The Lakes At Maumelle Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 43.5 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.09 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.30 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed. The findings include: A review Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/26/2025, revealed the facility admitted Resident #42 on 09/22/2022. Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed, Resident #42 used a manual wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #42's Medical Diagnoses report revealed diagnoses that included a long-lasting open sore that developed due to poor circulation in the veins of left lower extremity, swelling, paralysis and weakness following a stroke which affected the left side, muscle wasting and atrophy, unsteadiness on feet, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, venous insufficiency, depression, anxiety, and high blood pressure. A review of Resident #42's Active Orders revealed active orders to assess the left lower extremity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Physician's Order for the administration of oxygen was received for one (Resident #50) of two residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The findings include: A review of Resident #50's admission Record from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure. A review of Resident #50's Physician's Orders from the resident's EHR revealed there was no order for the administration of oxygen. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/14/2025, revealed Resident #50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated that Resident #50 received oxygen therapy while a resident at the facility. A review of Resident #50's Care Plan Report, initiated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dishes were properly sanitized. The findings are: 1. On 6/03/2024 at 11:06 AM the surveyor asked Dietary Consultant if she could check the temperature of the dishwasher. The dishwasher was currently in a rinse cycle. Dietary Consultant placed the thermometer in bowl of hot water inside dishwasher. The temperature reached 130. Dietary Consultant then ran the rinse cycle a little longer and then rechecked the water. The thermometer then reached the temperature of 140. The Dietary Manager stated, sometimes the dishwasher may need to run a few cycles before the temperature climbs. The surveyor then showed the Dietary Consultant the binders where temperatures should be documented. The book had not yet been documented for the month of June. The Dietary Consultant stated that the kitchen staff most likely have the temperatures written down on paper that had not yet been added to the binder. a. On 6/04/2024 at 7:47 AM, Surveyor spoke with Dietary Manager (DM) regarding temperatures from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was individualized to addressed appropriate care and services for use of fall mats for 2 (Resident #26, and #43) of 2 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #26 had a diagnosis of fall from slipping, tripping, and stumbling with subsequent striking against other objects and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur. a. Annual Minimum Data Set with the Assessment Reference Date of 04/17/24 that documented that Resident #26 scored 04 (0-7 indication severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status and b. A Care Plan for Resident #26, revision date 03/25/22, documented that Resident #26 was at risk for falls related to (r/t) poor balance, weakness, Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), Hypertension (HTN), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and Seizures. The Care Plan for Resident #26 did not note that a fall mat was put into place as an intervention. c. On 06/02/24 at 10:34 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #26 lying in bed and the fall mat was placed under the bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents that require fall mats at the bedside have them placed in a manor to prevent injury in event of a fall for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 sample mix residents; to ensure fall mats at the bedside were properly maintained for 1 (Resident #43) of 1 sample mix residents; to ensure housekeeping carts and janitors closet was kept secure. The findings are: On 06/02/24 at 2:52 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #43 lying in bed, lunch tray with 25% eaten on over the bed table sitting on fall mat that has tears and edges are peeling up. Progress note dated 04/12/2024 noted Nursing Incident and Accident Report showed the following: Description: Was found on the floor of bedroom lying on left side. Aide found resident on the floor. Immediate Intervention: Check head to make sure resident didn't hit it. Complained of pain in the left arm and left hip, no bruising on the hip, but was discoloration on the left forearm. Progress note dated 4/16/2024 at 03:01 noted Nursing-Hot Rack Charting: Neuro checks completed. No…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in accordance with professional principles and the facility's policy. This failed practice had the potential to affect every Resident residing in the building. The findings include: 1. On 06/03/24 at 7:38 AM, the Surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 walk to the dining room, with a medication cup in hand, leaving the medication cart unlocked. a. On 06/03/24 8:31 AM, the Surveyor observed an unattended unlocked medication cart in the hallway up against the wall not in front of a doorway. The Surveyor could hear talking in the room across the hall encouraging a Resident to take medication. The Surveyor walked up the hall father to see in the room and observed LPN #9 at the head of bed with her back to the door. b. On 06/03/24 at 8:35 AM, LPN #9 confirmed she was the nurse who left the medication cart unlocked and the medication cart was not viewable from position in the room. c. On 06/05/24 at 9:34 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) voiced the cart should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the observations, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 sampled (Resident #20) did not self-administer medication prior to an assessment conducted by the interdisciplinary team to determined it clinically appropriate and safe for the Resident to do so. The findings include: Resident #20 had a diagnosis of dysphagia, acute kidney failure, and chronic pulmonary edema. Resident #20 had an order for sore throat oral liquid (Acetaminophen) give 1 spray by mouth every 2 hours as needed for pain - moderate related to COVID-19 throat pain. Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/09/24 that documented that Resident #20 was unable to complete the Brief Interview of Mental Status and had long term memory problems. A Care Plan for Resident #20 did not document that Resident self-administers medications. On 06/03/24 at 8:45 AM, the Surveyor noted sore throat spray was on Resident #20 ' s bedside table. On 06/03/24 at 8:56 AM, the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) are there any residents in the facility that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to protect the Patient Health Information (PHI) of 1 (Resident #2) sampled resident. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. On 06/03/2024 at 7:38 AM, the Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 walk to the dining leaving the computer screen on the laptop mounted to a medication cart unlocked displaying Resident #2's personal and medical information. The following was observed: a. Facility name b. Resident's name c. Status d. Location e. Gender f. date of birth g. Age h. Physician i. Allergies j. Code status k. Ordered medications 2. On 06/03/2024 at 7:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) observed the Surveyor standing at the medication cart taking notes and pictures and instructed LPN #8 to leave the facility. The Surveyor was unable to conduct an interview with LPN #8 due to LPN #8 no longer being in the building. 3. On 06/05/2024 at 9:34 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the computer screen should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 01 (Resident #40) of 1 sample mix residents. The findings are: Resident #40's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/29/2024 documented the Resident as taking an anticoagulant, however there is no physician order on the order recap report dating back to 02/28/2024 noting the resident taking an anticoagulant. On 06/04/24 at 10:23 AM, the Surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator and asked, Does resident #40's MDS with an ARD of 02/29/2024 indicate the Resident is taking an anticoagulant? MDS Coordinator stated, It's saying yes. When asked, Can you tell me when resident #40 was ordered an anticoagulant? She stated, On [Resident #40] current orders it doesn't say [Resident #40] takes one let me look on [Resident #40's] other. I'm not seeing where [Resident #40] had an anticoagulant. When asked, Is Resident #40's MDS coded correctly? She stated, No ma'am it's not and we will be doing a modification on that.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide palatable food to Residents. The findings are: Resident #4 has a medical diagnosis of: Encephalopathy, muscle wasting & atrophy, pulmonary edema, anxiety disorder, restlessness, Type II Diabetes with Hyperglycemia, Parkinsonism, and edema. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 4/12/2024 shows Resident to have a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), cognitive assessment summary. On 6/03/24 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor asked Resident #4 if pleased with the food received at this facility. Resident told surveyor that the food doesn't taste very good most of the time. On 6/03/2024 at 1:02 PM, the surveyor checked the Resident's meal card and there was an order for sweet and low. The Resident told the surveyor there was none on the tray. The surveyor observed there to be no sweet and low on resident's meal tray to go in resident's beverage. On 6/04/2024 at 8:57 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident's breakfast meal being set up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR