No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency Care Of Rogue Valley

1710 NE Fairview Avenue, Grants Pass, OR 97526 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (541) 479-2606 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (541) 479-2606 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 12 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
414 NE E St · (541) 479-2251 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
162 NE Beacon Dr Ste 109 · (541) 474-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1101 Grants Pass Pkwy · (541) 474-7200 · Call to confirm hours
Park
White Horse Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
229 NE Beacon Dr · (541) 479-2639

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.1%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.2%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.7%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.2%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%5.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.0%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.6%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%81.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.2%21.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%16.1%12.0%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 183 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.1%CMS range 63.1–74.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.4%CMS range 6.2–11.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.3–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
23.0%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 44.6 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.41 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-27)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide required communication and documentation for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 49 and 51) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. This placed residents at risk for unsafe discharge. Findings include: The 8/2024 Facilities Bed Hold Policy and Agreement Form indicated a resident who was temporarily absent from the facility because of a Break in Services (defined under Oregon law as a hospitalization or leave of absence) may apply for a bed hold to ensure her/his bed was preserved for her/his anticipated return. The policy indicated at the time of discharge to the hospital; the discharging nurse would give the residents and representatives a copy of the Bed Hold Policy and Agreement.1.Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and stroke.On 1/18/26, Resident 51 left for a physician appointment. After the appointment, Resident 51 went home with Witness 1 (Family Member). On 1/18/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain water temperatures for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 27 and 88) reviewed for environment and accidents. This placed residents at risk for burns. Findings include: 1. Resident 27 admitted to the facility 10/2024 with a diagnosis of a wedge compression fracture. An 10/2024 admission MDS revealed Resident 27 was cognitively intact. Resident 27 resided in Birch Hall. On 11/19/24 at 10:54 AM Resident 27 stated on one occassion she/he used the sink to wet her/his hair. On 11/19/24 at 10:56 AM Staff 6 (Maintenance Director) used a digital thermometer to test the hot water temperature at the tap of the sink in Resident 27's room. The thermometer indicated the hot water temperature was 125 degrees F. Staff 6 acknowledged the temperature of the hot water in Resident 27's room needed to be dialed down. 2. Resident 88 admitted to the facility 11/2024 with a diagnosis of hip surgery. A 11/14/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 88 was cognitively intact. Resident 88 resided in Cedar Hall. On 11/18/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure concerns regarding proper food temperatures were addressed for Resident Council and 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 9 and 25) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for food that was not palatable. Findings include: A 9/9/24 computer dashboard communication revealed CNAs were provided a reminder to not reheat anything for a resident in a microwave oven because resident safety and staff licenses were at risk. Staff were given the following direction: Coffee-offer to get them a new cup. Food-ask the kitchen to reheat the food. 1. On 11/20/24 at 11:00 AM nine residents attended a Resident Council meeting. A majority of the residents in attendance agreed staff were not allowed to warm or address cold food concerns when a resident stated she/he was concerned about cold food. On 11/20/24 at 8:04 AM Staff 11 (Dietary Manager) stated the kitchen had one additional meal available if a resident requested warmer food during a meal service. Staff 11 stated food handled by a resident could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident prior to change of administration of medication for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#139) reviewed for informed consent. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent. Findings include: Resident 139 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including depression. A 3/26/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 139 was cognitively intact. admission orders signed 3/28/24 revealed Citalopram (an anti-depressant) 60mg at bedtime and Imipramine (an anti-depressant) 50mg at bedtime for depression. An 4/9/24 provider order specified Citalopram 20mg at bedtime and Imipramine 25mg at bedtime for depression. An 4/18/24 provider note indicated the provider spoke with Resident 139 and she/he had no unaddressed concerns. A review of Resident 139's chart revealed no documentation to indicate Resident 139 was notified of the changes to her/his medications. On 11/18/24 at 2:49 PM Resident 139 stated she/he was taking Citalopram 60mg and Imipramine 50mg at bedtime as a successful depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a meaningful activity program for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of social engagement. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with a diagnosis of paralysis. A 7/23/24 annual MDS revealed Resident 3 was cognitively impaired, preferred to stay in bed, and required assistance with ADLs. When interviewed, Resident 3 indicated choosing activities was very important. Activities important to Resident 3 included interaction with pets and reading. A care plan initiated on 8/23/23 and revised on 10/7/24 indicated Resident 3 was at risk for little activity involvement related to physical mobility, decreased ROM, impaired motor skills, and deficits in judgement. Activities to offer included to invite Resident 3 to group activities, provide 1:1 visits, and to provide reading material. An 10/23/24 Activities Quarterly Participation Review form indicated Resident 3 preferred to self-direct her/his own activities,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly assess a pressure ulcer and revise treatments for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 3/2017 with diagnoses including dementia and failure to thrive. An 4/11/24 Annual Pressure Ulcer CAA indicated Resident 5 was at risk for pressure ulcers, was unable to make position changes independently, and had recurrent MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage). A 7/4/24 Unavoidable Pressure Injury Evaluation indicated Resident 5 had MASD which resulted in a pressure injury due to fragile skin and impaired skin integrity despite pressure injury interventions. An 10/2/24 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 5 had a facility acquired Stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer. An 10/12/24 physician order indicated Resident 5 was to receive wound care to her/his coccyx (tailbone) every evening which included to cover the wound bed with calcium alginate (dressing to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided an RA program for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for mobility. This placed residents at risk for increased weakness. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with a diagnosis of paralysis. A 7/23/24 annual MDS indicated Resident 3 had impaired cognition, was bed bound, required a mechanical lift for transfers, and assistance with ADLs. An 8/3/24 PT Discharge Summary revealed Resident 3 was provided therapy services to assist her/him with increased independence with bed mobility, sitting balance while in a wheelchair, and improve ROM to her/his legs. The benefit of therapy was to prevent contractures and muscle wasting. Discharge recommendation included a RA program. The RA program was for ROM for feet mobility and leg rotation. The RA program was also to assist in maintaining the resident's ability to sit at the side of the bed, transfer to the wheelchair, and participate in bed mobility. A care plan revised on 10/30/24 revealed Resident 3 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory treatments were implemented timely and diagnostic results were available in the medical record timely for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for respiratory complications. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 8/2021 with a diagnosis of a stroke. Progress Notes revealed: -10/8/24 Resident 1 was assessed by her/his NP for shortness of breath and orders were placed for a PRN nebulizer (machine which turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be inhaled to treat lung conditions). The note was not signed by the NP as completed until 10/26/24. -10/10/24 Resident 1 had shortness of breath, wheezing, and the physician was faxed to obtain an order for a nebulizer. -10/11/24 Resident 1 had chest pain with deep breaths, an order for a chest x-ray was obtained, and staff were waiting for results. -10/17/24 staff called radiology for x-rays obtained on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor a resident's thyroid hormone level for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for a non-therapeutic medication regimen. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 8/2021 with a diagnosis of obesity. A 9/20/24 Order Summary Report revealed Resident 1 was administered Synthroid (hormone to increase thyroid levels). The start date was 10/9/21. Resident 1's clinical record revealed her/his last TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone; monitors thyroid function) test was obtained on 11/20/22 and the results were within therapeutic range. No additional TSH test results were in the clinical record. On 11/19/24 at 2:00 PM Staff 10 (LPN IP) stated TSH levels were usually checked annually. A request was made to Staff 10 to provide documentation a TSH level was obtained yearly after 2022 or a rationale was in the resident's record indicating it was not required. No additional information was provided. On 11/19/24 at 5:00 PM in interview with Staff 4 (RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide dignity during dining for 1 of 1 sampled dining rooms observed for dining assistance. This placed residents at risk for an undignified dining experience. Findings include: On 1/13/20 at 6:10 PM Staff 10 (CNA) was observed standing and assisting two residents with dining during the evening meal. On 1/14/20 at 12:30 PM and 1/15/20 at 12:23 PM Staff 6 (CNA) was observed standing while assisting two residents with dining during the afternoon meal. On 1/15/20 at 4:12 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she expected staff to interact with residents during meals and not stand over them.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure narcotic drug records were in order and an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion. Findings include: On 1/14/20 at 9:45 AM the D hall medication cart Narcotic log book revealed 24 times out of 107 counting opportunities the facility staff did not sign verification the narcotic count was accurate. On 1/14/20 at 10:30 AM the A hall medication cart Narcotic log book revealed 27 times out of 107 counting opportunities the facility staff did not sign verification the narcotic count was accurate. On 1/14/20 at 11:00 AM the B hall medication cart Narcotic log book revealed 17 times out of 109 counting opportunities the facility staff did not sign verification the narcotic count was accurate. On 1/14/20 at 10:22 AM Staff 2 (DNS) verified the missing signatures in the Narcotic books. Staff 2 acknowledged the Narcotic book always needed to be signed by two nurses to verify the count was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide therapeutic heart healthy diets for 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for worsening health conditions. Findings include: On 1/15/20 at 7:22 AM Staff 5 (Cook) was observed during the breakfast meal portioning hot food according to a typed document posted on the wall near the kitchen steam table titled Portion Sizes and Diets. The document included the following statements: -CCHO (Controlled Carbohydrate) diets-regular protein, regular vegetables, half serving starch, half serving desserts or diabetic dessert. -Heart Healthy-Regular Portions??? Small serving of desserts. On 1/15/20 at 8:10 AM Staff 4 (Dietary Manager) indicated she was not aware of the Portion Sizes and Diet document posted on the kitchen wall. Staff 4 confirmed staff were to follow therapeutic diets as order by the physician for each resident and provide portion sizes and food restriction of therapeutic diets according spreadsheets provided by the Registered Dietitian. Staff 4 also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Pilot Butte Rehabilitation CenterBend, OR 1 of 5Puyallup Post AcutePuyallup, WA 2 of 5Park Rose Care CenterTacoma, WA 2 of 5Regency AlbanyAlbany, OR 2 of 5Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing CenterCoupeville, WA 3 of 5Kauai Care CenterWaimea, HI 3 of 5Laurel Hill Nursing CenterGrants Pass, OR 3 of 5Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab CenterHermiston, OR 3 of 5Sharon Care CenterCentralia, WA 3 of 5View Ridge Care CenterEverett, WA 4 of 5Arlington Health And RehabilitationArlington, WA 4 of 5Regency Care Center At MonroeMonroe, WA 4 of 5Regency FlorenceFlorence, OR 5 of 5Good Samaritan Health Care CtrYakima, WA 5 of 5Mt Baker Care CenterBellingham, WA 5 of 5Regency At NorthpointeSpokane, WA 5 of 5Regency At The ParkCollege Place, WA 5 of 5Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick, WA 5 of 5Regency Care Of Central OregonBend, OR 5 of 5Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterGresham, OR 5 of 5Regency Harmony House Rehab & NursingBrewster, WA 5 of 5Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOlympia, WA 5 of 5Regency OmakOmak, WA 5 of 5Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing CentPrineville, OR 5 of 5Regency Redmond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRedmond, OR 5 of 5Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing CenterWenatchee, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BD FACILITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2010
BEDDOE, MARVINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL99%since 04/01/2010
REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$490K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 24%Other / private 28%

This home reported $490K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$493per resident / day
operating cost
$14,984per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$539per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385064. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next