No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Good Samaritan Health Care Ctr

702 North 16th Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902 · For profit - Individual · 105 certified beds · (509) 248-5320 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (509) 248-5320 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 2024Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1806 W Lincoln Ave · (509) 452-4520 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2001 W Lincoln Ave · (509) 452-6541 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1409 Fruitvale Blvd · (509) 453-0207 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1520 W Lincoln Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1801 Jerome Ave · (509) 654-5964

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.6%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.6%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.8%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.5%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.1%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.9%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.3%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.6%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.8%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.9%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.261.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.591.521.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 376 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 199 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.6%CMS range 51.0–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.1–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge74.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 4.1–8.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
22.8%
Total nursing turnover
18.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 87.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.46 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.66 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-18)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control interventions intended to mitigate the risk for transmission of COVID-19 were consistently implemented in the areas of proper donning (putting on), use of, and doffing (taking off) personal protective equipment [(PPE) equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that can cause injuries], providing readily available PPE for 3 of 5 teams (Team 4, Team 2, and Team 1), and cross contamination during catheter care for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident 71) reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents at risk for transmission of communicable diseases, illness, and death. Findings included. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled, Use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) When Caring for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19, dated 06/03/2020, showed PPE must be donned correctly before entering the patient area and must remain in place and worn correctly for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice [(ABN) a notification that provides an estimated cost of continued services which may no longer be covered by Medicare; beneficiaries may choose to continue services but may be financially liable] as required for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 32) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This failure placed the resident at risk for their inability to make informed financial and care decisions related to their continued stay.Findings included . Resident 32 Review of the medical record showed Resident 32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including anxiety disorders, arthritis, and heart failure. The 09/10/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 32 required supervision/moderate assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living. The assessment also showed Resident 32 had a moderately impaired cognition. Review of the medical record showed Resident 32 was covered by Medicare Part A (insurance that covers skilled nursing care after a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or related conditions] Level II assessment [a more in-depth screening, to identify whether nursing home services were needed and if specialized mental health services were required] was completed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 58), reviewed for PASARR services. This failure placed the resident at risk for inappropriate placement, and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet mental health care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review WA (PASARR), revised 06/2024, showed individuals identified with a positive screen, require a PASARR Level II referral for evaluation and determination prior to admission to the facility. Resident 58 Review of the medical record showed Resident 58 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications and vaccines were properly stored for 1 of 3 medication rooms (Team 4 medication room) and medications were properly labeled for 2 of 5 medication carts (Team 1 and Team 4 medication carts) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk of receiving expired medications, experiencing compromised or ineffective medications and vaccines and negative health outcomes. Review of the policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 01/01/2020, showed medications and biologicals were stored safely and properly, and expired medications were removed from supply and destroyed by the facility. The facility should maintain and monitor the refrigerator that stores vaccines at least twice daily per Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Additionally, when a medication vial was initially opened, the nurse would place a sticker on the medication and enter the open date and the new date of expiration per the manufacturer's guidance. Review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (USFDA) Information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess and manage the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF, a weakened heart condition, in which the heart doesn't pump blood as effectively as it should, and causes fluid build-up in the feet, arms, lungs and other organs) according to physician orders for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for the management of CHF. This failure placed the resident at risk for fluid overload, respiratory complications, and exacerbation of (worsening of) heart failure. Findings included.Resident 1Resident record review showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including CHF, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, is a lung condition caused by damage to the airways that limit airflow), and atrial fibrillation (A-fib, an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart.) Review of the 10/30/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set [(MDS) assement tool] accurately reflected the status for 6 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 32, 84, 79, 3, 29 and 96) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 32> Review of Resident 32's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left hip fracture and heart failure. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 32 required moderate assistance with their transfers and activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the 5-day MDS assessment, dated 07/03/2024, showed section N, Medications, indicated Resident 32 was taking an anticoagulant (medication used to prevent and treat blood clots by interfering with the bloods ability to form clots). Review of Resident 32's physician orders showed the resident was prescribed clopidogrel bisulfate [an antiplatelet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure implementation of their abuse prohibition policy/procedures components of resident protection, identification, reporting and investigating for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 47) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the resident at an increased risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, retaliation from the alleged perpetrator and the potential for continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, dated 08/08/2024, the Code of Federal Regulations 483.12 (b)(1), F607, The Facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of residents property, showed that in order to .provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident residing in the facility . the facility must develop and implement components of screening, training, prevention, identification,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of potential abuse and/or neglect to the State Agency, for 1 of 3 residents (Residents 47), reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, and the potential continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised October 2022, showed The purpose of the policy was to prevent, identify, report and investigate abuse, neglect and exploitation. The policy showed that to protect resident and keep them safe the alleged perpetrator would be immediately suspended, and a trusted person would stay with the resident in an area where they felt safe. Additionally, to identify abuse, facility staff were to monitor suspicious occurrences, patterns or trends that may constitute abuse <Resident 47> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 47), reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse, unmet care needs, and the potential for continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised October 2022, showed The purpose of the policy was to prevent, identify, report and investigate abuse, neglect and exploitation. The policy showed that all alleged incidents of abuse were to be thoroughly investigated in order to determine what occurred and would begin as soon as the incident was identified and the alleged victim protected. <Resident 47> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice regarding monitoring of their cardiac status (issues related to the functioning of the heart). This included daily weights and physician notification of weight changes greater than three or more pounds (ibis, a unit of measure) in a 24-hour period for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for unidentified complications and a deterioration in their health status. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), diabetes (a condition that causes elevated blood glucose) and history of a cerebral vascular accident (lack of blood supply to an area in the brain which results in brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma informed care complete with identified experiences and preferences regarding potential triggers (a stimulus that could prompt a recall of a previous traumatic event even if the stimulus itself is not traumatic or frightening) that may cause re-traumatization (a reliving of the traumatic experience) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 47) reviewed for trauma informed care. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers and re-traumatization. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, revised October 2022, showed the purpose was to .ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care .in order to eliminate or mitigate (to make less severe or painful) triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. The policy showed the facility promoted an environment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for unnecessary medications, had an acceptable indication for use for a psychoactive medication (a class of medication that affects brain activity of mental functioning and behavior). Resident 1 was prescribed an antipsychotic medication (a psychoactive medication primarily used to treat psychosis with a high risk for adverse side effects [ASE's]) with no acceptable mental health diagnosis or identified individualized target behaviors to justify the use of an antipsychotic. This failure placed Resident 1 at increased risk for deterioration in their mental and physical health status. Findings included . Record review of a facility policy titled, Behavior Management/Psychotropic Medication Overview, dated 10/2022 showed, .When psychotropic medications are ordered, an appropriate diagnosis must have been obtained .Behavior monitoring will be documented when an antipsychotic medication is ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide copies of personal and medical records, as required, to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of not having access to their complete medical history, potentially affecting their ability to make informed decisions, and violated their resident rights. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle wasting, contusion (bruise) of the scalp, and repeated falls. Review of the comprehensive assessment completed on day of discharge, dated 12/04/2023, showed Resident 1 had intact cognition and required set up and supervision assistance with personal cares. Review of record requests received by the facility showed a written request, dated 07/29/2024, was submitted to the facility on behalf of Resident 1 by a local attorney's office. The records request included a Consent for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain their Respiratory Protection Program (RPP) for N95 respirator masks (a respiratory protective device designed to filtrate airborne particles by achieving a very close facial fit) initial and annual fit testing for 4 of 5 staff (Staff D, E, F, and G) reviewed for infection control practices during a COVID-19 (an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing, that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak. This deficient practice placed residents and staff at continued risk of exposure and spread of COVID-19 during an active outbreak. Findings included . Review of guidance from the Washington State Department of Health titled Respiratory Protection Program for Long-term Care Facilities, showed the N95 respirator protected the user when the seal around the person's nose and mouth was tight enough to prevent the respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable accident when COVID 19 reagent solution (a chemical used in a test to determine if a person has COVID 19 [infectious disease by a virus causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, or new dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death]) was used as an eye drop for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for accidents and hazards. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unnecessary exposure to chemicals and potentially harmful outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of the medical record showed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pelvic fracture, head contusion (a deep bruise caused by a direct blow to the body), and bladder infection. Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 03/24/2024, showed Resident 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when physician's orders were not implemented timely for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and an overall decline in medical condition. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) to the left foot, diabetes mellitus (a disease that a disease that impairs the body's ability to process sugar in the blood), and peripheral vascular disease ([PVD] circulation disorder caused by narrowing, blockage or spasms in the blood vessels of the legs and feet). Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition, required the assistance of one person for personal cares, hygiene, dressing, and the assistance of two people…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had personal fund accounts established, received accrued interest on those accounts or accurate statements for 11 of 18 residents (Residents 1, 4, 5, 12, 21, 29, 32, 33, 50, 51, and 183) reviewed for personal funds. This failed practice caused residents not to receive or have access to monies owed to them. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy Resident Trust Account, dated 01/2023, showed the facility would provide a secure bank account that earns interest for residents. The policy further showed the trust accounts would be reconciled within two days of receiving the monthly bank statement and at that time interest would be posted to the resident's accounts. Review of the resident's printed statements and lists of trust accounts, provided by Staff D, Business Office Manager, who had personal funds accounts established, showed 11 current residents and one discharged resident with balances greater than $50.00 and no interest income had been earned or applied to the accounts. Review of a the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Four medication errors were identified for 3 of 14 residents (Residents 6, 27 and 52) observed during 25 medication administration opportunities that resulted in an error rate of 16%. Errors in medication administration had the potential to place residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication and possible adverse side effects. Findings included . <Resident 6> Review of the medical record showed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lung disease and muscle weakness. The 07/14/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required limited assistance of one staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The assessment also showed the resident had an intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders, dated 12/08/2021, showed that the resident's Methadone (a [narcotic-a medication that has a numbing, calming…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's personal refrigerators; 1. were free of expired foods, 2. temperatures were being monitored and maintained within acceptable standards of practice, and 3. cleaning schedules were followed for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 4, 5, 51, and 31) reviewed for safe food handling practices. This failed practice put residents at risk for being exposed to a food-borne illness (Illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, titled Resident Room Refrigerators/Resident Food, dated November 2019, showed temperatures of the refrigerators were to be checked and documented on the temperature log twice weekly by the housekeeping staff. The housekeeping staff were also responsible for the disposing of expired food. The policy further showed, food items that required refrigeration should have been kept in air-sealed tight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement effective infection control practices for 2 of 4 dining rooms (West and Rehab Dining Rooms), reviewed for appropriate infection control practices during meal serve out. This failure placed residents at risk for infectious diseases and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <West Dining Room> During an observation on 08/07/2023 at 11:50 AM , Staff W, Nursing Assistant, (NA), entered the [NAME] dining room and poured beverages for residents. Staff W did not wash their hands prior to serving beverages. Staff W also cleaned up a coffee spill and without performing hand hygiene continued to make drinks and serve them to the residents (Residents 9, 28, 36 and 78). Staff W assisted residents entering the dining room to their places at the tables. Staff W helped the residents with their clothing protectors and adjusted residents sitting in their wheelchairs for more upright positioning. Staff W did not perform hand hygiene after touching the residents and their equipment. Observation on 08/07/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for unlocked and opened doors to soiled utility rooms and storage rooms that contained an electrical power source, cable hookups, exposed electrical wires, metal bars, shelves with loose miscellaneous metal parts and a basket of metal oxygen connectors on 4 of 6 hallways (Hallways main, 2, 4, and 5), reviewed for safe and sanitary environment. This failure placed residents at risk of injury, potential illness related to unclean conditions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation on 08/11/2023 from 10:40 AM through 11:02 AM showed the storage room's door in the 500 hall near the nurse's station was partially open. This room had three round utility bins that contained soiled briefs and linens. Observation on 08/11/2023 from 11:04 AM to 11:12 AM showed the storage room's door in the 500 hall near the nurse's station was partially open. Observation on 08/14/2023 from 9:29 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a dignified manner when 1) tally marks (a form of numeral used for counting ongoing results) were placed on a whiteboard every time the call light button was turned on, and 2) the resident did not receive assistance with their care needs while out of the facility at an appointment (appt) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 71) reviewed for dignity. This failure resulted in Resident 71 feeling like they were part of undignifed interactions with the facility staff, they could not ask for help when they needed it, and embarrassed. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy Resident Rights, dated as revised 11/2016, showed residents had the right to .a dignified existence .inside and outside the facility . and dignity and respect when they received care and treatment. <Resident 71> Review of the resident's electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain private medical information in a manner that ensured privacy, securtiy, and confidentiality for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 39 and 53) reviewed for confidentiality of medical records during medication pass.This failure placed residents at risk for loss of personal privacy and confidentiality of medical information. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 11/2016, showed the facility will honor the resident's rights to include their right to privacy and confidentiality. The policy also showed the facility must give the resident a list of their rights which included each resident having the right to confidential treatment of their personal and medical records. These records may not be shown to any other person without permission from the resident, unless required by law for care. <Resident 39> Review of the medical record showed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 55 and 23), reviewed for comfortable room temperatures. This failure placed the resident in an uncomfortable room environment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's 11/2016 policy titled, Resident Rights, showed that the facility would honor resident rights including the right to receive treatment and care in a safe, clean and homelike environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life and individuality. <Resident 55> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness, depression, and aphasia ( a brain disorder that causes trouble speaking). The 06/23/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs). The assessment also showed the resident has a severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize a resident's grievance as an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 58), reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in Resident 58 feeling bad and placed them at risk for unidentified abuse and psychosocial harm due to unrecognized allegations of abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, dated as revised 10/2022, showed the facility was to implement procedures designed to identify potential instances of abuse. During an interview on 08/07/2023 at 3:48 PM, Resident 58 said the other day a nurse came into their room while the Nursing Assistants (NAs) were using a mechanical lift (a type of equipment used to assist a person to be lifted and transferred) to help them get out of bed. Resident 58 said the nurse seemed pushy and asked the NAs why they were using the mechanical lift, stating Resident 58 needed to try, and if they did not get up they were going to be bedridden. Resident 58 stated that during a prior conversation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 58 and 71) reviewed for allegations of abuse. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and decreased quality of life related to unrecognized abuse/neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, titled, Incident Documentation and Investigation,, dated October 2022, showed the facility would complete an incident investigation as soon as an .allegation of abuse, neglect . was identified. The policy further showed the incident should include .protect the resident; a description of the incident, including resident description and the immediate action that was taken; physician and family notification was documented; the licensed nurse (LN) obtains witness statements from the assigned nursing assistant, nursing assistants in the immediate area, nursing assistants from the shift prior, roommates, and the alleged perpetrator; the resident is placed on alert charting to monitor for adverse effects to the incident;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently follow feeding guidelines for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 78 and 28), reviewed for safe swallowing guidelines. This failure placed the residents at risk for choking, aspiration (a condition where food or liquids are breathed into the lungs), and an overall decline in their health status. Findings included . <Resident 78> Review of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing foods or liquids) and dementia. Review of the resident's most recent comprehensive assessment, dated 06/27/2023, showed the resident had impaired cognition and required an extensive assist of one for eating. Further record review showed the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] related to shortness of breath and possible aspiration pneumonia (an infection that affects one or both lungs). Review of a hospital speech therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis (a process that uses a machine to filter waste and fluids from the blood when the kidneys no longer function) received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 333 and 26), reviewed for dialysis services. The facility did not ensure that communication forms were completed, and pre/post dialysis treatment weights were consistently available for facility staff to monitor for changes in the resident's condition. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified complications. Findings included . The facility policy titled Dialysis, revised 11/2015, showed . Send the Dialysis Communication Form to the dialysis center The dialysis center documents weights for pre and post dialysis treatment. The licensed nurse on duty when the resident returns from dialysis will ensure the Dialysis Communication Form was completed . Completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure culturally competent, trauma-informed care related to assessing for trauma, and identifying triggers for residents with a history of sexual assault for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 4 and 57), reviewed for mood and behavior. This failed practice put residents at risk for re-traumatization, unidentified triggers, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, titled Trauma Informed Care, dated 10/2022, showed the facility would .identify triggers; utilization of family/friends, responsible parties for history, triggers and interventions; will offer/provide community resources including mental health services; the plan of care will be reviewed routinely . <Resident 4> Review of the resident's electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) were limited to 14 days without providing a physician-documented rationale or duration for 1of 5 residents (Resident 51) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. This failure placed the resident at risk of being over medicated, medical complications related to the side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy's, titled Behavior Monitoring/Psychotropic Medication Policy, dated October 2022, and Behavior Management/Psychotropic Medication Overview, dated October 2023, showed no process for the use of PRN psychotropic medication use. <Resident 51> Review of Resident 51's electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a lung disease and anxiety (Intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Pilot Butte Rehabilitation CenterBend, OR 1 of 5Puyallup Post AcutePuyallup, WA 2 of 5Park Rose Care CenterTacoma, WA 2 of 5Regency AlbanyAlbany, OR 2 of 5Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing CenterCoupeville, WA 3 of 5Kauai Care CenterWaimea, HI 3 of 5Laurel Hill Nursing CenterGrants Pass, OR 3 of 5Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab CenterHermiston, OR 3 of 5Sharon Care CenterCentralia, WA 3 of 5View Ridge Care CenterEverett, WA 4 of 5Arlington Health And RehabilitationArlington, WA 4 of 5Regency Care Center At MonroeMonroe, WA 4 of 5Regency FlorenceFlorence, OR 5 of 5Mt Baker Care CenterBellingham, WA 5 of 5Regency At NorthpointeSpokane, WA 5 of 5Regency At The ParkCollege Place, WA 5 of 5Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick, WA 5 of 5Regency Care Of Central OregonBend, OR 5 of 5Regency Care Of Rogue ValleyGrants Pass, OR 5 of 5Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterGresham, OR 5 of 5Regency Harmony House Rehab & NursingBrewster, WA 5 of 5Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOlympia, WA 5 of 5Regency OmakOmak, WA 5 of 5Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing CentPrineville, OR 5 of 5Regency Redmond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRedmond, OR 5 of 5Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing CenterWenatchee, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BD FACILITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 05/01/2017
BEDDOE, MARVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2017
HALL, TAYLORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/11/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$727K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 23%Other / private 24%

This home reported $727K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$427per resident / day
operating cost
$12,979per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$415per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505348. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next