No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing Center

1326 Red Apple Rd, Wenatchee, WA 98801 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 55 certified beds · (509) 682-2551 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (509) 682-2551 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 20251 actual-harm citation$10,358 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,358 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-06)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1215 S Miller St · (509) 662-1511 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
600 Orondo Ave Ste 3 · (509) 664-3508 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
106 Okanogan Ave · (509) 662-5410 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1100 Cherry St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.5%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%17.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.7%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.6%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.8%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.6%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.6%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.8%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.7%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.431.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.851.521.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 296 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 154 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.1%CMS range 53.8–64.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.9%CMS range 6.8–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.1–8.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.91
RN hoursweekends
46.0%
Total nursing turnover
48.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 48.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.46 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.81 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.98 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-13)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the risks and initiate interventions to prevent further accidents for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 35 and 11) reviewed for accidents. Resident 35 experienced harm when hot soup was served on the overbed table and when the resident went to pull the tray closer to them to be within reach, the soup spilt onto their lap causing a third-degree burn to the left thigh. In addition, the facility failed to provide consistent supervision, thoroughly investigate the cause of falls, and ensure interventions were put into place to prevent further falls for Resident 11. These failures placed the residents at risk for injury and/or medical complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of an article written by the American Burn Association titled Scald Injury Prevention dated 04/25/2017, showed the time and temperatures it would take for a hot liquid to cause a third-degree burn as, 155 degrees Fahrenheit (F), one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents health information remained private for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 5, 3, 23, and 41) reviewed for the resident's right to privacy. Additionally, the facility staff referred to Resident 5 by a pet name which did not respect their right to be addressed by their own name when interacting with staff. This failure placed residents at risk for embarrassment and a poor quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights revised date, 11/2025, showed the facility will honor resident rights as follows: The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including state agencies and the resident's representative. The resident has the right to receive treatment and care with respect and dignity in a manner and in a safe, clean, and homelike environment that promotes maintenance or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification of the notice of transfers to the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a person that advocates for residents in nursing homes) occurred for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 52 and 61) reviewed for discharge. This failure placed the residents at risk for diminished protection, lack of access to an advocate that could inform them of their options and rights, and to ensure the resident advocacy agency was aware of the facility practices and activities related to discharge. Findings included . Resident 52 Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of sepsis (A life threatening medical emergency caused by the body's extreme dysfunctional response to an infection). Review of the 02/18/2026 discharge assessment showed Resident 52's cognition was intact. Review of Resident 52's medical record showed Resident 52 was discharged home on [DATE]. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow up on written notices of bed holds (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) given at the time of hospital transfers, and/or failed to send a copy of the notice of transfers to the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a person that advocates for residents in nursing homes) for four of four residents (Residents 35, 14, 51 and 49) reviewed for discharge process. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed and any monetary charges associated with the bed hold while in the hospital and disallowed the resident and/or their representative an opportunity to fully understand the rationale/resident rights associated with the discharge. This failure also placed the residents at risk for diminished protection, lack of access to an advocate that could inform them of their options and rights, and to ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan [(BCP) a document outlining initial care goals and necessary healthcare information for a resident], within 48 hours of admission, that included the minimum requirements of resident specific goals, physician orders, dietary orders, treatment plans, and social service needs for 6 of 10 residents (Residents 39, 13, 202, 33, 41, and 32) reviewed for new admissions (residents admitted to the facility in the last 30 days). Failure to develop a BCP placed the residents at risk of not receiving continuity of care and resident centered care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, revised 11/08/2021, showed a BCP would be developed within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to care for the resident, that also met regulatory requirements. <Resident 39> Review of the medical record showed Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a designated interdisciplinary [(IDT) a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines to help people receive the care they need] team member, appointed as the responsible party for coordinating care and communication with hospice, and implement the written agreement that ensured effective communication, collaboration, and coordination of care between the facility and the hospice (a specialized type of care focused on providing comfort and support to individuals nearing the end of life) provider for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 39 and 45) reviewed for hospice services. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services at end-of-life. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Palliative/End of Life Care, revised 11/2015, showed the facility and hospice would identify specific services that would be provided by each entity, and that information would be communicated in the care plan. Record review of a document titled, Hospice Services Agreement, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances (resident and/or resident representative concerns that can be voiced or written) conveyed to staff underwent prompt resolution and appropriately updated residents on the grievance progress/conclusion for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 46) reviewed for grievances. This failure placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Grievances Procedure, revised August 2023, showed the facility would ensure each residents' right to .voice grievances (such as those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) . and that facility staff were responsible for making prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident appropriately apprised (updated on information) of progress towards the residents grievance resolution. The policy showed the facility would .have a process in place for identification, investigation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff reported, witnessed verbal and physical abuse, to the State Agency, immediately, but no later than two hours after the abuse took place, for 1 of 3 residents (Residents 41), reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, and the potential continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised October 2022, showed that all facility employees were mandated reporters that must immediately report when there was a reasonable cause to believe an incident of abuse occurred. The facility policy stated all alleged violations involving abuse were to be reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the event had taken place. <Resident 41> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including right below the knee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately implement effective measures in the protection of a resident from further abuse/neglect, nor conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of abuse for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 41 and 11), reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse, unmet care needs, and the potential for continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, revised October 2022, showed that it was the facility's policy to protect residents from abuse and .All alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source must be thoroughly investigated . The policy showed the investigator would collect as much data as needed to be able to reach a reasonable conclusion and that data collection could involve .Interview assigned caregiver, caregivers in the immediate area,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review [(PASARR) a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment] accurately reflected residents' mental health conditions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 39) reviewed for PASARR accuracy. This failure placed the residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings including . Review of a policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, revised 06/2024, showed prior to admitting a resident, the admission coordinator or designee would request a PASARR Level I screening. The Level I screening must be completed prior to admission to identify individuals who have or may have a serious mental illness or related condition. A negative screen would permit admission and end the pre-screening process. Those individuals identified with any qualifying criteria, or a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice regarding, A) a residents Central Vascular Access Device (CVAD, also known as a central line, is a thin, soft tube that is inserted into a main vein in the arm, leg, or neck for long-term administration of antibiotics, medication, nutrition, and/or blood draws) dressing change and medication administration after nursing staff noted the central line migration (movement of the tubing from its original position) for 1 of 4 residents (Residents 32) reviewed for central lines, B) nursing staff failing to process, initiate, and follow physician orders with residents wound care for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 41) reviewed for wound care orders. This failed practice placed residents at risk for improper medication delivery, a delay in treatment, and adverse outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's guidance titled, Central Vascular Access Device Dressing Change, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Centers for Disease Control [(CDC) a public agency that protects the public's health and well-being] guidance for temperature monitoring of vaccines in 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerators (Refrigerator 1) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk of receiving compromised or ineffective vaccines and negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the CDC guidance titled, Vaccine Storage and Handling, dated 04/03/2024, showed to ensure safety of vaccines, the refrigerator must have a reliable temperature monitoring device with the recommended use of a recording device called a digital date logger (DDL-a device that records temperatures at least every 30 minutes). The guidance further showed when a DDL was not used, the facility should monitor and record the vaccine refrigerator temperature at a minimum of twice daily. Review of a policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, revised 08/01/2024, showed the facility would ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal immunizations (a vaccine that protects against pneumococcal infections that can lead to serious lung infections) nor documentation of the resident refusal or acceptance of the vaccine along with education on the risk/benefits of the vaccine for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 29) residents reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations. This failure placed the resident at an increased risk for a contagious disease without the opportunity to make an informed decision in the refusal or acceptance of the pneumococcal vaccine. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Immunizations, revised 2022, showed the facility would offer the pneumococcal vaccine to residents with the facility, and have a consent completed, education and the pneumococcal vaccine administered unless medically contraindicated (something that is not advised as the course of treatment). Additionally, the policy showed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free from accident hazards, due to the placement of a 1500-[NAME] oil filled indoor electric space heater in 1 of 1 resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the residents at risk for avoidable accidents and/or injury. Findings included . An observation on 12/10/2024 at 3:50 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], showed an oil filled indoor electric space heater was on the right side of the sink, turned on medium heat, was hot to touch. When the Department Investigator placed their hand near the electric space heater, they had to quickly remove their hand (after less than two seconds) due to the hot temperature felt on palm of their hand. During an interview on 12/10/2024 at 5:10 PM, Staff B, Maintenance Director, stated they had placed the space heater in room [ROOM NUMBER] when the thermostat in the room stopped working on 12/03/2024. Staff B stated they were not aware if there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address required documentation for Advanced Directives [(ADs) a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity] including incorporating ADs into the care planning process for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 6, 15, and 16) reviewed for ADs. These failures placed the residents at risk of losing their right to have their preferences and/or decisions followed regarding their end-of-life care. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Advanced Directives/POLST (a portable physician order form that describes the residents care direction regarding end of life treatment), revised date 05/2019, showed the Social Services Director (SSD), would offer assistance in developing an AD if the resident wanted to formulate one and the ADs would be reviewed periodically. <Resident 6> Review of the resident's medical record showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement two components of their abuse policy when they did not verify licensure for 1 of 2 staff (Staff AA) for screening and did not provide abuse training for 5 of 8 staff (Staff O, T, U, V, and R) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unrecognized abuse, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation, dated 10/2022, showed the facility would; screen employees by verifying their licensure, and train employees at orientation, annually, and as needed. <Licensure> Review of employee files showed Staff AA, Nursing Assistant Registered (NAR), was hired on [DATE] as a student in a Nursing Assistant (NA) training class at a nearby training center. Staff AA graduated the training class and worked as a NAR for the facility starting on 12/052023. Staff AA obtained NAR licensure on [DATE], which expired on [DATE] (on their annual birthdate) and failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary team [(IDT) a group of healthcare providers from different fields who work together for the best outcome for residents] care conferences were completed for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 18 and 6) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the IDT care conference meetings included the required team members for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 14 and 25) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. These failures disallowed the resident and/or their representative the involvement in planning resident care and placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Care Conferences> <Resident 18> Review of the medical record showed Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services including the consistent use of braces/splints were implemented for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 6, 16, 17, and 23), reviewed for restorative therapy and limited range of motion [(ROM) the extent the joint can move within the expected (normal) range of values]. This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of ROM, deconditioning, and contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen). Findings included . Review of a document titled, Restorative Program, dated 04/2018, showed: The goal of the Restorative Program was to promote and maintain functioning. Identify residents need for a restorative program at the time of admission/readmission/identified concerns. Restorative program to include but not limited to ROM, applying, and removing splint or braces, and walking with/without assisted devices. Daily documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate administration and documentation of enteral feedings (delivery of nutrition directly to your stomach or small intestine through a tube) and fluid intake via gastrostomy tube [(g-tube) a device inserted into the stomach through the abdomen that provides nutrition when you are unable to eat on your own] feedings for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 16) reviewed for enteral feeding. This failed practice put Resident 16 at risk for dehydration, fluid overload, and weight loss/gain. Findings included . <Resident 16> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include difficulty swallowing which resulted in nutritional support provided via a g-tube, malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body) and absent of speech. The comprehensive assessment, dated 12/31/2023, showed Resident 16's cognition was moderately impaired and received greater than 51 percent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Eight medication errors were identified for 3 of 11 residents (Residents 9, 5 and 13) observed during 28 medication administration opportunities, that resulted in an error rate of 28.57%. Errors in medication administration placed the residents at risk for side effects and/or reduced or increased medication effectiveness due to improper administration. Findings included . Review of the Instructions for use of an insulin pen, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (USFDA), dated 10/2022, showed the instructions for use stated to prime (to remove air from the needle and cartridge that may collect during administration) the insulin pen before each injection. This step was important to ensure the insulin pen worked correctly and the proper dose of medication was administered. Review of a document titled, Medication Administration Schedule, showed the following: • AM- Meds to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clinically appropriate self-administration of medications assessment was completed by the interdisciplinary team [(IDT) a group of healthcare providers from different fields who work together for the best outcome for residents] for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 14) reviewed for safe self-administration of medications. Failure to complete a self-administration assessment placed the resident at risk for inaccurate and unsafe medication administration, adverse side effects, and medical complications. Findings included . <Resident 14> Review of the medical record showed Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). The 03/19/2024 comprehensive assessment, showed Resident 14 was dependent on one to two staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, appropriate length bed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 33) reviewed for accommodations. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for discomfort and skin issues. Findings included . <Resident 33> Review of the resident's medical record showed Resident 33 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include degeneration (decline or deterioration) of their lower spine, and left foot drop (difficulty lifting the top part of the foot). The comprehensive assessment, dated 03/02/2024, showed the resident's cognition was intact, required one staff member supervision for transferring, and was independent with bed mobility. An observation on 03/26/2024 at 9:22 AM, showed Resident 33 lying in bed, both feet pushed up against the foot board of the bed. Resident 33's area on the bottom of their left foot, underneath their toes, was red, and appeared soft and wrinkly. Resident 33 lowered the head of the bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice [(ABN) a notification that provides an estimated cost of continuing services which may no longer be covered by Medicare; beneficiaries may choose to continue services but may be financially liable] as required for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 149) reviewed for beneficiary notification. Resident 149 was not issued the required ABN when they remained in the facility after their Medicare Part A skilled nursing and rehabilitation services (nursing services such as intravenous fluids or medications or therapy services) ended. This failure placed the resident at risk for the inability to make informed financial and care decisions related to their continued stay. Findings included . <Resident 149> Review of the medical record showed Resident 149 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including an infection of the left lower leg and venous insufficiency (improper functioning of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a quiet, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 10 resident rooms (Rooms 7, 5, 4, and 3) and 2 of 2 residents (Residents 25 and 33) reviewed for homelike environment. Observations showed resident rooms needed physical repairs, storage of nutritional supplies in cardboard boxes, and noisy beds. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, discomfort, and a non-homelike environment. Findings included . <Physical Repairs> <room [ROOM NUMBER]> An observation on 03/25/2024 at 8:56 AM, showed the wall to the left side of the sink had an area greater than 24 inches by four inches with scraped paint and missing pieces of drywall (a wall panel made of calcium). Additionally, the entrance to the room showed an area greater than 36 inches by four inches of scraped and missing paint and drywall. <room [ROOM NUMBER]> An observation on 03/25/2024 at 10:08 AM, showed an area on the wall, to the right of the sink that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve a grievance involving a missing hearing aide for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 23) reviewed for grievances. The failure to promptly attempt to resolve a grievance disallowed the resident their right to a timely grievance resolution and placed the resident at risk for hearing difficulties and financial concerns. Findings included . Record review of a policy titled, Grievance Procedure, dated 08/2023, showed: • Grievances are resolved immediately, when possible, by the individual receiving the grievance; • The individual receiving the grievance will fill out a grievance form. <Resident 23> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice to the resident and/or resident's representative (RR) of the facility policy for bed hold at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 9) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident and/or resident's representative at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Record review of a policy titled, Bed Hold/Notice of Transfer/Discharge, dated 10/2018, showed: • The facility would offer the option of a bed hold to residents and/or RRs that were out of the facility at the hospital or on social leave, and provide them information on the appeal process if denied readmission to the facility; • Residents and/or RRs would be provided the bed hold notice at the time of transfer. <Resident 9> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-Admissions Screening and Resident Review [(PASARR) a federal required assessment to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. Assesses for serious mental illness and intellectual disability, ensures most appropriate setting for their needs, and receive services they need in those settings) assessment was accurately completed upon or prior to admission to the facility for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 33) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the resident at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health and/or developmentally disability care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), dated 11/2016, showed the facility would request a PASARR prior to admission and it was the Social Service department's responsibility to review the document and ensure it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided assistance with meals for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6) reviewed for dining. This failure placed the resident at risk for weight loss and an undignified dining experience. Findings included . <Resident 6> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include contractures (a shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff, preventing normal movement) to their right hand, arm, shoulder, and leg and Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremors in one hand and stiffness or slowing of movement). The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident's cognition was intact and required one staff assistance with set-up or cleanup with meals. During an interview on 03/25/2024 at 1:25 PM, the Resident's Representative (RR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for bowel and pain management for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 25) reviewed for constipation and pain. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 25> Review of the resident's medical health record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include constipation, a right hip fracture (a partial or complete break in the continuity of any bone in the body), and a right displaced collar bone fracture. The comprehensive assessment, dated 03/10/2024, showed Resident 25's cognition was intact and was dependent on two staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The assessment further showed the resident received an opioid (a class of pain medication) and had constipation. During an interview on 03/26/2024 at 11:50 AM, Resident 25 stated they had issues with constipation and was not sure what they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pre/post dialysis (a process that uses a machine to filter waste and fluids from the blood when the kidneys no longer function) communication forms and vital signs (reflect essential body functions, including your heart beat, breathing rate, temperature, and blood pressure) were completed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 17) reviewed for dialysis services. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified complications. Findings included . Record review of a policy titled Dialysis, dated 11/2015, showed: • Send the dialysis communication form to the dialysis center on treatment days; • Licensed nurse to complete the pre & post dialysis assessments with each dialysis visit, to include vital signs; • Licensed Nurse will review dialysis communication form post dialysis; • Completed dialysis communication forms will be scanned into the resident's medical record; • The licensed nurse will contact the dialysis center if no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure culturally competent, trauma-informed care, related to assessing for trauma and identifying triggers for residents with a history of the loss of a loved one for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 33) reviewed for mood and behavior. This failed practice put residents at risk for re-traumatization, unidentified triggers, and a decline in their psychosocial well-being. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, dated 10/2022, showed residents would be screened on admission, triggers and trauma history would be identified, a care plan would be developed, and services provided if needed. The policy further showed the care plan would be routinely reviewed. <Resident 33> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and insomnia (trouble sleeping). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to serve a nourishing snack at bedtime for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 4, and 17) reviewed for bedtime snacks. This failure placed the residents at risk for hunger, weight loss, and unmet nutritional needs. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including liver and kidney disease. The 03/07/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 1 required moderate to maximum assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs) and set up assistance of one staff member for eating. The assessment also showed the resident had a moderately impaired cognition. <Resident 4> Review of the medical record showed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture) and type II diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the proper disposal of trash for 1 of 1 dumpster reviewed for outdoor refuse storage. Failure to ensure the dumpster was covered placed the facility at risk of attracting bugs, rodents, and an unsanitary environment. An observation on 03/26/2024 at 11:17 AM, showed the dumpster located in a walled off area of the parking lot, with two gates enclosing the front side of the wall and one opened gate on the side. There was one dumpster located inside the enclosure that had both lids open; visible trash included trash bags that were not secured to keep trash contained, and a mattress. An observation on 03/27/2024 at 8:15 AM, showed the dumpster in the same area, with additional bags of trash added from the previous observation, and both dumpster lids open. An observation on 03/28/2024 at 11:32 AM, showed the dumpster with one lid open. During an interview on 03/28/2024 at 11:45 AM, Staff D, Maintenance Director, stated they were responsible for the dumpster and surrounding area. Staff D stated they did not know the lids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-05-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Pilot Butte Rehabilitation CenterBend, OR 1 of 5Puyallup Post AcutePuyallup, WA 2 of 5Park Rose Care CenterTacoma, WA 2 of 5Regency AlbanyAlbany, OR 2 of 5Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing CenterCoupeville, WA 3 of 5Kauai Care CenterWaimea, HI 3 of 5Laurel Hill Nursing CenterGrants Pass, OR 3 of 5Regency Hermiston Nursing & Rehab CenterHermiston, OR 3 of 5Sharon Care CenterCentralia, WA 3 of 5View Ridge Care CenterEverett, WA 4 of 5Arlington Health And RehabilitationArlington, WA 4 of 5Regency Care Center At MonroeMonroe, WA 4 of 5Regency FlorenceFlorence, OR 5 of 5Good Samaritan Health Care CtrYakima, WA 5 of 5Mt Baker Care CenterBellingham, WA 5 of 5Regency At NorthpointeSpokane, WA 5 of 5Regency At The ParkCollege Place, WA 5 of 5Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick, WA 5 of 5Regency Care Of Central OregonBend, OR 5 of 5Regency Care Of Rogue ValleyGrants Pass, OR 5 of 5Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterGresham, OR 5 of 5Regency Harmony House Rehab & NursingBrewster, WA 5 of 5Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOlympia, WA 5 of 5Regency OmakOmak, WA 5 of 5Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing CentPrineville, OR 5 of 5Regency Redmond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRedmond, OR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2016
BEDDOE, MARVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/06/2017

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 31%Other / private 17%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$458per resident / day
operating cost
$13,928per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$446per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505382. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next