Chapel Woods Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 70.6 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 69 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2025-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was not left outside alone, unsupervised, and after hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for neglect. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.12 (Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 05/04/2025 around 5:45 PM when Resident #1 was left outside, alone and unsupervised, in the courtyard of the secured unit. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Nurse Consultant were notified of the IJ on 05/09/2025 at 8:54 AM. A plan of removal was requested. The removal plan was accepted by the State Survey Agency on 05/09/2025 at 6:36 PM. The immediacy of the IJ was removed on 05/09/2025 at 6:36…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent (%) during the medication administration observation of 1 (Resident #7) of 2 (Residents #1 and #7) sampled residents, and one (Resident #8) non-sampled resident who received medications from 1 Registered Nurse (RN) and 2 Certified Med Techs (CMT). Observed 25 opportunities of medication administration and 2 of the 25 medications were not administered in accordance with the physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 8.00%. The findings are: 1. On 03/11/2025 at 9:06 AM, CMT #2 entered Resident #7's room to administer the medication she had prepared. CMT #2 gave the resident a cup of pills with a cup of water. Once the resident took the pills, CMT #2 administered one drop of [Name brand - Polyethylene Glycol 440 / Propylene Glycol] ophthalmic (eye) drops in each of the resident's eyes. CMT #2 did not take [brand name] laxative to the resident with the other medications. Resident #7's Order Summary Report was reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated for 3 (Residents #1, #4 and #5) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse and 1 (Resident #6) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for neglect. The findings are: 1)The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/2024, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated the resident was not cognitively intact. Diagnoses on the MDS included end-stage renal disease (kidney disease), bipolar disorder (depression/mania), dementia, and heart failure. The resident's Incident Report (I&A) and corresponding action plan were reviewed for completeness. A review of Resident #1's I&A revealed the following: a. On 10/31/2024 the resident made allegations of abuse. b. The I&A Report dated 10/31/2024 stated Admin interviewed cognitive residents on C Hall with no negative findings. Residents unable to be interviewed were assessed for any signs of abuse with no negative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff thoroughly washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date; foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed, and dated; and hot food item was maintained at the required temperature on the tray above the steam table for one meal observed. The findings are. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/21/24 at 10:02 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 removed bananas from the original box and placed them on the counter, contaminating her hands. DA #1 then peeled off the skin layers from the bananas and placed them on the cutting board and held it with her hands while she sliced them with a knife. DA #1 then transferred the slices of bananas into a bowl on the counter to be used in preparing dessert to be served to the residents for lunch. DA #1 stated she should have washed her hands. 2. On 10/21/24 at 10:05 AM, an opened box of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the process for dispensing controlled substances was consistently implemented to decrease the potential for diversion of medications from one of four medication carts from which a random narcotic count was performed. The findings are: On 10/24/2024 at 1:19 PM, this surveyor and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 performed a random narcotic count of the contents of the controlled substance box on the medication cart for halls E and F. During the count, the following were observed: 1. Page 74 indicated Resident #75 had Diazepam 5 milligrams (mg), last signed out on 10/24/2024 at 0900 (9:00 AM) by LPN #3 and 39 tablets (tabs) remaining for the balance. Upon review of the medication card, there were 38 tabs remaining. LPN #3 stated the medication was sent out of the facility at 11:30 AM with Resident #75's family member. (Diazepam is used to treat anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures.) 2. Page 77 indicated Resident #25 had Hydro-APAP (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 (5 milligrams per 325…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacist medication regimen review recommendations were addressed for 3 (Residents #2, #3 and #69) of 5 (Residents #2, #3, #53, #69 and #77) sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary and psychotropic medications, and medication regimen reviews (MRRs). The findings are: Resident #3's medical diagnosis screen was reviewed and indicated the resident was diagnosed with a condition which caused loss of thinking and decision-making skills which interfered with daily life (dementia) and a change in the mental status (altered mental status). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/27/2024, was reviewed and indicated Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact and was taking the following high-risk drugs: an antipsychotic, an antidepressant, an antibiotic, a diuretic (removes excess fluid) and antiplatelet. Resident #3's Order Summary Report was reviewed and indicated the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised to reflect the resident's most recent care needs for 1 (Resident #3) sampled resident whose care plan was reviewed. The findings are: Resident #3's medical diagnosis screen was reviewed and indicated the resident was diagnosed with a condition which caused loss of thinking and decision-making skills which interfered with daily life (dementia) and a change in the mental status (altered mental status). A quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/27/2024, was reviewed and indicated Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was taking the following high-risk drugs: an antipsychotic, an antidepressant, an antibiotic, a diuretic (removes excess fluid) and antiplatelet. Resident #3's Order Summary Report was reviewed and indicated the following orders: a. Bumex (removes excess fluid) 2 milligrams (mg) and give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day and was ordered on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure toenail care was consistently provided during resident care for 1 (Resident #22) sampled resident reviewed for nail care. The findings are: On 10/21/2024 at 11:57 AM, Resident #22 was leaned back in a recliner and the left shoe was off. The toenails were observed to be discolored, thick and had jagged edges. The resident stated the staff used to trim the toenails on bath days, which the resident thought were Tuesdays and Fridays. Resident #22's medical diagnosis screen was reviewed and indicated the resident had a condition which affected the airflow in the lungs and breathing (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and a condition in which the heart could not pump blood as efficiently (heart failure). An annual Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/04/2024, was reviewed and indicated Resident #22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, which indicated moderately cognitively impaired and required partial/moderate assistance with the bathing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 10/21/24 at 11:41 AM, during the noon meal preparation Dietary Aide (DA) #1 placed 10 servings of cheesy biscuits into a blender added milk, pureed, and used a #8 scoop to portion it into 10 individual bowls, covered the bowls with lids and placed them in the refrigerator. a. On 10/21/24 at 12:46 PM, 7 of 8 residents did not receive pureed cheesy biscuits. b. On 10/21/24 at 12:56 PM, during an interview DA #1 stated she forgot to serve pureed cheesy biscuit to the remaining 7 residents.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff donned the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while performing high contact resident activities for 1 (Resident #76) sampled resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The findings include: A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/18/2024 revealed Resident #76 had memory problems and a history of coughing/choking during meals or when swallowing medications. A plan of care (revision date: 9/17/2024) revealed Resident #76 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube. On 10/23/24 at 7:50 AM, the Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 administer medication to Resident #76 via PEG tube wearing only gloves, with no additional PPE. On 10/23/24 at 8:00 AM, during an interview LPN #1 stated, I messed up, I did not wear a gown. On 10/23/24 at 2:18 PM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) stated staff should wear a gown and gloves when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer and refrigerator were covered or sealed to decrease the potential for cross contamination; expired food items were promptly removed/discard by the expiration or use by dates as when it was delivered, door frames, ceiling tiles, ceiling vent floor tiles were free of stains, debris, rust and chipped; 1 of 2 ice machines was maintained in clean and sanitary condition, staff washed their hands, and dietary staff washed their hands and between clean tasks to decrease the potential for food borne illness dirty and clean, before handing food items. The failed practices had the potential to 80 affect residents who received meals from the kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 12/11/23 at 10:12 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 pulled her mask up. Without washing her hands, she picked up glasses and placed them on the counter, with her fingers touching the rims. She then poured beverages in the glasses to be served to the residents with their lunch meal. 2. On 12/11/23 at 10:19 AM, DE #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-05-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR