at shift change.07/09/2025 documented showers requested for more than twice a week and concerns of running out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided notices of their resident rights, both orally and written, annually for interviewed in the resident council for 4 of 10 who attended (Residents 6, 8, 29, 30). This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.Findings included .During a Resident Council meeting on 11/20/2025 at 10:00 AM, four of 10 residents who attended stated they were not aware of their resident rights. When asked if staff talk about and review the rights of residents in the facility Residents 6. 8, 29 and 30 indicated they had not.During an interview on 11/20/2025 at 10:00 AM, Staff D, Activities Director, stated they had not been reviewing the resident rights in the resident council meeting and would be doing so moving forward. Staff D stated they were unaware they should be reviewing resident rights during the resident council meetings.Reference WAC 388-97-0300 (1) (a)

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment accurately reflected the status for 3 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 8, 58, and 80) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 8> Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - final stage of kidney disease where kidneys can no longer function adequately requiring dialysis), malnutrition (body does not receive enough protein and calories to maintain proper health), and epilepsy (neurologic disorder characterized by recurrent seizures). Review of Resident 8's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/09/2025, showed the resident required supervision or touching assist to eat meals. Review of the Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual staff performance reviews yearly as required and provide education based on the outcome of these reviews for 3 of 6 sampled staff (Staff R, S, and T) reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or underqualified care staff, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .<Staff R>Review of Staff Rs', Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC), personnel file showed they were originally hired on 06/20/2023. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found. <Staff R>Review of Staff R's, NAC, personnel file showed they were originally hired on 09/27/2023. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found. <Staff T>Review of Staff T's, NAC, personnel file showed they were originally hired on 04/30/2024. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found.In an interview on 11/24/2024 at 12:30 PM Staff B, Director of Nurses, stated there was a new system in which annual reviews were being electronically coordinated. Staff B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 nurse aides (Staff S, T and W) had their required 12 hours of in-service training. The failure to ensure Nursing Assistants Certified (NACs) received 12 hours per year in-service training placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . In a review of the NAC training hours showed Staff S, T and W had not received a minimum of 12 hours of training within the year.In an interview on 11/19/2025 at 10:30 AM Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated they had a new electronic system in place which did not record all training completed in an easy-to-read format. Staff B stated the staff development coordinator had not kept records of staff's training accurately. WAC 388-97-1680(2)(a-c)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that power of attorney (POA) legal documents were in the resident's medical record for 1 of 4 (Resident 5) residents reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the resident at risk of having someone make medical decisions for the resident without proper legal authority, possible unmet care needs, or unwanted medical treatments.Findings included .Resident 5 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (lung disease characterized by obstructed air flow, which causes shortness of breath, and chronic cough)Review of Resident 5's electronic heath record (EHR) showed they had a POA listed on their profile page, which indicated the POA was for financial, care and medical decisions.Review of Resident 5's EHR showed there were no legal POA documents found or provided.In an interview on 11/20/2025 at 12:08 PM, Staff U,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an allegation of neglect to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 78) reviewed for abuse/neglect reporting. This failure placed residents at risk for potential unidentified and ongoing abuse and lack of protection from abuse.Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy, undated, documented the reported allegations of abuse or neglect by following nursing home guidelines outlined in the Purple Book.Review of the Purple Book, dated October 2015, documented a report must be made when there was a reasonable cause to believe violations had occurred involving abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. Neglect was defined as 1) pattern of conduct or inaction by an individual or entity with a duty of care for nursing home residents. Or 2) a one-time act or omission by an individual or entity with a duty of care for nursing home residents.In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to reflect the resident's current medical status and/or to include all provided nursing services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 19) reviewed for edema management, 1 of 1 residents (Resident 80) reviewed for stroke and impaired vision. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving needed care, decline in condition, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .<EDEMA MANAGEMENT> <RESIDENT 19> Resident 19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include developmental disability and localized edema (swelling). In a review of Resident 19's admission and Quarterly Nursing assessment dated [DATE] documented they had swelling to both their lower legs. Review of Resident 19's care plan dated 10/29/2025 documented they had pain related to edema and had potential for skin issues related to edema. Resident 19's care plan provided no description of their edema, how it manifested, or how to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that ensured a resident's abilities in activities of daily living (ADLs) did not diminish for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 19) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure put residents at risk for physical decline and decreased quality of life.Findings Included .Resident 19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include developmental disability and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 19's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used to screen for cognitive impairment) dated 10/23/2025 documented a score of 8 out of 15, indicating the resident had moderate impairment. Review of Resident 19's care plan, dated 10/29/2025, documented they required limited assistance by one staff with personal hygiene and oral care. In an observation and interview on 11/19/2025 at 10:03 AM, Resident 19 stated they did not know where their toothbrush was located and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) for 1 of 2 sampled dependent residents (Resident 58) reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to provide one-to-one feeding assistance to Resident 58. This failure placed residents at risk for inadequate nutrition and unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included.Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA- A short-term block in blood flow to the brain that causes symptoms similar to a stroke), dementia, muscle weakness and lack of coordination.Review of Resident 58's care plan, dated 09/23/2024 and revised on 08/27/2025, documented they required one-to-one assistance to eat their meals.In a continuous observation starting at 11/20/2025 at 12:01 PM, Resident 58 was observed in common area, across from the nurse's station, with their lunch on an overbed table in front of them. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 of 4 residents (Resident 58) consistent equipment and assistance to maintain their mobility. This failure placed residents at risk for decline in functional ability, frustration, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Restorative Nursing, showed the facility would ensure residents received the highest practicable level of care and the restorative program was to assist residents to get to their highest practicable level through physical exercise and rehabilitation. Procedures included making progress in the resident's electronic chart and updating the resident's care plan with measurable goals and timelines, weekly reviews/meetings of the charting by the restorative manager, restorative programs reviewed and noted in the resident's chart summarizing the program, goals, and progress. Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include transient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dialysis communication documents were filled out before and after the resident had their dialysis appointments for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 8) reviewed for dialysis. This failure placed Resident 8 at risk of inadequate information given to the dialysis staff, a lack of assessment and documentation upon arrival back to the facility, undetected dialysis complications, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) (final stage of kidney disease where kidneys can no longer function adequately requiring dialysis), malnutrition (body does not receive enough protein and calories to maintain proper health) and epilepsy (neurologic disorder characterized by recurrent seizures).In an interview on 11/18/2025 at 1:54 PM, Resident 8 stated they thought the facility and dialysis clinic should have better communication.Review of Resident 8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records reflected the accurate weight for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 81) reviewed for weights and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 58) and for complete records to include hospice communication/documentation. These failures placed residents at risk for inaccurate medication dosage calculation, unmet care needs and possible medical complications.Findings included.<RESIDENT 81> Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Date Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment, dated 10/21/2025, the resident was cognitively intact, and the weight entered in Section K was 179 pounds (lbs.). In an interview on 11/20/2025 at 8:19 AM, Resident 81 stated they were just weighed and it was 248 lbs. The resident added they had gained three lbs. Resident 81 stated they used to weigh more than 300 lbs. and was working on losing more weight. The resident stated they have not weighed less than 200 lbs. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 facility kitchens, 1 of 2 dining rooms (1st floor) and 2 of 2 nourishment refrigerators (1st and 2nd floors). The facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine maintained adequate hot water temperature, to ensure the kitchen and dining room ceilings were free of dust and lint, to ensure the nourishment refrigerators were clean and sanitary, to ensure food preparation equipment surfaces were sanitary, and to ensure overhead light fixtures were sanitary and in good repair. These failed practices placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included . In an observation on 08/27/2024 at 9:50 AM, the 2nd floor nourishment room refrigerator and freezer were observed to have sticky residue and scattered food/debris, and the freezer had approximately ½ inch of ice on the walls and upper and lower surfaces. In an observation on 08/27/2024 at 10:02 AM, the 1st floor nourishment room refrigerator and freezer units were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 medication carts (Carts 3 and 4) and 1 of 1 medication rooms (first floor medication room) had unexpired medications and/or biologicals and medications were stored at the proper temperature. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving compromised medications and biologicals. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, dated 03/30/2023, showed: Outdated medications were to be removed from inventory; Facility should maintain a temperature log in storage area and record temperatures at least once a day; If vaccines are stored in the refrigerator the temperature should be checked at least two times a day.; When the original seal of a multidose vial is broken, the container will be dated; Expiration date of a vial will be 30 days once opened. <CART 4> During an observation on 08/28/2024 at 9:42 AM, Medication cart 4 was reviewed with Staff M, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify a significant change and complete a timely Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) within the required 14-day timeframe for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for Hospice Services. Failure to complete the SCSA timely placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, decreased quality of care and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, stated a Significant Change in Status Assessment must be completed no later than 14 days from the Assessment Reference Date and no later than 14 days from the determination date of the significant change in status. (For purpose of this section, a significant change means a major decline in status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, that has an impact on more than one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 14) reviewed for Activities of daily living and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6) reviewed for dental care. This failure placed residents at risk for inaccurate care planning and decreased quality of care. Findings included . <Resident 14> Resident 14 admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia and Bipolar disorder. Review of Resident 14's Medication Administration Records for the prior six months showed the resident frequently refused ordered medications and treatments. Review of Resident 14's progress notes from April 1, 2024, through August 26, 2024, showed Resident 14 exhibited behaviors such as yelling, cursing and refusing cares. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident14 exhibited no behaviors or refusals of care in the reference period. Review of the Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition (RC) and a serious mental illness (SMI) prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) form was completed prior to admission and according to the guidelines specified for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 5 and 47) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Incomplete or inaccurate PASRR's placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or lack of access to specialized services for residents with identified mental health diagnoses or disability. Findings included . Review of the facility's PASRR policy dated 07/11/2024 showed the policy was in place to assure that the facility has reviewed a PASRR and determined if a potential resident was acceptable for admission into this facility. <RESIDENT 5> Resident 5 admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. Failure to ensure person centered care plans were developed and implemented placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF- a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a group of diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath), Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (a disease that occurs when your blood sugar is too high), Cataract (clouding of the normally clear lens of the eye), displacement of intraocular lens (a lens implanted in the eye usually as part of a treatment for cataracts). According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care and treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to ensure consistent communication and collaboration of care occurred between the facility and hospice care for 1 of 2 resident's (Resident 29) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to ensure the management of a high-risk medication (anticoagulant used to regulate how much the blood clots), including when to test for appropriate dose of the medication were communicated appropriately between the facility provider and the hospice provider. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised and updated consistent with the residents' goals and choices for end-of-life care. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary comfort care services, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility contract with Glacier Peak…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of 1 of 2 residents (Resident 29) reviewed for hospice services. The failure to ensure medications were acquired and administered as ordered, and follow facility processes for medications not available, placed residents at risk for adverse events related to missed medications. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications, dated January/2023 states all medications should be reordered in advance. All medications orders must be communicated to the pharmacy timely to provide the correct quantity. Resident 29 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder, and insomnia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 07/05/2024 showed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident 29's physician orders showed an order for Trazadone HCL (antidepressant medication)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 Residents (Resident 22) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Facility staff failed to identify/monitor target behaviors for antipsychotic medication and attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for an Antipsychotic medication. These failures placed residents at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications and experience adverse side effects. Findings included . Resident 22 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems). According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident was rarely or never understood due to severely impaired cognition, exhibited no hallucinations or delusions, exhibited physical behaviors such as grabbing, hitting 1 to 3 days in the reference period. Resident 22 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0811 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with physical impairment and/or swallowing difficulty were fed by staff that were properly trained for 1 of 2 staff (Staff L) observed providing feeding assistance to residents in the second-floor assisted dining room. This failure placed residents at risk of choking and aspiration (inhalation of food or fluid into the lungs) and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During the entrance conference meeting on 08/26/2024 at 11:20 AM, Staff A, Administrator, and Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated they did not have paid feeding assistants in the facility. During an observation on 08/28/2024 during the breakfast meal, six residents were sitting at individual tables. One staff member was present assisting residents. At 8:22 AM, Staff L, Activities Manager, entered the dining room and sat beside Resident 22. Staff L was observed giving Resident 22 several bites of food and drinks of a beverage. Review of Resident 22's care plan, print date 08/28/2024, showed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed procedures to prevent the spread of disease for 2 of 3 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 216) reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) and failure to store respiratory equipment in sanitary conditions for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 252) reviewed for respiratory care. Failure of staff to follow appropriate use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), perform hand hygiene consistently and properly store respiratory equipment, placed residents and staff at risk of transmitting a communicable disease and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility policy titled Enhance Barrier Precautions review date 03/22/2024, defined Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities. High-contact resident care activities included dressing, changing linens, changing briefs, and wound care. Review of the facility policy titled Nebulizer -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare foods in accordance with professional standards in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. Failure to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage were labeled and dated after opening, failure of staff to wash their hands, and failure to wear a hair net in food preparation areas had the potential to spread food borne illness. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hairnet Use, showed that all persons entering beyond the red line/clean kitchen area must wear a hairnet and gloves must be changed and hand hygiene performed each time the hairnet was touched. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dry Storage, Refrigerator, Standards of Specific Items, dated May 2017, stated that food items stored in bins should be clearly labeled and dated with use-by-date and prepared food items should be covered to protect from contamination during storage. On 05/08/2023 at 9:15 AM, the following observations in the kitchen were made with and verified by Staff C, Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for positioning and mobility was provided with a splint per Occupational Therapy's (OT) recommendations. Failure to provide a splint based on therapy recommendations had the potential for loss of Range of Motion (ROM) to affected joint and increased pain. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Mobility and Range of Motion Policy, dated 01/24/2023, showed residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. Review of a facility policy titled, AFO (ankle foot orthosis), cast, brace, or splint, dated 12/09/2022, showed that a device will be Care planned, set up with restorative if needed and/or placed on the TAR (Treatment Administration Record) for daily check of placement and comfort if needed. Resident 7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was followed for the management of the humidifier on the oxygen concentrator for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 23) reviewed for oxygen administration. Findings included . Resident 23 admitted to the facility 02/07/2022 with diagnoses including interstitial pulmonary disease (progressive scarring of the lung tissue), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (intermittent breathing cessation while sleeping), and heart disease. Review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (assessment of resident abilities and needs), dated 02/01/2023, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating resident was cognitively intact. Review of the current physician's orders showed an order dated 02/15/2022 to change the oxygen tubing weekly, and if humidifying, change the bottle weekly and as needed on Saturday. Review of Resident 23's care plan revealed a focus of oxygen (O2) therapy related to respiratory illness, initiated 05/20/2022. There was an intervention for O2 via nasal cannula (oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment and physician order was obtained for medications to be left at bedside for 1 of 1 resident (36) reviewed for self-medication program. Failure to assess if the resident had the cognitive and physical ability to keep medications at the bedside put residents at risk for using medication incorrectly and medications not being secure. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Self-Medication Administration, dated 09/16/2022, showed that residents were assessed prior to having medications at bedside and a physician order would be obtained. Resident 36 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an observation and interview on 05/08/2023 at 10:15 AM, Resident 36 was observed applying Bengay (topical pain ointment) to their knees. Resident 36 stated that they also used Aspercreme (topical pain ointment) some days and that the facility knew she had them at the bedside. On 05/08/2023, a review of the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Pilot Butte Rehabilitation CenterBend, OR 1 of 5Puyallup Post AcutePuyallup, WA 2 of 5Park Rose Care CenterTacoma, WA 2 of 5Regency AlbanyAlbany, OR 2 of 5Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing CenterCoupeville, WA 3 of 5Kauai Care CenterWaimea, HI 3 of 5Laurel Hill Nursing CenterGrants Pass, OR 3 of 5Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab CenterHermiston, OR 3 of 5Sharon Care CenterCentralia, WA 4 of 5Arlington Health And RehabilitationArlington, WA 4 of 5Regency Care Center At MonroeMonroe, WA 4 of 5Regency FlorenceFlorence, OR 5 of 5Good Samaritan Health Care CtrYakima, WA 5 of 5Mt Baker Care CenterBellingham, WA 5 of 5Regency At NorthpointeSpokane, WA 5 of 5Regency At The ParkCollege Place, WA 5 of 5Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick, WA 5 of 5Regency Care Of Central OregonBend, OR 5 of 5Regency Care Of Rogue ValleyGrants Pass, OR 5 of 5Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterGresham, OR 5 of 5Regency Harmony House Rehab & NursingBrewster, WA 5 of 5Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOlympia, WA 5 of 5Regency OmakOmak, WA 5 of 5Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing CentPrineville, OR 5 of 5Regency Redmond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRedmond, OR 5 of 5Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing CenterWenatchee, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CLAY, JAMESIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
LEEBRON CLAY, ANDREAIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
NIGHTINGALE HEALTHCARE LLC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
GABALDON, BRITTNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/07/2023
JOHNSON, PATRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
SEKERAMAYI, FLOYDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
MERL INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2017
PREMERE REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$453K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 17%Other / private 30%

This home reported $453K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$463per resident / day
operating cost
$14,090per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$444per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505362. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next