Laurel Hill Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 30.1 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, follow care plans, complete thorough investigations and timely assess smoking for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6,15, 23, and 134) reviewed for accidents. Resident 15 and Resident 134 experienced falls resulting in fractures. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and stroke. A 7/13/22 admission MDS and CAAs indicated Resident 15 was impaired on both sides, at risk for falls due to weakness, required increased ADL support and her/his care plan was to include interventions to reduce the risk of falls. a. A 3/10/23 revised care plan indicated Resident 15's bed would be in a low position for safety. A 3/20/23 Fall Investigation indicated Resident 15 fell out of her/his bed around 12:15 AM, her/his bed was not in the lowest position at the time of the fall. No staff interviews were completed as part of the investigation.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a surgical wound was monitored and assessed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#177) reviewed for non-pressure skin. This resulted in Resident 177's surgical wound becoming infected, and the resident being hospitalized . Findings include: The facility's 4/2018 Skin at Risk Program Overview indicated: 16. Skin conditions other than pressure ulcers, etc. will be documented on the resident's treatment record. Other skin conditions (rashes, skin tears, excoriations, abrasions, bruises or surgical wounds) would be addressed with appropriate treatment orders. 17. The Non-Ulcer Skin Condition Evaluation would be completed weekly for wounds likely to result in complications including delayed wound healing or infections (examples: poorly approximated surgical wound or large skin tear, etc.). Resident 177 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a right below the knee amputation, diabetes, and a left fifth toe amputation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for wound care interventions for 1 of 3 sampled resident's (# 101) reviewed for coordination of wound care. This placed residents at risk for unmet wound care needs. Findings include:Resident 101 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (most severe form of pressure injury characterized by full-thickness tissue loss with exposed fascia, muscle, tendon or bone) to the sacrum (triangular bone at the base of the spine connecting the spine to the pelvis), and stroke. On 5/7/25 a BIMS evaluation indicated Resident 101 had a BIMS score of 14 and was cognitively intact. A 5/28/25 Wound Ostomy Clinic Progress Note indicated Resident 101's wound healing had stalled, and an order was faxed to the facility for the resident to get a wheelchair seat mapping completed. The order also included the facility should schedule Resident 101's seat mapping appointment. A 5/28/25 Progress Note revealed the resident returned from wound care with a new order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly follow dish sanitation practices for 1 of 1 kitchen. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: Instructions for the facility dish machine revealed the dish machine required 50 parts per million of chlorine rinse to santize. On 3/27/25 at 12:40 PM Staff 26 was observed to use the dish machine to wash dishes. Staff 26 stated she started the dish machine in the mornings when she worked and ensured chemicals were visually flowing into the dish machine to verify the chemical concentration was adequate in the dish machine. Staff 26 stated she did not know how to test for the chemcial levels of the dishwasher. The 3/2025 Sanitizing Strips and Dish Machine log indicated Staff 26 (Cook) verified the concentration of the chemical sanitation for the dishwasher was at 50 for multiple shifts on the following days she worked: 3/1/25 through 3/3/25, 3/8/25 through 3/20/25, and 3/18/25 through 3/22/25. On 3/27/25 at 1:24 PM Staff 26 stated she completed the Dish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of abuse for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 12 and 19) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for reoccurring abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with a diagnosis of dementia. The 6/2/23 care plan revealed Resident 7 had impaired cognitive function related to dementia. Staff were to ask yes/no questions to determine her/his needs. The facility's investigation revealed on 11/24/24 Staff 32 (Former CNA) reported to Staff 34 (Former LPN) Resident 7 had inappropriately touched another resident. The 1/26/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 7 had mild cognitive impairment. On 3/25/25 multiple attempts were made to contact Staff 32 and Staff 18 (Former DNS) but no response was received. On 3/27/25 at 9:21 PM Staff 34 confirmed Staff 32 told her that she witnessed Resident 7 touch another resident inappropriately. Staff 34 further stated she did not report the allegation to the State Survey Agency. On 12/9/24 a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's 10/2022 revised Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation policy was to implement procedures designed to prevent, identify, report, and investigate potential instances of abuse and mistreatment. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. The 3/9/25 admission MDS and Cognition CAA indicated Resident 12's cognition was moderately impaired, the resident had short and long term memory loss, and she/he was at risk for depression, anxiety, diminished psychosocial well-being, and non-participation in activities. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including delusional (beliefs that were contrary to reality) disorders and mild cognitive impairment. The 1/22/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 20 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and injuries of unknown origin for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 4, 7 and 19) reviewed for abuse and skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including dementia. The 2/25/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 4 had severe cognitive impairment and was never/rarely able to make decisions. The 2/25/25 Fall Risk Evaluation revealed Resident 4 had no falls within the past three months. The 2/26/25 Initial Skin Evaluation revealed no bruising. On 3/24/25 at 1:12 PM Resident 4 was observed to have a dark bruise/mark under her/his left eye that was approximately 1-inch by 1-inch. The resident was unable to be interviewed due to her/his impaired cognition. On 3/25/25 at 1:29 PM Staff 25 (LPN) stated approximately a week ago Staff 5 (CNA) reported Resident 4's black eye during the morning shift. Staff 25 confirmed sometimes it took 2 to 3 aides to help with the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and provide medications to treat a chronic condition for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6, 19, 25, and 84) reviewed for constipation, hospice, abuse, and choices. This placed residents at risk for bowel obstruction and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 12/2017 with diagnoses including stroke. The 1/7/25 physician's order indicated Resident 6's bowel care protocol for constipation included: -Senna (laxative medication) tablets or Miralax powder (laxative medication) may be used as needed if there was no bowel movement (BM) within 24 hours after two consecutive days without a BM. -Take one bisacodyl (laxative medication) tablet orally every 24 hours if there was no BM in three days. -Administer one bisacodyl suppository rectally every 24 hours if no BM in four days. If this occurs, notify provider. -A fleet enema (laxative medication) should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a pressure ulcer at the time it was identified for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#83) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and pain. Findings include: An Incident Documentation and Investigation policy revised on 10/2022 revealed an incident report was to be completed when new pressure ulcers, Stage II (partial thickness skin loss or may present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) or greater were identified. When the incident occurred, the resident was to be examined by the nurse and care provided. Once immediate care was provided, the nurse was to initiate an investigation. Resident 83 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with a diagnosis of a respiratory illness. Resident 83's 3/13/25 admission Profile form revealed, upon admission to the facility in 3/2025, she/he did not have a pressure ulcer. Resident 83's 3/2025 Documentation Survey Report (CNA documentation of care provided) revealed on 3/18/25, during the evening shift, a CNA identified a new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate dosing of medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for complications related to medications. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm) and high blood pressure. The 3/9/25 revised care plan indicated Resident 12 received medication for her/his atrial fibrillation and medications were to be provided according to physician orders. The 3/2025 MAR indicated to administer hydralazine (blood pressure medication) three times daily and hold for a systolic (upper number) blood pressure less than 120. Resident 12 was administered hydralazine as follows: -3/13/25 at 8:00 AM with a systolic blood pressure of 119. -3/13/25 at 12:00 PM with a systolic blood pressure of 119. -3/13/25 at 4:00 PM with a systolic blood pressure of 104. -3/18/25 at 4:00 PM with a systolic blood pressure of 108. -3/19/25 at 12:00 PM with a systolic blood pressure of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided dental services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with a diagnosis of a stroke. Resident 26's 1/4/25 admission MDS revealed Resident 26 was alert, unable to communicate, had likely cavities, and broken molars. Resident 26's 1/13/25 Care Conference did not address if Resident 26 or her/his representative wanted Resident 26 to be assessed by a dentist for her/his identified dental issues. On 3/25/25 at 11:53 AM Resident 26 was observed to eat and did not show signs of pain while eating. On 3/26/25 at 11:07 AM Staff 17 (Social Services) stated if a resident was assessed to have dental issues on the MDS, staff were to offer dental services. Staff 17 stated she did not reach out to Resident 26's representative to offer dental services. On 3/26/25 at 11:12 AM and on 3/27/25 at 12:15 PM Staff 15 (LPN Resident Care Manager)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure clean items were not stored in contaminated areas for 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: On 3/26/25 at 12:16 PM observations of the dirty side of the laundry room revealed the following: -approximately 15 pillows -four uncovered styrofoam cushions -and a triangular wedge were present on the shelf. On 3/26/25 at 12:02 PM Staff 35 (Laundry/housekeeping) stated the pillows, styrofoam cushions and a triangular wedge had been stored on the dirty laundry side for approximately one month. She reported her concerns to the maintenance director but the items were not removed. On 3/26/25 at 12:17 PM Staff 36 (Assistant Maintenance Director) confirmed he placed the pillows, styrofoam cushions, and a triangular wedge in the laundry room on the soiled linen side some time ago. He stated he did not know this was an infection control issue. On 3/28/25 at 9:20 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) were informed of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,465 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $23,465 — penalty dated 2023-12-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $328K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR