No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing Center

311 Northeast 3rd Street, Coupeville, WA 98239 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (360) 678-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$131,131 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $131,131 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-22)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 N Main St · (360) 678-5151 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7 NE Birch St · (360) 678-8640 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
107 S Main St · (360) 678-4917 · Call to confirm hours
Park
600 NE 9th St · (360) 678-5431 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.4%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.4%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.1%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.4%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.3%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine55.4%82.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission39.5%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.4%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.991.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.941.521.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.5%CMS range 39.5–52.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.0–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.1%CMS range 3.3–7.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.99
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.70
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
52.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 72.0 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.445 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-30)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff performed Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) who was found unresponsive and had a physician order to initiate CPR and signed POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment- a form indicating the resident's wishes to have or not have CPR) for life-sustaining care and services. The failure to train staff on the facility's expectation how to respond to a resident requiring CPR, locate, for immediate reference, resident POLST/Advanced Directives, and accurately assess signs of irreversible death, resulted in staff not following Resident 1's CPR directives, and placed other current residents with CPR directives at risk of not receiving CPR and/or full medical interventions in an emergency which constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-noncompliance that has caused or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The facility corrected the above deficient practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when they failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or call 911 for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) timely to respond correctly to a medical emergency for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. Resident 1 experienced harm when the resident was found unresponsive, required CPR that was not initiated by facility staff and an unexpected death occurred. The facility staff were aware of the CPR protocol but failed to follow directives that resulted in a delay in 911 EMS call, and the initiation of CPR was delayed by 45 minutes. These failures placed all residents at risk of unmet care needs and potential neglect. The facility corrected the above deficient practice prior to the initiation of the abbreviated survey on [DATE]. This failure was a past noncompliance G (the facility was not in compliance at the time the situation occurred; however, there was sufficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 169, 13, and 37) reviewed for accidents, were free of accident hazards, individualized care plan approaches were followed, effectiveness of current care plan interventions were evaluated, addition preventative measures to prevent falls were implemented, and assistance with meals was provided. Resident 169 was harmed when the identified care plan interventions to assist the resident with one-person maximal assistance with walking were not followed and the resident experienced a fall with fracture injury to their left greater trochanter (upper part of the thigh bone). These failures placed residents at risk for further accidents, falls, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <FALLS> RESIDENT 169 Resident 169 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the resident's left side, dementia, depression, lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from physical abuse for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 4 and 5) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. Additionally, the facility failed to consistently supervise, accurately assess, and care plan 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 5) who had a known history of verbal and physical outbursts towards others, reviewed for 1:1 monitoring. Resident 5 caused an unsafe environment for Resident 6 when they blocked them from leaving a public area. This failure placed residents at risk for potential physical or mental abuse, feeling safe, experiencing fear, intimidation, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised on 10/2022, documented it is the policy of the facility to protect residents from mistreatment, neglect, and abuse. The facility defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident choices/preferences regarding their bathing schedule were honored for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3) reviewed for choices. These failures placed the residents at risk for decreased cleanliness, increased risk of infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 1>Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include dementia with anxiety. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 12/30/2025, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 1's bathing/shower care plan, dated 07/08/2025, documented the resident frequently declined showers and required maximal assistance of one person for showering. There was no information directing staff on what to do when the resident refused a shower. Review of Resident 1's December 2025 Documentation Survey Report v2 (a report that showed the Nursing Assistant Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, and accessible clinical records for 5 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 10 and 11) reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. The failure to maintain clinical records in accordance with professional standards of practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1>Review of Resident 1 December 2025 Documentation Survey Report v2 (a report that showed the Nursing Assistant Certified documentation to specific tasks performed with a resident), showed several missing entries of Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC) documentation. Review of the intervention/tasks showed: - The task of ALL CARE PROVIDED, there was no documentation on 12/02/2025, 12/11/2025, 12/13/2025, 12/14/2025, 12/17/2025 – 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, and 12/28/2025 (day shift), once on evening shift (12/02/2025), and three days on night shift (12/16/2025, 12/22/2025, and 12/31/2025).-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in care conferences (a collaborative care plan meeting where a resident's care was discussed and coordinated by a team of health care providers, family members and residents) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for participation in care planning. This failure placed residents at risk of not being allowed to be involved and informed about care and services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility's policy, titled, Interdisciplinary Care Conference, dated 3/2024 and revised on 12/16, documented an interdisciplinary care conference is completed upon the resident's admission to the facility, quarterly, and following a change in condition. The resident and/or the resident representative will be invited to the care conference. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include dementia with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party of orders for a new medication for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notification of changes. This failure prevented the person responsible for making healthcare decisions from being part of the care planning process and being knowledgeable about medications the resident was taking. Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include dementia with anxiety. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 12/30/2025, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment.During a telephone interview on 02/12/2026 at 11:00 AM, Collateral Contact 1 (CC 1), Resident 1's responsible party, stated they were not kept informed of when Resident 1 had any changes in their medications. Review of a physician order, dated 01/21/2026, documented to increase Resident 1's acetaminophen (a pain reliver) to two tablets every 12 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) process received the required follow up from the Regional Developmental Disabilities Act (DDA) Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition (RC) PASRR team before admission to the facility and failed to ensure they were referred for a PASRR Level 2. These failures placed Resident 2 at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the Level 1 PASRR document, revised 06/2025, documented if the resident had an ID or RC, the form was to be forwarded to the Regional DDA ID/RC PASRR team, and follow up by the DDA Administration was required before the resident could be admitted to a nursing facility.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include intellectual disabilities, and disorders of psychological development.Review of Resident 2's Level 1 PASRR, dated 02/09/2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required notices were provided to 3 of 4 residents (Residents 11, 23 and 43) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to provide and follow-up to ensure communication of the required notices, placed residents and their representatives at risk of being uninformed of their legal rights related to bed hold and transfer/discharge status. Findings included .<RESIDENT 23> Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy (alteration in consciousness that is induced by brain dysfunction), Parkinson’s disease (progressive movement disorder of the nervous system) and clostridium difficile (bacterium that causes an infection of the colon). Review of Resident 23’s progress note dated 07/23/2025 at 12:15 PM, Staff N documented the resident was hard to arouse throughout the morning and that the provider was notified and the resident was sent to the hospital. Review of Resident 23’s progress notes dated 07/23/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were reviewed and acted upon for five of six months reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for delays in necessary medication changes, risk for adverse side effects, and receiving medications without required pharmacist oversight. Findings included .Review of the (undated) facility policy titled Timeliness of Medication Regimen Review (MRR) Reports documented that the facility would receive MRR reports within 3 days of the pharmacist review, and the provider would review and respond to reports within 14 days. The policy did not address the timeliness of the facility to note and implement the recommendations after the provider reviewed them. The policy also stated if the pharmacist identified an irregularity that needed urgent attention, they would notify the facility to ensure prompt attention from the physician. It is noted that recommendations that were labeled as urgent were, in fact, addressed. The following applied to the remainder of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for five of eight residents (3, 10, 12, 13, and 21) reviewed for medications. Failure to follow physician's orders related to medication parameters placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes including low blood pressure which can result in dizziness and fainting from receiving medications which were outside of the ordered parameters for administration.Findings included .<RESIDENT 3> Resident 3 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include respiratory disease, heart failure and high blood pressure. Review of the physician medication orders showed the resident received Metoprolol (a hypertension medication) twice daily and Digoxin (a heart medication) daily. The Licensed Nurse (LN) was to hold the medications if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was below 110, or the heart rate was below 60. Review of the July Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 3 received the 07/13/2025 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and discarded when expired on 2 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication storage room reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the full benefits of the medications. Findings include .The facility provided policy was titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, last revised 08/01/2024 showed that the facility should ensure medications or biologicals that have an expired date on the label are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier.In an observation and interview on 07/28/2025 at 9:29 AM of the facility East medication room with Staff C showed that there were 3 sets of medical supplies with expiration dates of 12/31/2024 and one box of medical supplies with an expiration date of 04/13/2025. Staff C verified that the medical supplies were expired and should be removed.In an observation and interview on 07/28/2025 at 10:27 AM of facility medication cart #3 with Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory (labs) tests were completed as ordered and to provide timely laboratory results to meet the needs of six of eight residents (Residents 4, 8, 10, 21, 70 and 72) reviewed for laboratory services. These failed practices had the potential for negative complications related to delay of obtaining and follow up of laboratory results along with a risk for medical complications, related to a lack of monitoring chronic medical conditions and delayed identification and treatment of underlying health conditions.Findings included.<RESIDENT 70> Resident 70 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis (serious complication of infection causing inflammatory response throughout the entire body and can potentially lead to organ failure). Review of Resident 70’s admission orders showed several labs to be done twice weekly to monitor the status of the resident’s sepsis: CBC (Complete Blood Count), CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel), ESR, CRP,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in which resident records were complete, accurate, accessible, and that documentation was in accordance with state law for 6 residents (Residents 3,8,10,30,32,and 43), and on one of two resident units. Failure to ensure records included accurate and timely entries and prohibit the use of stamped signatures on medical records, placed residents at risk for records that did not accurately reflect their care, and placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, General Documentation Guidelines, dated 3/2013, showed the procedure for completing and correcting clinical records was:- Every entry shall be recorded promptly as the events or observations occur. - All entries should be complete, concise, descriptive and accurate- Record pertinent observations, psychosocial and physical manifestations, incidents, unusual occurrences and abnormal behavior. -All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federally required screening of all individuals who have a serious mental illness (SMI) report into the resident's assessment, and care planning for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 8) reviewed for PASRR. Facility failure to incorporate the PASRR recommendations into the residents' assessment and care plan delayed the implementation of recommendations and left the residents at risk for unmet mental health and activity needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 11/2016 directed the interdisciplinary team to incorporate level II recommendations into the resident's care plan. Resident 8 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a history of depression and moderate dementia with anxiety. Review of the clinical record showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were completed timely following a significant change in status for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 10 and 21) reviewed for possible serious mental disorders and related conditions. This failure resulted in a potential inability to receive and benefit from Level II PASRR services for Residents 10 and 21, and placed other residents at risk for unmet mental health needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), dated 11/2016, showed the PASRR would be reviewed and updated as indicated with significant changes in residents' physical or mental condition. The state mental health authority would be notified of the changes affecting the residents' physical or mental condition. <RESIDENT 10>Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include post-traumatic stress disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 13) reviewed for medication management. Failure to obtain a doctor's order and failure to monitor residents use of their own medical equipment, placed residents at risk for injuries and potential adverse outcomes.Findings include.Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include lower extremity cellulitis (bacterial infection of the deeper layers of the skin) and polyneuropathy (nerve damage in multiple areas of the body). According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 07/15/2025, the resident was cognitively intact.In an observation and interview on 07/25/2025 at 9:58 AM, Resident 13 stated that the rectangular white machine that was on their table and was plugged in the electrical socket in the wall was a machine called Therma Zone (pain management device that provides heating and cooling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of 2 of 3 residents (Resident 70 and 72) reviewed for Admission/Discharge planning. Failure to ensure medications were acquired and administered as ordered, and to follow facility processes for medications not available, placed residents at risk for adverse events related to missing medications. Findings included .<Resident 70>Resident 70 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hypomagnesemia (low magnesium levels in the body). Review of Resident 70’s physician orders showed an order for Magnesium with calcium (a supplement for magnesium and calcium), three times a day for a daily supplement with a start date of 05/01/2025 at 6:00 PM. Resident 70’s physician orders showed an order for Magnesium Oxide three times a day for Hypomagnesemia with a start date of 05/06/2025 at 12:00 PM. Review of Resident 70’s electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for May 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff recognize and report timely allegations of abuse/neglect for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for allegations of abuse/neglect. These failures to timely report and investigate allegations of abuse/neglect and unexpected death placed residents at risk for potential abuse/neglect. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book) dated [DATE], showed Unexpected Death, possibly related to abuse or neglect, Not related to abuse/neglect but suspicious needed to be reported to the State Hotline, Law enforcement agency as needed if a crime was suspected, Coroner or Medical Examiner and must be logged within 5 days of the event/incident. <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include left femur fracture, malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body) and dysphagia (difficulty or inability to swallow). Review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure thorough investigations were completed for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for allegations of abuse and/or neglect. Failure to conduct thorough investigations to identify root cause(s) and all contributing factors related to allegations of abuse and/or neglect placed all residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, unidentified corrective actions, potential harm and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility provided policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised 10/2022 documented during the investigation, the data collection involved interview of the alleged resident victim, interview caregivers, family, visitors, roommates and the alleged perpetrator. The policy also documented that after an investigation was complete, action to correct the reasonable cause of the incident and prevent further recurrences must be taken. According to the Washington State Reporting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that thorough investigations were completed for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for allegations of abuse/neglect. Failure to conduct thorough investigations to identify root cause and all contributing factors related to allegations of abuse/neglect placed all residents at risk for unidentified abuse, unidentified corrective actions, and potential harm and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility provided policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised 10/2022 showed during the investigation, the data collection involved interview of the alleged resident victim, interview caregivers, family, visitors, roommates and the alleged perpetrator. <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include sepsis (chemicals released into the bloodstream to fight infection trigger inflammation throughout the body), acute cystitis (inflammation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility administration failed to ensure the facility maintained substantial compliance with federal and state regulatory requirements and to meet the significant needs of the residents. The administration failed to provide sorely needed administrative oversight and monitoring of facility personnel, systems, policies and practices related to residents' care plan timing and revision, professional standards of care, ensuring competency of nursing staff and completion of required nursing assistants performance reviews, psychotropic medication management, infection control and coordination of dental services. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility Administrator position description, dated May 2015, showed the administrator was responsible for the daily operation of the facility and they were to utilize resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest level of care for residents in accordance with regulatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing assistant competencies were assessed and completed yearly, for 5 of 5 staff (L, N, O, P and Q) employee files reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of the nursing assistants and impact the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Staff L, Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC) was hired 09/29/2023. Review of the employee file showed no documentation of a yearly skills checklist having been performed in the last year. In an interview on 10/28/2024 at 11:41 AM, Staff L, NAC, confirmed they had been at the facility over a year and had not had competencies or skill checks done other than someone watched them do hand hygiene a couple months back. Staff N, NAC, was hired 05/12/2023. Review of the employee file showed no documentation of a yearly skills checklist having been performed. Staff O, NAC, was hired 07/17/2023. Review of the employee file showed no documentation of a yearly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual Nurse Aide Certified (NAC) performance reviews were completed for 5 of 5 employees (Staff L, N, O, P, and Q ) files reviewed who had been employed longer than 1 year. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of these NACs and the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Review of the facility handbook dated May 2023, showed the performance management system is designed to provide employees with specific feedback on their job performance for the previous evaluation periodm and to establish new objectives and goals for the upcoming review period. Employees and supervisors are encourged to provide mutual feedback and communication about performance, expectations, and other work issues on a regualr basis. You also may request performance feedback from your supervisor at any time. Staff L was hired on 09/29/2023. Review of Staff L's employee file showed there was no current employee evaluation done. There was no evidence the evaluator completed this evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored under sanitary conditions in 2 of 2 nourishment rooms (East and [NAME] units) and 1 of 1 facility kitchens. The failure to ensure overhead light fixtures, toasters, microwave ovens and refrigerator/freezer units were sanitary placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <UNIT NOURISHMENT ROOMS/REFRIGERATORS/FREEZERS/MICROWAVE OVENS/TOASTERS> In an observation on 10/23/2024 at 11:09 AM, the East unit nourishment room refrigerator/freezer units in the clean utility room were soiled with food matter and spillage. The microwave oven in the nourishment room was very soiled with food splattering and debris inside and out. In an observation on 10/23/2024 at 11:16 AM, the [NAME] unit nourishment refrigerator/freezer units with very soiled with spilled food matter, and the freezer unit had lots of ice buildup. The microwave oven was very soiled. In an observation/interview on 10/23/2024 at 1:40 PM, the toasters in the East and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment was clean and sanitary, and failed to identify and provide the necessary housekeeping services to ensure privacy curtains were laundered or replaced in resident (Residents 4 and 7) rooms on 1 of 2 units. These failures placed residents at risk for infectious disease and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 4> In an interview and observation on 10/22/2024 at 11:43 AM, Resident 4 was in bed with both privacy curtains pulled around them. Both privacy curtains were heavily soiled with an 18 inch by 2-inch vertical brown stain on the left curtain and multiple brown and black areas on the right curtain. In multiple observations the privacy curtains remained unchanged on 10/23/2024 at 1:07 PM, 10/24/2024 at 9:55 AM, 10/25/2024 at 8:23 AM and 10/28/2024 at 9:30 AM. In an interview and observation on 10/29/2024 at 9:00 AM, Resident 4 was observed in bed behind both privacy curtains that remained soiled. Resident 4 stated they did not know when their privacy curtains were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly resolve and document resident grievances for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 67 and 4) reviewed for grievance resolution. The failure of staff to document, investigate, and resolve resident grievances resulted in delays in grievance resolution and an extended period where a resident went without their missing clothing, and placed residents at risk for frustration and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Grievance Procedure, revised date of October 2021, showed the facility would have a process in place for identification, investigation, and follow-up of resident grievances in a timely manner. The policy indicated they facility would identify a Grievance Officer to oversee the grievance procedure and coordinate the facility system for collecting, tracking, and responding to grievances. The policy indicated staff were trained on the facility's grievance procedure including the need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) was completed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 12) reviewed for decline in Activity of daily living (ADL). This failed practice placed residents at risk for inadequate care planning and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, stated a Significant Change in Status Assessment must be completed no later than 14 days from the Assessment Reference Date and no later than 14 days from the determination date of the significant change in status. (For purpose of this section, a significant change means a major decline in status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, that has an impact on more than one area of a resident's health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 3 sample residents (Residents 67 and 65) reviewed for devices and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for pressure injuries. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and service required to meet the residents' needs and for inaccuracies in care planning of the residents' care. Findings included . <RESIDENT 67> Resident 67 admitted to the facility 09/07/2024 with diagnoses to include a colostomy (colostomy - a surgery to create an opening for the colon (large intestine) through the abdominal wall). According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 09/11/2024, the resident had no cognitive impairment, and they had no ostomy, and they were coded they were always continent of bowels. In an observation/interview on 10/24/2024 at 1:10 PM, Resident 67 stated they had a colostomy that was used for them to have their bowel movements, and they showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screening for residents for a serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disability (ID) or a related condition was completed if the scheduled discharge did not occur for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 18) reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Level 1 PASRR screening form was accurate prior to admission to the nursing facility for 1 of 5 sample residents (Resident 38) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health and/or intellectual disability care needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 18> Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression, anxiety disorder and a history of delirium (a serious disturbance in mental abilities that results in confused thinking and reduced awareness of surroundings) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were revised to reflect changes or current status of 3 of 7 sample resident (Residents 4, 7, and 17) reviewed for care plans. These failures placed residents at risk of less-than-optimal care, staff not knowing how to properly care for a resident, a decreased quality of life with potential for harm. Findings included . <RESIDENT 4> Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA, a condition that affects blood flow to the brain) with hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and mild cognitive impairment. In a review of Resident 4's care plan dated [DATE] and most recently updated [DATE] showed a care plan focus of potential alteration in skin integrity related to decreased mobility following CVA with hemiparesis. The care plan showed Resident 4 preferred to remain up in their wheelchair throughout the day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 7, 17) reviewed for physician's orders on medication parameters and 1 of 1 sample residents (Resident 38) reviewed for admission orders. The failure to implement and follow physician prescribed orders placed residents at risk for adverse effects, unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 38> Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dislocation of right hip prosthesis and dementia unspecified with behavioral disturbance. Resident 38 was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 09/08/2024 for hip dislocation. In a record review on 10/28/2024 at 9:14 AM, Resident 38's hospital discharge note, dated 09/09/2024, the Emergency Department (ED) note stated, the ED provider recommended palliative care (a specialized medical care that focuses on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to advocate and assist 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 38) with their rights within the facility. The failure to assist the resident in having care planning meetings to ensure their voice was heard regarding their care and preferences placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled: Interdisciplinary Care Conference Revised date 11/2016 stated, the Interdisciplinary Care Conference is completed upon admission, quarterly and following a significant change in condition. The resident and/resident representative will be invited to care conference. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dislocation of right hip prosthesis and dementia unspecified with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident 38's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS -an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident rarely/nevererstood, has short-term and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 38 and Resident 58) reviewed for unnecessary medications, were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors). The facility failed to ensure there were valid diagnoses for use of psychotropic medications, behavior monitoring and to attempt gradual dose reductions (GDR). These failures placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications, for adverse events, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the FDA Boxed Warning: Elderly patients with dementia (a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities)-related psychosis (symptoms that happen when a person is disconnected from reality) treated with antipsychotic drugs (prescribed medication to treat psychosis) are at an increased risk of death. Seroquel is not approved for elderly with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to assist with access to preventative (and emergency) dental services for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 44 and 15) reviewed for dental services. Failure to follow up on dental referrals and ensure the coordination of dental services for residents who had missing, and broken teeth placed the residents at increased risk for continued dental problems, difficulty chewing, associated health complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 44> Resident 44 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, history of stroke, and difficulty swallowing. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 09/04/2024 showed the resident had intact cognition, and required substantial to maximum assistance for oral hygiene care assistance. The dental section was documented as unable to examine. Review of Resident 44's current care plan showed a focus area initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigations for 3 of 7 sample residents (Residents 1, 6, and 7) reviewed for accidents/incidents. Failure to conduct a thorough investigation to identify root cause(s) and consistently consider all potential contributing factors, such as last time checked on, last time toileted/changed, and other factors placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect, inappropriate corrective actions, and ineffective care planning that potentially impacted the overall well-being of the residents. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Incident Documentation and Investigation revised date 10/2022, showed the policy of this facility was to document and investigate investigations in order to protect residents from further incidents and a thorough investigation may require 2 phases of fact gathering. The policy showed that an incident report would be completed for falls, witnessed, unwitnessed or staff lowered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 1, 6, and 7) reviewed for incidents and care and services. The failure to ensure thorough documentation of incidents, care and services, and food preferences placed residents at risk for unmet needs, repeat occurrences of incidents, and diminished quality of life. The failure to obtain witness statements for incidents resulted in lost evidence regarding incidents that occurred in the facility making it impossible to ascertain what occurred. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), aftercare and rehabilitation after spinal fusion surgery. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 09/05/2024, the resident had severe cognitive impairment and needed supervision or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to include providing oral care of 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for ADL's. The failure to provide oral care placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 09/05/2024, the resident had severe cognitive impairment and needed supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene. In a phone interview on 09/26/2024 at 2:52 PM, Collateral Contact 1 stated staff were not brushing Resident 1's teeth, so they had to do it. Review of Resident 1's care plan, print date 09/26/2024, showed they were care planned to receive oral care twice daily, in the morning and at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, update and consistently implement the care plan to prevent accidents/falls for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failure to provide adequate supervision and implement appropriate interventions placed residents at risk for future falls, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled Fall Risk Overview, revised date 02/2020, showed it was the policy of this facility to evaluate each resident's fall risk in order to develop and implement care plan interventions that create a safe and secure environment where falls and injuries are minimized. The facility fall risk program included identification of residents at risk for falls, development of care plan interventions to minimize fall risk, implementation of fall risk interventions and evaluation of effectiveness of fall risk interventions. The policy indicated an individualized care plan was to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to use appropriate standards of infection control practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 2 and 3) observed during resident care. Failure to utilize appropriate hand hygiene and to provide incontinent care without staff contaminating the resident's environment placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and for living in a contaminated environment. Findings included . <RESIDENT 2> Resident 2 was admitted at the facility on 01/11/2023. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident was cognitively intact, and was incontinent of urine and bowels. In an observation on 09/26/2024 at 12:50 PM, Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was completing peri care (the process of washing the genital and rectal area) on Resident 2 and with the gloves they used to wash the resident's peri area (area in the body between the genital and rectal), which were contaminated gloves, staff touched the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY [NAME] Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident focused care through consistent monitoring, assessment and evaluation of the resident's condition to identify a change in condition for a suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) and to implement physician orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmet needs, hospitalization, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of McGreer's criteria (set of surveillance definitions used to identify infections in long-term care settings) showed the constitutional criteria for a UTI (a set of signs and symptoms that indicate a patient may have an infection, even if diagnostic testing has not confirmed it) included fever, acute change in mental and/or functional status and leukocytosis (high white blood cell count). Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include low back pain, chronic pain, cardiomyopathy (disease of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure timely physician visits (once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission) were completed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for physician visits. This failure placed residents at risk of being denied face-to-face contact with a physician, comprehensive reviews and physician assessments of their health and well-being. Findings included . Review of Resident 1's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include low back pain, chronic pain, cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle that makes it harder for the heart to pump blood to the rest of the body) and spondylosis (a condition that causes the spine to degenerate, resulting in abnormal wear on the cartilage and bones in the spine). Review of Resident 1's electronic health record (EHR) showed they were seen by a physician on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. Resident 1 was not seen by a physician again until [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported immediately, not longer than 2 hours after the allegation of abuse was made for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for abuse allegations or injury of unknown source. This failure placed Resident 1 and other residents at risk for potential continued abuse, unrecognized abuse, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility provided policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised date of 10/2022, showed a mandated reporter include facility employees, and mandated reporters must immediately report to the Abuse Hotline. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), oxygen dependence, and schizophrenia (a serious mental condition of a type involving a breakdown in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected during the facility's investigation phase to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) investigations reviewed for abuse when they allowed the staff member to continue to work with Resident 1 and other residents after an allegation of abuse. This failure placed all residents at risk for continued potential abuse from Staff E, Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC), and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised date of 10/2022, showed that all alleged incidents of abuse and injuries of unknown source are thoroughly investigated to determine what occurred and make necessary changes to the provision of care and services to prevent reoccurrences. The policy also showed that protecting the resident from further harm means keeping the resident safe by immediate suspension of the alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified and homelike dining experience in 1 of 3 dining rooms (East) during 1 of 3 dining observations for dignity witnessed when a resident was in respiratory distress (an abrupt change in a resident's breathing abilities) in the East dining room observed by other residents. These failures placed residents at risk for feelings of anxiety, fear, and concern. Findings included . In a continuous observation on 11/19/2023 from 12:56 PM until 1:04 PM, Resident 37 was seated in the dining room when a persistent coughing episode began. The resident was red faced and unable to stop coughing. Residents 7, 16, 52 and 119 were present at the same table eating their lunch. Staff AA, Registered Nurse (RN), came into the dining room to assess the resident and administer their inhaler (a device to administer a drug which is to be breathed in). At 1:15 PM, Resident 37 was asked how they were and when they went to answer, they began coughing continuously and a long thick clear secretion came out of their mouth. Resident 16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed and provided written information concerning the right to accept, refuse, or formulate an Advanced Directive (AD - legal documents reflecting a wide range of healthcare decisions and includes resident's wishes if they became incapacitated) for 4 of 6 residents (Resident 54, 172, 6, and 13) reviewed for ADs. The failure to offer assistance or choose to refuse to formulate an AD placed residents at risk of not having a Power of Attorney (POA - surrogate decision maker) when unable to make their own healthcare or financial decisions. Findings included . <RESIDENT 54> Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include dementia (a mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems). Review of Resident 54's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 11/14/2023, showed the resident did not have an AD or documentation written information on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure written notification of facility initiated transfer and/or discharge was completed for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 37, 59, 68, 219 and 44) reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility failed to ensure the transfer/discharge notice with all the required information was provided in a timely, practical manner upon an emergent transfer to the hospital. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not receiving accurate information related to resident's discharge, and potential for diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 37> Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the Resident 37's electronic medical record (EMR), showed no documentation the resident or to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (Ombudsman - a resident advocate) received written notification of the resident's transfer to the hospital. In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notification for transfer to the hospital for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 37, 59, 68, 219 and 44) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failed practice placed the resident or the resident's representative at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the facility's bed hold policy a resident was admitted to the hospital and did not allow an opportunity to the resident or their representative from making an informed bed hold decision. Findings included . <RESIDENT 37> Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's electronic medical record (EMR), showed no documentation the resident was offered or received a written notification of a bed hold. In an interview on 11/20/2023 at 8:43 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated there was no written notification of a bed hold was provided to Resident 37. <RESIDENT 59> Resident 59 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <RESIDENT 4> Resident 4 admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include paraplegia. According to the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/01/2023, they had limited range of motion (ROM) on one side of upper extremities (UE) and both sides of lower extremities (LE). They required extensive assistance with grooming and bathing. Review of the facility shower schedule, showed Resident 4 was to receive showers on Mondays and Thursdays. Review of Resident 4's 10/01/2023 to 10/20/2023, showed the resident received four showers in October (on 10/02/2023, 10/09/2023, 10/26/2023 and 10/30/2023), and four showers in November (on 11/09/2023, 11/13/2023 and 11/16/2023, and 11/20/2023). Resident 4 did not received showers as they preferred. In an interview on 11/22/2023 at 9:25AM, Staff W, NAC, stated showers were provided depending on the residents wishes and some residents wanted two to three times a week. Staff W said if a resident refuses bathing, it was documented and brought to the nurse's attention. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly provide professional standards of care and services for 5 of 6 residents (16, 21, 36 51, and 64) reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 36) reviewed for medication management. The facility failed to hold medications per physician orders, and to reassess abnormal blood pressure (BP) values, and notify the provider of abnormal findings, medication refusals and did not include, tubing maintenance, dressing changes, flushes on a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). This failed practice placed residents at risk for infection, medication complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's interact policy titled, Vital Signs, dated 2011, showed licensed nurses were responsible for immediately reporting Systolic blood pressures over 200 mmHG or less than 90 mmHG and diastolic blood pressures over 115 mmHG. <MEDICATION MANAGEMENT> RESIDENT 21 Resident 21 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 residents (Resident 3, 18, and 172) with limited range of motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services to increase their ROM or prevent further decrease in range of motion. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for further decline in their ROM. Findings Included . <RESIDENT 172> Resident 172 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include right femur fracture, dementia, fall, and abnormal gait and mobility. Review of Resident 172's provider orders showed that they were to have a wedge/hip abduction pillow to place between legs to prevent flexion and internal rotation of right knee, ordered on 11/15/2023. Review of Resident 172's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated November 2023 showed that the resident was to have wedge in place when resident was in bed and to document every shift, initiated 11/15/2023. Review of Resident 172's care plan showed that there were no focuses or interventions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to provide and supervise care as evidenced by information provided by 14 resident interviews (1, 4, 11, 16, 18, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36, 49, 55 , 64 and 171), and two-family interviews (3 and 6) and as evidenced by failed practice in other identified quality of life and quality of care areas. These failures placed residents at risk for potential harm related to anxiety, feelings of frustration and vulnerability, unmet care needs, negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT INTERVIEWS> RESIDENT 11 In an interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:04 AM, Resident 11 stated they have to wait up to an hour for help on weekends and evenings. RESIDENT 18 In an interview on 11/15/2023 at 10:40 AM, Resident 18 stated the facility needed more staff especially at night. The resident said when they want to get up, they have to wait to get out of bed and they felt like staff try to keep them in bed. The resident stated they have to wait longer because they are a mechanical lift.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses (LN) and Nursing Assistants Certified (NAC) had the appropriate competencies, skills sets and proficiencies to provide nursing and related services for each resident in accordance with the facility assessment when nursing staff failed to demonstrate the knowledge, skills and abilities to perform nursing services for 5 of 5 sampled staff (Staff J, AA, BB, CC & DD) reviewed for competent nursing staff. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1). Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was hired by the facility on 03/17/2023. Staff J's training records did not include documentation they were assessed to be competent to provide nursing services to the facility's resident population. 2) Staff AA, Registered Nurse (RN), was hired by the facility on 10/08/2018. Staff AA's training records did not include documentation they were assessed to be competent to provide nursing services to the facility's resident population. 3) Staff BB's,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that adequate monitors were in place for psychotropic medication management for 4 of 6 residents (6, 21, 37, and 172)reviewed for psychotropic medications. These failures placed residents at risk to receive unnecessary medications, possible side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled 'Behavior Management/Psychotropic Medication Overview', revised 10/2022 showed that Step 6 of the policy was that 'Risks associated with psychotropic medications still exist regardless of the indication for their use, therefore the requirements pertaining to psychotropic medications apply to the four categories of drugs (anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, and hypnotic) without exception. Step 13 showed that 'when a hypnotic [NAME] is ordered, resident's hours of sleep will be documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). When Trazodone is given for insomnia, hours of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system in which resident's records were complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized for 8 of 8 residents (4, 10, 18, 21, 37, 44 and 64) reviewed for accurate Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR). Failure to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate made it impossible to determine what care and services were provided, or should have been provided, and placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, undocumented/unresolved grievances, and for diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility staff job description titled, Medical Records, updated May 2015, showed the duties for medical records were. - to include chart audits on an ongoing basis for MDS assessment completion, summaries, weights, vital signs, physician orders using the facility audit form. - Evaluate medical records on an on-going basis for missing documents, charting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for one of two hallways (West Hall) and one of one residents tube feeding (Resident 44). The facility failed to ensure the staff used appropriate hand hygiene practices during meal tray pass, and during meal preparation in the kitchen. This failed place all residents and staff at risk for potential infection. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised October/2017 stated staff are required to use appropriate hand hygiene after each direct resident contact or contact with resident food. In a continuous observation and interview on 11/14/2023 at 12:00 PM, Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed to remove a resident lunch tray from the meal cart without performing hand hygiene. Staff H was observed to enter the resident's room, touch with their bare hand, items on the residents over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure responsible parties were notified timely for one of one resident (55) reviewed for incidents. This failure placed resident's representatives at risk of not being informed of resident status and potential for receiving less than optimal care. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled 'Incident documentation and investigation', last revised 10/2022 showed that step 8 of their policy is that the physician (provider) and family notification is documented. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include prostate cancer, bone cancer, paraplegia (paralysis of legs and lower body), and hospice (end of life) care. Resident 55's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that the resident was cognitively intact and that the resident required moderate to maximum assist with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident 55's progress note dated 11/04/2023 at 9:47 AM showed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 221) reviewed for allegations of abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to identify, report, and initiate timely interventions for an allegation of sexual abuse for eight hours after the allegation had been made by a resident. This failure to report to the required state agency, and law enforcement resulted in lack of timely investigations and placed residents at risk of being victims of unidentified and uninvestigated abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/exploitation, revised 10/2022, showed all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, and must report to law enforcement if there was a suspected incident of sexual abuse.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 221) reviewed for allegations of abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to initiate an investigation for an allegation of sexual abuse for eight hours after the allegation had been made by a resident and failed to complete a thorough investigation of sexual abuse. This failure to investigate timely and thoroughly placed residents at risk of being victims of unidentified and uninvestigated abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/exploitation, revised 10/2022, showed the investigation should begin as soon as the allegation was identified. The investigation should include interviews with all staff that worked on the shifts in the allegation occurred and shift prior and collect as much data as possible. Resident 221 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include post-surgical care for toe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 2 of 6 residents (Resident 172 and 44) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop and implement care plans for necessary supplies (a positioning wedge/pillow and pressure relieving boots) placed the residents at risk for possible adverse effects and related complications. Findings included . <RESIDENT 172> Resident 172 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include right femur (upper leg bone) fracture, dementia (a mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems), fall and abnormal gait and mobility. Review of Resident 172's admission 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 11/12/2023, showed they were dependent on staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL - dressing, transfers, bed mobility, walking/locomotion, bathing personal hygiene, toileting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were revised to reflect changes or current status of three of six (2, 18, and 23) residents reviewed for care plans. These failures placed residents at risk of less than optimal care, staff not knowing how to properly care for a resident, a decreased quality of life with potential for harm. Findings included . <RESIDENT 2> Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses included congetive heart failure (CHF-chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), unspecified dementia, and supplemental oxygen use. In a review of Resident 2's care plan dated 12/19/2020 and most recently updated 09/23/2023 showed a care plan focus for alteration in respiratory status related to of CHF, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and dependence on oxygen. One of the interventions on the care plan included that Resident 2 preferred to have their oxygen condenser in the bathroom to minimize noise,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met for 1of 1 sampled residents (Resident 36) sampled for intravenous (IV - into the vein) medication administration. The facility failed to ensure the resident's antibiotic (medication to treat an infection) IV medication was administered by a nurse that had the appropriate certification to manage IV lines and IV medication administration. This failure placed the resident at risk for complications, a worsened infection, delay in healing, and adverse outcomes. Findings include . Review of the facility policy titled, Administration of an intermittent infusion (IV therapy), revised 06/01/2021, stated that IV therapy was only to be performed by a licensed nurse according to state law and facility policy. The nurse was responsible and accountable for obtaining and maintaining competency with IV therapy within their scope of practice. Review of the facility job description titled, Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for 1 of 1sampled residents (Resident 23) reviewed for vision. Failure to ensure the resident received assistance with obtaining corrective lenses left the resident at risk for unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 23 most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), unspecified urinary incontinence, and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). Review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 10/29/2023, showed the resident's vision was adequate. Review of Resident 23's progress notes from 11/15/2022 through 11/16/2023, showed the resident complained of blurred vision on 12/22/2022, and an eye exam was scheduled on 1/17/2023. Resident 23 was referred for eye surgery on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (13 and 37), reviewed for use and care of a catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), received appropriate care and services, to minimize the risk of associated urinary tract infections. This failure placed the resident at risk for discomfort, loss of dignity, continued urinary tract infections and other health complications. Findings included . Per the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice 10th Ed. ([NAME], 2014), infectious organisms can move into the bladder along the outside of any urinary catheter, and the catheter bag (a urine collection bag attached to the catheter) should be kept off the floor (and other unclean surfaces), to prevent bacteria from entering the bladder (pg. 781-782). The facility's Indwelling Urinary Catheters Policy, most recently dated 04/2018, read, in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to ensure an indwelling catheter is not used for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had an effective system in place for monitoring resident weights for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 64) reviewed for nutritional status and weight loss. The failure to accurately monitor, assess and document resident weights placed residents at risk for unrecognized weight loss, nutrition-related complications and for diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition and Hydration, revised 07/2018, included: - Residents who showed an unexpected significant weight change were assessed by the facility dietician and Resident Care Manager (RCM). - The resident's weight would be monitored weekly until stable for four weeks following admission and monthly thereafter if stable. - The RCM would monitor weights and request a reweigh if the resident's weight varied by five pounds (lbs.) or more (plus or minus) from the previous weight. - Residents showing a significant weight variance (5% in 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for respiratory care and services were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure the concentrator was set to the ordered dosage and failed to ensure oxygen tubing was appropriately maintained, changed regularly, and dated. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving care and services that were not physician ordered, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF-chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), unspecified dementia, and supplemental oxygen use. In a review of Resident 2's care plan for oxygen use, most recently revised 09/25/2023, showed that resident used oxygen via nasal cannula (a device that gives you additional oxygen through your nose) at two liters continuously to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the hemodialysis (was one way to treat advanced kidney failure) center for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 44) reviewed for hemodialysis (HD) services. The failure to consistently and accurately complete resident's pre and post dialysis assessments and lack of consistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center about what occurred during HD, placed the resident at risk for unidentified medical complications and other potential/negative health outcomes. Findings included . Resident 44 most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included dependence on renal dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum), atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that makes your heartbeat irregular and hypertension (high blood pressure). In a review of Resident 44's dialysis care plan, revised 05/05/2023, showed the resident received HD on Tuesdays, Thursday.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual Nurse Aide Certified (NAC) performance reviews were completed for three of three employees (BB, CC, and DD ) files reviewed who had been employed longer than 1 year. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of these NACs and the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Staff BB was hired on 08/26/2022. Review of Staff BB's employee file showed there was no current employee evaluation done. There was no evidence the evaluator completed this evaluation nor if it was reviewed/discussed with Staff BB. Staff CC was hired on 08/25/2022. Review of Staff CC's employee file showed there was no current employee evaluation done. There was no evidence the evaluator completed this evaluation nor if it was reviewed/discussed with Staff CC. Staff DD was hired on 08/25/2022. Review of Staff DD's employee file showed there was no current employee evaluation done. There was no evidence the evaluator completed this evaluation nor if it was reviewed/discussed with Staff DD. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were timely followed up on for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 37 and 64) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving an inaccurate dosing of medication, adverse side effects, and the risk of receiving a medication longer than medically necessary. Findings included . <RESIDENT 37> Resident 37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of depression, dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety and failure to thrive. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 09/21/2023, showed a recommendation to assess for a required gradual dose reduction of Diazepam 2.5 mg, an anti-anxiety medication that may cause sedation and contribute to falls. The resident's provider disagreed with the pharmacy recommendation and wrote no changes. The patient is (unintelligible word) stable. The provider provided no rationale as to why the recommendation was rejected. <RESIDENT 64> Resident 64 admitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 1 of 1 (Resident 10) residents reviewed for dental care. This failure placed Resident 10 and all other residents at risk for unmet dental needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included hypertension, atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that makes your heartbeat irregular), and dental caries (loss of tooth substance (enamel and dentine). In a review of Resident 10's care plan, revised 08/16/2023, showed a care plan focus for dental care. The care plan showed that Resident 10 had dental caries, several missing teeth, and that resident had declined to have their remaining teeth removed. Interventions included to coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed and as ordered. In an interview and observation on 11/15/2023 at 12:53 PM Resident 10 stated their teeth did not bother them and they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an in-service training program ensure 3 of 3 Nursing Assistant's (BB,CC and DD) reviewed for the required 12 hour of nurse aide training per year. The failure to ensure Nursing Assistants Certified (NACs) received 12 hour per year in-service training placed residents at risk for potential unmet care needs. Findings included: Review of Staff BB, CC, and DD's employee file showed each NAC did not have documented evidence of 12 hours of in-servicing. Review of the in-service records showed the facility failed to document how long the in-service lasted or the time it started. In an interview on 11/22/2023 at 10:29 AM, Staff A, Administrator stated they were aware the 12 hours were not completed for the NAC's but had not had the chance to put the issue through Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) yet. The Administrator stated the facility would develop a plan to ensure the required in-service hours would occur. Refer to WAC 388-97-1680 (2)(a-c) .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$131,131 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-05-22
  • $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-05-22
  • $107,120 — penalty dated 2023-11-22
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-06 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Pilot Butte Rehabilitation CenterBend, OR 1 of 5Puyallup Post AcutePuyallup, WA 2 of 5Park Rose Care CenterTacoma, WA 2 of 5Regency AlbanyAlbany, OR 3 of 5Kauai Care CenterWaimea, HI 3 of 5Laurel Hill Nursing CenterGrants Pass, OR 3 of 5Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab CenterHermiston, OR 3 of 5Sharon Care CenterCentralia, WA 3 of 5View Ridge Care CenterEverett, WA 4 of 5Arlington Health And RehabilitationArlington, WA 4 of 5Regency Care Center At MonroeMonroe, WA 4 of 5Regency FlorenceFlorence, OR 5 of 5Good Samaritan Health Care CtrYakima, WA 5 of 5Mt Baker Care CenterBellingham, WA 5 of 5Regency At NorthpointeSpokane, WA 5 of 5Regency At The ParkCollege Place, WA 5 of 5Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick, WA 5 of 5Regency Care Of Central OregonBend, OR 5 of 5Regency Care Of Rogue ValleyGrants Pass, OR 5 of 5Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterGresham, OR 5 of 5Regency Harmony House Rehab & NursingBrewster, WA 5 of 5Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOlympia, WA 5 of 5Regency OmakOmak, WA 5 of 5Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing CentPrineville, OR 5 of 5Regency Redmond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRedmond, OR 5 of 5Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing CenterWenatchee, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STROUD, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF33%since 06/16/2020
REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2020
BEDDOE, MARVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2020
CHU, CALEBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2023
MOFFITT, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/21/2023
RAPP, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2016
OMNICARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2013
REGENCY COUPEVILLE PROPERTIES I LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2020
CLAY, JAMESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$891K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 18%Other / private 29%

This home reported $891K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$464per resident / day
operating cost
$14,119per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$417per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505309. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next