No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mountain Meadows Health And Rehabilitation

1680 Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, AR 72501 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (870) 251-1112 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (870) 251-1112 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 17 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2450 Batesville Blvd · (870) 569-4934 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
1740 Batesville Blvd · (870) 251-4082 · Call to confirm hours
Park
134 Jamestown Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1701 Batesville Blvd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.1%9.5%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%4.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%1.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.9%10.1%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.7%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%13.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.2%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.4%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.6%24.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit1.7%12.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.302.011.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.092.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.1%CMS range 31.1–51.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.2–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.7–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.74
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
45.7%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 86.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-13)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: [NAME] Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were covered or sealed, and staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment for 3 of 3 meals observed. The findings include: During an observation and interview on 08/10/2025 at 10:34 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 turned on the hand washing sink faucet and washed her hands. After washing her hands, DA # 1 turned off the faucet with her bare hands, which contaminated her hands. Without rewashing her hands, DA #1 placed gloves on her hands, contaminating the gloves. DA #1 used her gloved hands to place slices of strawberries on top of the cake to be served to the residents for lunch. This surveyor asked DA #1 what she should have done after touching dirty objects and before handling food items. DA #1 stated she should have washed her hands. During an observation and interview on 08/10/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff handled, stored, processed, and transported laundry in a manner that prevented the spread of infection based on two of two observations made. The findings include: During an observation on 08/10/2025 at 11:44 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 walked out of room [ROOM NUMBER] with linens that were touching her clothes. She took the linen to a linen room that was next door to room [ROOM NUMBER]. When asked, CNA #5 indicated the linens were removed from one of the beds in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation on 08/10/2025 at 11:45 AM, CNA #6 walked out of room [ROOM NUMBER] with linens that were touching her clothes. She took the linen to a linen room next door to room [ROOM NUMBER]. She indicated these linens were removed from one of the beds in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 08/10/2025 at 11:50 AM, CNA #5 stated that the dirty linen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive a diet that meets their nutritional needs, is visually pleasing, prepared in a manner to maintain nutritional content and taste to encourage consumption and maintenance of good nutrition and hydration status. The findings are: 1. Resident #25 had a diagnosis of unspecified dementia. a. Review of the Minimum Date Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/28/2024 revealed Resident #25 received a score of 14 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Resident #25 required set up only for eating as they were capable of eating independently. a. On 05/05/2024 at 12:33 PM, Resident # 25 is observed with their lunch meal. The resident took a fork and inserted it multiple times into a large square of meatloaf. The resident is heard to say that the meatloaf looks like something that has been pulled from the toilet. The resident is observed to take a bit of the meatloaf and immediately lay the fork down on the plate. Resident #25 described…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food was used prior to the use by date. The findings are: On 05/05/2024 at 10:30 AM, the following items were observed in what is referred to as the cook's refrigerator, all of which had a use by date of or before 05/04/2024: 1. 1/4 steam table pan of sliced ham 2. 1/4 steam table pan of macaroni and tomatoes. 3. 1/2 gallon container 1/2 full of stewed tomatoes. 4. 1/4 steam table pan of mechanical soft ham. 5. 1/4 quarter steam table pan of mechanical soft meatballs. 6. A plastic container of pizza sauce, 1/3 full. Also located in the cook's refrigerator was a plastic bag containing 4 hard-boiled eggs with a use by date of 04/28/2024 and a plastic 1 pound bag of sliced turkey with no use by date. On 05/05/2024 at 10:40 AM, a plastic container 1/2 full of chopped tomatoes was located in the walk in refrigerator. The tomatoes had a use by date of 05/04/2024. On 05/05/2024 at 10:47 AM, a 1 pound bag of spaghetti was observed on a shelf in the dry storage area. The bag was not sealed, leaving the food item exposed to air…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' fingernails were kept clean for 01 (Residents #08) of 01 sample mix residents; that residents were showered on scheduled shower days for 01 (Resident #81) of 01 sample mix resident; and that male residents were shaved to promote good personal hygiene for 02 (Resident R #81, #08) of 02 sample mix resident. The findings are: 1. Review of a Care Plan for Resident #81 dated 12/28/2023 revealed, .The resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) dementia, debility, weakness, UTI (urinary tract infection) . Personal Hygiene/ Oral Care: The resident is able to: set up assist .Bathing/ Showering: The resident is able to: set-up assist . a. Review of a Facility In-service dated 01/29/2024 revealed, Medicare residents' showers MUST be done on their scheduled day. If a Medicare resident refuses, notify your nurse as you would with the LTC (Lont Term Care) resident. If a Medicare resident is in with therapy, work around therapy's schedule. Any issues or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a meaningful program of activities for twelve residents reviewed for activities. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the activity program was designed to meet the individual activity needs, interests, and abilities for Residents who reside on the secure unit, and the facility failed to ensure that activities were provided on the weekend for all 97 residents in the facility. The findings are: On 05/05/2024 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor identified that there were no activities being provided on the secure unit. A jigsaw puzzle was observed on the table. No residents were observed to attempt the puzzle. On 05/06/2024 at 2:30 PM, during the resident council meeting 6 members of the council reported that no activities are being held on the weekends. They reported that occasionally a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) will put-in a movie or games will be left in the dining room, but no structured activities are held. On 05/07/2024 at 2:07 PM, the surveyor observed no activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that smokeless tobacco was kept at the nurses station to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #45 and Resident #67) out of 2 sampled residents and failed to ensure that a fall mat was well maintained for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment reference Date (ARD) of 04/17/2024 revealed Resident #45 scored a 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. A review of the Care Plan for Resident #45 revealed, Focus: The Resident uses smokeless tobacco, Goal: The Resident will not use smokeless tobacco without supervision through the review date, Interventions: Instruct the resident about the facility policy on smoking: locations, times, safety concerns. b. On 05/05/2024 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #45 sitting up in recliner, on the bedside table over Resident #45's lap sat two plastic containers of wintergreen snuff. One of the plastic containers was missing a lid,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1) ensure that residents receiving inhaled corticosteroids (an anti-inflammatory medication) were instructed to rinse their mouths to prevent irritation and infection for 1 (Resident #67) sampled resident, (2) ensure residents receive medications as ordered for 2 (Residents #57 and #79) sampled residents, (3) ensure that wound care was performed in a manner to prevent contamination and infection for 1 (Resident #19) sampled resident, and (4) ensure that residents were monitored and treated for urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #22) sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #67 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure. a. Review of a 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/10/2024 revealed Resident #67 scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all pharmaceuticals were available for, and provided to, residents during medication administration for 2 (Residents #79 and #57) sampled residents. The finding are: 1. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #79 revealed an order dated 03/15/2024 that indicated, .Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 5-325 mg (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth two time a day related to Primary Osteoarthritis, Left Shoulder Hold Date from 05/06/2024 1237 to 05/07/2024 at 8:00 AM Another order dated 04/27/2024 indicated, Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 mg (Lorazepam) Give 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day related to Dementia Hold Date from 05/06/2024 at 12:39 PM to 05/07/2024 at 8:00 AM . a. On 05/07/2024 at 08:31 AM, during observation of medication administration for the 100 Hall with Registered Nurse (RN) #01, Resident #79 did not receive Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen and Lorazepam. b. On 05/07/2024 at 09:47 AM, the Surveyor interviewed RN #01 and asked, Should Resident #79 have received Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen and Lorazepam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to maintain a medication rate of less than 5% to prevent complications for 02 (Resident # 79, #57) of 03 residents observed during medication pass resulting in medication errors. Six errors were identified in 27 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 22.22%. The findings are: 1. Review of a Physician's Order for Resident #67 dated 08/28/2023 revealed, .