Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 204 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 78.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.25 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free from accident hazards related to mechanical lift transfers for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 4, 15 and 18) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 15 sustaining a hip fracture which required surgical intervention. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including pain in her/his lower legs. Resident 15's [DATE] Annual MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. Resident 15 required the assistance of two-persons using a mechanical lift for transfers. An [DATE] 7:21 AM Fall Investigation revealed Resident 15 fell during a mechanical lift transfer because staff were unable to turn the mechanical lift which resulted in the mechanical lift tipping over and the resident landing on her/his right side. Resident 15 complained of pain to her/his right leg and shoulder and was sent to the hospital. A witness statement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than five percent. There were 4 errors in 29 opportunities resulting in a 13.79 percent error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 11/2019 with diagnoses including seizures and multiple sclerosis. A 2/22/2025 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 3 had a BIMS score of three which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident 3's 2/2025 provider orders indicated Metoprolol Tartrate 25mg (a blood pressure medication) was to be given as 12.5mg twice daily with instructions to hold the medication for systolic blood pressure (top number in a blood pressure reading) below 110. Resident 3's provider orders indicated potassium chloride extended release 20meq (a supplement) was to be given one time a day with instructions to swallow whole, do not crush or chew, and do not allow to dissolve in the mouth. During an observation of medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not expired for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms and 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for lack of medication efficacy and adverse reactions from expired medications. Findings include: The facility Medication Storage In The Facility policy, revised July 2021, indicated expiration dates on all medications were to be checked prior to administration, no expired medications were to be administered, and all expired medications were to be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility. During an observation of the 400-hall medication cart on 4/8/25 at 3:52 PM, the following were found: - One bottle of Geri Dryl 25mg tablets with an expiration date of 9/2024. - One bottle of ASA 81mg tablets with an expiration date of 8/2024. - One bottle of calcium 500mg + D 500mg tablets with an expiration date of 12/2024. - One bottle of melatonin 1mg tablets with an expiration date of 3/2025. - One bottle of acid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to store food in a manner to prevent spoilage in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary practices. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: The facility's Food Safety and Sanitation Policy and Procedure dated 2023 indicates: -All time and temperature control for safety foods should be labeled, covered and dated when stored; and -Perishable foods should be used prior to the use by date on the package. On 4/7/25 at 10:06 AM during a tour of the facility's Kitchen, the following was observed in the walk-in refrigerator: -a plastic container labeled, chicken noodle - use by 4/5; -a plastic container labeled, rice prep - use by 4/6; -a one-quart container of sauerkraut labeled, expires 4/4; and -two unlabeled and undated trays containing multiple prepared beverage cups: 28 cups of milk and 6 cups of apple juice. On 4/7/25 at 10:06 AM Staff 5 (Dietary Manager) acknowledged the items should not be in the refrigerator past their use by dates and should be thrown away. Staff 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#40) reviewed for vision. This placed resident at risk for lack of visual care needs. Findings include: Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 2020 with a diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance. Resident 12's 1/6/25 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident had vision impairment and her/his BIMS score was 5 which indicated a severe cognitive impairment. The resident's required substantial/maximal assistance with a helper completing more than half of the effort. On 4/7/25 at 11:55 AM Resident 12 was observed without eyeglasses, in bed coloring. Resident 12 stated she/he was worried about her/his eyeglasses and said they were missing. The surveyor looked around on Resident 12's bed and bedside table and no eyeglasses were visible. Resident 12 was observed to not have worn eyeglasses on the following dates and times: -4/7/25 at 10:28 AM and 11:55 AM; -4/8/25 at 8:08 AM, 9:26 AM, 12:39 PM and 2:23 PM; -4/9/25 at 7:41 AM.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for skin assessments and monitoring for 2 of 2 residents (#s 27 and 40) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and skin breakdown. Findings include: The facility's revised 4/2018 Skin at Risk Program Overview Policy indicated the Skin at Risk Program was based on the nursing process and included identification of residents at risk for skin breakdown, care plan developed to prevent skin breakdown, implementation of care plan interventions, to evaluate and monitor interventions for skin. 1. Resident 27 admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses chronic pain and depression. Resident 27's physician order, start date on 10/21/23, directed staff to check her/his skin and indicate if a new condition was present. If a new condition was present staff were to document a progress note and initiate a skin documentation form. Resident 27's 2/25/25 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 11 which indicated a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate communication occurred between the facility and the dialysis provider, ensure the residents care plan and physician orders were followed for fluid restriction for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#69) reviewed for dialysis. This paced residents at risk for lack of communication with the dialysis center and fluid overload. Findings include: Resident 69 admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including heart failure and ESRD (end stage kidney disease). The facility's Dialysis Policy revised on 3/2024 indicated the following: -Licensed nurses were to complete the Pre and Post-dialysis assessments with each dialysis visit. -The licensed nurse are to ensure the Dialysis Communication form were completed and special instructions/orders were implemented. a. A 3/3/25 physician order indicated staff were to follow the dialysis flow sheet protocol every day shift every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. A review of the Dialysis Communication form revealed the following: The 3/4/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual and physical abuse by other residents for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 12, 29, 128 and 279) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for mental anguish and abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's revised 10/2022 Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation Policy and Procedures revealed the purpose of the policy was to define how the facility will prevent, identify, report and investigate abuse. Sexual abuse was defined as any form of non-consensual contact including unwanted or inappropriate touching. The facility must evaluate whether the resident has the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Physical abuse included hitting, slapping, pinching, striking with an object and shoving. 1. Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 2020 with a diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance. Resident 12's 7/6/24 Quarterly MDS revealed, Resident 12 had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 11 and 40) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for a lack of personal hygiene and loss of dignity. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including weakness and kidney disease. A 4/4/25 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 11 had a BIMS score of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for grooming. A review of Resident 11's 3/13/25 through 4/10/25 health record revealed CNA staff documented grooming was completed daily, a shower was provided six times, and the resident refused a shower two times. Random observations from 4/7/25 through 4/11/25 revealed Resident 11 had long white hairs hanging approximately two inches from her/his chin in multiple locations. On 4/10/25 at 2:42 PM, Staff 28 (CNA) stated she was not sure if Resident 11 had long chin hairs. She stated grooming for residents occurred at least…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure narcotics were administered according to physician's orders for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for medication errors. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: On 3/21/24 a concern was received by the State Survey Agency (SSA) which alleged Resident 1 was given an additional dose of the narcotic Oxycodone. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022, with diagnoses including a fractured leg and dementia. Resident 1's 3/2024 signed physician orders revealed she/he was to be administered an Oxycodone 5 mg tablet by mouth every eight hours for pain. A review of Resident 1's 3/2024 MAR revealed on 3/20/24 Resident 1 was given Oxycodone 5 mg at 6:00 AM, 2:00 PM and 10:00 PM. On 3/20/24 at 9:00 PM, Staff 9 (CMA) and Staff 10 (CMA/CNA) counted the narcotics for Resident 1 and discovered there was a missing Oxycodone tablet. Staff 9 stated she had accidentally given Resident 1 an extra dose of 5 mg Oxycodone. Staff 9 and Staff 10 informed the charge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and proper food handling practices were followed to prevent cross contamination in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness and unappetizing meals. Findings include: 1. On 11/13/23 at 10:56 AM the following observations were made regarding dry food storage: -Three undated containers of pasta; -One undated container of croutons; and -One undated container of rice. On 11/13/23 at 11:13 AM Staff 33 (Cook) stated dry food containers were not dated. When questioned, Staff 33 was unable to say specifically how long they have had the dry foods. On 11/15/23 at 12:05 PM Staff 35 (Dietary Manager) confirmed all food should be dated. 2. On 11/15/23 at 11:39 AM Staff 34 (Cook) was observed preparing and plating lunch with no hairnet. On 11/15/23 at 12:05 PM Staff 35 (Dietary Manager) stated staff were to wear hairnets anytime they were in the kitchen area. Staff 35 confirmed Staff 34 was not wearing a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$46,907 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $46,907 — penalty dated 2023-11-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR