Regency Olympia Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 28 beds and averages 22.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.79 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely action was taken when a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a small flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) showed abnormal urine characteristics indicating an infection for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for catheter care. This resulted in Resident 1 experiencing harm when the potential infection was not treated/evaluated timely and the resident required a transfer to the hospital where she was diagnosed with a kidney infection. This failure placed residents at risk of acquiring catheter associated infections, delay in care, pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Catheter Care Policy and Procedure, revised 04/2018, documented residents with long term indwelling catheter use will have care plan interventions developed to prevent complications including urinary tract infections and urethral irritation. Section 6 noted residents with indwelling urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of life. This failure placed residents at risk for compromised health outcomes and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis to include a right hip fracture. The 5-day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/20/2026 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact.Record review of Resident 1's skilled transfer orders dated 02/13/2026, showed physician orders to schedule a follow up appointment with the orthopedic provider for staple removal in two weeks.In an interview on 04/20/2026 at 11:19 AM, Resident 1 said that she had not been out to see the orthopedic surgeon since admission. Resident 1 said she had her staples in for a long time recently having them removed which was painful.Record review of Resident 1's electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that promoted dignity related to uncovered indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder that drains urine into a bag outside of the body) bags for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 21) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for embarrassment, diminished self-worth, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included. Record Review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheters, date revised April 2018, documented, .8. Residents with catheter bags will have them covered or use of bags that provided dignity while in bed with visibility from hallway, out of their room or in community. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Modification of Admission/Medicare - 5 day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 01/13/2026, documented Resident 21 was moderately cognitively impaired and had an indwelling catheter. Record review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed and provided consent before administering psychotropic medications (a medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and/or behaviors) for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 5 & 4) reviewed for unnecessary medications and/or medication consent. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Record Review of the facility's policy titled, Behavior Management/Psychotropic Medication Overview, date revised July 2025, documented, .10. Resident or representative must be fully informed, and consent will be obtained when psychotropic medications are initiated or dosage increased. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/19/2026, showed Resident 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for adverse side effects (ASE) of antianxiety medication (a class of drugs used to treat anxiety [a mental health condition that causes fear, a constant feeling of being overwhelmed, and excessive worry about everyday things]) and/or failed to complete an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) test (a rating scale used to assess the severity of involuntary movements that sometimes develop as a side effect of treatment with antipsychotic medications [a class of drugs primarily used to treat mental health conditions such as hallucinations and delusions]) and/or failed to place a stop date order of 14 days for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (a medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and/or behaviors), and failed to ensure resident specific target behaviors were monitored prior to administering antianxiety medication for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 3, 4, and 25) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I, a screening tool used to identify mental health needs, was requested upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed the residents at risk of unidentified mental health needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Record Review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review WA (PASRR), revised June/2024, documented, .6. The PASRR will be reviewed and updated as indicated with significant changes in resident's physical or mental condition. The state mental health authority will be notified of the changes affecting the resident's physical or mental condition. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 01/28/2026, showed Resident 7 was moderately cognitively impaired and was exhibiting signs of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully address lab results as reported by laboratory services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 31) reviewed for death. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on 03/08/2026. The admission /Medicare - 5 Day minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 02/27/2026, documented Resident 31 was severely cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 31's electronic health record showed a physician's order, dated 03/05/2026, for CBC (complete blood count) with Platelets, BMP (Basic metabolic panel, a blood test measuring kidney health, electrolyte balance; essential minerals including sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, and phosphate, fluid status, and blood sugar levels).Record review of Resident 31's laboratory results, dated 03/07/2026, indicated, Mild Hemolysis [blood sample destruction] Present; Some…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor residents' heart rate (HR) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 03/13/2026, indicated Resident 3 was alert and oriented and had a diagnosis of chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythms that do not revert to normal rhythm on their own).Record review of Resident 3's electronic health record (EHR) showed a Physician's order, dated 03/09/2026, for Digoxin (medication used to manage irregular heart rhythms) Oral Tablet 125 MCG (micrograms) to give 1 tablet orally in the morning for atrial fibrillation.Record review of Resident 3's EHR showed Resident 3's HR was 58 bpm (beats per minute) on 03/13/2026, 56 bpm on 03/20/2026, 59 bpm on 03/23/2026, 57 bpm on 03/27/2026 and 51 bpm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcers were appropriately identified, and physician orders were obtained for 1 of 4 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for quality of care. This failure resulted in Resident 1 developing pressure wounds and not receiving appropriate medical interventions.Findings included. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer Prevention Guidelines, dated March 2014, documented, It is the policy of this facility to implement care and services to prevent residents from developing pressure ulcers. 1. Pressure ulcer prevention interventions include 4 major approaches: a. Minimizing pressure.b. Managing moisture. c. Prevention of friction and shear [skin tearing or damage].d. Maintaining adequate nutrition and hydration.Review of the facility's policy Skin at Risk program, dated April 2018, documented, Procedure 4. An appropriate treatment order will be obtained from the resident's physician and implemented when a wound is identified.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported timely for 1 of 2 [Resident 1] sampled residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for potential verbal and physical abuse, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Exploitation policy dated 10/2022, documented that Individual mandatory reporters must immediately report to the Abuse Hotline when there is reasonable cause to believe an incident is abuse, neglect or exploitation. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation following a hospitalization. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/08/2025, indicated that Resident 1 was mildly cognitively impaired.Review of Resident 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 07/25/2025, at 2:33 AM, showed Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documented in the progress notes Resident 2 was raising her voice,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use was implemented during linen sorting and washing machine cleaning in 1 of 1 facility laundry areas, failed to ensure PPE was used during personal care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 14), failed to ensure safe hand hygiene practices were implemented during dressing changes for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 12 and 124), failed to develop a complete Water Management Program to reduce the risk of Legionella (a family of micro-organisms which are naturally found in water bodies) growth and spread in the facility, and failed to create an Infection Prevention and Control Program based on a facility and community-based infection control (IC) risk assessment. These failures placed residents at risk of potential contaminants being passed from staff to residents, worsening wound infections, and developing Legionnaires disease (a severe form of pneumonia, a lung infection,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $193K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA