No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sharon Care Center

1509 Harrison Avenue, Centralia, WA 98531 · For profit - Partnership · 42 certified beds · (360) 736-0112 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 736-0112 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Sep 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1220 W 1st St · (360) 736-9355 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1200 Harrison Ave · (360) 807-2014 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.6 mi
1129 Harrison Ave · (360) 330-0884 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1822 Van Wormer St · (360) 736-1919 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1209 N Scheuber Rd · (360) 736-9270

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.6%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.5%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms65.3%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.1%12.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control37.4%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.6%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.9%13.4%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 277 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
25.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.79U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.46hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 25.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.7%CMS range 60.5–72.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.9–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge25.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge16.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 5.0–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-12)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide toileting assistance to 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. This failure placed residents at risk of skin infections, low dignity, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.1) Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/07/2025, documented the resident required assistance with toileting and was moderately cognitively impaired. Record Review of Resident 1's facility investigation, dated 10/15/2025, documented, On the morning of 10/15/2025, two CNA's [Certified Nursing Assistants] entered resident room to adjust her bedding in order to pull her up. Upon rolling resident, dried BM [Bowel Movement] was found on the sheets, on her buttocks and brief was stuck to her. The assumption was that she was not checked and changed during the night. In an interview on 11/18/2025 at 10:17 AM, Staff D, CNA, said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated when opened in 1 of 3 kitchen refrigerators, and in 1 of 2 nourishment refrigerators (East Hall) reviewed for food storage. The facility also failed to keep an accurate temperature log for 1 of 2 nourishment refrigerators (East Hall). These failures placed residents at risk for food borne illness, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . During an observation on 09/08/2025 at 9:12 AM, the kitchen refrigerator on the left, was observed with the following expired, opened items: 1. Plastic Tupperware container of Parmesan Cheese- labeled with use by date of 09/02/20252. Plastic Tupperware container of Jam - labeled with ineligible use by date During an observation on 09/09/2025 at 9:23 AM, the nourishment refrigerator on East Hall, was observed with the following expired, opened items: 1. Fruit cup- labeled with use by date of 09/03/2025 2. Six undated fruit cups During an observation on 09/09/2025 at 9:25 AM, the nourishment refrigerator on East Hall was observed with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) test (a rating scale used to assess the severity of involuntary movements that sometimes develop as a side effect of treatment with antipsychotic medications [drugs used primarily to treat symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions]) for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 59) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse medication side-effects, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medications [drugs that affect a person's thoughts, emotions, and behaviors], updated 01/01/2023, showed, .If a resident is on antipsychotic medications when they are admitted to the facility, an AIMS test will be performed upon admit, every 6 months, and PRN [as needed].Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis to include dementia with agitation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) was completed within the required timeframe for 1 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 59) reviewed for resident admission assessments. Failure to complete the admission MDS within the required timeframe placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (a guide to facilitate accurate and effective resident assessment practices in long-term care facilities), Version 1.19.1, effective October 1, 2024, showed the admission MDS assessment must be completed no later than the 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date plus 13 calendar days). Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 59's Electronic Health Record, on 09/10/2025 at 2:09 PM, showed Resident 59's admission MDS was still In Progress,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment was reviewed, completed and submitted for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 16 and Resident 4) reviewed for PASRR. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included… 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include anxiety (a common emotional state characterized by feelings of unease) and depression (a common mental health condition characterized by persistent of low mood or sadness). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 06/17/2025, indicated Resident 16 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 16's PASRR, dated 07/23/2024, indicated Resident 16 had a Mood Disorder (a mental health condition that primarily affects a person's emotional state); however, “No Level II evaluation indicated at this time due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to accurately reflect care needs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for accidents related to falls. This failure placed residents at risk for subsequent falls, injuries, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis to include repeated falls. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 06/16/2025, documented Resident 3 was cognitively intact.Record review of the facility's Resident Incident Log, dated August 2025, showed Resident 3 had a fall on 08/12/2025 and 08/24/2025. Record review of Resident 3's fall investigation, dated 08/12/2025, Notes documented, .The Care Plan has been updated: Cue and encourage him to use call light and wait for help.Record review of CONCLUSION FALLS: [Resident 3] 08/12/2025 0530 AM, undated, documented, .The Care Plan has been updated: Cue and encourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain daily weights per physician's orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for quality of care. The facility also failed to check for PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter line used for long-term intravenous (IV) access to administer medications) line blood return for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 23) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, potential complications and a diminished quality of life.Weights Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include congestive heart failure. The admission /Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 06/20/2025, documented Resident 5 was severely cognitively impaired.Record review of Resident 5's physician's order, dated 06/14/2025, documented, Daily Weights for one week and the weights once per week unless ordered otherwise by provider every day shift for Weight until 06/19/2025 18:00 AND…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete pain assessments every shift for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 6) reviewed for pain. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses to include vascular dementia (a type of cognitive decline caused by damage to the blood vessels in the brain), fibromyalgia (chronic condition characterized by widespread muscle pain) and chronic pain syndrome. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 05/02/2025, documented Resident 6 was severely cognitively impaired.Record review of Resident 6's Nightingale Pain Assessment: Verbal & Non-verbal, dated 08/25/2025, documented Resident 6 occasionally experienced pain and staff assessment for pain should have been conducted.Record review of Resident 6's Nightingale Pain Assessment: Verbal & Non-verbal dated 07/18/2025, documented Resident 6 was unable to verbalize if she had pain and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment was maintained for 2 of 7 rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) reviewed for environment, when sharps containers (a puncture-resistant, leak-proof container designed to safely collect and dispose of sharp medical instruments that can puncture or cut skin, like needles, syringes, and lancets) were observed above the full line. This failure placed residents, visitors, and staff at risk for injury, potential exposure to diseases, and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . In an observation on 09/08/2025 at 11:07 AM, the red sharps container mounted on the wall inside of room [ROOM NUMBER], date written on container 09/16/24, showed sharps instruments inside of the container above the fill line that said, do not fill above this line. The top lid, where the sharps instruments were placed in the container for disposal, was observed to not open all the way as sharps instruments in the full container would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and/or have procedures in place to assist with completing advance directives (AD), and obtaining and maintaining Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) documentation for 4 of 9 sampled residents (1, 24, 26 & 30) reviewed for ADs. This failure place residents at risk for losing their right to have healthcare preferences and decisions honored and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's policy entitled, Advanced Directives, dated 08/01/2018, indicated, I. Upon admission, we will determine whether a resident has an advance directive, if they do not have and advance directive we will determine whether the residents or resident representative wishes to formulate and advanced directive. II. Information will be provided to the residents or resident representative about the right to refuse medical and surgical treatment and formulate an advanced directive. Including the facility policy on advance directive and applicable state law…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for 2 of 4 sampled residents (3 & 288) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's undated policy entitled, Devices/Enablers Policy and Procedure, documented .Nursing Staff will also obtain a physician order for the device/enabler. 1) Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/05/2024, documented Resident 3 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 09/09/2024 at 10:50 AM, Resident 3 was observed lying in bed on their left side with quarter length bed rails on left and right sides of the bed. At 3:17 PM, Resident 3 was observed lying in bed on their back with quarter length bed rails on left and right sides of the bed. Review of Resident 3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not show a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the Notice Before Transfer was sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 for 1 sampled resident (26) reviewed for transfer notice requirements. This failure placed residents at risk of loss of added protection from being inappropriately transferred or discharged from the facility. Findings included . Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure exacerbation and physical deconditioning. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/24/2024, documented Resident 26 was alert and oriented. Record review of resident's electronic health records documented Resident 26 was transferred to and admitted to a local hospital on [DATE]. On 09/11/2024 at 2:01 PM, when asked if a Notice of Transfer for Resident 26 was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, Staff A, Administrator, said he would check whether the notice was sent.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed accurately to reflect a resident's oral/dental status for 1 of 1 sampled resident (21) reviewed for assessment accuracy. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Admission/Medicare - 5 day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/30/2024, documented Resident 21 was severely cognitively impaired, did not have tooth fragments or broken natural teeth, had no mouth pain, and was able to be examined. Record review of the Dietitian Consulting Services - Nutrition Assessment, dated 07/29/2024, documented, natural teeth in poor shape. Record review of a Nutrition/Dietary progress note, dated 07/30/2024, documented, .teeth in poor shape. On 09/09/2024 at 10:19 AM, Resident 21's mouth was observed to have missing upper teeth, and lower teeth had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for 1 of 4 sampled residents (6) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's undated policy entitled, Devices/Enablers Policy and Procedure, documented Use of the device/enabler will be appropriately care planned and added to the resident's [NAME]. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 06/12/2024, documented Resident 6 was severely cognitively impaired. On 09/09/2024 at 10:39 AM, Resident 6's bed was observed with the left side against the wall and a mat on the floor the full length of the bed along the right side. At 11:38 AM, Resident 6 was observed sitting up in a wheelchair in her room with the left side of the bed against the wall. Review of Resident 6's Electronic Health Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of (ADLs) care was provided for dependent residents including nail care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (5) reviewed for ADLs. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the care and assistance needed for which they were unable to perform themselves. Findings included . The facility's policy entitled, Nail Care, dated 01/01/2024, indicated I. Nail care which we considered a part of personal hygiene/grooming and is provided by the certified nursing assistant if the resident is not diabetic, and the nails are not severe or complicated. II. If the resident is diabetic the nail care will be done by the licensed nurse due to being higher risk. III. The resident nails are checked for cleanliness and length as a standard of care in grooming/hygiene for the certified nursing assistant and cleaned as needed and nail care is offered. Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) agreement in a manner of which the resident and/or representative understood for 1 of 3 sampled residents (25) reviewed for arbitration agreement. This failure placed residents at risk of losing legal protections, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, lack of understanding of the legal document signed, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Optional Voluntary Arbitration Agreement documented, 5. Right to Rescind this Agreement. You may rescind this Agreement to arbitrate within thirty (30) days after signing it by giving written notice of your withdrawal to the Facility . Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The Admission/Medicare - 5 day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/13/2024, documented Resident 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices are being maintained including proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and hand hygiene for 2 of 8 sampled residents (26 & 30) reviewed for infection prevention and control. These failures placed residents at risk of communicable infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's Employee Training on Infection Prevention and Control policy, dated 11/01/2018, documented staff trainings and education regarding infection prevention and control included hand hygiene and use of PPE. 1) On 09/10/2024 at 1:58 PM, Staff F, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), was observed providing care for Resident 26. Staff F took off her gloves, opened Resident 26's door and proceed to retrieve gloves from the isolation cart located outside the room. Staff F then returned into the room, put on the new pair of gloves and continued to provide resident care. When asked about the process for doffing PPE between care, Staff F said she should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-21 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure mail delivery was provided on Saturdays for residents receiving mail via the US Postal Service for 4 of 5 sampled residents (7, 12, 19 & 246) reviewed for communication with privacy. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving their mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The Nursing Facility admission Agreement, dated 09/2013, documented, Each resident has a right to . send and promptly receive mail . On 07/19/2023 at 10:55 AM, during a Resident Council group interview, Resident 7 said there was activity staff that worked on Saturdays, but no mail was delivered on Saturday. The residents got Saturday's mail delivered on Monday. Resident 12, Resident 19 and Resident 246 also said there was no mail delivery on Saturdays. At 12:01 PM, Staff H, Activity Director, said mail delivered on Saturdays by the post office was taken by the post office to the assisted living side of the facility and put in a locked area until Monday. At 12:59 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared, stored, and served in a sanitary manner when the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free from dust and debris, clean dishes and utensils were stored in a clean manner, and opened foods were not labeled and/or dated as required for all 42 facility residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. These failures placed all residents at risk for food-borne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 07/17/2023 at 9:06 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, crumbs, grease, and debris were observed throughout the kitchen. In the dry food storage, a bag of stored food was on the floor. In the freezer, several eggrolls are noted on the floor. The hood had visible grease build-up and dust. A rack with clean dishes was in a high traffic area and had washcloths mixed in with the glasses. Several spices were noted without an open date. On 07/19/2023 at 2:10 PM, the kitchen was observed with Staff N, Dietary Manager. Four dented food cans were identified. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a urinary catheter (foley catheter, a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag), received appropriate care and services to minimize the risk of associated urinary infections for 4 of 5 sampled residents (10, 36, 24 & 1), and failed to ensure hand hygiene and glove changes were performed when indicated in the kitchen during tray line service by 1 of 3 sampled kitchen staff (Staff 0) reviewed for infection prevention and control. These failures placed the residents at risk for infections, medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included <Hand Hygiene> On 07/19/2023 at 11:34 AM, Staff O, Dietary Cook, was observed preparing the lunch meal. No hand hygiene was observed when Staff O started prepping the meal. Staff O was observed gathering items needed for the meal with her bare hands. At 11:40 AM, Staff O was observed ready to serve the lunch meal. Staff O…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed and provided consent before administering a psychotropic (mind altering) medication for 4 of 6 sampled residents (5, 12, 32 & 39) reviewed for right to be informed and make treatment decisions. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 06/29/2023, documented Resident 5 was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 01/25/2023, documented Resident 5 was prescribed Sertraline (an antidepressant). A physician's order, dated 06/10/2023, documented Resident 5 was prescribed Risperidone (an antipsychotic medication). Resident 5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) did not show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 4 of 14 sampled residents (39, 5, 8 & 36) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 06/17/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 07/12/2023, documented the resident was ordered Macrobid, an antibiotic medication used to treat UTI's. Resident 39's July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented, Macrobid oral capsule . give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for UTI for 7 days. The MAR documented the medication was administered from 07/12/2023 to 07/18/2023. Resident 39's Comprehensive Care Plan did not address the resident had a UTI. On 07/17/2023 at 10:24 AM, Resident 39 said she was currently being treated for a UTI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained and free from hazards related to unsecured and/or unsupervised chemicals and/or tools for 1 of 1 rooms under construction (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]) and 1 of 2 shower rooms (West Hall) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable accidents and injuries, negative health outcome, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Unsecured Tools> On 07/17/2023 at 10:05 AM, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have the carpet removed with no flooring on the floor, the window was cracked open, and a fan on the floor was running. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a bucket of adhesive with the lid secured on the floor with a scraper tool/trowel spatula on top of the bucket with sharp edges. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a wheeled work cart with tools on the cart including a box cutters with a blade in the tool, plyers, and an Ace brand sharp scraper in the room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting the mind) medications by failing to monitor for medication side effects, behaviors, and/or placing a stop date of 14 days for psychotropic as needed medications for 6 of 8 sampled residents (9, 15, 39, 5, 12 & 32) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medication. These failures placed residents at risk for medical complications, receiving unnecessary medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Monitoring for Behavior/Medication Side Effects> 1) Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental and behavioral disorder that develops from experiencing a traumatic event). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool), dated 06/15/2023, documented the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated, assessed and a physician order was obtained for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled residents (24) reviewed for clinically appropriate self administration of medications. This failure placed residents at risk for medication errors, adverse medication interactions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy entitled, Self-Medication Administration, undated, documented, Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. The policy documented, An assessment shall be done on the resident that will demonstrate the knowledge of indications for use and appropriate dose of this medication. The resident will also demonstrate the ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain, provide, and/or assist with completing Advance Directives (AD) for 1 of 6 sampled residents (7) reviewed for AD. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 05/25/2023, documented Resident 7 was cognitively intact. A review of the Resident 7's medical record did not show documentation of an AD. On 07/21/2023 at 11:43 AM, Staff F, Social Services, said they only request an AD when a resident was admitted . Staff F said Resident 7 had been in the facility a while. Staff F said they reviewed the AD at every care conference. Staff F said there was not an AD in Resident's 7 medical record and was unsure if they requested Resident 7's AD. At 11:46 AM, Staff B, Registered Nurse and Director of Nursing Services, said the facility did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) and/or a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was issued timely, at least two calendar days before Medicare services ended, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (33) reviewed for SNF ABN and NOMNC notification. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk for not having adequate information to make financial decisions related to a continued stay in the facility and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A medical record review showed Resident 33 had a Medicare Part A Skilled Services episode start date of 05/23/2023, and a last covered day of Part A service on 06/23/2023. After 06/23/2023, Resident 33 remained as a resident in the facility. Record review of Resident 33's SNF ABN documented Resident 33 was provided and signed the SNF ABN on 06/23/2023, the same as the last covered day of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a system in place to resolve grievances (a resident concern or complaint) promptly for 1 of 2 sampled residents (7) reviewed for grievances. This failure paced residents at risk for unmet care needs, not being heard and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 05/25/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, and did not have a plan to return to the community. Resident 7's comprehensive care plan, dated 05/24/2023, documented Resident 7 would like to stay at the facility long-term. Interventions included the facility would periodically check with Resident 7 to verify no change in the discharge plan, and staff would encourage Resident 7 to decorate her room to make it more homelike. On 07/17/2023 at 2:14 PM, Resident 7 said she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders and consents were obtained for 2 of 7 sampled residents (1 & 36) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's policy, Devices/Enablers Policy and Procedure, undated, documented, The nursing staff will then inform the resident and responsible party of the risks/benefits of the device and will obtain an informed consent for the device. If the resident or responsible party are not in agreement with the device/enabler, the device/enabler will not be placed . Nursing Staff will also obtain a physician order for the device/enabler. 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The Medicare/5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/06/2023, documented Resident 1 was moderately cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 1's Electronic Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written bed-hold notice was provided to the resident or resident's representative at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 sampled residents (8) reviewed for bed-hold notification. This failure placed residents and resident representatives at risk of not being informed regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/30/2023, documented Resident 8 was cognitively intact. Resident 8's electronic medical record documented a transfer to the hospital on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. The electronic medical record did not show a documentation of a bed-hold notice for the transfer. On 07/20/2023 at 10:41 AM, Staff D, Resident Care Manger and Registered Nurse, said a bed-hold notice was sent with the resident at the time of discharge to the hospital. Staff D said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessment data was encoded and transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required timeframe for 1 of 2 sampled residents (30) reviewed for resident assessments. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 05/25/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 30's progress notes, dated 04/25/2023, documented Resident 30 was discharged to home. Resident 30's discharge MDS assessment showed the MDS was not submitted. On 07/21/2023 at 9:19 AM, Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse and MDS Coordinator, said the Registered Nurse (RN) did not sign off Resident 30's discharge MDS. The MDS did not get submitted as a result. Staff G said they have no formal process to ensure the facility was submitting the MDS. Staff G…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected resident care needs for 2 of 14 sampled residents (10 & 32) reviewed for care plan revisions. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/18/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from two staff with activities of daily living, and used an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident 10's urinary care plan, dated 05/23/2023, documented Resident 10 required a foley catheter (flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for retention issues. Resident 10's urinary care plan documented catheter care would be performed according to facility protocol. Resident 10's progress notes documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bowel protocol was initiated per physician's orders and when needed for 1 of 7 sampled residents (12) reviewed for quality of care related to bowel management. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, change in health status, increased pain and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The significant change Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 05/02/2023, documented Resident 12 was cognitively intact. Resident 12's physician's order, dated 01/24/2023, documented Milk of Magnesium (MOM, a laxative) 1200 MG (milligram)/15 ML (milliliter) by mouth every 24 hours as needed for constipation if no BM (bowel movement) x 3 days or at resident's request. Resident 12's physician order, dated 01/24/2023, documented, Dulcolax (a laxative) Suppository 10 MG insert 1 suppository rectally every 96 hours as needed for constipation every 4 days if MOM not effective.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with an indwelling urinary catheter (a small flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) had a valid medical diagnosis and a complete provider order for 1 of 5 sampled residents (8) reviewed for catheter use. This failure placed residents at risk of acquiring potentially preventable catheter associated urinary tract complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/30/2023, documented Resident 8 was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 06/06/2023, documented Resident 8 was ordered, foley cath (catheter) care with soap and water q (every) shift, cath care wipes done on night three times a day. A physician's order, dated 07/14/2023, documented Resident 8 was ordered, foley care per protocol every 30 days, change prn [as needed] if dislodged, occluded [closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication related complications were monitored for 1 of 3 sampled residents (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse side effects from anticoagulant medication use and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility policy, Coumadin (Warfarin) and Other Anticoagulation Medication, undated, documented residents receiving any type of anticoagulation were monitored for signs and symptoms of bleeding to promote the safe and effective use of these medications. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 06/29/2023, documented Resident 5 was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 06/13/2023, documented Resident 5 was prescribed, Coumadin (an anticoagulant medication) Oral Tablet 4 MG (milligram) by mouth at bedtime for anticoagulation therapy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-09-12 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey result binder included the health recertification and complaint survey results for 2 of 3 years (2024 and 2025) reviewed for availability of survey reports. This failure prevented residents, resident representatives, family members, and visitors from exercising their right to review past survey results.Findings included . In an observation on 09/10/2025 at 10:30 AM, the facility's survey binder was observed in a wall mounted receptacle across from the nurse's station near the skilled nursing entrance of the facility. Record review of the survey binder labelled, [NAME] Care Center Survey Binder 3 most current years of survey reports. showed the binder contained a Federal Fire and Life Safety re-certification survey, dated 09/10/2024, and the re-inspection, dated 10/31/2024, as the most recent survey completed. Further review of the binder did not show health re-certification survey results for 2024 and/or health complaint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 54.0-3.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Pilot Butte Rehabilitation CenterBend, OR 1 of 5Puyallup Post AcutePuyallup, WA 2 of 5Park Rose Care CenterTacoma, WA 2 of 5Regency AlbanyAlbany, OR 2 of 5Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing CenterCoupeville, WA 3 of 5Kauai Care CenterWaimea, HI 3 of 5Laurel Hill Nursing CenterGrants Pass, OR 3 of 5Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab CenterHermiston, OR 3 of 5View Ridge Care CenterEverett, WA 4 of 5Arlington Health And RehabilitationArlington, WA 4 of 5Regency Care Center At MonroeMonroe, WA 4 of 5Regency FlorenceFlorence, OR 5 of 5Good Samaritan Health Care CtrYakima, WA 5 of 5Mt Baker Care CenterBellingham, WA 5 of 5Regency At NorthpointeSpokane, WA 5 of 5Regency At The ParkCollege Place, WA 5 of 5Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick, WA 5 of 5Regency Care Of Central OregonBend, OR 5 of 5Regency Care Of Rogue ValleyGrants Pass, OR 5 of 5Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterGresham, OR 5 of 5Regency Harmony House Rehab & NursingBrewster, WA 5 of 5Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOlympia, WA 5 of 5Regency OmakOmak, WA 5 of 5Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing CentPrineville, OR 5 of 5Regency Redmond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRedmond, OR 5 of 5Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing CenterWenatchee, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WOLKIN, PETERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 01/01/2023
NIGHTINGALE HEALTHCARE LLC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
BLOOD, JONATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/02/2024
MARTINEZ, SERGIOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2023
SEKERAMAYI, FLOYDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CLAY, JAMESIndividualGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/20/2000
PHARMACY CORPORATION OF AMERICAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
PREMERE REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$319K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 38%Medicare 45%Other / private 17%

This home reported $319K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$781per resident / day
operating cost
$23,733per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$720per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505429. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next