[named brand] Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 100-25 mcg/ACT (microgram/activation) (Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol) 1 puff inhale orally one time a day related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation. Rinse/ spit after administration. (This is a combination medication for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. It contains fluticasone furoate, an inhaled corticosteroid.) a. On 05/07/2024 at 08:14 AM, during observation of medication administration for the 100 Hall with Registered Nurse (RN) #01, RN #01 did not have Resident #67 rinse their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident had incontinent care performed before wound treatment care to prevent potential cross contamination of infection for 1 (Resident #19) sampled resident, to ensure a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube syringe was properly changed or cleaned after use for 1 (Resident #57) sampled resident, and to ensure a catheter bag was properly maintained for 1 (Resident #67) sampled resident. 1. Review of Medical Diagnoses revealed Resident #19 had diagnoses of multiple sclerosis and pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4. a. A quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 03/11/24 documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates intact cognition) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS]. b. On 05/05/2024 at 10:00 AM, Resident #19 said, I am worried about my pressure ulcer [PU]. I got my PU at another facility, and I had to get part of my sacrum removed. I am supposed to get a wound vac [Vacuum Assisted Closure of Wound - negative pressure wound therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that before a resident was allowed to self-administer updraft treatments, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) conducted an assessment to determine if this practice was safe, obtain a physician order for self-administration, and develop a care plan to address educating the resident on self-administration, to prevent potential errors in administration for 1 (Resident #64) sampled resident. The findings are: Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/01/2024 revealed Resident #64 scored 00 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status. Review of Resident #64's Care Plan did not reference the resident self-administrating medication. On 05/07/2024 at 8:01 AM, Resident #64's was observed lying in bed. A nebulizer treatment was running with the mask not secured to the resident's face, and no nurse present in the room. The surveyor went to the hallway and asked Registered Nurse (RN) #1 to come to Resident #64's bedside. Upon entry to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to indicate the presence of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 (Resident #57) out of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Review of an Order Summary revealed Resident #57 had diagnoses of gastrostomy status and dysphagia following cerebral infraction. 2. Review of a quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/24/2024 revealed Resident #57 scored a 5 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Section K indicated, Feeding Tube (e.g., nasogastric, or abdominal PEG) .No had been on 04/24/2024 at 5:58 AM. 3. On 05/08/2024 at 11:25 AM, the Surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator, and asked them to check section K in the most recent MDS, dated [DATE], and identify if Resident #57 was coded for a PEG tube. The MDS Coordinator stated, Resident #57 has a peg tube, and it's marked no. Should have been marked yes. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was individualized to addressed appropriate care and services for use of oxygen for 01 (Resident #54) of 01 sampled residents. The findings are: Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dyspnea. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/15/2024 reveled a score of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 05/05/2024 at 10:50 AM, the Surveyor observed a lab technician currently in Resident #54's room conducting a chest x-ray. On 05/05/24 at 11:07 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Resident #54 and asked, Do you know why you just had a chest x-ray? Resident #54 stated, They did the x-ray because I can't breathe. Resident #54 is observed to be receiving 2.5-3.0 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. On 05/07/24 at 01:36 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #54 on 2 liters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect all 91 residents who received meals from the kitchen (Total Census: 91) as documented on the Midnight Census report provided by the Administrator on 04/03/23 at 3:07 PM. The findings are: 1. On 04/04/23 at 9:38 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 opened the refrigerator door and removed pitchers of orange juice and tea and a bottle of cranberry juice and placed them on the counter. Without washing her hands, she picked up glasses by the rims and placed them on the counter. She then poured the beverages into the glasses to be served to the residents with their lunch meal. The Surveyor asked, What should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling clean equipment? She stated, Washed my hands. 2. On 04/04/23 at 9:42 AM, DE #1 opened the refrigerator door and removed a half gallon of milk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and medical supplies were removed and placed into an area for destruction to prevent potential administration to residents. The failed practice had the potential to affect all 91 residents who resided in the facility and received medication and or medical supplies from 2 of 2 medication rooms and 1 medication cart according to a list provided by the Administrator on 04/03/23 at 3:07 p.m. The findings are: 1. On 04/06/23 at 9:45 a.m., the following items were in the Medication Supply Room: a. 2 - Incentive Spirometer with an expiration date of 1/28/2021. b. 1 - Urinary Catheter Kit dated 1/28/23. c. 1 - Hypodermoclysis Prep Kit with an expiration date of 9/25/22. d. 1 - Intravenous Start Kit with an expiration date of 1/13/23. e. 2 - Statlocks with expiration dates of 12/28/2021 and 5/28/2022. f. 1 - medium (red top) vial with an expiration date of 1/17/2022. 2. On 04/06/23 at 9:50 a.m., the following items were in the 200 Hall Medication Room: a. 1 - 8oz bottle of hand sanitizer with an expiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed to address the necessary care and monitoring related to the administration of antidepressants and psychotropic medications to enable staff to determine the effectiveness of the medication and promptly identify any potential adverse effects for 1 (Resident #89) of 18 (Residents #2, #11, #22, #24, #29, #32, #39, #42, #53, #66, #69, #71, #75, #80, #81, #82, #86 and #89) sampled residents who had Physician Orders for an antidepressant and 3 (Residents #75, #82 and #89) sampled residents who had Physician Orders for an antipsychotic. The findings are: Resident #89 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset, Unspecified, Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/22/23 documented the resident scored 5 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Ridgecrest Health And RehabilitationJonesboro, AR 2 of 5Bailey Creek Health And RehabTexarkana, AR 2 of 5Magnolia Square Nursing And RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5St. Elizabeth's PlaceJonesboro, AR 2 of 5Twin Lakes Therapy And LivingFlippin, AR 2 of 5Westwood Health And Rehab, INCSpringdale, AR 3 of 5Alcoa Pines Health And RehabilitationBenton, AR 3 of 5Birch Pointe Health And RehabilitationSpringfield, MO 3 of 5James River Nursing And RehabilitationSpringfield, MO 3 of 5The Lakes At Maumelle Health And RehabilitationMaumelle, AR 3 of 5Timberlane Health & RehabilitationEl Dorado, AR 3 of 5Windcrest Health And Rehab INCSpringdale, AR 4 of 5Beebe Retirement Center, Inc.Beebe, AR 4 of 5Chapel Woods Health And RehabilitationWarren, AR 4 of 5Evergreen Living Center At StagecoachBryant, AR 4 of 5Gassville Therapy And LivingGassville, AR 4 of 5Heritage Living CenterConway, AR 4 of 5Hiram Shaddox Health And RehabMountain Home, AR 4 of 5Katherine's Place at WedingtonFayetteville, AR 4 of 5Maples Health And Rehabilitation, TheSpringfield, MO 4 of 5Oak Ridge Health And RehabilitationEl Dorado, AR 4 of 5Silver Oaks Health And RehabilitationCamden, AR 4 of 5Southridge Village Nursing And RehabHeber Springs, AR 5 of 5Amberwood Health And RehabilitationBenton, AR 5 of 5Care Manor Nursing And RehabMountain Home, AR 5 of 5Chambers Health And RehabilitationCarlisle, AR 5 of 5Corning Therapy And Living CenterCorning, AR 5 of 5Eaglecrest Nursing And RehabAsh Flat, AR 5 of 5Edgewood Health And RehabSpringdale, AR 5 of 5North Hills Life Care and RehabFayetteville, AR 5 of 5Pioneer Therapy And LivingMelbourne, AR 5 of 5Rector Nursing And RehabRector, AR 5 of 5Southfork River Therapy And LivingSalem, AR 5 of 5Spring Creek Health & RehabCabot, AR 5 of 5The Crossing At Riverside Health And RehabilitatioSearcy, AR 5 of 5The Maples At Har-Ber MeadowsSpringdale, ARNot ratedQuail Run Health And RehabTrumann, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/13/2012
SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
IVIE, BOBBIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
MOSER, TONYAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/26/2016
TALBOT, LAURENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
ADAMS, ANTHONYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
ADAMS, BRYANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
ELLIS, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
KOEHLER, TOBEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
3B HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
INDEPENDENCE RE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
LTC SYSTEMS/RX, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
PHARMACY CONSULTS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
RELIANCE HEALTH CARE, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
MCGINNIS, LARRYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
SCRIBNER, JOHNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/14/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 6%Other / private 19%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$247per resident / day
operating cost
$7,502per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$276per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045369. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next