No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency Care Center At Monroe

1355 West Main Street, Monroe, WA 98272 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 92 certified beds · (360) 794-4011 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 794-4011 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1237 W Main St · (360) 794-1061 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
17788 147th St SE · (360) 794-4641 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
19191 N Kelsey Street · (360) 965-5081 · Call to confirm hours
Park
806 W Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1405 W Main St · (360) 805-6200

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.6%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%17.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.1%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.2%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.4%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.4%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.1%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.831.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.051.521.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.5%CMS range 56.6–71.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.6–12.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.0–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.08
RN hours/ resident / day
0.55
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.81
RN hoursweekends
31.7%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 77.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.452 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-07)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of injury and emotional distress.Findings included.Review of a facility policy, titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised date 10/2022, documented physical abuse included hitting and slapping.Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition according to the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 03/04/2026.Resident 2 had severely impaired cognition and rarely understood others according to the MDS dated [DATE].Review of a progress note, dated 05/21/2026, documented Resident 1 had been hit on the side of the head by another resident.Review of a progress note, dated 05/21/2026, documented Resident 2 had struck another resident on the head. The note documented Resident 2 was attempting to push another resident in their wheelchair. Other residents that were present told Resident 2 to stop pushing the wheelchair which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that unless the facility had a full-time Registered Dietician, that the Dietary Manager (Staff E) had completed an academic program in nutrition or dietetics accredited by an appropriate national accreditation organization. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving dietary services from staff without the required competencies and skills to carry out food and nutrition services. Findings include . In an interview on 05/02/2025 at 10:13 AM, Staff E, Dietary Manager stated that they have worked as Dietary Manager for almost a year. They were currently enrolled for the dietary manager certification and will be done in December 2025. Staff E provided a certificate that showed ServSafe Food Protection Manager Certification. Online research showed that this was not the required credential as a Dietary Manager. In an interview on 05/06/2025 at 10:10 AM, Staff D, Registered Dietitian stated that they work 32 hours a week. They work 2 days in the facility and 2 days at the other facility in Coupeville. They visit the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured grievances were addressed and resolved in response to residents' verbal conveyance of concerns for 6 of 6 resident council's (October 2024, December 2024, January 2025, March 2025 and April 2025), who verbalized complaints during Resident Council (RC) meeting and failed to follow the grievance process for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 47) who voiced grievances of missing pants. These failures led to residents repeatedly reporting the same issues without resolution and placed them at risk of feeling frustrated, unimportant, with diminished self-worth and decreased quality of life. Findings included . In a review of the facility policy titled, Grievance Procedure showed the facility would have a process in place for notification, identification, and follow up of resident/resident representative grievances in a timely manner. The facility would utilize their grievance form and ensure that all written grievances decisions included the date the grievance was received, summary of the grievance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines (IPCP) and standards of practice for 1 of 3 units (Cascade Unit) reviewed for infection control practices and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 4) observed with personal care. The facility failed to follow IPCP standards during resident care activities and when handling garbage. The facility failed to ensure that staff used Personal Protective Equipment ([PPE] - specialized clothing worn to protect from infection or illness) during personal care, high contact resident care activities and handling garbage and failed to sanitize equipment after use. These failures placed all residents and staff at an increased risk for the potential transmission of infections. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Transmission-Based Precaution, Revised date 11/2024, documented Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) are indicated for residents with chronic wounds. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <RESIDENT 273> Resident 273 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 10:25 AM, Resident 273 stated they fell the day after the admission and they hurt their hip. In an interview on 05/05/2025 at 9:27 AM, Resident 273 stated they fell three months ago. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 273 had a fall in their room on 04/25/2025 and complained increased pain in the right hip on the next day. Review of Resident 273's fall risk evaluation on admission, dated 04/24/2025 at 1:45 PM, showed Resident 273 had one to two falls in the past three months. Review of Resident 273's admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 273 did not have a fall in the last month prior to admission, in the last two to six months prior to admission, or no fall since admission. The care area assessment (CAA) related to fall was not triggered as no fall indicated in the MDS. In an interview on 05/05/2025 at 10:58 AM, Staff H stated they did not review Resident 273's EHR. Staff H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure residents' abilities in activities of daily living (ADLs) did not diminish. The facility failed to provide showers/bathing to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 63) reviewed for ADLs. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable decline, unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Resident 63 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fracture of the pelvis, chronic pain, and spinal stenosis (narrowing I the spinal canal which leads to compression on the spinal cord). In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 10:32 AM Resident 63 stated they would like more than one shower a week. Resident 63 stated they were admitted to the facility around Thanksgiving time and there was a time when they did not get a shower for almost two full weeks. Review of Resident 63's care plan dated 11/18/2024, documented that they had a deficit in performing their bathing/showering due to a recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper treatment to maintain vision for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 7) reviewed for vision. This failure placed residents at risk for decline in the ability to see and diminish quality of life. Findings include . Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses to include Cataract (clouding of the lens of the eye), Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (persistently high blood sugar levels). According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident was cognitively intact, wears glasses and had adequate vision. In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 10:45 AM, Resident 7 stated that they wanted to get their eyes checked and that they might need new glasses. They don't remember the last time they had an eye exam. In a record review on 05/05/2025, it was documented that Resident 7 received new prescription eyeglasses in September 2021. In an interview on 05/05/2025 at 2:23 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective interventions were implemented to maintain adequate nutrition for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 275) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the residents at risk for ongoing poor oral intake, weight loss, poor nutrition and potential harm. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition and Hydration Maintenance, revised date 06/2024, showed the nutrition assessment would include: - History of food and fluid intake - Refusal of meals and poor intake - Resident preferences - If a resident refuses a meal or consumes less than 50%, a meal substitute will be offered. Resident 275 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment, dated 04/28/2025, Resident 275 was cognitively intact and complained about difficulty or pain when swallowing. In an observation and interview on 05/01/2025 at 12:32 PM, observed Resident 275…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 11) reviewed for hemodialysis (medical procedure that uses a machine to filter and clean the blood when the kidneys are failing) had consistent, completed and accurate assessments on the dialysis communication form (a form containing vital information about the resident which is sent to dialysis center for coordination of care and services) and failed to have a care plan that provided an accurate description of where their access site (a location on the resident's body in which the dialysis process is done) was located. These failures placed the resident at risk for medical complications, confusion among their medical providers, and unmet care needs. Findings Included . Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease and was receiving hemodialysis. In an interview on 05/05/2025 at 11:31 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/ Resident Care Manager (RCM) stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health care and services were provided for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 63) reviewed for behavioral health services. This failure placed residents at risk for increased behaviors, not receiving necessary services to meet their mental health needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Resident 63 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (a condition that occurs during the development of the nervous system which affect attention and impulsivity) and bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by extreme shift in mood, energy and activity levels). In a review of Resident 63's monthly medication review for 02/10/2025 showed a recommendation for a psychiatric evaluation of their medications as a contributing factor to falls. The medication review was not signed by the physician or noted by any of the facility staff. In a review of Resident 63's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 54) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to evaluate the need for continued use of an antifungal medication placed residents at risk for use of unnecessary medications and/or have adverse side effects. Findings include . Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses to include chronic abdominal wall abscess. In a record review on 05/05/2025 at 8:50 AM, Resident 5's orders showed Fluconazole 200 mg tablet one time a day every Thursday for infection. The order was dated 06/27/2024. Record review of the May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that Resident 54 received a dose of Fluconazole on 05/01/2025. Record review of monthly Medication Regimen Review Reports from Pharmacy since December 2024 did not show any notes regarding Fluconazole use of Resident 54. In an interview on 05/07/2025 at 8:53 AM, Staff F,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in which residents' records were complete, accurate, and accessible, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4) reviewed for hospice (end of life) services. The facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records contained hospice provider's notes which placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and for diminished quality of life. Finding included . <RESIDENT 4> Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and enrolled in hospice services starting on 12/13/2024. Review of Resident 4's electronic health record (EHR) showed no hospice visit nurse documentation since 12/26/2024. Review of a form titled, Interdisciplinary Team of Care SNF (Skilled Nurse Facility)/ALF (Assisted Living Facility) and Hospice Plan of care dated 12/13/2024, indicated the hospice skilled nurse to visit twice a week and the home health aide to visit twice a week. In an interview on 05/05/2025 at 9:07AM, Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in 1 of 2 emergency carts (carts that contain needed medical equipment during an emergency) when an unlocked sharps container (a specialized, puncture-resistant, and leak-proof container designed for the safe disposal of sharp medical instruments, like needles, syringes, and scalpels, to prevent accidental injuries and ensure proper waste handling) was found to be soiled and contained five syringes. This failure placed residents and staff at risk for injury, potential exposure to diseases and lack of necessary medical equipment during an emergency. Findings Included . In an observation on 05/01/2025 at 8:53 AM observed an emergency cart located outside of the Cascade Residential Unit Nurses station, near the entrance of the shower room, with an unlocked sharps container on the lower shelf. In an observation of the sharp's container, the top cover to the sharp's container was soiled with unidentifiable brown matter and five syringes inside of the container. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the person designated to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (Staff P) had the proper qualifications. This failure placed all residents at risk of receiving dietary services from staff without the required competencies and skills to carry out food and nutrition services. Findings included . On 02/20/2023 at 9:16 AM, Staff P, Dietary Manager (DM), stated they were not a certified DM. Staff P stated they had only experienced survey twice and were in the process of obtaining their certification. In an interview on 02/23/2024 at 1:08 PM, Staff P stated the facility had a contracted Registered Dietician that comes to the facility weekly. On 02/20/2024 at 9:16 AM, the posted food handler cards and certificates located on a corkboard in a hallway section of the kitchen were reviewed, showed no certifications for Staff P other than their food handler's card. In a review of the staff roster, undated, showed that Staff P had been employed at the facility since 09/19/2018. Refer to WAC 388-97-1160…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (Resident 3, 6, 21, and 7) reviewed for range of motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM and/or prevent further decrease in ROM. This failure placed the residents already identified with decreased ROM risk for further decline in ROM. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Restorative Program, dated April 2018, showed, The goal of the Restorative Program was to promote and maintain the highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial functioning and thereby improve self-esteem and quality of life. The restorative program was a philosophy of care with a specific approach that was organized, planned, documented, monitored, must evaluated to improve or maintain function and/or prevent a slow decline. The restorative program much include the following: - An assessment completed by a licensed nurse, which demonstrated the need for the Restorative Program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual Nurse Aide Certified (NAC) performance reviews were completed for 3 of 5 employee (NAC's Q, R and T) files reviewed who had been employed longer than 1 year. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of these NAC's and the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, Training Requirements, revised 10/2022 showed facilities will conduct annual performance reviews to identify any areas of weakness that require further education. Staff Q, NAC, was hired on 03/09/2022. Review of Staff Q's employee file showed there was no current employee evaluation done. There was no evidence the evaluator completed this evaluation nor if it was reviewed/discussed with Staff Q. Staff R, NAC, was hired on 04/26/2022. Review of Staff R's employee file showed there was no current employee evaluation done. There was no evidence the evaluator completed this evaluation nor if it was reviewed/discussed with Staff R. Staff T, NAC, was hired on 08/30/2022.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in which resident's records were complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized for 6 of 6 residents (Residents 6, 22, 35, 17, 50, and 61) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. Failure to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurate placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and for diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 6> Review of the December 2023 documentation survey report (v2 - where the Nursing Assistant Certified documents when resident care was performed), showed no documentation of Activities of Daily Living (ADL - dressing, transfers, bed mobility, walking/locomotion, bathing personal hygiene, toileting and eating) care was provided to Resident 6 once on the day shift (12/24/2023), twice on the evening shift (12/25/2023 and 12/26/2023), and six times on the NOC (night) shift (12/01/2023, 12/08/2023, 12/16/2023, 12/21/2023, 12/26/2023, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for 3 of 6 nurses (Staff F, Staff G, and Staff H) during medication administration, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 17) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 17) during enteral (nutrition provided through tube inserted directly into the intestine) feeding administration, and for appropriate hand hygiene practices in 2 of 3 dining rooms (Cascade and Sky River). The facility failed to ensure staff were wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with recommended national standards, staff followed appropriate infection control practices during medication administration, and administration of an enteral feeding. The facility's failure to ensure the staff were compliant with appropriate hand hygiene practices while serving meals and did not touch the resident's food with their bare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an in-service training program for 4 of 5 Nursing Assistants Certified (NAC's Q, R, S and T) reviewed for the required 12 hour of nurse aide training per year. The failure to ensure NAC's received 12 hour per year in-service training placed residents at risk for potential unmet care needs. Findings included Review of the facility's policy, Training Requirements, revised 10/2022, showed facilities will maintain an annual calendar of the required education. Facilities will provide annual required training that include: - Communication. - Resident Rights. - Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. - QAPI. - Infection Control. - Compliance and Ethics. - Required ln-service Training for Nurse Aides. - Required 12 hours including Dementia and Abuse Prevention. - Training for Feeding Assistants as applicable. - Dementia/Behavioral Health. - Trauma informed care. - Emergency/Disaster/Life Safety. - Blood borne Pathogen. Review of Staff Q, R, S and T's employee file, showed each NAC did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan that addressed the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 50) reviewed for activities. These failures placed the residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their individualized needs. Findings included . Resident 50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive brain disorder which affects memory, thinking and behavior), and glaucoma (a group of eye conditions that damage the optic nerve). On 02/21/2024 at 8:55 AM, Resident 50 was observed inside of the nurse's station, seated in their wheelchair (w/c), picking at the gold flecks in the countertop of the nurse's station. In a continuous observation on 02/21/2024 starting at 9:23 AM, Resident 50 was observed inside of the nurse's station, with a binder titled The Purple Book…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (Resident 55) were provided medications within physician prescribed medication parameters. These failures placed residents at risk for complications and adverse health outcomes. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, revised date 01/01/2022, showed prior to administration of a medication the staff were to check vital signs if necessary. Resident 55 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of high Blood Pressure (BP). Review of Resident 55's current physician orders, showed an order for lisinopril (medication for BP) 10 milligram daily, hold if systolic BP (top number of BP) was less than 100, dated 12/13/2023. Review of the January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR), showed no BP documented prior to the administration of lisinopril. There was an entry for weekly BP to be checked every Monday. Review of the February MAR dated 02/01/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure proper storage of drugs and biologicals on 2 of 4 medication carts (Medication Carts Sky River and Cascade 2) and to ensure 1 of 4 medication carts (Sky River) was locked and not accessible to residents. This failure placed the residents, staff, and visitors at risk for medication related illness/injury due to unauthorized access to and use of medications. Findings included . The facility's policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 01/01/2022, showed facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended and should ensure medication carts are always locked when they are out of sight or unattended. Observation of the Sky River medication cart on 02/21/2024 at 8:47 AM, a medication box labeled Diclofenac (a mild pain reliever) 10% topical gel was on top of the medication cart to the left of room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were no staff present. At 8:50 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), returned to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the required refund for 1 of 4 sampled residents and/or their resident representative (Resident 1) within the required 30 days after the resident discharged . This failed practice placed the resident and/or resident representative at risk of financial hardship. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Refund Process, dated October 2021, showed resident refunds are issued to discharged residents who have credit balances resulting from advance payment of accommodation and ancillary charges. Refunds should be issued within 30 days of discharge. In a phone interview on 12/08/2023 at 1:10 PM, Collateral Contact 1 (CC1), Resident 1's representative, stated they had not received the resident's refund from the facility for their partial stay for the month of July 2023. CC1 stated they had spoken to the facility's Business Office Manager (BOM) twice, and each time the BOM had told them they would look into the matter and had never gotten back with them. CC 1 stated the resident had moved to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) for death in the facility. Failure to provide CPR for a resident who was found with no pulse and no respirations, and who had a written advance directive that indicated the resident wanted to receive life-sustaining care and services placed the resident at risk for lack of needed emergency medical interventions and unexpected death. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), dated 05/2019, showed the facility shall be able to and does provide emergency basic life support immediately when needed, including CPR, to a resident requiring such care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel in accordance with the related physicians' orders and the resident's advance directives. Review of Resident 1's medical record showed the resident was a full code according to their Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment in three of three hallways observed. The failure to maintain overhead light fixtures that were free of dead insects and debris placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . In observations on 09/30/2022 at 1:20 PM, overhead light fixtures were observed to be soiled with dead insects and other debris, to include overhead light fixtures: -in many overhead lights in the front hallway of the facility; -in the hallway light fixture near room [ROOM NUMBER]; -outside rooms 303, 151, 154, 158, 161, 174, 176, 184, 403, 220, 223, 402, 218, 130; -in many overhead light fixtures at the Cascade and Sky River nursing stations; and -in many overhead light fixtures in the hallway outside the kitchen. In an interview on 09/30/2022 at 1:40 PM, Staff C, Maintenance Director, stated they had not had the time to get all of the light fixtures cleaned. Reference: (WAC) 388-97-0880 (1)(2)

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess five of 16 residents (21, 36, 37, 47, and 49) whose Minimum Data Sets (MDS) Assessment was reviewed. Failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding positioning (Resident 21), oxygen use (Resident 36), pressure ulcer (injury to skin from prolonged pressure) (Resident 37), blood thinner medication use (Resident 47) and hearing (Resident 49), placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.17.1, dated October 2019, (a guide to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment). The RAI consists of three basic components: the MDS Version 3.0, the Care Area Assessment (CAA) process and the RAI Utilization Guidelines. The utilization of the three components of the RAI yields information about a resident's functional status, strengths, weaknesses, and preferences, as well as offering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for three of four halls. The facility failed to ensure oversight and management during an outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise [a general feeling of discomfort/uneasiness], headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death). The facility failed to ensure a positive staff member was not isolated from other staff, failed to ensure staff used personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with national standards, failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene practices were followed, and failed to ensure the staff cleaned and disinfected eye protection according to national standards. These failures placed all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection prevention and control Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP, a system-wide implementation of measures for monitoring/tracking of antibiotics along with reducing the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use) was implemented for four of four residents (14, 17, 32, and 57). This failure increased the resident's risk for development of multidrug-resistant organisms (a bacteria that are resistant to many antibiotics) along with potential for unidentified nursing care trends that identify risk related to infection prevention. This failure had the potential for adverse outcomes associated with unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use and a decrease in quality of life for all facility residents. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revised 10/2017, stated Regency Pacific affiliated skilled nursing facilities will monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics of the residents, reduce the threat of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights to make choices for frequency of bathing for two of two residents (35 and 36) reviewed for choices. The failure to assess and honor resident choices placed residents at risk for impaired hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 11/2016, showed that the facility will honor resident rights as listed below: Resident has the right to reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences. RESIDENT 35 Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a degenerative disease of the nervous system. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a resident assessment tool, dated 08/04/2022, showed the resident was cognitively intact and that it was very important to the resident to make choices about showers. There were no preferences listed for the resident related to shower/bathing preferences of days, times of day or how many per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for one of three residents (#32) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure safety interventions were implemented for a resident at risk for falls. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings Included . Resident 32 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included delusions, hallucinations, muscle weakness, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of current physician orders on 10/03/2022, showed order for Right bedside floor mat, ordered on 09/10/2022. Review of current comprehensive care plan showed Resident 32 was at risk for falls related to weakness, confusion, hallucinations, and delusions. Interventions included use of right bedside fall mat; ensure device is in place and in good repair, initiated on 09/15/2022. Multiple observations on 09/28/2022, 09/30/2022 and 10/03/2022 showed that the fall mat for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (26), reviewed for edema received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's person-centered care plan. This failure placed the resident at a risk for pain, discomfort, and unidentified decline. Findings included . Resident 26 admitted to the facility 07/22/2021 with diagnosis to include a history of a heart attack, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and high blood pressure. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the Discharge summary dated [DATE] showed the resident had a recommendation for a referral to cardiology (Heart specialist) related to their heart attack, and elevated blood pressure. The summary stated the resident had a medical history of heart failure. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four residents (49 and 36) reviewed for respiratory care received appropriate oxygen (O2) services. Failure of the facility to ensure O2 delivery was provided according to physician ordered flow rates, monitor respiratory status, and maintain O2 equipment, placed residents at risk of discomfort and a potential negative outcome. Findings included . RESIDENT 49 Resident 49 most recently admitted on [DATE]. On 09/28/2022 at 11:39 AM, Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN), stated that Resident 49 was not on O2 all the time. Review of the physician orders on 09/29/2022, showed Resident 49 had a physician order dated 08/19/2019 that read, Oxygen 2L (liter). Increase as per resident needs and comfort. Every shift for Shortness of breath/comfort, decreased O2 sat (saturation) Review of nursing progress notes showed: - On 09/27/2022 at 1:12 AM resident was on 1.5 L of O2; - On 09/27/2022 at 9:42 PM resident was on 1.5 L of O2; - On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assure food was consumed or discarded within safe time limits for one of one residents (41) reviewed for in-room food service. Allowing residents to eat foods that had sat at room temperature for extended periods of time placed resident(s) at risk for food borne illness. Findings included . RESIDENT 41 On 09/28/2022 at 12:27 PM, the meal cart for the Reflections unit arrived from the Kitchen. At 3:25 PM, Resident 41 was noted to take two bites of ham from their meal tray that was still in front of them, almost three hours after it arrived on the unit. On 09/28/2022 at 3:59 PM, Staff A, Registered Nurse/Patient Care Coordinator, stated that the facility did not have a policy on how long food could remain at the bedside before it should be removed. On 09/29/2022 at 12:24 PM, the meal cart for the Reflections unit arrived from the Kitchen. At 3:02 PM, Resident 41 still had their meal tray in front of them and was picking at their food. 09/30/2022 at 3:02 PM, Staff F, Dietary Manager, stated that food should not sit out for more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Pilot Butte Rehabilitation CenterBend, OR 1 of 5Puyallup Post AcutePuyallup, WA 2 of 5Park Rose Care CenterTacoma, WA 2 of 5Regency AlbanyAlbany, OR 2 of 5Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing CenterCoupeville, WA 3 of 5Kauai Care CenterWaimea, HI 3 of 5Laurel Hill Nursing CenterGrants Pass, OR 3 of 5Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab CenterHermiston, OR 3 of 5Sharon Care CenterCentralia, WA 3 of 5View Ridge Care CenterEverett, WA 4 of 5Arlington Health And RehabilitationArlington, WA 4 of 5Regency FlorenceFlorence, OR 5 of 5Good Samaritan Health Care CtrYakima, WA 5 of 5Mt Baker Care CenterBellingham, WA 5 of 5Regency At NorthpointeSpokane, WA 5 of 5Regency At The ParkCollege Place, WA 5 of 5Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick, WA 5 of 5Regency Care Of Central OregonBend, OR 5 of 5Regency Care Of Rogue ValleyGrants Pass, OR 5 of 5Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterGresham, OR 5 of 5Regency Harmony House Rehab & NursingBrewster, WA 5 of 5Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOlympia, WA 5 of 5Regency OmakOmak, WA 5 of 5Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing CentPrineville, OR 5 of 5Regency Redmond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRedmond, OR 5 of 5Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing CenterWenatchee, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BEDDOE, MARVINIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2010
BEDDOE, SANDRAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2017
REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2010
NORDSTROM, JODIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/1996
RAPP, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2016
RASKIND, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
BD MONROE PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2020
OMNICARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 14%Other / private 34%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$467per resident / day
operating cost
$14,201per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$406per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505350. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next